Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Internship Project # 5: Comprehensive Instructional Renewal Project

August 26, 2023


The candidate works with district leadership to review and map the district's assessment and accountability system
used to monitor student growth. The candidate includes the map of the district's system the following: multiple and
varied assessments; the persons responsible for administering the assessments; the data collection system and
persons responsible for collection and assimilation of the data; the persons responsible for using the data to improve
teaching and learning and who know how that process or system works and how the assessments and data are used
in the professional performance evaluations of teachers and administrators (ELCC 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4).

1) The candidate reviewed the district's professional development plan. If none was available, the candidate
developed a plan that reflected what the district was doing and the needs of the district.
2) In collaboration with several district administrators, the candidate determined what data informed the
development of the plan. The candidate reviewed that data (if none was available, the candidate determined and
documented what data should have been gathered) and made an analysis.
3) Based upon the data analysis, the candidate reviewed the professional development plan again and made
recommendations for improvement based on research and data.
4) The candidate prepared the recommendations into a report that models one that could be given to the district's
board of education and that would be presented to the candidate's mentor or superintendent.

After consulting local board policy, administrative regulations, and/or district leadership, the candidate was able to
determine the district's goals for the use of instructional time.
Based on the goals for the use of instructional time, the candidate conducted an instructional time study of the
district, which focused on the integration of technology into content areas.

The candidate:
1) reviewed the data from the study;
2) presented a report with recommendations for improvement to the districtwide leadership team; and
3) included research that supported the recommendations in the report.

The candidate successfully created a protocol to use for interviewing the following people in the same school
district: the superintendent and a sample of district stakeholders (e.g., board members, principals and parents). The
purpose of the protocol was to determine the district's culture of collaboration, trust, learning and expectations (for
students, staff, administrators and board members).

The candidate developed a comprehensive instructional renewal project that integrated the major components and
theories of school change and improvement and the results of other assessment projects required in this Appendix C
(which were all successfully completed). The candidate successfully completed the following:

1) Conducted a comprehensive analysis of the following district documents or procedures: district improvement
plan; professional development plan; cultural assessment; the process for improving curricular and instructional
programs; curriculum, instruction and assessment analysis; supervision of instruction activities; accountability and
monitoring system for student support; time study; and technology study.

Developed an instructional renewal plan that used the analyses from all of the above plans and projects that included
the following:

a) Comprehensive recommendations for districtwide improvement in curriculum, instruction and assessment;


b) Comprehensive recommendations for improvement in teaching and learning;
c) Comprehensive recommendations for districtwide improvement of systems for data, assessment, technology and
the use of time; and
d) Comprehensive recommendations for districtwide improvement in culture, expectations, and the socio-emotional
and academic growth of all students.
Rubric for Scoring

