Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Version 7.3.

PVsyst TRIAL
PVsyst - Simulation report
Grid-Connected System

Project: Rosegarde house


Variant: New simulation variant
No 3D scene defined, no shadings
System power: 10.80 MWp

PVsyst TRIAL
Rosegarden rampally - India

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
Author

PVsyst TRIAL
Project: Rosegarde house
Variant: New simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.4
VC0, Simulation date:
17/06/23 21:02

PVsyst TRIAL
with v7.3.4

Project summary
Geographical Site Situation Project settings
Rosegarden rampally Latitude 17.47 °N Albedo 0.20
India Longitude 78.64 °E
Altitude 494 m
Time zone UTC+5.5

Meteo data
rosegarden rampally
Meteonorm 8.1 (1996-2015), Sat=100% - Synthetic

System summary

PVsyst TRIAL
Grid-Connected System No 3D scene defined, no shadings

PV Field Orientation Near Shadings User's needs


Fixed plane No Shadings Unlimited load (grid)
Tilt/Azimuth 20 / 0 °

System information
PV Array Inverters
Nb. of modules 32238 units Nb. of units 40 units
Pnom total 10.80 MWp Pnom total 10000 kWac
Pnom ratio 1.080

Results summary
Produced Energy 16673017 kWh/year Specific production 1544 kWh/kWp/year Perf. Ratio PR 79.80 %

PVsyst TRIAL
Project and results summary

Main results
Loss diagram
Predef. graphs
Table of contents

General parameters, PV Array Characteristics, System losses


2
3
4
5
6
P50 - P90 evaluation 7
Single-line diagram 8

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
17/06/23 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 2/8
Project: Rosegarde house
Variant: New simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.4
VC0, Simulation date:
17/06/23 21:02

PVsyst TRIAL
with v7.3.4

General parameters
Grid-Connected System No 3D scene defined, no shadings

PV Field Orientation
Orientation Sheds configuration Models used
Fixed plane No 3D scene defined Transposition Perez
Tilt/Azimuth 20 / 0 ° Diffuse Perez, Meteonorm
Circumsolar separate

Horizon Near Shadings User's needs


Free Horizon No Shadings Unlimited load (grid)

PVsyst TRIAL
PV Array Characteristics
PV module Inverter
Manufacturer Generic Manufacturer Generic
Model TSM-PE14H-335 Model SG250-HX
(Original PVsyst database) (Original PVsyst database)
Unit Nom. Power 335 Wp Unit Nom. Power 250 kWac
Number of PV modules 32238 units Number of inverters 40 units
Nominal (STC) 10.80 MWp Total power 10000 kWac
Modules 1194 Strings x 27 In series Operating voltage 500-1450 V
At operating cond. (50°C) Pnom ratio (DC:AC) 1.08
Pmpp 9777 kWp Power sharing within this inverter
U mpp 914 V
I mpp 10692 A

PVsyst TRIAL
Total PV power Total inverter power
Nominal (STC) 10800 kWp Total power 10000 kWac
Total 32238 modules Number of inverters 40 units
Module area 63960 m² Pnom ratio 1.08
Cell area 56171 m²

Array losses
Array Soiling Losses Thermal Loss factor DC wiring losses
Loss Fraction 3.0 % Module temperature according to irradiance Global array res. 1.4 mΩ
Uc (const) 20.0 W/m²K Loss Fraction 1.5 % at STC
Uv (wind) 0.0 W/m²K/m/s

Serie Diode Loss Module Quality Loss Module mismatch losses


Voltage drop 0.7 V Loss Fraction -0.8 % Loss Fraction 2.0 % at MPP
Loss Fraction 0.1 % at STC

PVsyst TRIAL
Strings Mismatch loss
Loss Fraction

IAM loss factor

30°
0.2 %

Incidence effect (IAM): Fresnel, AR coating, n(glass)=1.526, n(AR)=1.290

0° 50° 60° 70° 75° 80° 85° 90°


1.000 0.999 0.987 0.962 0.892 0.816 0.681 0.440 0.000

PVsyst TRIAL
17/06/23 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 3/8
Project: Rosegarde house
Variant: New simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.4
VC0, Simulation date:
17/06/23 21:02

PVsyst TRIAL
with v7.3.4

Main results
System Production
Produced Energy 16673017 kWh/year Specific production 1544 kWh/kWp/year
Perf. Ratio PR 79.80 %

