Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
REGION XI
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF DAVAO DEL NORTE

AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC EVALUATION OF TRAINING PROPOSAL AND ACTIVITY DESIGN

SCHOOL NAME KAWAYAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

DISTRICT Langilan District
TITLE OF TRAINING BRIGADA ESKWELA 2023
DATE AND VENUE AUGUST 14- 19, 2023, KAWAYAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PROPONENT LETECIA S. SONSONA
NAME OF EVALUATOR SHEILA MARIE PAMO

A. RATIONALE (3) /
Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
The rationale describes what the organization is doing and a. Does it describe the mandate of the organization? /
the role of the target participants in achieving the workplace b. Does it identify the gaps in the organization? /
1 development objectives (WDO)
c. Does it describe the workplace development objectives of the organizations? /
d. Does it describe the role of the participants in achieving the workplace objectives? /
Rating Score: 1 1
The rationale mentions the need for the development of the a. Does it mention the competency gaps? /
2 competency in the context of the needs assessment results b. Does it mention a form of assessment of competency? /
c. Does it show some analysis of the assessment results? /
Rating Score: 1 1
The rationale states how the training program will contribute a. Does it describe the competencies will be addressed by the training program?
3 to workplace development objectives (WDO) b. Does it describe how the training will lead to the achievement of the workplace development objectives? /
c. Does it describe the target beneficiaries of the training? /
Rating Score: 0.666666666666667 0.7
TOTAL RATING (Rationale) 2.7

B. Objectives (4)
Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
The program terminal objectives as well as the enabling a. Does it have a terminal objectives? /
1 objectives address gap/s identified in the rationale b. Does it have enabling objectives? /
c. Do the objectives clearly address the identified gaps in the rationale? /
Rating Score: 1 1
The program enabling objectives are logically drawn from and a. Do the enabling objectives contribute to the achievement of the terminal objectives? /
2 will contribute to the achievement of the program terminal b. Are the enabling objectives withinn the scope of the terminal objective? /
objective/s
Rating Score: 1 1
There is a balance of cognitive, behavioral and affective a. Are there cognitive objectives? /
3 objectives b. Are there behavioral objectives relating to skill development? /
c. Are there affective objectives? /
Rating Score: 1 1
Objectives are stated clearly and follow the SMART principles a. Do all the objectives use appropriate words to state the SPECIFIC BEHAVIOR or PERFORMANCE the participants /
should be able to demonstrate?
b. Can all objectives be assessed and evaluated along specified performance (MEASURABLE)? /
4 c. Are all the objectives reasonable and within the capacity of the particpants to achieve given CONDITIONS /
(ATTAINABLE)?
d. can all objectives be achieved within a specific period of time (TIME-BOUND)? /
Rating Score: 1 1
TOTAL RATING (Objectives) 4

a
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION XI
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF DAVAO DEL NORTE

C. Training Content (3)

Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
The key content is aligned to the objectives of the training a. Does the content cover all the stated objectives? /
and follows a logical organization. b. Is the key content relevant? /
1
c. Is the key content up-to-date? /
d. Is the key content logically organized? /
Rating Score: 1 1
The time allotment of the topics reflects their relative a. Does the proposal reflect time allotment for the topics? /
2 importance. b. Is the time allotment proportionate to the relative importance of the topics? /
c. Is the time allotment adequate to be able to cover the key content and achieve the objectives of the session and of
the training as a whole?
Rating Score: 0.666666666666667 0.7
Sources and references identified are credible and reputable. a. Does the proposal cite the references or sources of the key content? /
3
b. Are all the sources and references credible and reputable? /
Rating Score: 1 1
TOTAL RATING (Training Content) 2.7