Standard Project Does Not Meet Standard Meets Standard


Category/Elements
Comprehensive Comprehensive Instructional The candidate worked with The candidate worked with district
Instructional Renewal Renewal Project district leadership to review leadership to review and map the
Project and map the district's district's assessment and
assessment and accountability accountability system used to
Understand system used to monitor monitor student growth. The
and promote student growth. The candidate candidate included in the map of the
the most failed to successfully include district's system the following:
effective and in the map of the district's multiple and varied assessments; the
appropriate system one or more of the persons responsible for
technologies to following: the multiple and administering the assessments; the
support varied assessments; the data collection system and persons
teaching and persons responsible for responsible for collection and
learning within administering the assimilation of the data; the persons
the district. assessments; the data responsible for using the data to
collection system and persons improve teaching and learning and
responsible for collection and who know how that process or
assimilation of the data; the system works and how the
persons responsible for using assessments and data are used in the
the data to improve teaching professional performance
and learning and who know evaluations of teachers and
how that process or system administrators.
works and how the
assessments and data are used 1) The candidate reviewed the
in the professional district's professional development
performance evaluations of plan. If none was available, the
teachers and administrators. candidate developed a plan that
reflected what the district was doing
1) The candidate reviewed the and the needs of the district.
district's professional 2) In collaboration with several
development plan. If none district administrators, the candidate
was available, the candidate determined what data informed the
failed to develop a plan that development of the plan. The
reflected what the district is candidate reviewed that data (if
doing and the needs of the none was available, the candidate
district. determined and documented what
2) In collaboration with data should have been gathered) and
several district made an analysis.
administrators, the candidate 3) Based upon the data analysis, the
was unable to determine candidate reviewed the professional
what data informed the development plan again and made
development of the plan. The recommendations for improvement
candidate was unable to based on research and data.
review that data and make an 4) The candidate prepared the
analysis. recommendations into a report that
3) The candidate reviewed the models one that could be given to
professional development the district's board of education and
plan again but was unable to that would be presented to the
make recommendations for candidate's mentor or
improvement based on superintendent.
research and data.
4) The candidate failed to
prepare recommendations into
a report that models one that
could be given to the district's
board of education and that
would be presented to the
candidate's mentor or
superintendent.
Comprehensive Comprehensive Instructional After consulting local board After consulting local board policy,
Instructional Renewal Renewal Project policy, administrative regulations, administrative regulations, and/or
Project and/or district leadership, the district leadership, the candidate
candidate was unable to was able to determine the district's
Understand determine the district's goals for goals for the use of instructional
and promote the use of instructional time. The time.
the most candidate conducted an Based on the goals for the use of
effective and instructional time study of each instructional time, the candidate
appropriate school in the district. The conducted an instructional time
technologies to candidate reviewed the data from study of the district, which focused
support the audit and made a report with on the integration of technology into
teaching and inadequate recommendations for content areas.
learning within improvement and reported those
the district. recommendations to the The candidate:
superintendent or mentor. 1) reviewed the data from the study;
2) presented a report with
The candidate attempted to recommendations for improvement
conduct a technology study of the to the districtwide leadership team;
district, which focused on the and
integration of technology into 3) included research that supported
content areas. The candidate: the recommendations in the report.
1) reviewed the limited data from
the study; The candidate successfully created a
2) presented a report with few protocol to use for interviewing the
recommendations for following people in the same school
improvement to the districtwide district: the superintendent and a
leadership team; and sample of district stakeholders (e.g.,
3) failed to include research that board members, principals and
supported the recommendations parents). The purpose of the
in the report. protocol was to determine the
district's culture of collaboration,
The candidate did not trust, learning and expectations (for
successfully create a protocol to students, staff, administrators and
use for interviewing the board members).
following people in the same
school district: the
superintendent and a sample of
district stakeholders (e.g., board
members, principals and
parents). The protocol was
unable to determine the district's
culture of collaboration, trust,
learning and expectations (for
students, staff, administrators
and board members).
Comprehensive Instructional The candidate failed to develop a The candidate developed a
Comprehensive Renewal Project comprehensive instructional comprehensive instructional
Instructional Renewal renewal project that integrated the renewal project that integrated
Project major components and theories of the major components and
school change and improvement theories of school change and
Understand and the other assessment projects improvement and the results of
and promote required in this Appendix C other assessment projects
the most (which may not have been required in this Appendix C
effective and successfully completed). The (which were all successfully
appropriate candidate was unsuccessful in completed). The candidate
technologies to completing one or more of the successfully completed the
support following: following:
teaching and 1) Conducting a comprehensive 1) Conducted a comprehensive
learning within analysis of the following district analysis of the following
the district. documents or procedures: district district documents or
improvement plan; professional procedures: district
development plan; cultural improvement plan;
assessment; the process for professional development plan;
improving curricular and cultural assessment; the
instructional programs; process for improving
curriculum, instruction, and curricular and instructional
assessment analysis; supervision programs; curriculum,
of instruction activities; instruction and assessment
accountability and monitoring analysis; supervision of
system for student support; time instruction activities;
study; and technology study. accountability and monitoring
2) Developing an instructional system for student support;
renewal plan that used the time study; and technology
analyses from all of the above study.
plans and projects that included
the following: Developed an instructional renewal
a) Comprehensive plan that used the analyses from all
recommendations for districtwide of the above plans and projects that
improvement in curriculum, included the following:
instruction, and assessment;
b) Comprehensive a) Comprehensive recommendations
recommendations for for districtwide improvement in
improvement in teaching and curriculum, instruction and
learning; assessment;
c) Comprehensive b) Comprehensive
recommendations for districtwide recommendations for improvement
improvement of systems for data, in teaching and learning;
assessment, technology and the c) Comprehensive recommendations
use of time; and for districtwide improvement of
d) Comprehensive systems for data, assessment,
recommendations for districtwide technology and the use of time; and
improvement in culture, d) Comprehensive
expectations, and the socio- recommendations for districtwide
emotional and academic growth improvement in culture,
expectations, and the socio-
emotional and academic growth of
all students.

You might also like