Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AQA Sociology Media Topic Ten Markers
AQA Sociology Media Topic Ten Markers
AQA Sociology Media Topic Ten Markers
media
TOPIC TEN MARKers
www.tutor2u.net/sociology
Page 2 AQA A Level Sociology topic TEN MARKERS - MEDIA
Outline and explain two ways in which new media has affected the ownership
and control of the media in the UK today. (10 marks)
One way in which new media, such as social media platforms Straight in with the first way,
and other digital media, has affected the ownership and clearly explained.
control of the media is that it has passed more of the control
onto the audience. Pluralists have always argued that the Theory brought in quickly.
audience control media content because they can choose
between a range of providers, but with new media they have
control in a more direct sense. Neophiliacs argue that new Good use of sociological
media allows more interactivity and more choice. The terminology and
audience can select what they want to watch (with understanding of concepts.
innovations like “the red button” and streaming services) and
they can also make the news (as citizen journalists) and
produce their own content. Increasingly media content is built Analysis has an evaluative
from audience contributions. Of course, the extent of this flavour (evaluation is not
audience control could be questioned, as most media required for full marks in
production is still carried out by large media corporations, outline and explain questions)
and most choice is limited to options offered by large
corporations, such as Sky or Virgin. However, it is the case
that the audience increasingly act as their own editor and
scheduler, choosing the media that interests them and Linked back well.
skipping that which does not.
Another way in which new media has affected the ownership Very clear that we have moved
and control of the media is by significantly broadening the onto the second way.
ownership of media. Marxists often point out how the media
is dominated by a small number of huge companies, such as
News International and Disney, who control huge swathes of This explanation of Marxist
media content. They criticise pluralists by saying that there criticisms of pluralism does
are false choices in the media, as companies have multiple eventually help make the point
channels or newspapers or studios, which give the impression but might have been briefer.
of competing with one another. However, with new media,
there really are a lot of new media companies on the block.
Particularly in the arena of news, young people in particular
go far beyond the main tabloid newspapers or main Reference to fake news
broadcasters. This has raised concerns about a growth in fake provides some interesting
news, as some online publications are covered by fewer analysis.
regulations than broadcast news (which has to serve a public
service remit) and newspapers (which are self-regulated).
Some of the new media companies are very small operations,
perhaps run by one or two people, who have been able to
make a mark by getting their products to “go viral”. However,
to achieve this, they often have to produce quite sensationalist
“clickbait”. While some social media companies were bought
up by big media companies (such as Google purchasing A clear link back to the
YouTube) many remain deliberately independent. question at the end.
[405 words]
Examiner comments: Mark Band: 8-10
This is a top band answer. Outline and explain questions, on paper 2, are all about bringing two
parts of the topic together that might not have been taught together. It’s important to try and
have a balanced answer: all the focus being on new media or on ownership and control would
restrict what mark could be achieved. This achieves that balance well with two plausible ways
identified.
The response is analytical, with good use of examples and clear explanations. It is a little long,
but packs a lot in.
Examiner Comments: Mark Band: 8-10
This is a good top-mark answer which is particularly analytical throughout. The two ways are
very clearly identified, placed in a theoretical framework, and developed and analysed
appropriately.
There is a good balance of “ownership and control” and “social class” which is what is required to
score highly on this sort of question.
Item M
Some sociologists argue that it is not owners and editors who control media content, but instead the
audience: media companies just give the audience what they want in order to sell papers or gain viewers
and therefore make money. However, it can be questioned how much real competition there is in the
media market.
Applying material from Item M, analyse two criticisms of the view that the
audience controls the content of the mass media. (10 marks)
One criticism of the view that the audience controls the A criticism is identified,
content of mass media is that, in reality, editors control developed from a hook in the
content and the audience is only one of the factors they would item (“editors who control
consider when making editorial decisions. While the reaction media content”)
of the audience is an important consideration, the opinions of
the owners is also important (as they employ the editors and
could replace them), the views of advertisers and sponsors is Detailed and analytical
paramount as, for many media companies, they are the real reasoning.
customers. Of course, television advertisements (for example)
want to reach the biggest possible audience, but that is not
necessarily their only concern. They would also be concerned
by programmes or stories that damaged their brand or
product. They would not wish to be associated with anything Good use of key terms and
that could upset other markets beyond those that make up concepts.
that audience. Editors will also be motivated by their own
values. Because it is still the case that they are predominantly
white, middle-class, middle-aged men, that particular habitus
is likely to drive their decisions. As such, the demands of the Clear link back at end of chain
audience are an important factor, but they are not in control of reasoning.
of the content of mass media.
