FUGRO PELAGOS, INC.

FIELD OPERATIONS & COMPLIANCE REPORT

DCOR, LLC SIDE SCAN SONAR PIPELINE
INSPECTION SURVEY
OFFSHORE LONG BEACH, OXNARD,
CARPINTERIA
CALIFORNIA

15 November to 25 November 2016

Fugro Project No.: 23.00007195

California State Lands Commission

Volume 1 of 1

Draft Release R0
FUGRO PELAGOS, INC.

FIELD OPERATIONS & COMPLIANCE REPORT

DCOR, LLC SIDE SCAN SONAR PIPELINE
INSPECTION SURVEY
OFFSHORE LONG BEACH, OXNARD,
CARPINTERIA
CALIFORNIA

15 November to 25 November 2016

Fugro Project No.: 23.00007195

Volume 1 of 1

Prepared for: California State Lands Commission

100 Howe Ave. Suite 100-South
Sacramento, CA 95825-8202

R0 Draft BV CP CP 12/21/2016
Issue Report Status Prepared Checked Approved Date
CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
FIELD OPERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE REPORT

CONTENTS

1. SURVEY INFORMATION 1
1.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK PERFORMED 1
1.2 DATA COLLECTION DATES, TIMES, WEATHER AND SEA STATE DURING OPERATIONS 1
1.3 CHART OF SURVEY AREA 2
1.4 SPATIAL INFORMATION RELATED TO SURVEY TRACKLINES 2
1.5 NATURE AND LOCATION OF ENVORNMENTAL HAZARDS ENCOUNTERED 2
1.6 ACCIDENT, INJURY, DAMAGE TO OR LOSS OF PROPERTY 2

2. BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION 3

APPENDICES

A. MARINE FIELD MONITORING REPORT AND SURVEY TRACKPLOT

B. EXHIBIT H

Fugro Document No. 23.00007195_CSLC_Report R0 Page i of i

CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
FIELD OPERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE REPORT

1. SURVEY INFORMATION

1.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK PERFORMED

Over a seven-day period, between November 15 and 25, 2016, Fugro Pelagos, Inc. (Fugro) provided
side scan sonar pipeline inspection services for all the pipelines DCOR operates in Southern
California. The purpose of the side scan sonar survey was to acquire seafloor imaging of existing
pipelines and document the seafloor conditions within the wide-swath area by locating scour marks,
fluid vents, submarine landslides, fault scarps, trawl marks, pipeline spans, and man-made debris
that might have an impact on pipeline or platform integrity. The surveys also identified where pipelines
were exposed and buried. Pipelines included in the surveys:
 Platform C to Platform B – Pipeline Bundle
 Platform B to Platform A – 8” Gas Pipeline, 8” Oil Pipeline and Pipeline Bundle(Abandoned)
 Platform B to Rincon – 12” Oil Pipeline(Abandoned), 12” Gas(Abandoned) and 6”
Water(Abandoned)
 Platform A to Lower Rincon – 12” Gas Pipeline and 12” Oil Pipeline
 Platform Hillhouse to Platform A – 6” Gas Pipeline, 6” Gas(Idle)
 Platform Henry to Platform Hillhouse – 6” Water Pipeline, 6” Gas Pipeline and 8” Oil Pipeline
 Platform Habitat to Shore – 12” Gas Pipeline
 Platform Gilda to Mandalay – Pipeline Bundle
 Platform Gina to Mandalay – Pipeline Bundle
 Platform Edith to Platform Elly (Beta) – 6” Oil
 Platform Edith to Platform Eva – 6” Gas

1.2 DATA COLLECTION DATES, TIMES, WEATHER AND SEA STATE DURING OPERATIONS

Daily progress reports (DPRs) were generated for each survey day which included daily events,
Quality, Health, Safety, & Environmental (QHSE) summary, weather conditions, hours worked, and
any Health, Safety & Environmental (HSE) incidents if incurred. Below is a table describing survey
dates and weather conditions, as recorded in the DPRs.

