The 5th International

Sustainability Symposium
by: Omar Alshbli
Instructor: Leen Hiasat
Comparing industry standard building-level
environmental assessment methods.
• Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
LEED, designed by the USGBC, is a popular green building certification system. It regulates sustainable building
design, construction, operation, and maintenance to reduce environmental impact and improve occupant health.
Construction professionals value LEED accreditation, which shows a building's sustainability. LEED's success is due
to various factors. First, it takes a holistic approach to building performance, encompassing energy efficiency, water
conservation, materials selection, interior environmental quality, and site planning. LEED fosters environmental
awareness and integrated design by addressing these topics. LEED emphasizes environmental and sustainability
concerns. It promotes renewable energy and energy-efficient buildings to minimize energy use. LEED encourages
water conservation through efficient fixtures, rainwater gathering, and water reuse. Sustainable, low-impact materials,
waste reduction, and recycling standards address material choices. Ventilation, daylighting, and pollution management
assure occupant comfort, health, and productivity. Finally, LEED promotes sustainable site development,
transportation, and ecosystem conservational awards points for achieving standards in several categories. Certified,
Silver, Gold, and Platinum indicate superior sustainability performance. LEED certification requires meeting certain
requirements and earning optional credits. Documentation and on-site verification by LEED-accredited experts or
Green Raters evaluate projects. Sustainability techniques and environmental concerns have changed LEED's
evaluation methodology. By upgrading its scoring system, it promotes innovation and improvement. LEED now
certifies projects for new construction, existing buildings, commercial interiors, and neighborhood improvements. In
conclusion, LEED is a thorough and well-known green construction certification system that emphasizes
sustainability. It integrates energy efficiency, water conservation, materials selection, indoor environmental quality,
and site planning. Projects are awarded points for completing particular requirements and receiving different levels of
certification. LEED's ingenuity and development have made it a leader in sustainable Constructionline. (LEED,2023)
Comparing industry standard building-level
environmental assessment methods.
• Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM)
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental evaluation Method) is a UK-developed sustainability evaluation
and certification system. It assesses and rates building environmental performance based on sustainability. BREEAM
encourages sustainable design, construction, and operation. BREEAM's multi-dimensional sustainability strategy is its major
feature. It evaluates energy, water, materials, waste, ecological effect, indoor environmental quality, and transportation.
BREEAM's comprehensive perspective of a building's sustainability performance supports integrated design. BREEAM
prioritizes energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction. It encourages renewable energy, energy-efficient buildings, and
energy conservation. BREEAM recommends water-efficient fixtures, rainwater collection, and water reuse systems.
Sustainability, life cycle evaluation, and waste management govern materials selection. Ventilation, illumination, thermal
comfort, and low-toxicity materials determine indoor environmental quality. BREEAM evaluates site ecology, biodiversity, and
habitat conservation. mobility and accessibility are assessed to promote sustainable mobility and reduce the building's traffic
and pollution. BREEAM projects receive points for satisfying requirements in many areas. Design and construction documents,
post-construction assessments, and on-site inspections are assessed. Pass, Good, Very Good, Excellent, and Outstanding
certifications indicate growing sustainability performance. BREEAM has variants for new construction, existing structures, and
community developments. BREEAM's sustainability evaluation method adapts to new environmental issues and best practices.
Recognizing and rewarding initiatives that exceed standards stimulates creativity and progress. Training and relationships with
individuals and organizations help BREEAM enhance industry knowledge exchange and cooperation. BREEAM is a thorough,
well-known sustainability evaluation and certification methodology. It emphasizes energy efficiency, water conservation,
materials selection, indoor environmental quality, ecological effect, and transportation. Projects are scored and certified using
the assessment system. BREEAM's innovation and development help promote sustainable construction techniques.
(BREEAM,2023)
Comparing industry standard building-level
environmental assessment methods.
• Green Star:
The Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA) established Green Star to assess and certify the environmental performance of
Australian buildings and communities. It promotes sustainable practices throughout a project's lifespan, from design through
operation and maintenance. Green Star emphasizes sustainability holistically. It evaluates environmental, social, and economic
issues. Management, Indoor Environment Quality, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Land Use and Ecology, Emissions, and
Innovation comprise the system. A well-rounded evaluation framework is created by covering all areas of sustainability. Green Star
prioritizes energy efficiency and carbon reduction. It promotes renewable energy, energy-efficient buildings, and energy
conservation. Water reuse, efficient fixtures, and stormwater management are all important. Sustainable materials, recycling, and
responsible sourcing are also evaluated. Air, natural light, thermal comfort, and acoustics affect indoor environmental quality.
Green Star's land use and ecology category promotes biodiversity, ecosystems, and green areas. Sustainable transportation,
accessibility, and connection lessen transportation's environmental effect. Points determine Green Star ratings. Meeting category
standards and sustainability objectives earns projects points. Points define the project's accreditation level: 4 Stars (Best Practice),
5 Stars (Australian Excellence), or 6 Stars (World Leadership). The system may be customized for various project kinds and
sizes, ensuring flexibility and application. Green Star evolves to handle new environmental issues and industry advances. The
system adopts new research, technology, and best practices. Green Star rewards innovative initiatives that exceed sustainability
standards. To maintain openness and credibility, certification requires third-party examination and verification. The Green Building
Council of Australia established Green Star, a complete sustainability grading system. Its sustainability strategy encompasses
environmental, social, and economic factors. Energy efficiency, water conservation, materials selection, indoor environmental
quality, transportation, and other sustainability factors are prioritized. The points-based certification levels represent the project's
sustainability performance. Green Star's invention and development help promote sustainable construction techniques in Australia.
GBCA. (2023).
Comparing industry standard building-level
environmental assessment methods.
• Green globes:
GBI's Green Globes sustainability assessment system and building certification program. It evaluates and promotes sustainable,
energy-efficient, and comfortable buildings. Sustainable building design, construction, and operation are adaptable and feasible
with Green Globes. Green Globes is user-friendly and flexible. Its web-based evaluation tool lets project teams go at their own
