Geotechnical Investigation Program Mumbai Metro Line Package-3 UGC-02 (Tunnels)

Page 1
MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016
PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
CONTRACT UGC-02
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND STATIONS
AT C.S.T, KALBADEVI, GIRGAON AND GRANT ROAD AND
ASSOCIATED TUNNELS
PROGRAM OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)
(STAGE-I)
MUMBAI METRO LINE -3 (COLABA-BANDA-SEEPZ)
PACKAGE UGC-02
HCC-MMS JV
1
Page 2
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
INDEX
Sr. No. DESCRIPTION Page
1. INTRODUCTION 03
2. SAILENT FEATURES 03
3. PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT 03
4. REVIEW OF GEOLOGICAL DATA 04
5. LOCATION OF INVESTIGATION 04
6. TYPE OF INVESTIGATION 06
7. LABORATORY & INSITU TEST PLAN 09
8. SPECIFICATION OF INVESTIGATION 12
9. METHODOLOGY OF GI 18
10. RELEVANT IS CODES & STANDARDS 18
11. MACHINERY TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 20
12. DEFINITIONS 21
13. RESPONSIBILITIES 21
14. RISK MANAGEMENT 22
15. HANDLING OF EMERGENCIES 23
16. ENCLOSURES 23
2
Page 3
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
1. INTRODUCTION
Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Ltd (MMRCL) awarded the works for Package UGC -02
of Mumbai Metro Line-3 to HCC-MMS JV. Works includes Design and Construction of
Underground Stations at CST, Kalbadevi, Girgaon and Grant Road and Associated
Tunnels. Additional Geotechnical Investigations (GI) including Exploratory Drilling,
Geophysical testing, In-situ & Laboratory testing of soil, rock & water samples has been
planned along proposed alignment of Underground stations & associated tunnels to
collect Geotechnical parameters to firm up the design & planning of the project.
2. SALIENT FEATURES OF PACKAGE (UGC-02)

TBM Tunnels: Twin Tunnel (North bound & South bound)
North Bound Tunnel : 3817.038m (From Ch. 4025.579m to Ch. 7842.617m).
South Bound Tunnel : 3804.167m (From Ch. 4056.053 to Ch. 7860.220m).
Metro Station : 4 nos. Underground Station
• CST Station : 255m

• Kalbadevi Station : 208m
• Girgaon Station : 292m
• Grant Road Station : 202m
3. PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT
This document sets out the detailed Geotechnical Investigation (GI) program for
conducting additional Investigation in order to collect all pertinent and reliable data and
information required to produce a safe and durable design. Document includes Detailed
Investigation Plan, Investigation types, location & depth of Investigation, Standard
format, Technical Specifications, proposed organization chart & reporting formats of
Investigation.
3
Page 4
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
4. REVIEW OF GEOLOGICAL DATA
To establish the Geological model for Planning & Design purpose of package UGC-02,
all the available Geological data and Geotechnical Factual Report reviewed and it is
found that, few additional GI will be required to carry out at selected location to get
pertinent and reliable data and information to produce safe and durable design and also
to meet Contract requirement.
5. LOCATION OF INVESTIGATION
On the basis of compiling, reviewing & Interpretation of available Geological model of
package UGC-02, it has been proposed to conduct additional Geotechnical Investigation
(GI) in two stages (STAGE-I & STAGE-II).
STAGE-I investigation includes the GI required to develop initial Geological model to

finalise Geotechnical parameters to develop design planning and design basis for
preliminary design and will be taken as priority basis.
STAGE-II investigation includes the GI required for detailed design purpose. The
location & quantities of stage-2 investigation is tentative only and will be finalised on the
basis of results of STAGE-I investigation.
Table-1, Location of Geotechnical Investigation (STAGE-I)
DRILL HOLES
Tunnel Alignment
Sl. No. Drill hole Chainage-m Depth-m Location
1 TDH-1 4275 30 Tunnel Alignment
4
Page 5
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
Stations
Gallery of CST
1 SDH-1 3700 20 Station
Gallery of CST
2 SDH-2 3786 20 Station
3 SDH-3 3800 30 CST Station
5 SDH-11 4840 35 Kalbadevi Station
6 SDH-17 5640 35 Girgaon Station
7 SDH-21 6990 35 Grant Road Station
Table-2, Location of Geotechnical Investigation (STAGE-II)
DRILL HOLES
Tunnel Alignment
Sl. No. Drill hole Chainage -m Depth-m Location
Stations
2 SDH-5 4000 30
3 SDH-7 4690 35
4 SDH-8 4710 35
5 SDH-9 4750 35 Kalbadevi Station
6 SDH-10 4795 35
7 SDH-12 4895 35
8 SDH-13 5370 35
9 SDH-14 5420 35
10 SDH-15 5450 35 Girgaon station
11 SDH-16 5550 35
12 SDH-18 5650 35
5
Page 6
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
13 SDH-19 6940 35
14 SDH-20 6942 35
15 SDH-22 7050 35 Grant Road station
16 SDH-23 7120 35
17 SDH-24 7130 35
Cross- Passage
1 CPDH-1 35 Between CST to

2 CPDH-2 4269 35 Kalbadevi station
3 CPDH-3 35 Between CST to
Kalbadevi station
4 CPDH-4 4513 35
5 CPDH-5 35 Between Kalbadevi
6 CPDH-6 5144 35 to Girgaon station
7 CPDH-7 35 Between Girgaon to
8 CPDH-8 5790 35 Grant Road station
17 CPDH-17 35 Between Grant Road
to Mumbai Central
18 CPDH-18 7360 35 station
19 CPDH-19 35 Between Grant Road
to Mumbai Central
20 CPDH-20 7540 35 station
The location of drill holes given in above tables is tentative and may be changed as per site
condition & Design requirement.
6. TYPES OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

The Geotechnical Investigation includes the Exploratory drilling, Geophysical test,
laboratory & In-situ test, ground water level monitoring, data processing, interpretation of
data and subsurface information required for design purpose.
6
Page 7
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
6.1 Exploratory Drilling
Exploratory drilling will be carried out at the location of proposed metro stations, tunnel
alignment & cross passages up to minimum 5m below the underside of structure and
between the two tunnels and preferably outside of line of tunnels.
 SPT test will be carried out in boreholes as per IS Standards, the

disturbed/undisturbed soil samples will be collected from boreholes at specified
interval for lab testing.
 Rock core samples will be preserved in separate wooden core boxes from the
boreholes, marking drill length and to carry out core logging in attached format.
 Disturbed/undisturbed soil samples, rock core samples and ground water

samples will be collected for laboratory testing.
 Permeability testing of boreholes will be carried out as per IS codes.
6. 2 Laboratory testing
On completion of each borehole in field, the bore hole log will be submitted to Detailed
Design Consultant (DDC) to submit the schedule of laboratory & In-situ testing required
for design purpose on the basis of bore hole logs.
A programme/ Schedule of relevant laboratory tests of each borehole will be submitted

to investigation agency to carry out laboratory-testing.
Laboratory Tests on Collected Samples
Laboratory tests on collected soil & rock samples will be performed as per codal
provisions.
7
Page 8
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
i) Type of Laboratory tests on soil samples:
a) Natural Moisture Content (NMC)

b) Sieve and hydrometer analysis
c) Atterberg’s limits
d) Specific gravity
e) Bulk and dry density
f) Unconfined compressive strength
g) Triaxial test (unconsolidated undrained test)
ii) Laboratory tests on Rock core samples:
a) Bulk and dry density
b) Porosity
c) Water absorption
d) Specific gravity
e) Uniaxial compressive strength test & hardness (saturated, dry, with
Elastic modulus & Poisson Ratio)
f) Triaxial Shear Test
g) Point load test
h) Joint shear strength (Triaxial of Discontinuities)
i) Petrography Analysis
j) Tensile strength
k) Cherchar Abrasiveness Tests
iii) Chemical analysis of soil and water samples.
6. 3 In-situ testing
i). The following In-situ testing will be performed in soil formation
8
Page 9
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
a) In-situ permeability test (Falling head method).
b) Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
c) Pressuremeter Test
ii). The following In-situ testing will be performed in Rock formation
d) In-situ permeability test (Lugeon test).
e) Pressuremeter Test/ Dilatometer test
6.4 Geophysical Testing
a) Cross hole Seismic Survey
6.5 Ground water level
a) Stand pipe Piezometer for ground water measurement
7. LABORATORY & IN-SITU TEST PROGRAM
The numbers of laboratory & In-situ test per bore hole or per soil/ rock formation are
proposed in given below table. However the actual number of test per bore hole will be
finalized based on bore hole logs.
Table-3, Laboratory & In-situ test program
In-situ/ Field tests
S. No. Test No. of Tests
03 test per bore hole for station & 02 test per bore hole
1 SPT
for tunnel
9
Page 10
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
Permeability test
2 03 test per bore hole in soil formation (station)
(Variable head)
Permeability test
3 02 test per bore hole in Rock formation
(Packer)
01 test per soil formation & rock formation at each bore

4 Pressuremeter test
hole or 02 test per bore hole
01 test per Rock formation (Hard rock) or 02 per bore

5 Dilatometer test
hole in Hard rock formation
Geophysical Survey
6 (Cross Hole Seismic 01 per test per Station
test)
Laboratory tests in Soil
S. No. Test Proposed no./ Borehole

Grain Size Analysis
(including
1 hydrometer analysis) 01 test per soil formation or 03 test per bore hole
&
Atterberg limits
Specific Gravity, Bulk
& dry density, Unit
2 01 test per soil formation or 03 test per bore hole
Weight & Natural
Moisture content
Unconfined
3 Compressive 01 test per soil formation or 01 test per bore hole
Strength
Unconsolidated
undrained Triaxial
4 01 test per soil formation or 01 test per bore hole
compressive strength
test
Direct shear tests on
5 undisturbed soil 01 test per soil formation or 01 test per bore hole
samples
Chemical Analysis of
6 01 sample per bore hole
Water
Chemical Analysis of
7 01 sample per soil formation or 01sample per bore hole
Soils
Ground Water Level 01 location at each station and 06 location at tunnel
8
Measurement alignment
10
Page 11
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
Laboratory tests in Rock
S. No. Test Proposed no./ Borehole

Specific Gravity, Bulk
1 & dry Density, water 01 test per formation or 02 test per bore hole
absorption & Porosity
2 Tri-axial Shear tests 01 test per formation or 02 test per bore hole
Uniaxial
Compressive
Strength with
3 01 test per formation or 03 test per bore hole
measurement of
Elasticity Modulus &
Poisson Ratio
Point Load tests
(PLT)
Brazilian Tensile
Strength
Cherchar 01 test per formation or 01 test per bore hole at tunnel

6
Abrasiveness tests grade level
7 Joint shear Strength 01 test per formation or 01 test per bore hole
8 Petrography analysis 01 test per formation or 01 test per bore hole
Number of test per bore hole given in above table are tentative and will be finalised
based on analysis of bore hole logs.
11
Page 12
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
8.0 SPECIFICATION OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
8.1 Drilling in Overburden/ Soil
Boring in overburden soil shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of
IS:1892 and BS 5930. The boreholes shall have a minimum diameter of 100mm and be
suitably lined throughout.
The toe of the lining shall at no time be more than 1.0m above the level to which the
material has been removed from the borehole. Before taking any undisturbed sample or
making any in situ test, the lining shall be carried down to the bottom of the borehole.
No water shall be added while boring through cohesive soils and cohesion less soil
above the water table. While boring through cohesion less soil below water table, water
level in the casing shall always be maintained at or above the water table.
The cutting brought up by the auger, shell or the cutting shoe of the split-spoon or
undisturbed sampler shall be carefully examined and the soil description duly recorded
after performing field identification tests.
Ground water level for each borehole shall be checked during boring operation and shall
be recorded in bore log.
8.2 Drilling in Rock
Drilling through rock being a specialised work, every care shall be taken to notice and
record any small change during drilling. The time required to drill through a certain
depth, amount of core recovery, RQD, physical condition, length of pieces of core, joints,
colour of water residue, loss of water during drilling, hydraulic pressure exerted,
weathering, evidence of disturbance and other effects shall be carefully noticed and
entered in the drill log.
12
Page 13
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
Drilling into fresh/weathered rock strata shall be carried out using at least NX size
diamond coring bits and using double-tube core barrels in normal situations and triple-
tube core barrels in weak rocks, fault zones, shear zones, crush zones, folded rocks etc.
run by a hydraulic/mechanical feed machine. Use of triple tube core barrel helps
preventing mechanical breakage of rock cores due to rough handling.
Each drill run shall not exceed 1.5m in length and the core barrel shall be removed from
the boreholes as often as required to obtain the best possible core recovery. When any
recovery is less than 80% from a drill run, the next drill run shall be reduced to 50% of
the previous length.
Core shall be removed from the core barrel either by splitting the inner tube or by
extruding the core within the split inner liner. Core barrel shall be held horizontally whilst
the core is extruded in the same direction as it entered the barrel. Extrusion shall be
done without vibration and in a manner to prevent disturbance to the cores. Directly
applied water pressure may be used to remove the cores.
The time required for drilling through a certain depth, amount of core recovery, Rock
Quality Designation (RQD), physical condition, length of pieces of core, detail of joints,
colour of water residue, loss of water during drilling, hydraulic pressure, weathering,
evidence of disturbance and other effects shall be carefully noticed and entered in the
drilling log. Categorization of rock type (i.e. sound/hard/soft/weathered) would be made
by the ‘Geologist’ making use of these parameters and as per published literatures or
sound engineering practice.
For determination of ‘RQD’, double tube ‘N’ size core barrels with non-rotating inner
barrels will be used.
Photographs of rock core samples shall be taken.
For guidance IS: 5313 – “Guide for Core Drilling Observation” may be referred to. In the
exploration programme the Investigation Agency shall associate with the provisions of
IS: 1892 with experience in drilling in rock and associated tests. The data shall be
13
Page 14
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
presented in accordance with IS: 4464. Cores shall be stored properly in accordance
with IS: 4078. Permeability tests shall be carried out in the relevant strata using double
packers and using falling and constant head methods.
8.3 Disturbed Samples

Disturbed samples shall be taken from borehole cuttings, split spoon sampler and cutting
edge of undisturbed sampler for classification tests, (e.g. moisture content, Atterberg
Limits and particle size distribution). The samples shall be taken at 1.5m intervals or at
every identifiable change of strata, whichever is met earlier to give a reliable record of
the variations in the conditions of the soils. It is the Investigation Agency responsibility to
choose whatever appropriate samplers to be used so that enough samples will be
obtained in the least no of sampling operations. If required, the disturbed samples
should be sent to the laboratory for testing or handed over to the Client in airtight
container for the purpose of record.
8.4 Preservation of Disturbed Samples
Disturbed samples shall be preserved immediately after being recovered in a wide

mouth, airtight screw top, clear glass jar sealed with a non-shrinking microcrystalline
wax. Alternatively, sample may be placed in bags made of heavy gauge polythene
sheeting of an approved thickness. Each sample shall be placed in 2 layers of such
sheeting, each layer sealed to form an airtight bag.
8.5 Undisturbed Samples

Undisturbed samples in cohesive soils shall be taken at every identifiable change of
strata.
Sampling procedures and samples for recovering of undisturbed samples shall conform
to IS: 2132.
14
Page 15
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
8.6 Preservation of undisturbed Sample
About 40 mm of soil shall be removed from top and bottom of the sample tube and
preserved as a disturbed sample. The ends of the sample tube shall then be filled with a
non shrinking microcrystalline wax in suitable layers to a thickness of about 40 mm. The
voids at the ends shall then be completely filled with moist sand or other suitable fillers.
Sealing of the tube is completed by capping the tube with suitable tight filling caps and
the caps sealed with wax.
8.7 Samples collection and field test data
The Tunnel Alignment & underground stations area is expected to encountered different
type of rocks. Therefore, one sample per borehole per rock type will be collected for
testing of the rock properties. Sample collection, marking, packing and transportation of
samples from site to the laboratory and all in-situ tests shall be done in accordance with
the relevant codal provisions.
During the progress of fieldwork, Investigation Agency shall continuously furnish with
complete details of results of field tests as soon as the tests are completed. The
Investigation Agency shall also keep in continuous communication regarding further field
investigation, particularly if modifications in the earlier investigation program become
necessary on the basis of the test results.
8.8 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

Standard penetration test shall be conducted in all kinds of soils as per IS: 2131. The
split spoon sampler of 45mm is lowered and driven by hammering with 63.5kg hammer,
with a free fall of 75 cm for 15cm penetration at the bottom of hole. The number of blows
for each 15cm of penetration of the split spoon sampler shall be recorded. The blows
required to penetrate the initial 15 cm of the split spoon for seating the sampler is
ignored due to possible presence of loose materials or cutting from the drilling operation.
The cumulative number of blows required to penetrate the balance 30cm of the split
15
Page 16
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
spoon sampler is termed the SPT value or ‘N’ value. If the sampler is not fully penetrated
into soil after 100 blows, the test shall be terminated, after noting the scale of penetration
and shall be mentioned as refusal strata. Sufficient numbers of disturbed soil samples
shall be collected from split spoon sampler for sample identification and laboratory
testing.
8.9 Dispatch of Samples

Samples shall be despatched to the laboratory as soon as possible after being obtained
and shall not be allowed to accumulate on site. All the core boxes shall be stored in safe
places.
8.10 Pressure Meter Test

Pressure meter test shall be conducted in bore holes at desired depth to obtain in-situ
stress- strain characteristics and deformation modulus of soil/ rock layer. The location
and depth of the test in drill hole shall be confirmed on the basis of drill logs and as per
direction of DDC. All precaution shall be taken to ensure a smooth bore hole of required
diameter with minimum disturbance of surrounding soil/ rock. The equipment shall be
calibrated for pressure losses and volume or radius change before starting of test at
regular intervals. The specification for the equipment and other accessories, procedure
for conducting the test confirmed to IS 1892.
8.11 Dilatometer Test
Dilatometer test shall be conducted in Hard rock formation to obtain deformation

modulus of in-situ rock. The location and depth of the test in drill hole shall be confirmed
on the basis of drill logs and as per direction of DDC. The test hole shall be drilled with
utmost care to preserve their stability, bearing in mind that rock fragments inadvertently
wedged between the probe and drill hole wall can trap the dilatometer permanently. The
hole shall be 0.5 – 3.0mm larger than deflected diameter of probe. The specification for
the equipment and other accessories, procedure for conducting the test confirmed to IS
12955 (part-1).
16
Page 17
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
8.12 Stand pipe Piezometer
Stand Pipe Peizometers shall be installed at selected bore hole location along tunnel
alignment & stations to measure the current & seasonal fluctuations in ground water
level. The depth of bore hole shall be 5m deeper than the level at which groundwater
encountered. A 50mm diameter PVC pipe shall be connected to Peizometer that extend
up to ground level. The bore hole shall be back filled with sand to about 0.5 to 1m above
the present ground water level. A bentonite seal shall be placed to limit the possibility of
external water into hole. The annular space of borehole shall be filled back to ground
level and protected by the cover. Water level in piezometer shall be recorded two time
daily.
8.13 In- Situ Permeability Test
In- situ permeability test shall be conducted to determine the water percolation capacity
of overburden soil. This test shall be performed in bore hole at specified depths or each
soil layer as per direction of DDC.
a). Falling Head Method (In Soil)
This method shall be adopted for soil of low permeability and which can stand without
casing. The test section shall be sealed at the bottom of the bore hole and a packer at
the top of the test section. If hole can not stand as such then casing pipe with perforated
section in the strata to be tested should be used. Water shall be filled into pipe upto the
level marked just below the top of the pipe and water be allowed to drain in to test
section. The water level in pipe shall be recorded at regular intervals and confirmed in IS
5529-Part 1. The test shall be repeated till constant record of water level is achieved.
b). Water Pressure Test (Lugeon test In Rock)
Water pressure test shall be carried out in bore holes drilled in rock, the procedure
consists of injecting water into the bore hole and measuring the amount of water that can
be forced into the tested section of the hole within given time and at a given pressure.
Water loss during the test is expressed in term of lugeons as per IS 5529-Part 2.
17
Page 18
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
8.14 Cross Hole Seismic Survey

In this Geophysical method dynamic elastic properties are calculated from the velocities
of the P wave & S wave and the density of rock mass. The velocity distribution of rock
mass is measured between bore holes from the travel times of P & S waves and the
distances from the source to several receivers. Variations in velocity of P wave & S wave
can indicate the physical and mechanical properties and the degree of weathering,
fracturing and jointing of the rock mass between boreholes. The test will be conducted to
confirming IS 13372 (Part 2).
9. METHODOLOGY OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)
Detailed Methodology of Exploratory Drilling, Collection of Sampling, In-situ & Laboratory

testing, Geophysical testing, borehole logging & measurement of ground water level
enclosed in Annexure-2.
10. RELEVANT IS CODES & STANDARD
All the Investigation works will be carried out in accordance with the following Indian
Standard Codes & ISRM manuals.
Drilling Investigations:
 IS 5313 : 1980 Guide for core drilling observations

 IS 4464 : 1985 Code of practice for presentation of drilling
information and core description information investigation
 IS 9143 : 1980 Code of practice for indexing and storage of cores
 IS 4078 : 1980 Code of practice for indexing and storage of drill
cores
 IS 6935 : 1973 Method for determination of water level in a bore
hole.
18
Page 19
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
 BS 5930: Code of Practice for Site Investigations.
In-situ testing:
 IS 2131 : 1981 Method of Standard penetration test for soils

 IS 5529 : (Part 1) : 1985 In situ permeability testing in overburden
 IS 5529 : (Part 2) : 2006 In situ permeability testing in bed rock
 IS 1892 : Pressure meter Test
 IS 12955 (Part-1) : Dilatometer test in rocks
 IS 13372 (Part-2) : Cross hole Seismic Survey
Laboratory testing:
 IS 2720: Part 1:1983 Preparation of dry soil samples for various

tests.
 IS 2720: Part 2:1973 Determination of water content
 IS 2720: Part 3-1:1980 Determination of specific gravity, fine
grained soils.
 IS 2720: Part 3-2: 1980 Determination of specific gravity,
Fine, medium and coarse grained soils.
 IS 2720: Part 4:1985 Grain size analysis.
 IS 2720: Part 5: 1986 Determination of Liquid and Plastic limit
 IS 2720: Part 10: 1991 Determination of unconfined compressive
strength
 IS 2720 Part 11: 1993 Determination of the Shear Strength
Parameters of a specimen tested in unconsolidated, undrained
triaxial compression without the measurement of pore water
pressure.
 IS 2720: Part 12: 1981 Determination of shear strength
parameters of soil from consolidated undrained triaxial
compression test with measurement of pore water pressure
19
Page 20
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
 IS 2720: Part 13: 1986 Direct Shear Test

 IS 2720: Part 17: 1986 Laboratory Determination of Permeability
 IS 2720: Part 22: 1986 Determination of organic matter
 IS: 1498-1970 Classification and identification of soils for
general engineering purposes
 IS 3025: Part 32: Determination of Ph value
 IS 3025: Part 11: Determination of total soluble sulphate
 IS 3025: Part 24: Determination of chloride content
 IS 13030-1991: Bulk density & water absorption of rock
 IS 8764-1998: Point Load Strength of rock
 IS 9143: Unconfined compressive strength of rock.
11. MACHINERY, TOOLS & EQUIPMENT (Stage-I)
The Drilling rigs, Drilling Accessories and In-situ & Laboratory testing Equipment
Enclosed in Annexure-7.
12. DEFINITIONS
For purpose of this document the term:
GI : Geotechnical Investigation
SPT : Standard Penetration Test
UDS : Undisturbed samples
QA : Quality Assurance
DDC : Detailed Design Consultant
IS : Indian Standard
20
Page 21
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
BS : British Standard
PLT : Point Load Test
NMC : Natural Moisture Content
TDH : Tunnel Drillhole
SBH :Station Drill hole
CDH : Cross passage Drill hole
RQD : Rock Quality Designation
13. RESPONSIBILITIES
The proposed organization charts associated with this work are enclosed as Annexure-1
13.1 SITE MANAGER
 Implementation of this Procedure through approved Sub- Contractors.
 Co-ordination with Sub-Contractor to ensure continuous program of works

during execution.
 Safety of personnel, incident reporting and implementation of this Safety

Management Plan and Safety Management System.
 Ensuring that the works are carried out in accordance with approved /
standard procedures.
 Liaising with Client’s representative during the operations.
13.2 GEOTECHNICAL EXPERT (DESIGN)
 Review of the proposed procedure and active in interpretation of results.
21
Page 22
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
14. RISK MANAGEMENT
Safety Precaution
1. Barricading shall be erected around the working area so that un-

authorized persons shall not enter the premises.
2. Experienced drillers and assistants will be engaged.
3. PPE like safety helmets, safety shoes, safety jackets and hand gloves will
be used as per colour coding given in PPE’S standards for Mumbai Metro
Line-3 (MMRCL).
4. All routing parts shall be guarded.
5. Sufficient area lighting will be ensured.
6. Housekeeping shall be done on daily basis.
7. Authorized operator only shall be engaged for job.
The works will be carried out in a safe manner in compliance with the SHE manual,
Health & Environmental Management system. The care will be taken to minimize
disruption to the privacy of the occupants and their business operations during GI.
15. HANDLING OF EMERGENCIES
Emergency contact list is mentioned below.
Sl. No. Name Department/ Contact Number

Designation
22
Page 23
(HCC-MMS/TP/M/001)
16. ENCLOSURES
Annexure -1 Geotechnical Investigation Plan
Annexure -2 Methodology of GI
Annexure -3 Organization Chart
Annexure- 4 Field Records Formats.
Annexure -5 Investigation schedule
Annexure-6 Risk Assessment
Annexure-7 Machinery Tools & Equipments
23
Page 24
ANNEXURE-1
Geotechnical Investigation Plan

Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
FUGRO GEOTECH (I) PVT LTD
FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PVT LTD
ANNEXURE-02
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKS OF MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 PACKAGE

UGC-02 (STAGE-I)
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
Job No.: 16-1469
Page 1 of 1 PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN

Page 30
PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN
FOR
HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED

UGC-02 (STAGE-I)
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
Job No.: 16-1469

Page 31
ISSUE STATUS
001 05th Aug 2016 PEP AKS SKB SKB
Issue Date Description Prepared Checked Approved
Client : Geotechnical Contractor:

Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. Fugro Geotech (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Hincon House, 247 Park, LBS Marg, Plot No 51,
Vikhroli, Sector 6, Sanpada,
Mumbai, India. Navi Mumbai – 400 705,
400083 Maharashtra, India.

Page 32
1. INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. intends to carry out Geo-technical works for Mumbai Metro
Line 3 Package UGC02, Mumbai Maharashtra.
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. has commissioned Fugro Geotech (India) Pvt. Ltd (FGTL) to
carry out geotechnical investigation and provide necessary geological and geotechnical information to
ascertain the type of substrata / soil and their characteristics.
All equipment and work related facilities would be mobilized by road ways from our head office situated
at Navi Mumbai, Sanpada. Based on the various stages of the project and priorities, the proposed field
exploration program and laboratory testing is divided into the three phases.
Phase–1: Mobilization of field equipment for boring, sampling & field testing and survey equipment.
Phase – 2: Laboratory testing of soil samples received from site.
Phase – 3: Laboratory data analysis and factual report preparation.
This Project Execution Plan (PEP) includes our scope of services for Phase – 1 activities only,
consisting of the following items –
 Performing onshore boring with hydraulic rotary drilling rig and carrying out topographical survey.
 Making engineering geological observations and submitting documentation for geotechnical analysis
and reporting.
Project Objectives
The main objective of this geotechnical investigation (hereinafter referred to as the “WORK”) is to
provide necessary geological and geotechnical information for Mumbai Metro Line 3 Package UGC02,
Mumbai Maharashtra. Following are the key items that FUGRO will provide to achieve this objective –
 Mobilization of geotechnical drilling rig capable of boring through reclaimed/overburden material
and drilling to maximum depths as specified in technical specifications below existing grade. Drill
rig shall be capable of captivating disturbed and undisturbed sampling as per the contract condition
will be done.
 Mobilization of survey equipment for carrying out topographical survey at site and establishing
coordinates and RLs at all test locations with reference to nearby available reference co-ordinates
& RLs.
 Provision of all project specific documentation and plans
 Participation of crews in a suitable project HAZID

Page 33
 Supervision and management of all geotechnical site investigation

 Provision of detailed geotechnical boring logs as per IS code
 Performing all field in-situ tests as per specification.
 Preparation of samples and shipment to Fugro’s laboratory based at Sanpada, Navi Mumbai
 Completion of soil laboratory testing program, and
 Presentation of factual report.
Detailed work quantities are presented in, APPENDIX-A: Schedule of Works.
2. HEALTH AND SAFETY OBJECTIVES

The technical objective that is covered by this document is to gather site-specific geotechnical and
geological data to establish suitability of the site for the Mumbai Metro Line 3 Package UGC02, Mumbai
Maharashtra. Apart from this objective, the leading Health, Safety and Environment Management
(HSEM) objectives for this project will be as follow –
 To provide the Client with a clear statement of the methods by which Fugro Geotech (I) Pvt. Ltd.
shall provide the contracted services in a healthy and safe manner and in accordance with the
Client’s and statutory requirements
 To define the safety responsibilities, reporting systems and operational procedures that are to be
used by Fugro staff and subcontractors throughout the project
 To act as a Bridging Document between the various Fugro safety systems and the subcontractor
safety systems
 Ensure that all Fugro and contract personnel are suitably trained and motivated so as to operate on
the project without any impact on the local environment.
 To align Fugro’s efforts around Health, Safety & Environmental Management with those of the
Client.
The FGTL HSE Policy is attached as APPENDIX-B. These expectations are intended as the macro level
objectives for the project. Project objectives will be identified at the pre-mobilization meeting by all site
Personnel. The HSEM plans for the entire project will be developed and submitted as separate Fugro JS
A documents as follows –
1. JSA for mobilization of rig
2. JSA for geotechnical drilling operations
Please note that the HAZID report and risk register will also be integrated in the HSEM plan.
2.1 Health
 All personnel to remain fit and healthy throughout the project

 No personnel to suffer from sunburn, dehydration or heat stress and exposure

Page 34
 High degree of good housekeeping

 High level of hygiene
2.2 Safety
 Zero Incidents.
 Compliance with Fugro Golden Rules of Safety
 Compliance with all relevant statutory requirements
 All hazards and incidents reported immediately
 All employees and personnel empowered to stop work if encountering unsafe conditions
 Daily Toolbox Meetings that include a safety component
 Weekly HSE Safety Meeting
 Assessment of Hazards and Risks prior to commencing tasks
 Re-assessment of risk when conditions change
 Plant and equipment pre-start and maintenance inspections
 Site review for compliance
(No limit is placed on hazard or incident reporting as Fugro management wishes to encourage personnel
to report all occurrences of an unsafe nature.)
2.3 Environment
 Compliance with all relevant statutory requirements.

 Compliance with all permits’ requirements.
 Compliance with all Environmental Management Plan requirements.
 No environmental damage.
2.4 Incident Reporting
Incident reporting is required as part of the daily report. All HSE incidents will be reported in accordance
with the reporting requirements specified in the contract. All events shall be verbally reported
immediately to the on-site HCC representative within 24 hours of their occurrence. APPENDICES
– C & D elaborates FGTL’s Health Safety and Environment Management Plan and Emergency
Response Procedure.
3. QUALITY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES

3.1 Overview
Fugro maintains a Quality Management System (QMS), which has been certified by URS to comply with
ISO 9001:2008. Although this standard is to ensure the effectiveness of the QMS and customer
satisfaction, it is also the goal of FGTL to meet the aims of ISO 14001:2004 and OHSAS 18001:2007,

Page 35
which promotes a holistic approach to quality and the efficiency of the QMS. The Project Manager for
FGTL has been given the responsibility for the implementation and effectiveness of the contract quality
system, supported by FGTL’s QHSE Manager.
3.2 Quality Policy
The FGTL Quality Policy is attached as APPENDIX-E. This policy is enforced throughout the Company
and at the induction/re-induction of all the employees and contractors. The Quality Policy also states the
quality objectives that have been established to fulfil the policy and these objectives will be incorporated
into this PEP.
3.3 Objectives
Objectives Performance Indicator
1. Ensure the services are supplied in accordance All verification documents completed
with ISO 9001:2008
2. Provide a consistently high standard of service to Project review meetings to be conducted

HCC periodically.
Informal feedback system at management level

followed.
3. Ensure that the services meet the project Client specifications met or exceeded and signed off
specifications to the satisfaction of HCC by HCC would be undertaken.
4. Facilitate continuous improvement within the All issues would be recorded, followed-up and
project for all stakeholders. closed out.
Innovative ideas are encouraged and recorded in the

continual improvement process.
5. Ensure that staff follows the relevant practices Internal audits are conducted on a regular basis.
3.4 Quality Management
The key personnel responsible for the implementation of a quality system on this project will be as
follows:
3.4.1. Overall Project Head
Mr. Sunit Kumar Banerjee shall be the Project Manager (Mumbai Based) and will be overall responsible
for the execution and financial matters of the project.

Page 36
3.4.2. Project Manager
Mr. Sachin Chaudhry will be the designated Project Manager (Mumbai Based) and is responsible for the
overall co-ordination for the project. He shall liaise with the Operations Manager on quality matters and
reports directly to the Project Manager. Throughout the term of project, Project Manager will oversee the
planning, logistical requirements, field operations, co-ordinate transportation of samples from site to
laboratory, testing, report preparation and final submission of factual report to HCC.
3.4.3. Operations Co-ordinator
Mr. Sunil Dutt is FGTL’s designated Operations Co-ordinator (Mumbai Based) and in-charge of
Company’s Quality Assurance. He reports to the Project Manager and shall be responsible for ensuring
the maintenance of the QMS within the Division. For this project he shall be responsible for monitoring
and implementation of Quality Plan.
3.4.4. HSE Manager
Mr. Pranabesh Chattopadhyay is FGTL’s designated Senior HSE Advisor (Mumbai Based) and is in-
charge of Company’s Safety Management Assurance. He reports to the Managing Director and shall be
responsible for ensuring that safe HSE practices are strictly adhered on site. For this project he shall be
responsible for carrying out any internal safety and quality audits scheduled during the project.
3.4.5. Site HSE Officer
Site-in-charge will be FGTL nominated site HSE officer (HCC site Based). He supports Mumbai based
management in the maintenance and implementation of the Management System, assist during internal
audits, perform incident investigations, perform induction training for new personnel on site and work
closely together with FGTL Site-Incharge and FGTL Asst. Project Manager in complying with FGTL and
HCC QHSE requirements. He will oversee day to day safety practices and will directly report to Site-
Incharge.
3.4.6. Site-Incharge
Mr. Amol Patil is FGTL nominated Site-Incharge for this project and is single point of contact with HCC
nominated field representative. Various tasks (Boring, sample logging) that are included within the
geotechnical investigation services will be performed under his supervision. Various tasks will be
designated by him to his subordinate supervisor and other supporting officials, field technicians. The
Site-Incharge has the ultimate responsibility with regard to planning different stages of the fieldwork,
obtaining geotechnical field data at site and transfers same to Mumbai Head Office for processing of
data.

Page 37
3.4.7. Project Engineer
Mr. S.Ishwarkatti is FGTL designated Engineering Manager. He shall oversee timely receipt of borehole
logs, field test data sheets, prepare geotechnical borehole logs in Geodin, prepare laboratory test
schedules and submit for client approval, on receipt of approved laboratory schedule, pass on the same
to Site-In-charge for despatching rock samples to Navi Mumbai based laboratory. He shall be
responsible for collecting the lab data results, compile, perform engineering analysis and submit a
factual geotechnical report.
4. PROJECT METHODOLOGY AND RESOURCES

4.1 Project Management
For this project following are the primary contacts for the following services:
I. Contractual Matters:
Prime contacts: Mr. Sunit Kumar Banerjee
II. Site Operations and Logistics Matters:
Prime contacts: Mr. Sachin Chaudhry, Mr. Amol Patil
Cc: Mr. P. Madhurajan, Mr. Pranabesh Chattopadhyay.
III. Technical and Report Matters:
Prime contacts: Mr. S. Ishwarkatti
Cc: Mr. Sunit Kumar Banerjee, Mr. Sachin Chaudhry

4.2 Management Team
HCC Name Phone E-mail
FGTL Name Phone E-mail

Business Line Manager S. K. Banerjee +91-9987712710 s.banerjee@fugro.com
Project Manager Sachin Chaudhary +91-99875 46594 s.chaudhary@fugro.com
Operations Co-ordinator Sunil Dutt +91-9867026440 s.dutt@fugro.com
HSE Co-ordinator Pranabesh +91-95944 57462 p.chattopadhyay@fugro.com
Chattopadhyay
Project Engineer S. Ishwarkatti 022-27754012/13/15 s.ishwarkatti@fugro.com
Site-Incharge Amol Patil +91-8055433755 a.patil@fugro.com

Page 38
5. FIELD SERVICES
Execution
Site field geotechnical investigation includes various tasks including staking and borehole drilling. These
tasks will be performed by FGTL Personnel who are all experienced in their said designated jobs. The
following bullets briefly outline how FGTL will execute the field services for the completion of onsite
geotechnical investigation –
 The FGTL Site-Incharge plays a vital role at the site to ensure and confirm the smooth operations of
various field activities, and it is his role to ensure that all the field activities are performed in a safe
and timely manner.
 Site-In-charge will be designated onsite HSE Officer for the project, who shall conduct safety
meetings before commencement of work, prior to mobilization and will overlook the entire site
investigation work setup. Once all the procedures would be set in place and working, site supervisor
would be designated to see and follow up day to day safety practices and will directly report to Site-
In-charge.
 All personnel will receive safety induction training before starting of the work by HSE Officer.
 During the regular course of work all personnel will assemble at 7.00am at pre-arranged point to be
transported to the work site area. The site supervisor will ensure that adequate safe drinking water is
carried along to maintain hydration of working Personnel throughout the day.
 FGTL Site-Incharge will ensure that the JSA is read to all site Personnel and each task is reviewed
daily prior to commencement of work.
 All the personnel will assimilate on site at a designated place and will have toolbox safety meeting to
discuss safety updates, production and daily tasks.
 Field personnel dress in appropriate PPE for work being done and are transported out to relevant
working area using onsite vehicle.
 At approximately 13:00 hrs all site Personnel shall have a 60 min lunch break.
 At approximately 18:00 hrs or after sunset whichever is later work shall be discontinued for the day
and all Personnel shall return back to their accommodations.
 A daily electronic report detailing the time log of activities undertaken for the day, field investigation
logs, field tests, and any comments will be sent to Mumbai Head Office. The daily report will also
include Personnel on site, HSE meetings (including toolbox) held, reported incidents and weather
conditions. A copy of this report will also be submitted to HCC. site representative on the following
workday and would be signed off by both FGTL Site-Incharge and HCC representative.
 Mumbai HO will receive scanned field logs duly signed off by FGTL Site-In-charge and HCC
representative. Mumbai HO will review the data obtained from site and make a quality check
before submitting a final copy to HCC. FGTL will distribute field logs in “Geodin” format within 24 to
48 hours of receiving the field logs from site to HCC.
 Samples will be stored at site till the completion of borehole. They would be covered and care will be
taken so that the samples are not exposed to open air for loss of moisture. After the field borehole

Page 39
log is received from site, Project Engineer shall prepare a laboratory test schedule based on the
SOW and shall submit to HCC for approval. Once the approved copy is received the Project
Engineer shall send this to the Site-Incharge. Then as per the laboratory schedule the Site-Incharge
will pack and transport the required samples to Sanpada, Navi Mumbai Laboratory for testing.
 FGTL personnel will held weekly progress meetings onsite.
 Safety meetings will be conducted and documented during the course of the project.
 Geotechnical factual reports, will be submitted in the draft format for the client review by FGTL. The
final copies will be submitted by FGTL after receiving comments from HCC.
Additional details of the field procedures, methods, materials and equipment that will be employed in
conducting the required tasks are described in APPENDICES – F.
6. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND REPORTING

As the assigned laboratory data becomes available, engineering analysis will be performed and a final
geotechnical factual report with all the field and laboratory test results for the project shall be produced
and submitted to HCC.