D. Training Methodologies (2)

Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
The chosen methodologies of training recognize the nature of a. Are the methodologies clearly identified? /
adult learners: active, experiental, social, learning styles. b. Do the identified methodologies maximize participation of learners? /
1
c. Do the identified methodologies make use of participants' prior knowledge and experience? /
d. Do the identified methodologies allow learning in groups? /
Rating Score: 1 1
The procedure of the training method is described. a. Is the procedure of the methodology described in the design or in the session guide? /
b. Is the prodedure easy to follow? /
2 c. Does the procedure consider the availability of materials and context of the learners? /
d. Does the procedure consider the context of the learners? /
e. Can the procedure be done within the time allotment?
Rating Score: 0.8 0.7
TOTAL RATING (Training Methodologies) 1.7

E. Assessment of Learning (2)

Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
The design indicates how learning will be assessed. a. Does the design include assessment prior to and before the training/session? /
b. Are the assessment tools described? /
1
c. Is the assessment mechanism described?
d. Do all the assessment strategies cover all the objectives? /
Rating Score: 0.75 0.7
The design states how the participants will apply their a. Does the design describe how the participants will use their learning in the workplace? /
2 learning either personal or professional lives b. Does the design describe the plan on how the participants will apply their learning? /
c. Does the design describe how the application of learning will monitored and evaluated? /
Rating Score: 1 1
TOTAL RATING (Assessment of Learning) 1.7

F. Resource Packages (3)

Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
The trainer's / LFs package is consistent with the objectives of a. Is the training package consistent with the objectives? /
1 the training b. Is the key content consistent across all the training package? /

a
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION XI
The trainer's / LFs package is consistent with the objectives of SCHOOLS DIVISION OF DAVAO DEL NORTE
1 the training
c. Is the training package aligned to the training methodology and design? /
Rating Score: 1 1
The training package content is relevant, updated, fair and a. Is the content relevant to the training objectives? /
comes from reliable sources. b. Does the training content reflect up-to-date information and developments in the knowledge domain? /
2 c. Does the key content in the training package come from reliable sources and references? /
d. Do all the training materials free of any bias against any group or sector? /
e. Do all the materials show balance in representing relevant sectors and group? /
Rating Score: 1 1
The trainer's / LFs package is well-organized, designed and a. The training resource package is well-written and free of grammatical and structural errors. /
packaged/ branded. b. The language of the training resource package is clear and easy to understand. /
3
c. The package is well-organized. /
d. The package shows the brand of the organization. /
Rating Score: 1 1
TOTAL RATING (Resource Packages) 3

G. Trainers/ Learning Facilitators (3)

Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
The trainers/ learning facilitator are chosen based on set a. Are the criteria for choosing the trainers/ learning facilitators explicitly stated?
1 criteria b. Are the mechanics for identity and choosing the trainers/ criteria explicitly stated? /
c. Are the criteria and mechanics fair for all groups and sectors ( do not disriminate by reason of age, gender, ethnicity, /
etc.)?
Rating Score: 0.666666666666667 0.7
The trainers/ learning facilitatorpossess the necessary a. Are the qualifications of trainers/ learning facilitator stated in the list? /
competencies to handle the given topics and sessions b. Do all the trainers/ learning facilitator meet the criteria? /
2
c. Are the trainers/ learning facilitators assigned to their areas of expertise? /
d. Is there an evidence that trainers/ learning facilitators were oriented on the program and their TORs? /
Rating Score: 1 1
The trainers/ facilitator have expressed commitment to a. Have the trainers/ learning facilitators signed a certification that they will handle the assigned topic/s or session/s? /
3 handle the assigned topics and sessions. b. Is there an evidence that trainers/ learning facilitators were oriented on the program and their TORs? /
c. If the trainer/ learning facilitator is a government personnel, has the head of the office given permission for the
/
involment of the trainer/ learning facilitator in the program?
Rating Score: 1 1
TOTAL RATING (Trainers/ Learning Facilitators) 2.7

