Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FinalSubmission - Arianne Laus
FinalSubmission - Arianne Laus
FinalSubmission - Arianne Laus
Candidate details
Laus
Counsellor details
TAV Tepe Akfen Investment Quantity Surveyor 01 January 2015 31 March 2015
Construction & Operations
DMC Urban Property Developer Procurement Assistant 01 March 2006 31 May 2008
Inc.
Mandatory competencies
Client care 1 I understand that correctly identifying the Client’s objectives and 07 March 2019
requirements is essential to satisfy accordingly. I am also aware
12 that providing a high standard of service to the Client and
stakeholders ensures a good Client relationship and project
success.
I identified areas which we could add value and support the Client
further by creating a variation tracker to discuss with the Client
and team on a regular basis, also aiding me in tracking the status
12 of all variations.
Communication and 1 I am aware of the different types of communication including 07 March 2019
negotiation verbal, written and graphic. I ensure my communications are
complete, correct and concise. I continue to improve my
communication skills and implement when preparing emails,
reports, attending meetings and telephone calls on a daily basis.
12
I am aware of the stages such as understanding the issue that is
being negotiated, researching and preparing evidences, preparing
a plan of approach, negotiating fairly and compromising to an
agreement that will be beneficial to parties involved and aim for
the best interest of the Client.
12
Communication and 2 At Creekside 18 and Meraas Development, I regularly 07 March 2019
negotiation communicate with multiple stakeholders. My communication
varies from informal meetings to discuss on-site matters, team
wide emails to formally capture issues, and letters and reports
written to the Client.
12 I am involved in negotiations when reviewing and agreeing
claims. Upon completing my initial review, I arrange meetings with
the Contractor to review their claim in detail, discuss items not
agreed and aim to reach to an agreement. I prepare myself by
collating evidences that will support my assessment such as
12 measurement sheets, marked drawings, backup rates and
quotations.
Conflict avoidance, 1 I am aware having a proactive approach, keeping clear records, 07 March 2019
management and good management of documentation and being clear and concise
dispute resolution in the contract can assist to avoid conflict and disputes before
procedures they arise.
12
Many conflicts arise during the construction stage and dispute
resolution procedures are specified within the Contract. I
understand the processes involved and that early warnings and
timely notifications can both provide intention to resolve before a
dispute arising and enables contractual supporting documentation
12 for use in such disputes.
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Data Management 1 I understand the importance of data management and its usage 07 March 2019
including collection, organising and storage.
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Conduct rules, ethics 3 At Creekside 18, the Contractor stated that my payment 07 March 2019
and professional recommendation was under certified. I ensure my assessments
practice are transparent and demonstrated being fair and reasonable by
advising to the Client that non-certification was due to
unsubstantiated claims and which my assessment was in
accordance with the contract.
12
I advised the Client on potential conflict of interest when changing
companies however into the same project (Contractor to
Consultant). There was a possibility that by previously working for
the Contractor, my assessment of works or claims could be
construed as influencing my judgement and decision making.
12
When asked by the Client to advice on the matter of a VAT
Payment Application, being aware of my limitations and
company’s PI, I informed the Client that such advice should be
provided by specialist Tax consultants.
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Summary of Experience - Technical Competencies
Core competencies
12 I have worked on FIDIC Red Book 1987 for traditional lump sum
contracts and also when used as a basis for the Client to amend
for bespoke contracts at Oceanscape Abu Dhabi.
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Contract practice 3 I have implemented the different provisions of contract for a re- 07 March 2019
measurable contract (Enabling Works) and lump sum contract
(Main Works) at Creekside 18. Primary differences of these
contracts were the payment and variation provisions.
12 During the tender period for tender queries raised, I ensured that
all tenderers were notified and were given the same information /
clarification to abide by a fair tender selection process.
Procurement and 3 I commercially evaluated the tender bids related to the Provisional 07 March 2019
tendering Sum works for Creekside 18. I prepared and issued tender
12 reports including review of tender submissions, post tender
clarifications, tender analysis, conclusions and a final
recommendation to the Client.
