Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BTN 1999-002deck JointsV1.2-Dec05
BTN 1999-002deck JointsV1.2-Dec05
1. SCOPE
This document sets out VicRoads’ requirements for design and specification of deck joints for road bridges.
This document is supplementary to, and should be read in conjunction with the AS 5100 ‘Bridge Design’ -
2004 and Sections 660 of VicRoads’ Standard Specifications for Roadworks and Bridgeworks.
2. GENERAL
Deck joint systems are assessed for use by VicRoads based on the following criteria:-
• Compliance with AS 5100 requirements for loads, movements and material standards,
• Documented evidence of satisfactory performance for the particular in service conditions, and
• Experienced engineering judgement.
VicRoads Design’s practice is to provide on the bridge drawings a list of acceptable deck joint systems from
which the contractor may choose a supplier. If the contractor wishes to use an alternative joint system, the
contractor must submit design details in accordance with AS 5100 for the alternative. VicRoads makes the
final decision on the joint system to be used.
Appendix 1 of this Technical Note provides information on deck joint systems which have been
satisfactorily used by VicRoads. A list of suppliers of these deck joints is also provided.
3. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Deck joints and their associated anchorages shall be designed for the Ultimate Limit State traffic loads and
movements specified in AS 5100 with particular reference to Part 4 Clause 17.
Repair of deck joints is one of the most common, costly and potentially dangerous maintenance tasks.
Hence, it is essential to design and install these systems in a manner that minimises their maintenance
requirements.
3.2 Fatigue
Deck joints shall be designed for fatigue in accordance with the requirements of AS 5100.4 Clause
17.3.3.
3.3 Movements
Deck joints shall be designed to accommodate Ultimate Limit State movements specified in AS 5100.4
Clause 17.3.4. Components of movement including temperature, creep, shrinkage, prestress, and any
additional construction or settlement movements likely to occur during the life of the bridge should be
considered. Ultimate load factors are given in AS 5100.2.
Deck joints do not normally accommodate full movement due to braking forces. The designer should
ensure that once the available travel of the deck joint has been exhausted, the additional force due to
braking can be resisted by passive earth pressure behind the abutment and the approach slab, if any.
The ultimate joint movement requirements and installation gap at a temperature of 20°C shall be
nominated on the drawings.
3.6 Drainage
Deck joints are rarely completely watertight, and sealing is recommended to prevent the entry of water
and dirt which not only requires a drainage system, but causes staining and deterioration of the bridge
superstructure and substructure.
When deck joint drainage is provided, it should be designed to facilitate inspection and maintenance.
3.7 Installation
Deck joints should be designed and detailed to follow the bridge deck geometry including kerbs and
parapets when used. Specification Section 660 provides installation tolerances, and AS 5100.4
Clause 17.7 specifies a method of determining the bridge temperature at installation.
The most common maintenance requirements of deck joints are anchorage failure which can be
attributed to under-design or poor installation. For this reason Specification Section 660 requires all
deck joints to be installed by the supplier.
3.8 Maintenance
To ensure that deck joints are supplied and installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s
specifications, the supplier shall install the joint and provide a warranty on the serviceability of the joint
for a minimum period of 10 years after installation.
3.10 Detailing
To simplify detailing and fabrication, alignment of skew deck joints should be ‘square’ at crossings of
kerbs and parapets.
4. JOINT SYSTEMS
Compression seal joints are not suitable for skew joints as the cellular seal will be subject to racking
movements which breaks adhesion on the nosings. The most common failure of compression seals is
caused by loss of adhesion and ‘walking’ of the seal out of the recess. All compression seals shall be
installed in accordance with the supplier’s recommendations using a lubricant/adhesive which is
compatible with the seal material.
Cellular compression seals come in many sizes and shapes, but are designed to work within a movement
range. Seals must resist loading from stones and road debris and the walls are subjected to fatigue from
temperature movement and may eventually fail due to tearing or splitting. Joint suppliers shall provide a
test certificate showing that the seal is made from elastomer passing specified material test criteria.
The following steps are typical of the design process required to determine the movement requirements of
deck joints for a particular bridge.
STEP 1 : From the bridge geometry, support conditions and construction sequence, calculate
horizontal stiffness of all supports, including substructure and any stiffness of the deck joints being
considered.
STEP 3 : Determine the average age of the superstructure concrete at the time of installation of the
deck joints.
STEP 4 : Calculate longitudinal and lateral movements due to temperature using the temperature
range from 20°C and the Code coefficient of thermal expansion in AS 5100.5 Clause 6.1.6.
STEP 5 : Calculate movement due to shrinkage using AS 5100.5 Clause 6.1.7 to determine values
of k1 for the appropriate environment and the average age of the concrete and 30 years. Calculate the
movement due to shrinkage using the net value of k1.
STEP 6 : Calculate movement due to creep using AS 5100.5 Clause 6.1.8 to determine values of k2
and k3 for the appropriate environment and the average age of the concrete and 30 years.
STEP 7 : Calculate movement due to braking forces using the longitudinal force obtained from
AS 5100.2 Clause 6.8.2 divided by the stiffness found in STEP 1.
STEP 8 : Tabulate all joint movement components and ultimate load factors from AS 5100.2, and
hence calculate the worst combinations of ULS movements. Braking force movements do not need
to be included in the total movement, provided that designers ensure that once the available travel of
the deck joint has been exhausted, the additional force due to braking can be resisted by passive
earth pressure behind the abutment.
STEP 9 : Choose, and show on the drawings suitable alternative deck joints having sufficient
movement capacity. Show also initial (20°) and maximum gap, and dimensions of deck joint profile
including kerbs and parapet, if any.
6. REFERENCES
MIKE VEREY
PRINCIPAL BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPENDIX 1
Table 1 below shows deck joint system types and suppliers. VicRoads’ information is taken from suppliers’
catalogues – further information may be obtained from the suppliers listed below.
Evazote Austress-Freyssinet
COMPRESSION Firmsec FMS-C Firmsec
20 – 40, 50 – 80
SEAL Miska NH Miska Pty Ltd
Wabo Granor Rubber & Eng
Cipec Wd Austress-Freyssinet
FINGER PLATE 0 – 250
Firmsec FMS Firmsec
Maurer Firmsec
MODULAR Up to 500
SHW Austress-Freyssinet
D.S Brown Steelflex Miska Pty Ltd
37 Prime Drive
SEVEN HILLS NSW 2147 (02) 9674 4044
Austress-Freyssinet Pty Ltd Or Or
Level 3 313 Burwood Road 9810 4527
HAWTHORN VIC 3122