INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

TITLE OF THE RESEARCH PAPER

Vienna Convention & Montreal Protocol

By

Name of the Student: SHREYA NAIR

Roll No.: 2017087

Semester: 10

Name of the Program: 5 Year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)

Name of the Faculty Member: Dr. K Sudha

Date of Submission: 05/05/2022

DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY

NYAYAPRASTHA “, SABBAVARAM,
VISAKHAPATNAM–531035, ANDHRA PRADESH

1
 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

VIENNA CONVENTION & MONTREAL PROTOCOL

ABSTRACT

The 1985 Vienna Convention aims to protect human well - being and to safeguard the climate
from all the ozone depletion’s harmful effects. The purpose of the Montreal Protocol 1987 was ^
is to fix through overall control, , the ozone layer & reduction and possible elimination of the
creation and use of ozone-depleting substances. The recent amendment of the Montreal Protocol
2016 - the Kigali Addendum - also regulates fluorocarbons. There are synthetic materials which
are used today as a substitute. However, they are in themselves intensive ozone-depleting
substances. Post component by which the chloro-fluorocarbons (CFCs) deplete ozone had been
demonstrated in the 1970s and ozone depletion was seen in the 1980s, two global arrangements
for the protection of the ozone layer were approved under the auspices of the United Nations
Environment Program (UNEP): Vienna Convention (1985) and Montreal Protocol (1987). These
agreements have since been approved by all UN member states. The purpose of the Vienna
Convention is to save human well-being and to protect the climate from all the destructive
effects of ozone depletion. The Convention supports research exercises, participation and trade in
data between states and public official measures, without in any way recommending any
essential means. In Switzerland, the Vienna Convention has been in force since 22 September
1988. The purpose of the 1987 Montreal Protocol is to fix the ozone layer through a total
reduction and possible disposal of ozone-depleting substances. Its design has meant that the
creation and use of these substances has decreased by over 98% somewhere between 1986 and
2016. Since then, climate change has also reduced sharply and the opening in the ozone layer
over Antarctica seems to have now marked its peak. In any case, we will in principle have to
endure until the mid twenty-first century before we witness the ozone layer’s original state
before 1980, as ozone-depleting products continue to be spilled from existing objects, objects
and waste, which is why these products and elements have a prolonged service life.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2
 TITLE:.........................................................................................................................................4
INTRODUCTION:......................................................................................................................4
GOAL OF THE STUDY:............................................................................................................4
RESEARCH QUESTION:..........................................................................................................4
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:...............................................................................................4
LITERATURE REVIEW:...........................................................................................................5
SCOPE OF THE STUDY:...........................................................................................................5
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY:...........................................................................................5
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE VIENNA CONVENTION & MONTREAL
PROTOCOL....................................................................................................................................6
CHAPTER 2: THE IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS......................................................................10
Important illustrations learned on change towards feasible and tough social orders................12
Rebelliousness system:..........................................................................................................12
Adaptability in execution:......................................................................................................12
Non-party exchange arrangements:.......................................................................................12
Arising issues prone to influence building supportable and versatile social orders..................12
Regions where political direction by the significant level political discussion is required.......13
Strategy proposals on ways of speeding up progress in laying out economical and versatile
social orders...............................................................................................................................13
CHAPTER 3: A GLOBAL FRAMEWORK FOR GREENHOUSE GASES: BEYOND VIENNA
& MONTREAL.............................................................................................................................15
ONGOING STEPS TOWARD A GREENHOUSE GAS CONVENTION..............................17
A. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC)....................................................17
B. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (PCC).................................................17
C. Nonbinding Declarations and Statements.........................................................................18
RESEARCH QUESTION.............................................................................................................19
CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION......................................................................................................20
BIBLIOGRAPHY..........................................................................................................................22
OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS.......................................................................................................22
WEB SOURCES:......................................................................................................................23
JOURNALS & ARTICLES:......................................................................................................24

3
 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

SYNOPSIS

TITLE:
Vienna Convention & Montreal Protocol

INTRODUCTION:
These agreements have since been approved by all UN member states. The aim of the Vienna
Convention is to save human well-being and to protect the climate from all the destructive
effects of ozone depletion. The Convention supports research exercises, participation and trade in
data between states and public official measures, without in any way recommending any
essential means. In Switzerland, the Vienna Convention has been in force since 22 September
1988. The aim of the 1987 Montreal Protocol is to fix the ozone layer through a total reduction
and eventual disposal of ozone-depleting substances. Its design has enabled the creation and use
of these substances to decrease by over 98% somewhere in the range of 1986 and 2016.

GOAL OF THE STUDY:

The aim of the paper is to establish that the reader can comprehend the role of Vienna
Convention, which is to save human wellbeing, and to shield the climate from any destructive
impacts of the exhaustion of the ozone layer. The paper features therefore research exercises,
participation and the trading of data among states, and public official measures, without anyway
recommending any substantial means.

RESEARCH QUESTION:
Whether the role of the Vienna Convention along with the Montreal Protocol allows for concrete
changes to be made in the nations’ collective approach towards to the legislative upholding of
the International Environmental Law?

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
The research methodology adopted is doctrinal method of data collection. It features primary
data like the drafts of Vienna Convention & Montreal Protocol alongwith books containing
commentaries on the conventions. Secondary data is in the form of online data namely, websites
and op-eds in newspapers, magazines etc.

4
LITERATURE REVIEW:
1. David A. Wirth & Daniel A. Lashof, Beyond Vienna and Montreal: A Global Framework
Convention on Greenhouse Gases, 2 Transnat'l L. & CONTEMP. Probs. 79 (1992).
2. Elias Mossos, The Montreal Protocol and the Difficulty with International Change,
10 ALB. L. ENVTL. OUTLOOK 1 (2005).
3. David W. Fahey, The Montreal Protocol Protection of Ozone and Climate,
14 THEORETICAL INQ. L. 21 (2013).
4. International Environmental Law - Montreal Protocol, 101 AM. J. INT'l L. 471 (2007).
5. Bryan A. Green, Lessons from the Montreal Protocol: Guidance for the next
International Climate Change Agreement, 39 ENVTL. L. 253 (2009).