For the Façade Works, a Tenderer provided his own terms for the
advance payment with a percentage which was not in accordance
with the terms stipulated in the Tender Documents wherein stated
as 10%. I notified the Tenderer that payment terms should be as
12 per the provisions stated in Conditions of the Sub-contract and
advised to confirm his acceptance and to remove this qualification
to his offer. I advised the Client that the proposed 20% advance
payment could be accepted provided and suggested that a further
saving could be requested to the Tenderer against the increase in
advance payment percentage. The Client agreed and I requested
12 the Tenderer to provide their cost saving proposal.
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Project financial control 1 I am aware of the importance of cost control throughout a project 07 March 2019
and reporting wherein the Client should be made aware of all changes, known
and anticipated, and their financial effects on the project.
12 I update the cash flow forecast with the actual payments against
projected. This allows me to monitor if the Contractor is ahead or
delayed against the programme.
12
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Project financial control 3 I manage and advise the Client regularly on the change control at 07 March 2019
and reporting Creekside 18 including Client changes such as landscape works
to swimming pool areas. I provided estimated costs for each
option prior to the Contractor submitting a claim. The Client have
clear process to follow to which I advise various stakeholders the
status of each change at each stage, including requesting for
12 price adjustments, variation order and recommendation and
determination of price adjustments.
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Quantification and 2 I have undertaken and issued various measurement at different 07 March 2019
costing of construction stages of a project, including post contract variations and pre-
works contract cost planning and estimating at various design stages.
I have produced cost plans for Dubai Water Canal SB04 & SB05.
At concept design stage as there was limited information, I
12 calculated the GFA and used m2 benchmarked rates for specific
elements of the works including internal finishes.
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Design economics and 1 I have produced various cost plans and estimates across different 07 March 2019
cost planning design stages including concept and detailed design. I
understand the requirement for benchmarking feasibility
estimates using cost per m2 or functional unit rates, which can
then be utilised to produce further cost plans to reflect design
development of each stage, resulting in an improved level of
12 detail and accuracy of the cost plan.
12 I utilise our in-house cost database and current market rates from
suppliers for cost information. I am aware of the limitations of
such data and that the rates may be adjusted due to project
specification, location and inflation.
12
I attend training sessions in the work place in order to continue
my estimating and measurement skills. I commonly use CostX for
cost planning and production of Bills of Quantities.
Design economics and 2 At Turner & Townsend I have undertaken various cost plans and 07 March 2019
cost planning
12 cost estimates including measuring against concept, schematic
and detailed design stages for the production of cost plans and
bills of quantities.
At the New Operations Centre project, the cost plan was based
on a preliminary design. I undertook checking of drawings,
12 specifications and reports to know the relevant design factors to
be considered in the cost plan and included necessary
assumptions for items unknown including the concrete grade and
reinforcement ratio (kg/m3).
Construction technology 1 Most of the projects that I have been involved in are primarily 07 March 2019
and environmental residential / commercial type of buildings. Working on
services construction sites and completing regular site visits has
developed my knowledge and understanding of construction and
12 engineering activities which aided me in quantifying and costing a
design, and assessment of valuations and variations.
12
Optional competencies
12
12
12
12
12
12
Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Record
Learning The discussion includes question and answer session with other
outcomes: APC candidates and senior management which enhanced my
awareness of the APC competencies and its requirements.
Competencies covered in this session was Conduct Rules, Ethics
and Professional Practise.
28 February 2019 Activity type: Work-based Activity 1.00 hour
Description: Design Cost Advice, Cost Planning & Cost Engineering Formal
Learning I learned that cost plan is produced in different design stages such
outcomes: as concept and detailed design. As the design develops the level of
detail and accuracy of cost plan improves. Factors to be considered
in preparing a cost plan includes knowing the Client requirements
that needs to be included (e.g. Fees), site visit, assumptions,
exclusions, etc.
