Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Germans at El Amarna 1911 1914
Germans at El Amarna 1911 1914
95
f'
,
I
contents
FEATURES
GERMANS AI EL AMARNA
19tt-t9t4
by Suzanne Voss & Thomas L. Gertzen
AN EXACT FACSIMILE OF
THE BURIAL CHAMBER OF KV62
GIFTED TO EGYPT
EGYPT IN ANTWERP
by Luc y G o rd"a n -Ras t elli
Photo Essay
ROYAL WOMEN: DEIR EL BAHARI
by George B. Johnson
DEPARTMENTS
ffi rdttort Report
d& Nit" Currents W ro. the Record
I'hc pairicd the [Ancient] Egyptian Language), under its chairman, Adolf
I
l-e.l.t,
bust of Ntl'ertiti,
stt<tn o.fkr its dis- Erman (1854-1937). As professor of Egyptology at the Fried- :
§i
coycrl'; l. [o r:.
rich-Wilhelms-University (today's Humboldt University) and *
flcr-rrrrtnlt Rrtrt hc. t
Paul Holkmdtr €" director of Berlin's Egyptian Museum, Erman was probably I
unirkntificd rcis.
the most influential figure in Egyptology at that time, and it
Courtesy of Albert-Lud- F:
tl
:i
:!
::
ian architecture. In order to resolve the stalemate, Bor-
chardt decided to search for a site which would be less er-
pensive to excavate than Abusir had proven to be.
Borchardt considered keeping an eye on the anrr,
quities trade in Egypt part and parcel of his scholarll- rnis-
sion. An astute observer, he had begun to notice as earh-
as I906 the appearance of an increasing number of ob1er:.
on the antiquities market from E1 Amarna, the site of rhe
new capital city (Akhetaten) founded by Akhenaten in h-.
fifth regnal year (ca. 1350 B.C.) The art o[ the Heretics
reign was already familiar to Egyprologists. Since Napole-
on's day French and British archaeologists had excavated
the zone between rhe modern villages of El Hagg eandil
(above one resldential area of Akhenaten's citv) and E1 Ti,,
Kmt38
i
§
E
I
I
!_
One of the most impressive pieces was a bust of
Akhenaten acquired by the Louvre in 1905.1 Another was
the quartzite head of a princess, which Borchardt saw in
the collection of a certain Capt. Timins in Cairo. When it
changed hands following the German mission's discovery
of the studio-complex of the sculptor Thutmose in L9I2
(see below), its value increased by a phenomenal 4,300
percent!2
.,:
i
I
I
I
T
J
i
e
i
I
i
I
t
immediate direction. Until 1914 Borchardt's staff
consisted of his assistants Hans Abel (1883-1927)
and Friedrich Roesch; Captain (from 1913,
Major) Paul Timme, on leave from the German
army; the government site-foreman (Re gierungs-
baumeister) Dietrich Marcks (brother of the sculp-
tor Gerhard Marcks, who was associated succes-
sively with the Berliner Secession, Deutscher Werle-
bund and tL.e Bauhaus); Karl Breith, A. Mark,
Walther Honroth, Paul Hollander, Karl Dubois
and Hellmut Kirmse, along with Eglptologists
Möller and Hermann Ranke (1878-1953), who
later compiled the dictionary of ancient Egyptian
personal names a standard reference work
- -
and was for a time (1938-1942) a visiting profes-
sor at Philadelphia University in Pennsylvania.
Kmt44
provided the first illustration of what has become, in the
§ n the summer of 19L2, however, Simon urged Bor- interim, the most famous work of ancient Egyptian art,
H chardt to move on, to excavate the temples area, where the painted-limestone bust of Queen Nefertiti.T Additional
U he anticipated there would be more finds. Borchard.t finds from the Thutmose compound including the
cleverly arranged to visit the Louvre with Simon, while on
-
many so-called plaster "masks," which still defy adequate
a visit to Paris in the autumn of 1912. Georges B6n6dite interpretation a century later continued to turn up dur-
(1857-1926), director of the Egyptian department, accom- -
ing the following week. Shortly before Borchardt departed
I
panied them in the galleries of Egyptian art, where Bor- for Cairo, he confided in a letter to Mimi: "Amenhotep lV
chardt could call the DOG benefactor's attention to the andhis family begin to bore me alarmingly."