Another criticism of the view that audience controls the Again, a hook is found in the
content of mass media is that the media market is somewhat item (“real competition… in
illusory: there is a massive concentration of ownership. The the media market”) and
pluralist argument is that media companies have to make a developed into a clear
profit, so they compete with one another for audiences, thus criticism.
giving the audience the real power. However, this only works
if there really is a plurality of media providers for the
audience to choose from. Bagdikian, for instance, argued that
all the mass media in the US was concentrated in the hands of
five huge companies. While there have been some changes Some useful evidence provided
since he was writing, it is estimated that six companies own to back up the argument.
90% of the media market in the US. Many of those companies
also dominate in the UK. These companies also produce quite
similar content, all seeking the broadest audience possible. As
such, despite the appearance of lots of media choice, actually
there is very little, therefore the audience has an illusion of
power and control, but actually mostly consumes what it is Linked back successfully.
given. .
[369 words]
Examiner Comments: Mark Band: 8-10
A top-band response that successfully mines the item for hooks, develops those hooks into direct
answers to the question and analyses those well. Evaluation is rewarded in Apply and Analyse
questions, and actually this response is quite evaluative, in a very focused way that never stops
answering the question. The contrast between the pluralist approach and criticisms thereof
makes for an evaluative and analytical chain of reasoning in both paragraphs.
Item M
Some sociologists question whether the media really has much effect on its audience, as people are not
simply passive recipients of media messages. However, the amount of money that is spent on advertising
suggests that many believe that the media does affect the audience, even if it is through a more complex
process than some sociologists argue.
Applying material from Item M, analyse two ways in which the media is able
to affect its audience. (10 marks)
One way in which the media is able to affect its audience is, First way is identified and
according to some traditional Marxists, by acting like a clearly links to a hook in the
hypodermic syringe, injecting message into the audience, who item (“passive recipients of
act like “passive recipients”. This idea began really as a media messages”).
panicked response to the early days of mass broadcast media
but was also presented as an explanation for the impact of Useful background.
propaganda, such as in Nazi Germany. While many
sociologists doubt that this model can be accurate for the
media’s impact on adults (as they suggest they are active) it
has been suggested that it could impact children, with
particular reference to violent media images influencing Useful evidence, provided, with
children to be violent themselves. Some have pointed to suitable and focused
Bandura’s Bobo Doll experiment as evidence for this, although evaluation.
there are many criticisms of the validity of the study. Others
point to high-profile cases, such as the Jamie Bulger murder,
where the killers had watched a horror film and copied some
of what they had seen in their attack. While the counter-
argument, that many others receive these media messages
and do not react in this way, is compelling, it is clear that the Link back embedded into the
media does have some direct influence on some of its argument.
audience.
However, other sociologists have suggested that the way the An alternative way is
media influences the audience is more complex than the suggested, developed from a
hypodermic syringe model suggests. Katz and Lazarsfeld hook (“a more complex
developed the two-step flow model which suggests that the process”). This has the
media does influence its audience’s views and behaviour, but advantage of evaluating the
for the most part this is indirect. There are some members of previous way.
any community, workplace or family who are seen as opinion
leaders. These people consume media messages and their Concept well explained.
opinions in relation to those messages then influences a
number of other people. As such, several people may have
watched a television documentary and have different
thoughts about the subject, but many will defer to the view of
the opinion leader in order to be an insider. Those who did
not watch the programme will be sure to watch the next one,
in order not to be left out of the conversations. The theory
does not really address how the opinion leader reaches their Some clear, focused
views (whether they are a passive audient) or how they reach evaluation.
that position, but it does suggest the media still has significant
influence over the audience, all be it indirectly.
Good final link.
[386 words]
Examiner Comments: Mark Band 8-10
A top band response. The item is well used and the two contrasting ways are clearly explained
and developed in a focused, analytical and evaluative way.
There is plenty of sociology in here, and focus is maintained throughout.
Item M
Marxists argue that media is owned and controlled by wealthy, powerful people from the ruling class
rather than by journalists, editors and production teams. They reject the idea that the audience is really
in control of the media.
