Improving Writing Abilityofsecondaryschoolin Thail EFLusingadvanceorganizer Model

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/352905684

Improving Writing Ability of secondary school in Thai EFL Classroom using


Advance Organizer Model

Conference Paper · July 2021

CITATIONS READS

0 121

4 authors, including:

Andi Retno Budiarty Sitthipon Art-in


Khon Kaen University Saga University
5 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS    15 PUBLICATIONS   72 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Nuchwana Luanganggoon
Khon Kaen University
10 PUBLICATIONS   60 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Model curriculum of Malcolm Skillbeck View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Andi Retno Budiarty on 02 July 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Improving Writing Ability of secondary school in Thai EFL Classroom
using Advance Organizer Model
Andi Retno Budiarty Nazaruddin1, Sitthiporn Art-In2, Nuchwana Luanganggoon3
Department of Curriculum & Instruction1,2, Department of Educational Measurement and
Evaluation3
Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University
Khon Kaen, Thailand
ebudiarty@kkumail.com

Abstract
This research was to find out the improvement of the students’ writing ability by using advance
organizer model (graphic organizer). The researcher conducted by using classroom action research
(CAR) with implementing plan, act, observe and reflection. The target group of this research were
36 seventh grade students. The instrument that applied for this research 2 lesson plan, graphic
organizer (mapping), writing test, and observation form to record the students’ behavior during the
research. Analyzing the data used to find mean score Mean (X̄), Standard Deviation (S.D.) and
percentage of students who passed the writing criteria. The students had gotten better in writing
performance and understanding the materials. In quantitative data analysis, it could be seen that the
mean score (X̄) 15.53 of 20 and S.D. 2.56. The percentage of students who passed the criteria cycle
1, cycle 2 and post-test were 66.67%, 77.78% and 80.56% respectively, which showed substantial
improvements in the students’ writing skills before, during, and after the implementation of advance
organizer model (graphic organizer).

Keywords – Writing Ability, Advance Organizer Model, Graphic Organizer

Introduction
There are four ability that must be the knowledge to compose compositions
learned when learning English: listening, that carry their thoughts and ideas.
speaking, reading, and writing. All these Richards and Renandya (2002) in
language abilities are often supported by Strydom & Epiney (2012) The educational
other language components, such as writing method is claimed to consist of four
vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation. fundamental stages. Planning, drafting,
Receptive abilities here suggest that we review and editing are being carried out.
obtain the language and the sense of Different research activities are suggested
interpreting the message, that is, reading for each stage that can direct the acquiring
and listening and successful abilities that knowledge of specific writing capabilities.
include speaking and writing, are In the planning process. For example, the
interpreted by the language we have learned teachers will help their students to develop
to construct a message through expression. their writing abilities by offering activities
According Oshima (2006) writing is not such as talent storming, clustering and
easy, especially academic writing to speedy free writing to produce thoughts.
improve this skill requires study and Writing appears to be a core problem
practice. Writing, as we know, is a special for the students as writing calls for a variety
skill that enables authors to bring their of skills relating to linguistic learning and
thinking to communicate in words in a the process of writing requires the thought
meaningful way and mentally with the process. After information is collected by
message. reading, speaking, analyzing and reviewing
Unzueta (2009) in Juniarti, Sofyan, & data, students must connect the information
Kasmaini (2017) points out that “Students with their idea in a thought process in order
have bad way at writing skills and lacked to convey it in writing. It is not unexpected