25 February 2019 Activity type: Private Study 12.00 hours
Learning I learned that programme (revised and updated) and good record
outcomes: keeping are important in preparing a claim.
Date CPD Hours
19 February 2019 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 2.00 hours
Learning I learned about the different types of tendering and understood the
outcomes: tendering procedures. This CPD also introduced e-procurement
which is the efficient reform that has now been implemented in
UAE.
15 February 2019 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 3.00 hours
Learning I learned about the RICS ethical standards and how to apply and
outcomes: ensure to practise them at all times
11 February 2019 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 2.00 hours
Learning The discussion includes question and answer session with other
outcomes: APC candidates and senior management which enhanced my
awareness of the APC competencies and its requirements.
12 December 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 1.50 hours
Learning I learned that estimating methods can be single rate (e.g. functional
outcomes: unit rate, GFA rate) or multiple rate with accurate quantities (e.g.
BOQs). Also, I understand that cost estimate is a prediction of the
costs of construction and cost plan is used to control estimated
costs and must be managed throughout the project cycle.
04 September 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 1.50 hours
Learning The discussion includes question and answer session with other
outcomes: APC candidates and senior management which enhanced my
awareness of the APC competencies and its requirements.
Competencies covered in this session were Conflict Avoidance and
Dispute Resolution Procedures and Contract Administration.
18 July 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 2.00 hours
Learning The discussion includes question and answer session with other
outcomes: APC candidates and senior management which enhanced my
awareness of the APC competencies and its requirements.
Competencies covered in this session was Project Financial Control
and Reporting.
28 May 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 1.00 hour
Learning The discussion includes question and answer session with other
outcomes: APC candidates and senior management which enhanced my
awareness of the APC competencies and its requirements.
Competencies covered in this session was Procurement and
Tendering.
20 March 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 1.50 hours
Learning I learned about the RICS ethical standards and how to apply and
outcomes: ensure to practise them at all times.
02 March 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 3.00 hours
Learning I learned about the RICS ethical standards and how to apply and
outcomes: ensure to practise them at all times.
28 February 2018 Activity type: Work-based Activity 2.00 hours
Description: Turner & Townsend Cost Management Quarterly Meetings (Dubai) - Informal
November 2017 and February 2018
Learning Understanding our team’s position within the business, progress on
outcomes: current projects and update on bids and new wins.
Date CPD Hours
28 February 2018 Activity type: Work-based Activity 3.50 hours
Learning The discussion includes question and answer session with other
outcomes: APC candidates and senior management which enhanced my
awareness of the APC competencies and its requirements.
Competencies covered in this session were Contract Practice,
Business Planning and Health and Safety.
21 February 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 2.00 hours
Learning The discussion with question and answer session with other APC
outcomes: candidates and senior management enhanced my awareness of the
APC competencies and its requirements. Competencies covered in
this session were Conduct rules, Ethics and Professional Practise,
Client Care and Communication and Negotiation.
26 January 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 4.00 hours
Learning VAT in UAE was recently been implemented (January 2018) and
outcomes: this training provided an overview of the importance of VAT and its
implications to commercial activities including construction industry.
05 December 2017 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 2.00 hours
Learning I learned and understood various possible event that may give rise
outcomes: to a claim within FIDIC 1999 for both the Contractor and the
Employer and the importance of keeping contemporary record as
part of supporting documentation for any claim.
14 October 2017 Activity type: Training Course 3.00 hours
Learning I learned about different types of approach on how parties will reach
outcomes: an agreement which may also be influenced by the behavioural
aspects of the parties involved.
03 October 2017 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 3.00 hours
Description: Guidelines on Case Study Submission and Report Writing Skills Formal
Learning This training session provided all users the information regarding
outcomes: the recent software updates and changes from the earlier version of
CostX being used.
28 April 2017 Activity type: Training Course 3.00 hours
Description: Turner & Townsend Cost Management Quarterly Meetings (Dubai) - Informal
Quarterly
Learning Understanding our team’s position within the business, progress on
outcomes: current projects and update on bids and new wins.