SCOPE OF THE STUDY:

The paper deals with the Vienna Convention & Montreal Protocol, therefore the scope of the
paper is subject to the participation of nations in these Conventions and their contribution of the
2030 SDGs which remarks significant contribution in the International Environmental Law
scenario.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY:

The reader should be able to understand the role of the Vienna Convention and the Montreal
Protocol in addressing the alarming issue of depletion of the ozone layer, raising awareness and
initiating dialogues in nations about the same. A decade-long assessment of the impact of the
conventions on national legislation is in focus for the reader.

5
 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE VIENNA CONVENTION & MONTREAL
PROTOCOL
Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer and Montreal Protocol on Substances
Deplete the Ozone Layer Commitments for the 2030 Agenda for Practical Development and the
Goals for Sustainable Development Presentation Chair of the Conference of the Parties to the
Vienna Convention on the Ozone Layer The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the
Ozone Layer (Montreal Protocol) mutually presents this report for the 2018 High Level Policy
Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF), following the hello from the President of the UN
Economic and Social Council, H.E. Marie Chatardová. The report is coordinated around the
arrangement given in the hello letter and handles the point for the 2018 HLPF: Transformation
towards sensible and solid social orders. It depicts the responsibility in the Vienna Convention
and its Montreal Protocol (Ozone Agreements) for the Sustainable Development Goals analyzed
in 2018 and which are for the most part appropriate to the two settlements. In HLPF 2018, all
reasonable advancement goals should be assessed by the perspective of the given substance, with
explicit accentuation on SDG 6, 7, 11, 12 and 15 in spite of SDG 17. Goals 4, 5, 6 and 16 are that
are not directly relevant to the ozone agreements will therefore not to be referred to in this report.
Given the cross-over in Goals between those inspected for the current year and those explored in
2017, this report (specifically the portrayals of exercises under Goals 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 14 and 17)
expands on and may rehash some data given in past entries. 1 Intelligent examinations have
shown that without the Montreal Protocol, the world would have experienced colossal mishaps
of ozone in all areas. Scientists, anticipating a 3% yearly development in CFCs, have expanded
that 66% of the ozone layer would have been demolished during the period 1974 to 2065. The
resultant unbelievable developments in the hurting UV radiation (300% or more) would have
incited different antagonistic implications for individuals likewise, conditions, recalling gigantic
additions for pace of skin illness, eye cascades, invulnerable system covering what's more, crop
hurt.2 Recent review gives belief to the hypothesis that the mass termination of species that

1
Newman, P. A., Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Fleming, E. L., Frith, S. M., Hurwitz, M. M., Kawa, S. R.,
Jackman, C. H., Krotkov, N. A., Nash, E. R., Nielsen, J. E., Pawson, S., Stolarski, R. S., and Velders, G. J. M.: What
would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated?, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 2113–2128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2113-2009, 2009.
2
Newman, Paul & McKenzie, Richard. (2011). UV impacts avoided by the Montreal Protocol. Photochemical &
photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society
for Photobiology.

6
researchers express happened around quite a while back may have been inferable from the
annihilation of the ozone layer following an extensive stretch of volcanic eruptions. 3 These
findings provide some clues as to what life would have been like without the ozone
arrangements, and underscore the importance of keeping up with and expanding the progress
made so far in declaring the ozone layer. The Vienna Convention, which entered into force in
1985, and its Montreal Protocol, adopted in 1987, have guaranteed that so far the vast majority of
the remarkable highlights of the use and creation of destructive ozone-depleting substances
(ODS) have been deliberately eliminated. Therefore, the ozone layer is being repaired and is
supposed to be restored in the middle of the hundred years. The idea of "guaranteeing that no one
will be abandoned" applies at various levels within the framework of ozone insurance, from the
degree of worldwide discretion, through public or local level to the person. These are
interconnected.

According to the global assessment,

“Both ozone events are generally confirmed by 197 gatherings. In addition, four of the
five additions to the Montreal Protocol - the London, Copenhagen, Montreal and Beijing
additions - have been extensively confirmed and the recently adopted Kigali addition has
previously exceeded the essential number of recommendations to ensure its entry into
force in January. 2019. Comprehensive sanctions are a huge achievement among
peaceful agreements and guarantee that no nation will be abandoned in carrying out the
predetermined measures to protect the ozone layer and the environment. Similarly, the
Montreal Protocol, both in dialogue and decision-making at the global level and in the
time spent gradually getting rid of ozone-depleting substances at the public level, has set
a remarkable illustration of engagement with all partners including states, researchers,
industry and the common society.”

This supports the worldwide implementation of the Protocol and the achievement of its Goals
and contributes through them to the Goals of manageable progress. One of the vital pillars of the

3
Demolished Ozone Layer 252 Million Years Ago Left Trees Sterile from UV Radiation By Sydney Pereira, Aug
2018 http://www.newsweek.com/demolished-ozone-layer-252-million-years-ago-left-trees-sterile-uv-radiation-
801100 (Last accessed 2 May 2022). 

7
implementation of the Montreal Protocol is the multilateral fund for the implementation of the
Montreal Protocol.

“The Fund, working with its four Implementing Agencies and a number of reciprocal offices,
offers monetary and specialized help to non-industrial nations in consenting to their
commitments under the Montreal Protocol. Financing choices are taken by its Executive
Committee, whose enrollment is adjusted among created and non-industrial nations,
guaranteeing that the two gatherings of nations have equivalent load in the direction and the
board of the Fund assets. Until now, the Fund has designated around US$34 4 billion to help 147
non-industrial nations to meet their Montreal Protocol commitments. The asset has kept up with
advancement projects that have supplanted ozone-draining substances with ozone-exhausting
substitutes and progress in non-modern nations. Thus, the conceivable adverse consequences of
the advancement, both in the organizations concerned and for their laborers, have been alleviated
and the organizations concerned are more not kidding, giving financial advantages. Institutional
fortifying and imperative structure are additionally the asset's necessities and have ensured help,
committed and persuading execution regarding works out. (Goal 1: Stop the poor in the entirety
of its designs all over the place; Goal 8: Promote upheld, exhaustive and sensible monetary
improvement full and helpful exercises and great work for all; Goal 9: Build solid systems,
advance far reaching and strong industrialization and develop improvement, Goal 10: Reducing
irregular characteristics inside and between nations, Goal 12: Ensuring achievable usage and
innovative plan).”