speed towards certification. Green Globes helps users choose and implement sustainable techniques depending on project needs
and goals. Green Globes assesses a building's environmental performance in numerous areas. Energy, Water, Resources,
Emissions, Indoor Environment, and Project Management. The system evaluates energy efficiency, renewable energy integration,
water conservation, waste management, indoor air quality, occupant comfort, and project environmental effect. Green Globes
awards points for sustainable criteria. The method offers a full examination and flexibility in strategy selection. Project teams can
choose from several categories and receive points. A third-party assessor verifies self-assessment. Green Globes emphasizes
improvement and post-occupancy evaluation. The concept encourages owners and operators to regularly examine and improve
building performance. Post-occupancy review helps the building meet sustainability goals throughout its lifetime. Green Globes
values stakeholder participation and collaboration. It engages building occupants, facility managers, and other stakeholders in
sustainability activities and decision-making. This strategy encourages shared sustainability responsibility and improves the
certification program. Finally, the Green Building Initiative's Green Globes grading methodology is adaptable and practical. User-
friendliness, flexibility, energy efficiency, water conservation, interior environment, and project management are its primary traits.
The point system lets project teams pick tactics that meet their aims. Green Globes ensures certified buildings' environmental
performance via continual improvement and stakeholder interaction. GBI, (2023)
Comparing industry standard building-level
environmental assessment methods.
• Estidama:
Abu Dhabi's Urban Planning Council (UPC) created Estidama, a sustainability effort and building assessment system. It promotes
sustainable development and builds a greener Abu Dhabi. Estidama—Arabic for "sustainability"—represents the emirate's
sustainable future. Estidama prioritizes sustainability holistically. It includes environmental, social, economic, and cultural factors.
Estidama balances these variables in creating and operating communities to achieve real sustainability. Estidama assesses project
sustainability in numerous aspects. Environmental, economic, social, and cultural sustainability are covered here. The Pearl Rating
System evaluates the project based on credits and criteria. Estidama's environmental pillar evaluates energy, water, waste, and
ecological effect. To decrease building and community environmental impact, it promotes renewable energy, effective water
management, and sustainable construction. The economic component assesses project viability and long-term value. Life-cycle
cost analysis, economic feasibility, and job creation are considered. Estidama encourages economic development projects that
benefit the local economy.The social pillar improves inhabitants' lives. It promotes community participation, accessibility, health,
and well-being. Estidama promotes dynamic, inclusive communities that stimulate social interaction, active lifestyles, and resident
well-being. Abu Dhabi's strong cultural character is preserved via the cultural pillar. It promotes traditional design, local materials,
and cultural traditions in the built environment. Estidama's structures and communities reflect the region's cultural values and
foster a feeling of place and identity. Estidama's Pearl Rating System is credit-based. Projects' sustainability ratings are based
on their scores for achieving pillar requirements. Five pearls indicate the greatest level of sustainability. Estidama additionally
stresses performance monitoring and assessment. To maintain building and community performance, it promotes building owners
and operators to measure and report energy, water, trash, and other sustainability indicators. Overall, Estidama is an Abu Dhabi
Urban Planning Council sustainability effort. It uses the Pearl Rating System to evaluate sustainability and considers
environmental, economic, social, and cultural considerations. Estidama supports sustainability, energy efficiency, water
conservation, community participation, and cultural heritage in Abu Dhabi. UPC. (2023).
environmental Areas of emphasis Main features. While there are some similarities
assessment among these certification
methods systems, each has its own unique
areas of emphasis and criteria.
LEED and BREEAM have
Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy and Atmosphere, LEED's success is due to various factors. First, it takes a holistic broader coverage across various
LEED
Materials and Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality, approach to building performance, encompassing energy aspects of sustainability,
Innovation efficiency, water conservation, materials selection, interior including site, energy, water,
Regional Priority environmental quality, and site planning. LEED fosters
environmental awareness and integrated design by addressing
materials, and indoor
these topics. environment. Green Star shares
similarities with LEED and
BREEAM Management, Health and Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, BREEAM's multi-dimensional sustainability strategy is its major BREEAM but also includes a
Materials, Waste, Land Use and Ecology, Pollution feature. It evaluates energy, water, materials, waste, ecological
specific focus on emissions.
effect, indoor environmental quality, and transportation.
BREEAM's comprehensive perspective of a building's Green Globes is more flexible
sustainability performance supports integrated design. and customizable, allowing
Management, Indoor Environment, Quality, Energy, Transport, Green Star evolves to handle new environmental issues and users to prioritize areas based on
Green Star
Water, Materials, Land Use and Ecology, Emissions, Innovation industry advances. The system adopts new research, technology, their specific sustainability
and best practices. Green Star rewards innovative initiatives that goals. Estidama is specific to
exceed sustainability standards. To maintain openness and
credibility, certification requires third-party examination and
Abu Dhabi and places emphasis
verification. on integrated development,
sustainable planning, energy and
water efficiency, and indoor
Green Globes Energy Efficiency, Water, Indoor Environment Quality, Green Globes is user-friendly and flexible. Its web-based environment quality.
Sustainable Materials, Site and Location, Waste Management evaluation tool lets project teams go at their own speed towards
certification. Green Globes helps users choose and implement
sustainable techniques depending on project needs and goals.
Overall, these certification
systems aim to address the key
aspects of sustainable
Estidama Integrated Development Process Estidama additionally stresses performance monitoring and construction and promote a
Sustainable Planning, Energy Efficiency, Water Efficiency, assessment. To maintain building and community performance, it balanced approach to
Materials and Resources, Indoor Environment Quality, Innovation promotes building owners and operators to measure and report
energy, water, trash, and other sustainability indicators.
environmental, social, and
economic considerations in the
built environment.
 Assessment methods for materials and
components
• Forest Stewardship Council (FSC):
International non-profit Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) advocates responsible forest management. It was founded in 1993 to
fight deforestation and its environmental and social repercussions. FSC certifies forests for environmental, social, and economic
sustainability. FSC emphasizes responsible forest management. It sets environmental, social, and economic forest management
