Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Arpeco Final Exam Reviewer
Arpeco Final Exam Reviewer
Arpeco Final Exam Reviewer
1
ARpeco – FINAL EXAM REVIEWER
LESSON 2: PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT conservation or biosecurity and implementation
of these plans are key.
3
ARpeco – FINAL EXAM REVIEWER
➢ DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-30 ➢ ARTICLE 2:
o IMPLEMENTING RULES AND REGULATIONS (IRR) o CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT OR
FOR THE PHILIPPINE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT UNDERTAKING
STATEMENT (EIS) SYSTEM ▪ Size of the project
▪ Consistent with the continuing effort of the ▪ Cumulative nature of impacts vis-à-vis other
Department of Environment and Natural projects
Resources (DENR) to rationalize and streamline ▪ Use of natural resources
the implementation of the Philippine ▪ Generation of waste and environment-related
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System nuisance
established under Presidential Decree (PD) No. ▪ Environment-related hazards and risk of
1586, Presidential Proclamation No. 2146 accidents
defining the scope of the EIS System and o LOCATION OF THE PROJECT
pursuant to Administrative Order No. 42 issued ▪ Vulnerability of the project area to disturbances
by the Office of the President on November 2, due to its ecological importance, endangered or
2002, the following rules and regulations are protected status.
hereby promulgated. ▪ Conformity of the proposed project to existing
land use, based on approved zoning or on
national laws and regulations.
➢ ARTICLE 1: ▪ Relative abundance, quality, and regenerative
o BASIC POLICY, OPERATING PRINCIPLES, capacity of natural resources in the area,
OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITION OF TERMS including the impact absorptive capacity of the
environment.
o NATURE OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACT
➢ ARTICLE 2: ▪ Geographic extent of the impact and size of
o ECC APPLICATION PROCESSING AND APPROVAL affected population
PROCEDURES ▪ Magnitude and complexity of the impact
▪ The specific criteria for determining projects or ▪ Likelihood, duration, frequency, and reversibility
undertakings to be covered by the EIS System of the impact
are as follows:
• Characteristics of the project or
undertaking ➢ ARTICLE 2:
• Location of the Project o The following are the categories of
• Nature of the potential impact projects/undertakings under the EIS system:
▪ CATEGORY A.
• Environmentally Critical Projects (ECPs)
with significant potential to cause
negative environmental impacts 8.
4
ARpeco – FINAL EXAM REVIEWER
▪ CATEGORY B. g.) Environmental Management Program / Plan
• Projects that are not categorized as h.) Supporting documents, including
ECPs, but which may cause negative technical/socio-economic data
environmental impacts because they are used/generated; certificate of zoning viability
located in Environmentally Critical Areas and municipal land use plan; and proof of
(ECA’s) consultation with stakeholders.
▪ CATEGORY C. i.) Proposals for Environmental Monitoring and
• Projects intended to directly enhance Guarantee Funds including justification of
environmental quality or address existing amount, when required.
environmental problems not falling under j.) Accountability statement of EIA consultants
Category A or B. and the project proponent
▪ CATEGORY D. k.) Other clearances and documents that may
• Projects unlikely to cause adverse be determined and agreed upon during
environmental impacts. scoping.
➢ ARTICLE 3:
➢ ARTICLE 2: o STRENGTHENING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
o Section 5.2 Forms and Contents of EIA Study Reports PHILIPPINE EIS SYSTEM
and Other Documents Required Under the EIS System ➢ ARTICLE 4:
▪ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) o MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
▪ The EIS should contain at least the following:
a.) EIS Executive Summary
b.) Project Description ➢ STAGES OF THE EIA PROCESS
c.) Matrix of the scoping agreement identifying
critical issues and concerns, as validated by
EMB.
d.) Baseline environmental conditions focusing
on the sectors (and resources) most
significantly affected by the proposed action.
e.) Impact assessment focused on significant
environmental impacts (in relation to project
construction/commissioning, operation, and
decommissioning), taking into account
cumulative impacts.
f.) Environmental Risk Assessment if
determined by EMB as necessary during
scoping.
5
ARpeco – FINAL EXAM REVIEWER