Date Start Time End Time Weather

11/15/16 8:30am 4:00pm Winds 5-20KT
Seas 2-4FT
11/16/16 7:00am 8:30am Winds 5-40KT
Seas 3-5FT
11/17/16 7:55am 2:10pm Winds 5-20KT
Seas 4-6FT
11/18/16 8:40am 4:00pm Winds 5-15KT
Seas 1-3FT
11/22/16 7:50am 4:05pm Winds 10KT
Seas 2-4FT
11/23/16 7:15am 3:30pm Winds 10-15KT
Seas 1-3FT
11/25/16 8:20am 4:10pm Winds 5-10KT
Seas 1-2FT

Fugro Document No. 23.00007195_CSLC_Report R0 Page 1 of 9

CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
FIELD OPERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE REPORT

1.3 CHART OF SURVEY AREA

A chart of the survey trackplot is included at the end of this report.

1.4 SPATIAL INFORMATION RELATED TO SURVEY TRACKLINES

Accompanying and made part of this report is the digital ArcGIS shapefiles depicting the survey trackplot.

1.5 NATURE AND LOCATION OF ENVORNMENTAL HAZARDS ENCOUNTERED

No environmental hazards were encountered during survey operations.

1.6 ACCIDENT, INJURY, DAMAGE TO OR LOSS OF PROPERTY

No accidents or injuries occurred during the operations of the project, and no damages or loss of property
was reported.

Fugro Document No. 23.00007195_CSLC_Report R0 Page 2 of 9

CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
FIELD OPERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE REPORT

2. BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Because the project included surveys within California State Lands Commission (CSLC) jurisdiction,
using geophysical equipment operated at a frequency above 200 kHz, these surveys were conducted
during daylight hours only and a marine mammal observer was onboard. A copy of the final Marine
Wildlife Monitoring Report can be found in Appendix A. In accordance with CSLC regulations, a
completed copy of Exhibit H taken from Fugro Geophysical Permit PRC 8391.9 has been completed
with acknowledgements and included in Appendix B.
.

Fugro Document No. 23.00007195_CSLC_Report R0 Page 3 of 9

CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
FIELD OPERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE REPORT

APPENDICES

A. MARINE FIELD MONITORING REPORT AND SURVEY TRACKPLOT

B. EXHIBIT H

Fugro Document No. 23.00007195_CSLC_Report R0 Appendices

CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
FIELD OPERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE REPORT

A. MARINE FIELD MONITORING REPORT AND SURVEY TRACKPLOT

Fugro Document No. 23.00007195_CSLC_Report R0 Appendix A

MARINE WILDLIFE MONITORING
REPORT
DCOR LLC. SIDE SCAN SONAR SURVEY
OFFSHORE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Project No. 1602-2781

Prepared for:
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
4820 McGrath St., Suite 100
Ventura, California 93003

Prepared by:
Padre Associates, Inc.
369 Pacific Street
San Luis Obispo, California 93401

DECEMBER 2016
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1
1.1 PROJECT ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................. 1-1
2.0 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................. 2-1
3.0 METHODS .......................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 PERSONNEL .................................................................................................................3-1
3.2 FISHING GEAR CLEARANCE ...................................................................................... 3-1
3.3 MONITORING METHODS ............................................................................................. 3-1
3.3.1 Vessel Transit .........................................................................................................3-1
3.3.2 Survey Monitoring ................................................................................................... 3-1
3.4 PINNIPED HAUL-OUTS ................................................................................................ 3-2
3.5 MARINE PROTECTED AREAS ..................................................................................... 3-2
4.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 4-1
4.1 SPECIES OBSERVED ................................................................................................... 4-1
4.2 FISHING GEAR .............................................................................................................4-1
5.0 CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................... 5-1

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1. Survey Area 1 .......................................................................................................... 1-2
Figure 1-2. Survey Area 2 .......................................................................................................... 1-3
Figure 1-3. Survey Area 3 .......................................................................................................... 1-4

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. OGPP Marine Wildlife Mitigation Measures ............................................................. 2-2
Table 4-1. Species Observations .............................................................................................. 4-1

APPENDICES
Appendix A – Daily Marine Wildlife Observation Tables

-i-
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report (Report) has been prepared for Fugro Pelagos,
Inc. (Fugro) to document the permit compliance and associated observations of marine mammals
and turtles (marine wildlife) during a side scan sonar survey (Project) along existing pipeline
routes, located offshore Carpentaria, Ventura, and Huntington Beach, California. The monitoring
methods and avoidance measures detailed in this Report were implemented in accordance with
the requirements in the existing Low-Energy Offshore Geophysical Permit PRC 8391.9 issued by
the California State Lands Commission (CSLC).
Monitoring and avoidance measures were implemented during the Project to minimize
adverse impacts to marine wildlife within the Project area. This Report summarizes the results of
the monitoring and measures implemented during the Project to reduce or eliminate potential
impacts to marine wildlife.