principles. FSC-certified forests promote ecological integrity, biodiversity, local community rights and well-being, and long-term
economic sustainability. FSC accreditation emphasizes numerous concepts and criteria. These are: Forest Management: FSC
evaluates forest management techniques for environmental, social, and economic impact. Environmental Impact: FSC assesses
how forest activities affect ecosystems, including water quality, habitat conservation, and invasive species prevention. Community
Relations and Indigenous Rights: FSC confirms that forest management respects local community rights, includes them in
decision-making, and promotes their social and economic well-being. FSC provides safe working conditions, fair salaries, and
worker rights in forestry operations. Legal Compliance: FSC enforces national and international rules to prevent illicit logging and
promote responsible trading. Independent certifying bodies evaluate the FSC. These authorities assess forest management
techniques against FSC's strict requirements. On-site audits, stakeholder discussions, and document checks comprise the
evaluation. FSC certification allows the forest to use the mark on its goods. Regular audits assure compliance. FSC certification
covers forest management and the supply chain. This guarantees that FSC-labeled timber and paper originate from properly
managed forests. In conclusion, the non-profit Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certifies good forest management. FSC analyzes
forests using strict environmental, social, and economic criteria. Consumers can trust FSC-certified products to support sustainable
forestry and reduce deforestation. (FSC, 2023)
 Assessment methods for materials and
components
• Cradle to Cradle (C2C) Certification:
Cradle to Cradle (C2C) is an innovative design framework and certification method for creating sustainable goods and systems. It
was presented in William McDonough and Michael Braungart's book "Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things."
From product production to disposal or reuse, C2C offers a holistic approach to sustainability. Cradle to Cradle emphasizes "waste
equals food." C2C advocates a circular economy where resources are continually recycled. It promotes the creation of waste-free
items that can be disassembled and reused.C2C prioritizes "the five goods": Material Health: C2C eliminates toxic chemicals in
products to protect human health and the environment. Material Reutilization: C2C supports the use of materials that can be
endlessly recycled or biodegraded without degrading or becoming contaminants. Renewable Energy: C2C promotes the use of
renewable energy sources in product manufacturing and operation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Water Stewardship: C2C
encourages water stewardship and reduces manufacturing water use. Social Fairness: C2C analyzes labor conditions, community
participation, and benefit distribution while designing goods and systems. Cradle to Cradle rigorously evaluates goods and
materials against its concepts and standards. Independent certifiers analyze the product's material composition, manufacturing
procedures, energy consumption, water management, and social issues. The product's performance in each quality category
determines its certification level: Basic, Bronze, Silver, Gold, or Platinum.C2C accreditation gives manufacturers feedback and
advice to enhance their goods and processes. It supports exchanging product components and environmental effect information.
Companies and designers may produce environmentally friendly, healthy, resource-efficient, and socially responsible goods by
using the Cradle to Cradle strategy. The framework questions waste and promotes regenerative and restorative design and
manufacturing. (Braungart, M., & McDonough, W,2002)
 Assessment methods for materials and
components
• Green Seal:
Green Seal certifies ecologically friendly products and services. Since 1989, it has represented environmental leadership. Green
Seal sets strict requirements and evaluation criteria to promote sustainability and reduce industry environmental impact. Green
Seal prioritizes science-based and open certification. It evaluates products and services across their life cycles, from raw material
extraction through use and disposal. Cleaning goods, paints, construction materials, hotels, restaurants, and more meet Green Seal
criteria. Scientific research, industry input, stakeholder involvement, and public comment form Green Seal's criteria. Each product
category has standards for resource conservation, pollution reduction, energy efficiency, and health and safety. Technology and
best practices update these criteria. Green Seal tests products and reviews paperwork. Green Seal certifies items that satisfy its
standards. The product's components, performance, packaging, and environmental management are evaluated. Green Seal may
also provide on-site audits. Green Seal designation benefits producers, customers, and the environment. It gives producers a
trustworthy eco-label that distinguishes their products and shows their sustainability. Green Seal accreditation helps consumers
choose eco-friendly items. Green Seal's transparency and ongoing development pushes producers to innovate and adopt
sustainable practices. In conclusion, Green Seal's third-party certification of many products and services promotes environmental
sustainability. Its rigorous review method, scientific approach, and clear criteria provide a marketplace with ecologically friendly
solutions. Green Seal promotes sustainability by linking industry practices with environmental goals. (Green Seal, 2023)
 Assessment methods for materials and
components
• ENERGY STAR:
In 1992, the EPA launched ENERGY STAR, a voluntary energy efficiency initiative. It identifies and certifies energy-efficient
goods, buildings, and behaviors to minimize greenhouse gas emissions. The program covers residential, commercial, industrial,
public, and consumer electronics and appliances. ENERGY STAR is well-known and trusted. It symbolizes energy-efficient goods
and activities globally. EPA-certified ENERGY STAR products and buildings exceed high energy efficiency standards. This award
encourages individuals and companies to make energy-efficient decisions, saving energy and the environment. ENERGY STAR
targets numerous energy-saving aspects. These include promoting energy-efficient technology, energy management techniques,
energy conservation awareness, and guidance and tools to assist individuals and businesses make educated decisions. ENERGY
STAR requires thorough testing and verification. Products are tested by EPA-approved independent labs. These labs evaluate
items' energy efficiency using standards. Products must outperform conventional models in their category to be ENERGY STAR
certified. ENERGY STAR's Portfolio Manager lets building owners and operators benchmark energy performance. Energy
Performance Scores (EPS) are calculated using energy use and building data. ENERGY STAR certifies buildings with EPS 75 or
above. Energy efficiency is compared to similar structures nationally. ENERGY STAR promotes energy-efficient practices with
manufacturers, merchants, utilities, and government organizations. It helps businesses and people save energy expenditures by
providing training, technical assistance, and educational tools. ENERGY STAR had a big influence. It has cut energy prices and
greenhouse gas emissions by billions since its launch. ENERGY STAR goods and buildings have averted almost 4 billion metric
tons of greenhouse gas emissions, according to the EPA.ENERGY STAR encourages energy efficiency across different industries.
Consumers and companies may trust its rigorous certification scheme to choose energy-efficient goods and structures. ENERGY
STAR saves energy, money, and the environment. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2023)

