Two researchers, Horowitz and B, are debating which came first, the chicken or the egg. Horowitz claims that their extensive research and studies conclusively show that the chicken came first. However, B argues that Horowitz's most recent study had flaws in its data collection and approach, so it cannot definitively conclude which came first. Horowitz insists they are not wrong, but B maintains that the egg came first in the long-debated chicken-or-egg question.
Two researchers, Horowitz and B, are debating which came first, the chicken or the egg. Horowitz claims that their extensive research and studies conclusively show that the chicken came first. However, B argues that Horowitz's most recent study had flaws in its data collection and approach, so it cannot definitively conclude which came first. Horowitz insists they are not wrong, but B maintains that the egg came first in the long-debated chicken-or-egg question.
Two researchers, Horowitz and B, are debating which came first, the chicken or the egg. Horowitz claims that their extensive research and studies conclusively show that the chicken came first. However, B argues that Horowitz's most recent study had flaws in its data collection and approach, so it cannot definitively conclude which came first. Horowitz insists they are not wrong, but B maintains that the egg came first in the long-debated chicken-or-egg question.
A: We’ve been over this a thousand times. The data
is irrefutable! Look, we’ve done extensive re- search, built studies, and read the literature, and there is conclusive evidence to support my theory!
B: Horowitz, I beg to differ. Even in your most recent
study, the investigative approach was flawed! You know as well as I do that the collection of data was not systematic, and there is a large margin of error. To draw a definitive conclusion based on that data would be misleading
A: That is preposterous!
B: You are trying to single-handedly solve one of the
world’s greatest mysteries, and yet you are oblivi- ous to the fact that you are wrong!
A: I am not wrong! The chicken came first!
Visit the Online Review and Discussion (text version).
2008
c Praxis Language Ltd. B: No! The egg came first!
Key Vocabulary
definitive con- phrase a final judgment that is
clusion not able to be changed; that is final
single- Adjective do something on your
handedly own, without help
investigative phrase way of looking for infor-
approach mation
flawed Adjective having errors or mis-
take
preposterous Adjective crazy, foolish, or silly
oblivious to phrase unaware or don’t know
extensive re- phrase very full and complete
search study to find informa- tion
systematic Adjective using a careful system
or method
irrefutable Adjective correct; not able to be
proved wrong
Visit the Online Review and Discussion (text version).
2008
c Praxis Language Ltd. Supplementary Vocabulary
associated phrase linked or connected
with with
circumstantial phrase a collection of facts
evidence that implies or suggests something to be true, but does not prove it
indicate verb show something to be
true
a compelling phrase an argument that is ca-
case pable of making peo- ple believe that point of view
determine verb find out if something is
true
Visit the Online Review and Discussion (text version).
2008