Case study
Total word count for your case study ARC was unable to count the words in your case study.
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
Case study
Submit one case study with a maximum of 3000 words. The focus of the case study must be
on a single project or piece(s) of work undertaken in the last 24 months. The project you
choose MUST allow you to demonstrate technical competencies from your chosen pathway,
and how you used the competency skills. It must be written as a professional report
including all the components below. The confidentiality statement must be completed
to confirm consent has been approved. If you cannot get consent you should
disguise all facts that might otherwise make the project identifiable.
Confidentiality statement
The following case study contains confidential information included for the purpose of the
“the Client” and Turner & Townsend International Ltd, hereinafter termed “the Cost
Consultant” have given their consent to disclose details for the case study on the basis that
the information is not to be used for any other purpose or by any person other than those
authorised by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (e.g. staff and assessors).
1
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
Contents Page
1. Introduction 3
2. My Approach 7
3. My Achievements 12
4. Conclusion 14
Total word count: 2,967 words (Excluding contents, sub-headings and appendices)
2
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
1. Introduction
1.1 Project Description & Brief
Creekside 18 is part of Dubai Creek Harbour Development and is comprised of two basement
levels, ground floor level and three podium levels below two 37 storey residential towers.
There are 500 total residential units comprised of multiple layouts including townhouses,
apartments and penthouses.
Provisional Sum packages includes MEP works, Façade works, vertical transportation, timber
and metals doors, joinery, light fixtures and sanitary ware items. The extent of the packages
were defined by the Client.
The Client’s concern of affordability was raised from the outset of the project, which the
Provisional Sum packages were closely interrogated internally from the Client’s commercial
team. Meeting the Provisional Sum budgets and having cost certainty were key aspects of the
Client’s appetite to risk.
3
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
Cost reporting for monthly period review, accruals forecast and quarterly targets;
4
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
5
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
6
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
2. My Approach
2.1 Background
A tender schedule for the Provisional Sum packages was produced by the Client and was
introduced to all parties during the kick-off meeting which was held in January 2017. This
schedule identified the key dates of activities for the tender process of each package.
The early phase of the tendering process for the timber and metal doors Provisional Sum
package (Doors Package) were:
First week of April 2017 – Package scope, bid list and Client specific requirements is
to be issued by the Client to the Contractor;
Fourth week of April 2017 – Contractor to compile Scope of Works and extracted Bill
of Quantities from the Main Contract. The Engineer to provide design information and
Cost Consultant to collate the Tender package for Client review;
Third week of May 2017 – The Client, through the Cost Consultant, to issue Instruction
to Tenderers (ITT) to the approved tender list;
The Tender period would commence and the tender returns were expected in the second
week of July 2017.
Phase 1 2 3 4
Submit SOW, Tender
Issue Draft
ITT Package Preparation Issue
SI Package Update Scope and
and Approval Stage ITT
Bid List
of Bid List (Weeks)
Timber &
Metal
1 Planned 09-Apr-17 23-Apr-17 4.0 21-May-17
Doors
Package
Refer to Appendix B – Timber and Metal Doors Tender Schedule for details
2.1 Key Issue – Completion and Alignment of Doors Package Tender Documents
The key issue was that the design discrepancies found between the Tender and Issued for
Construction (IFC) documents prevented the Client from issuing aligned and accurate
information whilst already in delay against the planned dates identified in the tender schedule.
7
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
The Architect issued the IFC drawings at the same time when the issuance of ITT was
scheduled. I reviewed and prepared a comparison between the Tender Design and IFC design
information and identified a number of design changes and discrepancies that required
feedback from the Architect and Engineer. These clarifications were required for me to update
the Bill of Quantities and align it to the updated IFC design.
The Engineer was assigned to manage the process of resolving queries raised. However, as
they were the ‘middle party’ by forwarding my queries to the Architect for clarification of design
discrepancies, the process of acquiring information and responses took longer than expected
to complete. This contributed to early delays against the tender schedule.