The Montreal Protocol has committed to significant responsibilities for food security and a
greener economy, support for human settlements and the battle against natural change. The stage
out of ozone-exhausting substances has contributed an expected US$460 billion in worldwide
advantages somewhere in the range of 1987 and 2060 because of stayed away from harms to
agribusiness, fisheries and materials, for example, plastic and wood that would have been
brought about by the exhaustion of the ozone layer.5 Ozone-draining substances have been
4
van Dijk, A., Slaper, H., den Outer, P.N., Morgenstern, O., Braesicke, P., Pyle, J.A., Garny, H., Stenke, A.,
Dameris, M., Kazantzidis, A., Tourpali, K., and Bais, A.F. (2013): Skin Cancer Risks Avoided by the Montreal
Protocol—Worldwide Modeling Integrating Coupled Climate-Chemistry Models with a Risk Model for UV:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22924540. (last accessed 2 May 2020).
5
Markandya, A. and Dale, N. (2012): “The Montreal Protocol and the Green Economy: Assessing the Contributions
and CoBenefits of a Multilateral Environmental Agreement,” Contribution to the Green Economy Initiative, United
Nations Environment Programme, OzonAction Branch and Economics and Trade Branch, accessible at

8
utilized in numerous areas and items that penetrate our regular routines. Their progression out
has achieved changes in creation and use plans and reinforced more proficient creation
processes, as well as the inventive redesign of articles and gear to utilize greener engineered
compounds. Furthermore, the destructive and ozone-draining sanitizer gas methyl bromide,
which had been broadly utilized in agribusiness, designs and items, has been generally disposed
of (for certain applications to be kept disconnected and before transport to control afflictions and
a few essential purposes), which summons the course of occasions with additional persuading
and more secure different other options. The congregations' new consent to deliberately
eliminate a worldwide expansion in fluorocarbons (HFCs) during the Kigali Supplement is
energized by increased familiarity with the connected likely chances to further develop energy
efficiency in the cooling, cooling and force siphon regions. Enhancements in energy abilities that
occur because of cooling advancement and structure changes will likewise have critical
proposition for the energy field and power framework augmentation plans in farming nations as
necessities, demand and admittance to cooling increment with rising ways of life and natural
changes. At the same time, the change from HFC to environmentally friendly choices has
provoked talks with worldwide safety principle associations with the ultimate goal of updating
existing standards or developing new guidelines to ensure safe and powerful treatment of the
elective substances. (Goal 2: End hunger, accomplish food security and moved along
nourishment and advance economical farming; Goal 7: Ensure admittance to reasonable,
dependable, feasible and current energy for all; Goal 11: Make urban areas and human
settlements comprehensive, protected, strong and reasonable; Goal 12: Ensure economical
utilization and creation designs).

The effects of UV radiation on the mundane environment, crops and forests are widespread.
Long-term exposure to extended UV-B radiation affects many crops, including crops, and trees.
By preserving the ozone layer, the disruption of plant species development and environmental
and agribusiness damage has been reduced. Seas, lakes and rivers, including their UV delicate
amphibian species, are protected from the effects of UV radiation antagonists. Many organic
amphibian entities, particularly phytoplankton, fish hatchlings and small fish, are damaged by
extended UV radiation and organic skeletons face greater natural stress from the more intensive

http://www.unep.org/ozonaction/Portals/105/documents/publications/green-economy-report.pdf, 45, 50. (Last

accessed 2 May 2020).

9
impacts of environmental change and pollution. Security from UV radiation serves to safeguard
amphibious assets, thereby protecting the economies of countries and territories that depend on
these assets. (Goal 14: Conserve and economically use the seas, oceans and marine assets for
viable improvement; Goal 15: Protect, rebuild and promote sustainable uses of the mundane
environment, control wilderness reasonably, combat desertification, and stop and address land
subsidence and end biodiversity misfortune.

CHAPTER 2: THE IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS

“The Montreal Protocol's engineering is intended to screen progress regarding science,
innovation and the climate and to be receptive to new and important turns of events. Its three
Assessment Panels are entrusted with distinguishing arising issues and consistently furnish
parties with cutting-edge, free data on logical, specialized, financial and natural issues,
empowering gatherings to take educated and opportune choices. Subsequently, the Protocol has
been revised multiple times to refine its foundation, fix its controls and incorporate controlled
substances and different measures under its transmit. What's more, the Montreal Protocol has an
inherent component to change the current control estimates settled upon by the gatherings in a
fast and productive way, in view of new logical or specialized data.”

“Utilizing this most optimized plan of attack instrument, the Protocol has been changed
multiple times. An issue that has as of late been distinguished incorporates the effect of
extremely brief substances (VSLS), which are not controlled under the Montreal Protocol
inferable from their generally short climatic lifetime (for example under 6 months).”6

However, which may adversely affect the recuperation of stratospheric ozone accomplished
under the Montreal Protocol. Different issues that require further examination incorporate the
effects of some ozone draining substances with generally low ozone-draining potential that are
not presently controlled under the Montreal Protocol, the cooperation between environmental
change and ozone layer consumption, the possible effect of barometrical geo-engineering as well

6
Oram, D. E., Ashfold, M. J., Laube, J. C., Gooch, L. J., Humphrey, S., Sturges, W. T., Leedham-Elvidge, E.,
Forster, G. L., Harris, N. R. P., Mead, M. I., Samah, A. A., Phang, S. M., Ou-Yang, C.-F., Lin, N.-H., Wang, J.-L.,
Baker, A. K., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., and Sherry, D.: A growing threat to the ozone layer from short-lived
anthropogenic chlorocarbons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11929-11941.

10
as the normal changes in sun powered exercises on the recuperation of the ozone layer. 7 These
and other potential arising issues are being surveyed by the Protocol's Assessment Panels.”