Page 40
FUGRO GEOTECH (I) PVT. LTD.

PROJECT SPECIFIC METHOD STATEMENT
For

UGC-02 (STAGE-I)
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
Job No.: 16-1469
PROJECT SPECIFIC METHOD STATEMENT 1

Page 41
REPORT ISSUE STATUS
<00> 05th Aug 2016 Method Statement AKS SKB SKB


Page 42
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Fugro Geotech (I) Pvt. Ltd. has been contracted by Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. vide LOA
No. HCC ENG 132 B 02 167 dated 02nd August 2016, to provide services for Geotechnical
Investigation of Mumbai Metro Line-3 Package UGC-02 (Stage-I).
HCC has commissioned Fugro Geotech (I) Pvt. Ltd (FGTL) to carry out sub-surface investigation to
obtain relevant Geotechnical information from the site of proposed tunnels & stations. This
document pertains to the scope of work and method statement for the work as per the technical
specifications of the contract and specified codes.
The objectives of the geotechnical investigation are:
a. To delineate the subsurface strata through field investigations, which include drilling of boreholes,
field testing, litho-logging of bore holes, sampling & classification.
b. To evaluate the index and engineering properties of soil encountered through field and laboratory
testing.
c. To provide geotechnical report as per contract specifications
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

The detailed scope of works includes:
 Mobilization, shifting and setting of 2nos. Hydraulic Rotary drilling rig for drilling of 12nos. of
Boreholes up to 35m depth below the E.G.L. at the proposed site.
 Collection of Disturbed and Undisturbed soil samples in the boreholes based on the type of strata
encountered.
 Collection of Ground Water samples for chemical analysis.
 Carrying out Standard Penetration Tests in the boreholes.
 Field logging of the strata encountered through visual identification of lithology.
 Packing and labeling of samples and transporting them to laboratory.
 Laboratory testing of the selected soil samples as per specification and lab schedule to be issued
by Fugro and approved by client.
 Carrying out a total of 40nos. PMT (Menard-26 nos. and OYO-14 nos.), 24nos. Packer
Permeability test and 24nos. Falling head test at the locations directed.
 Installation of Piezometer Stand Pipe for monitoring ground level.
 To provide with individual borehole profiles, site plan and cross section profiles of boreholes.
 Preparation and submission of geotechnical report as per requirements in the specification
document.

Page 43
3.0 METHOD STATEMENT

Following are the work procedures as per Indian Standard codes.
3.1 Boring / Drilling
Aim
Boring in soil.
Objective
To obtain Disturbed and Undisturbed Soil Samples in soil.
Reference
IS: 1892
Apparatus
Rotary coring drill rig, flushing medium, conventional NWG double tube core barrels fitted with
Diamond tipped / TC core bits, drilling rods and casing.
Procedure:
Boring activity through soil and rock strata will be carried out with accordance to IS 1892. The
diameter of the Borehole shall be 100 mm. The Borehole will be advanced with 4” (HX) casing as a
guide casing up to required depth of the bore hole. However, if bed rock is encountered, drilling will
be undertaken by a conventional NWG double tube core barrel.
Rotary drilling is the most rapid method of advancing the boreholes in any type of soils / rock. This
method uses rotation of drill bits (tungsten/diamond), with the simultaneous application of pressure
to advance the borehole. Drilling mud may be used to stabilize the borehole walls. However, the
borehole walls, where weak, would be supported by temporary steel casing driven until a hard
stratum is encountered.
The drilling fluid, which is passed from the surface through hollow drill rods to the face of the bit,
cools and lubricates the bit; transports drill cuttings to the ground surface and, when using
particular types of drilling fluids, stabilize the borehole. In core drilling, an annular bit, fixed to the
bottom of the outer rotating tube of a core barrel, cuts a core, which is recovered within the
innermost tube of the core barrel assembly and brought to the surface for examination and testing.
The conventional double tube core barrel consists of two concentric barrels. The outer is rotated by
the drill rods and, at its lower end, carries the coring bit. The inner barrel is mounted on a swivel so
that it does not rotate during the drilling process. The core, cut by the coring bit, passes up into the
inner barrel and, at the end of the coring run; the core barrel assembly is lifted to the surface by
raising and removing each drill rod individually. The core is prevented from dropping out of the
core barrel by a core catcher made of spring steel and located just above the core bit. The drill fluid
flows down through the annulus between the inner and outer barrels on its way to the core bit. The
core itself is only in contact with the drill fluid as it passes through the core bit.
Undisturbed samples of cohesive soil will be obtained by a 76mm diameter thick walled sampling
tube.

Page 44
Core extrusion:
Core barrels will be held horizontally and the inner barrel containing the core will be removed
carefully and placed in a core box. The core depths will be marked on with indelible ink on wooden
markers and on the core box. Depth to the base of the hole prior to inserting the core barrel for
each drill run will be measured so that the presence and length of any core stub left in the hole
from the previous drill run can be identified.
It should be noted that in weak, weathered or fractured rocks and superficial deposits extrusion
can lead to core disturbance, however carefully it is done. The core will preferably be extruded in
the same direction as it entered the barrel.
Examination:
Examination and sampling of the cores will be done immediately after core recovery. Suitable
spacers and markers will be inserted between cores in core boxes to indicate start and end of each
core run where core samples are to be sent to laboratory for testing.
Description and classification of rocks:
Description of rock cores will be done with reference to IS: 4464. Lithology, Rock Quality
Designation (RQD), Total Core Recovery (TCR), Solid Core Recovery (SCR), weathering grade,
fracture index, drill water loss, fracture index and other structural details such as joint width,
discontinuity spacing and joint inclination will be reported.
3.2 Standard Penetration Tests

Introduction
This method covers the determination of the resistance to soils at the base of a borehole to the
penetration of the split-barrel sampler when driven dynamically in a standard manner, and
obtaining disturbed sample for identification purposes. The test is used mainly in sands.
Aim
To determine penetration resistance of soil.
Reference
IS: 2131
Principle
The basis of the test consists of dropping with a free fall a hammer of mass 63.5 kg on to a drive
head from a height of 760 mm. The number of such blows (N) necessary to achieve a penetration
of the split-barrel sampler of 300 mm (after its penetration under gravity and below the seating
drive) is regarded as the penetration resistance (N).
Apparatus
 Split barrel sampler assembly.
 Drive rods.
 Drive assembly: Free fall hammer weighing 63.5kg, a pick-up and release mechanism to
ensure that the hammer has a free fall of 76cm.
 Casing
 Other tools such as rope, screw jack etc.

Page 45
Procedure
The split spoon sampler resting on the bottom of borehole is allowed to sink under its own weight;
then the split spoon sampler is seated 15 cm with the blows of the hammer falling through 75 cm.
Thereafter, the split spoon sampler is further driven by 30 cm or 50 blows (except that driving shall
cease before the split spoon sampler is full). The number of blows required to affect each 75 mm
of penetration is recorded. The first 15 cm of drive may be considered to be seating drive. The total
blows required for penetration after seating drive is termed as penetration-resistance; if the split
spoon sampler is driven less than 45 cm (total), then the penetration resistance is for the last 30
cm of penetration. If less than 30 cm is penetrated, the number of blows and the depth penetrated
is recorded. Sample collection will start inside the borehole at 0.5m depth, followed by SPT at 1.5m
interval or at change of stratum whichever is earlier.
In case of sands unable to stand without casing, advancement of casing will be done by slowly
turning to cause minimum disturbance.
Refusal: The test will be stopped, unless directed otherwise by the Engineer-In-Charge, when the
total blow count is greater than 100 blows for 30 cm penetration.
The depth of Ground Water Table (GWT) shall be measured in all the BHs. Before taking the water
table readings, the water table in the Borehole shall be allowed to stabilize adequately. The water
table reading shall be recorded after 24hrs. of completion of Borehole.
3.3 Sampling
Reference: IS: 1892 and IS: 4078
1. Disturbed Samples:
The material from the cutting shoe of the thin walled sampler and from the split spoon sampler
of the standard penetration test will be treated as disturbed sample. All disturbed samples
collected, not less than 1.0kg will be placed in plastic bags without delay. All samples will be
labeled with sampling details, project name, location and depth.
2. Undisturbed Samples:
Undisturbed sampling will be done using thick walled tube wherever possible at 3m interval.
Before the thick walled sampler is taken, bottom of the hole will be cleared off loose
material/drill cuttings and where a casing is being used the sampler will be taken below the
bottom of the casing.
If an attempt to take the sample fails, the borehole will be cleaned out for the full depth to which
the sampler has penetrated and the recovered soil will be retrieved as disturbed sample. A
fresh attempt will then be made from the level of the base of the unsuccessful attempt.
The diameter of the sample would be 100 mm with length 450mm.The samples will be sealed
immediately using paraffin wax after taken out from borehole on both ends of the sampler/tube
to preserve their natural moisture content and in a manner as to prevent the sealant from
entering any voids in the sample. Space left between the end of the tube and the top of the
Page 46
wax will be tightly packed with sawdust or other suitable material, and a close fitting lid or
screwed cap will be placed on each end of the tube.
3. Ground water samples:

When groundwater samples are to be taken from a stratum that has been contacted while
advancing the borehole, all water-bearing strata from higher levels will first be sealed off by
borehole casings. As far as possible, all the water in the borehole will be removed by bailing or
pumping and the sample taken from water from seepage will be collected. About one litre will be
collected in clean bottle.
4. Handling and labeling of samples:

All samples will be protected from direct sunlight. All samples will be removed from the site of
the boreholes at the end of each day and will be stored in a structure free from disturbance. The
samples will be packed and transported to the testing laboratory in such a manner that
undisturbed samples arrive in an undisturbed state.
All samples will be labeled with a unique reference number immediately after being taken from
a borehole or excavation. For preserving samples for natural moisture content, they will be
sealed in airtight container or coated in wax at the same time. If the sample is of ground which
might be contaminated and contain hazardous substances, then the label will carry a warning to
that effect. The label will be marked with indelible ink and be sufficiently robust to withstand the
effect of its environment and the transport of the sample. Following details will be mentioned in
sample label:
1. Date of Sample collection
2. Job number
3. Client/Site details
4. Borehole number
5. Sample Depth
6. Type of Sample
7. Sample examiner sign
3.4 Menard Pressuremeter Test

Objectives:
To conduct Menard Pressuremeter Test for determining Pressuremeter Modulus and Limiting
Pressure at the yield point in accordance with the Procedure – A (The Equal Pressure
Increment Method) laid in ASTM D 4719.
Theory:
This test method provides a stress-strain response of the soil in situ. A pressuremeter modulus
and a limit pressure is obtained for use in geotechnical analysis and foundation design.

Page 47
The deformation characteristics derived are –
 Elastic characters: Menard pressuremeter modulus and non-linear characteristics of

deformability due to load level or strain level.
 Visco-elastic characters: Creep pressures, namely time process of deformation under
continuous load.
 Plastic characters: Menard limiting pressure at the yield point and behavior in deformation under
load thereafter.
Equipment
The Menard Pressuremeter set consists of:
1. MONITORING BOX – with devices to precisely regulate the pressure applied to the probe
and to read its volume changes with pressure increments and time.
2. GAS CYLINDER – providing the pressure source (Nitrogen is preferred gas to be used)
3. TRIPOD STAND – supporting the monitoring box.
4. THE PLASTIC TUBING – coaxial, which connects the probe to the monitoring box.
5. THE 3 – CELL PROBE – Two types of Probe are available with different dia: 1) 60 mm (Bx)
and 2) 44 mm (Ax) which includes a central measuring cell, filled with water. Depending on the
nature of the strata available, selection of probe will be made. Its volume changes are read on
the monitoring box in volume measuring meter. The 60mm probe is totally protected by a
rubber cover and 44mm probe is placed within the slotted tube, that has a series of longitudinal
slots (usually six) cut through it to allow for lateral expansion, sometimes is used as a
protective housing when the probe is driven, vibrodriven, or pushed into deposits that cannot
be prevented from caving by drilling mud alone. which is inflated by the gas to form the 2 guard
cells. Pressure applied to the borehole walls are kept constant along the 3 cells through the
differential pressure regulator to ensure a true cylindrical deformation along the measuring cell.
Calibration
a) Volume losses: Calibration for volume losses is done by inserting the probe vertically into
close fitting, thick walled, 66mm inner diameter steel tube for Bx probe. The probe is inflated
to seat against the sides of the tube, and from this point on, as the pressure in the system is
increased, it is assumed that the probe cannot inflate any further so that any volume change
which is measured is due to losses inherent in the pressuremeter.
b) Pressure losses: Calibrations for membrane resistance is performed by inflating the probe,
completely exposed to the atmosphere, with the probe placed at the level of the pressure
gauge. The pressures are applied in 10-kPa increments volume change readings are
measured after 1-min elapsed time till maximum probe volume is reached. Reading are
plotted on a pressure versus volume graph. The obtained curve is the pressure calibration
curve.
Page 48
Testing
Before the probe is positioned in the hole for testing, an accurate determination of the 0 volume
reading (V0) is done in the un-inflated probe at atmospheric pressure by clearing all circuits and
adjusting all gauges of the instrument to 0 while the probe is at atmospheric pressure. The
volume circuit is then closed to prevent any further change in the volume of the measuring
circuit. The probe is then lowered to the test depth in this condition. The test depth is
determined as the depth of the midpoint of the probe. Once the probe is placed in test position
then apply the pressure on the control unit in about equal increments, until the expansion of the
probe during one load increment exceeds about 1/4th of V0 (typically 200 cm3 for a 800-cm3
probe). Generally, 25, 50, 100, or 200-kPa pressures are selected for testing soils. Too small
steps results in an excessively long test, too large steps yields results with inadequate
accuracy. The volumetric observations are then recorded at intervals of 15sec; 30sec and 1
min. after the pressure increments have been applied.
Once the test has reached to its maximum threshold level it is then terminated by deflating the
probe to its original volume and the probe is removed from the hole. The borehole is then
advanced as mentioned above to the next test depth to continue with testing.
Fig-1: Ideal Shape of the Pressure meter Corrected Curve

Test Calculation and Presentation
The Menard Pressuremeter Modulus is determined from the linear, pseudo-elastic deformation
zone of the stress-strain curve:
Where, Ep = pressuremeter modulus, kPa,
γ = Poisson ratio,
V0 = volume of the measuring portion of the uninflated probe at 0 volume reading at ground

Page 49
surface, cm3,
V = corrected volume reading of the measuring portion of the probe,
ΔP = corrected pressure increase in the center part of the straight line portion of the
Pressure-volume curve
ΔV = corrected volume increase in the center part of the straight line portion of the pressure-
volume curve, corresponding to ΔP pressure increase, and
Vm = corrected volume reading in the center portion of the ΔV volume increase.
V0 + V = current volume of inflated probe.
The conventional limit pressure is determined where the probe volume reaches twice the original
soil cavity volume, defined as the volume V0 + Vi, the volume reading at twice the original soil
cavity volume is (V0 + 2Vi).
3.5 Pressure meter Test In Rocks

Objective:
To conduct an in-situ high pressure dilatometer test also known as pressure meter test within a
borehole to assess the elastic properties of the rock mass. This method statement is prepared in
accordance with different codes such as ISRM, IS: 12955 (Part-2), JGS 3531 & manufacturer’s
manual.
Principle of Operation:
The high pressure dilatometer test method is classified as direct displacement measuring
method, wherein, the pressure via a borehole probe (Sonde) is exerted to the walls of borehole
and the consequent deformation in radial direction is measured. The resultant curve of increase
in radius verses applied pressures is plotted to derive the modulus of elasticity (E).
Pressure meter test provides the analysis of the stress – deformation diagrams at various depths
for the evaluation of Modulus of Elasticity and Shear Modulus.
Equipment:
HQ Sonde (Probe) – consisting of rubber membrane stretched over a core.
Elastometer 2 – Digital Indicator.
High pressure (0 – 200 bar) water pump.
Calibration cylinder, calibration ring, control cable, water pipe and accessories.

Page 50
Test Procedure
Selection of test locations
Drill hole locations and depths are selected taking into account the anticipated rock quality
variations, depths of weathering and the nature of the design calculations for which the test data
are needed.
Drilling and preparation

Borehole with a diameter of 76mm is drilled with a Nx core barrel. Drill cores are fully logged to
record core recovery, fracture frequency, rock characteristics, weathering and structural features
such as schistosity, foliation, bedding and joints.
Calibration
The complete dilatometer equipment is thoroughly checked and calibrated before each test
series. With the probe inserted in the calibration cylinder, the full test pressure is applied and a
check is made for pressure maintenance and leakage. The pressure is then released and
increased incrementally through the range to be used in actual testing.
Testing
The displacement measuring range of the Elastmeter is 10mm in the maximum increase of the
radius and can maximum pressure that can be applied is 20MPa. Once the sonde is lowered
inside the borehole at the pre-determined testing depth, the pressure increment is made within a
range of 0.50 to 1.00MPa. Each increment is held constant for 60 sec and the readings of the
pressure in MPa and the radius in mm is recorded at every 15 sec, 30 sec and 60 sec interval.
The pressure decrement in unload cycles is kept similar in magnitude to the increments used in
the loading stages. Thus, pressure is increased in not less than five approximately equal
increments to the maximum value, which is to be as high as possible but not greater than the
safe operating pressure of the test equipment, taking into consideration the smoothness and
diameter of the drillhole at the test depth. Once the test is complete, the pressure is slowly
released and probe is allowed to contract to its original size and withdrawn from the borehole to
repeat the above steps for next test depth.

Page 51
Field Test Curve
Pressuremeter Test
6
4
Pressure (Mpa)
0
-2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Displacement (mm)
60 sec 30 sec 0 sec
Where:
A – B: inflating the membrane.
B – C: elastic period.
C – D: yield period.
A – D: initial loading.
D – E: first unloading.
E – F: second loading.
F – G: second unloading.
G – H: third loading.
H – I: third unloading.
Observations and Calculations:

The Ground Coefficient (K) and the Elasticity Modulus (E) are determined from the linear,
pseudo-elastic deformation zone of the load deformation curve as follows:
K = P/R E = (1+) * Rav * K
Where, K=Ground Coefficient (MN/m 2) Where, E=Elasticity Modulus (MPa)
P=Pressure interval (MPa) = Poisson’s Ratio
R=Radius interval (m) Ra=Intermediate Radius (m)
The Elasticity Modulus, E, is generally measured for both the initial and reload curves as the
Initial Modulus, Ei, and the Reload Modulus, Er, respectively. Ei is typically considerably less
than Er,

Page 52
primarily as a result of the relaxation that occurs in the period between drilling of hole and
commencement of the pressure meter test. If the difference were entirely due to stress
relaxation, Er value would be considered more representative of the in-situ rock mass stiffness
(E) at the test location. However, the initial deformation may also include a component
attributable to virgin compression, in which case a representative E value would be between Ei
and Er.
Reporting
The final report consist of all the below mentioned details -
1. Contract name and number, borehole number, depth of the test pocket.
2. Field borehole log, groundwater table, details of casing and cementation if any.
3. Calibration coefficients (k and s/π) and graphs used to convert the test data.
4. A plot of total pressure against radius displacement.
Preliminary assessment of parameters G and E at the initial loading and both the unload-reload
stages.
3.6 Packer Permeability Test

Objective:
To determine the field permeability of the bedrock
Theory:
The field permeability is required to supplement the drilling data in rock strata to account for loss
of water into fissures, joints and cracks etc.
The coefficient of permeability is evaluated on the basis of Darcy’s law which states that the rate
of flow through a porous media is proportional to the hydraulic gradient.

The method in which ‘pumping in’ test under pressure, measures the permeability in to the test
section of bedrock in drill holes, is generally used. The tests include single and double packers.
Equipment:
Drilling equipment
Water level measurement meter
Miscellaneous equipment as stop watch, graduate cylinder, pressure gauge, bucket
Pneumatic, mechanical or suitable packers
Pump
Procedure:
Drill a hole up to the level of the test depth and clean the hole
Insert the packer up to the desired test depth water will be supplied through pipes into the packer
and through the holes in the center of the packer, water will be applied to the wall for the 10 mins
duration for the particular pressure
Pressure increments will be changed periodically.

Page 53
Observations:
The permeability is obtained by Lugeon value, where,
Lugeon value = water taken in test (l/min) / Test Pressure (MPa)
2Q
K
(Cs  4)r (Tu  H  A)
K = Coefficient of permeability in m/s
Q = Steady flow into well in m3/s
Cs = Conductivity coefficient
r = radius of test hole m
Tu = U-D+H
U = thickness of material, m
D = distance from ground surface, m
H= effective head, m
Apply suitable correction for head loss due to friction in the pipe
3.7 Permeability test (Falling Head Method)

Objective:
To determine the field permeability of the subsurface strata
Theory:
The field permeability is required for several engineering problems, such as design of cut off wall
for earth dam, calculation of pumping capacity for dewatering excavations and determination of
aquifer constants of subsurface strata. The coefficient of permeability is evaluated on the basis
of Darcy’s law which states that the rate of flow through a porous media is proportional to the
hydraulic gradient. The method in which the water level in the test hole is allowed to fall and the
equivalent permeability is computed from the data of rate of fall of the water level.
Equipment:
Drilling or boring set or auger
Driving pipe casing or blind pipe
Water level measurement
Miscellaneous equipment as stop watch,
Procedure:
Drill a hole up to the level of the test depth and clean the hole
Insert the packer up to the desired test depth
Fill the water pipe up to the top and record the rate of fall of water

Page 54
Observations:
The permeability by falling head method is obtained by:
K = (d2/8L) loge [(L/r)(loge(h1/h2)/(t2-t1)]
where,
K = coefficient of permeability
d = diameter of intake pipe
L = length of test zone
h1 = head of water at time t1
h2 = head of water at time t2
r = radius of hole
3.8 CROSS HOLE SEISMIC TEST

INTRODUCTION
Cross Hole Seismic Test (CHST) is one of the important tests for the top 30-50m of the
subsurface strata. The test is routinely carried out by the developed countries for geotechnical
investigations at potential earthquake prone hazard sites, construction of tall building sites,
construction sites for power projects especially nuclear, at sites of important structures where the
rock is very deep etc.
PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION AND EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
The general principle of the CHST is to establish the compressional (P-wave) and shear wave (S-wave)
velocities of the soil and rock layers as encountered at selected depths. The waves are generated in the
“source” borehole by using a borehole seismic
source and the same are detected by the tri-axial
geophone(s) in “receiver” borehole(s) drilled at
known distance from the source borehole. The
wave fronts detected by the geophone(s) are
recorded on a multi channel signal enhancement
seismograph. The travel time of the generated P
and S waves is interpreted from the wave front
recorded by a seismograph. Knowing the distance
between the “source” and the “receiver” borehole
and the time of arrival of seismic waves from the
seismograph record, P and S wave velocities are
calculated at the selected depths.
The geometric arrangement of one “source” and two “receiver” holes in one line spaced 3 – 5m apart as
shown in Figure comprises one set of CHST,
The Cross-Hole Seismic Test (CHST) is generally performed to determine the compressional and shear wave
velocity of strata with depth at a proposed site. The test is normally conducted in general accordance with

Page 55
ASTM D- 4428.
EQUIPMENT DETAILS
The test equipment consists of a signal enhancement Seismograph (Geode) of M/s Geometrics, USA, with a
notebook PC as the readout unit, a reversible type pneumatically operated hammer as seismic energy source,
borehole geophone (seven-directions) as detectors, batteries, cables etc The hammer and the geophones are
fitted with inflatable rubber tubes allowing them to be fixed at the desired depth in the borehole. The signal
enhancement seismograph is capable of storing and stacking the data; the arrival times of the P and S waves
are picked up using a suitable software using the notebook PC.
TEST PROCEDURE
Selection of test locations
a) Drillhole locations and depths are selected taking into

account the anticipated soil quality variations, and the nature
of the design calculations for which the test data are needed.
b) Within each borehole, the test is spaced at 1.5m interval.
Drilling and preparation
PVC casings are inserted after the source borehole is drilled. Normally two receiver boreholes of 35m depth
are drilled at 3-5m spacing from the source borehole. After coring, the borehole diameters are enlarged by
reaming to facilitate insertion of 75mm diameter heavy duty PVC casings with bottom plugs in them. The
annular space between the borehole walls and the casing is grouted with slurry of bentonite and cement.

Page 56
The P and S wave measurements will be made in the boreholes at every 1.5m depth up to maximum depth of
35m commencing from the existing ground level. The geophone and source cables will be marked at every
1.0 m length interval to ensure that the geophone and the hammer are at the same test depth. The hammer
and the geophones are then lowered to the test depth. The hammer will be held against the borehole wall at a
particular depth by inflating the rubber tubes provided at the side of the hammer using an air pressure pump,
from the surface. Similarly, the geophones are lowered in the receiver holes to the same depth and held
against the borehole wall in a similar manner. The shear wave arrivals will be generated by striking the
borehole hammer once in upward direction by pulling up the strike rod with the help of a string and then in the
down ward direction by allowing the rod to fall under its own weight.
The signal enhancement seismograph which is capable of improving the signal to noise ratio by
adding or “stacking” several strike signals will be achieved by repeating the process described
above, striking at least three to five times and then stacking the signal.
CALCULATION AND PRESENTATION

(S wave velocities (km/sec.)
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
0.00
Initial calculations for determining the P and S waves will be made at 1.50
(4m) (8m)
3.00
the site. The tests will be repeated a number of time to ensure the 4.50
correct arrival of seismic waves corresponding to the strata, at the 6.00
7.50
depth. The same procedure will be followed at every test depth. 9.00
Depth (m)
10.50
Subsequently, the traces will be examined once again in the office to 12.00
13.50
ensure proper identification of the arrival of S waves. 15.00
16.50
The P and S wave arrivals so registered in the upward and 18.00
19.50
downward directions will be then overlapped by using computer 21.00
software and the horizontally polarized shear wave arrival time pick.
3.9 Piezometer Stand Pipe

 In order to monitor the ground level and its temperature, the piezometer stand pipe shall be
Prepared for two locations. Their depth shall be 20m from the ground surface.
 In each boring, the water levels should be recorded daily before resuming drilling operations
in the morning.
 Groundwater sample is to be collected as requested by the Client.
 During the boring operations, water levels records are to be reported.
Installation and Monitoring of Standpipe Piezometers
 Standpipe piezometers will be installed in two dedicated boreholes selected by the Client’s
Representative. These will consist of 50mm minimum internal diameter PVC piping, the lower
1.0m to 1.5m of which has been perforated or slotted and wrapped in a filter fabric sack.

Page 57
 Tentative plan is to extend PVC pipe of suitable thickness to 5.0m to 6.0m below Ground
water Level. The internal bore of the pipe will be smooth, particularly at joints. An end cap will
be provided at the bottom of the pipe.
 The piezometer will be installed prior to withdrawal of any temporary casing in the borehole.
Prior to installation of the piezometer, the hole will be flushed with clean water. The
piezometer will be installed to rest on the bottom of the Borehole. Backfilling around the
piezometer will consist of graded silica sand with a 0.5mm – 2mm grading followed by a
bentonite pellets / balls.
 The rest of the arrangement above ground will be as shown in the schematic diagram
presented below. A PCC pedestal placed around the pipe on ground will be inscribed with the
borehole number, depth & date of drilling.

Page 58
4.0 LABORATORY TEST METHOD STATEMENT
WATER CONTENT DETERMINATION
GENERAL
The water (moisture) content is defined as the ratio of the weight of water to the weight of dry
soil. Water content determinations are normally performed in accordance with the procedures of
IS: 2720 (Part 2). A brief outline of the test procedure is presented here.
TEST PROCEDURE
The moisture content is determined by weighing a suitable quantity of wet soil. The soil is then
dried in an oven, typically for a period of at least 24 hours, at a temperature of 110±5°C. Some
soils, especially those containing gypsum or calcite, are dried at lower temperatures to constant
weight in order to avoid errors due to loss of water of crystallization, or cementation of the
sample if it is to be used subsequently in another test. The resulting dry soil is re-weighed in
order to obtain the weight of water lost from the sample. The moisture content, as defined above,
is then determined.
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
Individual results are presented in tabular form and may also be presented graphically. Unless
agreed otherwise with the customer, the result is presented as a percentage to the nearest 0.1%
below 10% and to the nearest 1% above.
ACCURACY OF MEASUREMENTS
Temperature ± 5°C
Weight ± 0.01 gms
REFERENCE
IS-2720: Part 2
BULK AND DRY DENSITY DETERMINATION
GENERAL
Bulk density is defined as the mass of soil per unit volume and is normally expressed in units of
Megagram per cubic metre (Mg/m³). Dry density is defined as the mass of dry soil per unit
volume. A brief outline of the test procedure is presented here.
TEST PROCEDURE
The bulk density of a sample is determined by weighing a known volume of wet soil. A regular
shaped specimen, usually a right-cylinder, is carefully prepared and its dimensions (eg. length
and diameter) measured in several locations. These measurements are averaged, then used to
calculate the volume (i.e. simply πd2h / 4 in the case of a cylinder).

Page 59

In very soft samples that tend to slump under their own weight, a mould may be used to
constrain the specimen: the internal dimensions of the mould are substituted for the measured
dimensions of the test specimen in the volume calculation.
LABORATORY TEST METHOD STATEMENT

The dry density is determined by determining the water content of the soil. The measured bulk
density from above is then corrected for the contribution from water to obtain the dry density.
Individual results are presented in a tabular form.
Results may be converted to and presented as unit weights by multiplying the bulk or dry density
value by the acceleration due to gravity (ie 9.81m/s 2 in the UK) with the resulting values being
expressed in kN / m 3.
Dimensions ± 0.01 mm
Temperature ±1oC
Weight ± 0.01 gms
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
Particle size distribution tests are normally performed in accordance with the procedures of IS-
2720: Part 4. A brief outline of the test procedures is presented below.
TEST PROCEDURES
(i) Dry Sieving - Dry sieving is normally performed on clean soils containing only a small
proportion of fine-grained soil. The soil specimen is dried in a thermostatically controlled oven to
constant weight before being placed in a mortar and tamped using a rubber pestle, to ensure soil
particles are not binding together. The soil is then passed through standard calibrated IS sieves,
usually using a mechanical shaker. Care is taken to ensure that each sieve is not overloaded
with sample, and that sieving is complete. The mass of dry soil retained on each sieve is
determined.
(ii) Wet Sieving - Wet sieving is normally performed on soils with any appreciable proportion of
fine grained soils and is the preferred method for most soils. Prior to determination of the particle
size distribution, a weighed quantity of soil is dispersed with a solution of sodium
hexametaphosphate before being washed through a 63-micron sieve. Alternative dispersants
may need to be used on certain samples. It is important that the wet sieving and washing
processes are performed gently, as fragile solids such as chalk gravel and pelloidal clays can be
destroyed otherwise. The percentage by weight of the various particle sizes in excess of 75
microns is then determined by dry sieving as above. The percentage of fines is determined by
difference.

Page 60
(iii) Hydrometer Method - This method is not applicable, if less than 10% of the material passes
63 micron BS Sieve. For this methods the soil sample is suspended in a solution of 33g/L
sodium hexametaphosphate in water. Testing is performed in a thermostatically controlled water
bath (25° ± 0.5°). The amount of soil remaining in the soil/water suspension is determined at
various times and related to soil particle size by means of Stoke's Law.
DATA PRESENTATION
Particle size distribution, expressed in terms of percentage of soil by weight passing a particular
sieve size, is presented for individual tests in graphical format.
Weight ± 0.01g for dry/wet sieving
± 0.005g Hydrometer
REFERENCES
IS-2720: Part 4
ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION USING THE CONE PENETROMETER

METHOD AND CASAGRANDE FOR LIQUID LIMIT ASSESSMENT
GENERAL
Atterberg Limits tests are performed to determine the liquid and plastic limits, and hence the
plasticity index of a cohesive soil. The tests are performed in accordance with the procedures of
IS-2720: Part 5 on the soil fraction passing a 425μm sieve. A brief outline of the test procedure is
presented below.
Note that we also routinely run liquid limit tests using the “Casagrande” method and currently
hold both BS and ASTM Casagrande equipment.
TEST PROCEDURE
(i) Liquid Limit – By Casagrande Method
The Casagrande apparatus consist of a base carrying a sliding carriage assembly to which a cup
is hinged. The cup shall be suspended in such a way that it may be raised and dropped through
a height of 10mm with help of a led screw provided at back of the sliding carriage. In case of
clayey soils, the soil paste shall be left to stand for sufficient time (24 hours) so as to ensure
uniform distribution of moisture throughout the soil mass. The test should proceed from the drier
to the wetter condition of the soil. The pat of soil is placed in a standard cup and cut by a groove
of standard dimensions will flow together at the base of the groove, when the cup is subjected to
25 standard shocks. The representative slice of soil approximately the width of the spatula,
extending from about edge to edge of the soil cake at right angle to groove and including that
portion in which soil flowed together, shall be taken in a suitable container and its moisture
content expressed in percentage. The four-point liquid limit test is usually carried out. A flow

Page 61
curve should be plotted on semi-logarithmic graph representing water content on the arithmetical
scale and the number of drops on the logarithmic scale. The moisture content corresponding to
25 drops as read from the curve should be rounded to nearest whole number and is reported as
the liquid limit of the soil.
By Cone Penetrometer Method
The 'Cone Penetrometer Apparatus' is a variant of the fall-cone and consists of a cone with a
smooth polished surface and angle of 30° ± 1/2°. The weight of the cone, together with its
associated shaft is 80g ± 0.5g. A support assembly with an automatic cone release mechanism
and cone height adjustment mechanism is used to hold the cone vertically. The angle and weight
of the cone are calibrated at regular intervals, and the sharpness of the cone tip is checked daily.
Distilled water is added and thoroughly mixed with the soil to be tested to produce a
homogeneous paste. The paste is then placed in a cup with a diameter of at least 55mm and a
depth of at least 40mm. The surface of the soil is smoothed off level and parallel to the base.
The support assembly is used to position the tip of the cone so that it is just touching the top
surface of the soil, and the automatic tripping mechanism is released. The cone is allowed to
penetrate into the soil for a period of 5 (± 1) s, then the cone is locked off to stop further
movement and the penetration is recorded. The cup is refilled and the test repeated. The two
recorded penetrations need to be within 0.5mm of each other, otherwise a third test is
performed. If the three test vary by more than 1mm the test is repeated.
Further tests are conducted, at varying water contents, in order to produce a series of cone
penetrations (usually 4) in the range 15mm to 25mm. The resulting cone penetrations are plotted
verses the water content of the test specimens. The Liquid Limit (WL) is read off the graph, being
the water content at which the line of best fit through the test points crosses 20mm penetration.
The Casagrande apparatus consist of a base carrying a sliding carriage assembly to which a cup
is hinged.
The cup shall be suspended in such a way that it may be raised and dropped through a height of
10mm with help of a led screw provided at back of the sliding carriage. In case of clayey soils,
the soil paste shall be left to stand for sufficient time (24 hours) so as to ensure uniform
distribution of moisture throughout the soil mass. The test should proceed from the drier to the
wetter condition of the soil. The pat of soil is placed in a standard cup and cut by a groove of
standard dimensions will flow together at the base of the groove, when the cup is subjected to 25
standard shocks. The representative slice of soil approximately the width of the spatula,
extending from about edge to edge of the soil cake at right angle to groove and including that
portion in which soil flowed together, shall be taken in a suitable container and its moisture
content expressed in percentage. The four-point liquid limit test is usually carried out.
A flow curve should be plotted on semi-logarithmic graph representing water content on the
arithmetical scale & the number of drops on the logarithmic scale. The moisture content
corresponding to 25 drops as read from the curve should be rounded to nearest whole number
and is reported as the liquid limit of the soil.
Page 62
(ii) Plastic Limit - The plastic limit is determined by allowing a portion of approximately twenty
grams of the soil used for the liquid limit test to dry partially. When the soil has dried sufficiently
to be workable by hand, it is kneaded into a ball until cracks appear on the surface. The soil is
then rolled into threads approximately three millimeters in diameter using even pressure. If the
threads remain intact at 3mm diameter, the specimen is rolled back into a ball and kneaded
some more in order that heat from the hands dries it a little more each time. The thread rolling is
then repeated.
Once both longitudinal and radial cracks appear in the 3mm threads, the crumbled soil fragments
are placed into weighed tins and are dried. Care needs to be taken to ensure that the cracking is
only occurring as the threads reduce to 3mm diameter: if the cracking appears while the threads
are significantly the larger, the sample is already too dry. The accuracy of this test is highly
dependent on the skill and experience of the person performing it.
The Plastic Limit (WP) is defined as the moisture content at which the threads of soil three
millimeters in diameter crumble.
(iii) Plasticity Index – the Plasticity Index (IP) is equal to the value of the liquid limit minus that of
the plastic limit (i.e. IP = WL - WP).
DATA PRESENTATION
Result of Atterberg Limits determinations are presented both in tabular form.
Weight ± 0.01g.
REFERENCE
IS-2720: Part 5
Direct shear test

GENERAL
This test deals with determination of shear strength of soil with maximum particle size of
4.75mm. Depending upon the application of shear load, the direct shear test is of two types,
controlled stress and controlled strain. Controlled strain is simpler therefore recommended.
Specimen Preparation
For undisturbed specimens required size should be prepared in accordance with IS : 2720(Part
I)-1983. For remoulded soils it can be compacted to the required density and moisture
content.sample extracted and then trimmed to required size. Aaaaaalternatively the soil may
be compacted to the required density and moisture content directly into the shear box after
fixing the two halves of the shear box together by means of the fixing screws.
Cohesionless soils may be tampered in the shear box itself with the base plate and grid pate or
porous stone as required in place at the bottom of the box.

