Project : Part design and construction of viaduct and elevated stations from Dahisar to D N Nagar

corridor of Mumbai Metro Rail Project of MMRDA (LINE 2 AC01 & AC02)

Owner : MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Contractor : J.KUMAR - CRTG JV

Client

Title : DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building

Document No. 621 AC01 & AC02 S E DN 8001 R0

Rev Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by

Date of Issue No. Purpose / Remark Initials Sign Initials Sign Initials Sign
30-Oct-20 R0 For Approval PPA RAD AMS

Pages : 1 + 9 Annexures : 1 Total Pages : 11

SPECTRUM TECHNO-CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. Transmittal, repoduction, dessemination

B-201, BSEL Tech Park, Opposite Vashi Railway and/or editing of this document as well as
Station Road, Sector 30A, Vashi, Navi Mumbai, utilisation of its contents and communication
Maharashtra 400703 info@spectrumworld.net thereof to others without express
authorisation are prohibited.
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This design basis report (DBR) pertains to analysis and design methodology for a typical Entry & Exit (E&E) structure of the
Metro Station. Following are representative image of such an Entry-Exit structure one with escalator and the other with lift
for ready reference :

A typical Entry & Exit has either of the two arrangements with three components each -
- Stair - Stair
- Central Landing OR - Central Landing
- Escalator - Lift

Incase if Lift &/Or Escalator has to be placed away from central landing then there is an approach way provided in between.
Stair and Lift are separated from Central Landing by expansion gap; while escalator is simply supported on central landing.
Approaches are also separated by such gap depending upon its length and existing gate locations on site.
The provision of such GAP ensures that each structure remains seismically regular in shape and behaves independently
during horizontal action of forces viz. seismic and wind. Thus each component of stair, escalator, lift and central landing are
analysed as separate structures. As escalator is resting on central landing the load from it is applied on central landing.

2.0 Codes and References

Following are the Codes referred for design -

1 Volume 4 : Design Basis Report-Station "DMRC/MU/LINE2/AC/02" 5 IS:1893-2002 Part-1
2 IS:456-2000 6 IS:13920-1993
3 IS:2911-2010 Part-1/Sec-2 7 IS:875-2015 Part 1,2 & 3
4 IS: 4326 8 IS:1904:2005
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20

3.0 MATERIAL PROPERTIES

3.1 Units
The main units used for design are: [m], [mm], [kN], [kN/m²], [MPa], [°C], [rad]

3.2 Concrete
Compressive Strength fck = 40 MPa Poisson’s Ratio µ = 0.15

Young’s Modulus Density

E is taken as per clause 6.2.3.1 of IS 456:2000 25 kN/m3 for Reinforced concrete
𝐸 = 5000 𝑓 = 31622.78 MPa 24 kN/m3 for Plain concrete
25 kN/m3 for Granite stone
20 kN/m3 for Masonry
Modular Ratio
For Tensile reinforcement = 280/fck For Compression reinforcement = 420/fck
Fire Resistance Requirements
As per National Building Code 2 hours fire rating is recommended for assembly buildings. Fire resistance design
of structure shall conform to Clause 21, Clause 26.4.3 and Fig.1 of IS456:2000. Nominal Cover to meet Specified
Period of Fire Resistance as Per IS 456:2000 –Table 16A.
Values of Covers for various elements
Pile = 50 mm [ IS-2911 PART 1/SEC 2 -2010, clause 6.11.4]
Pile Head = 50 mm
Column = 40 mm
Beam & Wall = 40 mm
Slab = 35 mm

3.3 Reinforcement Steel

Thermo-mechanically treated reinforcement bars of grade 500D (min.) conforming to IS:1786 is adopted. Young’s
Modulus: E= 200000 Mpa
Young’s Modulus E = 200000 Mpa Yield Stress fy = 500 MPa

Diameters [in mm] Density = 78.5 kN/m³

8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 25, 28, & 32

4.0 LOADS & LOAD COMBINATIONS

4.1 Dead Load (DL)

Self Weight of structural components are considered in accordance to material density and actual cross sectional
area.

