Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2023.02.10 - Doc. 32 Motion To Reconsider Order Denying Appointment of Counsel
2023.02.10 - Doc. 32 Motion To Reconsider Order Denying Appointment of Counsel
2023.02.10 - Doc. 32 Motion To Reconsider Order Denying Appointment of Counsel
HOMESITE )
Petitioner )
v. ) Case No. 22CV06473
LUPARDUS )
Respondent )
I, LONNIE LUPARDUS, pro se litigant respectfully ask the court reconsider its denial to appoint
counsel, i.e. an attorney to represent me in this case. I understand that any false statements in this motion
will subject me to penalties of perjury. I understand that in civil cases, there is no constitutional right to an
appointed attorney. While the court may appoint an attorney to represent me, it does so only in rare cases.
I understand that in deciding whether to appoint an attorney, the court will consider a variety of factors,
including but not limited to the following: (1) the merits of my claims; (2) the nature and complexity of
factual and legal issues raised in the claims; (3) my ability to present the claims; (4) my financial ability to
pay an attorney; and (5) my diligence in attempting to secure an attorney. I understand that with regard to
the fifth factor, I must show that I have made a reasonably diligent effort under the circumstances to
obtain an attorney to represent me. I understand that the court=s Pro Se Guide (pages 26-27) suggests
possible ways to find an attorney and/or obtain legal advice. I understand that the court typically requires
that before seeking an appointed attorney, a plaintiff confers with (not merely contact) at least five
I have tried anyway possible to find counsel to represent me in this matter. I have contact the
Kansas Bar referral program, the Missouri Bar, the Oklahoma Bar, the Colorado Bar, the Texas Bar,
Kansas Legal Services, the Johnson County Courts, the University of Kansas School of Law, Washburn
School of Law, Missouri School of Law, I’ve contacted well over 250 attorneys/firms, called every
in this matter:
(https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Lupardus-Vs-Homesite-Insurance?from=mobviewjob&tk=1gou52th2ncf6
800&fromjk=59b507f394f6a6d5&attributionid=mobvjcmp).
You are the Judge in this case have the ability to ensure that both parties receive an equal and
level playing field in this dispute between the two; I implore you to reconsider the order denying the
motion to appoint counsel, and allow myself to be properly represented in my dispute against my insurer
as they are properly represented by an experienced attorney who understands the court system. I have
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of the above MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE ORDER DENYING
EFFORTS TO OBTAIN COUNSEL was emailed on the parties below on Feb 10, 2023 at 10:48 AM as
follows:
DCC-HelpCenter@jocogov.org
mbaumberger@klendalaw.com
Stacy.Crist@jocogov.org