Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII000399939290155P
PII000399939290155P
PII000399939290155P
ABSTRACT. Bogey RA, Barnes LA, Perry J. Computer algorithms to characterize individual subject WIG profiles
during gait. Arch Phys Med Rehahil 1992;73:835-41.
l Three methods of precisely determining onset and cessation times of gait EMG were investigated. Subjects were 24
normal adults and 32 individuals with gait pathologies. Soleus muscle EMG during free speed level walking was obtained
with fine wires, and was normalized by manual muscle test (%MMT). Linear envelopes were generated from the
rectified, integrated EMG at each percent gait cycle (%GC) of each stride in individual gait trials. Three methods were
used to generate EMG profiles for each tested subject. The ensemble average (EAV) was determined for each subject
from the mean relative intensity of the linear envelopes. Low relative intensity or short duration EMG was removed from
the ensemble average to create the intensity filtered average (IFA). The packet analysis method (PAC) created an EMG
profile from the linear envelopes in successive strides whose respective centroid %GC locations were within t 1S%GC of
each other. Control values for onset and cessation times of individual gait trials were calculated after spurious outliers
were removed. Mean onset and cessation times across subjects for control values and the experimental methods (EAV.
IFA, and PAC) were calculated. Dunnett’s test (p < .05) was performed to compare control and experimental groups in
patient and normal trials. EAV differed from control values for onsets (p < .Ol), cessations (p < .Ol), and durations (p
< .O1) in both normal and patient trials. IFA and PAC had no significant differences from control value means. IFA was
selected for clinical use as automatic analysis could be performed on all trials and a minimum number of decision rules
were needed.
6 I992 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation
Human walking relies on the coordinated action of 28 ogy from substitutive effort. 7“-” Estimates of‘ gait muscle
major muscles to control the jointed trunk and limbs, and action from manual muscle testing may be misleading be-
to generate the forces needed to counter gravity and propel cause the reflex responses of patients during gait are often
the body forward with minimum energy expenditure.’ The different.‘.” Dynamic electromyography (EMG) oKers a
muscles act in groups and most also have more than one means of directly tracking muscle activit! The myoelectric
function. When any of the muscles involved in the gait signal sufficiently parallels the intensity of muscle action to
process do not perform normally, the person’s walking pat- serve as a useful indicator of its mechanical effect.33-39De-
tern may be significantly altered.‘-8 Many types of pathol- lineating the changes in phasing. duration. or magnitude ot
ogy (cerebral palsy, stroke, etc) may decrease the ability of a muscle action associated with a person’s pathological gait
muscle to generate the needed force or create excessive ac- pattern,“,” however, is difficult due to the complexity of
tion at inappropriate times.” Often these abnormalities in- the EMG record. Its multispike. random amplitude qualit]
troduce unusual demands on other musculature. defies simple interpretation. To overcome this limitation.
To diagnose a patient’s gait dysfunction, various meth- multiple processing and interpretive techniques have
ods of measurement of muscle function have been de- evolved.
vised.3~3~6.Y-‘”
Muscle action inferred from either observed or Any clinically relevant representation of an individual’s
instrumented recording of the patient’s walking pattern is EMG profile during gait must consider both the timing and
commonly used. but this does not separate primary pathol- the relative magnitude of the EMG signal. Much of the
previous quantitated definition of muscle action has been
I-mm the Dcpartmcnt 01‘Pathoki”esiology Service. Ranch0 Los Amigos Medical limited to defining the onset and cessation times from the
C‘cnter. Downe). (‘A EMG recording while ignoring the relative magnitude of
fhts worh
Health.
w,is supported
Bethesda. MD
h! grant RO I AM 387 I3 from the NatIonal Institutes of
the signal. 9.13.I~.IX.?O,?h.4?-44
Failure to consider the relative
Suhmmed for puhlicatwn March I. I94I. Accepted in rewed form Septcmher 3. magnitude of the EMG signal may result in properly timed
IW! muscle action of inappropriate intensity being incorrectly
1” orgam~at~m wth whwh the author or one or more of the authors IS associated
ha\ rccelwd or uill rccrwr tinanclal benefits from a commercial party having a direct
labelled as normaL The ability to quantitate the relative
or IndIrect Intwest in the subject matter of this article. No such benefit has heen intensitv of the EMG signal between onset and cessation
conferred dIrectI> upon the author or authors.
times is;mperative for averaging data from multiple strides.