4.2 Live Load (LL)

As per Volume 4 : Design Basis Report-Station "DMRC/MU/LINE2/AC/02" & IS:875 (Part-2)
- Live load on Central landing concourse level = 5.00 kN/m^2
- Live load on Central landing roof level = 2.00 kN/m^2
- Live load on Staircase = 5.00 kN/m^2
- Live load on Lift Shaft Roof Level = 2.00 kN/m^2

4.3 Super imposed Dead Load (SIDL)

- Weight Floor finish, parapet wall, cladding, escalator dead load etc. are included under this load.
- Dead load of Steel roof (PEB) over staircase, escalator & approach is considered as 100 kg/m^2. This also accounts for the lateral
loads on the PEB structure
- Lift load considered as per Annexure I.
- Cladding load In walls is considered as 1.5 kN/m^2
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20
- Escalator load considered as per discussion in Minutes of Meeting dated on 06.12.2017 is represented below
Top support
Middle support
160kN

160 kN
Lower support
(NOTE : BIFURCATION BETWEEN SIDL & LL IS NOT DONE IN 100 kN
ESCALATOR, TOTAL LOAD IS APPLIED IN SIDL LOAD CASE)

- Floor finish
In Central landing Concourse level
Load of 30 mm Granite stone
Load of 120mm mortar
Total Floor Finish load
Say
= 0.03 x 25 = 0.75 kN/m^2
= 0.12 x 25 = 3.00 kN/m^2
= 3.75 kN/m^2
4 kN/m^2

In Central landing Roof level

Load of 30 mm Granite stone = 0.03 x 25 = 0.75 kN/m^2
Load of 20mm mortar = 0.02 x 25 = 0.50 kN/m^2
Total Floor Finish load = 1.25 kN/m^2
Say 1.5 kN/m^2

In Staircase & Approach = 1.5 kN/m^2

- Railing load in staircase = 0.8 x 2 = 1.6 kN/m

4.4 Wind Load (WL)

Wind loads and Seismic
The Static wind load is considered as per IS: 875-2015 (Part 3). Forces are not considered to
act simultaneously.
Location = Mumbai
Basic wind speed 'Vb' = 44 m/s
( terrain is even with mild slope CAT-1 & slope of terrain is less than 3ᵒ )
K1 = 1.07 [ IS-875 PART 3-2015 TABLE 1]
Design Wind speed 'Vz' = Vb x K1 x K2 x K3 x K4 k2 = 1.05 [IS-875 PART 3-2015 TABLE 2]
= 49.4 m/s k3 = 1.00 [ IS-875 PART 3-2015,Clause 6.3.3]
Pressure at height 'Z' = 0.6 x Vb x Vb k4 = 1.00 [ IS-875 PART 3-2015,Clause 6.3.4]
= 1466.232 N/m^2
Ka = 1.00 [ IS-875 PART 3-2015 TABLE4]
Design Pressure 'Pd' = P z x Ka x Kd x Kc Kb = 1.00 [ IS-875 PART 3-2015 Cl 7.2.1]
= 1466.232 N/m^2 Kc = 1.00 [ IS-875PART3-2015,Cl7.3.3.13]

For individual member as per IS-875 PART 3 -2015 Cl- 7.4.3.2

For eg: For column size = 600 x 600
Column Length = 14.96m
Depth 'D' = 0.6m L/D = 14.96/0.6 = 24.93 [ IS-875 PART 3-2015 TABLE28]
Reduction Factor =0.87 [ conservative considered for L/D = 40]

Load on the member

WIND -Z :
Normal Load = Cfn x p d x K x b Cfn = 2
= 2 x 1.466 x 0.87 x 0.6 = 1.531 kN/m
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20
4.5 Seismic Load (EQ)
The seismic analysis is conducted as per IS: 1893 (Part 1-2002). Ductile detailing is carried out as per
IS:4326 & IS 13920.

As per Volume 4 : Design Basis Report-Station "DMRC/MU/LINE2/AC/02" minimum Ah = 0.09

STATIC ANALYSIS : (SAMPLE CALCULATION IS SHOWN BELOW)

Time period for static analysis
h = 15 m Sample Height of Column
Tx = 0.075*h^0.75 Tz = 0.075*h^0.75
= 0.5716 secs 0.5716 secs

Zone (3) = 0.16

Seismic coefficient Ah = Z Sa I = 0.0389 I = 1.5
* *
2 g R R = 5
Sa/g = 1.62 (Hard soil)
Ah = 0.039 < 0.09

Scale factor for modifying Ah = 0.090 = 2.3148

0.0389
There is no provision in STAAD to input a scale factor to modify the acceleration coefficient in static analysis.
Therefore, while feeding the data in STAAD the Importance factor has been modified as 1.5 x 2.315 = 3.47

