Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategic Analysis of Coca Cola Co.
Strategic Analysis of Coca Cola Co.
7. References…………………………………………………………….13.
STRATEGIC ANALYSIS OF COCA COLA COMPANY.
1. General Background About the Company.
2. Introduction.
The company Coca Cola is one of the biggest corporations in the world that offers
exclusive soft drinks. Its mission is “to refresh the world, to inspire moments of
optimism and happiness and to create value and make a difference.”
This report aims at analysing briefly the strategy of the company. The point of
departure is understanding the internal structures of the company and its culture. The
study will also look at the external context at which the company operates by using
the Mac Kinsey 7-S, PESTEL model and SWOT analysis.
The company’s main competitor is Pepsi Company. The essay will trace the
competitive advantage of Coca Cola using the above models and The Porters Five
Forces. A business issue is isolated that affected the company and a strategy to deal
with it is identified and tested using the five diamond elements of strategy and
VRINE.
3. Method.
The methodology used is restating with understanding information obtained from the
course module, books, journals and publications obtained from the net all of whom
are acknowledged.
The success of the company is determined by the context, practice and content of its
strategy. The structure of the company has attributes of multinational and
transnational therefore unique. This study applies different methods to understand the
structure within the context of strategic management theories. First will be the Mac
Kinsey 7-S framework. Secondly, will be the PESTEL analysis that will help us
understand the company’s external environment and thirdly, will be the SWOT
analysis to understand its internal and external conditions. The study will then
investigate the competitive advantage of the company using the Five Porter’s Forces.
The Mac Kinsey 7-S framework studies the strategy, style, structure, systems,
shared values, skills and staff in order to understand the operations of the
company. The Coca Cola company trades in no-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages.
Our focus in this study will be the non-alcoholic beverages. As stated earlier, the
company leads in the beverages industry. The company owns or licenses and
markets numerous beverages brands such as coca cola, sparkling flavors,
hydration drinks, sports drinks, coffee, tea, nutrition juices and daily and plant-
based beverages. The products are made available to consumers through
independent bottling partners, wholesalers and retailers.
The company has created its own culture and context within which it implements
its strategy and this culture and context is duplicated in all its businesses over the
world. All the partners, associates, suppliers, independent contractors, even their
employees are enjoined to the culture of the company and its standards. The
uniformity has ensured that the strategy of the company is fully realized.
Coca cola integrates and coordinates its many communication channels such as
mass media advertising, personal selling sales promotion, publication relations
and direct marketing strategy to deliver a clear, consistent and compelling
message directly to the consumers. On average, the company spends $2 billion a
year worldwide on marketing (Hu F & Chuang CC, 2009.)
The head office maintains the standards of the company and invest its capital to
maintain and transfer knowledge of these standards at all level of the organization.
4.2.1 Political.
Coca cola receives most of its revenue from international sales of their
products. In the nations the company trades, there are territorial laws, rules
and regulations that must be followed some of which are against the
strategy and therefore frustrate the strategic goals of the company. Such
laws may relate to tax, branding, advertising. It therefore depends on the
governments of the time, how they respond to international trade.
Moreover, regions that are prone of conflicts create an unpredictable
environment for future business forecast therefore risky. Certain
govenments in the world have faced economic sanctions from the United
States of America and that means Coca Cola is likely to meet antagonistic
governments that are being sanctioned by the company’s nation.
4.2.2 Economic.
4.2.3 Social.
4.2.4 Technology.
4.2.5 Environmental.
Clean Water is a very important raw material of the company yet water is
becoming a scarce resource in the world. The has been great concerns by
environmentalists about the water waste in the manufacturing units of the
company that poses a risk of being shut down or engaged in costly legal
battles with government agencies.
Climate change has brought a lot of natural calamities like tsunamis and
droughts that present an obstacle to the operations of the company.
4.2.6 Legal.
The ever-changing tax laws of the different national agencies where the
company is doing business pose an unstable operating environment for the
international company. The company is currently locked in tax litigation
with the United States Tax Agencies. Anti- trusts laws in trade law may
pose a threat to the company therefore affecting the value supply chain of
the company. Health practitioners are petitioning international bodies
concerning the sugar levels and amounts of calories of coca cola substance
and that means health laws might change to accommodate complaints
related to healthiness of the products. The change of these laws may
demand change on the ingredients and the re-branding of the company.
4.3SWOT Analysis.
4.3.1 Strengths.
The fact that the company enjoys the largest share of the market gives it
security and sustainability. The relations built by the company in
partnerships, supplier agreements, bottling agreements, distribution
agreements make it easier for the company to retain its market share and
to introduce new products.
4.3.2 Weaknesses.
4.3.3 Opportunities.
The petitions and complains advanced by health activists about the sugar
and calories in the coca cola products has created an opportunity for the
company to introduce new products that have less sugar or no sugar. This
move ensures that the company’s loyal customers stick with the brand by
just changing products to more healthier products. The company has also
diversified its business by acquiring full ownership or having equity and
partnership in firms that produce tea, coffee, juice and energy drinks. The
company is also taping into the savory snack market.
4.3.4 Threats.
The trade secrets and patents registered in favour of the company do not
invite new entrants into the industry.
The annual financial reports of the company of 2021 reports that the
success of Coca Cola largely depends on the company’s ability to maintain the
brand image it has of its existing products and the corporate reputation and social
license to operate. Product safety or quality issues actual or perceived, or
allegations of product contamination is a high risk that tarnishes the brand image
and also affects consumer preferences.
These complaints against the company by activist concerning these issues and
other human right issues damage the brand of corporate image.