Component level affect on Building Level
Compone Certificates Impact on the building’s level
nt Level
FSC Describes sustainable wood goods and how such items help to meeting the
criteria for the certificates that are related to sustainable materials. And also
demonstrates how the collecting of products has a smaller impact on the
environment.
C2C promotes continuous development and innovation by giving comments and
directions to manufacturers on how to enhance their goods and processes. This
helps the manufacturers achieve optimal results. It fosters the exchange of
information about the product's material constituents as well as its influence
on the environment, which helps promote transparency and promotes
transparency.
Green Products and services can get the Green Seal of Approval based on how well
Seal they perform ecologically. Utilizing materials with the green certification
ensures that a structure is more sustainable, has a lower carbon footprint, and
uses less energy.
ENERGY Utilizing Energy Conservation Methods Appliances that have earned the
STAR ENERGY STAR label might make it easier for a building to earn energy-
related certifications. In addition to upholding the standards for energy
efficiency in building level certifications
Building-level schemes like LEED, BREEAM,
and Green Star rely heavily on these evaluation
methodologies and certifications. They help
improve a building's environmental performance
and sustainability by mandating eco-friendly
materials and fittings. In order to promote the
use of certified items and sustainable building
methods, several programs at the building level
offer credits or points for the use of such
products.These certifications and assessment
tools are incorporated into building-level
schemes to improve resource conservation,
environmental protection, occupant health, and
energy efficiency. They offer a system for
measuring and awarding buildings according to
how well they protect the environment, which
pushes the construction sector to adopt greener
methods. It's worth noting that various schemes
at the building level may have varying standards
and recognition for these evaluation
methodologies. In order to guarantee that their
projects adhere to the specified environmental
goals and standards, project teams must
thoroughly examine the requirements of the
certification system they are seeking.
 How the various environmental assessment methods and
their approaches towards reducing a building’s impact.
1. LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is a certification method for environmentally friendly buildings that takes into account several factors throughout a structure's life
cycle. Site sustainability, water efficiency, energy efficiency, material choice, IEQ, and innovation are all highlighted. The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating
system incentivizes the use of sustainable materials and technology, promotes the efficient use of energy and water, and generally helps the environment. (LEED,2023)
2. The Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) is an all-encompassing approach to rating a building's sustainability in terms of its impact on the
environment and occupants' health and happiness. BREEAM promotes green practices including recycling, composting, using locally sourced materials, and using less energy overall. Through
IEQ guidelines, it also prioritizes the health and happiness of building occupants. (BREEAM,2023)
3. Green Star is an Australian sustainability grading system used to evaluate the impact that various construction and community initiatives have on the local environment. Management, indoor
environment quality, energy, transportation, water, materials, land use, emissions, and innovation are just few of the topics covered. Green Star is an environmental rating system that
encourages eco-friendly construction methods, resource conservation, and product purity. (Green Star,2023)
4. Energy efficiency, water conservation, material choice, waste management, indoor air quality, and site management are only some of the sustainability performance indicators used in the Green
Globes evaluation and certification system. Green Globes makes use of an in-depth web-based assessment tool that walks users through an examination and offers up suggestions for
enhancement. It stresses adaptability and interaction in the process of evaluating green buildings. (GBI,2023)
5. Estidama is an Abu Dhabi sustainability program with the goal of improving the environmental performance of all new construction and major renovations in the emirate. Energy efficiency,
water savings, material choices, IEQ, and site sustainability are only few of the areas that are taken into account when assigning a building a rating in the Estidama Pearl Rating System.
Estidama advocates for the use of renewable energy sources and environmentally responsible urban planning. (UPC,2023)
All of these ways have one thing in common: they aim to lessen a building's negative effects on the environment by using different tactics and standards. Energy efficiency, water conservation,
eco-friendly materials, trash removal, IAQ, and site sustainability are just few of the many concerns that are addressed. These approaches push the construction sector toward more sustainable
practices, foster innovation, and stimulate constant progress since they establish benchmarks and assessment frameworks. Different criteria, characteristics, and geographical applicability
characterize each evaluation strategy. Some approaches may be more concerned with energy efficiency, while others may give more weight to issues of general sustainability or to problems unique
to a given location. Location, objectives, stakeholder needs, and available resources are only few of the elements that should be taken into account when selecting an evaluation strategy.
Incorporating fresh information and developments in sustainable practices, these assessment methodologies are always evolving. They motivate the construction industry to become more
sustainable by promoting green practices, boosting building efficiency, and enhancing the quality of the built environment. In general, the many different approaches to environmental evaluation
show how complex the issue of sustainability is in the building sector. These strategies are essential in lowering the environmental effect of buildings and leading the industry towards a more
sustainable future as they promote responsible resource management, energy efficiency, and occupant well-being.
 Why Green Globes
1. Flexibility and Customization: Green Globes provides a more flexible and customizable approach compared to other certification systems. It allows users to
prioritize sustainability areas based on their specific project goals and objectives. This flexibility can be beneficial when addressing unique project requirements
or constraints.