Zone (3) = 0.16

I = 1.5 X 2.315
Seismic coefficient Ah = Z Sa I = 0.09 = 3.472
* *
2 g R R = 5
Sa/g = 1.62 (Hard soil)
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS :
Dynamic analysis is performed to obtain the design seismic force by Response Spectrum method.
Coefficient for Response spectrum = Z * I = 0.024 Zone (3) = 0.16
2 R I = 1.5
R = 5

First 6 modes are considered for the Response spectrum as more than 90% of participation [ IS-1893 PART 1-2002
is achieved clause no 7.8.4.2 ]

The base shear produced through response spectrum is scaled to that produced by static [ IS-1893 PART 1-2002
analysis ( min 9% as per DBR) clause no 7.8.2 ]

Damping is considered as 5% for Concrete structures [ IS-1893 PART 1-2002

clause no 7.8.2.1 ]

The final values of scale factor required to scale response spectrum to that produced by static analysis (min 9% as
per DBR) are as follows -
Sample Scale factors SPEC-X = 4.45 SPEC-Z = 5.15 SPEC-Y = 5.15

Storey Drift Limitaiton

The storey drift of structure will be checked as per clause 7.11.1 of IS 1893(1):2002.
Separation between adjacent units
As per clause 7.11.3 of IS 1893(1):2002, to avoid pounding effect between station building & entry/exit structures,
they are separated by a distance of R times the storey displacements calculated as per clause 7.11.1 of each unit
divided by 2
distance between units = (R1∆1 + R2∆2)/2
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20
4.6 Load Combination
BASE PRESSURE COMBINATION
301 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL
302 1.0 DL + 1.0 EQX + 0.3 EQY + 0.3 EQZ
303 1.0 DL - 1.0 EQX -0.3 EQY -0.3 EQZ
304 1.0 DL + 1.0 EQY + 0.3 EQX + 0.3 EQZ
305 1.0 DL - 1.0 EQY -0.3 EQX -0.3 EQZ
306 1.0 DL + 1.0 EQZ + 0.3 EQX + 0.3 EQY
307 1.0 DL - 1.0 EQZ -0.3 EQX -0.3 EQY
308 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 EQX + 0.3 EQY + 0.3 EQZ
309 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL - 1.0 EQX -0.3 EQY -0.3 EQZ
310 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 EQY + 0.3 EQX + 0.3 EQZ
311 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL - 1.0 EQY -0.3 EQX -0.3 EQZ
312 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 EQZ + 0.3 EQX + 0.3 EQY
313 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL - 1.0 EQZ -0.3 EQX -0.3 EQY
314 1.0 DL + 1.0 WLX
315 1.0 DL - 1.0 WLX
316 1.0 DL + 1.0 WLZ
317 1.0 DL - 1.0 WLZ
318 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 WLX
319 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL - 1.0 WLX
320 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 WLZ
321 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL - 1.0 WLZ

ULS COMBINATION
201 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL
202 1.5 DL + 1.5 EQX + 0.45 EQY + 0.45 EQZ
203 1.5 DL - 1.5 EQX -0.45 EQY -0.45 EQZ
204 1.5 DL + 1.5 EQY + 0.45 EQX + 0.45 EQZ
205 1.5 DL - 1.5 EQY -0.45 EQX -0.45 EQZ
206 1.5 DL + 1.5 EQZ + 0.45 EQX + 0.45 EQY
207 1.5 DL - 1.5 EQZ -0.45 EQX -0.45 EQY
208 0.9 DL + 1.5 EQX + 0.45 EQY + 0.45 EQZ
209 0.9 DL - 1.5 EQX -0.45 EQY -0.45 EQZ
210 0.9 DL + 1.5 EQY + 0.45 EQX + 0.45 EQZ
211 0.9 DL - 1.5 EQY -0.45 EQX -0.45 EQZ
212 0.9 DL + 1.5 EQZ + 0.45 EQX + 0.45 EQY
213 0.9 DL - 1.5 EQZ -0.45 EQX -0.45 EQY
214 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQX 0.36 EQY 0.36 EQZ
215 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 EQX -0.36 EQY -0.36 EQZ
216 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQY 0.36 EQX 0.36 EQZ
217 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 EQY -0.36 EQX -0.36 EQZ
218 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQZ 0.36 EQX 0.36 EQY
219 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 EQZ -0.36 EQY -0.36 EQZ
220 1.5 DL + 1.5 WLX
221 1.5 DL - 1.5 WLX
222 1.5 DL + 1.5 WLZ
223 1.5 DL - 1.5 WLZ
224 0.9 DL + 1.5 WLX
225 0.9 DL - 1.5 WLX
226 0.9 DL + 1.5 WLZ
227 0.9 DL - 1.5 WLZ
228 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WLX
229 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 WLX
230 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WLZ
231 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 WLZ
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20