Applying material from Item M, analyse two criticisms of Marxist theories of
the ownership and control of the media. (10 marks)
One criticism of traditional Marxist theories of the ownership A first criticism is identified,
and control of the media comes from neo-Marxists, who point drawn from a hook in the item
out that the bourgeois owners of media companies do not (“journalists, editors and
have time to micro-manage media content. Marxists suggest production teams”)
the owners have a clear political view and a clear set of
economic interests and ensure that their media companies While the criticism is identified
project those views and disseminates an ideology that quickly, it does take a while to
supports their interests. But in reality, owners can have so explain it and link it to the
many business interests that they can really only control the hook.
big picture, leaving real control of media content down to
editors. Even the editors of large publications or programmes A good theoretical framework.
cannot control everything and give some autonomy to their
journalists. Neo-Marxists point out that this still leads to the
dissemination of bourgeois messages and ideology, but not
because the owner micromanages things, but because the
editors and many of the journalists come from privileged
backgrounds too, and of course they were employed by the
owners or the company and they were likely to employ people
whose opinions and values were a good fit with their own.
Another criticism of the Marxist view of the ownership and Another hook in the item (“the
control of the media is that they largely ignore the role of the audience is really in control”)
audience in controlling media content. Pluralists point out is developed into another clear
that the audience has a lot of choice in terms of what it wants criticism.
to consume, particularly so today with new media providing a
very wide range of different viewpoints and approaches. As
such it is important for media companies to offer the audience
what they want, in order to keep them as their customers. In a
free media market, the companies must meet the demands of
the customers. In this way, the audience actually has a lot of
control over what they consume from media companies. Evaluation is well embedded
While Marxist would suggest that the audience is manipulated into the chain of reasoning,
and, through ideology disseminated by the media, are given very focused and relevant.
false needs, this is criticised for presenting the audience as too
passive. People are able to have real demands for what they
want from the media, and are able to make real market
choices, therefore exercising some real control over media Clear link back.
content.
[358 words]
Item M
In the wake of the News of the World phone-hacking scandal, some argued that the government should
step in and regulate the news media to prevent misbehaviour and “fake news”. In the end, enquiries
recommended a more rigorous form of self-regulation, in the light of arguments about important
freedoms.
Applying material from Item M, analyse two criticisms of the view that the
government should regulate the selection and presentation of the news. (10
marks)
One criticism of the view that the government should regulate A first criticism is identified,
the selection and presentation of the news is the view that the developed from an item hook
freedom of the press is an essential part of a free and (“important freedoms”).
democratic society. While the makers of the news, and
newspapers in particular, have behaved very badly on The whole argument is
occasion, not least in the phone-hacking scandal, which led to developed in a way that is both
the Leveson Inquiry, it is seen as very important that the analytical and evaluative.
government cannot censor the news. In other countries, it is
often seen as a sign of dictatorship or authoritarianism when
the government steps in and prevents newspapers from
publishing something or broadcasters from broadcasting
something. The danger is that they are simply protecting
themselves from criticism, and therefore manipulating public
opinion and avoiding accountability. Having said that, the Some very relevant and
BBC, as a public-sector broadcaster, is subject to government focused evaluation.
regulation (all be it of an arms-length sort, usually free of
political controversy) and is widely applauded for its
independence. As such, some argue that it would be possible
to create a state regulator for the press that was not simply
working for the government of the day (the political party
that was in power). However, the Leveson Inquiry concluded Useful link back.
that a state regulator was not the best approach.
Another argument against state regulation of the news is that A second criticism is
the newspapers already have a process of self-regulation that developed, again from a hook
usually works well, and could be improved. The Press in the item (“self-regulation”).
Complaints Commission was replaced by IPSO in 2014,
following Leveson. It is independent of the government and This is explained well with
get its funding from the bodies it regulates. While some argue evidence.
this means that IPSO, as a self-regulator, is likely to find in
favour of the press and share the norms and values of Some focused evaluation,
newspaper editors, rather than the public, it has very clear embedded into the argument.
codes of conduct to measure complaints against and does take
action. While the board does include (well-respected) people
from the world of news and journalism, it also includes people
from a legal and regulatory background. As such many,
particularly those who work in the field, would argue that
Item M
The media is often accused of being a male-dominated industry. Media productions also seem to reflect
patriarchy, with women often being incidental to storylines or portrayed in a negative way. Some would
point out that audiences, including women, seem to accept these representations.
