Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adobe Scan 10 Feb 2023
Adobe Scan 10 Feb 2023
bject o f
this provision to
I
ofhis deathtill
protect the property
the person(s)
701
entitled to it which was in
time
the
at
circumstances
ASES.hThelive step in 27 possession of «
SCd, along
live and spcnt
with namely recovery of
I CfrOmt h e
Ised, andges,
accussd
From the custody
the t
of the cartridges,
revolver of the
of mohE deceased recovery
he murder of der
of the deccascd with the fact that the handse of
n mobile accused
accused (and that he continued to use itit iphone which awas sing was using the
R l CO t
the
Hnzbt, that
the prosccution has hro
brought home the
till his
arrest), registered in
leaves
the accused charges as have been found
no room
against
hod aga
tNhIshed the accused.276 Where
Whe
was held he had mitted offence under this misused the ATM card of to
the
section.2
Of Criminal Breach of
Trust
malbreach 4051 Whoever, being in
Is
any manner entrusted
or with any dominion over property. with
a n v e r t s
ILLUSTRATIONS
the which
law directs him
A, being dishonestly disobeys has committed eriminal
deceased person, A
voe the will of a them to his
own use.
n of tne
trust. tects according to the Will,
v and appropriate
2013
PrabH Munish Mubarv State,
Bhatnagar v State, 2007 Cr.LJ4349 (Raj). 2012 Cr LJ 413; fiom the accused
SCC 675: 20
recovered
contirmed
CI) of Delhi, (2011) 10
deceased
the Convietion
S6 (s 912. Articles
belong to
offer any
explanation. ehan deceased
of
SC could not
Stale of 2930
(Ker)-Gold Rajasthan
us discloc d i c m e n t , Accused State,2009 Cr LJ Ramesh v
Ajayanv
see
Colurt Also
eredme Alias proper. held
ofthousn was
oneof the accused.
Conviction
Sm
AhSCC 685.
h3
2014Cr LJ 378
(Utknd). 1975).
humar Kundi ate of Uttara
State of v Uttarakhand
195 9 (w.e.f.
I September
ct 40 of 1973, section 9 (w.e.f. I November
38 of
1975,
section