The Bill of Quantities did not match the updated IFC design as this was prepared based on
the Tender Design information. The Bill of Quantities was previously prepared due to the
Client’s earlier intention to include the Doors Package within the Main Contractor’s scope.
However, this resulted in tender returns with higher costs than anticipated, therefore the Client
decided to extract the Doors Package from the Main Works and include the same under a
Provisional Sum package.
I addressed this issue to the Client and established a number of options to explore
opportunities that could mitigate the current delay whilst at the same time providing the
Tenderers with clear and accurate tender information.
Having identified the key issue, I considered the following options to determine the most
appropriate option to advise the Client:
Option 1 - Issue the Doors Tender Package based on the current Tender Design
documents and issue the IFC information as a Tender Addendum or post award
variation;
Option 2 - Issue a Schedule of Rates based on the IFC updated Door Schedule in lieu
of Bill of Quantities;
Option 3 - To align the Bill of Quantities with the IFC design prior to the issuance of
the Doors Tender Package
2.3.1 Option 1 - Issue Doors Tender Package based on Tender Design and issue IFC
information as Tender Addendum or post award variation
8
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
The intention of this option was for the Client to issue the tender documents based on the
current Tender Design information, allowing firstly the Architect and Engineer to finalise the
IFC information including the Door Schedule and subsequently enabling me to accurately
review and update the Bill of Quantities against the IFC design changes. Once all documents
were confirmed, aligned and cleared of discrepancies, the updated IFC information would then
be issued to the Tenderers as a Tender Addendum or as a post tender award variation,
whichever will be applicable at the time of completion.
The advantage of implementing this option was that it would mitigate the delays already
incurred against the tender schedule and tender award since the Tender Documents would
be issued as per the planned date based on the tender schedule.
However, there was an immediate disadvantage that the issuance of non-aligned tender
information would create confusion to the Tenderers and would likely take a longer period of
time in closing out during the Post Tender Clarification stages and ensuring tender returns
were on a like for like basis for the purpose of evaluation.
A further disadvantage was that once the IFC-based Bill of Quantities and design including
the door schedule was issued as a Tender Addendum, the Tenderers would be required to
undertake re-checking, re-quantifying, re-pricing and re-submission of their offers which would
require additional time for the Tenderers to complete. If the Client opted for the IFC information
to be issued as post contract award variation, there would be no cost certainty until IFC
changes have been implemented.
Although the issuance of the tender would be in line with the tender schedule, there was a
clear risk for the Post Tender Clarification stage to continue for a longer period of time due to
the inconsistencies in the design information received by the Tenderers which could have
resulted in potential delay in nomination. Furthermore, I was aware of the Client’s brief that
cost certainty was a key concern, which selecting this option would not meet the Client’s
objectives and known costs would not be known until a later stage if issued as a variation. On
this basis, this option was rejected.
2.3.2 Option 2 - Issue a Schedule of Rates based on the IFC Door Schedule in lieu of
Bill of Quantities for pricing
This option was for the Client to issue a Schedule of Rates in lieu of the Bill of Quantities and
for the Tenderers to provide prices for each door identified in the Door Schedule only.
The benefits of using a Schedule of Rates include a potential reduction in tender period due
to quicker pricing method and that all doors in the Door Schedule are guaranteed to be priced.
9
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
One of the disadvantages in utilising this option would be the difficulty to align the items during
payment valuations during the post contract stage as the priced Schedule of Rates based on
the door schedule would not match the Contract BOQ. There would likely be possibilities to
resolve this problem however, efficiency in the assessment of interim valuations was important
for timely payment to the Contractor.
During my review of the tender documents, it was found that there were discrepancies
between the Tender Design Door Schedule and drawings plus additional disparities were
found when the IFC design was issued. Since this was a design related issue, co-ordination
and involvement of the Architect and Engineer were required to close out all discrepancies.