Applying material from Item M, analyse two reasons why women are
negatively stereotyped in the media. (10 marks)
One reason why women are negatively stereotyped in the A reason is identified, drawn
media is that it is a very male-dominated industry and, in a clearly from a hook in the item
patriarchal society, negative stereotypes about women are (“male-dominated industry”).
widely shared by men. Women are presented in quite limited
roles in the media, with an emphasis on sex. In dramas they
are much less likely to be complex fully-rounded characters Plenty of evidence, both from
than male characters, instead simply fitting a particular type from examples and theory.
(including “femme fatale” villains). Levi Strauss wrote about
binary opposition, and in the male-dominated media world,
men are normal and women are “other”. Many argue that this Clear evaluation.
is an old-fashioned view and that today there are more senior
women in the media industry, and also that women are now
presented in a more positive and realistic way, with more This could have been
female characters in dramas deviating from traditional gender illustrated with a specific
norms, for instance. However, it is clear that male writers, example, although it is
editors and producers continue to present women in a limited important to be selective.
and stereotypical way in the media.
Another reason for negative stereotypes of women in the This second reason is clearly
media, however, is audience demand. Pluralists argue that we identified and drawn from an
get the media we want: media companies are profit-seeking item hook (“audiences….accept
businesses and who need to meet the needs and demands of these representations”).
their audience in order to stay in business. Audiences do not
just tolerate stereotypical representations of women - they
clearly demand it. There is a clear considerable demand for
women in the media to be attractive and sexualized, and
certain character types, like the femme fatale, remain hugely Useful evaluation.
popular. Postmodernists would point out that there is also
significant demand for attractive sexualised male characters, Linked back to the question
and woman are a very important part of the media market. It satisfactorily.
is not so much that women are misrepresented in a
patriarchal society, but that audiences (male or female)
demand entertainment and titillation rather than realism,
especially from fiction, and this tends to include everyone
being presented stereotypically, but that those stereotypes
are not necessarily negative. However, a feminist counter- This evaluative passage is
argument is that there are much wider range of male linked back to the question
character-types, including many more sympathetic and with further evaluation.
Item M
Working-class people feature heavily in the media, for example in television soaps and in comedy shows.
However, the writers, editors and producers tend to be middle class (although they might have working-
class backgrounds) and so do not necessarily show a very accurate picture of working-class life.
Applying material from Item I, analyse two ways in which working-class
people are represented in the media today. (10 marks)
One way that working-class people are presented in the The first way is quickly
media today is through positive stereotypes. Particularly in identified and is drawn from a
television soap operas, working-class characters are often hook in the item(“television
presented as the “salt of the earth”: hard-working, down-to- soaps”).
earth, family-orientated good people. Sometimes this might be
down to writers with working-class backgrounds wanting to
represent a positive version of themselves or their families, or
it might be people marketing a particular product at working-
class audiences and therefore wanting to provide a positive
and sympathetic mirror. Indeed, in soap operas, middle-class
characters are often portrayed as villains, or not to be trusted.
However, many of the television soap operas are made up of
almost exclusively working-class characters so, among the
positive stereotypes there are pretty much all the other
character types there too: the criminals, love rats, drug Some focused evaluation.
addicts, etc. Also it is a representation of working-class
people reserved almost exclusively for soap operas (and a few
television comedy shows) and does not reflect the rest of the Finishes with further
media output. In many costume dramas, for instance, any evaluation, but because it is
working-class character is either a passing peasant with no focused it retains clarity..
lines or a criminal of some sort!
Another way in which working-class people are represented A second way, clearly
in the media today is actually with very negative stereotypes. identified and drawn from a
In television comedies, stand-up routines and documentaries hook in the item (not showing
and reality TV shows, working-class people are regularly an accurate picture of
presented as lazy, feckless, “scroungers” and “chavs”. Owen working-class life).
Jones writes about the “demonization of the working class”.
Programmes like Benefits Street present a very negative view Good examples.
of people who require social security, focusing on those who
cheat the system or do not wish to work. The middle-class
comedian Simon Brodkin has made a career appearing as
cheerful “chav”, Lee Nelson. While some suggest this is a more
three-dimensional character than other TV “chavs” (such as
Little Britain’s Vicky Pollard) it still presents working-class
people negatively and as holding discriminatory views. Some Some evaluation here, and
would argue that shows like Benefits Street are presenting the bringing in a bit of sociology.
truth, not of the working class as a whole but of what Charles
@tutor2uSoc
ALevelSocStudentGroup