Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copy of AppendixE.1 - Midyear Review Form - T1 3 SY 2022 2023 - EDITED DISPO
Copy of AppendixE.1 - Midyear Review Form - T1 3 SY 2022 2023 - EDITED DISPO
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
If onsite/face-to-face/in
person classroom
observation are not Efficiency
implemented,
• Through observation
of
synchronous/asynch
ronous teaching and
other modalities; or
• Through observation
of a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
modalities; or Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
• Through observation of Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC Efficiency
session
Timeliness
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
focused If onsite/face-to-face/in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
environments person classroom ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
(PSST 2.6.2) observation are not Efficiency
implemented,
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session
Timeliness
7%
Basic 6. Used Classroom observation Quality
Educati differentiated, tool (COT) rating sheet
on developmenta and/or
Service lly inter-observer agreement
s appropriate form done through
learning onsite/face-to-face/in-
experiences to person classroom
address observation
learners’
gender, needs, If onsite/face-to-face/in
strengths, person classroom Efficiency
interests and observation are not
experiences. implemented,
(PPST 3.1.2)
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session
Timeliness
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Timeliness
7%
8. Participated 1. Proof/s of Quality
in collegial attendance in LAC
discussions Sessions/FGDs/meeting
that use s/other collegial
teacher and discussions
learner
feedback
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
to enrich 2. Minutes of LAC Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
teaching Sessions/FGDs/meeting ce Target
practice. (PPST s/ and other collegial Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
4.4.2) discussions on the use
of teacher and learner Efficiency
feedback to enrich
teaching practice.
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of
teaching practices
following participations Timeliness
from LAC
sessions/FGDs/meeting
s/other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective
7%
Efficiency
7%
Timeliness
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
provide annotations) Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
7% Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
learner teaching philosophy in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
centered. the lesson plan or ce Target
(PPST 7.1.2) community work. Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 5. Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Educati various related
on • Committee involvement
works/
Service activities that • Involvement as
s contribute to
the teaching module/learning
learning material writer/validator
process. • Involvement as a
resource
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/School
initiated TV/Radio Efficiency
based instruction
• Book or journal
authorship/co
authorship/contributor
ship
• Advisorship/coordinator
ship/chairpersonship
• Participation in Timeliness
demonstration teaching
• Participation as
research presenter in a
forum or conference
• Mentoring or pre
service/in-service
teachers
• Conducted research
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
within the rating period Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
• Others please specify Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
with annotation on how it
contributed to the
teaching learning
process.
___________________
Rater ____________________
Ratee
_____________________
Approving Authority