This was considered as another disadvantage of utilising this option, as the multiple
discrepancies across both Tender and IFC design would need to be fully resolved for the
Tenderers to submit the Schedule of Rates against a final door schedule. This review could
have resulted into multiple Door Schedule revisions and further delays in the tender pricing
period.
This option was discounted to continue due to combined risk of delay, unaligned pricing
documents for later stage in the project and the many design discrepancies required to finalise
in the door schedule for accurate pricing.
2.3.3 Option 3 - Align BOQ with the corrected IFC design prior to the issuance of the
Doors Tender Package
This option was to propose to the Client a clear and concise strategy, to firstly close out all
outstanding design discrepancies (between Tender Design and IFC information) and capture
all the design corrections in a revised Bill of Quantities prior to issuing the Doors Tender
Package.
The advantage for this option was primarily that all design documents including the Door
Schedule would be corrected and aligned, with all gaps in the tender documents rectified,
likely resulting in fewer ambiguities, fewer tender queries and aligned pricing for analysis,
which in turn would save significant time during the Post Tender Clarification and tender
review stages.
Considering cost certainty for the Client, understanding this was an important factor when
reviewing the Client’s objectives and a high priority, this approach allowed for better cost
certainty at the tender award stage with lower likelihood for post contract variations as all
design discrepancies would be removed.
A disadvantage was that the Client would be required to accept the highly likely delay in
issuance of the Tender Documents. Reviewing, re-measuring and aligning the Bill of
10
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
Quantities against the updated IFC documents would require more time during this tender
preparation stage. In addition, this could be compounded by further potential delays of not
achieving the other key dates identified in the tender schedule, likely resulting in a late tender
award.
I clearly identified to the Client the risk of delay in nomination of the Doors Provisional Sum
package as a result of this option, however advised that this was the most commercially
beneficial option and which would likely reduce variations at later stages.
Based on the acknowledgement of better cost certainty at tender award and having correct
and aligned documents for pricing, the Client agreed to implement this option.
11
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
3. My Achievements
After undertaking a comprehensive review of the revised documents, I was able to provide the
Client with aligned Tender Documents which increased the possibility of the Doors Package
to be more efficient during the tender stages and more accurate for pricing.
My first action was to gather the available information and start identifying design gaps. I
collated and consolidated the design information including the Door Schedule, IFC
Architectural Drawings, IFC Interior Design drawings and Bill of Quantities. I thoroughly
checked and compared each document to ensure that all doors were covered under my re-
quantification and alignment exercise. After a careful review, I prepared a list of all design
discrepancies found and identified all missing information required from the Architect and
Engineer to complete my comparison exercise. Being aware of the delays incurred for
receiving responses to earlier discrepancy queries, I provided deadlines of dates for each
action to be closed. I communicated regularly with the Architect and Engineer to ensure that
the team was progressing as planned. I arranged workshops with the Architect and Engineer
to collectively review and closely monitor updates on design clarifications and status of actions
such as re-submission of final IFC drawings. I also provided the Client with the status update
on a regular basis of the project team’s progress and target dates for the tender package to
be ready for issue.
After every workshop, the design gaps were continuously resolved with confirmed and
updated design information.
As soon as I received the confirmed information from the Architect and Engineer, I
commenced with updating the Bill of Quantities and commenced aligning it to the updated
design. The effect of the resolved design discrepancies resulted to a major adjustment of the
items in the Bill of Quantities, reflecting corrected door types, dimensions, specifications and
associated quantities. I also ensured that both the Bill of Quantities and Door Schedule
contained the exact same information, which would assist the Tenderer with the identification
of doors and with the intent to reduce ambiguity.
Following completion of the alignment exercise, I informed the Client of these changes and
advised that the Doors Package was ready for issue to Tenderers. The completed exercises
guaranteed that all tender documents were corrected and aligned prior to issue for pricing,
however as indicated, this affected the programme as the ITT was issued on a later date
compared to the planned date in the tender schedule.
