Professional Documents
Culture Documents
QoS2 CISCO
QoS2 CISCO
elhallak
ip precedence use the first 3 bits , DSP use the first 6 bits (in fact the 6th bit is never used)
1 of 4 15-07-2014 13:39
What is the difference between cos , ip precedenc... http://elhallak.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/what-is...
6:Reserved (110)
7:Reserved(111)
Configuration Example:
Router(config-cmap)#exist
Router(config)#policy-map IP-PRECEDENCE-POLICY
Router(config-pmap)#class IP-PRECEDENCE
Router(config-pmap-c)#set ip precedence ?
Router(config-pmap-c)#exit
DSCP
The advantages of DSCP is that you may have more levels to define than “ip precedence”. For each level in “ip
precedence” , there are 3 sub levels.at the same time it is backward compatible
default Match packets with default dscp (000000) (no sub level for level 0 or best effort)
Notice in the above level for af11 = 001|010 , as the 6th bit is not used this will become in reality 001|01 which is
equal to 1|1 in decimal and the final result is af11
an old router which does not support DSCP will look at the first 3 bits , so the major classification will be Follow
2 of 4 15-07-2014 13:39
What is the difference between cos , ip precedenc... http://elhallak.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/what-is...
The second part or the second 3 bits is called Drop Preference ,the higher it is , the more chance it has to
be dropped . To resume af11 is better than af13 because af13 has more chance to be dropped than af11
ef Match packets with EF dscp (101110) (no sub levels for level 5 or critical level)
Configuring DSCP on a cisco router is the same as ip precedence the only difference will be in the following line
Router(config-pmap-c)#set ip dscp ef
1.
Rate this:
6 Votes
Share this:
Like
Be the first to like this.
Related
Follow
3 of 4 15-07-2014 13:39
What is the difference between cos , ip precedenc... http://elhallak.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/what-is...
Secure SRST Configuring Secure SCCP VG224 (VG2XX) What is the difference between POTS and
Over TLS with CUCM VOIP
This entry was posted in LAB, QoS and tagged cos, dscp, ip precedence. Bookmark the permalink.
David says:
25/09/2012 at 12:18 PM
hello, thanks for explanations, it’s very cool, but i’m experiencing a problem.
In fact, i can do all but i can’t apply this policy map to the output side of my interface. i want to class the traffic and limit the
rate before the flow leave my switch (Layer3). but i can’t, what’s the reason?
0 0 Rate This
Reply
David says:
25/09/2012 at 12:28 PM
well, i get it. it’s a misunderstanding of my part. with this, i’ll fix the dscp for example and it’s normal i have to do that in
input. i’ll limit the rate later on another interface.
0 0 Rate This
Reply
cisco.Netacad.com says:
19/10/2012 at 4:51 AM
0 0 Rate This
Reply
elhallak
The Twenty Ten Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.
Follow
4 of 4 15-07-2014 13:39