Motion To Clarify Judges Order

You might also like

Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK


------------------------------------------------------------ x INDEX NO. 47075 -10
:
Chase (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A. :
Plaintiff :
: MOTION
: TO
-against- : CLARIFY
: JUDGES
: ORDER
:
:
OSVALDO VALDES :
Defendant :
:
------------------------------------------------------------ x

NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed affidavit of Osvaldo Valdes sworn to on the 29th of

March, 2011 and the exhibits annexed thereto, and upon all the prior pleadings and

proceedings and herein, the Defendant Pursuant to Rule 3212 will move this Court located at 111

Centre Street, New York, NY, 10013, Part 3, Room 428, on the 20th of    April, 2011 at 9:30

AM for a motion to clarify judge's order. This motion is supported by

the pleadings, the law of the State of New York and the accompanying memorandum in support,

all of which demonstrate that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact and that

defendant is entitled to judgment in its favor as a matter of law.    Please take further notice that

these papers have been served on you at least eight    days before the    motion is scheduled to be

heard. You must serve your answering papers, if any, at least two days before such time.

                  1    of    3
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT

I. FACTS

1- Judge FREED issued order on March 15, 2011. Order is in two parts. (EXHIBIT A).

CLARIFICATION PART ONE:

2. Please identify which motion judge FFREED ruled on.

3. Is this order appealable.

CLARIFICATION PART TWO:

4. What happens if Chase fails to return my instrument. How is court protecting my interest.

5. Please clarify New York public officials, judges and clerks interest in JP

Morgan Chase & Co. Domestic and International Stock and interest in JP Morgan Alternative

Investment Assets.    As such, it is impossible for defendant to receive impartial decision from
this

court. Court and plaintiff were aware of this before this trial began against defendant
(Exhibit B).

III. CONCLUSION

Based upon the foregoing, defendant, respectfully requests an order from the court granting

judgment in its favor as a matter of law.

Respectfully submitted,

By Osvaldo Valdes, all rights reserved


184 East 7th Street
New York, NY    10009

                  2    of    3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the foregoing was served by mailing a copy by

United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, on 04 APRIL 2011, as follows:

CHASE BANK USA, N.A.


1985 MARCUS AVENUE, NY2-M352
NEW HYDE PARK, NY 11042

                  3    of    3

You might also like