Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study No 1 (Mamotseo Morewane, Student No. 201150)
Case Study No 1 (Mamotseo Morewane, Student No. 201150)
Morewane
Surname
Mamotseo Katlego
First Name/s
201150
Student Number
Procurement and Supply Management
Subject
Case Study No. 1
Assessment Number
Melissa
Tutor's Name
03 May, 2023
Date Submitted
X
Submission () First Submission Resubmission
No. 6 Fish River Road
Umlele Springs
Postal Address
Kidd's Beach
East London
5264
mamotseo.morewane@zf.com
E-Mail
(Work)
083 664 2797
Contact Numbers
083 664 2797
Declaration: I hereby declare that the assignment submitted is an original piece of work produced by myself.
Question 1.
1.1 Title:
An investigation into how the absence of a proper procurement process leads to fraud
and irregularities in organisations.
Research Problems:
Research Problems:
Question 2
The data collection method used for this study is interviews. Qualitative interviewing
is a data-collection tool useful in various methodological approaches and may
therefore be applied to address a few research questions (McGrath, et al., 20).
The people to be interviewed will be the employees from various departments within
the company, notably the managers. The interviews will be conducted through either
two methods, face-to-face or online, using platforms like MS Teams or Zoom (DeBose,
2018). The sample size. Interviews will be recorded visually, and then transcripts will
be written down.
Analysis process.
According to Ravindran (2019), qualitative data analysis appears simple to those with
limited knowledge of the qualitative research approach. Still, it is one of the most
challenging tasks for the seasoned qualitative researcher. It is a complex and elusive
part of the qualitative research process. Many inherent challenges in the research
approach make the analysis process demanding (Ravindran, 2019).
1. Prepare and organise your data. This typically involves gathering all of the
audio- or video-recorded interview files into one location, converting
observational notes to electronic format (e.g., MS Word documents or Adobe
PDF), and scanning documents retrieved in paper form (Nina Lester, et al.,
Internal
2020). This process should include a structured naming protocol for each file
and the creation of a master data catalogue that lists each data source, its
storage location, its creator, and the date of its collection. This is two ensure
that the raw data is kept safe in case it needs to be revisited.
2. Review and explore your data. This involves examining the data for patterns
or repeated ideas that emerge—looking for the relative importance of data and
identifying relationships between data sets or themes (Valcheva, 2023).
3. Develop a data coding system. Based on your initial ideas, establish a set of
codes you can apply to categorise your data. A code is simply a short,
descriptive word or phrase that assigns meaning to the data related to the
researcher's analytic interests (Saldana, 2021).
4. Assign codes to the data. For example, qualitative survey analysis may mean
going through each participant's responses and tagging them with codes in a
spreadsheet. As you review your data, you can create new codes to add to your
system if necessary (Bhandari, 2020). Doing this will make it easier to interpret
that data and see whether there are recurring or new themes.
5. Identify recurring themes. Linking codes together into cohesive, overarching
themes. These may be based on similarities and dissimilarities from the data
(Mishra & K. Dey, 2022).
Question 3
Internal
According to various reports, fraud is South Africa's number one economic crime.
Since fraud accounts for 7% of company revenue worldwide, any further increases in
this figure could prove detrimental to an organisation in these difficult economic times.
In South Africa alone, it is estimated that fraud costs the economy above R2 billion a
year (Mongie, 2009).
In the case of FFRA, forensic investigation confirms fraud and other irregularities at
the company, with its CEO, Mamodupi Mohlala, being suspended. The significant
findings were that the CEO committed fraudulent and other irregularities by:
This literature review explores how such activities can be prevented and detected
sooner by defining roles and responsibilities and the importance, implementation and
review of the procurement process within the PPRA.
Jenkins (2021) further elaborates that the procurement process generally involves
several steps. The business identifies particular goods and services that it needs,
sources the suppliers to help the company reach its objectives, negotiates terms
and costs and then purchases and receives the relevant items (Jenkins, 2021).
By having a good procurement process, PPRA will be able to track and account
for every purchase and transaction made, which will avoid findings like:
• The catering service provider was not vetted for tax or BEE compliance;
• The delegation's visit was for 15 and 16 March 2022, but the catering
supplier's invoice was paid for three days.