Page 63

The cut specimen should be weighted and trimmings used to obtain moisture content.
Procedure
The shear box with the specimen, Plain grid plate over the base plate at the bottom of the
specimen and plain grid plate at the top of the specimen should be fitted into position. Load and
deformation measuring devices are fitted. Three specimens with different normal stress is
tested in general the normal stresses are 50, 100 and 150 kPa. The normal stress is then
applied on the sample and then the sample is sheared with a constant strain. Readings in a
uniform interval is measured. Following the above procedure three samples with different
normal loads are tested. Direct shear test is generally conducted on cohesion less samples
PRESENTATION OF DATA
Data is presented in accordance with the procedures given in IS:2720 (Part 13)-1986.
Weight 0.1grams
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
GENERAL
This test deals with the determination of unconfined compressive strength of soils. The maximum
load that can be transmitted to the sub-soil by a foundation depends upon the resistance of the
underlying soil or rock to shearing deformation or compressibility. The shearing strength is
investigated by mean of compression test in which an axial load is applied to the specimen and
increased until failure occurs.
The specimen shall have minimum diameter of 38mm and largest particle should be smaller than
1/8 of specimen diameter. Height to diameter ratio shall be 2. Measurement shall be made with
Vernier calipers or any other suitable measuring device to the nearest 0.1 mm.
For undisturbed specimen, sample should be prepared from large samples secured in
accordance with IS: 2132-1987 ’Code of practice for thin –walled tube sampling of soil’.
For remoulded specimen, sample may be prepared either from failed undisturbed specimen or
from a disturbed soil sample.
PROCEDURE
The initial length, diameter and weight of the specimen should be measured. The deformation
dial gauge shall be adjusted to zero and force should be applied at rate ½ to 2 percent/min. up to
6%strain the reading may be taken at every 30 s; after 6%, the frequency may be halved and
beyond 12%, it may be decreased further. The specimen should be compressed until failure or
until axial strain of 20% is reached. Failure pattern shall be sketched carefully and shown on the
data sheet or on the sheet presenting the stress-strain plot. The angle between the failure
Page 64
surface and the horizontal may be measured if possible and reported. Water content is
determined with IS: 2720 (Part 2).
Data is presented in accordance with the procedures given in IS: 2720 (Part 10).
Weight 0.1grams
Time + 0.5 seconds
Deformation + 0.01 mm
Temperature +/-1oC
UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION
GENERAL
This test deals with the determination of compressive strength of specimen of saturated cohesive
soil in the triaxial compression apparatus under condition in which the cell pressure is maintained
constant and there is no change in the total water content of the specimen.
Specimen should be cylindrical of height twice the specimen diameter with plane ends normal to
the axis and with the minimum change of the soil structure and moisture content.
Remoulded samples prepared at the desired moisture and density by static and dynamic
methods of compaction or by any other suitable method may also be used where necessary.
TESTING PROCEDURE
Sample should be placed centrally in triaxial cell and cell should be assembled with loading ram
initially clear of the top cap of the specimen should be placed in the loading machine. A rate of
axial compression shall be selected such that failure is produced within a period of approximately
5 to 15 min. test should be continued until the maximum value of the stress has been passed or
until an axial strain of 20% has been reached. The cell should be drained and membrane should
be removed from the specimen and mode of failure should be recorded. Change in moisture if
any should be noted.
The dimension of each test specimen, the bulk density, the moisture content, the cell pressure,
the value of the maximum principle stress difference, the corresponding strain ,time to failure and
the rate of the strain at which the test was conducted should be reported. The stress strain curve
of test should be plotted with the axial strain as abscissa and the principal stress difference as
ordinate. The shear parameter is obtained from Mohr circle.

Page 65
Data is presented in accordance with the procedures given in IS: 2720 (Part 11) Appendix-A (Cl.
6.3)
Weight 0.5grams
Deformation + 0.01 mm
BRAZIL TEST
GENERAL
Brazil tests are typically performed on undisturbed specimens with a height to diameter ratio of
approximately 1:2. Where possible, specimens are tested at full sampled diameter. The test is
undertaken to indirectly measure the uniaxial tensile strength of the specimen and is mainly
intended for strength classification and characterization of intact rock. The tests are performed
based on the procedures given by Ulusay and Hudson (2007) Part 2.
The following is a brief outline of the procedure employed for Brazil tests on undisturbed rock
specimens.
TEST PROCEDURE
(a) Specimen Preparation
The specimen is extruded from the sample tube and carefully trimmed to right cylinder with a
minimum diameter of approximately 54 mm and a thickness approximately equal to the
specimen radius. The sides of the specimen shall be smooth and free of irregularities. The
specimen is photographed, weighed and measured to determine the bulk density and a moisture
content determination is carried out on a portion of soil representative of the soil to be tested.
Where possible, the natural water content of the specimen should be preserved and the
specimen tested in that condition.
Classification of the chalk is undertaken by a skilled geologist using Bulletin 1 from the Danish
Geotechnical Society.
(b) Compression stage

The specimen is wrapped around its circumference with one layer of double thickness adhesive
paper (masking tape) and then mounted in the apparatus such that the applied vertical load on
the apparatus is transferred to the specimen diametrically. The axis of rotation for the specimen
and apparatus is coincident.
The specimen is loaded at a constant stress rate such that failure will occur within 15-30
seconds of loading, as specified by Ulusay and Hudson (2007) Part 2. The load and vertical
displacement of the apparatus is recorded throughout the test so that the load for primary
fracture may be determined.
On completion of the compression stage, a sketch of the failure shape is made and the
specimen is removed from the loading platen and photographed. Any unusual specimen
Page 66
conditions potentially affecting interpretation of the test data are carefully noted. If required a
portion of the specimen is taken for a final water content determination.
Calculations and reporting are undertaken in accordance with the procedures given by Ulusay
and Hudson (2007) Part 2.
Displacement + 0.05 mm
Load + 1.0 N
Weight (g) + 0.01 g
Dimensions (mm) + 0.01 mm
REFERENCES
Ulusay, R. & Hudson, J.A. (2007). “The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock
Characterization, Testing Monitoring: 1974-2006” ISRM Turkish National Group.
Ulusay, R. & Hudson, J.A. (2007). “Suggested Methods for Determining the Tensile Strength of
Rock Materials” Part 2, ISRM Turkish National Group.
SP. GRAVITY, MOISTURE CONTENT & POROSITY
GENERAL
This test deals with the method of test for determination of specific gravity, water absorption and
porosity on rock.
APPARATUS:
a. An oven capable of maintaining a temperature of 105°C to 110°C for a period of at least
24hr.
b. It should have forced ventilation exhausting to outside atmosphere.
c. Specimen containers of non-corrodible material, including airtight lids.
d. Desiccators to hold specimen containers during cooling.
e. A balance of adequate capacity, capable of mass determination to 0.001 g.
f. Grinding equipment to reduce the sample to a pulverized powder less than 150µ in grain
size.
g. A calibrated volumetric flask and stopper (conveniently 50 cm3).
h. A constant temperature water bath.
i. A vacuum apparatus capable of maintaining a vacuum with a pressure of less than 800Pa.

Page 67
j. A soft brush of camel hair or of a similar softness.
PROCEDURE
a. A representative sample is selected comprising at least ten rock lumps, the shape and
size of lumps suiting the capabilities of the volume measuring apparatus. The minimum
size of each lump should preferably be either such that its mass exceeds 50 g or such
that its minimum dimension is at least ten times the maximum grain size, whichever is
the greater. Specimens of swelling or fissile rock should be sampled and stored to retain
water content to within 1% of its in situ value prior to testing.
b. The specimen container with its lid is cleaned, dried and it’s mass (A) is determined.
c. The specimen is placed in the container, the lid replaced and mass (B) of container plus
specimen at initial water content is determined.
d. The lid is removed and the specimen oven dried to constant mass at a temperature of
105°C and allowed to cool for 30 min in a desiccator. The mass (C) of container plus
oven-dry specimen is determined.
e. Together the specimen was crushed and ground to a grain size no exceeding 150µ. A
number of representative sub samples of about 15g of the pulverized material are
selected and oven-dried.
f. The mass (D) of a clean, dry volumetric flask plus stopper is determined to 0.001g.
g. The flask is filled with a fluid that is non-reactive with the rock, is brought to equilibrium
temperature in the constant temperature bath, and the liquid level is adjusted accurately
to the 50 cm 3 graduation. The flask is removed, stoppered and its mass (E) determined
to 0.001g.
h. The flask is emptied, dried, and 15g sub sample of dry, pulverized rock added with the
aid of a funnel. The mass F of flask, sample and stopper is measured to 0.001 g.
i. The flask and sub sample are evacuated for about 20 min and sufficient fluid added to
thoroughly wet the sample. Further fluid is then added and the flask carefully evacuated
to remove air. The flask is replaced in the constant temperature water bath and the liquid
level adjusted accurately to the 50 cc graduation.
j. The stoppered flask with its contents is allowed to cool and its mass G is determined to
0.001 g.
k. Steps (j)-(l) are repeated for each sub sample of pulverized material.
CALCULATIONS:
Specific gravity, water content, density and porosity calculated as follows:
(a) Water content, w % = [ (B – C) / (C – A) ] x 100
(b) Grain density, ρs = (F – D) / [ Vf x {1 – ( (G – F) / (E – D) ) } ]

Page 68

Where,
Vf = calibrated volume of flask, usually 50cm3
(c) Grain mass, Ms= C – A
(d) Dry density of rock, ρd = Ms / V
(e) Porosity, n = 100 x [ (ρs – ρd ) / ρs ] %
REFERENCES:
ISRM
POINT LOAD STRENGTH INDEX OF ROCK

GENERAL
The point load strength index test offers rapid rock strength classification on site or in the
laboratory. Results may be correlated with other strength parameters such as uniaxial tensile
and compressive strengths. The point load strength index IS(50) of rock specimen may be
determined on rock core sections (diametric and axial tests), cut blocks (block tests) or irregular
lumps (irregular lump tests).
A brief outline of the test procedures is presented below.
This is an index test for strength classification of rock where specimens are broken by
application of a concentrated load through a pair of conical points.
APPARATUS
 Point load test apparatus
 Moisture tins
 Balance
 Drying oven
 Vernier calipers
PROCEDURE
Specimens shall generally conform to the dimension requirements below.

Page 69
1) Figure 1
a) The diametric test.
b) The axial test.
c) The block test.
d) The irregular lump test.
a. The moisture condition of the specimen at the time of test is important. If samples have
dried significantly before testing, they should be re-saturated by soaking in water for a
period appropriate for the strength of the material.
b. Insert a specimen in the test device and close the platens to make contact with the
specimen.
c. Ensure the distance between the contact point and its position relative to the nearest
free end conforms to Figure 1.
d. Determine and record the specimen dimensions and distance between the platen
contact points as per figure 1.
e. Steadily increase the load such that failure occurs within 10 to 60 seconds, and record
the failure load.
f. Record the distance between platen contact points after failure
g. The test should be rejected if the fracture surface passes through only one platen
loading point (see Figure 2).
h. Take a representative portion of the material for determination of moisture content by
oven drying methods.

Page 70
Figure 2; Typical Modes of Failure for

Valid and Invalid Test Results
(a) Valid diametral test.

(b) Valid axial test.
(c) Valid block test.
(d) Invalid core test.
(e) Invalid axial test
Note: When a sample is shaley, bedded, schistose or otherwise observably anisotropic, it should be
tested in directions that give the greatest and least strength values, i.e. parallel and
perpendicular to the planes of anisotropy.
REFERENCES:
IS: 8764
ASTM D 5731-95
ISRM
UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF ROCK
This test determines the uni-axial compressive strength of cylindrical intact rock specimens. The
test is intended for classification and characterization of intact rock. A rock specimen with a
height to diameter ratio of 2 to 2.5 is placed in a loading device. The diameter of the rock core
will be N Size (54mm). The sides of the specimen will be generally smooth and free of abrupt
irregularities, with all the elements straight to within 0.5 mm over the full length of the specimen.
The ends are cut parallel to each other and at right angles to the longitudinal axis. The end
surfaces are lapped flat to a tolerance not to exceed25 μm. The specimen is subsequently
loaded at a constant rate of force or constant rate of strain until failure. Test results are
calculated as follows:
σc = P/A
Where,

Page 71

σc = uni-axial Compressive Strength [MPa]
P = compressive load required to fracture the specimen [N]
A = initial cross sectional area [mm 2]
DEFORMATION MODULUS TEST ON ROCK
GENERAL
Determination of Young’s Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of cylindrical specimen in
compression.
THEORY:
The test determines the uniaxial compressive strength and optionally the deformability
characteristics of cylindrical intact rock specimens. The test is intended for classification and
characterization of intact rock.
APPARATUS
Loading Machine for applying and measuring the axial load to the specimen
End discs used as platens for specimen ends
Strain gauges, Dial gauge/LVDT/LVDTs or means to measure the axial and circumferential
deformations of the specimen.
PROCEDURE:
Specimen should be chosen at natural water content or at seven days of drying in air.
A rock specimen with a height to diameter ratio of 2 to 3 is placed in a loading device.
The specimen is subsequently loaded at a constant rate of force of about 0.5-1 MPa/s normally
to fail the specimen in 5 to 10 minutes.
Load and the axial and circumferential deformations shall be measured frequently.
CALCULATION
c = P/A
Et = /a
= -Et (d/)
Where,
c = Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
P = Axial Compressive Load to fracture the specimen (N)
A = Initial cross-section area
Et= Tangent Modulus at 50% of c

 = Uniaxial Compressive Stress (MPa)
a= Axial Strain (%)
= Poisson’s Ratio at 50% of c
d= Diametric Strain (%)
Page 72
REFERENCES
IS 9143, IS 9221, ISRM, ASTM D 7012
PETROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
The sample received is subjected to petrographic examination in accordance with the method
described in ASTM C295 – 03.
At the beginning the sample is subjected to macroscopic examination for physical properties
and some chemical tests to observe reactivity with dilute hydrochloric acid.
The sample is then subjected to physical examination by an experienced Geologist to identify the
rock type. After physical examination the rock core is broken into small fragment to prepare a
large area thin section for detailed identification of mineral composition. The prepared thin
section is then examined under high power Petrological microscope using plane polarized and
crossed polarized light with magnifications up to x450. After examining the thin section,
photomicrographs are taken depicting the representative rock type.
CHEMICAL TESTING
GENERAL
Chemical testing may be required to determine the amount of chemical substances, including
organic matter, in samples of soil in order to assist in, for example, the design of structures and
pipelines to resist chemical attack and corrosion.
Testing is generally performed in accordance with IS: 2720, but the different parts of method as
described below.
TEST PROCEDURES
(i) Organic matter
Samples are tested according to IS 2720 (Part-22). Samples are dried at 50°C, weighed,
ignited in a muffle furnace at 440° (±25°) C, then weighed again. The mass that is lost as a
proportion of the dry mass is deemed to be the organic content.
(ii) Total sulphate content of soil
Samples are tested according to IS 2720 (Part 27). The dried soil is extracted with a 10%
solution of hydrochloric acid. The extract is adjusted to slightly alkaline pH with ammonia, then
barium chloride solution is added to precipitate the sulphate. The barium sulphate precipitate is
collected by filtration, and is washed, dried and weighed. The mass of barium sulphate
recovered is used to calculate the sulphate content of the original soil.

Page 73
(iii) Water-soluble sulphate content of soil

Samples are tested according to IS 2720 (Part 27). Dry soil is extracted with distilled water (2:1
soil to water ratio by weight) with agitation for at least 16 hours. The resulting soil suspension
is filtered and then treated as above for the total sulphate content.
The solubility of calcium sulphate in water is limited at neutral pH and soils with levels above
approximately 2500mg/kg sulphate (0.25%) will give a false-low result. The soil to water
extraction ratio may need to be increased in these cases.
(iv)pH Value
Samples are tested according to IS: 2720 (Part 26). The soil sample (30 ± 0.1g) is extracted
with 75 mL of distilled water and the pH of the resulting suspension is measured with a
calibrated (by means of Standard buffer solution) pH meter.
(iv) Chloride content
For the water soluble content, soil samples are extracted with a volume of water equal to twice
the mass of the soil. The extract is filtered and acidified with a small amount of nitric acid.
Standardized silver nitrate solution is then added to precipitate the chloride as its silver salt.
The amount of precipitated silver remaining in solution is then determined by titration.
An acid-soluble version of the test is also available, with the initial extraction being with nitric
acid instead of water.
The results are presented in tabular form in percent, g/kg or mg/kg of dry soil.
5.0 REFERENCES
Various Standard Codes & specifications to be followed for smooth Execution of Project.
IS-1498- Classification and Identification of Soil for General Engineering Purposes.
IS- 1888- Method of load tests on soils.
IS- 1892- Code of Practice for Subsurface investigations for Foundations
IS: 1904 – Code of Practice for design and construction of Foundations in soils: General
requirements.
IS: 2131- Method of standard Penetration Test for soils.
IS: 2132- Code of practice for Thin Walled Tube Sampling of soils.
IS: 2386- (Part 8) Methods of test for aggregates for concrete: Part 8 Petrographic examination.
IS: 2720- (Part 1 to 41) - Methods of Test for soils.
IS: 2809 - Glossary of Terms and Symbols Relating to soil Engineering.
IS: 2810 – Glossary of Terms Relating to soil Dynamics.
IS- 4078- Code of practice for indexing and storage of Drill cores.
IS-4332- (Part I to Part 10) – Methods of Test for Stabilized soils.

Page 74

IS: 4434-1978 - Code of Practice for In-Situ Vane Shear Test for Soils.
IS: 4464-1985 - Code of Practice for Presentation of Drilling information and Core Description in
Foundation Investigation.
IS: 4968-1979 - (Part I to Part III) - Method of Sub-Surface Sounding.
IS: 5249- Method of Test for Determination of Dynamic Properties of soil
IS: 5313- Guide for Core Drilling Observations.
IS: 5529- (Part 1 and Part 2) - Codes of practice for In-Situ Permeability test.
IS: 12955 (Part 1&2) – In situ determination of rock mass deformability using a flexible
dilatometer.
ASTM: D- 4719 - Pressure meter in soil
ASTM: D –4428 M Test methods for seismic cross hole test.
IS: 11315 (Part 11) – Method for quantitative descriptions of discontinuities in rock masses.
IS: 6403 - Code of practice for Determination of Bearing Pressure shallow for foundations.
IS: 7317 - Code of practice for Uniaxial Jacking Test for Deformation Modules of Rock
IS: 8009- (Part 1 and Part2) Codes of Practice for calculation of settlement of Foundations.
IS: 8764- Method for Determination of Point Load Strength Index of Rock specimen
IS: 9143- Method for the Determination of Unconfined Compressive of Rock materials.
IS: 9179- Method for the Preparation of Rock Specimen for Lab Testing.
IS: 9221- Method for the Determination of Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Rock
Materials in Uniaxial Compression.
IS: 10082- Method of Test for the Determination of Tensile Strength by Indirect Tests on Rock
Specimen
IS: 10782- Method for Laboratory Determination of Dynamic Modulus of Rock core Specimen.
IS: 10785- Method for Determination of Compressive and Tensile Strength of Point Load Tests
on Rock lumps.
IS: 13047 – Determination of strength of rock materials in Triaxial compression test.
IS: 13030 – Laboratory determination of Water content, Porosity, Density & related properties of
rock materials.
IS: 11315 Part II – Core recovery and rock quality designation.
ASTM: D- 2664 Triaxial compression test.
IS-2720: Part 4: PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION –

IS-2720: Part 5: ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION USING THE CONE PENETROMETER
METHOD AND CASAGRANDE FOR LIQUID LIMIT ASSESSMENT
IS-2720: Part 3: PARTICLE DENSITY DETERMINATION REFERENCES
IS 2720 – Part 15: UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION
IS: 2720 (P-12): CONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL COMPRESSIONREFERENCE

Page 75
SP. GRAVITY, MOISTURE CONTENT & POROSITY ON ROCK CORE SPECIMEN

REFERENCES: ISRM
UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF ROCKIS: 8764, ASTM D 5731-95, ISRM
BRAZILIAN TENSILE STRENGTH OF ROCK REFERENCES: b ISRM Suggested Methods, IS
10082
TRIAXIAL SHEAR TEST ON ROCK - ISRM suggested methods and IS 13047
DEFORMATION MODULUS TEST ON ROCK -REFERENCES IS 9143, IS 9221, ISRM, ASTM
D 7012
6.0 CONCLUSION
This document has presented the scope of work and method statement for each of the
geotechnical investigation works that will be carried out in site at locations specified by Client.

Page 76
HCC-MMS JV
Annexure-3
ORGANIZATION CHART FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

Page 77
HCC-MMS JV
HCC MMS JV
Site Manager-1 /
Geotechnical Expert-1
Laboratory at Navi
Mumbai-1 Subcontractor
Project Manager-1
At Head Office (Navi Mumbai)
Laboratory In-
charge-1
Field work and Testing
Lab Technicians- Site In-charge/Geologist: 1

Site Supervisors /
2 (Geotechnical Investigation)
Geophysicist: 1 Foreman’s/ Drillers
(Geophysical Investigation) Helpers/ Drilling Crew
Engineering Analysis, Recommendations and Reporting

Prepare by
Manager Engineering-1
Review by
Chief Consultant (Geotechnical)-1
Page 78
ANNEXURE-04

UGC-02 (STAGE-I)
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
Job No.: 16-1469

Page 79
FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PVT. LTD
GEOTECHNICAL FIELD LOG - Pro-forma
Ground Water Depth below EGL
Project Name: Client Name:
DATE TIME DEPTH (m)
Co- Ordinates :- Chainage (if any) :- Equipment Record :-

Borehole No :-
Location
Name
:- Field Log Summary Type of Rig :-
Termination Depth
Ground Level / Boring in
below Ground Surface :- :- :- SPT nos. :- PPT nos. :- Borehole Diameter :-
Elevation (m) Soil,m
(m)
Circulation Drilling in MPMT

Date Commenced :- :- :- UDS nos. :- :- Casing depth (m) :- PX: ………………………HX: ……………………….NX: …………………
Fluid Rock, m nos.
Drilling OPMT
Date Completed :- :- DS nos. :- FHPT nos. :- :- Core-Diameter(mm) :-
Orientation nos.
Drill Water
Type of Bit &
Sampling Details below EGL, m SPT with automated trip hammer Details of Rock Core Details of Stratum
Core Barrel
Loss
(DT/TT)
Rock Piece No.
Complet
ROP,
Partial
Sample Special Observations /
From To 150 300 450 N TCR % SCR % RQD % WG FI mm/mi Depth (m) Visual Description
e
Type From To Remark
n
LEGENDS: SPT- Standard Penetration Test TCR- Total Core Recovery SCR-Solid Core Recovery RQD-Rock Quality Designation WG-Weathering Grade FI-Fracture Index ROP-Rate of Penetration EGL - Existing Ground Level RC - Rock Core UDS - Undisturbed Soil Sample R - Refusal DT - Double Tube Core Barrel TT - Triple Tube Core Barrel DS - Disturbed Sample UDS - Undisturbed
Sample FHPT - Falling Head Permeability Test PPT - Packer Permeability Test MPMT - Menard Pressuremeter Test OPMT - Oyo Pressuremeter Test PP - Pocket Penetrometer TV - Tor Vane VST - Vane Shear Test
Weather Condition : Logged by Supervised by

Details of instrumentation if any : Fugro Client
Details of Bits, Core barrel and height, weight and drop hammer used : representative: representative:
Remarks :
FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Plot No. 51, Sector 6, Sanpada Navi Mumbai 400705, INDIA Telephone: +91 22 2775 4012/13/15 / Fax: +91 22 2775 4011 Email : mail@fugroindia.com (An ISO 9001:2008, ISO 14001:2004 & OHSAS 18001:2007 Certified Company)
Page : ____/____
Page 80
Form Title: Pressuremeter Test – Membrane Displacement Calibration

Project: Project No.:
Client: Date:
Rubber No: Calibration No: Calibrated by:
Gauge Digital Readings Inflation Gauge Digital Readings Inflation

Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure
Pressure Displacement Pressure Displacement
(MPa) (MPa) (mm) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (mm) (MPa)
Pm-dcal.frm Page …… / …..

Page 81
Form Title: Pressuremeter Test Readings

Project: Project
No.:
Client: Date:
Borehole No: Test Depth (m): Water Depths (m): (average)
Rubber No: Calibration No: Tested by:

Description of the Core Recovery TCR
strata Details
RQD
Pressure Displacement Readings Pressure Displacement Readings

Pressure reading 15sec 30sec 60sec Pressure reading 15sec 30sec 60sec
on readout unit on readout unit
(MPa) (MPa)
Pm-test.frm
Page 82

MENARD PRESSUREMETER TEST CERTIFICATE
Project:
Client: Reference Standard: 1. ASTM D4719-07 Project Code :
CALIBRATION SHEET
Pressure Calibration Inside diameter of

Date of Calibration
No. calibration pipe, mm
Volume Calibration
Time of Calibration
No.
Volume Volume Volume

Pressure, Pr Pressure, Pr Pressure, Pr
S.No Sec Change (Vr), ∆V30/60 ∆V60/60 S.No Sec Change (Vr), ∆V30/60 ∆V60/60 S.No Sec Change (Vr), ∆V30/60 ∆V60/60
(bars) (bars) 3 (bars)
cm3 cm cm3
15 15
1 0 0 0 7 30 13 30
60 60
15 15 15
2 30 8 30 14 30
60 60 60
15 15 15
3 30 9 30 15 30
60 60 60
15 15 15
4 30 10 30 16 30
60 60 60
15 15 15
5 30 11 30 17 30
60 60 60
15 15 15
6 30 12 30 18 30
60 60 60
700 15
30 30 30
650 60 60 60
15 15 15
30 30 30
600 60 60 60
15 15 15
550 30 30 30
60 60 60
500
450
Volume, cc
400
350
2.3
300 2.3
250
200
150
100
50
0 0
0.0197 4
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Pressure, Bar
This presentation of test curve is acceptable to the standards
Recall of criterion to stop according to the

standard Material Other Criteria
Test Calibration
Pressu
Volume, cm3 Volume, cm3 Type of Sonde
re
50 or 600 700 Long Φ44mm (370mm)
50 or 450 550 Short Φ44mm (210mm)
50 or 600 700 Naked Φ60mm (210mm) Calibration Supervised By: Calibrated by:
Fugro Geotech (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Plot No.51, Sector 6, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai 400705, India
T: +91 22 65168662 | F: +91 2227754011
Page 83

MENARD PRESSUREMETER TEST RECORD SHEET
Project:
Client: Reference Standard: 1. ASTM D4719-07 Project Code :
Location and Test Details Borehole and Probe Details

Method used for
Test Depth Below
Test No. test cavity Membrane Type
EGL (m):
preperation
Height of CPV unit
Borehole ID Water Depth (m): Probe Sheath
above EGL, m
E: Reduced Level Diameter of test Differential
Coordinates
N: w.r.to MSL (m): cavity, mm Pressure
Reference Pressure Length of Test
Date of Testing Length of measuring cell,
Calibration No. Cavity, m From m to m mm
Reference Volume Log of soil
Time of Testing SPT "N" (if any)
Calibration No. (indicative)
Volume Volume Volume

Pressure, Pr Pressure, Pr Pressure, Pr
S.No Sec Change (Vr), ∆V30/60 ∆V60/60 S.No Sec Change (Vr), ∆V30/60 ∆V60/60 S.No Sec Change (Vr), ∆V30/60 ∆V60/60
(bars) (bars) 3 (bars)
cm3 cm cm3
15 15
1 0 0 0 7 30 13 30
60 60
15 15 15
2 30 8 30 14 30
60 60 60
15 15 15
3 30 9 30 15 30
60 60 60
15 15 15
4 30 10 30 16 30
60 60 60
15 15 15
5 30 11 30 17 30
60 60 60
15 15 15
30 30 30
6 60 12 60 18 60
90 90 90
120 120 120

50
30 30
45 60 60
15 15
40 30 30
60 60
35 15 15
30 30
Pressure, Bar
30 60 60
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700
Volume, cc Line diagram showing borehole and test cavity
This presentation of test curve is acceptable to the standards
Recall of criterion to stop according to the
standard Material Other Criteria
Test Calibration
Pressu
Volume, cm3 Volume, cm
3
Type of Sonde
re
50 or 600 700 Long Φ44mm (370mm)
50 or 450 550 Short Φ44mm (210mm)
50 or 600 700 Naked Φ60mm (210mm) Test Supervised By: Tested by:
Fugro Geotech (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Plot No.51, Sector 6, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai 400705, India
T: +91 22 65168662 | F: +91 2227754011
Page 84
Project Name :
Client Name :
Location :
PACKER PERMEABILITY TEST RECORD SHEET
Top of Test Section, m Length of Test Section, m Job. No. Rig No Location
Bottom of Test Section, m Hole Dia in Test Area,mm Test No Pressure Gauge Make Description of Strata
Centre of Test Section, m Size of Drill Rod / Pipe BH No. Division / Kg
Bottom of Hole at the Time of Test, m Packer Type Single / Double Date of Test Flow Meter Make
Bottom of Casing, m R.L. of Ground Level,m Type of Drilling
Initial Ground Water Level, m Start Time Weather
Gauge Height above ground Level, m End Time Test Condition Method of Test : IS 5529 (Part 2)-2006 In-situ Permeability Test - Test in Bedrock
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7,

2 2 2 2 2 2 2
kg/cm kg/cm kg/cm kg/cm kg/cm kg/cm kg/cm
Total
Flowmeter Reading Time Flowmeter Reading Total Intake Time Flowmeter Reading Total Intake Time Flowmeter Reading Total Intake Time Flowmeter Reading Total Intake Time Flowmeter Reading Total Intake Time Flowmeter Reading Total Intake Time
Intake
From To Ltrs Mins From To Ltrs Mins From To Ltrs Mins From To Ltrs Mins From To Ltrs Mins From To Ltrs Mins From To Ltrs Mins
REMARK :
Page 85
FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
IN-SITU PERMEABILITY TEST RESULTS
FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST
Project:
Client:
Reference
IS 5529: Part 1: 1985
Standard used:
Borehole no. /
Date of Test
Test No.
Diameter of Test Diameter of intake pipe,
section, mm mm
Ground Water From To

Length of Test Section, m
Table, m
Length of Casing /
standpipe above Water level at time t0, m
surface, m
Height of Water Level at

time t, Ht = Water level in
Water Level in the Intake
Serial No. Time, min the Intake Pipe -
Pipe, m
Elevation of Ground
Water Table
1 0.0
2 0.5
3 1.0
4 2.0
5 3.0
6 4.0
7 5.0
8 10.0
9 15.0
10 30.0
11 45.0
12 60.0
Test conducted by Client Representative:
Signature: ……………………………… Signature: ………………………………
Name: ……………………………… Name: ………………………………
Date: ……………………………… Date: ………………………………

Page 86
ANNEXURE-05

UGC-02 (STAGE-I)
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
Job No.: 16-1469

Page 87

TIME SCHEDULE FOR PROPOSED PROJECT WORK
Project : Geotechnical Investigation works of Mumbai Metro Line -03 Package UGC-02 (Stage1)
Client : Hindustan Construction Company ltd.
Bidder: Fugro Geotech (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd.

SDH-1 SDH-2 SDH-3 SDH-6
Sr. No. Activity 0 4-Aug 5-Aug 6-Aug 7-Aug 8-Aug 9-Aug 10-Aug 11-Aug 12-Aug 13-Aug 14-Aug 15-Aug 16-Aug 17-Aug 18-Aug 19-Aug 20-Aug 21-Aug 22-Aug 23-Aug 24-Aug 25-Aug 26-Aug 27-Aug 28-Aug 29-Aug 30-Aug
1.0 LOI
2.0 Mobilisation of Rig to CST
3.0 Investigation of CST Station
a Field Works including drilling, sampling, piezo meter

installation & insitu testing
Laboratory testing
b Cross hole seismic test
Preparation of bore holes including drilling, dewatering,

inserting PVC pipes & grouting.
Conducting cross hole test
Submission of draft report

Note: This time schedule is based on the assumption that all clearances and permissions required for fieldwork are in place.
Page 88


TDH-1
Sr. No. Activity 23-Aug 24-Aug 25-Aug 26-Aug 27-Aug 28-Aug 29-Aug 30-Aug 31-Aug 1-Sep 2-Sep 3-Sep 4-Sep 5-Sep
Shifting of Rig from CST to Kalba devi tunnel bore

1.0
hole locations
Investigation of TBM Tunnel alignment from CST to
2.0
Kalba Devi station.
Field Works (Drilling, sampling, piezo meter installation
a
& insitu testing)
Laboratory testing
Submission of draft report
Page 89


SDH-21
Sr. No. Activity 23-Aug 24-Aug 25-Aug 26-Aug 27-Aug 28-Aug 29-Aug 30-Aug 31-Aug 1-Sep 2-Sep 3-Sep 4-Sep 5-Sep 6-Sep 7-Sep 8-Sep 9-Sep 10-Sep 11-Sep 12-Sep
Shifting of Rig from CST-Kalba Devi TBM location after

1.0
Grant Road Station
2.0 Investigation at Grant Road Station

a
& insitu testing)
Laboratory testing
b Cross hole seismic test
Shifting of Rig from CST Station to Grant Road Station

Submission of test report

Page 90


TDH-5 TDH-7 TDH-8
Sr. No. Activity 14-Sep 15-Sep 16-Sep 17-Sep 18-Sep 19-Sep 20-Sep 21-Sep 22-Sep 23-Sep 24-Sep 25-Sep 26-Sep 27-Sep 28-Sep 29-Sep 30-Sep 1-Oct 2-Oct 3-Oct 4-Oct 5-Oct 6-Oct 7-Oct
1.0
Shifting of Rig from Girgaon Station to TBM Tunnel
alignment from Girgaon station to Grant Road Station
Investigation of TBM Tunnel between Girgaon
2.0
station to Grant Road station
a
& insitu testing)
Laboratory testing
Page 91


SDH-17
Sr. No. Activity 5-Sep 6-Sep 7-Sep 8-Sep 9-Sep 10-Sep ##### 12-Sep 13-Sep 14-Sep 15-Sep 16-Sep 17-Sep 18-Sep 19-Sep 20-Sep 21-Sep 22-Sep 23-Sep 24-Sep 25-Sep 26-Sep 27-Sep 28-Sep 29-Sep 30-Sep
Shifting of Rig from Kalba Devi to Girgaon TBM to

1.0
Girgaon Station
2.0 Investigation of Girgaon Station

a
& insitu testing)
Laboratory testing
b Cross hole seismictest
Shifting of Rig from Grant Road Station to Girgaon

Station

Page 92


TDH-11
Sr. No. Activity 1-Oct 2-Oct 3-Oct 4-Oct 5-Oct 6-Oct 7-Oct 8-Oct 9-Oct 10-Oct 11-Oct 12-Oct
Shifting of Rig from Grant Road Station to TBM Tunnel

1.0
alignment after Grant road Station
Investigation of TBM Tunnel alignment after Grant Road
2.0
station
Field Works (Drilling, sampling, piezo meter installation &

a
insitu testing)
Laboratory testing
Page 93


SDH-11
Sr. No. Activity 23-Sep 24-Sep 25-Sep 26-Sep 27-Sep 28-Sep 29-Sep 30-Sep 1-Oct 2-Oct 3-Oct 4-Oct 5-Oct 6-Oct 7-Oct 8-Oct 9-Oct 10-Oct 11-Oct 12-Oct 13-Oct 14-Oct 15-Oct
1.0
Shifting of Rig from Girgaon to Grant Road TBM to
Kalba Devi Station
2.0 Investigation of Kalba Devi Station
a
& insitu testing)
Laboratory testing
b Cross hole seismictest
Shifting of Rig from Giragaon Station to Kalba Devi

Station

Page 94
ANNEXURE-06

UGC-02 (STAGE-I)
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
Job No.: 16-1469

Page 95

PROJECT SPECIFIC HSE PLAN
FOR
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKS OF MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 PACKAGE UGC-02 (STAGE-I)

MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
Job No.: 16-1469
Safety Always Matters
Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. Sector 6, Plot 51, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Page 96
001 05th Aug 2016 HSE PLAN AKS SKB SKB

Doc Project Specific HSE Plan Date 28/11/2006 Page 2

Page 97
DEFINITIONS / ABBREVIATIONS
ALARP - As Low as Reasonably Practicable (with regard to risk)

FGTL - Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd.
HAZID - Hazard Identification exercise
HSEMP - Health and Safety Environmental Management Plan
HOC - Hazard Observation Card
JHA - Job Hazard Analysis
LTI - Lost Time Injury
PPE - Personal Protective Equipment
Fatality – A death is resulting from a work related injury or occupational illness, regardless of the time
intervening between the injury or exposure or causing illness and the death.
First Aid Case (FAC) – Any single treatment and subsequent observation of minor scratches, cut, burns,
splinters, etc. that do not normally require medical care by the physician. Such treatment and observation is
considered a First Aid Case even if provided by a physician or registered professional personnel.
Hazard – Any object, physical effect or condition with potential to harm people, property or the environment.
High Potential Incident (HIPO) – An incident by which the combination of potential consequences and
probability are assessed to be in the “High Risk Area” of the risk assessment matrix and/ or includes one or
more fatalities in the hazard severity scale. HIPOs can be incidents that results in injuries, illness or damage
to assets, the environment or company reputation, or they can be near misses.
Incident – An unplanned event or chain of chain of events that has, or could have, result in injury, illness or
fatality or damage to assets, the environment or company reputation. Incidents do not include operations,
maintenance, quality or reliability incidents which has no HSE consequence or potential. Incidents do not
include degradation or failure of plant or equipment resulting solely from normal wear and tear (An incident is
an incident which has given rise to injury, ill health or fatality).
Injury – Any injury such as cut, fracture, sprain, amputation etc. that result from a single instantaneous
exposure.
Lost workdays (LWD) – The total number of calendar days on which the injured person was temporarily
unable to work as a result of a lost working day case.
Lost Workday Case (LWC) – Any work related injury that renders the injured person temporarily unable to
perform his normal work any day after the day on which the injury occurred. Any day includes rest day,
weekend day, scheduled holiday, public holiday or subsequent day after ceasing employment. A single
incident can give rise to several lost workday cases depending on the number of people injured as a result of
that incident.
Lost Time Injuries (LTI) – The sum of injuries resulting in fatalities, permanent total disabilities and lost
workdays cases, excluding restricted work cases and medical treatment cases.
Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) – The total no of LTIs per one million exposure hours. In case OpCos
are required to report LTIF on the basis of LTIs per two hundred exposure hours this should be clearly stated.
Medical Treatment case (MTC) - Any work related injury that involves neither lost workdays or restricted
workdays, but which requires treatment by a physician or other medical specialist. Medical treatment does not
include first aid even if a physician or registered professional personnel provide this.
Near Miss – An incident that could have caused illness, injury or damage to assets, the environment or
company reputation, or consequential business loss, but did not.
Non Work related Work Injury or Illness – A non occupational injury or illness that may require either first
Fugro Geotech (I) Pvt. Ltd. Sector 6, Plot 51, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Page 98
aid or medical treatment.
Occupational Illness – Any work related abnormal condition or disorder, rather than one resulting from an
injury that is caused by or mainly caused by exposures at work. (50% or more probability that the illness was
caused by exposure at work). Occupational illness includes acute and chronic illness or diseases that may be
caused by inhalation, absorption, ingestion or direct contact.
Permanent Total disability (PTD) – Any work related injury that permanently incapacitates an employee and
result in termination of employment.
Risk – The measure of the likelihood of occurrence of an undesirable event and the potentially adverse
consequences which this event may have upon people, the environment or economic resources.
Risk Assessment – A systemic and structured process whereby hazards present in a work place, or rising
from an activity, are identified, risk evaluated, and control measures prioritized (eliminate, substitute,
engineering, administrative and use of PPE) and put in place to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.
Safe System of Work – The term used to describe the measures taken to ensure that the work can be
carried out safely. A board team that includes the control measures (precautions and preventive measure)
competent people, supervision and monitoring, adequate plant, equipment and tools, safe access and egress
and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
Safety Briefing – A meeting involving two way dialogue to ensure that all visitors clearly understand the
requirements of (and restrictions on) them together with any relevant precautions to be taken.
Safety Guide – A document or handbook detailing essential safety guidelines in a simple, clear manner that
is carried for the duration of visit. These guidelines may be listed on the back of a safety badge.
Severity – Measure of the possible consequences of the hazard.
Page 99
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
Fugro Geotech (I) Pvt. Ltd. (Fugro) has been contracted by Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. to perform
a project on Mumbai Metro onshore drilling, and sampling. This plan addresses only the onshore drilling, and
environmental testing programs, which will include the following elements:
The purpose of this HSE work plan is to ensure safe work conditions and protection of the environment in
accordance with Fugro standard of practice, and in conformance with project-specific requirements.
Fugro is committed to provide a healthy and safe workplace for all people at each work location and to
protect the environment in accordance with applicable laws and our HSE Policy. Our commitment is based on
the conviction that accidents are preventable. In order to achieve this objective, we will identify HSE risks
arising from our activities and reduce them to as low as reasonably practical. This document outlines the
Health, Safety and Environmental Plan for the Mumbai Metro project and has been generated in accordance
with the requirements set out by Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
1.2 REVISIONS
This Plan may be subject to revision during the course of the project as found necessary. No revision to this
plan shall be made without consent from the Project Manager and approval from Client.
1.3 SCOPE OF WORK

The detailed scope of works includes:
 Mobilization, shifting and setting of 2nos. Hydraulic Rotary drilling rig for drilling of 12nos. of
Boreholes up to 35m depth below the E.G.L. at the proposed site.
 Collection of Disturbed and Undisturbed soil samples in the boreholes based on the type of strata
encountered.
 Collection of Ground Water samples for chemical analysis.
 Carrying out Standard Penetration Tests in the boreholes.
 Field logging of the strata encountered through visual identification of lithology.
 Packing and labeling of samples and transporting them to laboratory.
 Laboratory testing of the selected soil samples as per specification and lab schedule to be issued
by Fugro and approved by client.
 Carrying out a total of 40nos. PMT (Menard-26 nos. and OYO-14 nos.), 24nos. Packer
Permeability test and 24nos. Falling head test at the locations directed.
 Installation of Piezometer Stand Pipe for monitoring ground level.
 To provide with individual borehole profiles, site plan and cross section profiles of boreholes.
 Preparation and submission of geotechnical report as per requirements in the specification
document.
RESPONSIBILITY
1.4 PURPOSE
Management ensures that responsibilities and authorities are defined and communicated within Fugro
Geotech in the following manner:
Page 100
- The Project Manager (PM) is responsible for overall planning, quality control and all health and safety
issues. Project team is headed by the PM. He is authorized to take necessary action to achieve project
objectives, and is responsible for adequate sourcing of the project team.
- The Site Manager on Mumbai Airport is responsible for sending out all site personnel with the required
security passes and work permits and also report progress to the PM. He is responsible for planning day to
day investigation tasks and co-ordinate between Client team and FGTL team.
The Site Supervisor is the on-site technical person in charge of the day-to-day field activities, and is also
responsible for maintaining a safe work environment and ensuring adherence to applicable environmental
regulations. Among the responsibilities of this person are the following:
 Daily supervision of site personnel;
 Coordination of activities with Client personnel and representatives;
 Conducting and documenting toolbox and health and safety meetings;
 Ongoing coordination of the work activities, and implementation of the Work Plan;
 Being a lead point of contact between the Client, field crews and management on all
matters relating to safety and environmental quality.
Management ensures organizational freedom to all personnel to:

- Initiate action to prevent nonconformity of product or service, environmental and
occupational health & safety,
- Identify and record any quality, environmental and occupational health & safety
problems,
- Initiate, recommend or provide solutions through designated channels,
- Control further processing of nonconforming product until the nonconformity has been
resolved,
- Stop any part of the work that will affect the quality of the products or services,
environment, and health & safety of the personnel.
Policy – Zero Incidents Performance
One of the project’s most important values is conducting business with the greatest care for the
health and safety of our project and our Client’s team members, the environment and the people in
the community in which we work. As a foundation for this value a Zero Incident philosophy has been
developed and adopted for the project.
To facilitate communication to all team members of the intent of the philosophy the policy will be
displayed in prominent places throughout the site and included in the project orientation program.
1.5 KEY PROJECT HEALTH AND SAFETY EXPECTATIONS

These expectations are intended as the macro-level objectives for the project. Project objectives will
be identified at the pre-mobilisation meeting by all in the field.
1.5.1 HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
 All personnel to remain fit and healthy throughout the project.

