Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rep#5
Rep#5
CE-213L
Experiment #5
Determination of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
Monday/Wednesday Group
August 13, y
On my honor I pledge that this work of mine does not violate the University provisions on
academic misconduct. By signing below, I certify that I understand the University Policies on
academic misconduct and that when an act of academic misconduct is committed, all parties
involved are in violation.
Signature: dalal, Maryam, Hessa, aljazi, Fatma
Abstract
i
Table of contents
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................i
Table of contents........................................................................................................................ii
List of Figures and Tables.........................................................................................................iii
Nomenclature.............................................................................................................................1
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................2
Summary...........................................................................................................................................2
Sources..............................................................................................................................................2
Significance.......................................................................................................................................2
Impact................................................................................................................................................3
Objective:...................................................................................................................................4
Theoretical background:.............................................................................................................5
Experimental details:..................................................................................................................7
Material &specimen:.........................................................................................................................7
Equipment:........................................................................................................................................7
Procedure:..........................................................................................................................................8
Results and Discussion:..............................................................................................................9
Results:..............................................................................................................................................9
Discussion:......................................................................................................................................10
Answers of Questions:.....................................................................................................................11
Conclusion:..............................................................................................................................13
Acknowledgments:...................................................................................................................14
References:...............................................................................................................................14
Appendix:.................................................................................................................................14
Grade of the report..................................................................................................................15
ii
List of Figures and Tables
iii
Nomenclature
1
Introduction:
Summary
Sources
Biodegradable waste.
Organic matter.
Microorganisms such as bacteria and protozoans.
Aquatic plants such as algae.
Significance
2
Impact
In general, the greater the BOD the more rapidly oxygen is depleted in
water. This means less oxygen is available to aquatic organisms which
can negatively implicate aquatic life as a whole.
Water with high BOD is considered low quality as far as aquatic life is
concerned.
It defines the strength of domestic wastes and industrial wastewaters.
3
Objective:
Determination of:
Ultimate BOD (BODU or Lo).
Reaction rate (k) using Thomas method.
4
Theoretical background:
The BOD value represents the amount of oxygen required
by bacteria to decompose aerobically the amount of organic
matter in a given period of time at a stated temperature. BOD is
the quantity of used in the aerobic stabilization of wastewater
and polluted water.
5
Volume of sample taken , ml
P = Volume of BOD bottle (¿ 300 ml)
1
BODu (mg/l) =Lo = 2
6A B
Where,
B=slope of the line
A=intercept of the line
6
Experimental details:
Material &specimen:
Sample: Wastewater
Equipment:
1. Special glass bottles (Winkler bottles) with volume of 300 ml preferably the
bottle and stoppers should be numbered.
2. Pipettes.
3. Graduated cylinders.
4 Measuring flasks.
5. Burettes.
6. Incubator.
7. Siphoning System apparatus.
8. Reagent
1. Alkali- Iodide Reagent.
2. Manganese sulfate (MnSO4 ).
3. Concentrated sulfuric Acid ( H 2SO4 ).
4. Stock solution of 0.1 N Sodium Thiosulphate (Na 2 S2 O3).
5. Standard Solution of 0.025 N Sodium Thiosulphate (Na 2 S2 O3).
6. Starch.
7
Procedure:
1. Prepare 300 ml bottle fill with sample.
2. Add 2 ml MnSO4 .
3. Add 2 ml alkali-Iodiode-azide solution.
4. Shake and leave for 5 min and see two layers appeared.
5. Add 2 ml Concentrated H 2SO4 .
6. Remove 100 ml from 300 ml.
7. Add1 ml starch.
8. Titrate using Na 2 S2 O3.
8
Results and Discussion:
Results:
Volume of sample = 30 mL
DOi = 9 mg/L
Volume of sample 30
P = Volume of BOD bottle = 300 = 0.1
Sample calculations:
DOi−DOf 0.8
BOD1 = P
= 0.1 = 8 mg/L
9
(t/BOD)^(1/3)
0.5800
f(x) = 0.0160876652271044 x + 0.492374316748618
0.5600
0.5400
t/(BOD)^(1/3)
0.5200
0.5000
0.4800
0.4600
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
time(day)
Figure 1: (t/BOD)1/3 vs t
B = 0.0161, A = 0.4924
6B 6(0.0161)
k= A = = 0.2 d-1
0.4924
1 1
BODu = 2 = 2 = 42.7 mg/L
6A B 6 ( 0.4924 ) (0.0161)
Discussion:
∆DO does not fall within the range of (2-7 mg/L) in the first two days due to
10
Answers of Questions:
2. Using the BODu and k values from your results, calculate the BOD at
day 9 at 15⁰C
k15 = k20 θT-20 = 0.2*(1.135)15-20 = 0.11 d-1
3. Given ultimate BOD = 250 mg/L, BOD at day 7 = 185 mg/L, calculate
the k value?
BOD7 = BODu (1-e-kt)
k = 0.192 d-1
Volume of sample x
P = Volume of BOD bottle = 300 = 0.01667 → volume of sample = 5 mL
11
5. The value of k determines the speed of BOD reaction. What do you
know about k value?
The value of k depends on the temperature, the nature of the waste, and the
ability of the organisms to utilize the waste. The higher the temperature, the
more active organism are, and so the higher the k value. The k value ranges
between 0.1 to 0.5 d-1, depending on the organic molecules. Simple compounds
have higher k values while complex compounds have lower k values.
b. Titrant: Na2S2O3
12
Conclusion:
This experiment was beneficial as we learned how to use the Thomas method to
determine BOD and how to get K 20 in case the temperature wasn’t at 20°C. The
results of DO0, DO1, DO2 and DO5 is 0 mg/L, 0.8 mg/L, 1.3 mg/L and 2.7 mg/L
respectivily. BODu and k were measured by Thomas method. The reaction rate
constant (k) must fall within the range 0.1-0.5d. Our value is 0.2d-1 so k is
within the range and the quality is poor. (Do,-Do,) value must fall between 2-7
mg/L so BOD0, BOD1, BOD2 and BOD5 are out of the range. The BODu value is
42.7 mg/L. The higher the BOD, the lower the quality of the water and therefore
the more negatively it impacts the environment.
13
Acknowledgments:
We would like to thank Eng. Latifa who helped us with the report and the
graph. Also, for her help throughout the experiment and understand the
material very well.
References:
Appendix:
14
Grade of the report
Abstract 2
Table of contents 2
Nomenclature 2
Introduction
Summary 2
Sources 2
Significance 2
Impacts 2
Objectives 2
Theoretical background 2
Experimental details
Procedure 3
Results 5
Answers of questions 10
Discussion 2
Conclusion 2
Acknowledgements 2
References 2
Appendix 2
15