Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

5/11/2014 Effect of closing the generator breaker when not yet in phase

from the Synchronizing department...


Effect of closing the generator breaker when not yet in phase
Posted by Blackstoneboy on 13 January, 2009 - 12:27 am

Can anyone explain to me what is the effect of closing the generator circuit breaker of which genset is not yet in
phase with the synchronizing bus? Can it create any harmful effect?

abella_rocks at yahoo. com. ph

Posted by Bruce Durdle on 13 January, 2009 - 7:21 pm

It certainly can - effects will range from a loud bang to physical damage to the driver and/or alternator. It will
depend on details of the installation, the strength of the connection to the grid, and the amount of out of synch when
the breaker closes. Even if in synch and rotating a bit fast or slow there will be a very rapid
acceleration/deceleration of the rotating parts which could bend shear bolts or overstress the shaft. This will be
accompanied by a high transient power flow as the external supply acts to pull the incoming machine into line.

It is not a good idea.

Bruce

Posted by Rajesh Kushwaha on 14 January, 2009 - 6:59 am

I thought it will only affect the circuit breaker because of voltage difference across the contact faces of the CB.

If small amount of asynchronism is going to affect generator and drive. What will happen in case of load throw
off from full load?

Can any one throw some more light on this?

Posted by CS A on 14 January, 2009 - 3:47 pm

In the event of a trip from load (sometimes called "load throw-off"), there is some adverse affect on breaker
contacts because of the potential (voltage) difference and the amount of current flowing at the time of breaker
opening. But, there are no adverse effect on rotating equipment (load couplings, bolts, shafts, etc.) as there is
when synchronzing out of phase.

When an attempt is made to try to synchronize a generator out of phase with a grid or other generators, the
magnetic fields of the generator are in opposition (depending on the amount of "asynchronism") to those induced
by the grid. So, the generator rotor (and the shaft of the prime mover to which the generator rotor is connected
via some type of load coupling) have to speed up or slow down, sometimes by as much as 180 degrees, in a very
short period of time. That's where the damage comes into the picture; as fast as it has to speed up or slow down
http://www.control.com/thread/1231824467 1/3
5/11/2014 Effect of closing the generator breaker when not yet in phase

to get into synchronism with the grid field it has to suddenly stop when synchronism is achieved. And, the
damage can be caused by either or both of the sudden speed change and/or the sudden speed stop.

The aftermath of such an event is not a pretty sight. And besides being very costly to remedy (if possible), it can
be harmful or fatal to people in the vicinity of the damage.

That's why there are almost always "synch check" relays in place to prevent inadvertent out-of-synch attempts.
I've never seen a manager move so quickly as when one of his reports grabbed a breaker close switch and
flipped it when the synch scope was at six o'clock (180 degrees out of phase)! Fortunately, the synch check
relay prevented the breaker closure.

Posted by CS A on 14 January, 2009 - 4:46 pm

Think of what happens when you try to force the south pole of one magnet to touch the south pole of another
magnet. They try to repel each other. If the magnets are strong, it will take some force to make them touch,
and if released quickly they will "fly" apart.

Well, that's what's happening when a generator is being synchronized out of phase, or out of synchronism.
Only, the magnetic forces are much stronger (in relation to the amount of asynchronism)!

Posted by blackstoneboy on 15 January, 2009 - 8:17 am

Is it the same as having a line to line fault?? Just like having a three phase system and each line is phase shifted 120
deg with others.

Someone correct my idea if I'm wrong.

If we are to synch manually, of course we have to do adjustments on the speed (considering the frequency only) to
correct the phase angle. Using the the synchroscope as reference, does it have to be stable on the 12 o'clock
position before closing? Also, can anyone explain to me how does the synchroscope work?

Thank you so much to anyone who will help me.

Posted by Phil Corso on 18 January, 2009 - 4:47 pm

Blackstone, the answer is 180 deg. For Control List Technocrats, following is the proof I provided to another
Forum about 6 years ago (almost to the day!):

Neglecting resistance components, then:

Ic = (Eg1*Eg2)/(Xg1+Xgt+Xg2), where, in per unit,

Ic = current flow at closure.


Eg1 = gen 1 generated (emf) voltage.
http://www.control.com/thread/1231824467 2/3
5/11/2014 Effect of closing the generator breaker when not yet in phase

Eg2 = gen 2 generated (emf) voltage.


Xg1 = gen 1 reactance.
Xg2 = gen 2 reactance.
Xgt = system reactance of grid transformer and
OVH transmission line, if they exist.)
Xt = sum of above reactances.

Now, let theta equal the phase-angle between the two generators, so that,

Delta(E) = the vector sum of Eg1 and Eg2. Holding Eg1 at 0deg, and varying Eg2 from theta equals 0 to theta
equals 180deg, yields the following relationship:

Delta(E) = Sqrt[(Eg1^2)+(Eg2^2) - 2*(Eg1)*(Eg2)*Cos(theta)]

Simplifying for the case where Eg1 and Eg2 magnitudes are equal, and using the trigonometric identity, the
equation for Ic simplifies to:

Imax = 2*[|Eg1|*|Eg2|*Sin(theta/2)]/Xt, occurring when theta = 180deq.

Regards, Phil (cepsicon@aol.com)

Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy.
Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal
Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2014 Nerds in Control, LLC. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Fortune
"I didn't know it was impossible when I did it."

http://www.control.com/thread/1231824467 3/3

You might also like