 No personnel to suffer from sunburn, dehydration or heat stress and exposure.
 High degree of good housekeeping.
 High level of hygiene.
Page 101
1.5.2 SAFETY EXPECTATIONS
 Zero Incidents.
 Compliance with Fugro Golden Rules of Safety.
 Compliance with all relevant statutory requirements.
 All hazards and incidents reported immediately.
 All employees and personnel empowered to stop work if encountering unsafe conditions.
 Daily Pre-start meetings that include a safety component.
 Weekly Toolbox Meetings.
 Assessment of Hazards and Risks prior to commencing tasks,
 Re-assessment of risk when conditions change.
 Hazard Identification Cards used to report hazards.
 Plant and equipment pre-start and maintenance inspections.
 Site review for compliance.
No limit is placed on hazard or incident reporting as Fugro management wish to encourage

personnel to report all occurrences of an unsafe nature.
1.5.3 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPECTATIONS
 Compliance with all relevant statutory requirements.

 Compliance with all permit requirements.
 Compliance with all Environmental Management Plan requirements.
 No environmental damage.
 No disposal of waste at site.
1.6 MONITORING
Monitoring involves the measurement and control of the tasks needed to comply with the objectives
set out above.
The Fugro designated HSE Site Officer and Site Manager will be responsible for monitoring and
measuring the project’s compliance to ensure they are performing in accordance with the stated goals
and objectives. This will include an analysis of the results of compliance monitoring and the
implementation of corrective actions to ensure compliance with the relevant legislation. This will be
achieved by:
 Ensuring Fugro personnel hold weekly progress meetings at site.

 Ensuring Fugro hold regular progress meetings on site;
 Ensuring all personnel attend a Project start-up induction at site.
 Ensuring all Work Method Statements (WMS) are reviewed prior to commencement of work;
 Ensuring Safety Meetings are conducted and documented during project;
 Ensuring workplace inspection results are recorded and any corrective actions implemented;
 Conducting plant and equipment pre-start inspections;
 Ensuring project audits results are recorded and any corrective actions implemented.
FUGRO POLICIES
Page 102
The following policies have been drawn up and published by Fugro management and will apply to this
project:
 Health, Safety & Environment Policy

 Smoking Policy
 Drug and Alcohol Policy
 Mobile Phone Policy
 Quality Policy
The policies are reviewed at regular intervals by the Managing Director and Divisional Managers and
revised as necessary to be bought into line with current attitudes and new legislation.
All new employees and contractors are introduced to these policies at the initial Fugro Safety
Induction.
1.7 FUGRO GOLDEN RULES OF SAFETY

Fugro have compiled nine Golden Rules of Safety to reinforce the Safety Management System and
promote safety awareness with the aim of avoiding accidents and incidents. The nine rules are:
 Personal Safety Awareness;

 Permit to Work;
 Lifting and Mechanical Handling;
 Working with Hands and Hand Tools;
 Manual Handling;
 Managing Contractors;
 Management of Change
 Working at Height; and
 Control of Substances Hazardous to Health.
A copy of the Fugro Golden Rules of Safety will be provided to all Fugro and Fugro subcontracted
personnel, as well as being discussed during the project induction in this Project.
1.8 MAIN CONTRACTOR – FUGRO

The following forms will be used in Mumbai Airport Project for effective monitoring of HSE
Management system
 Incident Report GD HSE Form 01

 Drilling Rig Check List GD/HSE/FORM/03
 Incident Investigation Report GD HSE Form 02
 Hazard observation Card (HOC) --
 Health, Safety and Environment Meeting Record HSEF-P-015.03
 Toolbox Meeting Record FGTL T 004
 Loading & Unloading Checklist FGTL 209
 Permit to work FGTL SI 002
 Tripod Daily Inspection Check List FGTL SI 006
Page 103
1.9 WORKING IN MUMBAI METRO

Fugro Geotech have established Safety Policies and Practices are the part of the FGTL Safety
Management System that deals directly with the onshore drilling operations in Mumbai Metro.
All safety rules to be strictly followed while working along road side.
1.10 VEHICLE OPERATIONS

Travelling to and from work sites, makes up a substantial part of Fugro Geotech exposure to risk, due
to third party factors, such as road conditions and other drivers operating along road side. In order to
make this part of the job as safe as possible, good defensive techniques and a good driving attitude
should be maintained. No job is so important that unsafe practices need occur in driving or any other
aspect of work.
All drivers will have a proper driver license and will not exceed the airport maximum speed limit.
1.11 DRILLING OPERATION

All drilling operation will be carried out as per the Fugro Drilling procedure and in accordance with
work order specification. Care to be taken on site specific housekeeping in every Locations, a high
standard of housekeeping always to be maintained. All drilling pads are to be barricaded by water
filled barricade so it should not fly during heavy wind flow. Fire extinguisher and First Aid box must be
available at all drilling pads. Proper disposal of waste to be carried out. Arrangement for re circulation
of drilling water to be established before start of the drilling operation.
All Fugro personnel shall be suitably qualified and experienced and physically capable of performing
the services to be provided. The Fugro Project Manager shall verify the suitability of all proposed
personnel.
All Fugro personnel will be medically fit to work. The Fugro site Manager/ supervisor shall keep up to
date records of all Fugro safety training and inductions at site and shall notify the HSE Manager when
further training is required.
1.12 PROJECT INDUCTION MEETING

A start-up project induction meeting will be held prior to start of operation. The meeting will be
arranged by the Site Manager. All project personnel will attend. The meeting will serve as a project-
specific safety induction as well as introducing all members of the team.
The agenda of this meeting shall be as follows:
 Introduction by the Fugro Site Manager and a summary of the meeting's objectives.
 Introduction to the project work scope and objectives.
 Presentation by the Fugro Project Manager on the details of the proposed Geotechnical
Program.
 Presentation by the Fugro Project Manager or Fugro HSE Site supervisor of the Fugro policies
and project HSE Plan.
 Review of project specific risks and risk management.
A list of all attendees as well as points raised and decisions made shall be minuted by the Site
Manager or nominee.
1.13 WEEKLY SAFETY MEETINGS
Page 104
A weekly safety meeting will be held during the project. The meeting will be chaired by the Site
Manager / Site Supervisor
Points to be raised and discussed at the meeting shall include:
 Review of any HSE issues that have arisen since the last meeting.
 Reports on any accidents / incidents or near misses.
 Review of HOC cards and safety suggestions.
 Reports on any Incident Investigations.
 Any HSE Alerts received from Fugro.
 Discussion of submitted HOC cards.
 Review of the proposed scope of work and the need for any review of WMS /JHA’s.
The minutes of meeting will be forwarded to the HSE Coordinator as soon as possible for review.
RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Risk Management and hazard evaluation is the key to the effective implementation of any safety
management system. The principles of ‘identify hazards, assess risks, implement control measures,
recover and monitor the effectiveness of control measures’ form the basis of hazard management.
Hazards are initially identified by a risk assessment process whereby the project team compile all
hazards identified based on their experience of carrying out similar operations. In addition hazards
that are specific to this project are identified.
All hazards are then assessed and categorised using the Risk Level Matrix into the various levels of
risk ranging from acceptable to unacceptable. Controls are then used to reduce the risk to as Low as
Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) such that the risk is acceptable.
Onsite training will be provided to ensure that all project personnel understand and can use these
tools effectively.
All personnel have the authority and responsibility to stop any task or activity they consider to
present an unacceptable risk or where hazard management is inadequate.
1.14 HAZARD OBSERVATION

Fugro have adopted a hazard observation program (HOC). The HOC program applies across all of
its field sites, vessels, etc, and provides support and training to its personnel in order to implement
safety improvements in the work place.
1.15 HAZARD CONTROL

All project personnel will be actively encouraged to correct hazards as and when identified.
Hazards outside a team member’s control or that cannot be rectified immediately are to be controlled
with barricades, warning signs, sentries etc and reported to their team leader who will initiate the
appropriate action.
Page 105
1.16 MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE (MOC)
1.16.1 PURPOSE
Fugro believe that contemplated changes to a project must be thoroughly evaluated to fully
assess and communicate their impact on safe operating conditions, personnel, community
health and safety and the environment and to determine necessary changes to operating
procedures and other project documents. The primary objective of this procedure is to
establish a systematic process for managing change in this project. It outlines the system to
revise any project safety information, procedures, practices and the agreed contract to work.
Implementing this procedure helps to assure that:
 The impact of the change upon the health and safety of personnel and community and on the
environment are assessed.
 All affected project persons are aware of and understand any project changes.
 The change is documented and any necessary revisions are made to project documents.
 The Fugro Site Manager will ensure that all the relevant persons are familiar with the concept
of Change Management.
 During the project induction, Fugro's policies on Change Management will be explained to the
crew and recorded in the minutes of the meeting.
 Communication with Management and obtaining Management Endorsement is facilitated.
PROJECT HEALTH
1.17 CONTROL OF SMOKING POLICY

Fugro is strongly committed to providing a safe working environment for all staff and contractors. To
this end, Fugro has published a Smoking Policy that includes a total ban on smoking in all offices and
enclosed work places including vehicles.
However smoking can be permitted in a designated place after approved by the client.
1.18 ALCOHOL AND DRUGS

The use of alcohol and non-prescribed drugs has been identified as a serious safety hazard on work
sites. Fugro have published a policy banning all such drugs and alcohol from any work site.
The possession, soliciting, concealment or consumption of prohibited drugs on this project is strictly
prohibited.
1.19 ULTRA VIOLET RADIATION

Exposure to strong sunlight has been identified as a serious hazard to workers. Fugro recognises its
duty of care to provide a safe working environment and has implemented several actions to ensure
that workers are not affected by ultra violet radiation. These actions include:
 Training on the effects of ultra violet radiation given during safety inductions.
 Protective clothing and creams.
 Provision of sunscreen creams at each work location.
Project team members are to wear long-sleeved clothing and hats while exposed to ultra violet
radiation and to make use of the sunscreen creams provided.
Page 106
1.20 FATIGUE MANAGEMENT

The work will be conducted on a 12 hour basis with each member of the team working no longer than
a 12 hour shift. Management and supervisors are responsible for planning operations such that their
personnel do not work long hours and are provided with adequate rest facilities.
1.21 NOISE EXPOSURE

Airport area is recognised as high noise exposure zone. Fugro recognises its duty of care to provide a
safe working environment; noise exposure activities will be identified. To minimise exposure to noise,
hearing protection (ear plugs / muffs) will be required for work activities at Mumbai Airport.
1.22 MANUAL HANDLING
 Avoid manual handling where possible and use mechanical methods.

 Assess the properties of the load.
 Carry out a manual handling risk assessment before the job.
 Consider whether the task will overstress the body and how you could avoid or reduce risk.
 Use proper lifting techniques.
 Get assistance if you need it.
 Consider the working area and the environment.
 STOP all manual handling operations immediately if any complications or deviations occur
during the manual handling process.
1.23 MEDICAL WELFARE

Basic first aid facilities will be provided by Fugro, full set of First Box will be available at site for any
emergencies. Site vehicle will also available to carry the person in an emergency.
PROJECT SAFETY
1.24 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

All Fugro personnel on the Project shall be issued with hard hats, safety boots, safety glasses and
gloves. This is the minimum requirement and additional personal protective equipment such as
hearing protection, safety harness, etc shall be issued when required.
Personnel accessing remote areas should be suitably equipped with respect to clothing and personal
protection as follows:
 Safety glasses
 Ear protection
 Safety boots
 Overall
 Hand gloves
1.25 COMMUNICATIONS
It is essential that reliable and tested communications are available at all times. Mobile phone
coverage is to be confirmed on site prior to mobilising all field personnel.
Housekeeping
Fugro identifies the high importance of good housekeeping in the working environment and is
committed in providing a high standard. Fugro achieves this by providing a safe working environment
Page 107
and has implemented several actions to ensure that workers develop a good culture in housekeeping.
These actions include:
 Induction training.
 Daily pre-start site review.
 HSE workplace site inspections.
 Site Manager and Client representative monitor site and advice or instruct as necessary.
1.26 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT

Fugro understands that many accidents occur through poor handling and maintenance of tools and
equipment. If tools are not up to standard, they shall be removed and tagged “Out of Service”. Tools
and equipment will only be used for the purpose of design and require a daily pre-start inspection
before use. Drilling Manager will take a final call on it.
1.27 REFUELLING
Although electricity related accidents during refuelling are not common, some instances have
occurred and the following safety precautions have been identified to minimize potential refuelling
hazards.
Guidelines for Safe Refuelling

 Turn of the equipment motor
 Do not smoke, light matches or lighters while refuelling.
 Position extinguishers nearby but not immediately adjacent to fuelled equipment
 Fuel containers to be bunded and stored away from external ignition sources
ENVIRONMENT
1.28 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY
The policy has been drawn up and published by Fugro management and is available for review. A
copy of the policy is contained in Appendix A. It is reviewed at regular intervals by the Managing
Director and revised as necessary to be bought into line with current attitudes and new legislation.
Throughout the performance of the work, Fugro shall conduct all operations in such a way as to
minimise impact upon the natural environment and comply with relevant Environmental Legislation.
All new employees and contractors will be introduced to this policy at the initial Fugro Safety
Induction.
1.29 IMPLEMENTED ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES

To either eliminate potential environmental risks and effects of the proposed survey or to reduce them
to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP), a number of key control and mitigation measures have
been implemented.
1.29.1 ROUTINE WASTE DISCHARGES & EMISSIONS

As outlined in the Fugro Environmental Policy, Fugro is committed to a philosophy of waste reduction
and recycling. Drilling activities and general domestic waste will be generating the most waste on site.
Fugro will use and rely on the systems and processes provided by Airport authorities. Existing,
approved methods will be used to dispose of all waste to approved treatment facilities and disposal
sites. No waste will be disposed in drilling pad. Dustbin will be used to collect any waste in drilling
Page 108
area. Separate fooding area to be identified, away from the existing work location. Daily FOD to be
carried out.
1.30 FUEL & OIL SPILLS

During the proposed drilling operations, there is a low risk of fuel and oil spillage. Spillage may occur
as a result of leaking hydraulic hoses, leaking oil drums or other unforeseen accidents. All equipment
containing hydrocarbons will be bunded and adequate SOPEP equipment will be available. Fuel will
be stored in a bunded fuel tank.
ACCIDENT / INCIDENT REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION
For this project the Fugro reporting procedure system will be used. In all incidents involving Fugro
personnel, the Site in Charge will send a copy of the accident / incident report form to the Managing
Director and Project Manager.
1.31 CATEGORIES
All accidents and incidents involving Fugro personnel or subcontractors are to be reported to the
Client Representative and the Site Manager who in turn will inform the Fugro Project Manager.
Reports must be submitted within 24 hours of the incident. Reporting is to be divided into the following
categories:
Incident Report
 Incidents or near miss

 Equipment damage or loss
 Vehicle accident / incident
 Environmental incident
Injury Report
 Minor injury, first aid treatment

 Medical treatment injury
 Lost time injury
 Fatality
Where an incident (involving Fugro personnel, contractors or equipment) requires further

investigation, the Fugro Site Manager and on-site HSE Officer will form part of the investigation team.
1.32 FIRST AID FACILITIES

Basic first aid facilities will be provided at site. Sufficient First aid box and First aid materials will be
available at site.
1.33 COMMUNICATIONS
An HSE communications plan has been developed to identify and direct the application of key
communication initiatives and activities to be adopted for the life of the project.
The objectives of the plan are to:
 Provide an efficient communications process for all site staff, supervisors and management to
assist in maintaining and improving HSE behaviours
 Implement a communications system and processes to improve reporting to the client
 Develop an effective system of reporting all incidents and attain Zero Incidents behaviour.
Page 109
1.34 PRE-START MEETINGS

Pre-Start meetings are to be held at the start of each day or at the beginning of a new phase or task.
The pre-start meetings are to be formally recorded and are held to:
 Discuss safety issues for upcoming work.
 Discuss hazards identified and corrective actions made during the previous days activities.
 Discuss the work schedule and planning for the upcoming work.
All members of Fugro and sub contractor will attend all pre-start meetings.
1.35 TOOLBOX MEETINGS

Toolbox Meetings provide structured interaction between Fugro’s management / team leaders and
their immediate workforce.
Fugro will conduct daily toolbox meetings with their team members. Attendance is mandatory for all
team members. Meetings will be conducted in accordance with the project procedure and are to
focus primarily on HSE issues.
1.36 PEOPLE-BASED SAFETY OBSERVATION PROGRAM

A people-based safety observation process will be a focal point of the HSEMP. The key elements of
this program are that it:
 provides immediate feedback to team members on both desired and at-risk behaviours
 provides a platform for feedback, coaching and leadership
 creates opportunity for peer-to-peer observation and feedback
 uses observers trained in hazard identification and knowledge of people-based safety
principles
 promotes a high degree of management and team member involvement
 uses observation data to measure trends and develop interventions through established
consultative processes including the Area HSE and Zero Incident Teams
 provides a basis for the reward and recognition of individual or team HSE excellence
 Meets both the needs and expectations of Client.
Page 110
Appendix A
PROJECT/SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY INDUCTION

PROJECT/SITE /JACK-UP HEALTH AND SAFETY INDUCTION
To be completed by the Project Manager/Senior Supervisor/Barge Master (tick if applicable)
SAFETY COMPLETED Yes No
Contract/Project Details: Project Management Plan, high risk activities, risk
assessments, method statements, work procedures, etc.
Site Layout: Details of office & welfare facilities, access/egress routes on
board the jack-up /vessel/shore-side, segregation of pedestrian and
vehicular traffic (mobilisation).
Emergency Procedures: Emergency response plan, & equipment, local
hospital & contact details, location of fire extinguishers & hoses.
Mechanical/Air/Hydraulic/Electrical Plant and Equipment: Entanglement,
traps, nips, crush, electric shock, guarding, isolation, standing
clear, before use checks.
Cranes/Lifting Equipment: colour coding, slinging & load security, storage,
SWL, before use checks, reporting defects, standing clear.
Work Activities: Drilling area– drilling & tripping in/out, winches, mixing
mud/grout, working at height, standing clear, hot work: dropped
objects, safety signs.
Housekeeping: Cleaning, hygiene, washing facilities, security of plant,
equipment & tools, slips, trips and falls.
Personal Protective Equipment: Mandatory & project requirements, working
over water / lifejackets & survival suits, fall arrest equipment,
storage/inspections.
HEALTH COMPLETED Yes No

Noise & Vibration: Plant/equipment, exposure levels, standing clear, vibration
charts, ear protection.
Hazardous Substances: COSHH assessments; lubricants, grout, mud, paint,

solvents, welding fumes, personal and respiratory protective
equipment
Drugs and Alcohol: D&A requirements & fit for work.
Accident & Incident Reporting: Procedure and report forms.
Manual Handling: Consider task, individual capabilities, load weight /shape and
environment, e.g. casing, tubular, materials, and mechanical aids.
ENVIRONMENT COMPLETED Yes No

Waste/Pollution: Oil spills, emergency spill kits, rubbish,
Do not undertake any activity unless you are competent and authorised. Fugro Golden Rules must be
compiled with at all times. Every person at site should be medically fit. All safety precautions to be
observed during his/her stay at site. Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. Will not be responsible for any personal
failure.
Employee/Visitor Name: Signature: Date:
Site-in-Charge/Site Supervisor: Signature: Date:
Page 111
ANNEXURE-A
FUGRO HSE POLICY
Page 112
FUGRO GEOTECH INDIA PVT. lTD.
HEALTH. SAFETY, SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT POLICY
Fugro Geotech India Pvt. ltd. is committed to providing a healthy, safe and secure workplace for all
people at each work tocauon and to protecting the environment in accordance with applicable laws
and our Health, Safety. Security and Environmental (HSSE) Policy. Our commitment is based on the
conviction that incidents are preventable. tn order to achieve this objective. we will identify HSSE risks
. arising from our activities and reduce them to as low as is reasonably practicable.
HSSE responsibilities are integrated in the way in which Fugro conducts its business. Successfully
managing HSSE issues is an essential component of our business strategy. Through observance and
encouragement of this Policy, we assist in protecting the environment and the overall well-being of all
our stakeholders. specifically, our employees, clients. subcontractors and communities.
Fugro Geotech tndla Pvt. ltd. Management will continue to lake a proactive approach towards
creating safe, healthy and secure working environments for all employees and will be accountable for
promoting continued safety education and training for all employees, assigning responsibility for all
aspects of the HSSE Policy. continuously reviewing potential areas of improvement. and ensuring
thorough evaluations of all incidents.
Fugro Geotech India Pvt. ltd. Is committed to safeguard the integrity of Company personnel and
assets. including our intellectuat or intangible assets, whilst acting in a manner consistent with the
laws of the countries within which the Company operates and being mindful of applicable international
standards.
Fugro Geotech Indfa Pvt. Ltd. Will continue to address the environmental impact of our operations
by reducing waste, emissions and discharges and by using energy efficiently. We strive to be good
citizens in every community in which we operate.
Fugro Geotach India Pvt. ltd. Will facilitate implementation of the HSSE Policy by having a Fugro
HSSE Management System. This system aims at continual improvement of HSSE performance
through definition of roles and responsibilities and all levels in the organisation and an efficient
communication structure. This HSSE Management System is consistent with the Fugro business
principles whereby operating companies handle their operations in accordance with instructions and
guidance from Fugro N.v.
In this way we aim to foster a HSSE performance of which we can be proud, to earn the confidence of
customers, shareholders and society at large and to enable sustained growth and development.
ftanu ~~ Date: 22 December 2015

Managing Director
Page 113
"
FUGRO GEOTECH PVT. LTD.
HSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
.. FUGRO HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT POLICY
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED is committed to provide a healthy and safe

workplace for aU people at each work location and to protect the environment in accordance with
applicable laws and our HSE Policy. Our commitment is based on the conviction that accidents are
preventable. In order to achieve this objective, we will identify HSE risks arising out of our activities
and reduce them to as low as is reasonably practicable.
Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) responsibilities are integrated in the way in which FUGRO
GEOTECH PRIVATE LI!,l1TED conducts its business. Successfully managing HSE issues is an
essential component of our business strategy, Through observance and encouragement of this policy
we assist in protecting the environment and the overall well-being of all our stakeholders, specifically
our employees, clients, subcontractors, and communities.
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED'S management will continue to take a proactive approach
towards creating safe working environments for all employees and will be accountable for promoting
continued safety education and training for all employees, assigning responsibility for all aspects of
the HSE Policy, continuously reviewing potential areas of improvement. and ensuring thorough
evaluations of all incidents.
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED will continue to address the environment and health impact
of our operations by reducing waste, emissions, and discharges and by using energy effiCiently. We
strive to be good citizens in every community in which we operate.
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED will facilitate implementation of the HSE Policy by having a
Fugro HSE Management System. This System aims at continual improvement of HSE performance
through definition of roles and responsibilities at all levels in the organization and an efficient
communication structure. This HSE Management System is consistent with the Fugro Business
Principles, whereby. operating companies handle their operations in accordance with instructions and
guidance from Fugro N.v.
In this way we aim to foster a HSE performance of which we can be proud, to earn the
confidence of customers, shareholders and society at large and to enable sustained growth
and development.
(,~~~
Santanu Moitra Date: 01 May 2015
Managing Director
Page 114
SUB CONTRACTOR POLICY
It is the policy of Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. to provide a safe and healthy work environment for the
employees of contractors and subcontractors. Contractors and subcontractors, who work on Fugro's
projects, must conduct their activities in a manner consistent with safe and healthy operating
practices, and in accordance with all-applicable safety and health rules and regulations.
REQUIREMENTS
(a) Fugro Geotech Pvl Ltd. will consider the HSE program and record of contractors and
subcontractors, during the selection process. At Fugro request, contractors and
subcontractors may be required to provide, their current HSE incident rates, and/or such other
information as determined by Fugro to be necessary or desirable to judge their prior safety
records,
(b) It is the primary responsibility of each contractor and subcontractor to provide a safe and
healthy workplace for his or her employees. All contractors and subcontractors must perform
their work in accordance with all applicable local and national governmental regulations as
well as the HSE policies and procedures of Fugro or Fugro's clients.
(c) All contractors and subcontractors shall provide their employees with appropriate medical
examinations, personal protective equipment and the necessary HSE training prior to
beginning work.
(e) All contractors and subcontractors are responsible for ensuring that their equipment is in
proper working condition and that any unsafe conditions shall be immediately corrected.
(I) All contractors and subcontractors will conduct safety meetings for their employees or have
their employees attend Fugro safety meetings as well as monitor their work activities to help
ensure safe working practices and conditions. The contractor must document each safety
meeting. stating the time, place, subject discussed, and include each employee's signature,
(9) All contractors and subcontractors are responsible 10 not.ify a Fugro supervisor immediately
on all accidents involving their employees on Fugro's projects.
(h) All contractors must comply with the Fugro HSE Policy and communicate it to their
employees.
(iJ Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. reserves the right to audiVinspect contractors HSE program,
equipment, and operations both before and during the work.
IMPLEMENTATION
(a) Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. HSE Manager has been deSignated as primarily responsible for
implementing this policy.
(b) If a contractor or its subcontractors violates this policy, then the contractor and lor
subcontractor shall take prompt aclion to correct such viola lion or to correct any hazard.
Violation of this Policy, or any applicable policy of a Fugro client, or of any applicable government
regulation may be cause for immediate removal and revocation of access by the ofiending person to
any Fugro or client property.
/' +.,
~ 1-'1....--
Managing Director
Page 115
•
,•
DRIVER & VEHICLE POLICY
Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. (FGTL) is committed to ensure the health. safety and welFare of all its
employees while at work and this includes driving whilst on company business.
This policy is applicable to all Fugro Geotech Pvt. lid. employees driving company vehicles or
private/rental vehicles supplied by company. All employees and visitors to our premises are required
to adhere to this policy when driving or operating with the company or rental supplied vehicles at all
times as well as when operating or driving with their personal vehicles, either on job or during routine
Journeys from home to work site and vice versa.
Driver competence is the main defense against vehicle accidents, because the driving environment
(road conditions, third party traffic) cannot always be controlled or anticipated. FGTl. has established
a driver and vehicle safety policy to increase the safety of our employees and the general public. The
objectives of this policy are to eliminate vehicular accidents and reduce injuries within our operations.
To minimise the risk of road accidents and injuries, it is the responsibility of the management to.
(a) Ensure that vehicle operations are licensed for the type of vehicle operated. Only
authorised persons are permitted to drive the company vehicles.
(b) To ensure FGTl Drivers adhere to safety rules and speed limit.
(c) Ensure there is a planned preventive maintenance programme for each company owned
vehicle.
(d) Investigate all vehicle accidents to determine the root cause and to recommend corrective
actions to prevent reoccurrence.
(e) Insist drivers of vehicles and the front seat passenger wear safety belts while driving.
(f) Drivers comply with traffic legislation, be conscious of road safety and demonstrate safe
driving.
(g) Provide company owned or rental vehicles, where applicable with all legal documentation
for use of employee/driver.
(h) Ensure all company owned and contracted vehicles are well maintained, in good running
conditions, suitable for the purpose and equipped with all safety and emergency
equipments/devices.
In line with above; the following control measures have been identified and shall be implemented in
accordance with local and intemationallegal requirements.
(a) Driver must check weather condition and be informed on traffic and road works along the
route to travel and, eventually, reschedule or reroute the trip in case adverse conditions
are expected.
(b) Driver must follow the speed limits and the rules established by the local regulation.
(c) Driver must maintain a safe distance from the vehicle in front to achieve complete stop
safety.
(d) II is the responsibility of driver to ensure his passengers wear seat belts at all the time.
(e) Driver must not use a mobile phone, eat or smoke while driving.
(I) Driver must bave a list of emergency contacts on vehicle to be immediately activated in
case of accidents or in other emergency situation.
(g) Driving under influence of alcohol, drugs or other controlled suostancesis striclly
prohibited.
(h) Driver shall ensure that all registration, environmental clearance papers and all other
requisite papers are available at all times in the vehicle.
(i) Driver shall be responsible to maintain and update logbook.
(j) It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure that the vehicle complies with all local
statutory requirements.
('~h_
Managing Director
• Page 116
0"
MOBILE TELEPHONE POLICY
This policy is applicable to all Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. (FGTL) employees driving company vehicles or
private/rental vehicles on company business.
Further to Heallh. Safety FGTL has introduced a mobile phone policy as part of which the use of a
mobile or similar devices while driving on Company business or driving a Company vehicle I rental
Company supplied vehicle is striCtly prohibited and considered a disciplinary offence.
A recent survey on mobile phone usage while operating an automobile indicates that drivers are 4
times more likely to have an accident while using a mobile phone. Due to this and other statistics
indicating an increase in the risk of vehicle accidents while utilizing mobile phones Fugro Geotech Pvt.
Ltd. will incorporate the lollowing:
Fugro employees who elect to use a mobile phone while driving a vehicle (personal or company
ownedlleasedlrented) on company business. are required to either use a hand free device or
alternatively pull over and stop the vehicle before attempting the call or to receive a call.
(~'h'"L-
Managing Director
Page 117
QUALITY POLICY
FUGRO GEOTECH PRfVATE LIMITED is a part of worldwide Fugro Group providing services on
collection and interpretation of data related to the Earth's surface, seabed and the soil and rock
beneath. FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED's activities are carried out all over India, onshore
and nearshore, and are primarily aimed at providing advice to the oil and gas, construction and mining
industries. These are achieved by providing high quality innovative services through professional and
specialized employees by using advanced state-of-the-art equipment and systems,
It is the policy of FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED to maintain a Quality Management System
that ensures that all the activities are carried out in a manner that meets or exceeds the requirements
agreed with the client. This policy means that we are all committed to:
• Gaining, fully documenting and understanding our ctieots: needs

• Communicaung these needs to all those Wl10 will be working to meet them
• Ensuring that the work is performed in a manner that aclually meets or exceeds those
requirements
• Maintaining records as evidence tllal those needs have been met
In order to achieve the above objectives, FUGRO .GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED will conduct data
collection, sampling and testing in a manner compatible to internationally accepted good practices,
local regulations and in accordance with the standard methods and requirements of its customers at
all times. The Quality Management System is based upon, and designed to support, the requirements
of international standards, such as BS EN ISO 9001 :2008. The Quality Management System is
mandatory for all FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED's employees and will be applied to all areas
of operation.
The company is committed to a philosophy of total quality and continuous improvement based on
periodic reviews in order to conform to the changing needs of the industry and the customers.
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVA TE LIMITED recognizes the need to maintain employees' awareness of
quality assurance, It is the policy of the company to monitor and review constantly the training
requirements of all its employees to enhance their knowledge 01, and contribution to, the company's
Quality Management Systems.
~:~t>/1--'
Santanu MOitra, Date: 01 May 2015
Managing Director
Page 118
SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY
This policy is applicable to all the staff and employees of Fugro Geotect: Pvt. Ltd. and "all other
personnel which includes full time, part time and temporary agency workers and all subcontractors.
Substance Abuse is an acknowledged hazard arising out of consumption of Drugs, Alcohol, Solvents
and other substances. Personnel who are under the influence of Drugs, Alcohol, Solvents and other
substances pose a danger not only to themselves but also to others. Any individual under such
influence whilst on duty, at any of the work location or elsewhere, shall be considered as committing a
serious breach of discipline.
The policy covers the Substance Abuse and applies to all staff and employees of Fugro Geoteeh
Pvt. Ltd. The Department Heads and Senior Managers are to ensure the (ollowing:
• Ensure that the consumption of Drugs, Alcohol, Solvent and other substances is strictly
prohibited in the office and in work site.
• Ensure Ihat the staff and employees working in Ihe office and sites are made aware of the risk
to health and safety, if under the influence of drugs and alcohol.
• Needs to be proactive in monitoring compliance and taking appropriate disciplinary action

where necessary.
• To prevent Drugs and alcohol misuse, identify personnel with a problem at an early stage and
provide assistance. Provide for counseling and rehabilitation and return to effective work.
• Where there are conflicting requirements between client policies, local laws and regulation
and Fugro Geoteeh Pvt. Ltd. policies, the most stringent control will apply.
Code of conduct (For Staff Assignments)
• All employees on assignment to projects are considered in the care, custody and control of
Fugro Geotecli Pvt. Ltd. and represent the company at all times.
• Personnel from Fugro and subcontractors are expected to exhibit behavior which is aligned
with generally accepted behavioral values.
• The excessive use of any substance, in such a way as to intentionally modify mood, behavior
or performance, may lead to impose significant safety and security risks to tne employee(s)
concerned and other personnel, and Is not allowed at any time when on assignment
(including when off-duty).
• The security classification (extreme)/ high risk) or other restrictions (restricted territory)
imposed by the Project Location could lead to the implementation of more specific policies
regarding code of conduct as a part of Project Security Plan.
• The extent of disciplinary action upon breach of the applicable code of conduct should reflect
the level of risk within the assignment. .
• tn order to eliminate any incrementat risk to the health and safety of all personnel at work
locations, Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd . policy is based on ·Zero Tolerance' towards working
under the influence of drugs and alcohol in the work place.
(~'h
Santanu Moit'ra~ Date: 01 May 2015
Managing Director
Page 119
FUGRO GEOTECH PVT. LTO.
SMOKING POLICY
This policy is applicable to all employees of Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. (FGTL), clients and visitors on
an properUes including offshore vessels/rigs.
Due to the acknowledged hazards' arising from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, it shall be
the policy of FGTL to provide a smoke free environment for all its employees and visitors. This policy
covers the smoking of any tobacco products and applies to both employees and non employees of
FGTL
• There will be no smoking of tobacco products within the facilities at any time.
• Smoking onboard Rigs or Vessels is strictly prohibited except for designated areas within the
interior of the rig or vessel.
• The decision to provide or not to provide designated smoking areas outside the buildings and
ships/rigs will be at the discretion of site management.
• The designated smoking areas will be located at the discretion of the management.
• All material used for smoking, including Cigarette butts and matches will be extinguished and
disposed off in appropriate containers which are to be found in the designated smoking areas,
Santanu Moilra Dale: 01 May 2015

