Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASHP Chapter 29 - Medication Dosing in Patients With Renal Dysfunction
ASHP Chapter 29 - Medication Dosing in Patients With Renal Dysfunction
Medication Dosing in
Patients with Renal
Dysfunction
Curt W. Quap, RPh, MS Pharm, FASHP
The kidneys are a major route of elimination for many
medications and waste products produced by the body.
Therefore, loss of renal function can affect the manage-
ment of medication therapy in patients. Impairment
of renal function can range in severity from mild
renal insufficiency to end-stage renal disease. Renal
failure can be acute (e.g., hypoperfusion of the kidney
resulting from severe hypovolemia or drug-induced
LEARNING OBJECTIVES acute tubular necrosis) or chronic in nature. There
are many causes of renal dysfunction, including acute
and chronic diseases, trauma or injury, dehydration,
• State the purpose and intent of a exposure to medications or other toxic substances, and
renal dosing program. advanced age. Because many medications are renally
eliminated, renal dysfunction increases the risk of
• Describe important concepts related
adverse drug effects. Pharmaceutical care of patients
to renal dosing.
with renal dysfunction is improved by individualizing
• Calculate appropriate dosing based medication dosing regimens based on the patient’s
on the patient’s degree of renal renal function.
impairment. Renal dosing of medications ensures efficacy
of medication therapy through the achievement of
appropriate drug serum concentrations and avoidance
of overdosing. Failure to adjust dosages in patients
with renal dysfunction can lead to accumulation of
these medications, resulting in toxicity. Examples
of adverse drug effects associated with renal insuf-
ficiency include neurotoxicity with acyclovir and H2
receptor antagonists and seizures with imipenem and
ceftazidime. Renal dosing improves patient safety by
making adjustments in medication dosage that ensure
serum drug concentrations do not reach toxic levels yet
remain at therapeutic levels to maintain efficacy. Renal
dosing programs also reduce costs through reduction
in dosage, avoidance of dose-related adverse effects,
and reduction in personnel time spent in preparing and
administering doses.
330 Competence Assessment Tools for Health-System Pharmacies
• Ethnicity (e.g., African Americans have higher mean Estimating Creatinine Clearance
SCr values and Mexican Americans have lower
mean values) Collecting urine output for 24 hours and directly
measuring creatinine excretion from that sample
Other changes in laboratory tests that may be seen is the most accurate measure of CrCl. However,
in patients with renal dysfunction include the following: approximating equations are more commonly used
• Altered serum electrolytes (e.g., hyperkalemia, because incomplete urine collection and laboratory
hyperphosphatemia, hypermagnesemia, hypo- considerations make 24-hour collections burdensome.
calcemia) A number of equations have been suggested for use,
• Increased blood urea nitrogen each with their own variability in results depending on
• Decreased serum albumin the patient being evaluated. The following discussion
will focus on those in common usage.
• Metabolic acidosis (decreased blood pCO2 and pH)
• Decreased hematocrit and hemoglobin
Patients 20 years of age or older
• Increased urine osmolality
CrCl can be estimated with the Cockcroft-Gault
• Imbalance in fluid input and output (I&O)
equation1:
• Hematuria and proteinuria Males
• Increased serum concentrations of medications or IBW (140 – Age)
their metabolites CrCl (mL/min) = 72 × SCr
Females
Candidate Patients for Renal IBW (140 – Age)
CrCl (mL/min) = × 0.85
Dosing 72 × SCr
It has been suggested that if ABW is greater than or very small patients the reported eGFR should be
TABLE
IBW 29-2.than
by more Oral200%
Bioavailability of Selected
(morbid obesity), Medications
then use multipliedAvailable in Bothbody
by the estimated IV and PO area (BSA)
surface
AdjBW, calculated
the Formulations a 3
as follows : to obtain eGFR in units of mL/min (eGFR/1.73m2 ×
estimated BSA = eGFR for drug dosing).6 In all cases,
AdjBW (kg) = IBW + [(0.2) (ABW – IBW)] whether practitioners continue to use Cockcroft-Gault
If the patient’s weight and height are not available, or adopt the use of eGFR, the patient’s clinical condi-
CrCl can be estimated with the Jellife equation4: tion should be taken into consideration whenever the
98 – [0.8 (Age in yrs – 20)]
calculated result falls close to the CrCl “breakpoints”
CrCl (mL/min) = SCr (mg⁄dL) for dosing adjustment.
In debilitated, cachectic, and/or elderly patients
Patients less than 20 years of age
with decreased muscle mass, if SCr is less than
0.8 mg/dL, it has been suggested that the actual SCr be CrCl can be estimated using the Schwartz equation7:
adjusted to 0.8 mg/dL. (Note that some practitioners (K value)(Height in cm)
CrCl (mL/min) =
will choose to round the SCr to 1.0 mg/dL to simplify SCr
• Presence of concurrent disease states 6. Estimation of Kidney Function for Prescription Medica-
tion Dosage in Adults. http://nkdep.nih.gov/resources/
• Presence of fluid overload or dehydration CKD-drug-dosing.shtml. Accessed February 28, 2014.
Pharmacokinetic calculations may also be useful in 7. Schwartz GJ, Brion LP, Spitzer A. The use of plasma
dosing some medications, such as aminoglycoside anti- creatinine concentration for estimating glomerular filtra-
biotics, vancomycin, and medications with a narrow tion rate in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatr
Clin North Am. 1987;34(3):571-590.
therapeutic window. Dosing modifications may involve
8. Pierrat A, Gravier E, Saunders C, et al. Predicting GFR
changes in dose, dosing frequency, or both.
in children and adults: a comparison of the Cockcroft-
After medication dosing adjustments are made, the Gault, Schwartz, and modification of diet in renal
patient should be monitored for medication response disease formulas. Kidney Int. 2003;64(4):1425-1436.
and toxicity. Drug serum concentrations should be
monitored, if applicable (e.g., aminoglycosides). Addi- Resources
tional dosage adjustments may be necessary based on • Dowling TC. Clinical assessment of kidney function. In:
the patient’s response to the medication or a change DiPiro J, Talbert RL, Yee G, et al., eds. Pharmacotherapy:
in the patient’s status, including renal function. A Pathophysiologic Approach. 8th ed. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill Medical; 2011:713-740.
References • Laroche ML, Charmes JP, Marcheix A, et al. Estimation of
glomerular filtration rate in the elderly: Cockcroft-Gault
1. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clear- formula versus modification of diet in renal disease
ance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31-41. formula. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26(7):1041-1046.
2. Devine BJ. Clinical pharmacy case studies. Case • Matzke GR. Drug therapy individualization for patients
number 25: gentamicin therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. with chronic kidney disease. In: DiPiro J, Talbert RL, Yee
1974;8:650-656. G, et al., eds. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic
3. Erstad BL. Which weight for weight-based dosage Approach. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical;
regimens in obese patients? Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2011:861-872.
2002;59(21):2105-2110. • Rule AD, Larson TS, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Using serum
4. Jellife RW. Creatinine clearance: bedside estimate. Ann creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy
Intern Med. 1973;79:604. in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern
5. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Expressing the Med. 2004;141(12):929-937.
MDRD study equation for estimating GFR with IDMS • Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Assessing kidney
traceable (gold standard) serum creatinine values. J Am function—measured and estimated glomerular filtration
Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:69A. Abstract. rate. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2473-2483.