2. Ease of Use: Compared to other certification systems, Green Globes is commonly viewed as being more user-friendly and straightforward to use. Accessible to a
variety of construction experts and stakeholders, it offers a web-based evaluation tool that walks them through the certification process.

3. When compared to other certification methods, Green Globes is often regarded as being more efficient and economical. Self-evaluation and a shortened
assessment procedure are hallmarks, as is the reduced reliance on external experts. This has the potential to shorten certification times and cut expenses.

4. Green Globes emphasizes real-world applications of sustainability strategies and promotes a well-rounded strategy to green architecture. It considers the
practicality and affordability of sustainable techniques, opening it up to a wider variety of projects.

5. Post-Occupancy Evaluation and Ongoing Performance Monitoring are Priorities for Green Globes. To ensure the building's continued viability and efficient
operation, it urges owners to monitor and enhance the building's performance on a regular basis.(GBI,2023)
Before deciding on a certification system, it is vital to perform a thorough examination of the project's needs, objectives, and geographical context. Sustainable
decision-making may be aided by consulting with sustainability specialists and taking into account the demands of all stakeholders.
 Building Information

• Located on AL-Bayader st.

Amman, Jordan smile dental
clinic. The clinic works from
Sunday-Thursday 9:00 am-
5:00 pm
Building observation
 Assessment of the clinic environmental performance • Observation: there was
free water in big
(questionnaire/Water ) containers, for customers
questionnaire Answers
• Assessment: The clinic has taken
some measures to save water, such
1- The fixtures in the building used, does it save water Yes, to an extent. as using fixtures that save water to
consumption? some extent and promoting lower
water consumption through faucets
2- Do you save any amount of water either by not excessive Yes. with timers. However, there are
water or using products that does not excessive water? missed opportunities for rainwater
collection and greywater recycling,
3- Do you use any water saving approaches? Like promoting Yes, we use faucets that have which could further reduce water
lower water consumption or using saving water taps and equipment? timers on them that disconnect consumption and promote
water after 5 sec. sustainable water management
practices. Overall, the water usage
4- Do you collect rainwater? No. is moderate compared to others,
but improvements can be made.
suggestions: Install rainwater harvesting systems
5- Do you recycle grey water? No. to collect and utilize rainwater for non-potable
purposes, reducing reliance on freshwater
sources. Implement greywater recycling systems
6- Do you think that the water efficiency changed in the last No. to reuse water from sinks and showers for
irrigation or other non-potable uses. Consider
three years? upgrading fixtures to more water-efficient
models and promoting water-saving practices
7- Did the water bills in winter and summer change? Yes, the bills in the summer is among staff and patients. Conduct regular water
audits to identify and address any areas of
usually higher than the winter, excessive water consumption.
almost the double
 Assessment of the clinic environmental performance • Observation: there was no
facility manager
(questionnaire/Management ) • Assessment:. The clinic's
questionnaire Answers management lacks specific roles or
responsibilities for reducing energy
and water consumption,
1. Do you have someone that is responsible for reducing energy and No
water consumption and/or buying water and energy reduction gadget and
purchasing energy-saving gadgets,
maintaining them? and handling toxic or hazardous
products. However, there is a
2- Do you have someone responsible about the reduction in use and No recycling system for medical waste
proper handling of toxic or hazardous products?
and a policy to hire from the local
residents. The focus on local hiring
3- Is there a regular cleaning schedule available and posted for the No. positively contributes to the
public restrooms that includes a verification system?
community but falls short in terms
of broader environmental
4- Are there signs posted to promote handwashing in public Yes management practices.
restrooms? Suggs: Designate a staff member or team
responsible for monitoring and reducing energy
and water consumption, as well as purchasing
5- Do you have an automated emergency notification system for your Yes. and maintaining energy and water-saving
facilities? gadgets. Establish a system for proper handling,
storage, and disposal of toxic or hazardous
products, ensuring staff safety and environmental
6- Do you have a recyclable system for you facilities? Yes, but only for the protection. Develop and implement a regular
medical waste. cleaning schedule that includes verification
systems for public restrooms, promoting
cleanliness and hygiene. Consider implementing
7- Do you have a policy to hire from the local residents? Yes a waste management plan that includes recycling
programs for non-medical waste and encourages
proper segregation and disposal practices.
 Assessment of the clinic environmental performance • Observation: there was no
humidity
(questionnaire/Indoor environmental quality) • Assessment: The clinic has
questionnaire Answers implemented some measures to
enhance indoor environmental
1- Do you use a sound insulating system No
quality, such as reducing glare
through window shades, providing
2- Are there noise limits set? No external lighting for safe access,
and using safe materials. However,
3- Do you use solutions to reduce glare? No. there are areas for improvement,
such as the absence of a sound
masking system and noise limits.
4- Is external lighting available in the corridors and car parks for safe access? Yes
The clinic has plans to control
pests and ensures proper
5- Are there time clocks and/or photo sensors for exterior lighting? Yes. maintenance of external air vents.

6- Are safe materials used? If dangerous materials are used, are they kept in a proper Yes, there’s medical materials used and they Suggs: The clinic has implemented some
manner and in special warehouses? And employees are not exposed to it? Is there anyone responsible are kept safe in a dry place and the direct measures to enhance indoor environmental
for this material? sun light can’t control and its temperature quality, such as reducing glare through window
controlled. shades, providing external lighting for safe
7- Is there a plan to control pests inside the building? Yes access, and using safe materials. However, there
are areas for improvement, such as the absence of
a sound masking system and noise limits. The
clinic has plans to control pests and ensures
8- Are the external air vents ensured that they are intact and free of any corrosion? Yes. proper maintenance of external air vents.

9- how many hours do you keep the AC turned on? 4 hrs. per day
 Assessment of the clinic environmental performance • Observation: was on the
main road
(questionnaire/Site ) • Assessment: The clinic benefits
questionnaire Answers from its location, with pedestrian
accessibility and proximity to
1) Are roof drains disconnected from sanitary or combined sewers? No
public transportation stops.
However, it lacks certification
from a recognized site certification
2) Has the site achieved certification from nationally or regionally No program and has not conducted a
recognized site certification program within the last four years? transportation assessment to
encourage alternative modes of
3) Has a transportation assessment has been done? A transportation No. transportation. The clinic provides
assessment should address occupant needs for alternative transportation such as transportation services for staff,
cycling, walking, van and car pools, public transportation - all relative to which helps reduce car
minimizing single-vehicle occupancy? dependency.
Suggs: Seek certification from nationally or
4) What is the distance to the closest public Transportation stop for 50 meters away from the regionally recognized site certification programs
unoccupied buildings? to demonstrate a commitment to sustainable site
building. development and operations. Conduct a
transportation assessment to identify
5) Is there a main or secondary building entrance located accessibly to Yes. opportunities for promoting alternative modes of
pedestrian traffic and public transit stop(s)? transportation, such as cycling, walking, and
carpooling. Encourage staff to use public
6) Is there public or private transportation service available for Yes transportation by providing incentives like transit
building staff for commuting passes or implementing a carpooling program.
Install additional bicycle racks or facilities to
promote cycling as a sustainable transportation
7) Are there other measures to reduce car dependency (e.g. car- Yes option for staff and patients.
pooling, purchase of transit passes?
 Assessment of the clinic environmental performance • Observation: LED bulbs
• Assessment: The clinic benefits
(questionnaire/Energy ) from its location, with pedestrian
questionnaire Answers accessibility and proximity to
public transportation stops.
However, it lacks certification
1 Is there an energy-efficient opaque envelope? Yes from a recognized site certification
program and has not conducted a
transportation assessment to
2 Are there energy-efficient windows? No encourage alternative modes of
transportation. The clinic provides
transportation services for staff,
3 Has the current performance and condition of the building envelope No. which helps reduce car
been assessed? dependency.