Managing Director
Page 120
ANNEXURE-B
JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS
Page 121
Site, Location, Contract Name, GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORK OF MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 PACKAGE UGC-02 Risk Assessment RAS No. 16 – 1469
Jack Up or Vessel: (STAGE-I) Number:
Description of Activity / Task: On shore Geotechnical Investigation
Comments / PPE: Coverall, Safety shoe, safety helmet to be worn at all the time. Hand gloves to be worn for all the work. First aid box must be available at site. High ankle gumboot to be worn during
movement at site.
Job Hazard Initial Risk Controls Residual Risk
Steps
Hazard Description and Effect Population at Risk Hazard Likelihoo Risk Rating List all Controls Required Hazard Likelihood of Risk Rating
Severity d of Severity Occurrence
Occurren
ce
Separate the job Describe all hazards identified and Name all types of From From Classify risk Describe fully all controls applicable for each hazard From From matrix, Classify
into individual their effects for each task (from personnel at risk. matrix, matrix, rating from e.g. if PPE is used as a control, it must be matrix, identify risk rating
tasks and record Hazard ID checklist and based on Remember to identify identify matrix for specifically described. identify likelihood from matrix
in sequence observations and experience). include people severity likelihood each severity with controls for each
outside the work with no with no hazard. If a control can only be verified by documentation with in place for hazard.
Note: party who may be controls controls then it must be available. controls each hazard.
Additional hazards may be caused affected. in place in place in place
by interaction with other work for each for each All controls must be valid in that they reduce for each
hazard. hazard. severity, likelihood or both. hazard.
Loading & Back pain/injury due to improper Fugro Personnel 3 D D3  Proper manual handling procedure to be 1 D D1
Unloading of manual handling. Contractors & explained to all personal at site
materials at site Others  All materials to be arranged properly after
Slip, trip and fall while unloading and also to be arranged properly inside
loading/unloading of materials. vehicle during loading. 
 Proper care to be taken, tag line during loading/
Equipment Damage while loading/ unloading by hydra.
unloading of materials.  All lifting gears like lifting belt, D shackles to be
checked before use and if damaged must not be
Personal injury/Equipment used. Load test certificates should be available.
damage due to failure of lifting Proper communication to be maintained
gears. throughout loading/unloading operation. Only one
person will give the signal to the crane/hydra
Incident due to improper operator.
communication between site Area to be checked before loading and
people and third party contractor unloading operation. Area should be levelled and
firm for hydra/crane movement.
Equipment damage or personal Materials should be loaded/unloaded hand to
injury due to crane/hydra punch hand. No throwing of equipment.
through to soft ground Proper competent supervision to be provided
Full PPEs to be worn.
Personal injury due to fall of
equipment during manual handling
Approved by MR Issued By DH
Document No. Revision No. Revision Date Sheet No.
RAS 16 – 1469 1 of 5
Page 122

Steps
Shifting of Personal injury and/or equipment 3 C C3  Ground condition to be checked before shifting of 1 C C1
drilling rig damage due to soft ground any rig. Area to be surveyed including entire shifting
route and soft ground if any, mainly the places
Equipment damage due to lifting
where rain water get scattered.
gear failure during shifting of skid
mounted drilling rig Fugro Employees All lifting gears to be checked for any damage
And other third part before shifting of rig.
Equipment damage and/or contractor Proper communication to be maintained
personal injury due to throughout the shifting. Only one person will indicate
communication failure during the hydra/crane operator.
shifting of drilling rig. No night work without prior permission of Project
Manager.
Incident due to bad light during
night rig shifting Supervision to be provided for entire shifting
operation.
Hydra/crane or equipment getting Any change in procedure must be entered in
stuck into soft ground due to rain Change in Operation form and permission to be
water. obtained from concern Project Manager after proper
risk assessments.
Personal injury or equipment Fugro Personnel or 3 E E3 Qualified and trained personnel will be 1 E E1
Communication damage due to improper Third party performing the task.
during work communication. contractor Only essential personnel will stay on the Drilling
rig.
Supervisor to ensure all employees wear high
reflective viz vest or the overalls that contains the
reflective strips.
Proper communication to be maintained at all
the time.
PPEs to be used correctly.
Only one person will give the signal. Tool box
talk to be carried out before start of any job.
Communication between site staff and third
party contractor should be cleared and understood
by both party.
RAS 16 – 1469 2 of 5
Page 123

Steps
Setting of Rig topples due to the soft ground Fugro Personnel 3 C C3 Ground conditions to be checked before 1 C C1
Drilling rig condition resulting personal injury mobilisation. The ground should be firm and
and equipment damage. levelled.
Rig to be placed on the wooden slipper.
Contact with overhead contacts Underground utility check to be done before
resulting equipment damage and drilling.
personal injury Overhead contacts should be considered.
Overhead contacts should be removed or location of
Personal injury due to hit by the borehole to be shifted to a safe location.
tripod while erecting Only competent operator to operate drilling rig.
All person not involved in the work should be
Rig topples due to uneven ground cleared.
Tripod to be checked for any damage before
Personal injury due to slip, trip and erection. Tripod to be checked properly by a
fall competent person and tripod to be placed on tripod
shoe only.
Personal injuries or equipment Setting of rigs in uneven ground to be done
damage due to passing vehicles carefully. Area to be levelled before setting up of
on road side drilling rig.
Area to be cleaned. Good standard of
housekeeping to be maintained. All materials to be
arranged properly to avoid any slip, trip hazard.
Area to be barricaded properly so that Work in
process can be identified from long distance.
Drilling Personal injury due to entangle Fugro Personnel 4 C C4 All rotating parts to be guarded. No guard is to 1 C C1
Operation with rotating parts be removed
Equipment damage due to Only competent person will operate the drilling
improper use of drilling rig
rig. Proper drilling procedure to be followed.
Personal injury due to slip, trip and
fall during drilling operation. Area to be cleaned and arranged. Good
Personal injury due to handling of housekeeping to be maintained.
wire rope
Safe handling of wire rope to be done. Wire
Equipment damage/personal
injury due to underground utilities. rope not to be used beyond its safe working load.
Personal injuries or equipment Daily rig check to be carried out. PPEs to be worn at
damage due road passing
all the time.
vehicles
Underground utilities to be confirmed from the
client before placing of rig.
Working people to maintain eye on passing
traffic.
RAS 16 – 1469 3 of 5
Page 124
Manual Hand injuries, Fugro Personnel 3 C C3 Correct lifting method / procedures shall be 2 C C2
handling
Back pain applied.
Operation
Heavy samples should be handled by following
buddy system.
Ensure handling ropes of sample box are strong
and free from cuts/defects
use of hand gloves is must.
Follow manual handling techniques as per
Fugro Golden safety rules 2014.
Ensure regular toolbox talks are conducted.
Environmental Spillage of fuel Fugro Personnel 3 C C3 Sealed Fuel Canister to be provided. 2 C C2

and Health Land & Water pollution Ensure dip tray under diesel canister and under
Issues
rig machine to prevent from any kind of spillage.
Dehydration and heat stroke
Ensure spill kit is available.
Dust bin at rigs
Conduct briefing on heat stroke / dehydration.
Ensure electrolytes are provided for all workers
Emergency response procedure shall be in
place & briefed to all employees.
Burns Fugro Personnel 4 C C4 Inspect fire extinguisher and report if defective. 2 C C2
General Hazards Injuries to personal or empty fire extinguisher
Damage of ear drum Supervisor to ensure certified. Inspected fire
extinguishers available at site with Rig machines &
Fire & Explosion
vehicles
No smoking near drilling rigs.
Noise Fire drill to be conducted
Fire extinguishers in place
Conduct TBT and briefed hazards and risk.
Ensure all employees wear required PPE
Ensure everyone near to rig machine wear ear plugs
RAS 16 – 1469 4 of 5
Page 125
RA Prepared By: Irfan Shah Signature Date: 03 Aug 2016
RA Reviewed By: Signature Date:
RA Accepted By: Signature Date:
RAS 16 – 1469 5 of 5
Page 126
Annexure -7 Machinery tools Equipment
Master List of Materials for Onshore for Mumbai

Sr. No. Discription Unit Qty.
1 Rig - Edco FGTL-105 No. 1
2 SP3L Pump FGTL 210 No. 1
3 HX Casing (4") (101.6mm) OD (114.3 mm) Mtrs 25
4 NX Casing (3") (76.2mm) OD ( 88.9 mm) Mtrs 35
5 NW Rod ( ID 57.2mm) OD (66.7mm) Mtrs 45
6 BW Rod ID ( 44.5 mm) OD ( 54.0 mm) Mtrs 45
7 HX Casing Head No. 1
8 NX Casing Head No. 1
9 NW Hoisting No. 1
10 NW Water Swivel No. 2
11 SPT Set Set 2
12 SPT Cutting Shoe No. 5
13 Trip Hammer Complete Set No. 1
14 3" Thick Wall UDS Tube No. 20
15 3" Thick Wall UDS Head No. 1
16 HX Casing Shoe Bit TC No. 1
17 HX Casing Shoe Bit S/Set No. 1
18 NX Casing Shoe Bit TC No. 1
19 NX Casing Shoe Bit S/Set No. 1
20 NX Casing Shoe Bit Imp No. 1
21 NX Core Bit S/Set (Core dia 54.73m H.dia 75.31m) No. 1
22 NX Core Bit Imp(Core dia 54.73m H.dia 75.31m) No. 1
23 NWG D/T Reaming Shell No. 1
24 NX Core Catcher No. 5
25 NWG D/T Core Barrel No. 1
26 Pipe wrench - 36 " No. 2
27 Pipe wrench - 24" No. 2
29 Chain Tangue - 100mm No. 1
30 Tool Box No. 1
31 Fix Spanner Set Set 1
32 Ring Spanner Set Set 1
33 Hammer 10 Lbs No. 1
35 Screw Driver 12” No. 1
36 Flat File No. 1
37 Round File No. 1
38 Cutting Plier No. 1
39 Screw Spanner No. 1
40 Hacksaw Frame No. 1
41 Hacksaw Blade No. 3
42 Measuring Tape (5mtr) No. 1
43 Crow Bar No. 1
44 Spade No. 1
45 Pickaxe No. 1
46 Grease Gun No. 1
47 Allen key set Set 1
48 Water Tank 1000ltr No. 2
50 PVC Can35ltr No. 1
51 PVC Can 20ltr No. 2
52 3" Suction Hose No. 1
53 1 1/4" Delivery Hose No. 2
54 First Aid Box No. 1
55 Fire Extinguisher No. 1
56 Oil Spil Kit No. 1
57 Dustbin Bucket No. 1
58 Garbage Bag Pkt 1
59 Safety Helmet No. 4
60 Safety Goggle No. 5
61 Hand Gloves Pair 36
62 Safety Harness No. 1
63 Caution Tape Roll 1
Page 127
Annexure -7 Machinery tools Equipment

64 Lifting Belt 3Tonx3mtr No. 4
65 D' Shackle 3Ton No. 5
66 Face Mask No. 5
67 Ear Plug No. 5
68 Stove No. 1
69 GI Bucket No. 1
70 Tiffin Box No. 4
71 Iron Pan No. 1
72 Sample bag kg 1
73 Chalk Box 1
74 Wax kg 5
75 Cotton Rags kg 5
76 Core Box No 20
77 O. Grease kg 2
78 Bearing Grease kg 1
79 Wire Brush No 4
80 Sutli (Jute Thread) kg 1
81 Silpoline No. 2
82 Jubli Clamp 3" No. 2
83 Bentonite Bag 2
84 Wooden Planks 8'x4”x4” No. 2
85 BW Pin to NW Box No. 1
86 Mud Tank No. 1
Oyo Pressure Meter
1 Elastmeter HQ Sonde No. 1
2 Elastmeter -2 Digital Indicator No. 1
3 High Pressure Water Pipe No. 1
4 Control Cable No. 1
5 High Pressure Pump No. 1
6 Pressure Calibration Pipe No. 1
7 Power Chords No. 1
8 Tool & Tackles No. 1
9 Membrance No. 1
10 Displacement Calibration Ring No. 1
11 Rod Reducer No. 1
12 Guide Ring No. 2
Menard Pressure Meter
1 Menard Pressure Meter FGTL-312/1 & 312/2 No. 1
2 Calibration Tube 66mm No. 1
3 Calibration Tube 63mm No. 1
4 Slotted Tube No. 1
5 60mm Naked Probe No. 1
6 44mm long Probe No. 1
7 Outer Membrane 60mm No. 2
8 Outer Membrane 44mm No. 2
9 Inner Membrane 60mm No. 3
10 Inner Membrane 44mm No. 3
11 Water Cable Mtr 1
12 Gas Cable No. 1
13 Nitrogen Cylinder Regulator No. 1
14 Rock Roller Bit No. 1
15 Isulation Tape No. 5
16 Taflon Tape No. 3
17 Shelby Tube No. 1
Packer
1 NW Double Packer Set No. 1
2 Water Meter No. 1
3 Packer Cylinder No. 1
4 Packer Rubber No. 4
5 Pressure Gauge No. 1
Page 128
Annexure-7 Machinery Tools Equipment

1 Rig Drillmax-400 FGTL-109 No. 1
2 Drillmax Pump FGTL 232 No. 1
3 Tripod Set Set 1
4 HX Casing (4") (101.6mm) OD (114.3 mm) Mtrs 25
5 NX Casing (3") (76.2mm) OD ( 88.9 mm) Mtrs 35
6 NW Rod ( ID 57.2mm) OD (66.7mm) Mtrs 45
7 HX Casing Head No. 1
8 NX Casing Head No. 1
9 NW Hoisting No. 1
10 NW Water Swivel No. 2
11 SPT Set Set 2
12 SPT Cutting Shoe No. 5
13 Trip Hammer Complete Set No. 1
14 3" Thick Wall UDS Tube No. 20
15 3" Thick Wall UDS Head No. 1
16 HX Casing Bit S/Set No. 1
17 HX Casing Shoe Bit TC No. 1
18 HX Casing Shoe Bit S/Set No. 1
19 NX Casing Shoe Bit TC No. 1
20 NX Casing Shoe Bit S/Set No. 1
21 NX Casing Shoe Bit Imp No. 1
22 NX Core Bit S/Set (Core dia 54.73m H.dia 75.31m) No. 1
23 NX Core Bit Imp(Core dia 54.73m H.dia 75.31m) No. 1
24 NWG D/T Reaming Shell No. 1
25 NX Core Catcher No. 5
26 NWG D/T Core Barrel No. 1
27 Pipe wrench - 36 " No. 2
30 Chain Tangue - 100mm No. 1
31 Tool Box No. 1
32 Fix Spanner Set Set 1
33 Ring Spanner Set Set 1
36 Screw Driver 12” No. 1
37 Flat File No. 1
38 Round File No. 1
39 Cutting Plier No. 1
40 Screw Spanner No. 1
41 Hacksaw Frame No. 1
42 Hacksaw Blade No. 3
43 Measuring Tape (5mtr) No. 1
44 Crow Bar No. 1
45 Spade No. 1
46 Pickaxe No. 1
47 Grease Gun No. 1
48 Allen key set Set 1
51 PVC Can35ltr No. 1
52 PVC Can 20ltr No. 2
53 3" Suction Hose No. 1
54 1 1/4" Delivery Hose No. 2
Page 129
Annexure-7 Machinery Tools Equipment

55 First Aid Box No. 1
56 Fire Extinguisher No. 1
57 Oil Spil Kit No. 1
58 Dustbin Bucket No. 1
59 Garbage Bag Pkt 1
60 Safety Helmet No. 4
61 Safety Goggle No. 5
62 Hand Gloves Pair 36
63 Safety Harness No. 1
64 Caution Tape Roll 1
65 Lifting Belt 3Tonx3mtr No. 4
66 D' Shackle 3Ton No. 5
67 Face Mask No. 5
68 Ear Plug No. 5
69 GI Bucket No. 1
70 Tiffin Box No. 4
71 Sample bag kg 1
72 Chalk Box 1
73 Wax kg 5
74 Cotton Rags kg 5
75 Core Box No 25
76 O. Grease kg 2
77 Bearing Grease kg 1
78 Wire Brush No 4
79 Sutli (Jute Thread) kg 1
80 Silpoline No. 2
81 Jubli Clamp 3" No. 2
82 Bentonite Bag 2
83 Mud Tank No. 1
Page 130
EMPLOYEE'S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION

(Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. Of India)
SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE VASHI
Tower No.6, 5th Floor, Vashi Stn. Complex, Vashi, Navi Mumbai-400 703
NO.MHIPFIV ASffiIENF/Circle-I/977091 dt
C:. l{ 2- DT -.c.-:
11212013>
{TL16bt
r ~~
To,
Mis. Fugro Geotech (India) Pvt. Ltd
Sector-6, Plot No. 51, Sanpada
Navi Mumbai '
Sub: Change in the name of your company.
Sir,
PI ease..refer to your letter dated 13.08.2015 regarding change in the name of the company
from
Mis. Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd

to
Mis. Fugro Geotech (India) Pvt. Ltd
The above change in the name of the company is noted by this office. You are therefore directed to
comply in the above name only.
(D~
Assistant PF Commissioner
Sub-Regional Office, Vashi
. . \3'7 't?"~ q~i~, ~1
~aqf<f!iim~bi5 ~..t.~~,
Page 131
BY R.P.A.D. '_ cihl~,~.~{'(.~.m.iT~i;.JG,
~~, ~~-400604.
OFFICE OF tHE REG~NAL ?RO~DENT FUNq ~~AISSfONER,
8HAVI3HYAIN;rOHIpAAVAN, 3,«1, .B,ANDRA ~, BOMBAY-51.
Date : ~IS [zoo (.
\ ..
\ .
\
" .
5ub .. : Employees' Pz ov Lacrrt funds & lViisc.Provisions
Act, 1952 & Scheme framcQ_ tbe!j_9under; to. ~ I I 1
Bz an ch/He ad 0 ff ice M/ s , tu.(;r'(~(l..:f(l[) Cleotech Lrt-<::1 •
/ .
Ref
--- fTcc:t-tp p-l 05[0 , {2COI: q+'I&-S-~.2DO I
Your letter No. . .. ~ ~ ., .
Sir, ../
A separate/~e 9';f!f09
No. MH/ to your Branch/Head
Off~ce/Establ£Shmcnt, M/ s.fuq:Q:_I:::NO~ Geo~~c~ L+cl, :OI-~01.t '. I A'
Pun{f-d-ombe~, OPD'f(X):j't:D
.1.1.
f'()OT~ru\ltcd at St2c-PI~(OI vcYJnc
:NQVI f'()urr~'
;__---!.----.------olIoo-Fr.
w.e.f. ~'~'2.O(J1) 'in continuation of your original Coc;i~.NO.· 'l""~
Hu.JLOof2'l.~{5
~ a'11 o~~e
~~ d ~~o M/ s._nu~~~~__
r:;'~-KND ~ c..C'okch
~ L1'OI .
':f A- • 1·(O:f.(·raT~toeE+ ?nef I prOD! I c.oCuHo· ~O_~_~.~~..u~der Scheduled
Head_.§_~r'td~~f .COY'5.«ClCtJ'C/1 .:..__ . . for
for your \ldministrative convenience. However, for all other
purpose under the ~mployees' Provident Funds & MiscellabeouG
. pr ov Ls i.ons Act 1952 the said B~anch/Hc\ld office/Establis.hment
'.'! .
will be 'treated as one alongwith your main establishment.
Thc r a t.o of contribution
i will remain ~t ~ ';0.12/ .
. This newfY- allotted code number. .should be inv\lriably

referred to in all correspondence with this office.
, . Yours fait~
. . • } 0, ~
~ ~cgional Provi~ent rund Commissioner,
. S ub-Acc oun t s Off icc, .
THAi'.JE ..
. CO?y f orwc rd cd to inf ormation & neCCGGary action to :~,
\,/1) M/ s , Rtr~Q-KND Geot-(:c/l l+d',
J-;O(-404 PunO" C &f'mbe)":::. ,
(.<)pp-I))Q-fC(I /))Oi lCef. SCZ(~-I"&.1
-- 'vnshC· t-{q\.( r;;UIOIWI'-.LtOC'.-=t05
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
FUGROGEOTECH PRIVATE LIMiTED
BALANCE SHEET ASI\T 31ST lViARCH2011
PARTICI)LAR$ . 31~O~-2011 31-03:2010

Sch.No.
Rs. in '000 Rs:iii'ooo '
$QU~CE$QF FlJNDS
Shareholde,s~' Funds
ShsreCspital
A 77,500 77,500'
Reserves.ans $urplus.
B 3;422 15,493"
Loan Funds
Secured LOans
NIL Nil.,
Total 80,922 92.993
'. A~P~IC.AT!9N OFFUNDS

: Fixed AssetS C
,
Gross Block 104,656 , 9~;7t9'
l~~S, : Ac;g.Jmulaled Pep~ec iatiol:l . 65;606 :52,940
NeU~locls- '39,050 45,839 '
Deferred T·cil(ASset 7 ;~O8 ..,.,.-

'3 121.
,
CurrentAssets, Loans and .Advitnc'es
(~~gu~E: ntAssetS; 0 47,562 46J43~
(13) ·Lo~nsandAdva.rwes . E 41,059 44,804
88,621 '91;297
. Less:CurrentLiabilitiesand Provisions
. (A) Currerit Liabiliijl;lS F 54;085 .46,024 .
(B) Pro)lislons G 472 1;241
54,557 :47,'265
Nef ~rr~fl~~et:s :3:4,QEi 4 . 44~O3~
Profit&. Loss ACCoLmt - •.

Total
80,922 92;993
I
N,~tes to AccouOts, .
K
~chedules referred to aboye form an
integral part of L~e Accounts " . .
·1 . ..
...t or rucso
1' u " K - l t" CYI
.G;?O'-" :'~ ' ~. PVT_. t~TD.
( . ... . ~'~
~Ot
Place : Kolkata
Date(l:~September 7,'2011
= - _ _.- "C.,' ,'.- - - , _ ..,' --.- _-- ."......i ET:" .•.- . - - - - :-- --- - : -. -- . - -_ _--- _ .
Page 142
FUGRO GEOTECHPRIVATE LIMITED

PROFIT AND.LOSS ACCO!JNT .'
FORlHi::YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2011
31-03"2011 ;,31-03-2010 .
PARTICULARS Sc~.No.
Rs. in '000 Rs.in '000
Rev~nl,ie
Income, Fr0l!Jqp~@tl(ms H 104,14~, 1;33,770
Other InCOIlle I 1,980 1,766
Totai 106,128 135,536:
Expeo~it!Jre:
S.it~ costs, O1Q~roper(;lti~eanc ra(jministratiiteExpenses ' J 110,2?O 1~.501 ,
Qepreciation 1~,665 '9,?68,

Ihte~~ -. to.
Total. 122,885 118;379'
ProfiH(Lo~s) t>eforeiax (16,758) 17,157

Less Provision.for::
.. )nSofl!'e'1"<lx · . .... 0 (7;qOO)
. Defe(fed r~ Asset 4,687 :358
profit/(Lo~'S!i~(te,r~~ . . (12,071) ,1 0 , 5 1 ~
&cld: Pr9fit!(Los _s,} .bro~fl~t fory<<lrp.JroO') pr~ yi?usyear 15,493 4;978
Profi/{LCisslavailable for appropratlons: 3,422 15:;493
Less :A.Ppr:opri<ltions~
.; pr(mQ~.e.~t)l\ltqe ~c( . 0 0
In9P ~~.Tax ,onprQP9s,ed blvi~.erid . . () 0
BCi.IClnc~carri"Q fqI:WCird to Balance :Sheet 3,422 '15;493
l3asic Earning ' Per sha.r~ ot

faC?,-,:~lue of Rs;10(-..ea~h <In t~s ;) (2~10) 1<83
Notes to Accounts .
Schedules.~efe(red to above fotrifan
integral.PartOftheAccounts
.. , .
p:lac~ , ,: K()I~ata .... .
p~te~: '.S ~ptem~e r 7' ~(}1 1
.~-----_ ,._- - - -
Page 143
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2010
PARTICULARS Sch.No.
31·03·2010 31·03·2009
Rs, in '000 Rs. in 'QOO
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Shareholders' Funds
Share Capital A 77,500 77,500
Reserves ans Surplus B 15,493 4,978
Loan Funds
Secured Loans NIL NIL
Total 92,993 82,478
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
Fixed Assets C
Gross Block 98,779 75,464
Less: Accumulated Depreciation 52,940 43,072
Net Block 45,839 32,392
Deferred Tax Assets 3,121 2,763
Current Assets, Loans and Advances

(A)Current Assets D 46,433 60,647
(B) Loans and Advances E 44,864 35,846
91,297 96,493
Less: Current Liabilities and Provisions

(A) Current Liabilities F 46,024 40,277
(B) Provisions G 1,241 8,893
47,265 49,170
Net Current Assets 44,033 47,323
Profit & Loss Account . .

Total 92,993 82,478
Notes to Accounts K
Schedules referred to above form an
integral part of the Accounts
AsperourReporto~~~ TOD' & CO- For FUGRO GEOTECH. ·PVT. 1.,1')),

Fo r a~~~~ ~e~.a lf
~"'
g1~tr
lJ
fR' ti,on, N,]') 304JZ2E
,ha red Accountants Yt ~~
, '
'~r~1
, "
j(}\KAPAj~1}\
P.r:nor
;'. Director
Pankaj Kakarania ' i" N 05 304

Partner Ue~erSl1lp o. ~
(M.No. 053304) 'f>'\f' '.iiYTf~Hf~' r;·1KGIECH I'~VI. tTD,.
I.'~.' Jj, c. ,e.~-.~' (.~~
Place : Kolkata
Dated: September 7, 2010
Director.
Page 144
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2010
PARTICULARS 31·03·2010 31-03.2009

Sch.No.
Rs.ln 'noo Rs.ln '000
Revenue
Income From Operations H 133.770 134,587
OtherIncome I 1,766 2,017
Total 135,536 136,604
Expenditure
Site costs, other operative and administrative Expenses J 108,501 91,139
Depreciation 9,868 7,746
Interest 10
Total 118,379 98,885
Profit I(Loss) before tax 17,157 37,719

Less . Provision for:
Income Tax (7,000 ) (14,000 )
Deferred Tax Asset 358 505
Fringe BenefitTax 0 (354\
ProfiU(Loss) after tax 10,515 23,870
Add: Profit/CLoss) brought forward from previous year 4,978 (12,165\
Prafl/(Loss) available for appropratlons 15,493 11,705
Less :Appropriations- Transferrd to Capital Redemption Reserve (5000) 0
Proposed Dividend 0 (5,750)
Income Tax on Proposed Dividend 0 (977)
Balance carried forward to BalanceSheet 10,493 4,978
Basic Earning Per Share of
face value of RS.1 01- each (in Rs.) 1.83 4.15
Notesto Accounts K
Schedules referred to above form an
integral Part of the Accounts
As perour Report of even date
For and on behalf OP~"r," ,J T('] !"l! .r>, r: 0, For }'UGRO GEOTF,CH flVT. rrn,
T~~~~~~~untan~e 1st.' ..·tion '''',\','':. :,'>L