Normalized productions (per installed kWp) Performance Ratio PR

PVsyst TRIAL
Balances and main results

GlobHor DiffHor T_Amb GlobInc GlobEff EArray E_Grid PR


kWh/m² kWh/m² °C kWh/m² kWh/m² kWh kWh ratio
January 147.5 48.58 23.36 180.8 172.3 1603178 1580185 0.809

PVsyst TRIAL
February 154.8 56.11 26.34 179.1 170.6 1564338 1543255 0.798
March 192.3 71.73 29.84 204.7 194.9 1751286 1727405 0.781
April 190.7 75.35 32.08 187.9 178.5 1594705 1570506 0.774
May 192.6 88.09 33.69 179.0 169.4 1525595 1500505 0.776
June 150.4 86.02 29.37 137.1 129.2 1207314 1182865 0.799
July 127.8 78.50 27.50 117.8 111.0 1048711 1023460 0.804
August 135.0 81.00 26.49 129.1 122.0 1151606 1126714 0.808
September 136.4 68.86 26.41 138.1 130.8 1217812 1194458 0.801
October 139.7 73.21 26.42 152.7 145.4 1354221 1330958 0.807
November 135.8 58.34 24.23 160.2 152.7 1429724 1408591 0.814
December 136.4 54.68 23.01 168.1 160.3 1505679 1484115 0.818
Year 1839.5 840.47 27.40 1934.6 1837.0 16954167 16673017 0.798

PVsyst TRIAL
Legends
GlobHor Global horizontal irradiation EArray Effective energy at the output of the array
DiffHor Horizontal diffuse irradiation E_Grid Energy injected into grid
T_Amb Ambient Temperature PR Performance Ratio
GlobInc Global incident in coll. plane
GlobEff Effective Global, corr. for IAM and shadings

PVsyst TRIAL
17/06/23 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 4/8
Project: Rosegarde house
Variant: New simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.4
VC0, Simulation date:
17/06/23 21:02

PVsyst TRIAL
with v7.3.4

Loss diagram
1839 kWh/m² Global horizontal irradiation
+5.2% Global incident in coll. plane

-2.11% IAM factor on global

-3.00% Soiling loss factor

1837 kWh/m² * 63960 m² coll. Effective irradiation on collectors

efficiency at STC = 16.90% PV conversion

PVsyst TRIAL
19852655 kWh Array nominal energy (at STC effic.)
-0.53% PV loss due to irradiance level

-11.83% PV loss due to temperature

+0.75% Module quality loss

-2.15% Mismatch loss, modules and strings

-1.16% Ohmic wiring loss


16964400 kWh Array virtual energy at MPP
-1.65% Inverter Loss during operation (efficiency)
0.00% Inverter Loss over nominal inv. power
-0.06% Inverter Loss due to max. input current

PVsyst TRIAL
0.00% Inverter Loss over nominal inv. voltage
-0.01% Inverter Loss due to power threshold
0.00% Inverter Loss due to voltage threshold
0.00% Night consumption
16673017 kWh Available Energy at Inverter Output
16673017 kWh Energy injected into grid

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
17/06/23 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 5/8
Project: Rosegarde house
Variant: New simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.4
VC0, Simulation date:
17/06/23 21:02

PVsyst TRIAL
with v7.3.4

Predef. graphs
Daily Input/Output diagram

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL System Output Power Distribution

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
17/06/23 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 6/8
Project: Rosegarde house
Variant: New simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.4
VC0, Simulation date:
17/06/23 21:02

PVsyst TRIAL
with v7.3.4

P50 - P90 evaluation


Meteo data Simulation and parameters uncertainties
Source Meteonorm 8.1 (1996-2015), Sat=100% PV module modelling/parameters 1.0 %
Kind Not defined Inverter efficiency uncertainty 0.5 %
Year-to-year variability(Variance) 0.0 % Soiling and mismatch uncertainties 1.0 %
Specified Deviation Degradation uncertainty 1.0 %

Global variability (meteo + system) Annual production probability


Variability (Quadratic sum) 1.8 % Variability 301 MWh
P50 16673 MWh
P90 16288 MWh
P95 16179 MWh

PVsyst TRIAL
Probability distribution

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
17/06/23 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 7/8
PVsyst V7.3.4
VC0, Simulation date:
17/06/23 21:02
with v7.3.4

You might also like