4 What percentage of the building interior is installed with LED 100%

and/or fluorescent lighting (quantified by floor area)?

Suggs: Conduct an energy audit to identify

5 What percentage of the common and amenity areas are installed
with LED and/or fluorescent lighting (quantified by floor area)?
6 Is there a central (BAS) that encompasses all systems that affect
building energy performance, lighting (may be a standalone control system), and
thermal comfort?
7 Is temperature setback based on occupancy used?
100% energy-saving opportunities and prioritize
energy-efficient upgrades. Consider installing
energy-efficient windows to improve insulation
No and reduce heat gain/loss. Assess the building
envelope's performance to identify and address
any areas of energy leakage or inefficiency.
Install a central Building Automation System
(BAS) to integrate and control various systems,
Yes optimizing energy performance and comfort.
Explore the possibility of incorporating
renewable energy sources like solar panels or
 Assessment of the clinic environmental performance
(questionnaire/energy )
questionnaire Answers

8 Do heating systems that use steam boilers employ? No

9 Does the building have high-efficiency water heating equipment? No

10 Are there hot water saving devices such as low-flow or automated Yes
faucets?

11 Are there other energy-saving HVAC systems or measures being No.

used?

12 Do elevators and escalators use energy reduction measures? No.

13 Have steps been taken to analyze and reduce peak energy demand? No.

14 Are renewable onsite energy sources being used? No.

15 What percentage of the building's total energy is provided by 0%

renewable onsite energy sources?
 Assessment of the clinic environmental performance • Observation: high quality
materials
(questionnaire/Materials ) • Assessment: The clinic uses
questionnaire Answers standard wallcovering products
that do not contribute to raising
the building's efficiency. There is
1) What are "Wallcovering Products" used for? Does it help in raising Does it help in raising the
the efficiency of the building? also a lack of consideration for
efficiency of the building? materials that can be recycled or
No. the wall covering reused during demolition. The
products used are the clinic does not prioritize the use
standard type which does of environmentally friendly
not raise the efficiency of materials or reusable materials.
the building.
Suggs: Prioritize the use of environmentally friendly
2) Can materials be used in construction or furniture in case of No. materials in construction and interior design,
demolition be recycled or disposed of? considering factors such as recycled content, low
VOC emissions, and sustainable sourcing. Implement
a comprehensive waste management plan that
3) Are environmentally friendly materials used so that they are safely No. includes recycling, reusing, and disposing of
reused? materials properly during construction, renovation,
and demolition. Consider seeking certifications such
as Cradle to Cradle (C2C) or GREENGUARD for
materials and products, ensuring their environmental
sustainability and indoor air quality compliance.
Assessment of the clinic environmental
performance (before)
Assessment of the clinic environmental
performance (before)
Assessment of the clinic environmental
performance (after)
Assessment of the clinic environmental
performance (after)
Comparison
Comparing between two similar projects
The other project Located in Madaba, Jordan Al-Basma Medical center is a family owned clinic, located on
theOmar Ben-Al khattab St. The building has little sustainable aspects to it. choose BREEAM for the certification
for the reason of The Building Research Establishment (BRE) Environmental Assessment Method was created in
1990 and is an international certification standard for buildings and projects. Pass, Good, Very Good, Excellent,
and Outstanding are the BREEAM ratings that may be achieved. It’s category: Management, Health & Wellbeing,
Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land use & Ecology, Pollution
Comparing between two similar projects
 Comparing between two similar projects
• Certification:
The dental clinic: has been assessed using the Green Globes system, Energy
efficiency, water conservation, material choice, waste management, indoor air
quality, and site management are only some of the sustainability performance
indicators used in the Green Globes evaluation and certification system. Green
Globes makes use of an in-depth web-based assessment tool that walks users
through an examination and offers up suggestions for enhancement. It stresses
adaptability and interaction in the process of evaluating green buildings.
The general clinic: choose BREEAM for the certification for the reason of The
Building Research Establishment (BRE) Environmental Assessment Method was
created in 1990 and is an international certification standard for buildings and
projects. Pass, Good, Very Good, Excellent, and Outstanding are the BREEAM
ratings that may be achieved. It’s category: Management, Health & Wellbeing,
Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land use & Ecology, Pollution.
 Comparing between two similar projects
• Questionnaire:
The dental clinic: the questions were about the Water, Management,
Indoor Environmental Quality, and More Are Just Some of the Topics
Covered in the Dental Clinic's Questionnaire. It covers topics such as
water use, water conservation methods, management duties, indoor air
quality.
The general clinic: the questions were about the Management, Health
& Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land use &
Ecology, Pollution. The purpose of the questions is to extrude the
environmental performance of the clinic to get a good idea of the
consumption of the clinic
 Comparing between two similar projects
Dental clinic
general clinic

Over all: The dental

clinic is consuming
305kWh and after
optimizing it went
almost to half of the
consumption for
about 165kWh,
while The general
clinic is consuming
211kWh and after
optimizing it went
almost to half of the
consumption for
about 95kWh.
before after before after
 Comparing between two similar projects
Dental clinic
general clinic