The following quadrennial evaluation by the Panels is supposed to be given toward the finish of
2018 and its significant results will be introduced as part of the commitment to the 2019 round of
the High Level Political Forum. Likewise, as far as ozone-draining potential, there are as yet 1%
of controlled ozone-exhausting substances still needing to be gotten rid of. This incorporates for
the most part hydro chlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and modest quantities of different substances
absolved from the control measures for basic or fundamental purposes, including research center
and scientific purposes, and for process specialist applications. For HCFCs, the excess amounts
with regards to metric tons are as yet extensive and their stage out is a test, particularly
considering the way that the absolute most normal options in contrast to HCFCs are HFCs,
which are currently likely to control under the Montreal Protocol since the reception of the
Kigali Amendment in 2016.8 Besides, staging down HFCs with high a worldwide temperature
alteration potential, by progressing to substances that are both environment cordial as well as
ozone-accommodating, will likewise be testing.

“A further muddling factor is the unlawful exchange controlled substances, given the proceeding
interest for a diminishing stock. As indicated in before entries, a few purposes of ozone draining
substances are not controlled under the Montreal Protocol; but they are observed through the
Protocol's information detailing necessities. This incorporate feedstock utilizes, as well as
isolation and pre-shipment utilizations of methyl bromide. Ozone exhausting substances in banks
(for example hardware, protection froths, substance reserves) are likewise not controlled under
the Montreal Protocol, albeit different choices approach gatherings to oversee and discard such
banks in an ecologically sound way. The discharges of those substances could cause ozone layer
exhaustion and add to environment change, despite the fact that they are probably not going to
invert the continuous recuperation of the ozone layer. The section into power of the Kigali
Amendment is presently guaranteed, with approval by more than the essential number of
7
Arsenovic, P., Rozanov, E., Anet, J., Stenke, A., Schmutz, W., and Peter, T.: Implications of potential future grand
solar minimum for ozone layer and climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3469-3483, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-
3469-2018, 2018.
8
US EPA report (27 Feb 2015): Updating ozone calculations and emissions profiles for use in the atmospheric and
health effects framework model:
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-11/documents/ahef_2015_update_reportfinal_508.pdf (last
accessed 2 May 2022).

11
gatherings. Anyway the greatest conceivable approval and execution is required assuming that
the Amendment is to accomplish its assessed impact of keeping away from up to 0.5°C of an
Earth-wide temperature boost before the century's over. The HLPF can be instrumental in
empowering the leftover gatherings to approve the Kigali Amendment. Accepting the Kigali
Amendment is broadly approved, the period 2020-2030 will especially challenge as emerging
nations should begin staging down HFCs simultaneously as settling the stage out of HCFCs,
which will need proceeded with help from the Multilateral Fund.”

Important illustrations learned on change towards feasible and tough social orders
“The 2017 accommodation to the HLPF featured the critical parts of the Montreal Protocol's
structure and execution that have supported its prosperity. These can be momentarily summed up
as follows: Commitment with all partners including industry: This is one of the principal
qualities of the Montreal Protocol. Industry, science, common social orders, government, and
intergovernmental associations are generally significant accomplices in accomplishing the goals
of the Protocol. The media have likewise helped with bringing issues to light on ozone-related
issues. Innovation move and modern transformation: Funding and innovation move keep on
eliminating obstructions to taking on greener substitutes and elective advancements and to work
with the endeavors of non-industrial nations in building limit, bringing issues to light and
acquainting administrative and consistence measures with meet their Goals under the Protocol.”

Rebelliousness system:
The gatherings screen consistence with the Goals through a strategy that works with consistence
as opposed to rebuffing rebelliousness. Evaluation Panels: The three Assessment Panels give
customary and refreshed data on logical, specialized, monetary and ecological issues,
empowering the gatherings to take educated and ideal choices on complex matters and
guaranteeing that strategies and activities depend on sound science.

Adaptability in execution:
“The gatherings have accommodated different exclusion systems to address the need of
appropriate options in contrast to ODSs. These instruments give a harmony between the basic to
deliberately transition away from controlled substances and the need to guarantee that society
isn't disturbed.”

12
Non-party exchange arrangements:
The arrangement restricting exchange controlled substances with non-parties makes an
motivation for nations to confirm, while working in adaptability in specific conditions.

Arising issues prone to influence building supportable and versatile social orders
“A critical region to be considered under this segment is the exchange between ozone
consumption and environmental change, both in arrangement and in science. As referenced over,
the Montreal Protocol has previously contributed altogether to alleviating environmental change,
and the Kigali Amendment is expanding upon this inheritance. As the planet warms, humankind
is progressively looking for ways of keeping cool, and advancements in the refrigeration, cooling
and intensity siphon areas are inherently involved. The Montreal Protocol advances a change to
ecologically prevalent options that actually meet the everyday requirements of people in a way
that shields wellbeing and security. Simultaneously, the gatherings to the Protocol know that the
development away from HFCs presents amazing chances to catalyze and get enhancements in
the energy effectiveness of apparatuses, hardware and frameworks, which could convey an
assortment of co-benefits for maintainable advancement including for energy security, general
wellbeing and environment mitigation.9 To this end, energy proficiency conversations are
progressing among the parties. There is likewise progressing logical exploration on the
associations between environment warming and ozone layer exhaustion as both ecological issues
sway the climate.”

Regions where political direction by the significant level political discussion is required
With the section into power of the Kigali Amendment on 1 January 2019 now guaranteed,
the center should go to expanding the quantity of sanctions and in the long run
accomplishing the broadest conceivable approval and execution in order to receive the
greatest rewards from the phase down of HFCs with regards to the environment, the
climate, the economy, and society all in all. The support, direction and commitment of the
HLPF could contribute essentially to this goal.

9
Decision XXVIII/3 of the Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol

13
Strategy proposals on ways of speeding up progress in laying out economical and versatile
social orders
The Montreal Protocol presents a helpful contextual investigation in worldwide
collaboration to address new worldwide difficulties for most extreme commitment and
effect, with potential ramifications for future purposeful activity. A portion of these
illustrations are featured here.