120
that writing in a foreign language or second the use of correctly relevant and inclusive
language is more complicated and difficult. materials that are secure and discriminated
Students in the second language English from associated conceptual systems in the
(ESL) or in the foreign language (EFL) learner’s cognitive structure.
English (EFL) are facing an equally similar In advance organizer model there are
situation; they have to do a lot to write or many types that applicable in learning
write a text. Some studies found it difficult process. There are many kinds of Advance
for many students to write English as a Organizer Model:
foreign language (EFL). In addition, 1) Expository: Increase organizers
understudies can also express their thinking supply college students a vast thinking of
in paper with great structure and syntax. the lesson’s motive before the lesson
Understudies, therefore, agree that begins. For example, a trainer may
composing is problematic. The teacher has additionally inform students what the
to adjust how they illustrate that they are lesson’s dreams are: “We’ve talked about
creative and enjoyable, so when they what habitats are and why some animals opt
experience it, it satisfies them. There are 5 for to stay in exceptional locations than
components in writing that should different animals do.
determine content, organization, 2) Narrative: Improves organizers
vocabulary, language use and mechanics involve storytelling. At the commencing of
for student skills. the class, the instructor may inform an
Writing assessment refers to the interesting story that relates to essential
criteria in English writing were content, ideas in the lesson
organization, language use, vocabulary and 3) Skimming: Other kind of
mechanics. From each criteria the highest enhance organizer. The teacher may also
score is 4 and 1 for lowest score, into those ask students to skim over a reading,
criteria the students’ work assessed that met focusing on highlighted information, such
the criteria. Nodousha (2014) said as captions or chapter headings.
Assessment aims to support and improve 4) Graphic Organizer: Structure
the students learning. Assessing of writing facts visually or in pictures. They are
seems to be a very delicate activity. commonly one-page forms with a lot of
There are many methods that can clean areas so they’re convenient for
apply in the classroom, Advance organizer students to skim earlier than the lesson.
is one of that method. Advance organizer The researcher used graphic
model principle helps positive teaching and organizers model as type of method for
gaining knowledge of process. It is an improving writing student’ ability. In
effective form of instruction for teaching Advance organizer model teachers may
the principles of science. Ausubel clarified help to organize the tools that help connect
that Advance Organizers Learning Theory the known and unknown of students’
is a pedagogical method for applying the knowledge with framework for helping
concepts of progressive distinction and students to understand what it is they will
integrative reconciliation that includes the be learning in the classroom. Actually, this
use of correctly appropriate and inclusive method will help the teacher to organize the
materials in the cognitive framework of the material that will be giving to the students.
learner that are protected and discriminated Different classes of language students are
against from associated conceptual widely agreed to have various difficulties in
systems. Ausubel described that Advance learning languages.
Organizers Learning Theory is a Coburn (2003) in Vásquez & Coudin
pedagogical strategy for enforcing (2018) defines graphic organizers as
principles of progressive differentiation and diagrams that signify the relationships
integrative reconciliation which involves between facts, ideas, and concepts. They

121
come in many forms, inclusive of displays that use lines, arrows, and various
flowcharts, webbing, thought mapping, and designs to describe information and the
matrixes. They are now not equipped in a relationships among concepts (Darch &
linear structure in accordance to a sequence Carnine, 1986) as cited Condidorio (2010).
like traditional outlines; instead, they carry In each type of Graphic organizer that
relationships via a visible structure that are separated into many kinds of form. The
linked and ordered thru a conceptual researcher used main idea web to collect
framework. the data that include many types inside of
Juniarti (2017) studied about The main idea web. These kind as follow:
Effect of Using Graphic Organizer to 1) Cluster web mapping: Many
Students’ Writing Ability. This expertise is words or ideas as possible relating to the
aimed at investigating the influence of the stimulus subject matter to construct a
use of Graphic Organizer on the writing cluster diagram (and then writes them
skill of students. This quest was designed second-level thoughts in circles attached to
once as an almost experimental study. the main subject)-this first step is like
Anggraeni & Jolanda (2018) explain creating a superstar diagram.
on their research about using graphic
organizer as a media in students’ writing
project. It is instructors assist the students
to organize their writing which are learnt to
construct and enhance their writing skill.
Graphic organizer is a super creative media
for evaluating and contrasting text or story
and will be used effortlessly in each kind of
subject matter to assist the scholars
recognize the quite a number distinction
between the texts or stories.
Wangzom & Nipaporn (2019) Figure 1. Web cluster mapping
studied about The Use of Graphic 2) Hamburger Mapping: A kind of
Organizers in Teaching History to Grade writing method used to help students create
Seven Students in Bhutan. In order to find a paragraph or essay is the hamburger
out the use of image organizers in teaching model, which is often called the sandwich
history to grade seven students in Bhutan, model. The use of this hamburger model
this mixed method research was conducted. will help students write concentrated,
The two primary objectives of the research concise paragraphs because it fits the
were to assess the information acquired format of the standard paragraph-the
from accomplishments and to analyze the "introduction-supporting information-
opinion of students closer to the use of conclusion" format.
picture organizers in the study of History.
In Graphic Organizer, the researcher
tries to give a new insight about learning
with visual way, the student can more focus
about the information that the students want
to know, and this model teacher as
instructor to guide the students to get new
information that can link with the students’
prior knowledge and new material to get
new information. Graphic organizers grant
college students with a shape for summary
ideas. Graphic organizers are spatial Figure 2. Hamburger mapping

