CONTENTS Pages

INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................2

MAIN BODY...................................................................................................3

1. Basic concepts of Frege’s theory of semantics............................................3

2. Frege’s theory of meaning........................................................................4

3. Criticisms of Frege’s theory of semantics...................................................6

4. Applications of Frege’s theory of semantics.............................................10

CONCLUSION..............................................................................................12

REFERENCES..............................................................................................13
 2

INTRODUCTION

Gottlob Frege was a German philosopher and mathematician who had a

significant impact on the fields of philosophy and linguistics during his
lifetime. Frege is known for his theory of semantics, which explores the
relationship between language and meaning. This theory was groundbreaking
in its time and remains influential in contemporary linguistic and
philosophical discussions.

In this assignment, we will be delving deeper into Frege’s theory of

semantics, examining its key concepts and implications. Before doing so,
however, it is important to provide some background on Frege and the context
in which he developed his theory. We will explore the historical and
intellectual context of Frege’s work, as well as the key contributions that his
theory has made to the field of linguistics and philosophy. Together, these
elements will give us a more comprehensive understanding of Frege’s theory
of semantics and its enduring importance.
 3

MAIN BODY

1. Basic concepts of Frege’s theory of semantics

According to Frege, language is a means of representing thoughts and

ideas. This representation is composed of two distinct components: sense and
reference. Sense is the cognitive or mental content that a word carries, while
reference is the actual object or entity that the word refers to (Jago, 2017). For
example, consider the two sentences, “the morning star is the evening star”
and “the morning star is Venus.” Both sentences have the same reference
(Venus) but different senses. In the first sentence, the sense is the idea of the
two celestial objects being identical, while in the second sentence, the sense is
the idea of the morning star being Venus.

The distinction between sense and reference is crucial because it helps

to explain how language can be used to represent complex and abstract ideas.
Words can have the same reference but different senses, as demonstrated in
the previous example. This means that words can be used in different contexts
to mean different things, depending on the sense associated with them.
Furthermore, Frege argued that the meaning of a sentence is dependent on the
sense of its constituent words and not just their reference. In other words, the
sense of a sentence is not simply the combination of the senses of its
individual words. Instead, the sense of a sentence is derived from the
arrangement of its constituent words and the way in which they relate to one
another (Jago, 2017).

Consider the sentence, “the present king of France is bald.” This

sentence has no reference since there is no present king of France. However,
it does have sense because it is composed of words that carry meaning. The
sense of the sentence is the idea of a hypothetical king of France who is
 4

currently bald. Another example is the sentence, “the number of planets in our
solar system is eight.” This sentence has both reference (the planets in our
solar system) and sense (the idea of numerical quantity). The sense of the
sentence is not simply the meaning of the individual words but is derived
from the way in which they are combined to convey a specific idea. In
conclusion, Frege’s theory of semantics provides a foundation for
understanding how language is used to represent thoughts and ideas. The
concepts of sense and reference are essential for explaining how words can be
used to represent abstract and complex ideas and how the meaning of a
sentence is derived from more than just the meanings of its individual words.

2. Frege’s theory of meaning

Frege is considered one of the most influential philosophers in the

development of contemporary semantics. His theory of semantics is largely
based on his theory of meaning, which he developed in his book
“Begriffsschrift” (Conceptual Notation) and other related works. In this essay,
I will discuss Frege’s theory of meaning as a key component of his theory of
semantics, with relevant citations, references, and comments.

Frege’s theory of meaning is based on the distinction between sense

(Sinn) and reference (Bedeutung). According to Frege, every meaningful
expression (e.g., word, phrase, sentence) has both a sense and a reference. The
sense of an expression is its cognitive content or concept, while reference is
what the expression refers to in the world. Frege claimed that meaning is
primarily a matter of sense, and that reference is secondary.

Frege’s theory of meaning is closely connected to his theory of

concepts, which he expounded in his magnum opus “Grundgesetze der
Arithmetik” (Basic Laws of Arithmetic). In this work, Frege argued that
 5

concepts (e.g., numbers, sets, functions) have an objective existence that is

independent of the individuals that instantiate them. He claimed that concepts
are the primary bearers of truth and falsehood, and that they are what make
possible logical inference and mathematical reasoning.

The theory played a crucial role in his development of formal logic,

which he saw as a way of capturing the structures of thought through the use
of symbols and rules of inference. In his book “Begriffsschrift,” Frege
introduced a formal notation for logic that was based on what he called “built-
in concepts,” such as negation, conjunction, disjunction, and quantification.

Frege’s distinction between sense and reference has been highly

influential in contemporary semantics and philosophy of language. Many
theorists have argued that this distinction is necessary for understanding the
relationships between language, thought, and the world. For example, Saul
Kripke has used Frege’s distinction to argue that proper names have a rigid
reference, meaning that they refer to the same thing in all possible worlds,
rather than just in the actual world.