To begin with, social orders are, intrinsically, animals of collaboration and arrangement.
Commitment and investment of all parts of a general public - all partners - are vital for its
prosperity and without a doubt its proceeded with presence. The Montreal Protocol's way to deal
with partner commitment has accomplished complete commitment and guarantees value between
the obligations of the created and the creating scene. Besides, clear recognizable proof of an
issue in substantial terms is the initial step to tending to it. Plausible and successful answers for
normal issues of society, including clear advances and obligations, should be founded on precise
and forward-thinking data and skill. Strategy, and natural arrangement, should be grounded in
sound science and returned to over the long haul to assess new turns of events. The attainability
of executing a concurred approach is many times a variable of limit and assets. Gatherings to the
Protocol in November 2017 built up their longstanding obligation to supporting non-industrial
nations in meeting their responsibilities under the Protocol by consenting to renew the
Multilateral Fund, in how much USD 540 million for the triennium 2018-2020.

Progress in achieving the spread out targets and objectives, at an overall and individual country
level, requires standard checking. In the ozone settlements this occurs through two instruments.
At the overall level, it shows up as advancing examination and systematic impression of the
ozone layer itself, under various worldwide noticing programs including specialists from the
made and making world, commanded by the Vienna Convention. At the solitary country level,
typical reports by social occasions of their usage and formation of substances controlled under
the Montreal Protocol are kept an eye on by a warning gathering, again made from both made
and agrarian nations, which is empowered to make ideas for extra movement. Finally, customary
oversight by a unique body, for instance, the Meeting of the Parties ensures that execution is on
track, ensures that social affairs are in consistence with their responsibilities, oversees issues
arising and frames the way forward to stay aware of power expected to achieve the objectives.

14
The maintainable advancement goals are, as depicted by the General Assembly itself, 10
incorporated, indissoluble and interlinked in nature. The Montreal Protocol's experience shows
this fundamental interconnectedness, with parts of the Protocol's execution affecting, either
straightforwardly or incidentally, numerous goals. Also, at the degree of worldwide participation,
various substances are working independently or together towards accomplishing similar goals.

“Existing participation for, like the United Nations Environment Management Bunch
which as of late embraced an activity of planning the covers and possible collaborations
of the exercises, give helpful bits of knowledge into likely areas of collaboration. The job
of the United Nations Environmental Gathering in reinforcing and uniting the messages
from the different multilateral natural arrangements could likewise give a valuable
instrument towards upgrading the ecological boundary in monetary, social also,
formative contemplations covered by other UN accomplices as imagined by its goal 2/5
“Conveying on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, took on constantly
meeting of the UN Environment Gathering on 27 May 2016”

The worldwide outline given by the HLPF presents a significant open door to distinguish not just
duplication of endeavors and regions where collaborations might be improved, yet in addition
holes waiting be filled to guarantee a complete and firm way to deal with carrying out the 2030
plan.

CHAPTER 3: A GLOBAL FRAMEWORK FOR GREENHOUSE GASES: BEYOND

VIENNA & MONTREAL
“Over quite a while back, the “nursery” impact was recognized to policymakers at the most
elevated level of the United States government as an ecological danger of possibly mammoth
proportions.11 Since then, at that point, ozone harming substances (GHGs) that cause an
unnatural weather change have amassed in the climate at a remarkable rate.' Only now, more
than two many years after the fact, have strategy reactions been considered and exchanges on a
multilateral convention on environmental change started. Late advancement in arranging and
executing a global system for managing chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, and other synthetic
substances that exhaust the stratospheric ozone layer has filled good faith about the potential for
10
GA resolution 70/299 - Follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development at the global level
paragraph 2.
11
COUNCIL ON ENVTL. QUALITY, FIRST ANNUAL REPORT 93-105 (1970).

15
progress of global endeavors to safeguard the environment from an Earth-wide temperature
boost. Outflows of CFCs and halons are administered by the Vienna Convention for the
Protection of the Ozone Layer (Vienna Convention) 12 and the Montreal Protocol on Substances
That Deplete the Ozone Layer (Montreal Protocol). 13 The Vienna Convention is frequently
portrayed as a “framework” arrangement whose design is to lay out an institutional reason for
participation in research, trade of data, and conversation of considerable arrangement estimates
like those contained in the Montreal Protocol.”

“Following the passage into power of corrections took on in 1990, 14 the Montreal Protocol will
require an all out deliberately get rid of by industrialized nations in utilization of nineteen of
these synthetic compounds toward the finish of the 100 years. The association between
stratospheric ozone consumption and “nursery” warming is especially critical. CFCs themselves
are strong supporters of a dangerous atmospheric devation. In spite of their generally low focuses
contrasted with other GHGs, CFCs and halons are answerable for twelve percent of the unnatural
weather change capability of current GHG emanations.' Per atom in the climate, these synthetics
depend on multiple times more strong in retaining infrared radiation (heat energy) than carbon
dioxide (C02), the main GHG beginning from human exercises.' Albeit the Vienna Convention
and Montreal Protocol help to address the an unnatural weather change issue in a backhanded,
gradual way by controlling emanations of CFCs and halons, those instruments are a long way
from an extensive GHG system.”

Specifically, the Montreal Protocol doesn't indicate that options in contrast to the CFCs and
halons constrained by the arrangement must be or even ought to be nursery friendly. 15 Significant
decreases in discharges of GHGs other than CFCs, including C0 2, methane (CH4), and nitrous
oxide (N20), are important to guarantee the solidness of the biosphere. Public responsibilities by
individual nations also, purposeful activity by gatherings of huge radiating countries, like the
Group of Seven (G-7) significant industrialized countries, are vital for accomplishing progress
toward significant decreases in GHG discharges. Restricting multilateral instruments are
12
Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, Mar. 22, 1985, T.I.A.S. No. 11097, reprinted in
[Reference File] Int'l Env't Rep. (BNA) 21:3101 (Jan. 1989), and in 26 I.L.M. 1529 (1987).
13
Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, Sept. 16, 1987, S. TREATY Doc. No. 10, 100th
Cong., 1st Sess. (1987), reprinted in 26 I.L.M. 1550 (1987).
14
White House Press Release, 28 WEEKLY COMP. PRES. Doc. 249 (Feb. 17, 1992).
15
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-549, § 612, 104 Stat. 2399, 2648-70 (1990), 42 U.S.C.S. §
7671k (Law. Co-op. Supp. June 1991).