SLS COMBINATION
101 1 DL + 1 LL
102 1 DL + 1 WLX
103 1 DL - 1 WLX
104 1 DL + 1 WLZ
105 1 DL - 1 WLZ
106 1 DL + 1 LL + 0.8 WLX
107 1 DL + 1 LL + -0.8 WLX
108 1 DL + 1 LL + 0.8 WLZ
109 1 DL + 1 LL + -0.8 WLZ

5.0 BASIS OF ANALYSIS & DESIGN

5.1 Analysis Methodology

# STAAD Pro. is used as analysis software to perform analysis. All the components viz.
MonoPile, Pile Head, Column & Beam are modelled in STAAD and analysis results
are extracted to carry out ULS & SLS design using RCDC, Adsec and In-house
design Sheets. Following is the representative image of STAAD Model of Central
landing and Lift -

# Column of required dimensions are considered at corners of lift. The RCC walls are
considered as infill panels, diagonal struts of equivalent stiffness is modelled in
STAAD. Stiffness is calculated as follows -
As per IS:1893-2002
Part-1 clause 7.9.2.3

Sample calculation as follows -

άh = 6.3 Here θ = 66.3 degree
Em=Ec = 5000*√fck t = 300 mm
Wds = 433 mm = 31622.78 N/mm² h = 4450 mm
tds = 300 mm Ic = 3.13E+09 mm4

# Pile Head Top is min. 1.5m below EGL and thickness of Pile Head is 1.5 times dia of pile. Thus Pile
Starts from min. 2.7m below EGL. This is done to avoid most of the UG utilities on site.

# Subgrade modulus is calculated from Table 4 of IS 2911 Part1 /Sec 2

For sample calculation - Highly Weathered Rock N = 50 is taken here (which is most common in bore
log data) & Lateral Soil stiffness is shown for Diameter of Pile (B) - 800mm
# The spring stiffness is applied at 0.3 m below pile head bottom and thus subgrade modulus for
that portion and of Pile head and Column below footpath level is conservatively ignored; even
though top of Pile Head is well below footpath level.

Layer Thk. qu k1 × 10³ Stiffness

Soil layer N qu = N/7.5 (kg/cm²) K = 0.3 k1/(1.5 B)
(m) (kN/m²) (kN/m³) K*0.5
3.0 - 4.0 1.0 35 4.667 458 72000 18000 9000
4.0 - 5.0 1.0 35 4.667 458 72000 18000 9000
5.0 - 6.0 1.0 35 4.667 458 72000 18000 9000
6.0 - 7.0 1.0 50 6.667 654 72000 18000 9000
7.0 - 8.0 1.0 50 6.667 654 72000 18000 9000

# Pile socketing length is based on Geotech Report (usually 1.5 times the pile Dia)
# Slabs in central landing span between beams is designed as one-way or two-way depending upon dimensions.
# Waist slabs of Stair span is designed as one-way between two column locations.
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20

5.2 Design Consideration

Ultimate Limit State (ULS)

# Design criteria for ULS checking is followed as per IS 456:2000, Section 5: Limit State Design & IS 13920:1993

Service Limit State (SLS)

# Crack width check is carried out as per IS-456 (2000) Cl.35.3.2 .The limiting value of crackwidth
is considered as 0.3 mm as per Volume 4 : Design Basis Report-Station "DMRC/MU/LINE2/AC/02"
# Deflection check is done as per Annexure C of IS 456:2000

SUMMARY FOR ULS & SLS DESIGN

FOR ULS LOAD SLS LOAD
Member Confining
Flexure Shear Torsion Crackwidth
Reinforcement
-Cl 6.2 of IS 13920:1993 -Cl 6.3 of IS 13920:1993 - As per Cl 41.3 of -calculated as per ANNEX -Cl 6.3 of IS
IS 456:2000, torsion F of IS 456:2000, Max CW 13920:1993
is added to shear & = 0.3mm is considered
Beam moment, also Cl
-ANNEX G of IS -Cl 40 of IS 456:2000 41.4.3 is also
456:2000 ensured