122
Applies to the teaching stage by using As a fresh view of graphic organizer as
a basic rote learning advance organizer a strategy to define the rhetorical functions
model, as learners are encouraged to link representing the flow of ideas typical of
new information to old knowledge (what argumentative texts through a series of
they already know). The step following as strategy applications. It was also intended
below; to collect the impressions of the potential
1) Step one: The teacher clarifies the benefits and drawbacks of graphic
goals of the lesson, introducing the advance organizers from students.
organizer model, and encouraging the
awareness of students who contribute to the Methodology
lesson. This research belongs to Classroom Action
2) Step two: Introduction of the Research (CAR) implemented by adopting
learning task or learning material and concept of Kemmis and McTaggart cycles
explicit organization and logical order of (1988). There were four steps of research to
learning material, and the instructor be conducted named Plan, Action,
attempts to connect previous learners with Observation and Reflection (PAOR) as
what they will get in this step. figured below:
3) Step three: Implementing the
knowledge what they learned that no longer
matches the categories, make comparisons
between classes, and alternatively practice
students to new businesses, the teacher
should present statistics about a couple of
examples to improve the thoughts further.
In either case, the students now have a
standard thinking of way of life that can
assist the students to arrange.
Advance organizer is one of the
teaching models which applicable with Figure 3. Kemmis and McTaggart Cycle of
learning process. It has cognitive Classroom Action Research.
instructional strategy used to promote the
learning and retention of new information. In line planning, the researcher
In this research using advance organizer conducted investigation first prior to carry
became an independent variable that used out the research. It has identified what
for improving English writing students’ student’s problem in writing. In this
ability, the applying advance organizer research, the researcher and English
model in this research by applied the teachers as collaborators formulated
teaching step model in the classroom and problems related to students' writing skills
using graphic organizer in part of advance based on observations, then identified the
organizer model for helping the research problem. After that, the researcher
improvement. The researcher combines has planned and carried out actions,
those of model and kind of that model as a evaluated and reflected on the actions
helping in this research. carried out in the research. Regarding
Considering the problem statements acting, it is the implementation of planning
above, the objective of the research is to to the teaching situation. In terms of the
study the improvement of the students’ observing, it is conducted by the researcher
writing ability by using Advance Organizer as an observer to observe all the activities
Model by passing the criteria at least 75% occurred during the research and the effects
of the students pass the test. of the action given during the research.
Concerning reflection, the effects of the

123
action are reflected, evaluated and a. Plan: The researcher did
described to improve the situation in the discuss with the head of English department
next cycle. who held 7th grade students, observation in
1) Plan the classroom before applying the research.
In this step the researcher done pre b. Act & Observe: The
activities before conduct the research to researcher did observation in the classroom
collect the data. In plan stage identifying before applying the research, after that the
the problem based on the observation, after researcher started teaching process using
that prepare the instruments that will use in Advance Organizer Model as a teaching
collecting the data. method. And after the cycle the cycle the
2) Act & Observe researcher did writing test to get the score
In this stage implements the model and can see the improvement.
to improve writing ability by using c. Reflect: Evaluate the data
Advance organizer model. The material collection process in each cycle to get
will be adjusted by the students’ textbook problem and solution that could be used as
that already given by the teacher to the an improvement in the next cycle.
researcher. Data analysis done by finding the
3) Reflect mean score (X), Standard Deviation (SD)
In this step, the researcher analyze and Percentage. The researcher found the
the weakness that the researcher gets in improvement of the students’ writing
observing. After analysing the weakness, ability by using Advance Organizer Model
the researcher looks for the problems (Graphic Organizer) by passing the criteria
solving for the weakness. In this step also, at least 75% of the students pass the test. at
the researcher has to think what he has to do least the students have to meet the criteria
in the next step. and got 75 score of the writing assessment
The target group of this research is that given to the students in each cycle and
approximately 200 students and for sampe the last after all cycle implemented.
group target of this research conducted at
the seventh grade or Mattayom suksa Finding and Discussion
students of Suksasart Demonstration The researcher presents the
School in the 2020/2021 academic year. numerical and observation data obtained
The total numbers of sample are 36 during the study in the results section (2
students. The research instruments cycles). Otherwise, the discussion explains
consisted of 2 big lesson plans implemented and boldness the result. In addition, the
into 250 minutes period of teaching and 2 researcher sees the students’ work and
mappings of graphic organizer that given to discuss between grouping and individual
the students in each cycle. work in different cycle. The data of post-
There were three expertise who test showed to see improve the students’
validates the instruments, 2 English lectures writing ability.
from faculty of education and 1 English
teacher from Suksasart demonstration
School. All the instruments were checked 1) Plan
by direct consultation to the expertise and In this stage, the researcher made
getting some suggestions. This research lesson plan that was applicable in the
was done at second semester of academic classroom.
year of 2020/2021. The research began in 2) Act & Observe
the first of January to February 2021. In each cycle of this research
Collecting the data, these following conducted 50 minutes in the classroom per
steps were during the process; 1 period. From 2 cycle, the researcher done
with online and onsite, the researcher taken