\\19
t
h
.
,
.
~~~~:
P.L"t.
1( lX!" ,'> '
.' I Direc,tof
'I' .:.. __ ' X ri ...j-::;'-c.
v' •.:~ ' \,
Pankaj Kakarania P,l" " ..' t'

Partner Me~1lership No. CS~J04
(M.No.053304) 'J;'6I i:'lJGiLO GE:O~fIC{Jf FV'f.ti'D, ,
Place : Kolkata . (f~by'

Dated: September 7,2010 l}u:\.; <~ if) r
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Registrar of Companies, Kolkata
Nizam Palace , 2nd MSO Building , 2nd Floor , 234/4, A.J.C.Bose Road Kolkata - 700020, West Bengal, INDIA
Certificate of Incorporation pursuant to change of name

[Pursuant to rule 29 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014]
Corporate Identification Number (CIN): : U74999WB1996PTC081667
I hereby certify that the name of the company has been changed from FUGRO GEOTECH Private LIMITED to
FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED with effect from the date of this certificate and that the company is
limited by shares.
Company was originally incorporated with the name FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
Given under my hand at Kolkata this Fifteenth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen.
BIBEKANANDA MOHANTY
Registrar of Companies
Registrar of Companies
Kolkata
Mailing Address as per record available in Registrar of Companies office:
FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

3A/13RD FLOOR HASTING CHAMBERS7C KIRAN SHANKAR, ROY ROAD,
KOLKATA - 700001,
West Bengal, INDIA
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
LIST OF WORK CARRIED OUT DURING LAST EIGHTEEN YEARS (Onshore)
Value of
SL. Work Order No. Completion
Client's Postal Address Description of Works Contract Rs. in Start date Category
NO. & Date. date
Lac
1 ITD Cementation India Limited Geotechnical Investigation for reclamation work at JNPT WO No. : 002/15/WO/GTI- 20.19 8/6/2015 16/9/2015 Onshore
4, Mumbai, India FUGRO/35515DM
Div IV / JNPT -4
2 Intercontinental Consultants and Geotechnical Investigation at Versova Bridge Approach. ICT/FGTL/05/15-001 4.27 16/5/2015 28/5/2015 Onshore
Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. Dt. 13/05/2015
3 L&T Hydrocarbon Engineering,Mumbai Carrying out Geotechnical Investigation for Ethane LOI no. : LTHE/RIL- 30.70 11/4/2015 25/4/2015 Onshore
Receipt and Storage Facility at RIL Dahej. ETHANE/LOI/PM/004
4 SENER - AFCONS JV Confirmatory Geotechnical Investigation for Jairgah LNG L1-P-1501-1152-0001 Dt. 226.02 28/3/2015 10/6/2015 Onshore
Terminal, Ratnagiri District, Maharashtra. 27/03/2015
5 Consulting Engineering Services (India) Land Geotechnical Investigation for Improvement of Nil 32.68 25/3/2015 16/4/2015 Onshore
Private Limited, Platinum Tower, Plot No. Ritchi Dry Dock at Masagaon Dock Ltd., Mumbai
184, Udyog Vihar, Phase - 1, Gurgaon Pin -
122016, Haryana, India
6 Reliance Industries Limited Geotechnical Investigation for Cryogenic Piperoute MXL/31130201 ( Rev 01) 18.89 11/3/2015 11/4/2015 Onshore
7 L&T Limited - L&T Realty Geotechnical Investigation for Crecent Bay project Tower - WO No. 5200001284 7.51 18/2/2015 31/3/2015 Onshore
3, Parel, Mumbai.
8 Hazira LNG Private Limited Geotechnical Investigaiton for Proposed LNG Tanks T- Mail confirmation receivved 88.06 9/2/2015 30/4/2015 Onshore
1003 and Fire Water Tanks
9 Larsen Toubro Limited (Reality Division) Geotechnical and Geophysical Investigation works for WO No. 5200001221 29.18 7/2/2015 9/4/2015 Onshore
Phase IV, Powai East.
10 Reliance Gas Pipelines Limited Geotechnical Investigation at Rivers for DNEPL Project. WO No. XX8/31141914 84.40 5/2/2015 4/6/2015 Onshore
11 Cairn India Limited Geotechnical Investigation for Gas Processing Facility KA- PO no. 4500238363 4.90 15/1/2015 24/1/2015 Onshore
W3 and KA-W6
12 L&T Realty (L&T Limited), Powai Providing Geotechnical Investigation works for Larsen & Ref No: LOI/ NFA 14-15/2456 4.39 19/12/2014 21/2/2015 Onshore
Toubro Ltd.’s Commercial Building
13 Metro Tunneling Chennai - L&T SUCG JV Soil Investigations at Shenoy Nagar for CMRL Project MTC/TUN/WO/Fugro/T140 1.61 17/11/2014 21/11/2014 Onshore
14 Mosmetro India Private Limited Borehole Drilling for Chennai Metro Rail Prroject WO No. 243/14-15 1.83 6/11/14 17/11/14 13/12/14 Onshore
21/11/14 18/12/14 3/1/15
17/12/14
27/12/14
15 Mumbai Intenational Airport Pvt. Ltd. (GVK) Subsurface Exploration and Analysis by Geotechnical MIAL/7500000836/14/001 15.52 28/11/2014 6/1/2015 Onshore
Investigation for Pavements and Ancillary Structures in 7500000836
Airside, cSIA, Mumbai
16 Engineers India Limited Topographical Survey and Geotechnical Investigation for Letter of Acceptance Ref. No. 6.45 14/10/2014 14/11/2014 Onshore
Sea Water Desalination plant of M/s. BARC OSCOM, A628/LOA/KNM/14-15/1000
IREL, Chatrapur, Orissa
17 Reliance Injdustries Limited Geotec hnical Investigation for Cryogenic Pipeline WO No. MXL/31130201 25.01 29/9/2014 20/12/2014 Onshore
Corridor at Dahej, Gujarat
18 L&T Hydrocarbon Engineers Limited Geotechnical nInvestigation for Ethane Recfeipt and LOI No. 20.47 23/9/2014 20/10/2014 Onshore
Storage Facility at RIL Dahej. LTHE/RIL-
ETHANE/LOI/PM/003
19 ABB Ltd., Gurgaon Geotechnical Investigaiton - Site Survey and soil Order No. ABB 46.78 20/1/2015 7/3/2015 Onshore
investigation at Serab, for Agra Site Earth Electrode AB/14/NEA/PO/472
Station amendment ABB
AB/15/NEA/PO/795
20 Cairn India Limited Geotechnical Investigaiton for Well Pads Locations Rajasthan/7400015507 3.69 16/7/2014 4/8/2014 Onshore
21 L&T Realty (L&T Limited), Powai Geotechnical and Geophysical Investigation Works for WO No. 5200000622 23.76 15/5/2014 16/10/2014 Onshore
Powai West Proposed Commercial Area. Amendment -2 dated
14.11.2014
22 Cairn India Limited Geotechnical Soil Investigation for Barmer Hill Project, SO No. Rajasthan /7400015227 3.34 17/6/2014 26/6/2014 Onshore
Barmer,Rajasthan.
23 ABB Limited Geotechnical Investigation (site Survey and Investigation) ABB AB/14/NEA/PO/395 40.80 17/06/2014 25/07/2014 Onshore
at Thagiabari, balipara electrode Stn. For
Biswanathchariali Site.
24 Cairn India Limited Geotechnical survey for the raag Gas Compressor Rajasthan/7400015095 9.35 29/5/2014 27/6/2014 Onshore
Stations at RGT & VGT
25 L&T Hydrocarbon Limited Geotechnical Survey for MPT Modification at CIL LTHE-MPT/KBK/2014/0101 13.41 24/4/2014 13/5/2014 Onshore
Rajasthan. LTHE-MPT/KBK/2014/0102
26 Cairn India Limited Geotechnical Investigation for Sulpher Recovery Project Rajasthan/7400014988 4.81 12/4/2014 24/4/2014 Onshore
for Rajasthan Northern Area Development
27 Cairn India Limited Geotechnical Soil Investigaiton for MPT Train-4 Project LOI 7.68 23/3/2014 12/4/2014 Onshore
(REF 1000040445). Rajsthan/7400014011
28 Reliance Industries Limited Geotechnical Investigation works for Proposed Cryogenic MX1/31104675 49.66 10/3/2014 30/4/2014 Onshore
Ethane Receipt & Storage facility at Dahej.
29 B.Abdul Majid Soil Investigation fo the additional facilities at NPCIL/KKNPP/CTC/2014/S/26 45.00 19/2/2014 19/7/2014 Onshore
Scientific Officer 'E'(Civil) Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project Unit 1 &2. 5
Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. WOS : 200657 Dt. 06/02/2014
Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project Sub-Led: F10013
Dt: Tirunelveli Tamil Nadu
Mobile:09486702959
30 Fugro Japan Co. Ltd. Soil Investigation Work for Petronet Dahej Expension LOI Ref No. SGFJ-13084v Dt. 58.14 17/02/2014 26/02/2014 Onshore
Hulic Iidabashi Bldg. 9F, Phase - IIIA, LNG Storage Tanks. 10/12/2013
2-6-6, Iidabashi, Chiyoda-ku,
Tokyo, 102-0072 Japan.
31 ABB Limited Site Survey and Soil Investigation at Alipurduar Electrode ABB AB/14/NEA/PO/330 45.02 20/01/2014 15/04/2014 Onshore
Station for Alipurduar Converter Station. PO No. ABB
AB/14/NEA/PO/330
32 Keller Ground Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. Soil Investigation Works at "Proposed Two LNG Storage LOI Ref. No. NIL Dt. 2/1/2014 51.63 12/1/2014 23/2/2014 Onshore
Tanks at Mundra LNG Terminal, Mundra, Gujarat".
Page 152
Value of
NO. & Date. date
Lac
33 DGBT Pvt. Ltd. Consultancy Services for Additional Surveys for Consultancy Agreement No. Nil 27.87 13/01/2014 21/02/2014 Onshore
Conversion of 8th Berth as a Container Terminal - Dt.31/12/2013
Tuticorin Terminal.
34 L&T Construction Soil Investigaiton as per contract specification for our LTCD/WET-KCO/2013-2014/80 34.05 5/12/2013 16/01/2014 Onshore
Kharkai Barrage Project Jamshedpur. Dt. 19/11/2013
35 International Seaport Dredging Ltd. Drilling of Nx/Nq Size boreholes through overburden of LPO : Chennai/2013-14-166 20.60 30/09/2013 23/10/2013 Onshore
reclamation and into natural rock in Tuticorin Port.
36 Toyo Engineering India Limited Geotechnical Investigtion & Topographical Survey Works LOI 19.29 25/09/2013 30/10/2013 Onshore
for CFG3 Project at CFCL Refinery, Gadepan, Rajasthan. TEIL/CEP/6314-
G3OU/GI/FGPL/WO-001
37 Hiranandani Gas Company Pvt. Ltd., Geotechnical Investigation and Topographical Survey for HGAS-HO-00045 Dt. 47.02 17/06/2013 24/09/2013 Onshore
Mumbai. 4 MMTPA LNG Regasification Terminal at Jaigarh, 12/06/2013
Maharashtra.
38 L&T Kolkata Cluster Geotechnical Investigaiton for the proposed Ganga WO No. LTCD/PTSB/P-12-024- 6.79 17/06/2013 20/07/2013 Onshore
Express Driveway along the Southern banks of River T-Ganfapath / B-001 .
Ganga at Patna in the state of Bihar. Dt.10/6/2013
39 Gammon India Limited Geotechnical Investigations work for Sub-surface WO No. 7.81 28/03/2013 15/05/2013 Onshore
investigations at OCT. GIL/OCT/8611/DNP/SC/05 Dt.
22/3/2013
40 Department of of Atomic Energy (Heavy Soil Investigation at Heavy Water Plant (Kota). LOI No. HWP (K)/Civil/P- 25.56 18/03/2013 30/8/2013 Onshore
Water Treatment Plant) 9/2013/32 Dt. 13/2/2013
41 Larsen & Toubro Limited Geotechnical Investigation for 2 x 700 Mwe BOTi Unit of LNTPWR/BRC/SCM/RFF/LOI/1 25.23 22/02/2013 30/8/2013 Onshore
Vadodara - 390024 Rajasthan Atomic Power Project Unit 7 & 8 at 055 PO No. EPC/E14/21000-
Rawatbhata, Rajasthan. 17756/AD Dt. 13/2/2013
42 Technip India Limited Soil Investigation works for ISBL PTA Plant for JBF LOI 13.88 8/2/2013 21/05/2013 Onshore
Petrochemicals Ltd. Mangalore. PO-T450A-CK-001 Dt. 9/4/2013
43 JBF Petrochemicals Limited (Technip KT Project 2450 - NEW PTA Project, Mangalore 2450CK001, Amendment WO No. 49.10 8/2/2013 21/05/2013 Onshore
India Limited) CS 1410.01 - Soil Investigation Works. - Phase-II (OSBL). JBFPL/MNG/OS/DS/13-
14/C/001/AMEND Dt. 5/4/2013
44 JBF Petrochemicals Limited (Technip KT Project 2450 - NEW PTA Project, Mangalore 2450CK001, LOI No. TJ/Mangalore/0001 36.25 8/2/2013 21/05/2013 Onshore
India Limited) CS 1410.01 - Soil Investigation Works. - Phase-I. WO No. JBFPL/MANGALORE
/12-13/027 Dt. 25/1/2013
45 Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. Inrfa Waeala / Infra Wadala, R523/RES AND COMM. WO No. 4630009026 Dt. 53.18 17/12/2012 13/03/2013 Onshore
WADALA, C037 / RES AND COMM. WADALA, R524 / 10/1/2013
RES AND COMM. Eadala.
46 Lodha Developers Limited Geotechnical Investigation for Washington House at WO No. 4630008886 Dt. 12.04 13/12/2012 16/02/2013 Onshore
Lodha Excelus, N M Joshi Marg, Altamount Road, Mumbai. 13/3/2013
Mahaladmi, Mumbai - 400011, India
47 Fugro Japan Co. Limited. Geotechnical Investigation Works (Phase II) at Becharaji, WO No.KG 76-01 Dt. 12.68 15/11/12 24/11/2012 Onshore
(Kumagi Gumi-Maruti) Mehasana Distt. Gujarat. 01/10/2012
48 HSSG India Pvt. Ltd. Soil Investigation for Chennai Metro Rail Project- New HSSGI/144 Dt. 22/10/2012 0.90 28/10/12 5/11/2012 Onshore
Gemini stations.
49 Leighton Welspun Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical Invstigation for EPC-3 Power Generation WO/Contract No. SC-0005 8.69 24/10/12 12/11/2012 Onshore
and distribution works at Barmer, Rajasthan. dt.26/9/2012
50 Leighton Welspun Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical Invstigation for EPC-2 Power Generation SC Package No. SC-002 dt. 15.44 3/9/2012 22/10/12 Onshore
and distribution works at Barmer, Rajasthan. 8/8/2012
51 JP Infra (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. Soil Investigation for Proposed Residential Building P-125/WO/R.I/F.G.P.L/01 Dt. 2.73 7/8/2012 3/9/2012 Onshore
Mumbai. known as JP Decks at Plot Bearing CTS No. 610 at 7/8/2012
Village Matad East, Gokuldham, Mumbai.
52 Tata Projects Limited Soil / Geotechnical Investigation with Cross hole Seismic SBU-O&G/cAIRN- 11.23 31/07/2012 22/9/2012 Onshore
test CPLT, ground Temperature test Ground water Mangala/1098 Dt. 7/2/2013
Monitoring etc. Works for Cairn - Mangala (EPC-I )
Project.
53 TATA Projects Limited, Mumbai. Soil Investigation Work for Cairn EPC-1 Project at MPT, SBU - O&G/CAIRN-Mangla/241 12.36 10/7/2012 22/9/2012 Onshore
Barmer, Rajasthan. Dt. 10/7/2012
54 ABB Limited Soil Investigation activities mentioned for Biswananth ABB AB/12/NEA/PO/001 21.89 25/7/2012 6/9/2012 Onshore
NE to Agra HVDC Project, Plot 58, Sector Chariali, Assam. Amendment - 1 Dt. 9/10/2012
44,Gurgaon-122001,Haryana
55 Toyo Engineering India Limited Geotechnical Investigation work for BASF India Ltd. at F/CEP/FGTL/6304/SI/002 8.50 2/7/2012 18/07/2012 Onshore
Dahej, Gujarat. WO No. TEIL/CEP/6304-
BDGP/GI/FGTL/WO-002 Dt.25-
06-2012
56 Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation for proposed New Cuffee WO No. 4630007421 14.52 19/6/2012 27/7/2012 Onshore
Parade Project at Wadala. Amendment – 1
57 IVRCL Limited Geotechnical Investigaiton at NPCIL Kakrapar, Gujarat : 1 IVRCL/AMB/NPCIL- 7.50 24/4/2012 16/5/2012 Onshore
PLT and 1 Pump in Test (Packer test). Kakrapar/5049/4237 Dt. 6-04-
2012
58 Mountain Fall India Pvt. Ltd. Carrying out Geotechnical and geological sub-soil LOI No. K 225/45 dated 218.10 1/4/2012 1/9/2012 On shore
Expressway Complex, KM 24 Milestone, NH-investigation works for Kalai-I Hydro Electric Project 09/03/2011
8, Delhi-Gurgaon Border, Gurgaon - 122016. (1450 MW), Dam Site Alt.
59 Foster Wheeler India Private Limited Geotechnical Investigation & Topographical Survey for LOA No. ELNG/19000/LOA/101- 20.87 30/03/2012 15/05/2012 Onshore
LNG Import Storage and Regasification Terminal of M/s. GEO/001 Dt. 5-03-2012
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, at Ennore, Tamil Nadu.
60 NHPC Limited. Insitu Rock Mechanic Tests at Kotlibhel HE Project Stage- Ref. No. NH/KB 16.34 20/3/2012 30/9/2012 On shore
Kotlibhel HE Project, Stage 1A, 1A. IA/Contracts/2012/AL-68 Dt.
P.O. Devprayag, Dist - Tehri Garwal, 22/02/2012
Uttarakhand. Pin - 249301, Fax 01378
266435
Page 153
Value of
NO. & Date. date
Lac
61 Shell India Markets Private Limited Contract LUB-12-006: Soil Investigation Work for Project LUB-12-006 Dt. 23-02-2012 29.48 4/3/2012 17/5/2012 Onshore
Chennai. Putney.
62 Siemens Limited Supplimentary Soil Investigation for 100 MW Sugen Order no : 0001 Dt. 27-01-2012 3.98 2/3/2012 10/3/2012 Onshore
CCPP (IND696).
63 Fugro Survey (India) Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation for LFP & Nilpalli Channel at LOA No. COM/L/2012/241 Dt. 7.49 8/2/2012 26/2/2012 Onshore
Yanam, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh. 24-1-2012
64 IL&FS Maritime Infrastructure Co. Ltd. Land Geotechnical Investigations for Proposed LOA No. Nil Dt. 16-1-2012 15.00 5/2/2012 18/5/2012 Onshore
Parangipettai Port, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu.
65 Lodha Novel Buildfarms Private Limited, Geotechnical Investigation for proposed Residential LOI dated 25-01-2012 Dt. 25-1- 25.06 4/2/2012 28/5/2012 Onshore
Mumbai. Complex at Bhyanderpada, Thane, Maharashtra. 2012
WO No. 4630006686 Dt. 1-3-
2012
66 Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation for proposed Residential WO No. 4630006290 Dt. 14-12- 45.33 15/12/2011 9/2/2012 Onshore
Mumbai. Complex for Truck Terminal at Wadala, Mumbai. 2011
67 Hiranandani Gas Company Pvt. Ltd., Geotechnical Investigation at Jaigarh Port, Ratnagiri WO. H-Gas/FGTL/WO/2011/03 29.19 16/11/2011 25/02/2012 Onshore
Mumbai. Maharashtra. Dt. 4-11-2011
68 APM Terminals Borehole Investigation for RMG Railway Siding at APM LOI Ref. No. PPV-PRJ-077- 11.00 3/11/2011 7/12/2011 Onshore
Terminals Pipavav. 1112 Dt. 27/10/2011
69 ITC Limited Soil Investigation for development of ITC Infotech Park LOI Ref. No. NIL Dt. 05.09.2011 24.76 17/09/2011 23/10/2011 Onshore
Central Projects Organisation, ITC Infotech Phase - I at Pulikeshanagar, Bangalore.
Park, Pulikeshinagar P.O.,Bangalore -
560005
70 Maruti Suzuki India Limited Geotechnical Investigation at Maruti Rohtak. 222186 Dt. 8/6/2011 17.22 6/7/2011 2/9/2011 Onshore
Palam Road, Gurgaon, 122-015
71 Leighton Welspun Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Sub-surface site investigation at MRPL Land Fall at PO No. 1040-12-01 Dt.20-07- 3.51 28/07/2011 30/07/2011 Onshore
MRPL. 2011
72 Shell India Markets Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation Services -Shell Technical GFSRE1000712 t. 11/0/2011 31.38 22/07/2011 29/08/2011 Onshore
4th floor, RMZ Centennial -Campus,B, Centre Project in Bangalore.
Kundalahalli Main Road,
Bangalore-560048, Karnataka.
73 Gammon India Limited, Mumbai Soil Investigation at Bagchal River Bridge project. Ref. no.TMS/8413/1D/224 28.00 26/04/2011 10/6/2011 Onshore
Dt.9/4/2011
74 IIT, Mumbai Geotechnical Investigation by means of SCPT, DCPT for WO Ref.No. Nil Dt. 10/03/2011 5.11 1/4/2011 11/5/2011 Onshore
Powai Laying of gas pipeline by MGL in Mumbai / Navi Mumbai
Region.
75 Kohinoor CTNL Infrastructure Company Pvt. Geotechnical Investigation for Zone D, at Kohinoor WO/KCTNL/29/2010-11 Dt.29- 2.45 1/4/2011 30/04/2011 Onshore
Ltd. Square Project N.C. Kelkar Marg, Dadar (West). 03-2011
Dadar, Mumbai
76 Shapoori Pallonji & Co. Ltd. Soil Investigation for Dadar, Chembur,& Goregaon. SPCL/RBI/10-11/SOIL~1 Dt. 6.00 15/03/2011 14/04/2011 Onshore
41, Contractors Building,Ramjibhai Kamani 3/3/2011
Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-38.
77 POSCO E&C India Pvt. Ltd. Soil Investigation and Topographic Survey work for CRM Wo. Ref. No. Nil 13.49 28/02/2011 28/03/2011 Onshore
6th Floor, Tower-B, Park Centra Building, Project, Bhagad-Maharashtra. Dt.21-02-2011
32nd Milestone, Silokhara Road, NH-8,
Sector-30, Gurgaon (HR) - 122001
78 NPCIL Geological and Geo-Technical sub-surface investigations RRS/CTC/82000/2010/S/899 32.18 14/12/2010 13/05/2011 Onshore
Kota, Rawatbhata, Rajasthan. for NFC Plant at RR Site.”. Dt. 11/11/2010.
79 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. Topographical Survey and Geotechnical Investigation for IOCL-HHI-Fugro-LOI-001 8.68 1/12/2010 31/12/2010 Onshore
Offshore & Engineering Division, PARADIP SPM Project. dt. 1/11/2010
Offshore Civil & Architecture Dept.,1,
Jheonha-Dong, Dong-U,Ulsan,Koria-
682792
80 Siemens Ltd., 6A, Sec-18, Maruti Industrial Soil Investigation at Dahej. Contract No. : 0001 dated Nil 30.99 26/10/2010 10/12/2010 Onshore
Area, Gurgaon 122015, Haryana. (Approx-21-9-10)
81 NHPC Limited. Exploratory Core Drilling Works on HRT Alignment for LOA No. NH/TBPs/M(HQ)/1941 56.49 15/10/2010 7/8/2012 Onshore
Tawang Basin Projects, P.O. & Distt. Tawang H.E. Project Stage-II, Arunachal Pradesh". NH/TBPs/M(HQ)/184 Dt.
Tawang, arunachal Pradesh - 790104, Tel: 5/10/2010
03794 224428
Fax: 03794 224239
82 Kalyani Global Engg. Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical investigation at SEZ Site for establishing a KRDP101100001 2.27 16/09/2010 26/09/2010 Onshore
Industry house, Mundhwa, Pune-411036. stone quarry plant. dt. 8/9/2010
83 Samsung GVK JV- Land geotechnical Investigation for 4th Container 6/9/2010 474450 8/9/2010 29/09/2010 Onshore
Samsung C & T Corporation, 1321-20, Terminal. (USD 10149)
Seocho-Dong, Kangnam-Gu ,Seoul, Korea.
84 Engineers India Limited Topographical Survey and Geotechnical Investigation EIL/CONT/A056/T-046/01/FOA 27.82 22/8/2010 24/11/2010 Onshore
Engineer India Limited works for Paradip Jetty Pipeline Project of IOCL at 18-08-2010
E.I. Annexe, 1 Bhikaji Cama Place, New Paradip Orissa.
Delhi -110 066.
85 Bay of Bengal Gateway Container Terminal Geotechnical Investigation for Ennore Container BOBGTL/EIPL/0810/001 15.25 22/08/2010 21.09/2010 Onshore
Pvt. Ltd. (Eredene Infrastructure ) Terminal. 13-08-2010
86 Reliance Power Limited Geotech and Topo Survey faor Samalkot Expansion MES/33500175 36.30 6/8/2010 8/11/2010 Onshore
Corporate Procurement Group, Dhirubhai Project. 7/8/2010
Ambani Knowledge City, D Block, Ground
floor,Wing 3,Koperkhairane,
Navi Mumbai-400710
87 Willbur Smith Associates INC Geophysical & Geotechnical Investigation for planing & AYESA-WSA/ PJ /RVNL- 94.19 8/8/2010 28/11/2010 Onshore
AYESA in joint venture with Wilbursmith 2nd Design of Two Tunnels in the sate of at Andhra Pradesh. Tunnel / LET/ 10 - 03
floor, A wing Sevelvaraj Palani Towers, 381, dt.04/09/2010
Valluvar kottam high road,Nugambakkam,
Chennai-600 034
Page 154
Value of
NO. & Date. date
Lac
88 MEINHARDT (Singapore) PTE. LTD. Geotechnical Survey for Central Business District of 20-05-2010 5.31 4/6/2010 25/06/2010 Onshore
A-8, Sector-16, Noida 201 301 103ha at Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
Uttar Pradesh, INDIA.
89 NHPC LimitedTwang Basin Projects P.O. Exploratory Core drilling for Tawang Stage-I. LOI No. NH/THPs/2009/546 73.27 4/5/2009 20/06/2010 Onshore
Distt. Tawang, Arunachal, Pradesh- dt. 07/3/2009
7901042
90 ENVIRON Consulting Services (M) Sdn Drilling Groundwater Monitoring well Installation Work 20/9/2010 2.02 29/09/2010 2/10/2010 Onshore
Bhd, A307 Phileo Damansara 2, 15 Jalan Bhandup (West) Mumbai.
SS16/11, 46350 Petaling Jaya, Selangor,
Malayasia
91 Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Ltd. Soil Investigation at Pali Hill Banglow Project. SP/Pali Hill/WO/001 14.29 12/4/2010 11/5/2010 Onshore
dt. 22/4/2010
92 Gud Geotech and Dynamic GmbH Soil Investigation ( IIA3-B1105-IND/2)at German IIIA3-B1105-IND/2 4.17 7/4/2010 20/04/2010 Onshore
Dudenstr. 78, 10965 Berlin , Germany. Embassy, Chanakyapuri,New Delhi. dt. 02/03/2010
93 Mumbai Metro Transport Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed Charkop WO Ref.No. 136.42 17/02/2010 31/05/2011 Onshore
2nd floor, Satelite Silver Building,Andheri Bandra - Mankhurd Corridor of Mass Rapid Transport SER/MRS/23521204 Rivision
Kurla Road, Andheri-(E), Mumbai-400059. System at Mumbai. No. 0002 dated 10-10-2011
94 Maruti Suzuki India Limited Soil Investigation for Indian PG Project at IMT Rohtak, MSIL/PRDS/CV/2009 12.38 30/1/2010 18/2/2010 Onshore
Palam Gurgaon Road, Gurgaon - 122015. Haryana. dt. 21/01/2010
95 IVRCL Infrastructures & Projects Ltd. Geotechnical investigation Work for IOCL REFINERY IVRCL/KOL/2009-10/IOCL- 14.61 19/1/2010 18/2/2010 Onshore
IOCL Refinery Project, Paradip, Orissa -754 BOOT Project at Paradeep, Orissa. Paradip/BOOT/002
141. dt.14/01/2010
96 Oberai Realty Limited Geotechnical Investigation at Oasis Site Worli, Mumbai. Worli/WO/01/09 7.56 30/12/2009 7/2/2010 Onshore
Dr. Annie Besant Road, Next to Thapar dt. 24/12/2010
House, Worli, Mumbai-400063.
97 Essar Projects (India) ltd., Geotechnical Investigation at Deep Draught Coal Berth PPT/EPIL/VBK/11153 8.23 13/12/2009 12/1/2010 Onshore
Essar Techno Park, Building II, Swan Mill and stack yard at Paradip Port. dt. 8/12/2009
Compound, LBS Marg, Kurla (W), Mumbai-
400 070.
98 LKS India (Mebunik, S.A.) , Geotechnical Investigation for the Shirwal Cooperative 04.11.2009 4.82 11/11/2009 2/12/2009 Onshore
Row House 21, Aditya Breeze Park, Survey Industrial Park in Pune, Maharashtra (India).
No. 1, Hissa No. 2, 3,4 Mouze- Balewadi ,
Pune - 411 045 India.
99 LKS India (Mebunik, S.A.) , Geological-Geotechnical investigation for the Kider VO90079 dated 26/06/2009 5.54 11/11/2009 4/12/2009 Onshore
Row House 21, Aditya Breeze Park, Survey Facility Gat 851/2, Koregaon Bheema Taluka Shirur, Dist
No. 1, Hissa No. 2, 3,4 Mouze- Balewadi , (Pune).
Pune - 411 045 India.
100 Gammon Infrastructure Projects Limited Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Iron Ore 05.10.2009 13.50 20/10/2009 26/1/2010 Onshore
(Blue Water Iron Ore Terminal Pvt. Ltd.) Terminal at Paradip Project.
"Gammon House", Veer Savarkar Marg,
Prebhadevi, Mumbai
101 POSCO E&C India Pvt. Ltd. Soil Investigation for CGL Project at Mahad, Maharashtra. POSCO/WO-I-SI-09-10/0001 8.00 6/10/2009 2/11/2009 Onshore
6th Floor, Tower- B, Park Centra Building, dated 1st Oct. 2009
32nd Milestone, Silokhara Road, NH-8,
Sector-30, Gurgaon (HR) - 122 001.
102 Steel Authority of India Ltd., Geotechnical Investigation work for SMS III Area (Pkg DGMI/c (PCC)/5/09/1432 dated 11.69 5/9/2009 31/10/2009 Onshore
Bhilai Steel Plant Bhilai 490001 (CG) 110 A-1) at BSP , Bhilai. 17-08-2009
103 Indian Gas Limited Integrated Manappad Port Project – Geotechnical LOI Ref. No. 28.82 15/06/2009 22/04/2010 Onshore
Suite D-1st Floor, Sun Plaza Complex No. Investigation IGL/Fugrotech/94/2166 Dt.
39, G.N. Chetty Road, Chennai – 600006. 09/06/2009
104 Indian Meteorological Department, Geotechnical and Geophysical Investigations under Work Order File No 58.42 16/04/2009 28/06/2010 On shore
Earthquake Risk Evaluation Center, Seismic Microzonation of National Capital Territory CPU/52/0608/6379/8511 dated
Mausam Bhavan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi- (NCT), Delhi. April 15, 2009
110 003
105 Punj Lloyd Limited , Geotechnical Investigation & Hydrological Survey for PLL/PROJ/PIIN21/LOI/01 dated 13.00 6/4/2009 8/5/2009 Onshore
Corporate office II , 95 Institutional Area, Darod Jafrabad Pipeline Project ,Sec-B. 25.03.2009
Sector-32, Gurgaon.
106 NHPC Limited Twang Basin Projects P.O. Exploratory Core drilling for Tawang Stage-II. LOI No. NH/THPs/2009/547 89.64 31/3/2009 30/08/2010 Onshore
Distt. Tawang, Arunachal, Pradesh- dt. 07/3/2009
7901042
107 SCOMI Engineering BHD , URBAN Soil Investigation work for Mumbai Monorail Project Line - Nil dated 07/01/2009 63.00 6/3/2009 21/08/2009 Onshore
TRANSIT PVT. LTD. 2.
L&T MONORAIL CONSORTIUM OFFICE
NEAR WADALA RTO , NEAR ANIK BUS
DEPOT. WADALA EAST,MUMBAI- 400
087.
108 D. B. Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Geophysical & Geotechnical Works at India Tower II , 02.04.2009 18.40 15/04/09 5/6/2009 Onshore
Ruby Garage Compound, Next to petrol Mumbai.
pump, Maharshi Karve Road, Charni Road
(East), Mumbai- 400004.
109 Gateway Terminal India Private Ltd, Land Borehole investigation at RMGC Yeard. 29.12.08 3.00 8/1/2009 22/01/09 Onshore
GTI House, Jawaharlal Nehru Port, Sheva,
Navi Mumbai - 400 007.
110 Gujarat Pipavav Port , Land site geotechnical investion at Pipavav Port. IDAS/C:019/08:09 30.39 19/05/08 18/08/08 Onshore
Port of Pipavav, P. Bag 45, Post- Ucchaiya, dated 22.05.08
Via.- Rajula, Dist. Amreli, Gujarat- 365560.
111 Delhi International Airport (P) Ltd. T3, Pavement Coring DCPT for main runway of DIAL. 39758.00 19.62 15/06/08 14/08/08 Onshore
Project Office, Opp. ATS Complex, Near
Terminal 2 , Indira Gandhi International
Airport, New Delhi - 110037
112 Gateway Terminals of India Pvt. Ltd. Land borehole investigation at drain area at JNPT & state 15/07/08 8.76 6/8/2008 4/9/2008 Onshore
GTI House, Jawaharlal Nehru Port, Sheva, reclametion area .
Navi Mumbai - 400 007.
113 Vax Consultant Pvt. Ltd. Conducting Static Penetration Tests at Nellore, AP. VCPL/GEO/Chennai/2008/9 4.30 28/07/08 15/08/08 Onshore
No. 26/11, II street, Nagarjuna Narar, dated 26/07/08
Kodambakam, Chennai 600024.
114 L&T Bangalore Airport Geophysical Investigation Conducting HWD & 400199 dated 01/11/08 15.70 5/11/2008 30/11/08 Onshore
Banglore Investigation Airport Porject, P.Box determination of PCN at Banglore Airport.
No. 21, Devanahalli, Bangalore- 562110.
Page 155
Value of
NO. & Date. date
Lac
115 Indian Oil Corporation Limited. Geotechnical Site Investigation at Paradip Refinery LOA Dated 03-01-2008 138.32 27/12/2007 22/08/2008 Onshore
Refineries Division : Scope Complex, Core - Project (Tender No. : PDC07A002).
2, 7, Institutional area, Lodhi Road, New
Delhi - 110003.
116 GMR, Larsen & Toubro Ltd. L& T Chennai Conducting HWD and determination of PCN at W.O. No. 2161 Dt. 25.71 5/9/2008 15/10/2008 Onshore
House, 10, Club House Road, Anna Salai, Hyderabad Airport. 1/09/2008
Chennai - 600 002
117 Larsen & Toubro Ltd.ECC Division, Conducting HWD and Determination of PCN at Bangalore W.O. NO. 400199 Dt. 01-11- 17.64 5/11/2008 30/11/2008 Onshore
Bangalore International Airport Project, Post Airport. 2008
Box No. 21. Devanahalli, Bangalore -
562110
118 Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation Work for Design and W.O. No. SIIL/HO/KB-SY/08-09 28.44 20/09/2008 30/11/2008 Onshore
8, Bhavani Services Industrial Estate, 3rd construction of South and North Kasheli Bridge along with Dt 15-09-08
Floor, Opp. I.I.T. Main Gate, Powai, Mumbai -its approaches on Thane - Bhiwandi - Wadpa Road in
400076 Thane District.
119 Gammon India Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed Ennore W.O. no. GIPL-Dragados- 9.22 15/09/2008 15/11/2008 Onshore
Gammon House, Veer Savarkar Marg, Container Terminal project. Leighton/WO/25.08.2008
Prabhadevi, Mumbai - 400001
120 Gammon Infrastructure Projects Limited Geotechnical Investigation on Land portion at Barh STPP W.O. No. SC/YKM/G/2261/08 8.17 15/06/2008 14/08/2008 Pavement
Gammon House, Veer Savarkar Marg, ( 3x600MW) in Bihar. Dt. 12/08/2008 Investigation /
Prabhadevi, Mumbai - 400001 Onshore
121 Delhi International Airport (P) Ltd. Survey of Main Runway at IGI Airport, New Delhi. W.O. No. 5600000164 Dt. 36.20 15/06/2008 14/08/2008 Onshore
GMR 11.06.2008
T3, Project Office, Opp. ATS Complex, Near
Terminal 2 , Indira Gandhi International
Airport, New Delhi - 110037
122 Gujarat Pipavav Port Landside geotechnical Investigation at Pipavav Port. BHs W.O. IDAS/C-018/08/09 dated 32.00 19/05/2008 18/08/2008 On shore
Port of Pipavav, P. Bag No. 45, Post - 33 Nos up to depth 23m. 22/05/2008
Ucchaiya, Via Rajula, District -Amreli,
Gujarat - 365560.
123 IHI Corporation Soil Investigation for LNG Terminal at Kochi. BHs 11 Nos. LOI No. Nil Dated 07/03/2008 28.00 27/03/2008 17/05/2008 Offshore
1-1, Toyosu 3-chome, Koto-Ku, Tokyo - up to depth 80m depth, Rexox Potential Test 2 nos. ERT
1358710, Japan 2 Nos.
124 Gammon India Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation of Offshore Container SC/CMS/G/1900/07-8611/03 15.00 20/12/2007 27/12/2007 Onshore
Gammon House, Veer Savarkar Marg, Terminal at Mumbai Port. BHs 6 Nos. Depth upto 20m. dated 18/12/2007
Prabhadevi, Mumbai - 400001
125 Hazira Port Private Ltd, Via Surat, Hazira - Additional Soil Investigation for HPPL at Hazira. BHs 7 HPPL/206/07/01 dated 11.70 3/12/2007 18/12/2007 Onshore
394270 Nos upto depth 30m. 20/11/2007
126 DBM Geotechnics and Constructions Pvt. Carrying Out Pressure Meter Test at Kudankulam, Tamil QBM-07-Fugro dated 5.60 17/01/2007 22/01/2007 Onshore
Ltd. Nadu, Total 18 Nos. Pressure Meter Test. 21/03/2007
B/301, Centaur House, Shantinagar
Industrial Estate,Mumbai - 400055
127 Gujarat State Disaster Management Geotechnical Investigation for Seismic Microzonation for GSDMA/CEO/SM/01 dated 137.00 26/12/2006 10/7/2007 Onshore
Authority Gandhudham; Kutch; Gujarat. Scope of Work: Seismic Nov. 09, 2006
Bl- No. 11, 5th Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Sector Survey, PS Logging 12 nos. (Geophysical Test), BHs 53
- 11, Gandhinagar - 382011, Gujarat Nos. (depth uptyo 50m), BHs 12 nos. (depth 80m), BHs 3
nos. 100m depth, BHs 3 nos.
128 Cairn Energy India PTY Ltd., Geotechnical Services for Northern Area Development VO No. DECO-MRX-CN.CT- 243.00 15/11/2006 15/01/2008 On shore
3rd & 4th Floor, VIPUL Plaza, suncity, Mangala & Gageshwari Field in Block -RJ-ON-90/1. 0001-VO.03 dated 12.12.2007
Sector - 54, Gurgaon-122002, Haryana,
India.
129 Hazira Port Private Limited, Via Surat, Soil Investigation work at Hazira, 5 Nos. boreholes max W.O. No. HPPL/0206/07 dated 11.40 2/11/2007 15/12/2007 Onshore
Hazira-394270. 30m depth. 20/01/2007
130 India Gateway Terminals Pvt. Ltd., GTI Geotechnical Investigation for New Road work, DCPT-5 W.O. No. Nil dated 05/11/2007 2.50 8/11/2007 16/11/2007 On shore
House, JNPT Port, Sheva, Raigad Dist, nos. Trial pit-5 nos. and CBR 7 Nos.
Maharashtra.
131 Punj Lloyd, Geotechnical Investigation at Amba River in Wandkal, W.O. PLN/PDPL-II/01/07- 14.50 9/10/2007 13/11/2007 On Shore/ Near
Punj Lloye House, 17-18, Nehru Place, New Total 5 Nos. boreholes in river max 20 m depth and 5 08/Rev 0 dated 18/09/2007 shore
Delhi - 110019, India nos. in onshore max 15m depth.
132 Bhaba Atomic Research Centre, arch & Civil Geotechnical Investigation work for cUOCF and W.O. No. A & 27.00 1/4/2007 15/09/2007 On Shore
Engineering Division, Bhaba Atomic VWSF/NRGP at Kalpakkam. CED/NRGPK/BARCF/87/2006
Research Centre Facility, Kalpakkam - Dt. 27/03/2007
603102
133 Hazira Port Private Ltd, Via Surat, Hazira - Soil Investigation at Hazira total 12nos of boreholes W.O. No. Nil dated 22/3/07 30.00 24/03/2007 3/10/2007 On Shore
394270 maximumum depth 35m & 22 nos CPT test.
134 Goa Shipyard Ltd. Ground Investigation Work at Goa Shipyard Ltd.Total W.O.No.010/MODN/48/3890 95.00 20/10/2006 3/3/2007 On Shore/ Near
Vasco -Da- Gama, Goa:403802 work done Land Boreholes 19nos 40m depth( 91mm dia dt. 11/09/06 shore
Core), Marine boreholes 23nos 35m depth (101mm Dia
Core), 19nos Trial Pits, Vane Share Test 50 nos.
135 Larsen & Toubro Ltd. L& T Chennai House, Geo Technical Investigation works at LNG Cochin. Total LTCD:CNRO:LNG Cochin: 001 9.25 18/11/2006 23/11/2006 On shore
10, Club House Road, Anna Salai, Chennai -work done 5nos CPT, & 15nos Dissipation test. dt.28/11/06
600 002 Tel.No.28460046 .
136 Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Geo-Technical Investigation at FRFCF site at Ref.No. CED/IGC/Tr.585/2005- 148.00 3/6/2005 29/05/2008 On shore
Kalpakkam: 603 102, Tamil Nadu. Kalpakkam. Total 268 nos borehole maximum depth 50m WO dt. 19th May 05
and maximum core drilling 11,000m, Pressuremetre 200
bar 50 nos,ERT-6 nos, Packer test-40 nos, Cross hole
Test-6 nos.
137 India Getway Terminal Pvt. Ltd. IGT Ground Investigation at Vallarpadam (ICTT) Terminal Work Order Ref. No. nil dated 85.00 30/08/2006 15/11/2006 On shore/ Near
House, Container Terminal, Wiilngdon Works.Total Work 7nos Boreholes 40m depth, 2nos 17th Augest 2006 shore
Island, Kochi:682003, India, Tel: 91+484- boreholes 50m depth, 5nos boreholes 72m depth in land.
4080234, & Marine boreholes 5nos 40m depth & 6nos. 15m depth.
CPT 17nos & Vane shear test 40 nos.
138 Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co. Soil Investigation for LNG Petronet, Kochi , 2nos PLL/EPC ( CO ) 1-011/K-57 11.00 1/8/2006 20/08/2006 On shore
Ltd., 1-1 Toyosu 3-Chome, Koto-Ku, Tokyo Borehole maximum depth 80m each. dated 18-07-06
135-8710, Japan
139 New Mangalore Port Trust, Department of Soil Investigation for development of Western Dock Arm W.O. No. 3/1/SSI- 22.00 25/02/2006 20/06/2006 On shore / Near
Civil Engineering, DDGB Division, at New Mangalore Port,Marine Bore holes 5nos at 20m WD/DDGB/2005-06/TS dated shore with
Panambur - 575010, Mangalore. depth,land boreholes 32nos maximum 40m minimum 24-1-2006 Pontoon
20m depth.
Page 156
Value of
NO. & Date. date
Lac
140 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Isotope Geotechnical investigation work for DAE township ar Ref. No. 5.49 25/01/2006 22/02/2006 On shore / Near
Application Division, Trombay, Mumbai -400 Kalpakkam. Total 10nos bore hole at 40m depth in A&CED?NRGPK?BARCF/68/20 shore with
085 channl . Work doen with pontoon. 05/ dated1/12/05 Pontoon
141 Fugro Geoscience Co. Ltd, Sanlain, 14 Geotechnical Investigation for LNG Terminal at Ref. No. IHI10/18/05JK 25.00 27/01/2005 13/02/2006 On shore
Building 4-3-16, Kudan-Kita Chiyoda - Ku Dahej.10nos boreholes 50m deth, Redox Potential Test- dated 18/10/05
,Tokyo, Japan. 2nos, ERT-2nos, Piezo Electric Cone Test-8nos,Seismic
Cross Hol Test-2nos.
142 Kirloskar Broyhers Limited, "Chintan" Soil Investigation work for GEB Project 10nos boreholes Ref. No. Proj/Pur/GEB/LOI/183 1.50 27/01/2006 11/2/2006 On shore
408/15, Mukund Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra - 15m depth. dated 11/01/06
411 037 Tel. 020 24440770
143 Clough Engineering Limited, Oil & Gas Soil Investigation Onshore processing Terminal - Ref. No. Nil 8.00 8/3/2005 25/04/2005 On shore
Division, Ground Floor, 22 Mount Street, Odalarevu, Amallapuram, AP,4nos Boreheoles at 30m dated 28/2/2005
Perth, Wester Australia 6000 depth, Stand Pipe 3nos,TP-4nos, Cross Hole Test 1no,
Borrow Pit - 11nos, 1no ERT, 2nos PLT, 5nos ECPT 20T.
144 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Isotope Borehole instrumentation work to be carried out at IARI Ref.No .IAD/CRP/ 0.70 22/02/2005 27/02/2005 On shore
Application Division, Trombay, Mumbai -400 Farm, New Delhi 2nos Boreholes 6" dia 11m depth . dated 14-2-05
085
145 Vanoord Ballast Ham Dredging B V, 6th Onshore Soil Investigation at Hope Island off Kakinada Ref.No.M861/TpOut?091- 2.45 28/01/2005 4/2/2005 On Shore
Floor, Sanghvi Udyan, B-18, Vaikundnthlal Coast total Borehole 4nos at 15m depth. 04/F/JGL dated 13-1-
Metha Road, J.V.P.T Scheme, Mumbai 400 05
049.
146 The Senior Project Engineer ®, Bhabha Geotechnical Investigation for project CFB at North Site, Ref. No. A&CED/CFB/10/6578 5.57 11/1/2005 20/05/2005 On Shore
Atomic Research Centre, Arch & Civil Engg. BARC, Trombay Total 5nos borehole 40m depth, 16 nos dated 27-12-04
Division, Trombay, Mumbai 400085 200 bar Pressuremetre test, 1no Cross hole test.
147 Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited, Central Soil Investigation along with 56 KM Pipeline corridor from Ref. No. 3.67 12/12/2004 15/01/2005 On shore
Technical Offices, Block-1, Neyveli - 607 IG canal to Thermal Power Plant. TM/IV/Nomination/CGM/C/2004
801, The Dy. General Manager, Phone No.
04142 252219.
148 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Isotope Geoteechnical Investigation for project CFB at North Gate Ref. No. a& 5.57 12/1/2005 19/05/2005 On Shore
Application Division, Trombay, Mumbai -400 at BARC. ced/ cfb/ 10 / 6578
085 Dated 27/12/04
149 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Isotope Geotechnical Investigation for RLG project North site Ref. CE/Q/1595/3856 3.50 11/9/2004 30/10/2004 On shore
Application Division, Trombay, Mumbai -400 BARC.
085
150 Gateway Terminal India Private Limited, Geotechnical Investigation for Bulk Terminal at JNPT. Ref.No. Nil dated 08/09/2004 14.50 22/09/2004 4/11/2004 On shore / Near
11th Flor, CG House, Dr. Annie Besunt Total 6nos Boreholes in water,9nos in land approx.20m shore
Road, Worli Colony, Mumbai 400 030 Tel. depth, TP-15nos, LDCPT 10 nos,SCPT-12nos, Vane
24337946 shear test .
151 M. Pallonji & Co. Private Limited, 46/A, Soil Investigation for coal Berth at Tata Power Station, REF. No. PKM/P/2397/04-05 3.50 4/9/2004 21/9/2004 On shore
Cawasji Patel Street, Fort, Mumbai 400 001. 5nos land boreholes 15m depth, 5nos marine boreholes dated 31-8-04.
Tel 22042432, Mr. P.K. Mistry. 5m below BL.
152 Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited, Central Geotechncial Investigation for Barsingsar Thermal Power Ref. No. ATM IV / 7.85 16/07/2004 9/9/2004 On shore
Technical Offices, Block-1, Neyveli - 607 Station (2 x 125 MW) at Barsingsar. T.N.62/2003/CGM/C/2004
801, The Dy. General Manager, Phone No. dated. 13-5-04
04142 252219.
153 Essar Constructions Limited,Essar House, Geotechnical Investigation for HDD Crossing River 2 in Ref, No, 10.50 3/6/2004 13/07/2004 On shore / River
Mahalaxmi, Mumbai - 400 034 Tel 2495 orissa & 1 in Chattisgarh-Bailadila Slurry Pipeline Project. ECL / BVSPL / GTS /01 dated crossing
0606 24-5-04.
