Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

                               SCS NO.1334/2019
Order­Exh. 80

ORDER BELOW EXH.80 IN SCS NO.1334/2019
[ Savita Bharadwaj  vs. Dr. Rujuta Bharadwaj & Ors. ]  

CNR NO.:­ MHPU02­005801­2019

1. The defendants have filed present application for reopening of
the evidence. The application is opposed by the plaintiff by reply Exh.81.

2. Heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of both sides.
The   matter   was   closed   for   final   hearing.   After   commencement   of   final
hearing   by   the   defendants,   the   defendants   have   moved   the   present
application. The defendants want to examine husband of the plaintiff. The
defendants   have   submitted   that   inadvertently   they   have   closed   the
evidence,   but   the   husband   of   the   plaintiff   is   left   to   be   examined.   The
plaintiff   has   opposed   the   application   on   the   ground   that   already   the
defendants   Advocate   has  completed   the   final  argument   of   the   suit.   The
defendants have not filed list of witnesses. So, the defendants cannot be
permitted to examine the witness.   But the witness which the defendants
are intending to examine is attesting witness to Indemnity bond Exh.78.
The said document is very important document for determination of the
controversy  involved  in  the  suit.  So,  it  is just and  proper  to  permit  the
defendants to examine the witness as prayed. The plaintiff would not cause
any prejudice, if the defendants are permitted to examine the said witness.
Hence,   the   defendants   are   permitted   to   examine   the   husband   of   the
plaintiff. Accordingly, the application is allowed.     
Digitally signed by
KAMAL MOHANLAL
JAISINGANI
Date: 2023.03.27
17:19:13 +0530

Date : 27/03/2023                        (K.M. Jaisingani) 


                          th 
9 Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, 
           Pune     
2                                SCS NO.1334/2019
Order­Exh. 80

         
          
                 
///////
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F file judgment/Order are same, word to
word, as per the original judgment/Order.                                                                 
 
Name of the Stenographer  Mrs. J.S. Tembre,
Name of the Court  Mr. K.M. Jaisingani, 9th Jt. C.J.S.D., Pune.  
Date of  Judgment  27/03/2023
Judgment signed by the P.O on   27/03/2023
Judgment uploaded on   27/03/2023

 
 
3                                SCS NO.1334/2019
Order­Exh. 80

      

You might also like