-Analyzed as per ANNEX -shear reinf. Is not - As per Cl 41.3 of -calculated as per ANNEX NA /-
D of IS 456:2001(For provided, ensured IS 456:2000, torsion F of IS 456:2000, Max CW
Slab DL+SIDL+LL cases only) concrete will take all the is added to shear & = 0.3mm is considered
shear (EQ, wind combo is moment.
not considered)

-Cl 7.3 of IS 13920:1993 -Cl 7.3 of IS 13920:1993 - As per Cl 41.3 of -calculated as per ANNEX -Cl 7.4 of IS
IS 456:2000, torsion F of IS 456:2000, Max CW 13920:1993
is added to shear & = 0.3mm is considered
moment.
-CL 39 of IS 456:2000, -Cl 40 of IS 456:2000
Column Effective length as Fig 26
& 27 of IS 456:2000. (1.2
for sway columns & 2 for
cantilever columns)

-Cl 7.3 of IS 13920:1993 -Cl 7.3 of IS 13920:1993 NA /- -calculated as per ANNEX -Cl 7.4 of IS
-CL 39 of IS 456:2000, F of IS 456:2000, Max CW 13920:1993
Effective length as Fig 26 = 0.3mm is considered
& 27 of IS 456:2000. (1.2 -Cl 40 of IS 456:2000
for sway Pile/columns &
MonoPile 2 for cantilever
Pile/Column)

-Analyzed as per ANNEX -shear reinf. Is not - As per Cl 41.3 of -calculated as per ANNEX NA /-
D of IS 456:2001 (For provided, ensured IS 456:2000, torsion F of IS 456:2000, Max CW
DL+SIDL+LL cases only) concrete will take all the is added to shear & = 0.3mm is considered
Waist
shear (EQ & wind combo moment.
Slab is not considered)

It is designed as a column element (excluding the effect of pile & column reinforcement in pile head)
Pile Head for all ULS load combos. Dimension is taken as Dia of pile + 300mm. (For eg: for 800mm dia pile,
the pile head size will be 1100 x 1100mm). However, depth is 1.2m irrespective of pile dia.

Escalator Escalator pit will be rested on Raft Foundation resting on a strata of minimum SBC of 150 kN/m^2
pit
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20

5.3 Structural Components

MonoPile & Column

# Monopile and Column behave as a single entity. This can be observed in
following representative image showing typical bending moment diagram
in Pile / Column -
# The shape and size of Column and Monopile are different - Pile head is
thus introduced as a transition zone in between.
# The fixity level of Pile is considered at point of maximum bending
moment; which is generally about 2.5m below Pile head top (~ min. 4.0m
below footpath level). Conservatively, fixity level is considered at 3.0m
below Pile head top to accent for unforeseen variable. Thus, fixity level is
effectively min. 4.5m below footpath level at majority of locations.
# Fixity level of Pile is an important parameter in calculating unsupported
length of Pile and Column both (as both are effectively single entity). The
unsupported length of pile & column is difference in level of fixity and to
the first beam level (tie beam or concourse level beam). Effective length
factor is then calculated as per Annexure E of IS:456 depending on end
conditions.
Say for eg :
# In staircase & approaches - Columns in single line (thereby its corresponding Monopile) are considered as cantilever in
transverse direction and effective length factor is considered as 2 in that direction. While frame action is available in
longitudinal direction the effective length factor is calculated from Fig 26 & Fig 27 of IS:456 based on end conditions.
Effectively the pile is considered as free headed in transverse direction & fixed head in Longitudinal direction.
# Escalator is supported by single column at its centre. This column (thereby its monopile) is cantilever and effective
length factor of 2 in both the directions. In this case the pile is considered as Free headed in both directions.
# Central landing columns are generally getting tied at 3 levels viz. Tie level, Concourse level and Roof level. Thus frame
action is available in both directions and the effective length factor is calculated from Fig 26 & Fig 27 of IS:456 based on
end conditions. Pile is considered as Fixed headed in both directions.
# Column is designed for Axial force and bending moment at its junction with Pile Head, while MonoPile is designed for
axial force and maximum bending moment at fixity level. But slenderness moments in both the components is calculated
for same effective length as mentioned above for pile.
# In order to ensure that hinge formation occurs first in column and then in Pile, the interaction ratio in ULS design for
Column is kept significantly higher than that in Pile.
# As effective length of both column and pile are calculated from fixity depth of pile, the confining reinforcement as per
IS:13920-1993 is provided considering that level as the point of fixity. Thus junction of Column & Pile Head doesnot
impart any fixity to column and confining reinforcement is not provided there.
# Pile will be designed for minimum eccentricity of 100mm due to shift & additional eccentricity due to tilt
considering slope of 1:150 [ IS-2911 PART 1/SEC 2 -2010, clause 8.1.2]
# Pile capacity for different Load case types are as follows
Pile capacity for Static Load case = 1 x Pile capacity from Geotech Report
Pile capacity for EQ Load case = 1.5 x Pile capacity from Geotech Report
[ IS-1893 (Part 1):2002, table 1]
Pile capacity for Wind Load case = 1.25 x Pile capacity from Geotech Report
[ IS-1904:2005, Cl 15.1.7]
 Project: Mumbai Metro Line 2A - AC01 & AC02 Prepared by PPA DN No: 621/AC01 & AC02//DN/8001
Title: DBR for Entry-Exit Structures of Station building Checked by AMS Revision: R0
Date 30-Oct-20
5.4 Specifications for Detailing
Pile
Min Long. Reinf. = 0.4% of Cross sectional area [ IS-2911 PART 1/SEC 2 -2010, clause 6.11.1]
Min. Shear Reinf. = 8mm dia @ 150mm C/C [ IS-2911 PART 1/SEC 2 -2010, clause 6.11.4]
Stiffener rings provided = 16mm dia @ 1.5m C/C [ IS-2911 PART 1/SEC 2 -2010, clause 6.11.4]
Minimum no of bars in circular piles = 6 nos. [ IS-2911 PART 1/SEC 2 -2010, clause 6.11.4]
Minimum Longitudinal bar dia = 12 mm [ IS-2911 PART 1/SEC 2 -2010, clause 6.11.4]
Confining Reinforcement is provided as Clause 7.4.7 of IS 13920:1993