Upon reviewing the revised ITT date, I advised the Client that with the design discrepancies
and pricing documents aligned, there was a lower risk of a large number of tender queries,
12
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
thus enabling a potential reduction in the tender period. I advised that the original provision for
Tenderers pricing period of eight weeks could be reduced to six weeks accordingly.
Further assessment of the tender schedule enabled a reduction of two weeks for the Post
Tender Clarification and negotiation period (Refer to Appendix B for details of planned vs
actual dates).
The tender returns were received and Post Tender Clarification stage commenced. Post
tender queries were mostly on the commercial terms, conditions and qualifications. There
were no further clarifications within the tender documents regarding the door quantities and
the Tenderers did not consider any additional items. With that, Post Tender Clarification stage
was completed as planned and proceeded with the negotiation and tender award stage.
Based on the above, it was concluded that the correction and alignment exercise was
successful and it provided the Tenderers with accurate information for pricing the Doors
Package which met the Client’s objective in terms of cost certainty and quality of complete
information.
13
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
4. Conclusion
This issue highlighted to me the importance of the information required for the tendering phase
as at this stage the Client’s decision to obtain the price and programme of the project and the
selection of the Contractor is achieved. It is essential that the quality and accuracy of the
tender documentation is complete, clear and consistent as the Tenderers rely upon these
factors when reviewing and preparing their offer. Inconsistency and discrepancies in Tender
Documents may lead ambiguity in understanding the design, inaccurate estimates, high risk
allowances in pricing, delay in the tendering process and potential cost implications in the
form of variations during the construction phase.
I have learned that in decision making, it is important not only to consider the immediate effect
of my choices but I have to be mindful of the effect on the whole of the process. If I had chosen
to utilise Options 1 and 2, the tender package would have been issued to the Tenderers as
per the dates identified in the tender schedule, however this action could have resulted in
further delays in the later stages and tendering and a higher likelihood of uncertainty of cost
impact to the Provisional Sum until a later date on post award.
By considering the whole tendering process, evidently I advised the Client that Option 3 should
be implemented as the result of the comprehensive review at the tender preparation stage
was the most commercially beneficial option for the Client.
This comprehensive review and alignment exercise could have not been completed without
the involvement of other parties including the Architect and Engineer. I believe that the project
team worked well together in performing this task and having taken the responsibility of
completing this exercise, I learned how to manage a team and acknowledged the importance
of communication and constant co-ordination between the parties involved. Regular meetings
are essential to ensure that all relevant parties are updated and aware of the current
information and the importance of the timescales and actions required.
Throughout this whole process, I developed my skills in problem solving, identifying risks, and
managing the work with multiple stakeholders effectively to overcome the challenges which
led to a successful outcome and met the Client satisfaction.
If I were to advise again on this issue or when faced with similar tendering issues at early
stages, I would recommend the designer to ensure design discrepancies are reviewed and
removed as early as possible and when identified. There was a possibility of lack of quality
assurance and quality control when the design information was issued as these discrepancies
in design should have been identified prior to issuance. I understand that co-ordination
between designers (architectural, structural, MEP, Interior etc.) are critical to achieve minimal
design errors.
14
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
This issue was different with regards to the timing of the IFC design issue and that this was
for a Provisional Sum package. If the IFC design was provided at an earlier stage then I would
have been able to commence with updating the tender documents immediately subject to the
date for ITT. Prior to this, I would also ensure the Client is clear of their requirement to either
go out to tender based on Tender Design or IFC design information. Early knowledge of this
would allow me to advise on the potential time implications to review and update the Bill of
Quantities accordingly.
Total word count for your case study – 2,967 words (Excluding contents, sub-
headings and appendices)
15
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
Please insert the mandatory, core technical and optional technical competencies
demonstrated in your case study. Please follow the format below and add more rows if
required, simply use copy and paste.
Mandatory Core Optional
Team working
16
Arianne Laus Candidate No. 6768294
17