Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Haiti Problem Tree Activity and Reflection
Haiti Problem Tree Activity and Reflection
Professor Bailey
UH 205
10 January 23
One of the quintessential questions when discussing the 2010 Haitian earthquake is
whether it was a natural or man-made disaster. Haiti sits on a fault line between the North
American and Caribbean tectonic plates. Movement between these plates at the fault line is the
physical cause for every earthquake in Haiti’s history. However, in 2010, hurricanes were
considered the bigger threat and hurricane reinforcement was made a priority. In response, there
concrete and cinderblocks held up well during hurricanes but were extremely vulnerable during
earthquakes. Not only was the infrastructure prepared to handle only one kind of natural disaster,
but it was also poorly built. Housing within the cities were often in violation of existing building
codes due to contractors erecting it quickly enough to keep up with the migration of citizens.
Additionally, Haiti suffers more erosion after major storms and earthquakes due to deforestation
by French colonizers during the 17th century. The lack of trees that root soil firmly into place
causes earthquakes to have far more devastating consequences (example: sink holes, landslides).
Haiti was also dealing with political unrest in 2010; the Haitian people were struggling through
rigged elections and constantly seeing their Presidents murdered. The lack of a strong,
centralized government left Haiti vulnerable and unable to defend itself (politically).
It is obvious that the answer to the question “Was the 2010 Haitian earthquake a natural
fault line. The earthquakes that have demolished Haiti have all originated from this fault line.
The fault line is the natural cause of the earthquake as humans have no control over how and
when tectonic plates move. The damages brought out by the earthquake were all man-made: the
Alexis Emmens
Professor Bailey
UH 205
10 January 23
destruction of housing stems from the improper construction and lack of oversight, sink holes
and landslides were caused by soil erosion due to deforestation during French colonialization,
and the inability to self-advocate was brought on by a weak and unstable government.
In his book, The Big Truck That Went By: How the World Came to Save Haiti and Left
Behind a Disaster, Katz explores the reasons of the widespread destruction of the 2010 Haitian
earthquake. Katz notes how Port-au-Prince was built between mountains and the sea as a
strategic deterrent to piracy in the 18th century. That location also makes the city vulnerable to
natural disasters. It is also mentioned that Haiti’s rich abundance of coffee and sugarcane made it
a target for competing colonial powers, but the centuries of foreign intrusion and occupation
destroyed it’s agricultural industry and made it dependent on foreign imports. Katz also dives
into the consistent meddling in Haiti's elections, which later contributed to a weak central
government. Katz then deemed that all these factors primed the country for disaster. However, he
also stresses how the influx of foreign aid caused even more chaos. There was no centralized
coordination between the relief organizations and the non-governmental agencies. The medical
teams typically worked in isolation with no communication or control. Agencies often opted for
short-term solutions over long-term ones. In addition to the lack of top-down control, a cholera
epidemic breaks out at a United Nations military compound. The epidemic was caused by the
disposal of septic waste that violated environmental protocols. The septic waste entered the
Artibonite River, which is the source of drinking water for many Haitians, and caused over
80,000 deaths. In the end, Katz concluded that foreign governments should have trusted Haiti to
Professor Bailey
UH 205
10 January 23
In Haiti Earthquake Response written by Katherine Haver, she states that locals
immediately responded to the earthquake by pulling neighbors out of buildings, clearing bodies
and debris, and starting to rebuild their lives. Haitians abroad sent home estimated hundreds of
millions in aid to help rebuild their communities. It was very clear that the Haitians were ready
and able to support themselves. However, the crisis gained massive media attention and drew in
organizations from South American, the Caribbean, Europe, and America mounted a massive
humanitarian response by donating three billion dollars’ worth of assistance. In The Big Truck
That Went By: How the World Came to Save Haiti and Left Behind a Disaster, we can see that
this humanitarian response wasn’t exactly humane. These organizations were operating
unchecked, lacked communication, and had no coordination. In addition, much of the aid that
was promised was never delivered because it was dependent on political demands that the
Haitian government could not meet. Many Haitian citizens were left living in tents in settlement
camps that were intended to be temporary, and communities were plagued with cholera. The
carelessness of these organizations caused many of the issues that followed the 2010 earthquake.
The effects of the earthquake, while catastrophic to the local population, were also
devastating to the local government. Haver had stated that seventeen percent of Haiti’s central
government employees were killed in the collapse of government buildings. With an already
weak central government, this caused even more political unrest. With a presidential election
about to be held, a multitude of candidates desperately started campaigning. This created what
Professor Bailey
UH 205
10 January 23
oversee the election. Haitian citizens were extremely angry with the foreign involvement, and
they protested. As a result, Michel Martelly, a Kompa artist and entertainer, won the election and
became president. Martelly had no prior political experience and only entered politics when he
became eligible for presidency. As a result, the nation continued to struggle behind an unfit
leader.
Had there been more coordination and communication between the foreign government,
international organizations, the Haitian government, and the Haitian people themselves, the
effects of the earthquake could have been greatly minimized. Housing could have been rebuilt up
to code, citizens may have not been left homeless in settlement camps, cholera may not have
decimated the population, and the Haitian government could have been left stable and strong.
However, foreign governments were unable to trust the nation to fix themselves and their
government. As a result, Haiti was left decimated and has yet to fully recover.