Primer on Material Review

I. b-arugay
R.V.Rivera-Virtudazo
 Schedule of presentation
• Presentation (including preparation): 15 minutes
• Q&A: 7 minutes
• Evaluation: 5 minutes
• Preparation for the succeeding set 2 minutes
– (presentor, panelists, evaluators, timer)
 CRITERIA SHORT DESCRIPTION % RATE
INFORMATION Clarity of information, well referenced, 25
enough extent of information, information
& principles are understood
ORGANIZATION Order of information , principles, thoughts, 25
opinion, cohesiveness of the presentation
VISUALIZATION Clear presentation of tables, figures, images 25
and description
INTEGRITY Total impact of the presentation and the 10
presentor, voice and confidence of the
presentor, manner in answering questions
COMMUNICATION Skill in the medium of language (English is 5
preferred) during presentation and forum
TIME RATIO Each information has enough time for its 10
prescribed breadth during the information
 ROOM LAYOUT
PRESENTOR

DEPOSIT BOX FOR THE

VARIOUS MARKED TIMER
TABLE OF EVALUATION

EVALUATOR PANELIST PANELIST EVALUATOR

Set Presentor Panelists Evaluators Timer Student # & Name

A 2 3 & 4 5 &6 1
B 3 4&5 6&1 2
C 4 5&6 1&2 3
D 5 6&1 2&3 4
E 6 1&2 3&4 5
F 1 2&3 4&5 6
 Panelist
• Evaluate the Presentor • Evaluate the presentor
• Must ask at least two using the table of criteria
questions for any for the presentation of
related purpose of the Material Review
ff:
– Verification / clarification
– Related to structural
analysis
– Technological importance
– Characterization
– Impact on Philippine S&T
 Evaluator for both
Presentor Panelist
• Use the table of criteria for criteria description % rate
the presentation of the clarity Clear construction of 25
material review the question
• At the bottom of the table of significance Importance to the 25
criteria, describe the improvement of
presentor and write one knowledge
statement for each poise Manner in asking 25
descriptor: questions
– Habits/mannerism inquisitiveness Creative curiosity 25
– Oral communication skills (
during presentation
– Suggestions for the
• Describe each panelist and write
Impovement for the one statement for each
presentor descriptor:
– Suggestions for the • Clarity of the construction of
Improvement for the question
presentation
• Clear objective/s of the question
criteria description % rate

clarity Clear construction of 25

the question

significance Importance to the 25

improvement of
knowledge

poise Manner in asking 25

questions

inquisitiveness Creative curiosity 25