Lighting Efficiency:
On the back dental
clinic, it shows that if I
use the option, it makes
it go down to a -140
kWh/yr. compared to
the general clinic (111
to 95), which is not that
big of a difference
compared to the dental
clinic, which is barely
anymore efficient than
the general clinic.
before after before after
 Comparing between two similar projects
Dental clinic Plug load efficiency:
general clinic
Energy efficiency at
the plugs refers to
how well energy is
used to power
appliances and other
loads. Electronics and
home appliances are
included, however
home lighting and
HVAC systems are
not. Starting at 305
kWh for the dental
clinic against 114
kWh for the general
clinic, the dental before after
before after
clinic eventually used
just 165 kWh while
the general clinic
used only 95 kWh.
 Comparing between two similar projects
Dental clinic
general clinic

Operating Schedule: A
building's normal
operating hours are
indicative of how its
tenants typically make
use of the space. 305 to
165 against 149 to 111,
the dental clinic is open
five days a week from
9 am to 5 pm.

before after before after

 Comparing between two similar projects
Dental clinic
general clinic

HVAC: Depending on
the building's size and
location, different
HVAC systems will be
more or less efficient.
They use a lot of
energy, with the dental
clinic using between
305 and 165 kWh and
the general clinic using
between 139 and 114
kWh.

before after before after

Over all both of the clinics could really reduce there environmental foot print by following the given suggestion,
were they can cut there consumption to half. Based on the given information and analysis the general clinic seems
to be consuming way less almost a 100 kWh. Less than the dental clinic were the general clinic had a better
consumption rate in the following: lighting efficiency, plug load efficiency, HVAC, operating schedule giving it a
better score
 Assessment of the clinic environmental
performance
1. Water: The clinic has taken some measures to save water, such as using fixtures that save water to some extent and promoting lower water consumption through
faucets with timers. However, there are missed opportunities for rainwater collection and greywater recycling, which could further reduce water consumption
and promote sustainable water management practices. Overall, the water usage is moderate compared to others, but improvements can be made.
2. Management: The clinic's management lacks specific roles or responsibilities for reducing energy and water consumption, purchasing energy-saving gadgets,
and handling toxic or hazardous products. However, there is a recycling system for medical waste and a policy to hire from the local residents. The focus on
local hiring positively contributes to the community but falls short in terms of broader environmental management practices.
3. Indoor Environmental Quality: The clinic has implemented some measures to enhance indoor environmental quality, such as reducing glare through window
shades, providing external lighting for safe access, and using safe materials. However, there are areas for improvement, such as the absence of a sound masking
system and noise limits. The clinic has plans to control pests and ensures proper maintenance of external air vents.
4. Site: The clinic benefits from its location, with pedestrian accessibility and proximity to public transportation stops. However, it lacks certification from a
recognized site certification program and has not conducted a transportation assessment to encourage alternative modes of transportation. The clinic provides
transportation services for staff, which helps reduce car dependency.
5. Energy: The clinic has energy-efficient opaque envelopes and LED or fluorescent lighting throughout the building. However, there is a lack of energy-efficient
windows, assessment of building envelope performance, central control systems, high-efficiency water heating equipment, and energy-saving HVAC systems.
The clinic has not analyzed or taken steps to reduce peak energy demand and does not use renewable onsite energy sources.
6. Materials: The clinic uses standard wallcovering products that do not contribute to raising the building's efficiency. There is also a lack of consideration for
materials that can be recycled or reused during demolition. The clinic does not prioritize the use of environmentally friendly materials or reusable materials.
 Suggestions for improving the environmental
performance
1. Water: Install rainwater harvesting systems to collect and utilize rainwater for non-potable purposes, reducing reliance on freshwater sources. Implement greywater
recycling systems to reuse water from sinks and showers for irrigation or other non-potable uses. Consider upgrading fixtures to more water-efficient models and
promoting water-saving practices among staff and patients. Conduct regular water audits to identify and address any areas of excessive water consumption.
2. Management: Designate a staff member or team responsible for monitoring and reducing energy and water consumption, as well as purchasing and maintaining
energy and water-saving gadgets. Establish a system for proper handling, storage, and disposal of toxic or hazardous products, ensuring staff safety and
environmental protection. Develop and implement a regular cleaning schedule that includes verification systems for public restrooms, promoting cleanliness and
hygiene. Consider implementing a waste management plan that includes recycling programs for non-medical waste and encourages proper segregation and disposal
practices.
3. Indoor Environmental Quality: Install a sound masking system to reduce noise levels and create a more comfortable and private environment for patients. Set noise
limits for different areas of the clinic to minimize disturbances and maintain a peaceful atmosphere. Explore additional strategies to reduce glare, such as adjustable
blinds or shading devices, to enhance visual comfort for staff and patients. Install time clocks and photo sensors for exterior lighting to optimize energy usage and
ensure lights are only active when needed. Regularly inspect and maintain ventilation systems to ensure proper air quality and comfort for occupants.
4. Site: Seek certification from nationally or regionally recognized site certification programs to demonstrate a commitment to sustainable site development and
operations. Conduct a transportation assessment to identify opportunities for promoting alternative modes of transportation, such as cycling, walking, and
carpooling. Encourage staff to use public transportation by providing incentives like transit passes or implementing a carpooling program. Install additional bicycle
racks or facilities to promote cycling as a sustainable transportation option for staff and patients.
5. Energy: Conduct an energy audit to identify energy-saving opportunities and prioritize energy-efficient upgrades. Consider installing energy-efficient windows to
improve insulation and reduce heat gain/loss. Assess the building envelope's performance to identify and address any areas of energy leakage or inefficiency. Install
a central Building Automation System (BAS) to integrate and control various systems, optimizing energy performance and comfort. Explore the possibility of
incorporating renewable energy sources like solar panels or geothermal systems to reduce reliance on non-renewable energy.
6. Materials: Prioritize the use of environmentally friendly materials in construction and interior design, considering factors such as recycled content, low VOC
emissions, and sustainable sourcing. Implement a comprehensive waste management plan that includes recycling, reusing, and disposing of materials properly
during construction, renovation, and demolition. Consider seeking certifications such as Cradle to Cradle (C2C) or GREENGUARD for materials and products,
ensuring their environmental sustainability and indoor air quality compliance.
 Evaluation of how environmental assessment methods respond to
different environmental concerns and improve the performance of the
building.
The environmental performance of buildings may be evaluated and enhanced with the use of environmental assessment techniques. They offer a methodical way to
evaluate factors that contribute to sustainability, such as energy use, water conservation, air quality inside the building, the choice of building materials, and the layout
of the property. These techniques aid in locating problem areas and directing decision-making toward more long-term solutions.LEED, BREEAM, Green Star,
Estidama, and Passive House are just a few of the environmental evaluation methodologies that each have its own set of criteria, metrics, and grading systems for
determining a building's impact on the environment. They each focus on a unique facet of sustainability while addressing a variety of environmental issues. Here is a
quick breakdown of these approaches:
1. LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is a certification system for environmentally friendly buildings that has gained widespread acceptance on
a global scale. Site sustainability, water efficiency, energy efficiency, material choice, IEQ, and innovation are all highlighted. When it comes to environmental
issues, LEED covers a lot of ground and pushes for high performance in construction projects.
2. Commonly used in the United Kingdom, BREEAM stands for the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Management, energy,
water, health and well-being, pollution, transportation, materials, waste, ecology, and innovation are only few of the criteria on which buildings are evaluated. To
assess and enhance the environmental performance of buildings, BREEAM offers a complete framework.
3. Energy efficiency, water conservation, materials and resources, interior environmental quality, site development, and project management are all factors considered
in the Green Globes assessment of a building. Users may tailor their sustainability aims and tactics with Green Globes' adaptable and user-friendly approach to
building evaluation. Green Globes encourages sustainable building methods and is mindful of a wide range of environmental issues. Enhancements to interior
environmental quality, water savings measures, environmentally friendly material choices, and energy efficiency are all encouraged. Green Globes is an assessment
and feedback system designed to encourage the use of sustainable building materials and methods.
 Evaluation of how environmental assessment methods respond to
different environmental concerns and improve the performance of the
building.
4. The Green Building Council of Australia created a method for assessing buildings based on their impact on the environment called Green Star. Energy efficiency,
water conservation, material choice, IEQ, and innovation are only few of the sustainability-related topics covered. Green Star gives standards for improving
environmental performance and includes a variety of rating methods catered to different types of buildings.
5. Estidama is an effort in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, with the goal of fostering long-term sustainability. Using criteria including "sustainability," "energy,"
"water," "materials," "indoor environment," and "operations," it assigns a rating to a building. Estidama takes into account the unique environmental problems and
cultural settings of its geographic location.
6. Passive House refers to a specific standard for buildings that emphasizes low energy use and high thermal comfort. It places an emphasis on using stringent design
practices to reduce energy consumption to an absolute minimum without sacrificing comfort within the building. The Passive House standard was developed to
encourage the construction of ultra-efficient structures worldwide.
Environmental performance of buildings may be measured, benchmarked, and improved upon with the use of these evaluation techniques. As a result of their efforts,
architects, designers, and developers are better equipped to make decisions that will lessen their projects' negative effects on the environment. To reiterate, issues like as
adoption, compliance, and continuing monitoring are crucial to the success of these evaluation strategies. Furthermore, the scope, regional applicability, and
environmental problems addressed by various approaches may vary.
 References
•BRE Global Ltd. (n.d.). BREEAM: Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Retrieved from https://www.breeam.com/