1.1 PROJECT ACTIVITIES

The survey utilized a side scan sonar to inspect all existing DCOR, LLC. (DCOR) oil and
gas pipelines in the three survey areas. The three survey areas were located in the Southern
California Bight, offshore the cities of Carpentaria (Survey Area 1), Ventura (Survey Area 2), and
Huntington Beach (Survey Area 3) (Figures 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3). The survey was conducted from
the survey vessel Jab, owned and operated by Theory Maine Services, LLC. Survey depths
ranged from 15 to 91 meters (m) (50 to 300 feet [ft]). The survey was conducted for a total of
nine days: November 15 through November 18, 2016, and November 21, 2016 through November
26, 2016, with the exclusion of November 24, 2016. The acoustic equipment used during the
survey was an Edgetech 4125 which was operated within a frequency range of 400 to 900
kilohertz (kHz).

- 1-1 -
 6070000 6080000 6090000 6100000 6110000 6120000 6130000

Legend
1970000

1970000
Pow
er
Cabl
e( Ab
andone
d)
Tracklines

Hil da

Pi peli
ne (A
bandoned
)

Power
Cabl
e( Ab
andoned)

Hazel

Notes:
1960000

1960000
Coordinate Grid: State Plane, NAD 83,
Hoga
n
to
Sh
ore
Pi
peli
ne
Bund
le

CA Zone 5, Feet
Background: NOAA Nautical Chart 18720.

Survey was conducted November 15-25, 2016.

Punt a
G or da

Rinco
nI sl
and
1950000

1950000
Ü
1940000

1940000
1 inch = 5,000 feet
5,000 2,500 0 5,000
Feet

DCOR
CARPINTERIA TO SEACLIFF AREA
SURVEY LINES
TRACKPLOT
Santa Barbara Channel, CA
1930000

1930000
NOAA Office of Coast Survey

6070000 6080000 6090000 6100000 6110000 6120000 6130000

Plate 1
 6130000 6140000 6150000 6160000 6170000 6180000 6190000

Legend

Tracklines
1900000

1900000
Notes:
Coordinate Grid: State Plane, NAD 83,
CA Zone 5, Feet
1890000

1890000
Background: NOAA Nautical Chart 18720.

Survey was conducted November 15-25, 2016.

1880000

1880000
8" Sour
Gas
( M-
30)
8"
Ga
s(
M-
29)
Ü
1 inch = 5,000 feet
1870000

1870000
Gai l

5,000 2,500 0 5,000

Feet

DCOR
GI NA

MANDALAY AREA
SURVEY LINES
TRACKPLOT
Offshore Mandalay Beach , CA
NOAA Office of Coast Survey

6130000 6140000 6150000 6160000 6170000 6180000 6190000

Plate 2
 6520000 6530000 6540000 6550000 6560000 6570000

Legend

Tracklines
1700000

1700000
Notes:
Coordinate Grid: State Plane, NAD 83,
CA Zone 5, Feet
Background: NOAA Nautical Chart 18746.

Survey was conducted November 15-25, 2016.