Column
Min Long. Reinf. = 0.8% of Cross sectional area [ IS-456:2000, clause 26.5.3.1]
Max. Long Reinf. = 4% of Cross sectional area [ IS-456:2000, clause 26.5.3.1]
Min. Shear Reinf. Is provided as per Cl 26.5.3.2 of IS 456:2000 in zones other than confining zone
Minimum no of bars in Circular columns = 6 nos. [ IS-456:2000, clause 26.5.3.1]
Minimum no of bars in Rectangular Columns = 4 nos. [ IS-456:2000, clause 26.5.3.1]
Minimum Longitudinal bar dia = 12 mm [ IS-456:2000, clause 26.5.3.1]
Min. width of Columns = 300mm [ IS-13920:1993, clause 7.1.2]
Min aspect ratio of cross section = 0.4 [ IS-13920:1993, clause 7.1.3]

Pile Head
# Pile head is a transitory zone wherein reinforcement of Column as well as pile is getting overlapped. It is checked like a
column for axial force + biaxial bending for adequacy.
minimum reinforcement in Pile head will be as per clause 26.5.3.1.B

Beams
# As per IS:13920-1993, Sway Shear is added in designing of beams (if the frame is of Sway type). ULS & SLS design of
beams are carried out using RCDC & Inhouse Excel sheets
Min Long. Reinf. As per Cl. 26.5.1.1 of IS 456:2000
Max. Long Reinf. = 4% of Cross sectional area (Tension Steel only)
Min. Shear Reinf. As per 26.5.1.6 [ IS-456:2000, clause 26.5.1.1 & 26.5.1.2]
Min. Side face Reinforcement as per Cl. 26.5.1.3 & 26.5.1.7
Min. width of beams = 200mm [ IS-13920:1993, clause 6.1.3]
Min. width to Depth ratio = 0.3 [ IS-13920:1993, clause 6.1.2]

Slabs
# ULS & SLS design of slabs are carried out using In-house design Sheets as per Annexure D of IS 456 : 2000.
- Min Flexure Reinf. = 0.12% of Cross Sectional area [ IS-456:2000, clause 26.5.2.1]
- Max. Dia is less than 1/8th of total thickness of slab [ IS-456:2000, clause 26.5.2.2]
- Shear Check in wasit slab of staircase is done as per Clause 40 of IS 456:2000 since shear stirrups are not provided
in waist slab, it is ensured that concrete takes shear. (note : EQ cases are neglected in Design of waist slab)

Walls
# RCC walls of Lift are designed for minimum reinforcement (0.12% of cross sectional area) as they are considered to be
filler walls providing in-plane stiffness to structural column at corner.
ANNEXURE 1 - REFERENCE FOR LOADS DUE TO LIFT