Repnnt reqtwts to Ross A. Bogey. DO. Department of Phywal Medicine and
Rehahditatlo”. 1inwcrslt~of (‘ahfornia. Davis. 4301 \i Street. Room 2030. Sacra- To overcome this shortcoming. others have displayed the
mcnto. C-2 45x17. relative intensity of effort as a mean linear cnbelope of am-
r’ 1941 h) the 4mcncu Congress of Rchahihtation Medicme and the 4mcrican
kadem) of Ph)wat Medicine and Rehabilitation
plitudes at each gait cycle interval.3.h ” I” This ensemble av-
r~~~0~.9s93/9~~730’~-0~~hh$3,il~/I~ eraging (EAV) of EMG relative intensit;,, has been the most
I I
%#MMT for each l%GC interval.” The linear envelope was COMPARE CENTROID LOCATIONS OF
defined by the region bounded by the onset and cessation of NON-DOMINANT LINEAR ENVELOPES
1
WITH THE DOMINANT LINEAR ENVELOPE +
EMG activity and by the curve describing the intensity of AND MAKE TEMPORAL ASSOCIATIONS DETERMINE NEW DOMINANT LINEAR
EMG activity. From the individual linear envelopes, a rep- 1 * i 1 ENVELOPE FROM THE REMAINING
UNASSOCIATED LINEAR ENVELOPES
resentative EMG profile was generated for each subject by NO
each of the three algorithms examined (EAV. IFA, and -I
PAC). Each algorithm used the same EMG data.
For the ensemble average (EAV), the amplitudes of the 4 YES
NO
linear envelopes from multiple strides were summed at
each 1% gait cycle interval and an average intensity per
I ASSOCIATED LINEAR ENVELOPES
IN 150% OF STRIDES?
I----
+ NO EMG PROFILE GENERATED
%MMT
1
CONTROL
EAV
where P represented the location of the linear envelope cen-
troid, P, the location of the individual %GC components.
IFA
and mk the %MMT found at those respective %GC loca-
tions. The linear envelopes in each gait trial were sorted in
PAC
decreasing order of EMG total area. The linear envelope
0 IO 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 with the largest area as determined by integration was
BGC
designated as the dominant packet (fig 3). PAC associated
Fig I-Comparison of the soleus EMC profiles for the EAV, IFA, temporally related linear envelopes in successive strides by
and PAC methods. Linear envelopes are shown for one patient comparing the centroid locations of the remaining (nondo-
performing four consecutive free walking strides.14 Time of con- minant) packets with the timing of the dominant packet in
trol value E:MG activity (CONTROL) is depicted by a horizontal
terms of percent gait cycle occurrence. Linear envelopes
bar. The E:MG profiles for this gait trial as determined by the
three experimental averaging techniques (EAV, IFA, PAC) are
whose centroid occurrence were within i 15%GC of the
presented. Percent gait cycle (%GC) is represented on the ab- dominant packet centroid were considered to be temporally
scissa; individual ordinate scales are divided into 100 l%MMT related to that linear envelope. Mean onset and cessation
increments. End of stance phase is marked by the dashed line at times were calculated for each group of temporally related
62%GC. packets for each subject, and EMG relative intensity at each
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol73, September 1992
838 COMPUTER GENERATED INDIVIDUAL EMG PROFILE, Bogey
STRIDE = In each subject or patient trial. the mean onset and cessa-
I
%MMT tion values from the series of strides were calculated after
1 I
values greater than two standard deviations from the series
I
mean were removed (fig 3). This procedure yielded the con-
2 I
trol values for onset and cessation times for that trial. Exper-
I
imental (EAV. IFA. PAC) and control value across-subject
3 I
mean onset and cessation times for normal and patient pop-
I
4
ulations were computed from the individual onset and ces-
I
sation values. Comparisons between the three analysis
I
CONTROL
methods and the control values were made for onset times,
I
I I I I I I I I I I cessation times, and EMG duration. Total EMG for any
0 IO 20 30 40 50 60 70 GO 90 100
single subject did not differ by more than 5% (x = 3.1%‘)
%GC
regardless of “averaging” method. As a result no further
Fig 3-Determination of reference (“control”) value onset and comparison was made to examine the differences in relative
cessation times. Linear envelopes are shown for one normal sub- intensities profiles between experimental groups. Data for
ject performing four consecutive strides of free speed walking. All
the normal subjects’ and patients’ free speed walking were
strides had consistent cessation times. The first three strides had
consistent onset values. The fourth stride had a delayed onset with
tested separately.
respect to group mean values (>2 standard deviations). The calcu- Statistical analyses were performed using StatView 5 13+
lated onset time for the control value was based on the onset times statistical software. Differences between the experimental
of the first three strides only. Control value cessation time was methods were determined by repeated measures ANOVA.
calculated from the cessation %GC of all four strides. Control A post-hoc Dunnett’s test53 was performed to find signifi-
value EMG duration is depicted by the solid line (CONTROL). cant differences between a control mean and the three ex-
Percent gait cycle is represented on the abscissa; percent manual perimental groups. Significance level for Dunnett’s test was
muscle test is represented on the ordinate for each stride. set at .05.