i ne
Pi pel
O il
16"
1690000

1690000
Ü
1680000

1680000
1 inch = 5,000 feet
5,000 2,500 0 5,000
Feet

DCOR
OFFSHORE HUNTINGTON BEACH
1670000

1670000
SURVEY LINES
TRACKPLOT
San Pedro Channel , CA
NOAA Office of Coast Survey

6520000 6530000 6540000 6550000 6560000 6570000

Plate 3
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

2.0 REGULATORY SETTING

The CSLC Offshore Geophysical Permit Program (OGPP) requires individual surveying
entities to obtain an OGPP non-exclusive permit to perform low-energy geophysical surveys of
the ocean bottom and marine environment. Under the OGPP, operators are permitted to conduct
surveys using specific types of geophysical equipment subject to permit terms and conditions
developed to minimize impacts to marine wildlife and the coastal environment. In August 2013,
the CSLC identified potential impacts to marine wildlife from acoustical survey equipment within
a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), and identified mitigation measures that would reduce or
avoid those impacts to a point where no significant impacts would occur. This Report details the
compliance with the applicable OGPP permit mitigation measures as outlined in Table 2-1.
In addition, The United States Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972, amended
1994, protects all marine mammals, including cetaceans (whales, dolphins, and porpoises),
pinnipeds (seals and sea lions), sirenians (manatees and dugongs), sea otters, and polar bears
within the waters of the United States. Specifically, the MMPA prohibits the intentional killing or
harassment of these marine mammals; however, incidental harassment, with authorization from
the appropriate Federal agency, may be permitted. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Fisheries is responsible for enforcing the MMPA.
Special status species are protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973 (Section 9 and implementing regulations 50 CFR Part 17). The Federal ESA makes it
unlawful to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect an endangered
species, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. Anyone violating the provisions of the
Federal ESA and regulations is subject to a fine and imprisonment. An “endangered species” is
any species which the Secretaries of the Department of the Interior and/or the Department of
Commerce determine is in danger of extinction throughout all or a portion of its range. A
“threatened species” is any species which the Secretaries determine is likely to become an
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its
range. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NOAA Fisheries are
responsible for implementation of the Federal ESA.

- 2-1 -
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

Table 2-1. OGPP Marine Wildlife Mitigation Measures

Condition Number Measure

Marine Wildlife Contingency Plan (MWCP): Except as otherwise provided in Exhibit

E, Part II, at least 21 calendar days prior to each survey, Permittee shall prepare a
MWCP for review and approval by the CSLC staff. Said plan shall include, at a
minimum, measures that: 1) specify the distance, speed, and direction transit vessels
would maintain when in proximity to a marine mammal or reptile; 2) qualifications,
number, location, and authority of onboard Marine Wildlife Monitors (MWMs); 3)
methods of reducing noise levels generated by the geophysical equipment; 4)
Acoustic “safety zone(s)” radius that will be enforced by the MWMs (must be
consistent with MM BIO-3 in attached Exhibit H); 5) identification of pinniped haul-out
sites within or immediately adjacent to the proposed survey area; and 6) observation
recording procedures and reporting requirements in the event of an observed impact
to marine organisms.
i. For surveys within 300 m (984 ft) of a pinniped haul-out site, the MWCP shall
Condition 5(c)
further require that:
1. The survey vessel shall not approach within 91 m (300 ft) of a haul-out
site, consistent with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) guidelines;
2. Survey activity close to haul-out sites shall be conducted in an expedited
manner to minimize the potential for disturbance of pinnipeds on land; and
3. MWMs shall monitor pinniped activity onshore as the vessel approaches,
observing and reporting on the number of pinnipeds potentially being
disturbed (e.g. via head lifting, flushing into the water).
ii. Qualifications of proposed MWMs shall also be submitted to the NOAA and
CSLC staff at least 21 calendar days in advance of the survey. Survey
operations shall not commence until the SLC staff approves the MWMs and the
MWCP.

Current Biological Information (MM BIO-1, Exhibit H): Prior to commencement of

survey operations, the Permittee shall; 1) contact the NOAA Long Beach Office Staff
and local whale-watching operations and shall acquire information on the current
Condition 5(h)
composition and relative abundance of marine wildlife offshore, and 2) convey
sightings data to the vessel operator and crew, survey party chief, and MWMs prior to
departure.

Nighttime Operations: Permittee shall not conduct night time survey operations,
except when the CSLC staff may authorize at its discretion, upon application, the
Condition 7(d) Permittee to use single beam echosounders and/or passive equipment types at night
on a case-by-case basis. The CSLC staff will take into consideration the equipment
specification, location, timing, and duration of survey activity.

Marine Wildlife Monitors: A minimum of two qualified MWMs who are experienced in
marine wildlife observations shall be onboard the survey vessel throughout both
Condition 7(h) transit and data collection activities. Onboard MWMs responsible for observation
during vessel transit shall be responsible for monitoring during the survey equipment
operations. All visual monitoring shall occur from the highest practical vantage points
aboard the survey vessel; binoculars shall be used to observe the surrounding areas,
as appropriate.