124
seriously concern about those issues,
because the teaching process was switched Improvement of writing
by online based on the regulation that ability of the students
informed the school to switch the learning using Advance Organizer
process as outbreak (Covid-19) cases Model (Graphic Organizer)
second wave that happened in Thailand. In
each period the research implements of 100 77.78% 80.56%
66.67%
using Advance Organizer Model for
teaching method in the class. And observe 50 33.33%
22.22% 19.44%
was held in each period that was helped by
research assistant. The researcher observed 0
in the moment of teaching and learning Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Post test
process that started from opening, main Passed Not Passed
activity and closing the class, the researcher
made 2 kinds of observation form for Figure 4. Percentage of improvement
student and teacher. From the figure of percentage score
3) Reflect in each cycle showed the percentage of each
The researcher concluded that cycle until post-test, even not significance
writing a final text on the given topic of improving, however in first cycle the
limited their creative thinking process and score was collected by working group and
the students did not have much information another cycle doing as individual test that
about the topic given. cause the researcher could not compare the
Before the graphic organizer was score of cycle 1 and cycle 2, nevertheless
applied to the Mattayom Suksasart (M1/1), the score that enriched by the students still
They were not identified the text and moving to go improvement. From cycle 1
differentiate the part of the text that they got 66.67% from the total group who
should put when writing text. The students passed, and cycle 2 getting 77.78% and
were not able to develop the text into 80.56% for post-test. and the figure showed
complete organization which included the percentage of the student who did not
introduction, body text or supporting details pass the writing assessments from cycle 1
and conclusion. Almost the students were until post-test seen decreasing in each
confused how to maintain the text as a cycle.
coherence and linked from each part. The result showed the improvement
Meanwhile, after conducting this research, as compared to the previous cycle that the
the students were able to organize the text. researcher did. The assessment of analysing
It was supported by a theory of Egan (1999) for writing ability that emphasized on 5
in Juniarti (2017) which stated that the categories; content, organization,
students can share their information and vocabulary, language use and mechanics.
ideas into labels’ pattern of graphic From the analysis in cycle 1, it found the
organizer and arrange it directly. student typically making mistake in
language use and mechanics, whereas the
language use explained about the
grammatical in language that the students
missed placing the tenses and all about
grammatical. For example, in writing test in
group working at cycle 1, the students used
rarely past tense even though the topic
obviously talked about something that
happened in the past and the students’ work
contained some errors. Besides, on content

125
section the students could present the detail asked to write individually that was
of the writing clearly, but there is a part to different with cycle 1. The students could
another part not linking and difficult to produce understandable descriptive text.
understand. In addition, on part mechanics, The students could maintain about content
some of the students forgot to put the and organization as comprehension text.
correct punctuation on their text, even Despite the fact founded some
comma or full stop. The students still grammatical errors, but the student had
confused to put the marks. The students had several dictions of word when they wrote
limited of vocabularies bank, in term the a text, nevertheless, it was not as much as
students merely used the commonly words. the mistaken in cycle 1. Situation that
The result of writing assessment in conducted the data in cycle 1 was little bit
each cycle that content section still low. complicated with the researcher, the
The students were not able to put situation forces on to collect the data by
appropriate ideas to the topic. Almost the online class, the researcher was afraid the
students wrote to contrasted to the title of data that collected was far from the perfect
the text. It could be seen from the data, as the teaching foreign language
conclusion statement which not suitable to using foreign language would be difficult
the topic. Furthermore, after applying the to explain with the student.
graphic organizer, the students knew what The result of post-test founded
ideas they wanted to write in the text. By improving of students writing ability that
using web cluster mapping in first cycle the students who passed the test 81%. From
were helped the students to put their ideas that result indicated improvement in writing
which appropriate with the topic. It was descriptive using graphic organizer. Mean
proved by Fisher & Schumaker (1995) score that been converted in Cycle 1 (71),
stated that graphic organizer are visuals Cycle 2 (73), and Post-test (78). Advance
displays of key content information which Organizer Model stimulated the students
can help the students to visualize how the dominating the class (student-centred),
content are organized. being more active and getting high
To another support the result from participation in the classroom, even though
Mayer (2000) believed that an advance in cycle 1 conducting online class and
organizer helps to organizer new material limitation of movement in the classroom
by outlining, arranging and sequencing the not getting attraction with the students and
main idea of the new material based on cycle 2 conducting on site in the classroom,
what the learner already knew. In order to thus situation the researcher was maximise
justify this result could be stated that the action of the research, hence to get
graphic organizer have been viewed as both decent data in cycle 2.
cognitive tools and language tools. As Advance Organizer Model
cognitive tools, graphic organizer organizes stimulated the students dominating the class
the information and ideas. (student-centred), being more active and
According to Mohammadi, getting high participation in the classroom,
Moenikia, & Zahed-Babelan (2010) stated even though in cycle 1 conducting online
advance organizers and graphic organizers class and limitation of movement in the
are effective ways to simplify the task by classroom not getting attraction with the
following particular reason the students can students and cycle 2 conducting on site in
provide an overview of a new topic dan the classroom, thus situation the researcher
visually represent links between the was maximise the action of the research,
concept to be learned. hence to get decent data in cycle 2.
In cycle 2, it found that the students Advantages and Disadvantages
could write more clearly than previous during the research in cycle 1 and 2 took by
cycle, however in cycle 2 the students different way. Cycle 1 took in Online class

