Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 Chandragupta I and Kumaradevi
3 Chandragupta I and Kumaradevi
3 Chandragupta I and Kumaradevi
Chandragupta I would have assumed the sovereign title of mah¹r¹j¹dhir¹ja, after he gained in political power and prestige
as a consequence of this matrimonial alliance.
But Altekar : Had Chandragupta I defeated the Lichchhavis, his son would not have proudly proclaimed his relationship
with those vanquished people, who was called vr¹tya kshatriya in Indian literature.
Altekar himself suggests that the father of Kum¹radevî died without a male heir to the Lichchhavi throne.
Under such circumstances, the Lichchhavi state passed on to Kum¹radevî.
The Imperial Gupta and Lichchhavi states were amalgamated.
Chandragupta I and Kum¹radevî ruled over it conjointly.
During this joint rule, gold coins were issued, bearing the names and figures of both Chandragupta I and Kum¹radevî on
the obverse, and the name of the Lichchhavis on the reverse.
The sphere of political influence of Chandragupta I was increased.
He declared himself an independent ruler.
He assumed the sovereign title of mah¹r¹j¹dhir¹ja.
He, perhaps, also founded the Gupta era in 319 AD.
V¹yupur¹òa and the Vishòupur¹òa : The descendants of Gupta shall enjoy sovereignty over the areas on the banks of the
river Gaóg¹, and all the janapadas of Pray¹ga, S¹keta, and Magadha.
According to an alternative interpretation of the puranic statement, they shall enjoy sovereignty over Pray¹ga, situated on
the banks of the river Gaóg¹, and all the janapadas of S¹keta and Magadha.
This extent of the Imperial Gupta authority is too large for the two predecessors of Chandragupta I, who appear to have
been subordinate rulers.
It is too small for the successors of Chandragupta I, who ruled over an extensive empire till at least the time of
Skandagupta.
After Skandagupta, the frontiers of the Imperial Gupta dominions started contracting.
However, the Imperial Guptas continued to enjoy authority over Bengal till almost the end of their rule.
As the pur¹òas make no mention of Bengal in the above statement, they cannot be taken as describing the extent of
Imperial Gupta dominions after Skandagupta.
Therefore, most of the scholars feel that the puranic statement above is describing the extent of the Imperial Gupta
dominions during the reign of Chandragupta I.
They suggest that he ruled over eastern Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
The first few lines of the Allahabad pillar inscription of Samudragupta are partly damaged.
However, they reveal that Chandragupta I praised Samudragupta in court, and declared him as his successor.
The ‘spurious’ Eran stone inscription of Samudragupta also states that Chandragupta I was very impressed by the valour,
devotion, and conduct of his son.
The Allahabad pillar inscription further reveals that when Chandragupta I declared Samudragupta as his successor, the
faces of other claimants to the throne turned pale.
On this basis, it has been inferred that, despite being selected by his father to as the successor, Samudragupta had to face
stiff resistance.
He could ascend the throne only after defeating the other claimants to the throne.
Perhaps, that is why the circular legend on the obverse of the Standard type of his gold coins, the first coin type issued by
him, refers to his victory in a ‘hundred battles’.