- 2-2 -
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

Table 2-1. OGPP Marine Wildlife Mitigation Measures

Condition Number Measure

i. For survey activities the [sic] require the collection of geophysical data of
nearshore ocean bottom areas, at least 21 calendar days prior to the
commencement of survey activities, the Permittee may petition the CLSC staff
for authorization to conduct survey operations with one MWM onboard. The
CSLC staff will evaluated such petitions on a case-by-case basis and, in
granting such authorization at its discretion, will consider factors as the timing
type, and location of the survey, the size of the survey vessel, the availability of
alternate vessels, and the ability of one MWM to effectively monitor the safety
zone.
ii. For survey activities where the only geophysical equipment used is operated at
a frequency at or above 200 kHz, one MWM will be required.
iii. MWMs will not be required aboard vessels conducting survey activities that
utilize, as the only form of geophysical equipment, non-pulse or non-acoustic
generating, passive survey equipment (e.g. Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV),
magnetometers, gravity meters).

Soft Start: The Permittee shall use a “soft start” technique at the beginning of survey
activities each day (or following a shut down) to allow any marine mammal that may
be in the immediate area to leave before the sound sources reaches full energy.
Condition 7(j)
Permittee shall initiate each piece of equipment at the lowest practical sound level,
increasing output in such a manner as to increase in steps not exceeding
approximately six decibels (dB) per five minute period.

If the geophysical survey equipment is operated at or above a frequency of 200 kHz,

safety zone monitoring/enforcement (MM-BIO 3) is not required; however, if
Condition 7(k) geophysical survey equipment operated at a frequency at or above 200 kHz is used
simultaneously with geophysical survey equipment less than 200 kHz, then the safety
zone for the equipment less than 200 kHz must be monitored.

Fishing gear interaction (MM Fish-2, Exhibit H): To minimize interaction with fishing
gear that may be present within a survey area: 1) the geophysical vessel (or
designated vessel) shall traverse the proposed survey corridor prior to commencing
survey operations to note and record the presence, type, and location of deployed fish
Condition 7(l)
gear (i.e., buoys); 2) No survey lines within 30 m (98 ft) of observed fishing gear shall
be conducted. The survey crew shall not remove or relocated any fish fear; removal
or relocation shall only be accomplished by the owner of the gear upon notification by
the survey operator of the potential conflict.

Collision reporting: In the event of a collision with a marine mammal or reptile the
Permittee shall abide by the reporting and procedure requirement listed in Exhibit D.
Condition 7(m)

Source: CSLC Low-Energy Offshore Geophysical Permit PRC 8391.9

- 2-3 -
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

3.0 METHODS

Three days prior to the initiation of the survey, Padre marine biologists contacted NOAA
Fisheries Long Beach office staff and local whale-watching groups to inquire about the species
and numbers of recently observed marine wildlife near the survey area. During survey operations,
the Marine Wildlife Monitor (MWM) onboard the survey vessel was responsible for observing
wildlife and their behaviors during transit and data collection operations. Monitoring conditions
and avoidance measures designed to decrease the potential impacts to marine wildlife were
implemented as detailed in the following sections.

3.1 PERSONNEL
The side scan sonar equipment was operated at frequencies greater than 200 kHz;
therefore, only one NOAA-approved Padre MWM was required during survey operations.
Jennifer Klaib was the MWM onboard the survey vessel on November 15 and 16, 2016, while
Patrick Crooks was the MWM onboard from November 17 through November 26, 2016.
Monitoring was conducted during all transit and side scan sonar operations.

3.2 FISHING GEAR CLEARANCE

In accordance with geophysical permit conditions, a fishing gear clearance was conducted
prior to the start of survey operations. The survey vessel traveled along the survey corridor to
confirm the presence and/or absence of fishing gear within the survey area. In addition, the
onboard MWM aided in the identification and avoidance of fishing gear during survey operations.