H. Program Management (5)

Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
Program Management roles including QAME that cover a. Are the program management roles identified? /
critical areas of program implementation and their b. Are the TORs of the roles described?
corresponding TORs are identified and defined
1 c. Are specific personnel identified for the roles? /
d. Are the roles, TORs, and assigned personnel duly signed by the head of office and program managers? /
e. Is there an evidence that the program management team has been oriented on the program and their roles? /
Rating Score: 0.8 0.7
QAME plan has been detailed a. Is there a QAME plan? /
2 b. Does the QAME plan have identified personnel to perform the task? /
c. Is there an evidence that all QAME associates have been oriented on the program and their roles? /
Rating Score: 1 1
Participant identification, confirmation and registration have a. Are the criteria for participation identified? /
3 been described. b. Is the mechanism for identification, confirmation, and registration described?
c. Is there a list of participants /
Rating Score: 0.666666666666667 0.7

a
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION XI
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF DAVAO DEL NORTE

Size of participants has been set at manageable level/ a. Is there a description of how the participants will be organized as a class? /
4 Proposal describes how participants' size will be managed. b. Is the class size set at a manageable level, i.e. maximum of 60 per class? /
Rating Score: 1 1
Program Implementation readiness has been assessed a. Has the program implementation readiness been assessed? /
5
b. Have all the terms in the readiness checklist been certified to be completed and compiled with? /
Rating Score: 1 1
TOTAL RATING (Program Management) 4.4

I. GAD Mainstreaming (3)

Quality Statement Elements Evaluation
Program/ Activity directly addresses GAD issues or has a. Has HGDG checklist been accomplished? /
1 integrated GAD elements/ concepts and principles as b. Is the HGDG rating at least Gender Sensitive? /
reflected in the HGDG evaluation
Rating Score: 1 1
Design, Resource Package and related materials use gender- a. Is the language used in the program documents and resource packages gender-senstive? /
2 sensititve language b. Are both male and female fairly represented in the resource package and other program documents? /
Rating Score: 1 1
includes M and E of GAD elements in the implementation of a. Is there a GAD M and E plan?
3 the program/ activity? /

Rating Score: 1 1
TOTAL RATING (GAD Mainstreaming) 3

Modified by Arnel F. Labasan - SEPS, School Management Monitoring and Evaluation

Quality Assured by Dr. Ramel M. Pilo - SGOD - Education Program Supervisor/ QATAME Associates
Dr. Medos O. Jala - CID - Education Program Supervisor/ Division Statistician
Approved by Dee D. Silva , DPA , CESO V - Schools Division Superintendent

DDN - SMME21

a
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION XI
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF DAVAO DEL NORTE
LANGILAN DISTRICT
KAWAYAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Office of the Schools Division Superintendent

QUALITY ASSURANCE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, MONITORING AND EVALUATION (QATAME) SUMMARY FORM

TITLE OF TRAINING BRIGADA ESKWELA 2023

DATE AND VENUE AUGUST 14- 19, 2023, KAWAYAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PROPONENT LETECIA S. SONSONA
NAME OF EVALUATOR SHEILA MARIE PAMO

COMPONENTS TOTAL POINTS TOTAL RATING PERCENTAGE

A RATIONALE 3 2.7 90%
B OBJECTIVES 4 4 100%
C CONTENT 3 2.7 90%
D METHODOLOGY 2 1.7 85%
E ASSESSMENT AND APPLICATION OF LEARNING 2 1.7 85%
F TRAINING PACKAGE (PARTICIPANTS AND LFs) 3 3 100%
G TRAINERS/ LEARNING FACILITATORS 3 2.7 90%
H PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 5 4.4 88%
I GENDER MAINSTREAMING 3 3 100%
FINAL RATING 28 25.9 93%
LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE: Substantial Compliance
RECOMMENDED ACTION: May proceed but advised to correct deficiencies; may be subject to audit.

GENERAL COMMENTS/ OBSERVATIONS/ RECOMMENDATIONS: Describe the assessment mechanism properly.

ACKNOWLEDGED BY PROPONENT: LETECIA S. SONSONA Signature:

EVALUATOR: SHEILA MARIE PAMO Signature:

DDN - SMME21