154 PUNJ LLOYD LTD. Shell Hazira LNG Soil Investigation for Second Cryogenic LPG Tank at Ref. No. PLL/LNG/LOI/044 3.05 5/3/2004 23/03/2004 On shore
Project, Taluka. Choriyasi, Hazira , Dist. Jamnagar. dated 29-3-04.
Surat, Gujarat
155 Vikram Ispat, Geotechnical Investigation for Compressor Hose Ref.No. 1.50 11/2/2004 17/02/2004 On shore
Vill. Salav, Via Revdanda Sub P.O. Dist., Structure. 2nos boreholes & Cross Hole Test. EDL/5900000468
Raigad - 402202, Maharashtra. dated 7-2-04
156 Nhava Sheva International Container Geotechncial Invstigation at NSICT, 5nos borehoels upto Ref. No. Nil 1.30 9/1/2004 29/1/2004 On shore
Terminal Pvt. Ltd. Operation Centre, Sheva, 15m, Vane Share Test 2nos. dated 23-1-04
Navi Mumbai 400707
157 International Metro Civil Contractors, Ground Investigation from Amar Cinema to New Delhi W.O. No. 5.50 3/5/2004 25/05/2004 On shore
8, Jantar Mantar Marg, Near Connaught station for the NATM work. WO/20/758/0
Place, New Delhi 110 001. dated24-02-04
158 BSES Limited, Geotechnical Investigation works for Combined Cycle Ref. No. 3.25 6/1/2004 29/02/2004 On shore
BSES House,Santacruz (E), Mumbai 400 Power project at Nagothane. GEN-NGT/CIVIL/002 dated 22-
055. 9-03.
159 GAIL (India) Limited, Geotechnical Investigation and Hydrgraphic survey work Ref. No. 88.00 16/11/2003 15/01/2004 On Shore/ Near
B-35,36, Sector-1,NOIDA 201301 for GAIL's Dahej-Uran Natural Gas Pipeline Project.Total FOI.No.GAIL/NOIDA/C%P/DUP shore
115 nos Boreholes Maximum depth 15m in 30 River L/03-279/C-413, dated 10-11-03
Crossing (Gujarat & Maharashtra).
160 Chemical Terminal Trombay Limited, Tata Geotechnical Investigation work for Tankage expansion Ref. No. 3.00 20/10/2003 18/11/2003 On shore
Vidyut Karyalaya, Murzban Road, Mumbai project.7nos Boreholes upto 20m depth, Vane shear Test CTTL-GT/EXPN-001 dated 17-
400 001. 1no, ERT -7nos, Permeability Test 2nos,Trial Pit- 1no, 10-03.
Packer Test 4nos.
161 Punj Lloyd Ltd., Geotechnical Investigation for Narmada Main Canal, Ref. No. 5.25 25/05/2003 22/06/2003 On shore
Punj Lloyd House, 17-18, Nehru Place, New Gujarat. PLL/PROJ/PIND01/DVPL-1/01
Delhi-110 001. dated 16th May 2003
162 Gujarat Adani Port Ltd., Adani House, Geotechnical Investigation & Topographical Onshore Ref. No. 6.50 12/5/2003 4/6/2003 On shore
Shrimali Society, Nr. Mithakhali Six Road, Pipe Line Route Survey10nos Boreholes depth up to 30m GAPL/IOCL/GTOS/14/03 dated
Navarangapura, Ahmedabad -380 004 , ERT-7nos & 6.8Km. Survey. 24/4/03.
163 Reliance Industries Limited , On shore Terminal Soil Investigation - Kakinada Terminal Ref.W.O. 14.00 24/03/2003 25/04/2003 On shore
Oil & Gas Division, RPL House, 115, 17nos Boreholes 30m to 40m, SCPT 17nos, Field Vane No.OG3/3528281, dated 24-3-
Walchand Hirachand Marg, Ballard Estate, Shear17nos, ERT 17nos,PLT-4nos,BVT-4nos, 03
Fort, Mumbai - 400 001.
164 International Metro Civil Contractor (IMCC) Soil Investigation works for Delhi Metro Rail Corridor Ref. No. IMCC/MC1B/514 dt. 81.54 25/07/2001 31/12/2002 On shore
5, Bhikaji Cama Place, Som Dutt Contract Package - MC1B- Total 57nos Probing holes of 16/7/01
Chambers1, 3rd Floor,R.K. Puram, New 25 to 35m depth.
Delhi - 110 066.
165 Punj Lloyd Ltd., Geotechnical Invesigation for river crossing at Ref. No. PLN/GAIL/2K2/41 3.25 24/05/2002 18/06/2002 On shore
Punj Lloyd House, 17-18, Nehru Place, New Amalapuram to 7nos borehole 30m depth. dated 14-5-2002
Delhi-110 001.
Page 157
Value of
NO. & Date. date
Lac
166 National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd, Conducting Seismic Test, Cross-Hole Test at Khalgaon, Ref. No. C-27/41921/2435/6260 7.00 10/1/2002 27/01/2002 On shore
STPP, Plant Area, Kahalg Stpp. Stage-II 2x660 MW. dated. 4/1/2002
167 Gujarat Pipavav Port Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation at Pipavav Port Total Land Ref. W.O. No. ENG/029/01-02 71.00 1/12/2001 Field work Near shore / On
Pipavav House, 209 Bank Street Cross Boreholes 41nos, Marine Boreholes 25nos 50m depth, dated 13-11-01 completed on shore
Lane, Off S.B. Road, Fort Mumbai - 400 6nos CPT.Approx. 800m soil boring & 300m rock drilling. 20/02/2002
023
168 Chennai Container Terminal Ltd. Chennai Geotechnical Investigation at Chennai Container Ref. No. Nill dated 28/12/2001 12.00 22/12/2001 28/01/2002 On shore
Port Trust, Gate "O" Royapuram,Chennai - Terminal, 11nos Boreholes 30m depth, 8nos CPT, 12nos
600 013. DCPT, 10nos TP.
169 KSHI J.V., Electric Cone Penetration Test for Delhi Metro, New Ref. No.05/OW/CA/2748 dated 9.00 25/10/2001 6/11/2001 On shore
Oberoi Maidens, 7, Sham Nath Marg, New Delhi. Total 12nos CPT. 24/9/2001
Delhi 100 054
170 ABG Goa Port Ltd., Geotechnical Investigation of proposed berth 5A&6A Ref. 0.84 23/06/2001 13/07/2001 On shore
5th Floor,Bhupati Chambers, 13 Rathew 4nos boreholes 15m depth. W.O.ABG/SDDG/G,102/04/01
Road, Mumbai 400 004. dt. 9-5-01.
171 MSW Power (India) Limited, D- Soil Investigation for Deonar Project total 4nos borehole Ref. MSW/M-0012/008 dt. 22-6- 2.25 4/7/2001 20/08/2001 On shore
73/1,TTC Industrial Area, MIDC Turbhe, 20m depth, 1no field CBR, 2nos DCPT, 6nos ERT. 01.
New Mumbai 400 705.
172 Gujarat Adani Port Ltd., Static Cone Penetration Test 10T capacity total 63nos. Ref. No. G/Proj/02G- 3.75 18/05/2001 29/07/2001 On shore
Adani House, Shrimali Society, Nr. 002/04/1391 dt. 23/4/001
Mithakhali Six Road, Navarangapura,
Ahmedabad -380 004
173 Cairn Energy India Pty. Limited, Wellington Additional Soil Investigation Survey for CB/OS-2 Onshore Ref. No. 2000-165 Rev0/FG- 7.00 18/10/2001 22/10/2001 On shore
Plaza, 2nd Floor, 90, Anna Salai, Chennai- Terminal, 5nos Boreholes 25m depth. L0289 rgc/2001 dated. 15-10-
600 002, India. 2001.
174 International Metro Civil Contractor (IMCC)

Soil Investigation works for Delhi Metro Rail Corridor Ref. No. MCIB/SC/SI/010227/1 78.00 4/3/2001 Field work On shore
5, Bhikaji Cama Place, Som Dutt Contract Package - MC1B- Total 32nos boreholes of 25 dated 27/2/2001 completed on
Chambers1, 3rd Floor,R.K. Puram, New to 45m depth,ECPT 34nos, Packer Test 20nos, 31/05/2001
Delhi - 110 066. Permeability test 40nos , Piezometer Installation
30nos.Approximately 600m soil boring and 350m rock
drilling.
175 Toyo Engineering India Ltd. Soil Investigation for LNG Terminal Dahej total 8nos Ref. No. TH/FK/6180/001 dated 31.00 5/2/2001 Field work On shore
Toyo House, LBS Marg, Kanjurmarg (West) boreholes 40m deep, 1no 125m deep,1 No. 65m deep 31-1-2001 completed on
Mumbai 400 078 ERT test, Cross-Hole test, Redox Potential Test, Thermal 15/03/2001
Conductivity test, 20T ECPT 10 Nos., PLT test,
Pressuremeter test, Piezometer Installation .
176 Cairn Energy India Pty. Limited, Wellington Geo-Technical Survey services Block CB-OS/2 Ref. No 2000-179 Rev0/FG- 16.00 7/1/2001 25/01/2001 On shore
Plaza, 2nd Floor, 90, Anna Salai, Chennai- development at Hazira, 9nos Boreholes 25m deep, ECPT L0338 bnn/2000 dated
600 002, India. 20T 9nos, Vane Test 1no. 29/12/2000
177 Cairn Energy India Pty. Limited, Wellington Geotechnical Investigation Ravva Saellite Gas Ref. No. 154/00 dt. 9/9/00 of 2.50 12/10/2000 20/10/2000 On shore
Plaza, 2nd Floor, 90, Anna Salai, Chennai- development Project , Amalapuram, 1no Boreholes 60m fugro geonics.
600 002, India. depth.
178 Maitreya Project International Site Investigation for Maitreya Project Bodhgaya, Bihar. Ref. No Nill dated 10-5-2000 53.00 20/05/2000 Field work On shore
MPI Administration Office , 1001 EA 1no Borehole 60m depth, 2nos Boreholes 50m depth, completed on
Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7nos boreholes 40m depth, 30nos ECPT & Seismic cone 24/06/2000
test, 9nos Permeability test, 32 nos Trial Pits, 9nos
Piezometer installation.Approximately 140m
179 National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd, Geotechnical Investigation for Sipat Super Thermal Ref. No. SIPAT/M&CS/OT/98- 1.89 16/11/2000 5/12/2000 On shore
Sipat Super Thermal Power Project, SECL Power Project, 5nos borehole 20m depth. 99/001. Dt.5/4/99
Complex, Sipat Road, Bilaspur.
180 Jaypee Rewa Cement, Geotechnical Investigation for proposed 25 MW Thermal Ref. No. JRC/HO:99514/2000 3.00 25/04/2000 30/05/2000 On shore
Jaypee Nagar, Rewa Dist. - 486450, MP. power plant Jaypee Nagar, 2nos Boreholes 20m dated 7/4/2000
depth,4nos boreholes 10m depth, 12nos DCPT, 4nos
Trial Pits, 2nos Cross-hole survey.
181 Engineers India Limited, Geotechnical Investigation for Strategic Crude Oil Ref No. 4560/T-82/03 A III 45.00 31/01/2000 7/6/2000 On shore
Engineers India Bhavan, 1, Bhikaiji Cama Storage Site Part- A III (Visag) 4nos Boreholes 120m dated 11/1/2000
Place, New Delhi - 110 065 depth, 2nos 180m depth, 2nos Paker Test, 2nos Pump
out Test.
182 Gannon Dunkerley & Co, Ltd, Plate Load Test for Wartsila NSD India Ltd working Site Ref. B;CE:CW: 4928 dated 3-2- 1.30 3/2/2000 17/03/2000 On shore
Bombay Mutual Annexe, Rustom Sidhwa 10 nos PLT. 2000.
Marg, Fort, Mmbai 400 001.
183 Sanska International Geophysical Testing for Feasibility study for the proposed Ref. No. 9.70 23/01/2000 28/1/2000 On shore
Civil Engineering underground Oil Storage project at Mora . Seismic Test SSA/MC/2`15/108/055/2000 07/05/2000 09/05/2000
AB, 412 - 413, International Trade Tower, 2000m, ERT- 8 lines 0 - 200mtr. & 2lines 200-300mtr., dated 13-1-2000.
New Delhi - 110019 9nos Cross-hole Test.
184 National Environmental Engineering Geophysical Investigation,Drilling of boreholes, Ref. No. PUR- 43.00 9/12/1999 22/07/2000 On shore
Research Institute, Installation of monitoring wells at Bichhri Village Near 132/EP/TWM/Tender?99/330
Nehru Marg, Nagpur - 440 020, India Udaipur. 43nos boreholes with Installation of monitoring dated 30-9-99
wells, 40 nos ERT, Electeomagnetic Survey.
185 ABB Alstom Power India Ltd, Chandiwala Geotechnical Investigation work for north Chennai Ref. No. IBY/NMD/34C/PSP- 13.50 13/11/1999 20/02/2000 On shore
Estate, Maa Anand Mai Ashram Marg, Thermal Power project 41 nos boreholes 30m depth , SM/0002. Dated 12-10-99
Kalkaji, New Delhi 110 019. 4nos CPLT, 9nos DCPT, 5nos ERT, 2nos Cross-hole
test, 1no Pressuremetre test, 7nos CBR.
186 Besix Dabhol S.A., Geotechnical Incvestigation Jetty and Quarry for New Ref. No. DAB/2.0/MD/5164 13.00 31/12/1999 16/03/1999 On shore
53,54, Kaipataru Court, Choitram Gidwani LNG Terminal at Dabhol. 12nos boreholes 45m depth. dated 21/12/99
Road, Chembur, Mumbai 400 074
187 Hyundai Engineering & Const. Co. Ltd. , Geotechnical Investigation works peddapuram 360 Ref. No PED-HAF-002 dated 5.00 20/10/1999 29/11/1999 On shore
Hyundai Jeonja Building , 66 Jeokson- Combined Cycle Power Plant. 13nos boreholes 15m 7/10/99
Dong, Chongro- Ku, Seoul 110052 depth, 4nos ERT, 2nos Cross-hole test, 2nos PLT.
188 Toshiba Plant Kensetsu(India)Pvt. Ltd. , Geotechnical Investigation for 2x260MW Thermal Power Ref. No. QPTRAM 1002 dated 31.00 13/06/1999 15/09/1999 On shore
A-1 Module, D- Quadrant, 2nd floor, Hitec Plant at Ramagundam for BPL, total 117 nos boreholes 27-4-99
city, Madhupur, Hydrabad 500 033 30m depth, 8nos CPLT, 40nos ERT, 3nos Pump out test,
8nos DCPT, 4nos BVT, 30nos CBR.
189 Bovis India Pvt. Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation for JNPT, Nhava Sheva, Ref. No. BOV/MC/GEN/7/01 1.50 12/6/1999 15/06/1999 On shore
NSICT- Bovis Project office, Jawaharlal NSICT Project Uran, 1no borehole 30m septh. dated 18-5-99
Port, Uran.
Page 158
Value of
NO. & Date. date
Lac
190 Gujarat Pipavav Port Ltd. Geotechncial Investigation for Pipavav port at Ref. No. GPPL/WO/039/99 4.00 27/05/1999 26/06/1999 On shore
Pipavav House, 209 Bank Street Cross Pipava4nos boreholes 30m depth dated 14/5/99
Lane, Off S.B. Road, Fort Mumbai - 400
023
191 B. Mehtalia Consultant Pvt. Ltd., 807 Geotechnical investigation for Pharmaceutical Plant for Ref. No. Nill dated 22/6/99 2.20 20/06/1999 26/07/1999 On shore
Imperial Mahal, 3rd Floor, Khodadad Circle, M/s Zydus Byk Ltd. Thane Belapur Road , Navi Mumbai,
Dader T.T. , Mumbai - 400 023 4nos boreholes 29m depth, 2nos PLT.
192 Wartsila Nsd India Ltd, Geotechnical Investigation for 120 MW Power Plant at Ref. No. PP/Pr/WR/426 dated 4.00 1/4/1999 27/04/1999 On shore
Power Plant, Neco Chamber 48, Sector-11, Ratlam, MP. 12nos boreholes 15m depth, 5nos ERT, 12/3/99
CBD Belapur , Navi Mumbai 400 614 Cross-hole Test.
193 Indian Tube Mills & Metal India Ltd., L.B. Geo technical Investigation for Double wall storage Tank Ref. No 4.00 16/09/1999 8/10/1999 On shore
Shastri Marg, Vikhroli, Mumbai - 400 083. GCPTL, Terminal Dahej. 6nos boreholes 40m depth. ITM/Fugro/GCPTL/STV/WO/01
dated 4/9/98
194 Tata Consulting Engineers., Geotechnical Investigation for Terminal Facility at Ref. No 50C91N007 dated 14.00 27/11/1998 2/1/1999 On shore
414, Veer savarkar Marg, Prabhadevi, Trombay , Mumbai. 21 nos boreholes 20m depth, Seismic 17/11/98
Mumbai - 400 025. test, Packer Test
195 Delhi Metro Rail Corridor., Geotechncial Investigation for Delhi Metro Rail Project Ref. No. Nill, 29/10/98 17.00 03/11/0998 15/03/1999 On shore
NBCC Place, Bhishma Pitamah Marg., New Delhi, 17nos boreholes 30m depth, Pressuremeter
Pragati Vihar, New Delhi 110 003. test, ECT, PLT.
196 Enron Engineering & Construction Off Shore & On Shore Geotechnical Investigation for 500 Ref. No. Nill dated 5/8/98 42.00 16/08/1998 13/11/1998 On shore / Near
Company, MW Power Plant Enron International Kannur, Kerala, shore
P.O. Box 4283-3AC, Houston, TX 77210 - India, 8nos boreholes 40m depth in land, 7nos boreholes
4283. 25m depth in water with Pontoon.
197 Bhageeratha Engineering Limited , 302/3. Soil Improvement & Creek investigation Second Basen Ref. No. BEL/BCBP:C31: 1.20 3/4/1998 30/04/1998 On shore
Twin Complex - 1, Opp Fire Brigade, Maroli, Beidge Nh-8, Mumbai. 2/9/98. Dated 7/4/98
Andehri(E), Mumbai 400 059.
198 Deutsche Babcock Anlagen GMBH Geotechnical Investigation for Essar Oil Power Plant Ref. No. BM NO.397314 dated 5.00 23/03/1998 5/4/1998 On shore
39, TTK Road, Alworpet, Chennai- 600 018. Vadinar. 8nos boreholes15m depth. 18-2-98
199 Shell India Production Development B.V., Soil Invesstigation for proposed Drilling Platform at Ref. No. OM-1998-0005/L 2.60 25/02/1998 13/03/1998 On shore
Tolstoy House, 3rd Floor, Tolstoy Marg, New Rajasthan. 8nos boreholes 10m depth, 2nos PLT. dated 17-2-98
Delhi 600 018.
200 Punj Lloyd Ltd., Geotechnical Investigation for Dabhol Phase I, II & III Ref No. Nill dated 7-2-98 17.00 20/02/1998 11/6/1998 On shore
Punj Lloyd House, 17-18, Nehru Place, New LNG Terminal. 35nos boreholes 30m depth.
Delhi-110 001.
201 Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd., Geotechnical Investigation for 2x40 MW Coal based Ref. No. LSIL-CPP-WO-006 5.00 27/01/1998 14/03/1998 On shore
Lloyds House, 954, Appsahab Marathe Captive Power Plant at Talegaon, Wardha, Nagpur. 15 dated 9-12-97
Marg, Prabhadevi, nos boreholes 20m depth, ERT, PLT, including Survey
Mumbai - 400 025.
202 Ispact Industries Ltd., Soil Investigation for basement +22 stories building Ref. No. 4.00 28/01/1998 11/3/1998 On shore
71-75, Malabar hill peddar Road, Mumbai, 4nos of boreholes Nil
20m depth, Seismic Test. dated 12-1-98
203 Reliance Power Limited , Geotechnical Investigation CFB Power Project at Ref. No. RX/W/330 dated 6.00 25/11/1997 5/1/1998 On shore
Shreeram Mills Compound, 2nd Floor, Jamnagar, Gujrat. 13nos boreholes 15m depth, Cross- 15/10/97
Ganpatrao Kadam hole test, 5nos ERT.
204 Lend Lease Design & Construct India Pvt. Soil investigation for Coca-Cola project at Vijayawada . Ref. No. 1BM-CCC-India Loi, 5.00 7/10/1997 4/11/1997 On shore
Ltd. 10nos boreholes 20m depth, ERT test. Fugro dated
C-DBS House, 26, Cunningham road, 28-7-98
Bangalore- 560052
205 Vikram Ispact Limited, Soil investigation for proposed Tank foundation at Savla, Ref. No. DRI/0002/97- 1.75 23/09/1997 8/10/1997 On shore
9th Floor, Sarkhar Bhavan, Nariman Point, Maharastra. 4 nos boreholes 15m depth, cross-hole test. 98 dated 17-9-97
Mumbai 400 021
206 Animal Health Ltd, Biological E. Limited, Soil Investigation near Hyderabad 20nos boreholes 0.5m Ref. No. Nil 1.65 30/07/1997 8/8/1997 On shore
18/1, & 3, Azamabad, Hyderabad 500 020, to 2m depth by hand Auger. dated 29/7/97
AP
207 Indo Rama Cement Limited., Soil Investigation for Slag Grinding Plant at Khar Karvi at Ref. No.IRCL/FUGRO/97 dated 2.00 28/04/1997 15/05/1997 On shore
207, Vardhaman Chambers, Sector-17, Pen. 4nos boreholes 20m depth. 30/4/97
Vashi, Navi Mumbai - 400 705
208 Global Foundation Trust., Soil Investigation for Buddhaweep pagoda project gorai Ref. No. Nil 1.35 30/09/1997 25/11/1997 On shore
Green House, 2nd Floor, Green Street, Fort, village,near Essel World, Borivali, 5nos borehole 20m dated 29/9/97
Mumbai - 400 013 depth , Seismic Test, Packer Test.
209 Ashapura International Ltd, Geotechnical Investigation for Mundra Jetty, Gujarat, FKG/AMIL/97-98 dated 18-2-97 1.25 12/3/1997 15/04/1997 On shore
81/82, Mittal Court, C-wing, Nariman Point, 3nos borehole 40m depth.
Mumbai 400 021
210 Occidental Of Bamgladesh Ltd, Engineering Investigation at the Moulavi, Bazaar Blowout Ref. No. Nil 3.00 19/08/1997 20/08/1997 On shore
Lake View 12, Road, 137 Gulshan, Dhaka- in Bangladesh. dated 18/8/97
1212 Bangladesh.
211 Tata Project Limited, Soil Invstigation for Installation of Gas Lift Compression Ref. No. TPL/488/501 4.00 22/02/1997 19/04/1997 On shore
Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai at CPF, Gandhar for ONGC. 15nos boreholes 16m depth, dated 12/2/97
400 013 5nos ERT, 4nos BVT, 3nos PLT.
212 City Industrial Development Corp., CIDCO Soil investigation for proposed Nhava Sheva Railway Ref. No. CIDCI/T&C/EE(TP 14.00 17/05/1997 30/11/1997 On shore
Bhavan, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 Complex on Nerul-Uran , 35nos boreholes 20m depth. IV)/062/012/480 dated 25/6/97
614
213 City Industrial Development Corp., CIDCO Soil Investigation for proposed Ranjanpada station Ref. No. CIDCO/T&C/EE ( 13.00 25/04/1997 31/12/1997 Onshore
Bhavan, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 complex on Nerul& Belapur-Uran. 34 nos boreholes 25m TP IV)/ 062 /014/479 dated
614 depth. 25/6/97
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
FUGRO GEOTECH PVT. LTD. -ru GRD
FUGRO HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT POLICY
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED is committed to provide a healthy and safe
workplace for all people at each work location and to protect the environment in accordance with
applicable laws and our HSE Policy. Our commitment is based on the conviction that accidents are
preventable. In order to achieve this objective, we will identify HSE risks arising out of our activities
and reduce them to as low as is reasonably practicable.
Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) responsibilities are integrated in the way in which FUGRO
GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED conducts its business. Successfully managing HSE issues is an
essential component of our business strategy. Through observance and encouragement of this policy
we assist in protecting the environment and the overall well-being of all our stakeholders, specifically
our employees, clients, subcontractors, and communities.
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED'S management will continue to take a proactive approach
towards creating safe working environments for all employees and will be accountable for promoting
continued safety education and training for all employees, assigning responsibility for all aspects of
the HSE Policy, continuously reviewing potential areas of improvement, and ensuring thorough
evaluations of all incidents.
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED will continue to address the environment and health impact
of our operations by reducing waste, emissions, and discharges and by using energy efficiently. We
strive to be good citizens in every community in which we operate.
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED will facilitate implementation of the HSE Policy by having a
Fugro HSE Management System. This System aims at continual improvement of HSE performance
through definition of roles and responsibilities at all levels in the organization and an efficient
communication structure. This HSE Management System is consistent with the Fugro Business
Principles, whereby, operating companies handle their operations in accordance with instructions and
guidance from Fugro NV
In this way we aim to foster a HSE performance of which we can be proud, to earn the
confidence of customers, shareholders and SOCiety at large and to enable sustained growth
and development.
(~~
Managing Director
Page 163
FUGRO GEOTECH PVT. LTD. r CRD
QUALITY POLICY
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED is a part of worldwide Fugro Group providing services on
collection and interpretation of data related to the Earth's surface, seabed and the soil and rock
beneath. FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED's activities are carried out allover India, onshore
and nearshore, and are primarily aimed at providing advice to the oil and gas, construction and mining
industries. These are achieved by providing high quality innovative services through professional and
specialized employees by using advanced state-of-the-art equipment and systems.
It is the policy of FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED to maintain a Quality Management System
that ensures that all the activities are carried out in a manner that meets or exceeds the requirements
agreed with the client. This policy means that we are all committed to:
• Gaining, fully documenting and understanding our clients' needs

• Communicating these needs to all those who will be working to meet them
• Ensuring that the work is performed in a manner that actually meets or exceeds those
requirements
• Maintaining records as evidence that those needs have been met
In order to achieve the above objectives, FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVA TE LIMITED will conduct data
collection, sampling and testing in a manner compatible to internationally accepted good practices,
local regulations and in accordance with the standard methods and requirements of its customers at
all times. The Quality Management System is based upon, and designed to support, the requirements
of international standards, such as BS EN ISO 9001 :2008. The Quality Management System is
mandatory for all FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED's employees and will be applied to all areas
of operation.
The company is committed to a philosophy of total quality and continuous improvement based on
periodic reviews in order to conform to the changing needs of the industry and the customers.
FUGRO GEOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED recognizes the need to maintain employees' awareness of
quality assurance. It is the policy of the company to monitor and review constantly the training
requirements of all its employees to enhance their knowledge of, and contribution to, the company's
Quality Management Systems.
(~Q_
Santanu MOitra, Date: 01 May 2015
Managing Director
Page 164
SUB CONTRACTOR POLICY
It is the policy of Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. to provide a safe and healthy work environment for the
employees of contractors and subcontractors. Contractors and subcontractors, who work on Fugro's
projects, must conduct their activities in a manner consistent with safe and healthy operating
practices, and in accordance with all-applicable safety and health rules and regulations.
REQUIREMENTS
(a) Fuqro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. will consider the HSE program and record of contractors and
subcontractors, during the selection process. At Fugro request, contractors and
subcontractors may be required to provide, their current HSE incident rates, and/or such other
information as determined by Fugro to be necessary or desirable to judge their prior safety
records.
(b) It is the primary responsibility of each contractor and subcontractor to provide a safe and
healthy workplace for his or her employees. All contractors and subcontractors must perform
their work in accordance with all applicable local and national governmental regulations as
well as the HSE policies and procedures of Fugro or Fugro's clients.
(c) All contractors and subcontractors shall provide their employees with appropriate medical
examinations, personal protective equipment and the necessary HSE training prior to
beginning work.
(e) All contractors and subcontractors are responsible for ensuring that their equipment is in
proper working condition and that any unsafe conditions shall be immediately corrected.
(f) All contractors and subcontractors will conduct safety meetings for their employees or have
their employees attend Fugro safety meetings as well as monitor their work activities to help
ensure safe working practices and conditions. The contractor must document each safety
meeting, stating the time, place, subject discussed, and include each employee's signature.
(g) All contractors and subcontractors are responsible to notify a Fugro supervisor immediately
on all accidents involving their employees on Fugro's projects.
(h) All contractors must comply with the Fugro HSE Policy and communicate it to their
employees.
(i) Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. reserves the right to audit/inspect contractors HSE program,
equipment, and operations both before and during the work.
IMPLEMENTATION
(a) Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. HSE Manager has been designated as primarily responsible for
implementing this policy.
(b) If a contractor or its subcontractors violates this policy, then the contractor and lor
subcontractor shall take prompt action to correct such violation or to correct any hazard.
Violation of this Policy, or any applicable policy of a Fugro client, or of any applicable government
regulation may be cause for immediate removal and revocation of access by the offending person to
any Fugro or client property.
~~
Managing Director
Page 165
~GRD
SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLlCY
This policy is applicable to all the staff and employees of Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. and "all other
personnel which includes full time, part time and temporary agency workers and all subcontractors.
Substance Abuse is an acknowledged hazard arising out of consumption of Drugs, Alcohol, Solvents
and other substances. Personnel who are under the influence of Drugs, Alcohol, Solvents and other
substances pose a danger not only to themselves but also to others. Any individual under such
influence whilst on duty, at any of the work location or elsewhere, shall be considered as committing a
serious breach of discipline.
The policy covers the Substance Abuse and applies to all staff and employees of Fugro Geotech
Pvt. Ltd. The Department Heads and Senior Managers are to ensure the following:
• Ensure that the consumption of Drugs, Alcohol, Solvent and other substances is strictly
prohibited in the office and in work site.
• Ensure that the staff and employees working in the office and sites are made aware of the risk
to health and safety, if under the influence of drugs and alcohol.
• Needs to be proactive in monitoring compliance and taking appropriate disciplinary action

where necessary.
• To prevent Drugs and alcohol misuse, identify personnel with a problem at an early stage and
provide assistance. Provide for counseling and rehabilitation and return to effective work.
• Where there are conflicting requirements between client policies, local laws and regulation
and Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. policies, the most stringent control will apply.
Code of conduct (For Staff Assignments)
• All employees on assignment to projects are considered in the care, custody and control of
Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. and represent the company at all times.
• Personnel from Fugro and subcontractors are expected to exhibit behavior which is aligned
with generally accepted behavioral values.
• The excessive use of any substance, in such a way as to intentionally modify mood, behavior
or performance, may lead to impose significant safety and security risks to the employee(s)
concerned and other personnel, and is not allowed at any time when on assignment
(including when off-duty).
• The security classification (extreme)/ high risk) or other restrictions (restricted territory)
imposed by the Project Location could lead to the implementation of more specific policies
regarding code of conduct as a part of Project Security Plan.
• The extent of disciplinary action upon breach of the applicable code of conduct should reflect
the level of risk within the assignment.
• In order to eliminate any incremental risk to the health and safety of all personnel at work
locations, Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd . policy is based on "Zero Tolerance" towards working
under the influence of drugs and alcohol in the work place.
s~~~ Date: 01 May 2015

Managing Director
Page 166
DRIVER & VEHICLE POLICY
Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. (FGTL) is committed to ensure the health, safety and welfare of all its
employees while at work and this includes driving whilst on company business.
This policy is applicable to all Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. employees driving company vehicles or
private/rental vehicles supplied by company. All employees and visitors to our premises are required
to adhere to this policy when driving or operating with the company or rental supplied vehicles at all
times as well as when operating or driving with their personal vehicles, either on job or during routine
journeys from home to work site and vice versa.
Driver competence is the main defense against vehicle accidents, because the driving environment
(road conditions, third party traffic) cannot always be controlled or anticipated. FGTL. has established
a driver and vehicle safety policy to increase the safety of our employees and the general public. The
objectives of this policy are to eliminate vehicular accidents and reduce injuries within our operations.
To minimise the risk of road accidents and injuries, it is the responsibility of the management to.
(a) Ensure that vehicle operations are licensed for the type of vehicle operated. Only
authorised persons are permitted to drive the company vehicles.
(b) To ensure FGTL Drivers adhere to safety rules and speed limit.
(c) Ensure there is a planned preventive maintenance programme for each company owned
vehicle.
(d) Investigate all vehicle accidents to determine the root cause and to recommend corrective
actions to prevent reoccurrence.
(e) Insist drivers of vehicles and the front seat passenger wear safety belts while driving.
(f) Drivers comply with traffic legislation, be conscious of road safety and demonstrate safe
driving.
(g) Provide company owned or rental vehicles, where applicable with all legal documentation
for use of employee/driver.
(h) Ensure all company owned and contracted vehicles are well maintained, in good running
conditions, suitable for the purpose and equipped with all safety and emergency
equipments/devices.
In line with above; the following control measures have been identified and shall be implemented in
accordance with local and international legal requirements.
(a) Driver must check weather condition and be informed on traffic and road works along the
route to travel and, eventually, reschedule or reroute the trip in case adverse conditions
are expected.
(b) Driver must follow the speed limits and the rules established by the local regulation.
(c) Driver must maintain a safe distance from the vehicle in front to achieve complete stop
safety.
(d) It is the responsibility of driver to ensure his passengers wear seat belts at all the time.
(e) Driver must not use a mobile phone, eat or smoke while driving.
(f) Driver must have a list of emergency contacts on vehicle to be immediately activated in
case of accidents or in other emergency situation.
(g) Driving under influence of alcohol, drugs or other controlled substances. is strictly
prohibited.
(h) Driver shall ensure that all registration, environmental clearance papers and all other
requisite papers are available at all times in the vehicle.
(i) Driver shall be responsible to maintain and update logbook.
U) It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure that the vehicle complies with all local
statutory requirements.
(~h---
Managing Director
Page 167
~GRD
SMOKING POLICY
This policy is applicable to all employees of Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. (FGTL), clients and visitors on
all properties including offshore vessels/rigs.
Due to the acknowledged hazards arising from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, it shall be
the policy of FGTL to provide a smoke free environment for all its employees and visitors. This policy
covers the smoking of any tobacco products and applies to both employees and non employees of
FGTL.
• There will be no smoking of tobacco products within the facilities at any time.
• Smoking onboard Rigs or Vessels is strictly prohibited except for designated areas within the
interior of the rig or vessel.
• The decision to provide or not to provide designated smoking areas outside the buildings and
ships/rigs will be at the discretion of site management.
• The designated smoking areas will be located at the discretion of the management.
• All material used for smoking, including cigarette butts and matches will be extinguished and
disposed off in appropriate containers which are to be found in the designated smoking areas.

Managing Director
Page 168
FUGRO GEOTECH PVT. LTD. r GRD
MOBILE TELEPHONE POLICY
This policy is applicable to all Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd. (FGTL) employees driving company vehicles or
private/rental vehicles on company business.
Further to Health, Safety FGTL has introduced a mobile phone policy as part of which the use of a
mobile or similar devices while driving on Company business or driving a Company vehicle / rental
Company supplied vehicle is strictly prohibited and considered a disciplinary offence.
A recent survey on mobile phone usage while operating an automobile indicates that drivers are 4
times more likely to have an accident while using a mobile phone. Due to this and other statistics
indicating an increase in the risk of vehicle accidents while utilizing mobile phones Fugro Geotech Pvt.
Ltd. will incorporate the following:
Fugro employees who elect to use a mobile phone while driving a vehicle (personal or company
owned/leased/rented) on company business, are required to either use a hand free device or
alternatively pull over and stop the vehicle before attempting the call or to receive a call.
(~'ih-
Managing Director
Page 169
Certificate of 1<§gistration
This certificate has been awarded to
Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd.

Plot No. 51, Sector- 6, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400705, India
in recoqnition of the organization's Environmental Management System which complies with
150 14001 :2004
The scope of activities covered by this certificate is defined below
To Provide Services in the Collection and Interpretation of Data Related

to the Earth's Surface and the Soils and Rocks beneath and Advising
the Clients Regarding these Matters
Certificate Number: Date of Issue: (Original) Date of Issue:
33860/B/0001/UKlEn 30 January 2009 30 January 2015
Issue No: Expiry Date:
3 29 January 2018
Issued by: On behalf of the Schemes Manager
e
UKAS
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS
0043
11there is. any doubt as 10 the au1hentic:ity of this certif.cate, please do not he~le to contact the Head Office of the Group on InfoGros.group.com.
URS is a m.mber of Registtarof Standatds{Holdings) Umited. washington xecse. 3 Outtey Road. Boumemouth, 8H2 5JQ. UK Pagelofl
Page 170
Certificate of 1?§gistration
Fugro GeOie:ch Pvt: Ltd.
Plot No. 51, Sector- 6,

~
Sanpada,
~
Navi Murnbai, Maharashtra, 400705, India
~
in recognition of the organization's Health and Safety Management System which complies
with
~,
OHSAS 18001 :2007

•
To Provide Services in the Collection and Interpretation of Data Related

to the Earth's Surface and the Soils and Rocks beneath and Advising
the Clients Regarding these Matters
338601 AlOOO 1/UKJE n 30 January 2009 30 January 2015
4 ... 29 January 2018
Issued by:
w On behalf of the Schemes Manager
~
UKAS
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS
0043
If there is any doubt as 10 the authlmticity of this eemucate, please do not hesitate 10 contact uie Head ornce of the Group on info@ros-group.com.
URS is a member of Registrar of Standards (Holdings) Umiled, Washington !-louse, 3 Durley Road, Boumemouth, BI-l25JQ. UK Page 1 of1
Page 171
Certificate of ~gistration
Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd.

Plot No. 51 , Sector- 6, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400705, India
in recogn ition of the organization's Quality Management System which complies with
ISO 9001:2008
To Provide Services in the collection and Interpretation of Data related

to the Earth's Surface and the Soils and Rocks beneath and advising
the Clients regarding these Matters
33860/C/000 1/U K/En 13 April 2011 13 April2014
2 12 Apri12017
~.
Issued by: On behalf of the Schemes Manager
~
UKAS
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS
0043
If there is any doubt as to the authenlic~y of this certifiCate , please do not hesitate to contact the Head OffiCe of the Group on info@ros-group.com.
URS is a member of Registrar of Standards (Holdings) Limited, Washington House, 3 Durley Road, Boumemouth, 8H2 5JQ . UK Page 1of t
Page 172
FORM ST-2
Shri/Ms. FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PVT LTD,PLOT NO. 51, SECTOR-6, SANPADA, NAVI
MUMBAI- 400705. having undertaken to comply with the conditions prescribed in Chapter V
of the Finance Act,1994 read with the Service Tax Rules,1994,and any orders issued thereun-
der is hereby certified to have been registered with the Central Excise Department.The Ser-
vice Tax Code and other details are mentioned hereunder.
Name : FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PVT LTD
Address : PLOT NO. 51, SECTOR-6, SANPADA, NAVI MUMBAI- 400705.
PAN No : AAACF4381L
Name as in PAN : FUGRO GEOTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
Nature of registration : Registration of a single premise
Service Tax Code(Registration AAACF4381LST001
Number) :
Taxable services : Business support service, Internet telecommunication service, Renting of immovable
property Service, Works contract service, Information technology software service,
Supply of Tangible Goods Service, Legal consultancy service, Management or busi-
ness consultant service, Rent-a-cab scheme operator Service, Manpower recruit-
ment/supply agency service, Broadcasting service, Scientific and technical con-
sultancy services, Maintenance or repair service, Transport of goods by road/goods
transport agency service
ADDRESS OF BUISNESS PREMISES
Name Of Premises/Building : PLOT NO. 51 Flat / Door / Block No : PLOT NO. 51
Road / Street / Lane : SECTOR-6 Village / Area / Lane : SANPADA,
Block / Taluk / Sub-Division / NAVI MUMBAI Post Office : SANPADA
Town :
City / District : THANE State / Union Territory : MAHARASHTRA
PIN : 400705 Phone Number : 65168662