RESULTS
%GC of the related packets was determined by linear inter-
polation of the individual linear envelopes. All packets not
Normal Subjects
temporally associated with the dominant packet were The ensemble average EMG duration was significantly
ranked by area and the same temporal relationship analysis greater (p < .OI ) than the control group duration in normal
repeated for the remaining linear envelopes. This contin- subjects (fig 4). This increase in EMG duration was the
ued until all possible associated packets (present in 250% of result of significantly earlier onsets (y < .O1) and later cessa-
strides) were grouped. and a representative EMG profile tion times (p < .Ol) by ensemble averaging (table 1). No
was generated by the PAC method for each subject or pa- statistically significant differences were observed for the
tient (fig 1). IFA or PAC methods for any variable tested in the normal
population (table 1).
Statistical Analysis Patient Gait
As a basis for assessing the validity ofthe three methods, a For the patient data. the EAV results were significantly
control value for each individual gait trial was determined. different from control values for onsets (p < .O1), cessations
60.
Fig 4-Soleus muscle EMG
EMG DUR AT ION
duration in 24 normal adults.
@6GCI Duration of soleus EMG ac-
40.
tivity for control values,
EAV, IFA, and PAC meth-
ods for each subject is shown.
20. Subject number is shown on
the abscissa; percent gait cy-
cle duration of soleus activity
04 1 1 I I ! from multiple strides is
0 5 10 15 20 25 shown on the ordinate.
0, control; 0, EAV; , IFA;
SUBJECT * 0, PAC.
Table 1: Comparison of EMG Averaging Methods of Gait Analysis for 24 Normal Adults
_~
Onset Cessation Duration
(1’ < .OI ). and durations (p < .Ol) of EMG activity (table 3). algorithms (EAV, IF,4. PAC) combined timing and relative
In all trials. the duration of EMG activity determined by intensity ofthe EMG signal to create a single subject profile.
ensemble averaging was greater than control values (fig 5). Following the common assumption that people have
The onset times as calculated by ensemble averaging were some inconsistency from stride to stride.54 an average of
consistently earlier than control value onset times and the several strides customarily is calculated to obtain an accu-
EAV cessation times were later in all trials. In contrast to rate representation of the person’s performance. To average
the ensetmble averaging technique, neither the IFA nor the EMG records, the digital values per gait cycle interval
P.4C methods were significantly different in patient trials for each record are summed. Differences in EMG timing
from the control values for any variable tested (table 3). between different strides are not customarily consid-
ered.3,6.11.15.‘8,35.36.46 F
al‘] ure to do so results in small (3%’to
6%GC) but significantly different timing of the beginning
DISCUSSION and end of the normal EMG profile. The repeatability of
The purpose of an EMG recording is to identify the tim- normal function resulted in such consistent onset and ces-
ing and/or relative intensity of muscle function during sation times that these differences have gone unnoticed. In
some activity, either to have a better understanding of nor- contrast. empirical observation of patient records indicated
mal or to diagnose a cause of pathologic function. The tim- that they displayed considerable variation in the timing of
ing of the electromyogram is a necessary but not sufficient the electromyograms during sequential strides even though
determinant of normal muscle function. Examination of the intensity profiles of the muscle action were similar. The
the initial (loading and midstance) soleus activity empha- extended duration of the ensemble average profile for pa-
sires the importance of the EMG relative intensity. Exces- tient trials is an indicator of the variability in onset and
sive amplitude of correctly timed EMG in these gait phases cessation times in successive strides. The cause of this vari-
leads to one of two clinical consequences. In order to ability was not evident, but it might be small inconsisten-
achieve near normal motion at the ankle joint antagonistic cies in the patient’s stride mechanics of the individual gait
activity by ankle dorsiflexors is required. This prolonged cycles. In each case the variability in timing from stride to
co-contraction is not a normal nor desired event. With ex- stride resulted in an increased duration of the “average”
cessive plantar flexor activity, and in the absence of antago- electromyqgram (fig 5).