Internal
• A maximum of 40 people were catered for, but the invoice was issued for
120 people;
This will help the company avoid many other issues and findings and instead
help them optimise their operations. Another way to ensure that the
procurement process works well is to investigate the implementation of e-
Procurement software.
Reviewing and auditing processes are vital as they help organisations in being
able to pick up blind spots and faults in the process for the betterment of the
company. Auditing is defined as the on-site verification activity, such as inspection
or examination, of a procedure or quality system to ensure compliance with
requirements (Various, 2023).
After reviewing its current procurement process, PPRA can implement the
following to help optimise its procurement process:
In closing,
Internal
Question 4
Bhandari further elaborates (2021) the goals of human research often include
understanding real-life phenomena, studying effective treatments, investigating
behaviours, and improving lives in other ways. What you decide to research and how
you conduct that research involve critical ethical considerations.
When conducting research, it is essential to follow and consider ethics, as this affects
the credibility of your research study. Resnik (2020) elaborates that the importance of
ethical norms promotes the aims of the research, promotes the values that are
essential to collaborative work, helps to ensure that researchers can be held
accountable to the public, and promote a variety of other important moral and social
values (B. Resnik, 2020).
There are various ethical issues which need to be taken into consideration when
conducting research:
• Anonymity: Means, according to Bhandari, that you don't know who the
participants are, and you can't link any individual participant to their data
(Bhandari, 2021). It is also essential as it helps establish trust between yourself
and the research subject.
• Confidentiality: means knowing the participants are, but you remove all
identifying information from your report (Bhandari, 2021). Combining anonymity
provides trust and protection for the subjects depending on the information
being shared. An example of this is in the case of PPRA, whereby employees
report on the many fraud activities they've witnessed.
• Potential for harm: As a researcher, you must consider all possible damage
sources to participants. Harm can come in many different forms (Bhandari,
2021). In the case of PPRA, reporting fraudulent activities or actions can harm
the participants. Anvari states (2019) the perceived costs of whistleblowing,
such as the potential for retaliation, social ostracism, income loss,
imprisonment, and physical harm (Anvari, et al., 2019).
• Results communication: According to Zhing & Li (2022), communicating the
research findings is as critical as conducting research from inception to
completion (Zhang & Li, 2022). “The way you share your research results can
sometimes involve ethical issues. Good science communication is honest,
reliable, and credible. It's best to make your results as transparent as possible”
(Bhandari, 2021). In the case of PPRA, the communication of the results can
impact the company, affecting the employees and stakeholders.
In closing, Bhandari (2021) states that defying research ethics will also lower the
credibility of your research because it's hard for others to trust your data if your
methods are morally questionable. (Bhandari, 2021) She further explains that “even if
a research idea is valuable to society, it doesn't justify violating the human rights or
dignity of your study participants” (Bhandari, 2021).
Internal
References
Anon., 2015. LinkedIn. [Online]
Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/benefits-good-defined-procurement-process-
stefan-verhauwen/
[Accessed 02 May 2023].
Anvari, F., Wenzel, M., Woodyatt, L. & Haslam, S. A., 2019. The social psychology of
whistleblowing: An integrated model. Organisational Psychology Review, 9(1), pp. 3-67.
McGrath, C., J. Palmgren, P. & Liljedahl, M., 20. Twelve tips for conducting qualitative
research interviews. Medical Teacher, 21(9), pp. 1002-1006.
Mishra, S. & K. Dey, A., 2022. Understanding and Identifying 'Themes' in Qualitative Case
Study Research. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(3), pp. 187-
192.
Internal
Nina Lester, J., Cho, Y. & R. Lochmiller, C., 2020. Learning to Make Qualitative Data
Analysis: A Starting Point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), pp. 94-106.
Ravindran, V., 2019. Data analysis in qualitative research. RESEARCH SERIES NO.19, 20(1),
pp. 40-45.
Saldana, J., 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3 ed. London: Sage.
Zhang , S. & Li, Y., 2022. Communicating the Research Findings. Applied Research Methods
in Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 89-107.