3.3 MONITORING METHODS

Monitoring occurred during all Project activities within State waters.
3.3.1 Vessel Transit
The survey vessel transited to and from Marina del Rey, California, to Survey Area 3, and
from Ventura Harbor, California to Survey Areas 1 and 2. During vessel transit, there was the
potential for encountering marine wildlife; therefore, a MWM was positioned at the highest safe
vantage point for a clear view of the ocean within the vessel’s path. To minimize the chance of
collision with, or disturbance of, marine wildlife, the MWM recommended that the vessel maintain
a minimum distance of 91 m (300 ft) from marine wildlife. If marine wildlife was observed within
the path of the transiting vessel, the monitor reported that observation to the vessel operator, who
slowed the vessel and/or changed course in order to avoid contact.
3.3.2 Survey Monitoring
Prior to the start of data collection, survey operators utilized a “soft start” technique to
allow any marine wildlife that may be in the survey area to leave before the sound source reached
full energy level. MWM was prepared with the appropriate safety and monitoring equipment to
conduct observations, including Nikon 7 x 50 low light reticulated binoculars for daytime and low
light observations. Survey activities were conducted during daylight hours only.
MWM visually scanned the general survey area near the survey vessel for wildlife
whenever survey equipment was operating. Per the OGPP requirements, no safety zone was

- 3-1 -
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

required during the side scan sonar sonar survey. When marine wildlife were observed, the MWM
identified the species, counted the number of individual animals present, observed the animals’
behavior, and the animals’ direction/speed of movement. The MWM recorded any distress
behaviors and implemented avoidance actions as discussed above, if necessary.

3.4 PINNIPED HAUL-OUTS

Survey Area 1 routes were adjacent to a known pinniped haul-out and/or rookery, the
Carpentaria harbor seal rookery. The survey was conducted in November 2016, which is outside
of pinniped mating and pupping season. As per Fugro’s OGPP permit, anytime the survey came
within 300 m (984 ft) of a pinniped haul-out, the following measures were implemented:
 The survey vessel did not approach within 91 m (300 ft) of the haul-out site;
 Survey activity adjacent to haul-out sites were conducted in an expedited manner to
minimize the potential for disturbance of pinniped on land; and
 The MWM monitored pinniped activity onshore as the vessel approaches, observing
and reporting on the number of pinnipeds disturbed (i.e., head lifting, flushing into the
water, and/or vocalizing in defense).

3.5 MARINE PROTECTED AREAS

Survey activities did not occur within any Marine Protected Areas (MPA). Survey Area 1
was located approximately 18.8 km (11.7 mi) north of the Scorpion MPA near Santa Cruz Island,
Survey Area 2 was located approximately 7.7 km (4.8 mi) northeast of the Anacapa MPA, and
Survey Area 3 was located approximately 2.6 km (1.6 mi) southwest of the Bolsa Chica Basin
MPA.

- 3-2 -
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

4.0 RESULTS

The following sections summarize the observations made by MWM and results of any
avoidance actions requested during the Project.

4.1 SPECIES OBSERVED

Throughout the survey period, a total of two species were observed: California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus) and common dolphin (Delphinus sp.). The survey operator used a “soft
start” technique at the beginning of survey activities to allow any marine mammal that may be in
the Project area to leave before the sound sources reach full energy. On November 22, 2016, 30
common dolphins were observed swimming toward the vessel during survey activities. The MWM
requested that the skipper slow the vessel speed to avoid encouraging bow riding behavior while
the survey equipment was collecting data. No distress behavior was observed. In addition, no
negative interaction occurred during vessel transit, and no avoidance actions were requested
from the MWM. Table 4-1 details the observation made during both transit and survey activities.

Table 4-1. Species Observations

No. of individuals No. of individuals Total

Species observed during observed during
Transit Survey

California sea lion 0 25 25

Common dolphin 25 50 75

4.2 FISHING GEAR

Prior to initiating data collection, a fishing gear clearance was completed within each
survey corridor. Several buoys associated with fishing gear were observed adjacent to the survey
corridor. The color and locations of the buoys were recorded and a 33 m (100 ft) avoidance radius
was implemented. No fishing gear was displaced or damaged during the survey period.

- 4-1 -
Fugro Pelagos, Inc.
Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report
Project No. 1602-2781

5.0 CONCLUSION

Two species of marine wildlife were observed during the DCOR side scan sonar survey
period. On one occasion, the MWM requested to implement an avoidance measure to discourage
marine wildlife from swimming adjacent to the operating equipment. Project activities were never
delayed or altered due to encroachment by marine wildlife, and no abnormal behaviors or
negative effects were observed. Based on the observations of the MWM, and the cooperative
efforts of the Fugro team and vessel crew, no negative Project-related effects to the marine wildlife
were observed during the survey period.

- 5-1 -
CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
FIELD OPERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE REPORT

B. EXHIBIT H

Fugro Document No. 23.00007195_CSLC_Report R0 Appendix B