nistic muscle response. the appropriate ankle rocker is in- The clrmcal significance ofthe artificially extended EMG
hibited anId normal gait is not achieved. With this in mind. record is the functional error it implied and possibility of
the current practice of defining as normal EMG activity stimulating inappropriate clinical management. For exam-
based solely on correct timing 9.12-14.18.26.42.44 shou]d be exam_ ple, the ensemble average record incorrectly identified the
ined more closely. It seems logical that any clinically rele- onset of normal soleus muscle activity as occurring in the
vant analysis of EMG must examine both the timing and initial half of the loading response. This same trend could
relative magnitude of the EMG signal. Each of the tested occur in a single patient trial as a result of the temporal
Table 2: Comparison of EMG Averaging Methods of Gait Data for 32 Individuals With Gait Pathology
Mean and standard dcliation values for controls. EAV. IF4, and PAC methods are shown. l>unnett‘s test I scores (*/I e. .t)!. ‘/I .. .()I ) for COmpriSOn Ot
E IV. IFA. and K&C‘ with control group values are given.
lower extremity and the effect oftendon transfer. J Bone Joint 35. Milner M. Basmajian J. Quanbury ,A. Multifactorial analysis
Surg 195Y:4 I -A: 18Y-208. of walking by electromyography and computer-. Am J Phys
I-1 Csongradi J. Bleck E. Ford WF. Gait electromyography in Med I97 I :50:235-58.
normal and spastic children. with special reference to quadri- 36. Metral S. Cassar G. Relationship between force and intc-
ceps femoris and hamstring muscles. Develop Med Child grated EMG activity during voluntary isometric anisotonrc
Neural I Y7Y:2 1:73X-48. contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol 1% I :46: I X5-9$.
IS Dubo HIC. Peat M. Winter DA. Quanbury AO. Hobson DA. 37. Hof A. Green B. Van Den Berg J. Calf muscle moment. work.
Steinke ‘If Electromyographic temporal analysis of gait: nor- and efficiency in level walking: role of series elasticity J Bio-
mal human locomotion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1976:57: mech lY83;16:523-37.
-I I5-20, 3X. Hof A. Pronk C. Van Best J. Comparrson between EMG to
16. Hershler C. Milner M. .4n optimality criterion for processing force processing and kinetic analysis for the calf muscle mo-
clectromyographic (EMG) signals relating to human locomo- ment in walking and stepping. J Biomech 198720: 367-78.
tion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1978:E25:4 13-20. 3Y. Henriksson J. Bonde-Petersen F. Integrated electromyogra-
17 Kadaba M. Wooten M. Gainey J. Cochran G. Repeatability phy ofquadriceps femoris muscle at different exercise intcnsi-
of phasic muscle activity: performance of surface and intra- ties. J Appl Physiol 3974:36:2 18-20.
muscular wire electrodes in gait analysis, J Orthop Res 40. DeMottaz JD, Mazur JM. Thomas WH. Sledge CB. Simon
I Y85:3:350-9. SR. Clinical study of total ankle replacement with gait analy-
IX. Kalcn V. Adler h, Bleck EE. Electromyography of idiopathic sis. J Bone Joint Surg I979:6 I-.4:976-XX.
toe walking. J Ped Orthop I986;6:3 l-3. -II. Knutsson E, Richards C. Different types of disturbed motor
IY Lyons K. Perry J. Gronley J, Barnes L, Antonelli D. Timing control in gait of hemiparetic patients. Brain 1979: IO2:405-
and relative intensity of hip extensor and abductor muscle 30.
action during level and stair ambulation: An EMG Study. J 31. Mann RA, Moran GT. Dougherty, SA. C‘krmparative electro-
Am Phys Thcr Assn 1983:63: 1597-1605. myography of the lower extremity in jogging. running. and
20 Mann RA. Inman VT. Phasic activity of intrinsic muscles of sprinting. Am J Sports Med 1986: 14:50 I - IO.
the foot. .I Bone Joint Surg I964;46-A:4698 I. 13. Sutherland DH, Cooper L. Daniel D. The role of the ankle
21 Moxharn J, Edwards RHT. Aubier M, DeTroyer A. FarkasG. plantar flexors in normal walking. J Bone Joint Surg !980:62-
Macklem PT.. Roussos C. Changes in EMG power spectrum A:354-63.