16
additionally expected to go after a dangerous atmospheric devation on a worldwide scale. New
global foundations and dynamic cycles might be alluring or even fundamental. The allure of a
“framework” or “umbrella” settlement practically equivalent to the Vienna Convention, with
related subordinate arrangements practically equivalent to the Montreal Protocol, has
overwhelmed the conversation of multilateral change instruments for quite a while. Sadly a lot of
that exchange, particularly in the United States, has solidified, in the event that not hardened,
around a unbending understanding of the precedential significance of the stratospheric ozone
negotiations.” The motivation behind this article is to inspect the ramifications of the Vienna-
Montreal model and to invigorate banter on the structure and substance of a future worldwide
GHG system that would incorporate all GHGs, not simply CFCs.

ONGOING STEPS TOWARD A GREENHOUSE GAS CONVENTION

“In the beyond quite a long while, there has been a lot of worldwide movement on
logical, specialized, and strategy parts of the nursery issue. Multilateral regard for the
causes, outcomes, and control of worldwide warming has sped up. Therefore, various
critical worldwide endeavors applicable to the structure, content, and timing of
multilateral GHG instruments have been started.”

A. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC)

“The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate
Change (INC), laid out by U.N. General Assembly resolution 16 and detailing straightforwardly to
that body, is the gathering in which discussions on the expected framework convention on
environment change are occurring. As indicated by the General Assembly's command, dealings
on the arrangement are to be finished and the convention prepared for signature by the U.N.
Meeting on Environment and Development, to be held in Brazil in June 1992. Crafted by the
INC has been appropriated between two working gatherings, one on responsibilities and one on
systems. The fourth meeting of talks, held in Geneva in December 1991, created a bound
together arranging text, however extensive conflict on major issues remains. Specifically, the
incorporation of targets and plans for outflows of CO2 by industrialized nations was
exhaustingly gone against by the United States, which is presently actually disconnected on this
question.” The twelve European Community States have required a particular understanding by

16
G.A. Res. 212, U.N. GAOR, 45th Sess., Supp. No. 49A, at 148, U.N. Doc. A/45/49 (1990), reprinted in 21
ENVTL. PoLY & L. 76 (1991) (establishing the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee).

17
June 1992 for “the adjustment of C02 outflows by the year 2000 overall at 1990 levels by
industrialized nations separately or jointly.” 17 All different individuals from the Organization for
Financial Cooperation and Development, with the exception of the United States and Turkey,
have taken comparable positions.”

B. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (PCC)

“The IPCC is presently the key continuous multilateral vehicle for logical and specialized
appraisal of the nursery issue. The IPCC, which met without precedent for November 1988, was
made under the protection of the U.N. Climate Program (UNEP) and the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO) with an underlying order to study the environmental change issue and to
answer to the Second World Climate Conference (SWCC) in fall 1990. More than 35 nations
partake in IPCC exercises, which are dispersed among three working gatherings: a science
working gathering; a functioning gathering concentrating on friendly and ecological effects of
environmental change; and a reaction systems working gathering accused of distinguishing
approaches to adjust to and alleviate the impacts of an Earth-wide temperature boost., The
primary period of the IPCC's work, which originated before the current talks on a framework
environment convention, closed in 1990 with the reception of the Panel's First Assessment
Report, comprising of reports from the three working groups.18 At the Second World Climate
Conference19 delegates of 137 nations considered farther strides on the dangerous atmospheric
deviation issue considering the IPCC's report.”

C. Nonbinding Declarations and Statements

Throughout recent years, various multilateral meetings have shown to be significant events for
invigorating global discussion on an unnatural weather change. The subsequent instruments
include: “The last assertion of a worldwide gathering facilitated by the public authority of
Canada in mid-1988;20 Three significant U.N. General Assembly resolutions;21 The decisions of a

17

18
David A. Wirth, Climate Chaos, 74 Foreign Poly 3 (1989).
19
Ministerial Declaration, Second World Climate Conference (statement from international meeting in Geneva, Oct.
29-Nov. 7, 1990), reprinted in 20 ENVTL. Poly & L. 220 (1990), And In 1 Y.B. INT'L Envtl. L. 473 (1990)
[hereinafter SWCC Ministerial Declaration].
20
The Changing Atmosphere: Implications for Global Security (statement from international meeting sponsored by
Government of Canada in Toronto June 27-30, 1988), reprinted in 5 AM1. U. J. INT'L L. & POL'y 515 (1990).
21
G.A. Res. 212, supra note 29; G.A. Res. 207, U.N. GAOR, 44th Sess., Supp. No. 49, at 130, U.N. Doc. A144/49
(1990), reprinted in 20 ENVTL. PoLY & L. 43 (1990).

18
gathering of worldwide attorneys met by the legislature of Canada in February 1989;” 22 The
announcement of a worldwide gathering went to by seventeen heads of State in the Hague in
March 1989;23 The communiqu6s of the G-7 industrialized nations from their three latest yearly
gatherings;24 Announcements of clerical gatherings facilitated by the Dutch government in
November 198925 and the Norwegian government in May 1990,26 separately; and, The SWCC
Ministerial Declaration.27 There are various models in global natural law of multilateral
gatherings where political specialists lay out a concurred activity plan, which can then act as a
reason for drafting restricting lawful commitments in an ensuing arrangement exchange. For
instance, the requirement for the 1990 alterations to the Montreal Protocol was laid out by a
meeting in London went to by delegates of 124 countries in March 1989” 28 and a proclamation of
80 nations at the principal meeting of the gatherings to the Protocol in May 1989.29

RESEARCH QUESTION
Whether the role of the Vienna Convention along with the Montreal Protocol allows for
concrete changes to be made in the nations’ collective approach towards to the legislative
upholding of the International Environmental Law?