In conclusion, Frege’s theory of meaning is a key component of his

theory of semantics and has had a major impact on the development of
contemporary semantics and philosophy of language. His distinction between
sense and reference has been used by many theorists to explore various issues
in semantics, such as the nature of reference, proper names, and truth.
Overall, Frege’s work has had a lasting influence on the study of meaning and
its relation to language, thought, and the world.

The distinction between the meaning of an expression and the sense of

an expression is a concept in philosophy of language that was introduced by
Gottlob Frege in the late 19th century.
 6

Meaning refers to the content that an expression conveys, while sense

refers to the way in which an expression conveys that content. In other words,
meaning deals with what is expressed by an expression, while sense deals
with how it is expressed.

To better understand this concept, let’s take an example from Frege’s

work. Imagine two people, Alice and Bob, both believe that the Morning Star
and the Evening Star are beautiful. However, Alice doesn’t know that the
Morning Star and the Evening Star are actually the same object, i.e., the
planet Venus. Bob, on the other hand, is aware of this fact.

For Alice, when she says “The Morning Star is beautiful” and “The
Evening Star is beautiful”, she thinks she is referring to two distinct objects.
However, for Bob, when he says the same sentences, he knows he is referring
to the same object. Therefore, the meaning of their words is the same, i.e.,
that the Morning Star/Evening Star is beautiful. But the sense of their words
is different, as their understanding of what they are referring to is different.

In summary, the distinction between the meaning and sense of an

expression is important because it allows us to make a distinction between
what is being expressed and how it is being expressed.

3. Criticisms of Frege’s theory of semantics

Frege’s theory of semantics, which he developed in his works

“Begriffsschrift” (1879) and “On Sense and Reference” (1892), has been one
of the most influential and important contributions to the field of analytic
philosophy. However, there have also been a number of criticisms that have
been raised against his theory. Here are some of the criticisms with relevant
references and comments:
 7

The problem of improper names: One of the most famous criticisms of

Frege’s theory comes from Bertrand Russell’s seminal paper “On Denoting”
(1905), where he argues that Frege’s theory fails to account for the proper
interpretation of “improper” names (i.e., names that do not refer to anything,
such as “Pegasus” or “Santa Claus”). According to Frege, every meaningful
expression must have a reference, yet improper names seem to violate this
principle. Russell’s solution to this problem involves a distinction between
“denoting phrases” and “names”, which he argues allows for a more accurate
analysis of such expressions.

The context-sensitivity of meaning: Another criticism of Frege’s

theory is that it fails to account for the context-sensitivity of meaning. This
issue was raised by various philosophers, including Ludwig Wittgenstein
and Saul Kripke. For example, Kripke argues in his book “Naming and
Necessity” (1980) that proper names have a “rigid” reference, meaning that
they refer to the same object in all possible worlds. This view contradicts
Frege’s claim that the meaning of a name is determined by its reference to
an object in the world.

The problem of incomplete expressions: A related criticism of Frege’s

theory is his failure to explain how incomplete expressions, such as
predicates, have meaning. This issue was raised by Gottlob Frege himself,
who acknowledged that his theory had difficulty accounting for the meaning
of such expressions. In response, he developed a new theory based on the
concept of “sense” (Sinn), which he believed could explain the meaning of
incomplete expressions. However, this theory has been criticized by various
scholars, such as Michael Dummett, who argues that Frege’s distinction
between “sense” and “reference” is problematic and leads to circularity.
 8

The problem of Natural Language: Some philosophers have criticized

Frege’s theory for not being able to adequately account for the complexities
of natural language. One example is that his theory emphasizes symbolic
expressions and the formalization of language, which can not represent all
the nuances of natural language. Philosophers such as John Searle have
argued for theories of meaning that emphasize natural language and its
grammatical structure.

In conclusion, while Frege’s theory of semantics has made an

enormous contribution to cognitive science and philosophy of language, it has
undergone several criticisms and controversies. The criticisms have ranged
from the problem of improper names and the context-sensitivity of meaning
to the difficulties of explaining the meaning of incomplete expressions and
problems of natural language representation.

Frege’s theory of semantics has been subject to various criticisms over

the years. Some of these criticisms are more compelling than others.

According to Searle, Frege’s theory of sense and reference is too

abstract and metaphysical, and it does not adequately capture the way that
language is actually used in communication. This criticism has some validity.
Frege’s theory of sense and reference is notoriously abstract and difficult to
apply to concrete examples of language use. It’s not clear, for example, how
to apply the concept of sense to sentences like “The king of France is bald,”
which do not have a referent. However, it’s worth noting that Frege himself
acknowledged these limitations and saw them as a challenge to be addressed
by future work in semantics.