5.2Responses To The Complaints Concerning Consumers’ Health.
In response to the concerns of sugar, the company has introduced other products
that have zero or no sugar. This decision came with capital investment in order to
meet the needs and expectations the section of consumers that complain. The
company now offers reduced flow and low calories beverages across its brands.
The marketing strategy has changed to exclude children under twelve years old.
The advertising now provides transparent nutrition information featuring the
quantity of calories on the front of most of the packages on a range of packaging
size.
5.3.1 Arenas.
The product catagories for zero or no sugar have already been rolled out in
Coke and fanta. The company has used the same bottling companies, same
partners, same distribution channels to sell these products. On top of this
change, the company has acquired full ownership of companies producing
other products such as tea, coffee, hydration products, sports liquids that
combines sport drinks and natural caffein. The company BODYARMOR
and its range of products has been acquired fully by the Coca Cola
company.
The new products are meant to appeal to a different customer base the
company struggled to appeal to before. The geographic areas of impact are
still the same however it is expected that these new products give an
advantage to the company to tap into new markets that ordinarily were not
responsive.
5.3.2 Vehicles.
The company uses the same structures in its new ventures. This means that
the new acquired companies and partnerships join a large network that is
already in existence thus enlarging sales and revenue. The portfolio is
extended to dairy products, nutritious juices, plant-based beverages and
sparkling water. The company may invest capital to their distributing
partners in order to enlarge its distribution of the new products as a decline
is expected of the normal range of products. This is the model the company
has been using all along, to empower its partners through capitalization,
systems upgrade and other assistance.
5.3.3 Differentiators.
The company is also capitalizing its green energy in solar energy in order
to curtail carbon emissions. Such investments are logically sound and
ensures the sustainability of the company.
Will the company be able to exploit its resources and characteristics in order to
continue growing and be competitive on the face of these challenges? We answer
this question using the VRINE model.
5.4.1 Valuable.
The strategy of the company to recruit highly skilled labour and the
existing strategy of the company to retain staff ensures that knowledge is
controlled and that it benefits the company for many years of the life span
of its work force.
5.4.2 Rarity.
5.4.3. Inimitable.
5.4.3 Organization.
Using the different analytical tools for assessing coca-cola's strategy especially in
addressing the challenges of obesity and health concerns we realise that the
organisation is a very successful organisation that is highly valuable, its company
name and brands. We understand that the company has many competitive advantages
over its rivals. In fact, there is currently no other company that is able to match it's
record sales and it's vibrant marketing strategy that leads to astronomical profitability.
The only major rival, Pepsi Company is doing well in sharing some of the company’s
market.
The products the company sells are in the truest sense not rare however the company
holds secrets of production that may not be known by any other, if the company
continues to seal this information as it does now. The company’s trade marks and
patents rights are valuable assets to the company for its sustainability. To challenge or
overcome this advantage by competitors is very difficult. On the face of this
advantage, new entrants to the market would only reduce the market share but not
challenge directly the unique products of the company.
In order to strengthen this competitive advantage or position, the company may invest
more on its research and innovation to introduce more products that are unique to its
brand. Moreover, the company may strengthen it's hold of the trademarks and the
patterns it has over its products by improving its employee benefit schemes to
proprietorship or equity participation.
Further improvements may be made to the company’s supply chain system which
seems to be heavily reliant on the partners and distributors yet these relations are
independent in their operations. There is therefore a threat that if these relations were
to be strained the supply chain and its value would be disturbed. Competitors may use
this disadvantage to infiltrate the market and gain a market share that is not presently
available to them. The company may consider exacting more control on its
distribution channels.
There is a need to maintain and strengthen the strategic advantage of the company in
the market and that means the company should continue to invest in market research
and value addition of its products.
The responses that the company have offered in order to address concerns of medical
practitioners and the consumers of the sugar levels and the calories contained in their
products is positive. The company has responded swiftly by introducing products that
are zero or no sugar additions therefore retaining the brand value and consumer
loyalty. The much talked about threats as a result of climate change has instigated the
company to go green. The company’s campaign that was launched in 2010 is putting
the company on the map of responsible global citizens. The company's decision to
reduce its carbon emission by 15% annually is producing good rewards in terms of
brand value and consumer loyalty. The company's decision to invest in recyclable
material for its containers is highly recommended. The companies investment in
corporate social responsibility and the budget it allocates is well received however
there is room for improvement.
This study was limited in so far as tracing the usage of the budget allocated for social
responsibilities if it is allocated geographically according to business association with
the company or by any other criteria. It is of particular interest and perhaps a subject
for further research if the communities that do not hosts any part or major part of the
company but only consumers of the products are beneficiaries of the funds. I will
proceed on the basis that communities where the company’s businesses are not hosted
are excluded from benefitting.
The recommendation would be that the budget for social responsibility focuses on
social ills of the world and that allocation be done in consideration of not only factors
connected with the business of the company but to consider also other factors such as
general society ills. Poverty, access to medication, high death rates, lack of education,
oppression of vulnerable members of certain societies are some problems experienced
where the products of the company are consumed. It follows therefore that there are
continents that would benefit more from this budget such as Africa and parts of Asia.
REFERENCES.
Hu, F., & Chuang, C. C. (2009). How can different brand strategies lead to retailers'
success? comparing manufacturers brand for coca-cola and private brand for
costco. Journal of Global Business Issues, 3(1), 129-135. Available from
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/how-can-different-brand-strategies-
lead-retailers/docview/223740994/se-2 Accessed 9 September 2022.