Saving the honesty of the environmental framework requires early, naturally significant
reductions in greenhouse gas emissions on a multilateral premise. There is currently a worldwide
agreement that a key element of the instrument for achieving this commitment will be a
"framework convention", or multilateral agreement. In fact, even as a first step, a framework
convention should verbalise a multilateral greenhouse gas control procedure that integrates the

22
Protection of the Atmosphere: Statement of the Meeting of Legal and Policy Experts (statement from international
meeting sponsored by government of Canada in Ottawa, Feb. 20-22, 1989), reprinted in 5 AM. U. J. INT'L L. &
PoL'Y 529 (1990).
23
ENVTL. POLY & L. 78 (1989).
24
Economic Declaration (statement of Group of Seven major industrialized nations in Paris, July 16, 1989),
reprinted in 5 AM. U. J. INT'L L. & POLY 571 (1990).
25
Noordwijk Declaration on Atmospheric Pollution and Climatic Change (statement of ministerial conference
sponsored by government of the Netherlands in Noordwijk, Nov. 7, 1989), reprinted in 5 Am. U. J. INT'L L. & Poly
592 (1990).
26
Bergen Ministerial Declaration on Sustainable Development in the ECE Region (statement of ministerial
conference sponsored by Government of Norway in Bergen, May 16, 1990), reprinted in 20 ENVTL. PoLY & L.
100 (1990).
27
53 Fed. Reg. 30,566, 30,569, 30,573-74 (1988) (final regulation implementing Montreal Protocol).
28
19 Envtl. Poly & L. 45 (1989).
29
Helsinki Declaration on the Protection of the Ozone Layer (statement from first meeting of parties to Vienna
Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer and Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone
Layer, May 2, 1989).

19
explicit public responsibilities of industrialized countries, while providing extra one-sided action.
A framework convention should also not be seen as a critical goal in itself, but just as an interval
step in the execution of cement manations decreases. A convention should contain explicit
focuses, at least for CO 2, sufficient to save the respectability of the environmental framework
with a satisfactory safety buffer. The so-called "disappointments" considered by the
administration's strategy are those arising from nature conservation calculations which therefore
prove to be meaningless. Expenditure on vulnerability and deferral in the event of unforeseen
failure such as the ozone depletion or significant misfortunes of stratospheric ozone over North
America-or even of generally acknowledged, if unsure, forecasts of environment disturbance are
excused by and large. “Delays have risky ends,”“ 30 composed Shakespeare. This reasonable
exhortation is no place more significant than for a dangerous atmospheric deviation. Lingering
today will cost profoundly maybe not tomorrow, but rather absolutely for the days to come of
our youngsters.

CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION
Through the 1970s and the 1980s, the overall neighborhood out to be dynamically stressed that
ODS would hurt the ozone layer. In 1985, the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone
Layer formalized overall coordinated effort on this issue. This interest achieved the checking of
the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer in 1987. After the Montreal
Protocol was checked, new data showed more horrible than-expected mischief to the ozone
layer. The main Montreal Protocol, embraced in 1987, was the initial phase in a really long time
to defend stratospheric ozone. Under the principal Montreal Protocol plan (1987), made nations
were supposed to begin continuously wiping out CFCs in 1993 and achieve a 20% abatement
similar with 1986 usage levels by 1994 and a half reduction by 1998. Besides, made nations were
supposed to freeze their creation and usage of halons similar with their 1986 levels. After the
Montreal Protocol was checked, new data showed more unfortunate than-expected mischief to
the ozone layer. The Parties to the Montreal Protocol have changed the Protocol to enable,
notwithstanding different things, the control of new engineered materials and the creation of a
financial part to engage arising nations to come. The Montreal Protocol furthermore integrates a
unique change course of action that engages the Parties to the Protocol to answer quickly to new
legitimate information and agree to accelerate the reductions expected on manufactured
30
William Shakespeare, HENRY VI, Part I, act III, sc. 2.

20
intensifies recently covered by the Protocol. These progressions are then normally relevant to all
nations that supported the Protocol. Since that time, the Montreal Protocol has been at least a few
times sustained by both controlling additional ozone-debilitating substances (ODS) as well as by
climbing the date by which recently controlled substances ought to be disposed of.
Notwithstanding changes and adjustments to the Montreal Protocol, the Parties to the Protocol
meet yearly and take a combination of decisions highlighted enabling effective execution of this
critical authentic instrument. Because of measures taken under the Montreal Protocol, surges of
ODS are falling and the ozone layer should be totally retouched near the focal point of the 21st
century.

The London Amendment (1990) changed the ODS emanation plan by requiring the total
phase out of CFCs, halons, and carbon tetrachloride by 2000 in created nations, and by
2010 in emerging nations. Methyl chloroform was additionally added to the rundown of
controlled ODSs, with phaseout in created nations designated in 2005, and in 2015 for non-
industrial nations.

The Copenhagen Amendment (1992) altogether sped up the phase out of ODSs and
consolidated a hydro chlorofluorocarbons (HCFC) phase-out for created nations, starting in
2004. Under this understanding, CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform
were focused on for complete phase-out in 1996 in created nations. What's more, methyl
bromide utilization of methyl bromide was covered at 1991 levels.

The Montreal Amendment (1997) incorporated the phase-out of HCFCs in non-industrial

nations, as well as the phase out of methyl bromide in created and agricultural nations in
2005 and 2015, separately.

The Beijing Amendment (1999) remembered fixed controls for the creation and exchange of
HCFCs. Bro-mo-chloromethane was likewise added to the rundown of controlled substances
with phase-out focused on for 2004.

The Kigali Amendment (2016) controls to stage down the creation and utilization of hydro
fluorocarbons (HFCs) on the grounds that these substances were embraced by enterprises in
getting away from ozone-exhausting substances and they are intense ozone depleting
substances harming to the world's environment.