Mobile Number : 9987509668 Fax Number-1 :
Fax Number 2 : Email Address : rchakote@hotmail.com
This Certificate is issued incorporating the changes intimated by the applicant and the previous certi-
ficate of registration bearing Registration NumberAAACF4381LST001 Issued on 07/04/2014 stand can-
celled.
Sl No Types of Services Accounting Codes
Tax Collection Other Receipts Penalties
(Interest)
1 Business support service 00440366 00440367
2 Internet telecommunication service 00440382 00440383
3 Renting of immovable property Service 00440406 00440407
4 Works contract service 00440410 00440411
5 Information technology software service 00440452 00440450
6 Supply of Tangible Goods Service 00440445 00440447
7 Legal consultancy service 00440480 00440483
8 Management or business consultant service 00440116 00440117
9 Rent-a-cab scheme operator Service 00440048 00440049
10 Manpower recruitment/supply agency service 00440060 00440061
11 Broadcasting service 00440165 00440166
12 Scientific and technical consultancy services 00440125 00440126
13 Maintenance or repair service 00440245 00440246
14 Transport of goods by road/goods transport agency 00440262 00440263
service
Page 1 of 2
Page 173
Sl No Types of Services Accounting Codes

Tax Collection Other Receipts Penalties
(Interest)
CESSES
1 EDUCATION CESS 00440298 00440299 00441486
2 SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION CESS 00440426 00440427 00441487
NOTE :
1. This Registration Certificate is downloaded from ACES website and would be accepted as proof of Registration.
Signature / stamp of the officer is not required on it.
2. The Registration is granted subject to post verification of prescribed documents as enlisted in the acknow-
ledgement to the application filed. If the prescribed documents are not received within 15 days of the date of filing
the registration application, the Registration granted is liable for revocation.
3. This Registration Certificate is not transferable.
4. In case the registrant starts providing any taxable service, other than those mentioned above, the registrant
shall file online amendment to this Certificate.
5. In case the registrant starts billing from premises, other than those mentioned above, the registrant shall file
online amendment to this Certificate.
6. The Accounting Codes for the services registered are given in the Certificate for furnishing in the challan while
paying Service Tax.
Remarks :
Upload File :
Date of Issue of Original ST-2 : 30/11/2006

Date of Last Amendment of ST-2 : 27/08/2015
Name:
Designation: Superintendent
Range: DIVISIONAL GROUP-II
Division: SERVICE TAX DIVISION-V
Commisionerate: SERVICE TAX COMMISSIONERATE-VII MUMBAI
CC ( by e-mail ) To -
(1) The Pay And Accounts Officer (SERVICE TAX COMMISSIONERATE-VII MUMBAI)
(2) The Superintendent of Central Excise (DIVISIONAL GROUP-II)
Page 2 of 2
Page 174
Position Engineering Manager
Name Ishwarkatti Siddharam Huvanna
Date of Birth December 11, 1978
Nationality Indian
Education: M.Tech. Geotechnical Engineering, Indian Institute of

Technology, Roorkee, India
B.E. Civil Engineering, Walchand institute of Technology,
Sholapur, India
Overall Experience: A total experience of 16+ years includes studies for many
projects on land, nearshore and offshore. Those projects include
offshore structures, on-shore and underwater pipelines,
navigation channel deepening and commercial and residential
structures. He has coordinated Fugro’s engineering and
reporting work for infrastructure projects.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Professional Experience
 Apr 2007 - Till Date - Fugro Geotech (India) Pvt. Ltd
 He has joined as Geotechnical Engineer in April 2007, promoted as a Project Manager- Engineering and
presently working as Engineering Manager from May 01, 2016.
 Prepared geotechnical reports for various onshore, near-shore geotechnical investigation projects in India.
 Jan 07 - Apr 07- Sohams Foundations Engineering Pvt. Ltd. – Design Engineer
 Prepared onshore geotechnical design report.
 Aug 06 - Dec 06 - M/s. Maccaferri Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. – Design

Engineer
Design of mechanically stabilized earth wall and reinforced soil slopes by using MSEW 3.0 software package
based on FHWA and BS 8006 standards providing the ground improvement solution. Bearing capacity and slope
stability analysis of reinforced Earth Wall. Design of stone columns, soil nailing design of silt pavement by using
Geocell. Slope stability problem by using Geo-slope software package.
 Aug 05 - July 06 - M/s. Ground Engineering Limited. – Design Engineer

Achieved success in getting the accreditation of NABL and ISO For testing laboratory. Prepared work instruction
manual, standard operating procedure and quality manual.
 Soil Investigation of energy technology center at Greater Noida for M/s NTPC ltd, New Delhi
 Soil Investigation work for 2x 125MW thermal power project at Barsingsar (Rajasthan) for M/s. BHEL
 Soil investigation for New Gas Turbines Foundation at Duliajan power station on behalf of Head Electrical, Oil
India Ltd.
-1-
Page 175
 Geotechnical Investigation for Diesel Hydropower project of BRPL, Bongaigaon(Assam) for M/s RRL ,
Mumbai
 Jan 02 - Dec 02 - Structon Consultants

 Worked as a Site Engineer.
 Aug 00 - Dec 01 - Konstelec Engineers Pvt Ltd .

 Site engineer under the consultancy of Reliance at Sholpur.
-2-
Page 176
Current Position Project Manager – Operations
Name Sachin Chaudhry
Date of Birth 24th January 1977
Nationality Indian
Education: B.E. in Civil Engineering from Shivaji University in 1st class with
Distinction
Languages known: English, Hindi & Punjabi
Key Experience Result oriented, dedicated civil engineer with strong interpersonal skills. A self-starter with bags of
energy who leads from the front and is not frightened to take initiative. Strong analytical skills and
the ability to think logically. Leadership capabilities and ability to interface with people at all levels –
clients, implementation, teams etc. Ability to work independently as well as perform in a team
oriented environment. Extensive experience on management, procurement and operational matters,
passionate about supporting individuals and business to excel. An accomplished manager, adept at
applying acquired industry knowledge to project work. Extending over 15 years of elevated
responsibility and experience in Civil / Geotechnical Industry.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional Experience
 Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd, India – Project Manager (Operations) -2013 – onwards
Develop contingency plans, budgets and logistical/strategic plans, alongside management teams, Expert in analytical trouble-
shooting and managing change, Express adaptability within various operational models, while implementing a rational approach
to problem identification/resolution, Spearhead project management duties such as cost control, resource management, and
assigning daily work load to all crew members, trades people and engineers, Ensure that all processes are carried out by
qualified tradesmen. Coordinate, monitor and manage all site activities of site staff, sub-contractors, trades and suppliers, pay
emphasis to quality / systems control, conducting in-coming, in-process and final inspections and Execute project objectives to
obtain usable footage using a systematic refinement of technical communications. Develop HSE Plans and executing projects
as per company HSE norms.
 Sukriti Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd – Sr. Project Engineer - from 2010 – 2013
Responsibilities include preparation of quotations and proposals, providing technical inputs, Billing and Estimation, Remedial
measures, for testing and consultancy projects. Analysis of survey reports, maps, drawings, blueprints, GPS data and other
topographical or geologic data (Soil strata etc.) to plan projects. Execution of Slope Stabilization Projects including design etc.,
NDT projects at site. Project inspection and supervision for construction and consultancy projects. Design of supporting
arrangement for structures in distress. Preparation of daily and monthly progress reports etc. Some major projects are as
below:
 Slope protection works using soil nailing technique of underground parking at Lucknow.
 Soil stabilisation using Soil Nailed Walles at Samtara, Shimla for a real estate company.
 Geotechnical Investigation for GMR Energy
 Geotechnical Investigation for RITES – geological mapping of underground utilities.
Page 177
 AECS Engineering & Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. – Sr. Engineer - from 2006 – 2010
Responsibilities include assisting senior professionals of AECS in the, Preparation of quotations and proposals, providing
technical inputs, Billing and Estimation, Remedial measures, for testing and consultancy projects. Execution of NDT projects at
site. Project inspection and supervision for consultancy projects. Design and Stability check for buildings. Some major projects
are as below:
 Slope stabilisation works at outfall sewer Russi at Nainital comprised of design

 Geotechnical investigation for SNC Lavalin Engineering
 Geotechnical investigation for Northern Railways
 Geotechnical investigation for Polyplex Ltd
 Geotechnical Investigation for Reliance Infrastructure Ltd
 AIMIL Ltd. – Project Engineer - from 2001 – 2006

Responsible for field works like drilling, topographic surveys, instrumentation, monitoring of structures etc. by being a part of a
qualified team of engineers, execution of NDT projects, preparing Daily progress reports for projects.
Page 178
Current Position Manager (Testing and Monitoring)
Name Aloke Samanta
Date of Birth October 31, 1977
Nationality Indian
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
Education: B. Tech. (Civil Engineering), Delhi College of engineering,
Delhi, 2005.
Additional qualification: Diploma in Civil Engineering, G.B. Pant Polytechnic, 1999.
Expertise:
Handled over 600 land, marine (Offshore) projects for laboratory testing.
Well aware and experienced in Project Management of Geotechnical Investigation Projects. He is involved
with analysis of results, procurement of laboratory materials and implementation of various quality systems
such as ISO 17025, ISO 9001. QA and QC of pipeline and tank insulation. Involved in development of
instrumentation and its application software for soil and rock testing equipment. Expertise in Pile Integrity Test
analysis, Thermal Conductivity, Pundit Test and other NDT, Electronic Cone Penetration Test and Pressure
meter / Elastometer tests. Achievement and implementation of ISO 17025 in the laboratory. Quality Control of
all testing services. Mix-Design calculations, test on concretes and concrete structures. He is involved with
preparation of reports for the suitability of concrete material for their use in different structures.
At present he is responsible for the following service line,
1. Laboratory testing: Comprises geotechnical laboratory testing, construction material testing,
Construction material quality control projects.
2. Foundation testing: comprising O Cell Load tests, conventional pile load tests, PIT, PDA and other
related tests.
3. Pavement studies
4. Instrumentation & Monitoring
Experiences:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional Experience:
 October 06 – Till date - Fugro Geotech Pvt. Ltd.
 Total experience includes various soil testing like triaxial test, direct shear test, consolidation liquid limit
test, concrete compressive strength, fineness, consistency of cement, tensile test on steel etc. tests on
rock like UCS test, Point load test, Brazilian, slake durability, rock triaxial, P Wave / S Wave, rebound
hammer and other concrete and material testing etc. for major projects like ONGC, Delhi Metro, RITES,
DLF, WAPCOS, Mumbai Metro, Paradip International, Gammon, DB Hospitality, POSCO and many more
clients.
 Quality Assurance and Control of the work done at site, LNG Power Plant Dabhol (Enron) Insulation of
pipe lines.
-1-
Page 179
 Involved in planning, coordinating & managing of the jobs in the laboratory. Quality checking of the test
results. Day to day work distribution for smooth functioning of the laboratory. Involved closely for soil
testing of ONGC’s offshore soil samples. He has been involved in Technical discussion with clients.
 Involved in analysis of pile integrity test results and preparation of reports.
 Management and out sourcing of manpower to sister concern operating companies.
 Octorber 2001 – October 2006 – Hydraulic and Engineering Instruments (Angron Geotech Pvt.
Ltd.), New Delhi.
Involved in the QC of the equipment for its proper working and developing (making necessary
suggestions for enhancing features of the software) software used for controlling the equipment and
analysis software as per Indian standards and ASTM standards.
Managing laboratory testing for various tests on soil (triaxial test, direct shear, consolidation, liquid limit
etc.) concrete (compressive strength, fineness, consistency of cement, tensile test on steel etc.) rock
(UCS test, point load, Brazilian, slake durability etc.) under the able guidance of Dr. T Ramamurthy (Ex-
HOD, Civil Engg. Dept. IIT Delhi). Involved in testing on rock, soil and concrete for Delhi Metro, RITES,
DLF, WAPCOS etc.
Providing inputs on modification of design to
Delivering training on Cyclic Triaxial, digital triaxial at all major Universities in India (IISC, Osmania
University, REC Silchar etc.), BHRC (Iran) and Tehran University (Iran) and other major universities and
companies.
 December 2000 – May 2001 – Punj Lloyd Insulation Ltd, New Delhi.
Worked as QA/QC Engineer, Quality Assurance and Control of the work done at site, Insulation of pipe
lines Quality control of insulation work done in LNG Tank.
 Nov 1999 – Oct 2000 – Central Water Commission, New Delhi.
Apprentice training at CWC, under Director Project Appraisal (South), helping with data maintenance of
dams and water resource related works.
 July 1999 – Oct 1999 – CMS Traffic Syystem Ltd., New Delhi.
Site supervision of the construction works for traffic signals, checking and ensuring the quality of
materials used.
Trainings Secured
 Participated in training on Applied Project Management conducted by 20|20 Business Insight, UK.
 Undertaken Training on Dynamic Characterization of Soil at CSMRS (2005).
 Undertaken trainings on Quality Systems
 Undertaken training for Laboratory Management & Internal Audit as per ISO/IEC 17025:2005 from
STQC, Pune.
-2-
Page 180
Trainings Pertained
 Training for Cyclic Triaxial at all major Universities in India (IISC, Osmania University, REC Silchar
etc.), BHRC (Iran) and Tehran University (Iran).
 Presented presentation on Soil, Material and Rock Testing at NCCBM, Faridabad (2004).
 Pertained training to Asst. Lecturers from different Govt. Institutes at Thapar Institute of Technology,
Patiala (2002).
 Training for digital triaxial system at REC Kurukshetra, Indore University, Ishfan University (Iran)
Responsibilities Undertaken in Fugro:

A. Primary Responsibilities -
1. Laboratory testing Services

2. Construction material quality control Services.
3. Foundation testing: comprising O Cell Load tests, conventional pile load tests, PIT, PDA and other
related Services.
4. Pavement studies Services
5. Instrumentation & Monitoring Services
6. Overall responsibility for providing the technical resources needed to ensure the quality of the
Laboratory Division’s operations. He will be assisted on his duties for all commercial, technical and
administrative matters within lab division, and report to the MD.
7. Administrative responsibilities evaluating and hiring job applicants, and administering training and
laboratory orientation. Arranging work schedules, reviewing staff performance and handling
disciplinary actions, appraisal etc. Establish lab procedures, creating and managing lab-related
documentation and organizing laboratory activities. Serving as the primary point of contact with
clients to provide information and take requests for services.
8. Ensures that the Quality Management System is established, implemented and maintained in
accordance with the ISO 9001 and ISO 17025 standards. Establishing quality standards,
supervising quality control, inspect staff work and adjust lab policies and procedures as needed
when standards aren’t met. Additionally, keep up-to-date on new amendment and changes in the
industry standards and investigate ways to improve procedures.
9. Manages the internal audit program
10. Keeping the laboratory organized and in compliance with QA/QC initiatives
11. Coordinates laboratory accreditation activities
12. Handles the maintenance and distribution of the Quality Manual and associated documents.
-3-
Page 181
13. Calibration and maintenance of laboratory equipment. A well-maintained laboratory can help
improve work efficiency and quality. Assist with and supervise the maintenance of the lab and
equipment. Maintenance usually involves inspection, cleaning, calibration, testing and repair of lab
equipment; and organization and cleaning of the lab, including preparation and storage rooms. If
necessary, contact vendors to provide maintenance services. Additionally, check supply levels and
orders, stores and distribute new supplies.
14. Maintains a master list of current versions of quality documentation
15. Prepare cost proposals for laboratory and field services. Perform quality control reviews of
laboratory results and issue final reports.
16. Train personnel on Quality Management System and activities.
B. Secondary Responsibilities:
1. Involved in project management of Geotechnical Investigation Projects.

2. Involved in project management of Foundation Testing Projects.
3. Field assignments including laboratory test performance.
4. Other administrative duties, as appropriate.
5. Interact with clients and be involved with marketing and business development activities, report
writing and proposals.
6. Communicate with internal and external clients regarding scope of services.
7. Hire, train, and supervise laboratory and field technician.
8. Promote safe work practices for all laboratory and field activities
C. HSE Responsibilities:
1) Responsible for identifying and assessing risks associated with handling of chemicals and carrying
out different tests in the laboratory and communicating the same to all concerned.
2) Responsible for actively participating in HSE meetings and advice safety related issues to Concerned
BLM.
3) Encourage the subordinates to submit HOC and report incidents as soon as possible.
4) To review incidents and HSE performance and to take corrective action.
5) Motivate the employees by setting examples and by demonstrating strong HSE leadership.
6) Identification of HSE training needs of personnel.
7) To include safety plans in the laboratory activities.
-4-
Page 182
PERSONAL Date of birth: August 01, 1986

INFORMATION: Nationality: Indian
Languages: English, Hindi, Marathi
EDUCATION: M.Sc. in Geology

Year passed: 2008,
University: University of Pune, Pune.
Country: India
B. Sc. In Geology
Nowrosjee Wadia College, Pune
Year passed: 2006
University: University of Pune, Pune.
Country: India
ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATION: ---
TRAINING COURSES: ---
SAFETY: 1. STCW (HUET-SEA SURVIVAL-FIRE FIGHTING)

2. HSE Principles of Risk Assessment
3. Managing safety in Fugro.
4. Fugro Supervisor Training.
5. Golden Rules of HSE
6. HSE Environmental Management
7. Safe Driving Behaviour
8. Office Workstation Ergonomics
9. An Introduction to Mechanical Lifting Operations
10. The Principles of HSE Incident Investigation
11. The Principles of Safe Manual Handling
12. The Principles of Risk Assessment
13. The Basics of Working at Height
14. Submitting a Hazard Observation in Fugro Impact
SOFTWARE: 1. GEODIN
Page 1
Page 183
OTHERS: 1. Detailed Soil /Rock Logging

2. In-situ testing
3. Site Management training
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY:
Dec 2008 – Present: Fugro Geotech (India) Private Limited, India.
Client: Swan Energy

Project: LNG terminal in Gujarat
Responsibilities: Site manager
Client: Archean Chgemical Industries Private Limited

Project: Kori creek Geotechnical Investigation at proposed Jetty in Budh
Bandar, Kutch District, Gujarat
Responsibilities: PMT engineer, Geologist
Client: APM Terminals Pipavav Port, Pipavav, Gujarat

Project: Near shore project
Client: SENER – AFCONS.

Project: Complementary Geotechnical Investigation for SENER –
AFCONS Jaigarh LNG Terminal.
Client: Shell Hazira, Hariza.

Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Shell Hazira, LNG Project at Hariza
Responsibilities: Site manager, also felicitated as best HSE practice
Client: Doha Metro rail

Project: Geotechnical Survey for Doha Metro rail (Red, Green, Gold line)
Client: AECOM, JNPT.

Project: Marine Geotechnical Investigation for JNPT,
4th container terminal, Mumbai
Responsibilities: Site manager
Client: Doha Metro

Project: Geotechnical Survey for Doha Metro rail (Red, Green, Gold line
Client: IHI
Project: Soil Investigation Work for Petronet Dahej Expansion Phase - IIIA,
LNG Storage Tanks
Responsibilities: Site manager, Geologist
Page 2 of 5
Page 184
Client: Roads & infrastructure framework project, Doha, Qatar.

Project: Geotechnical Survey for Roads & infrastructure framework
project, Doha, Qatar.
Client: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Project: Onshore Geotechnical Survey for Mozambique LNG project,
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (Phase III).

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (Phase III).
Client: PTA Project for JBF at Mangalore.

Project: Geotechnical & Soil investigation for PTA Project for
JBF at Mangalore
Responsibilities: Geologist

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (Phase II).
Client: Reliance Marine Terminal Jamnagar, India

Project: Marine Geotechnical Investigation for new Liquid and Multipurpose
Berths at Marine Terminal Jamnagar.
Client: Reliance Dahej Marine Terminal, Dahej, Gujarat, India

Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Reliance Dahej Marine Terminal at
Dahej, Gujarat.
Client: JNPT to Amba River, India

Project: Geophysical survey & geotechnical investigation for proposed
Dedicated anchorage area near JNPT & navigational channel from
JNPT to Amba River.
Responsibilities: Site Manager, Geologist
Client: OCT dredging area in Mumbai Harbour, India

Project: Conducting marine boring & soil investigations for
OCT dredging area in Mumbai Harbour
Page 3 of 5
Page 185
Client: ITC InfoTech Park at Pulikeshinagar, Bangalore, India

Project: Comprehensive Geotechnical investigation required for the
Proposed Commercial Development at ITC InfoTech Park at
Pulikeshinagar, Bangalore
Client: Shell Technology Center Project, Bangalore., India

Project: Geotechnical investigation services for the proposed
Shell Technology Centre Project, Bangalore.
Client: Honnavar port, Honnavar, Karnataka, India

Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Development of Barge Loading
Facilities at Honnavar port, Honnavar, Karnataka
Client: Charkop- Bandra- Mankhurd Metro corridor, MRTS project, India

Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Charkop- Bandra- Mankhurd
Metro corridor, MRTS project
Client: WFSL IIA, Worli Haji-ali Sea link, Mumbai, India

Project: Geotechnical & Geophysical Investigation-WFSL IIA,
Worli Haji-ali Sea link
Responsibilities: Site Manager, PMT Engineer, Geologist
Client: Greenfield seaport at Haldipur, Karnataka, India

Project: Geotechnical Investigation (marine) for all weather deep drafted
Greenfield seaport at Haldipur, Karnataka.
Client: All Weather port at Redi, Maharashtra

Project: Geotechnical Investigation for the Development of All Weather port
at Redi, Maharashtra.
Client: Princes Dock & Victoria Dock (Mumbai Port).

Project: Marine Geotechnical Investigation at Princes Dock & Victoria Dock
(Mumbai Port).
Client: Mumbai Harbour Channel and JN Port Channel

Project: Geotechnical Investigation by taking boreholes in Navigational
Area of Mumbai Harbour Channel and JN Port Channel.
Client: Mumbai Monorail Project (Line 2), Mumbai.

Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Mumbai Monorail Project (Line 2)
Page 4 of 5
Page 186
PERSONAL Date of birth: 02nd February 1986

INFORMATION: Nationality: Indian
Languages: English, Hindi, Marathi
EDUCATION: M.Sc. in Geology

University: Annamalai University
Country: India
ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATION: P.G. Diploma in Petroleum Exploration (Distant Education Department,

Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu), Graduate Diploma in
Information Technology.
TRAINING COURSES: ---
SAFETY: 1. STCW (HUET-SEA SURVIVAL-FIRE FIGHTING)

2. HSE Principles of Risk Assessment
3. Managing safety in Fugro.
4. Fugro Supervisor Training.
5. Golden Rules of HSE
6. HSE Environmental Management
7. Safe Driving Behaviour
8. Office Workstation Ergonomics
9. An Introduction to Mechanical Lifting Operations
10. The Principles of HSE Incident Investigation
11. The Principles of Safe Manual Handling
12. The Principles of Risk Assessment
13. The Basics of Working at Height
14. Submitting a Hazard Observation in Fugro Impact
SOFTWARE: 1.GEODIN
OTHERS: 1. Detailed Soil /Rock Logging

2. In-situ testing
3. Site Management training
-1-
Page 187
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Fugro Geotech (India) Private Limited, India.
Oct 2009 – Till Date:

Client: Andra Pradesh Gas Distribution Corporation Ltd. (APGDCL)
Project: Geotechnical Investigations
Responsibilities: Sr.Geologist
Client: Adani Vizhinjam port Pvt. Ltd

Project: Soil investigations for Container terminal

Project: Geotechnical investigation for LNG Project in Mozambique
Responsibilities: Geologist & CPT operator
Client: Fugro Middle East

Project: Jumana Island and Pointe in Dubai
Responsibilities: CPT operator

Project: Geotechnical investigation for LNG Project in Mozambique
Responsibilities: Conducted Seismic CPT
Client: Fugro Middle East

Project: Jumana Island and Pointe in Dubai
Responsibilities: Seismic CPT
Client: Quissanga national part in Mozambique for ENI

Project: Geotechnical investigation for Coastal road projects
Client: Vizhinjam International Seaport Ltd

Project: Geotechnical investigation
Client: IGL power plant

Project: Geo-technical Investigation at Manappad, Tuticorin.
Client: POSCO (I) Ltd

Project: Geotechnical Investigation Mahad, Maharashtra
Client: LKS (I) Ltd, Shiriwal, Maharashtra.

Project: Geological & Geotechnical Investigation
Client: MMRCL, Mumbai, Maharashtra

Project: Geotechnical Investigation
Client: IOCL, Paradip, Orissa

Project: Geo-technical Investigation
-2-
Page 188
Client: Hyundai Heavy Industries

Project: Vizhinjam International Seaport Ltd. Kerala, India
Client: Chennai Metro Rail Ltd,

Project: Land & Marine Geotechnical Investigation
Client: Larsen and Tubro at Honavara, Karnataka.

Project: Land & Marine Geotechnical Investigation
Client: APM Terminals, Pipavav, Gujarat.

Project: Geotechnical Investigation
Client: E & T terminals, Reliance, Jamnagar, Gujarat.

Project: Geotechnical investigation
Client: dry bulk terminal at Tuna, Kandla.

Project: Sub-soil investigation - Jetty & approach trestle
Client: Cochin Port Trust at Puthu Vypin, Cochin, Kerala

Project: Geotechnical investigation for LPG Berth & Outer Harbour
Client: JBF at Mangalore, Karnataka

Project: Soil investigation for PTA project
Client: Keller Ground Engineering India Pvt Ltd at Adani Port SEZ,
Mundra, Kutch(dist), Gujarat
Project: Soil investigation
Client: Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project Unit 1&2 at Kudankulam,

Tirunelveli (dist), Tamil Nadu
Project: Soil investigation for additional
Sep 2008 – Sep 2009 OCE project PVT. LTD, INDIA

Geotechnical investigation for MPPGCL, Madhya Pradesh.
Geotechnical Investigation for Thane-Diwa Railway line for RITES, Maharashtra.
Geotechnical Investigation for ROB for J.Kumar at Jogeshwari, Mumbai,

Maharashtra.
Geotechnical investigation for NTPC at kohdarghat, Ellahabad, Uttar Pradesh.
-3-
Page 189
Page 190
Received with thanks from Fugro Geotech Private Limited a return of income in ITR No.
o I(SAHAJ) 0 2 0 3 04S(SUGAM)
for the assessment year 2012-13, having the following particulars
0 4 0 5 0 6
~Name ~PAN
Fugro Geotech Private Limited AAACF4381L
~SEX IA6l DATE OF BIRTH IA7l INCOMETAX WARD / CIRCLE

o Male 0 Female
1rWI0/1996 Wi:rd I
~ FLATIDOORIBUILDING ~ ROAD / STREET

3A11 3Rd Floor Hastings Chamber 7C Kiran Shankar Roy Road
~ AREA / LOCALITY ~ TOWN / CITY / DISTRICT

High Court r KOLKATA
El STATE ~ PINCODE
WESTBENGAL 700001
IAI4 I Fill only one: filed > o Before due date 139(J )
or in response to notice > 142(1)
•
Deductions Under Chapter VI-A B2 NIL
Total Income B3 20152120
Current Loss if any B4 NIL
Net Tax Payable B5 6538356
B6 NIL
Total tax and interest payable B7 6538356
Total Advance Tax Paid B8 NIL
Total SelfAssessment Tax Paid B9 NIL
Total IDS Deducted BIO 14617875
Total TCS Deducted BII NIL
Total Prepaid Taxes Paid (B8+B9+BIO+BII)) BI2 14617875
Tax Payable (B7 - B12, IfB7 > B 12) BI 3 NIL
Refund (B 12-B7, IfB 12>B7) BI4 8079520
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONL Y

S-' E..l "'~
h. .
Al,
' -0 i ~.,:'.I.;,...Tr~ ,fAN'-f)
.., . " . : J.. ~~-!(
..... . . J-'N f"",".· . -, Of
-\ Tt....)'J-'...;~ s.
STAMP RECETPT NO.HERE RE C EIVING OFFICIAL
·,~~.... . "
• ..' <~r·'
. Page 191
.. . . • '2-0l0 - 1. 01'
Receivedwith thanks from Fugro Geotech Private Limited a return of incomein ITR No.
o l(SAHAJ)
for the assessment year
0 2 0 3 o
4S (SUGAM) ,
2011-12, having the following particulars
0 4 0 5
•
l~lName ~PAN
Fugro Geotech Private Limited AAACF4381L
~SEX IA6l DATE OF BIRTH IA7l INCOMETAX WARD / CIRCLE
o Male 0 Female
'uW10/1996 Wirdl
~ FLAT/DOOR/BUILDING ~ ROAD / STREET

3A1l 3Rd Floor Hastings Chamber 7C Kiran Shankar Roy Road
lAW I AREA / LOCALITY· ~ TOWN / CITY I DISTRICT
High Court KOLKATA
IA12 I STATE IA13 I PINCODE

WESTBENGAL 700001
I
IA14 Fill onlyone: filed> o Beforedue date 139(1) o After due date 139(4) o RevisedReturn 139(5)
or in response to notice> 142(1) 148 153A/153C
Deductions Under Chapter VI-A B2 NIL
Total Income B3 NIL
Current Loss if any B4 10546565
Net Tax Payable B5 NIL
B6 NIL
Total tax and interest payable B7 NIL
Total Advance Tax Paid B8 NIL
Total Self Assessment Tax Paid B9 NIL
Total IDS Deducted BIO 18373509
Total TCS Deducted Bll NIL
Total Prepaid Taxes Paid (B8+B9+B I O+BI I)) BI2 18373509
Tax Payable (B7 - BI2, IfB7 > BI2) B13 NIL
Refund (BI2-B7, IfBI2>B7) BI4 18373510
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SEAL, nATE AND SICNATlJRE (IF
STAMP RECEIPT NO.HERE RECEIVIN(; OFFICIAL
Page 192
INDIAN INCOME TAX RETURN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Assessment Year
[Where the data of the Return ofIncome/Fringe Benefits in Form SARAL-II (ITR-1),
ITR-2, ITR-3, ITR-4, ITR-5, ITR-6 transmitted electronically with digital signature] 2010-11
Name PAN
Fugro Geotech Private Limited
IAAACF4381L
Flat!DoorlBlock No Name Of Premises/BuildingIVillage
3A11 3RdFIoor Hastings Chamber
7C Kiran Shankar Roy Road High Court
TOWII/Cit !District State Pin PVTCOMPAl'

KQlkata
WEST BENGAL 700001
Designation of AO(Ward/Circle) 1
E-filing Acknowledgement Number 167030391061010 06-10-2010

Gross total income 1 21611986
2 Deductions under Chapter-VI-A 2 o
3 Total Income 3 21611986
3a Current Year loss, ifany 3a o

4 Net tax payable 4 7345916
5 Interest payable 5 o
6 Total tax and interest payable 6 7345916
7 Taxes Paid
a Advance T o
b TDS 13738728
c TCS o
d Self Assessment Tax o
e Total Taxes Paid (7a+7b+7c +7d) 7e 13738728
8 8 o
9 Refund (7e-6) 9 6392812
This return has been digitally signed by Santanu Sivaprosad Moitra

. th . f Director
In e capacity 0 having PAN AHEPM2666B from
IP Address
Dsc SI no
121.247.228.165 on 06-10-2010 at Kolkata
51429319999723839250214720043243141719CN=Safescrypt RCAIClass
1111 1IIImiiIII
~CF4381L6167030391061010CE4AF94099B8D4E9B23F91A4AA827C
9BDF66BBC4
& issuer 2 OnSiteIndividual Subscriber CA, OU=RCAI Class 2 OnSiteIndividual
---------~-
-------.,.---~ ----~. __ . ----_._-_._----.,-------~---- ----~----
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
DETAILED INFORMATION IN RESPECT OF TECHNICAL PERSONNEL AVAILABLE WITH THE COMPANY
Total No. of
Academic Qualification Year of
Sl. No. Name Designation years of
Degree / Masters passing
experience
1 R. L. Ganju M.Sc. (Applied Geology) Regional Manager 1968 43
2 Satish B Pingle B.E. (Civil) Commercial Manager 1979 33
3 Sunit Kumar Banerjee M.Sc.(Applied Geology) Business Line Manager - 1981
35
Onshore
4 Balbir Singh M.Sc. (Geology) Project Manager – Delhi 1984 27
5 P.V. Jayakumar M.Sc. (Geology) Business Line Manager - 1990
25
Nearshore
6 Arjun Singh Negi Diploma in Survey Asst Manager - Survey 1990 21
7 Sankar Sampath M.Sc. (Geology) Project Manager- Chennai 1993 19
8 Bhoopendra Narayan Diploma & B.Tech ( Civil Engineer 1990 & 2013
19
Pandey Engineering )
9 Sachin Chaudhry Bachelors Degree in Civil Project Manager - Operations 2001
15
Engineering
10 Soumendra N. Ganguly Diploma in Survey Engineering Project Manager - Kolkata 1998
15
11 Bhartendu Tiwari B E Civil Engineer Business Delivery Manager 2001 15
12 Sidharam Ishwarkatti M.Tech.(Geotechnical Project Manager Engineering 2005
11
Engineering)
13 Aloke Samanta B.Tech. (Civil Engineering) Project Manger-Laboratory 2005 12
14 Abhay Keshaverao M.Sc Geology Geologist 1994
11
Athavale
15 Pawan Kumar M. Tech. (Geophysics) Asst. Manager Geophysics 2001 11
16 Kishorilal Mahesh Chander M.Sc. (Geology) Assistant Project Manager 2002
11
17 Phalguni Sur M.Sc. (Geology) Assistant Project Manager 2003 11
18 Biju K. M.Sc. (Geology) Lab Geologist 2003 11
19 Sunil Dutt B.Tech in Mechanical Assistant Project Manager 2006
8
Engineering
20 Rajesh Kale Diploma in Civil Engineering Surveyor 2008 7
21 Amol Patil M.Sc. (Geology) Geologist 2008 6
22 Ranjana Kaith M.Sc. (Geology) Lab. Geologist 2008 6
23 Gireesh TV M.Sc. (Geology) Geologist 2008 5
24 Alok Shah M.Sc. (Geology) Geologist 2009 5
25 Shantanu Bhattacharjee M.Sc. Geology Tr. Geologist 2009 5
26 Sudip Dutta M.Sc-Geology Geologist 2010 5
27 Presenjit Bera ITI Survey Surveyor 2010 5
28 Sudhakar D. M.Sc Geology Geologist 2012 3
29 Rizvan Ahmad M. Tech. ( Applied Geology) Geologist 2012
2
30 Arunkumar G. B.E.(Harbour Engineering Engineer 2013
& Offshore Technology) 2.5
31 Ajmal Abdul Wahab Dip in Civil Engg Lab Technician 2013

2
Mukadam
32 Bipadtaran Khan M.Sc(Tech.) Geology Geologist 2013 1.5
33 Kevin Nazareth M.Sc. Geology Tr. Geologist 2014 1.5
34 Mihir Raje M Tech Engineering Geology Tr. Geotechnical Engineer 2014
1.5
35 Santhoshkumar Gunagenji M Sc Tech Applied Tr. Geophysicist 2014
1
Geophysics
36 Ankit Sahni B E Civil Engineer Tr. Civil Engineer 2015 0.5
Page 196
Evaluation Report on Utility Sub-contractor

Sl.No. Description Details
1 Location
2 Name of Contractor HCC
Geotechnical Investigation for
3 Scope of Work
Mumbai Metro Line -3
4 Name of Subcontractor Fugro geotech (India) Pvt.Ltd.
3A/ Hasting Chambers,7C Kiran
5 Registered Office Address
Shankar Roy Road,Kolkata
6 Contact Person SK Banerjee
7 Telephone nos. 022-65168662
8 Zip/PIN code 700 001
9 Email s.banerjee@fugro.com
10 Valid PAN / GIR No. AAACF4381L
11 IT Clearance certificate Copy attached
12 CST( If available ) 27630366407C
13 LST ( If available ) 27630366407V
14 Exice Registration ( If available ) NA
15 Service Tax Registration No. AAACF4381L/ST/001
16 P.F.Registration No. MH/97709
17 Workman Compensation policy No. Copy attached
18 ISO Certification ( If available ) Copy attached
Quality Assurance/ Quality plan of the
19
organisation Copy attached
Safety procedure manual / Safety plan of
20
organisation Copy attached
Organisation Type ( Partnership, Private,
Propriety, PSU , Public, Govt., Associate,
21
Foreign Company, Joint Venture, Subsidiary,
Others ) Private Ltd
Page 197
Annual Turnover of past five (5) years ( Attach copy of annual reports /
Certificate of turnover ):
Turnover ( Rs. In Lakhs

S.No. Financial year ending Remarks
)
1 2014-2015 10430000
2 2013-2014 106722000
3 2012-2013 21027000
4 2011-2012 16963000
Previous experience in India / Overseas of past five (5) years ( Attach copy of WO and
completion certificate / Final certificate copy of Invoice ):
Duration of
WO Values
S.No. Project Country State Client Discipline Job in
(Rs. In Lakhs)
months
1 Copy attached
2
3
Jobs in hand ( Attach copy of WO ):

WO Values Duration of
S.No. Project Country State Client Discipline
(Rs. In Lakhs) Job in hand
1
2
Labour Mobilisation capacity:

Peak mobilisation Source
S.No. Workmen Category Source state
capacity numbers Country
1 Highly Skilled
2 Skilled
3 Semi-Skilled
4 Unskilled
Equipment owened as on date:

S.No. Equipment ( Category / class ) Capacity / Make Nos. owned
1 Copy attached
2
3
4
Details of Key personnel on Roll:

S.No. Name of the person Position Qualification Experience
1 Owner/Proprietor
2 Partner(s)
3 Director(s)
4 Chief Executive

Geotechnical Investigation Program Mumbai Metro Line Package-3 UGC-02 (Tunnels)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Geotechnical Investigation Program Mumbai Metro Line Package-3 UGC-02 (Tunnels)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geotechnical Investigation Program Mumbai Metro Line Package-3 UGC-02 (Tunnels)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

PROGRAM OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

MUMBAI METRO LINE -3 (COLABA-BANDA-SEEPZ)

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

Sr. No. DESCRIPTION Page

4. REVIEW OF GEOLOGICAL DATA 04

7. LABORATORY & INSITU TEST PLAN 09

10. RELEVANT IS CODES & STANDARDS 18

11. MACHINERY TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 20

14. RISK MANAGEMENT 22

15. HANDLING OF EMERGENCIES 23

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

2. SALIENT FEATURES OF PACKAGE (UGC-02)

North Bound Tunnel : 3817.038m (From Ch. 4025.579m to Ch. 7842.617m).

South Bound Tunnel : 3804.167m (From Ch. 4056.053 to Ch. 7860.220m).

Metro Station : 4 nos. Underground Station

• CST Station : 255m

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

4. REVIEW OF GEOLOGICAL DATA

STAGE-I investigation includes the GI required to develop initial Geological model to

Table-1, Location of Geotechnical Investigation (STAGE-I)

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

Table-2, Location of Geotechnical Investigation (STAGE-II)

1 SDH-4 3900 30 CST Station

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

1 CPDH-1 35 Between CST to

6. TYPES OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

6.1 Exploratory Drilling

 SPT test will be carried out in boreholes as per IS Standards, the

 Disturbed/undisturbed soil samples, rock core samples and ground water

 Permeability testing of boreholes will be carried out as per IS codes.

A programme/ Schedule of relevant laboratory tests of each borehole will be submitted

Laboratory Tests on Collected Samples

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (GI)

i) Type of Laboratory tests on soil samples:

a) Natural Moisture Content (NMC)

iii) Chemical analysis of soil and water samples.

i). The following In-situ testing will be performed in soil formation

MUMBAI METRO LINE-3 04-08-2016

PACKAGE UGC-02 REVISION-00