126
that made the researcher little bit confusing, qualitative and quantitative data, were
but in online class the students can choose presented in this research.
their comfort zone in their home, beside The data showed that the students’
that online class force the students do competence in writing text became higher
creatively doing the task, but in the class is in the end section of this research. It proved
hard to get attention, because there is no enough the effects as well as benefits of
controller in the class. Some of the students using Advance Organizer Model (Graphic
did not turn on their camera that the Organizer) that about the use of web cluster
researcher did not know the students’ mapping and hamburger mapping. That two
expression. of mapping could improve the students’
writing ability, even though that did not
Conclusions show the big number to display the
From the result of the research were improvement. In learning process
carried out in Thai EFL Classroom to immediately upon conducting the data
improve writing ability that conducting appearance of a number of the students’
from January to February 2021 This problems (less ideas, less coherence,
research included Demonstration school of mistaken grammatical, less vocabularies
suksasart in 7th grade students. bank and miss placing of mark text) of
The use of Advance organizer model writing text as descriptive. As a matter of
to improve students’ writing ability was expectation, the second cycle and post-test
seen with regard to the data analysis scores indicated that their previous problem
conducted during this research. The total in writing text could be decreased even not
group of this research were 36 students all recovered perfectly. Nonetheless the
(M1/1). The score obtained from the test students getting confusing to develop their
were taken after the treatment in each cycle ideas, yet Advance Organizer Model
applied and 1 test as the last after the (Graphic Organizer) was able to help to
treatment implementing in 2 cycles. The construct writing ability of the students and
score for passing the test must get 75% the their involvement into the class. Thus, the
students who passed the criteria in each students could follow the class even the
cycle. Two types of evidence, namely materials sometimes difficult for them.

References
Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance Science Learning. New york: St. John
organizers in the learning and Fisher College.
retention of meaningful verbal Fisher., & Schumaker, J. B. (1995).
material. Journal of Educational Searching for validated inclusive
Psychology, 51(5), 267–272. practices: A review of the
Anggraeni, A. D., & Jolanda, H. P. (2018). literature. Focus on Exceptional
Using graphic organizer as a media in Children, 28(4), 1-20.
students ’ writing project. Journal of Juniarti, K., Sofyan, D., Kasmaini. (2017).
English Language Teaching, 2(2), The effect of using graphic organizer
105–111. to students ’ writing ability. Journal
Condidorio, K. (2010). The Usefulness of of English Education and Teaching,
Graphic Organizers in Enhancing 1(1), 48–57.
127
Mayer, R. (2003). Learning and International congress on advances in
Instruction. New Jersey: Pearson nuclear Power Plants, 1(1), 387–395.
Education, Inc. Vásquez, J, M, V., & Coudin, R. Z.
Mohammadi, M., Moenikia, M., & Zahed- (2018). Graphic organizers as a
Babelan. (2010). The role of advance teaching strategy for improved
organizer on English language comprehension of argumentative
learning as a second language. texts. Revista Electrónica
Procedia Social and Behavioral “Actualidades Investigativas en
Sciences, 2(10) 4667-4671. Educación”, 18(2), 1-22.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing Wangzom, Pema., & Chalermnirundorn,
Academic English. New York: Nipaporn. (2019). The use of graphic
Pearson Longman. organizers in teaching history to grade
Strydom, g., & epiney, a. S. (2012). Relap5- seven students in bhutan. St. Theresa
3d results for phase i (exercise 2) of the Journal of humanities and social
oecd/nea mhtgr-350 mw benchmark. science, 5(2), 44–69.

128

View publication stats

You might also like