Taken on in 1985, The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer is the herald to
the Montreal Protocol. The Vienna Convention is a large part of the time called a structure
convention, since it filled in as a system for attempts to shield the globe's ozone layer. The
Vienna Convention didn't anticipate that nations should take significant actions to control ozone

21
depleting substances. Taking everything into account, according to the plans of the Convention,
the nations of the world agreed the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone
Layer under the Convention, to drive that objective.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS
 53 Fed. Reg. 30,566, 30,569, 30,573-74 (1988) (final regulation implementing Montreal
Protocol). G.A. Res. 212, supra note 29; G.A. Res. 207, U.N. GAOR, 44th Sess., Supp.
No. 49, at 130, U.N. Doc. A144/49 (1990), reprinted in 20 ENVTL. PoLY & L. 43
(1990).
 Bergen Ministerial Declaration on Sustainable Development in the ECE Region
(statement of ministerial conference sponsored by Government of Norway in Bergen,
May 16, 1990), reprinted in 20 ENVTL. PoLY & L. 100 (1990).
 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-549, § 612, 104 Stat. 2399, 2648-
70 (1990), 42 U.S.C.S. § 7671k (Law. Co-op. Supp. June 1991).
 COUNCIL ON ENVTL. QUALITY, FIRST ANNUAL REPORT 93-105 (1970).
 Decision XXVIII/3 of the Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol
 Economic Declaration (statement of Group of Seven major industrialized nations in Paris,
July 16, 1989), reprinted in 5 AM. U. J. INT'L L. & POLY 571 (1990).
 G.A. Res. 212, U.N. GAOR, 45th Sess., Supp. No. 49A, at 148, U.N. Doc. A/45/49
(1990), reprinted in 21 ENVTL. Poly & L. 76 (1991) (establishing the Intergovernmental
Negotiating Committee).
 GA resolution 70/299 - Follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development at the global level paragraph 2.
 Helsinki Declaration on the Protection of the Ozone Layer (statement from first meeting
of parties to Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer and Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, May 2, 1989).
 Ministerial Declaration, Second World Climate Conference (statement from international
meeting in Geneva, Oct. 29-Nov. 7, 1990), reprinted in 20 ENVTL. Poly & L. 220

22
 (1990), And In 1 Y.B. INT'L Envtl. L. 473 (1990) [hereinafter SWCC Ministerial
Declaration].
 Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, Sept. 16, 1987, S.
TREATY Doc. No. 10, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. (1987), reprinted in 26 I.L.M. 1550
(1987).
 Noordwijk Declaration on Atmospheric Pollution and Climatic Change (statement of
ministerial conference sponsored by government of the Netherlands in Noordwijk, Nov.
7, 1989), reprinted in 5 Am. U. J. INT'L L. & Poly 592 (1990).
 Protection of the Atmosphere: Statement of the Meeting of Legal and Policy Experts
(statement from international meeting sponsored by government of Canada in Ottawa,
Feb. 20-22, 1989), reprinted in 5 AM. U. J. INT'L L. & Pol’y 529 (1990).
 Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, Mar. 22, 1985, T.I.A.S. No.
11097, reprinted in [Reference File] Int'l Env't Rep. (BNA) 21:3101 (Jan. 1989), and in
26 I.L.M. 1529 (1987).
 White House Press Release, 28 WEEKLY COMP. PRES. Doc. 249 (Feb. 17, 1992).

WEB SOURCES:
 Arsenovic, P., Rozanov, E., Anet, J., Stenke, A., Schmutz, W., and Peter, T.: Implications
of potential future grand solar minimum for ozone layer and climate, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 3469-3483, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3469-2018, 2018.
 Demolished Ozone Layer 252 Million Years Ago Left Trees Sterile from UV Radiation
By Sydney Pereira, Aug 2018 http://www.newsweek.com/demolished-ozone-layer-252-
million-years-ago-left-trees-sterile-uv-radiation-801100
 Markandya, A. and Dale, N. (2012): “The Montreal Protocol and the Green Economy:
Assessing the Contributions and CoBenefits of a Multilateral Environmental Agreement,”
Contribution to the Green Economy Initiative, United Nations Environment Programme,
OzonAction Branch and Economics and Trade Branch, accessible at
http://www.unep.org/ozonaction/Portals/105/documents/publications/green-economy-
report.pdf
 Newman, P. A., Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Fleming, E. L., Frith, S. M., Hurwitz, M.
M., Kawa, S. R., Jackman, C. H., Krotkov, N. A., Nash, E. R., Nielsen, J. E., Pawson, S.,

23
 Stolarski, R. S., and Velders, G. J. M.: What would have happened to the ozone layer if
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2113–
2128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2113-2009, 2009.
 US EPA report (27 Feb 2015): Updating ozone calculations and emissions profiles for
use in the atmospheric and health effects framework model:
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015/11/documents/ahef_2015_update_report
final_508.pdf
 van Dijk, A., Slaper, H., den Outer, P.N., Morgenstern, O., Braesicke, P., Pyle, J.A.,
Garny, H., Stenke, A., Dameris, M., Kazantzidis, A., Tourpali, K., and Bais, A.F. (2013):
Skin Cancer Risks Avoided by the Montreal Protocol—Worldwide Modeling Integrating
Coupled Climate-Chemistry Models with a Risk Model for UV:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22924540.

JOURNALS & ARTICLES:

 David A. Wirth, Climate Chaos, 74 Foreign Poly 3 (1989).
 Newman, Paul & McKenzie, Richard. (2011). UV impacts avoided by the Montreal
Protocol. Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European
Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.
 Oram, D. E., Ashfold, M. J., Laube, J. C., Gooch, L. J., Humphrey, S., Sturges, W. T.,
Leedham-Elvidge, E., Forster, G. L., Harris, N. R. P., Mead, M. I., Samah, A. A., Phang,
S. M., Ou-Yang, C.-F., Lin, N.-H., Wang, J.-L., Baker, A. K., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
and Sherry, D.: A growing threat to the ozone layer from short-lived anthropogenic
chlorocarbons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11929-11941.
 The Changing Atmosphere: Implications for Global Security (statement from
international meeting sponsored by Government of Canada in Toronto June 27-30, 1988),
reprinted in 5 AM1. U. J. INT'L L. & Pol'y 515 (1990).
 William Shakespeare, HENRY VI, Part I, act III, sc. 2.

24