• U.S. Green Building Council. (2023.). LEED: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. Retrieved from https://www.usgbc.org/leed

•USDM UPC. (2023). Estidama. Retrieved from https://usdm.upc.gov.ae/en/estidama

•USGBC. (2023). Leadership in energy and environmental design. Retrieved from https://www.usgbc.org/leed

•Green Building Council Australia. (2023). Green Star. Retrieved from https://new.gbca.org.au/green-star/

•Kubba, S. (2012) Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction: LEED, BREEAM, and Green Globes. 1st ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

•U.S. Energy Information Administration (2021). Buildings Energy Data Book. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2018/bc/cfm

•Berge, B. (2009) The Ecology of Building Materials. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.

•Halliday, S. (2008) Sustainable Construction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

•Braungart, M., & McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press.

Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. (n.d.). What is Cradle to Cradle Certified™? Retrieved from https://www.c2ccertified.org/about

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2016). Cradle to Cradle design. Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/what-is-the-circular-economy/cradle-to-cradle

•BREEAM. (n.d.). BRE-BREEAM. [online] Available at: https://www.breeam.com/ [Accessed 4 April 2023].

•USGBC. (n.d.). Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. [online] Available at: https://www.usgbc.org/leed [Accessed 4 April 2023].

•GBCA. (n.d.). Green Building Council Australia – Green Star. [online] Available at: https://new.gbca.org.au/green-star/ [Accessed 4 April 2023].

•UPC. (n.d.). Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council – Estidama. [online] Available at: https://usdm.upc.gov.ae/ [Accessed 4 April 2023].

•Passive House Institute.

•Hwang, B. G., & Ng, W. J. (2013). A review of sustainability assessment methods in the built environment. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 7(3), 623-628.

• Green Building Council Australia. (2022). Green Star. Retrieved from https://new.gbca.org.au/green-star/

• Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council. (2023.). Estidama. Retrieved from https://upc.gov.ae/en/estidama

• Forest Stewardship Council. (n.d.). About FSC. Retrieved from https://www.fsc.org/en/about-fsc

• Green Seal. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.greenseal.org/about/

• Green Seal. (n.d.). Standards. Retrieved from https://www.greenseal.org/certification-standards/

• Green Seal. (n.d.). Certification Process. Retrieved from https://www.greenseal.org/certification-process/

 References
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). ENERGY STAR. Retrieved from https://www.energystar.gov/

• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). How a Product Earns the Label. Retrieved from https://www.energystar.gov/about/how_a_product_earns_the_label

• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). ENERGY STAR for Buildings and Plants. Retrieved from https://www.energystar.gov/buildings/about-us

• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). ENERGY STAR for Products. Retrieved from https://www.energystar.gov/products/about-us