(high-to-low ratio) with force fatigue in humans. J Appl Phys- 44. Mann RA, Hagy J. Biomechanics of walking. running, and
inl 19X2:53: 1094-9. sprinting. Am J Sports Med 1980:8:345-Y.
31
--. Perry J. Barnes G. Gronley J. The postpolio syndrome. Clin 45. Arsenault AB. Winter DA. Marteniuk RG. Brlateralism of
Orthop I Y88;233: 145-61. EMG prohles in human locomotion. Am I Phys Mcd
13. Shiavi R. Griffin P. Representing and clustering electromyo- 1986:65:1-16.
graphic gait patterns with multivariate techniques. Med Biol 46. Cavanagh PR. Gregor RJ. Kneejornt torque during the swing
EngComput 1981:19:605-II. phase ofnormal treadmill walking. J Biomech lY75:8:337-44.
74. Shiavi F:. Electromyographic patterns in adult locomotion: a 47. Perry J. Hoffer M. Preoperative and postoperative dynamic
comprehensive review. J Rehab Res 1985:21:85-98. electromyography as an aid in planning tendon transfers in
75. Shiavi R. Bourne J. Holland A. Automated extraction ofactiv- children with Cerebral Palsy. J Bone .IG)int Surg 1977;59-
ity features in linear envelopes of locomotor electromyo- A:53 l-7.
graphic patterns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1986;BME- 4X. Basmajian JV. Stedio GA. A new bipolar indwelling electrode
33:594-600. for electromyography. J Appl Physiol 1962: 17:X49-58.
26 Sutherland D. .4n electromyographic study of plantar flexors 49. Hotfer M. Perry J. Pathodynamics of gait alterations in cere-
of the ankle in normal walking on the level. J Bone Joint Surg bral palsy and the significance of kinetic electromyography in
I Y66:48-A:667 I. evaluating foot and ankle problems. Foot iZnk1e lY83:4: 12X-
‘7 Walmslsy RP. Elcctromyographic study ofthe phasic activity 34.
of peroneus longus and brevis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 50. Torburn I., Perry J, Ayyappa E. Shantield S. Below-knee am-
1977:58:65-Y. putee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pi-
‘X I’ang JF. Winter DA. Electromyographic amplitude normal- lot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990:77:369-X4.
ization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic
51. Perry J. Ireland M, Gronley J. Hoffcr M. Predictive value of
tools in gait analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil I984:65:5 l7- manual muscle testing and gait analysis in normal ankles by
?I.
electromyography. Foot Ankle 1986:6:253-9.
3’) Bajd 7‘. Andrewr B. Kralj A. Katakis J. Restoration ofwalking
57. Perry J. Bontrager E. Antonelh D. Footswitch detinition of
in patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries by use of sur-
basic gait characteristics. In: Kenedi R. Paul J, Hughes J. eds.
face electrical stimulation: preliminary results. Prosthet
Disability. London: The MacMillan Press LTD. 1078.
Orthot l.nternat 1985:9: IO9- I I
53. Kirk RE. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral
30 Conrad B. Benecke R. Carnehl J, Hohne J. Meinck H. Patho-
sciences. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
physiological aspects of human locomotion. Adv Neurol
1968.
I983:39:7 17-26.
54. Arsenault AB. Winter DA. Marteniuk KG. Hayes KC. How
31 Lee K. Johnston R. Electrically induced flexion reflex in gait
many strides are required for the analysis of electromyo-
training of hemiplegic patients: induction of the reflex. Arch
graphic data in gait? Stand J Rehab Med 1986: 18: 133-5.
Phys Med Rehabil 1976:57:3 I l-4.
55. Beasley WC. Quantitative muscle testing: principals and ap-
31 Gage J. Fabian D. Hicks R. Tashman S. Pre- and post-opera-
plication to research and clinical services. Arch Phys Med
tive gait analysis in patients with spastic diplegia: a prelimi-
Rehabil I96 I :42:398-406.
narv report. J Pediatr Orthop 1984:4:7 15-25.
33 Bouisset S, Goubel F. Integrated electromyographical activity
and muscle work. J Appl Physiol 1973;35:695-702. Supplier
34 Gottlietr GL. Agarwal GC. Filtering of electromyographic sig- a. B and L Engineering. I2309 East Florence. Avenue, Santa Fe
nals. Am J Phys Med I970:49: 142-6. Springs, CA 90706.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol73, September 1992