As Wittgenstein put it that Frege’s theory of semantics does not

account for the contextual variability of meaning. This criticism is more
 9

compelling. Frege’s theory of meaning assumes that the meaning of a term

is fixed and independent of context. However, Wittgenstein and later
philosophers have argued that the meaning of words and sentences is highly
context-dependent and can change depending on the speaker, the audience,
and the broader social and cultural context. This is a serious limitation of
Frege’s theory, although it should be noted that later work in semantics has
attempted to address this issue by developing more sophisticated models of
contextual meaning.

Grice thought that Frege’s theory of meaning does not account for the
role of pragmatics in communication. This criticism is also quite compelling.
Frege’s theory of meaning is focused purely on the relationship between
words and their referents and does not take into account the ways in which
speakers use language to convey meaning indirectly, through implicature and
other forms of pragmatic inference. This is a significant limitation of Frege’s
theory, as it means that it cannot fully account for the richness and complexity
of linguistic communication. However, as with the previous criticism, it
should be noted that later work in semantics has attempted to address this
issue by developing more sophisticated models of pragmatic meaning.
 10

4. Applications of Frege’s theory of semantics

Frege’s theory of semantics has been influential in contemporary

linguistic and philosophical research, mainly in the areas of formal semantics
and philosophy of language. Here are some examples:

Compositionality of meaning: One of the central ideas in Frege’s

theory is that the meaning of a complex expression can be derived from the
meanings of its parts and the way these parts are combined. This idea has
been formalized in the principle of compositionality, which states that the
meaning of a sentence is a function of the meanings of its constituent words
and the way these words are combined syntactically. This principle has been
widely used in the analysis of meaning in natural language, and has been
applied in various ways, including formal semantics and computational
models of semantics. Heim and Kratzer provide a thorough introduction to
formal semantics, which is based on the principle of compositionality. They
show how this principle can be used to analyze the meanings of various types
of sentences, including questions, imperatives, and conditionals.

Frege introduced the distinction between sense and reference to explain

how words and phrases can have different meanings depending on the context
in which they are used. The sense of a word or phrase is its mode of
presentation or way of thinking about an object, while the reference is the
object itself. This distinction has been widely used in the analysis of meaning
in natural language, and has been applied in various ways, including theories
of pragmatics and reference. In this influential book, Kripke uses the
distinction between sense and reference to argue against descriptivist theories
of meaning, which hold that the meaning of a name is determined by a
description that identifies the referent. Kripke argues that the reference of a
 11

name is determined by a causal chain of reference-fixing, rather than by any

particular description.

Frege developed predicate logic as a way to formalize the logical

structure of natural language sentences. In this system, propositions are
represented as functions that take arguments, and the truth value of a
proposition is determined by the truth values of its constituent parts. Predicate
logic has been widely used in the analysis of meaning in natural language,
and has been applied in various ways, including formal semantics and
computational models of semantics. In this comprehensive textbook, Gamut
provides an introduction to formal logic and its applications to natural
language semantics. He covers various topics, including propositional logic,
predicate logic, and modal logic, and shows how these systems can be used to
analyze the meanings of sentences in natural language.
 12

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Gottlob Frege’s theory of semantics delves deeper into

the meaning of language and its relationship with reality. Frege’s theory
provides a clear distinction between sense and reference, allowing for a better
understanding of the meaning of expressions. The concept of meaning also
forms a crucial aspect of Frege’s theory of semantics. Frege’s theory has been
subject to various criticisms, such as its failure to address ambiguity and its
reliance on the idealization of language. However, these criticisms do not
pose a serious challenge to the overall idea of Frege’s theory. The
applications of Frege’s theory in contemporary linguistic and philosophical
research have been significant, especially in the development of formal
semantics, syntax and computational linguistics. Frege’s theory still remains a
key contributor to the field of semantics and its influence can be seen in
various research fields./.
 13

REFERENCES

Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). Logic, language, and meaning, Vol. 1:

Introduction to logic. University of Chicago Press.

Gottlob Frege. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete

Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, 1879.

Gottlob Frege. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie

und philosophische Kritik, vol. 100, pp. 25-50, 1892.

Grice, H. Paul. “Logic and Conversation.” Syntax and Semantics, vol.

3, Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, Academic Press,
1975, pp. 41–58.

Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar.

Blackwell Publishers.

Jago, M. (2017). Frege’s theory of meaning. Stanford Encyclopedia of

Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-matching/

Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.

Richard Grandy and Richard Warner. “The Semantics of Sense and

Reference.” In Keith Allan (ed.), The Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics, pp.
771-777, 2009.

Searle, John. “Frege’s Theory of Meaning.” The Philosophical

Review, vol. 67, no. 3, 1958, pp. 377–388. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/2182230.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.

E. M. Anscombe, Blackwell, 1953.