bust of Akhenaten which had earlier attracted his interest When German Eg)?tologist Baron Friedrich Wil-
(see p. 43, above) and to other finds presumed to derive helm von Bissing (1873-1956) Borchardt's archenemy8
from a sculptor's studio. (Pierre Lacau, 1873-1963, who
-
heard about the spectacular finds in P 47 .2.,he in-
later became head of the Egyptian Antiquities Service, was
-
stantly informed the French Antiquities inspector at Asyut,
also a member of the party.) Gustav Lefebvre (187 9-L957), whose jurisdiction included
Thanks to this ruse by Borchardt, when the work El Amarna. Borchardt feared that the concession could be
resumed in October 1912, Simon allowed it could contin- lost; but, nonetheless, he triumphantly inquired of Erman:
ue as originally planned, within the residential area along "Shall I still move on to excavate the temple district or palace
High Priest's Street, and to the north of the wadi running lrather than continue in the residential areal?" The cam-
east-west. paign ended with Honroth, Hollander and Timme survey-
The first object to be discovered was an unfinish- ing at Tüna el Gebel. The division which awarded the bust
ed limestone statuette of a king wearing the hhepresh crown of Nefertiti to James Simon took place onJanuary 20,19L3,
(most probably Akhenaten), with a smaller figure sitting roto: Aidan Dodson
Saapsho* taheaatthe
El Amama site p47.2
iluring the visit o/
Pnnce GeorgoJ§ax-
otry €,'hß yarty. Cloch-
wise frow *pleft:
Ranhr & Borc.hardt {x)
examine finds, inclufl-
ing aplaster "mask";
ßorchariltwith apria-
cess head; Ilans von
Berlepschholds ahead
oJ Ahhznaten (N ef€rtiti
bust inbaehground);
Pince'syarty with
,
shattered Ahhenaten
bust in foregroanil; at
Egrptiaa officialhold-
ingthe Ahhewtenhead.
Courtssy Alb€rt-Lud$iigs-Uni-
vorslty, Freiburg
'
Kmt46
I
I
and was atterrded by Lefebvre, representing
the Antiqui_ man described it as tantamount to robbery In
ties Sen ice.q A second division was made Gardiner,s
i.-n Cairo on the Ietter of Augusr 13, 1920 to Erman he *.äte: .,At qll
basis ofphotographs of the objects, since events
the excavations the presupposition which lay at the base of
had closed down by the time the date was my advocacy of
announced, and our El-Amarna application was my criticism
the participants had already ieft El Amarna. that simply änd
sole-ly on account of the wa4the cincession formerly giantra
to the DOG had irretrieyably lapsed,, and. tiat
, 'i ,, hat turned out to be the final season of excava- therefore free to-be competeafoi Uy excayating
the site was
' .:
r:.: tions for the German team at
EI Arnarna ran from museums. I will particularly ash you to note
societies and
:,.:.: ::: November 1913 until
March the following year.
ihat I hnow
Besides extending exploration to the eastern from Mfonsieur]. Lacau to be a jact, namely that prior to
alabaster oyr oltn application for El_Amarna there w ere
quarries, Borchardt,s team proceeded according . .j no
[ . less
to plan,
continuing rhe excavation in the remainder oflhe
iesrden- ly fo", separate applications for that site representing three
different countrtes.
tial area, quadrate by quadrate. On High priest,s Under these circumstances itbecame sim_
Street, ply a-matter of scientific expediency qs to which
they cleared the estate of General Ram-ose, whose applicant
house should attain-the site. lf thi Egtpt Exploration
was richly decorated with wali paintings. The Society has in_
final divi_ si-sted strength upon its supenoi claim, it
sion of finds from the German excavati-ons took is notbecause we
place on claim to excqyqte_wrth great-er shill than anyone
February 5, IgI4. else, though
in this respect I thinh w e hold a high stand.ärd, but
Among non_Egyptologists, Ludrvig Borchardt because as
is regards publication our [standardl] isbeyond
remembered as the archaeologist respor-rsibie reproach and
for the sen_ because (with professor petrie) we stand"almost
sational discoveries in the compounä belonging alone in this
to the respect."
master sculptor Thutmose _ above all, the
painted bust
of Akhenaten's queen. After the third campaign,
even be_
f,1]ffi+*
fore the excavations ceased, Erman .o,rg.ätuLted l:;-fi1
Bo._ ':+Je
chardt on rhe fulfillment of his ,,life,s *it .,,
But in a letter
wrl_u:n onJanuary 3, 1913, Borchardt begged
to differ
u'it1-r him: "l hope yotr do not considr, *, iirru*ptttous if I
rtrrrsrder- what you call my ,life\ worh, or.rly o ,r.rnit po, t iJ
it
- rrr c1 o1 o third." He continued ,,The
, fact that I was lichy
,- ,,r,r hiir:l good guesses about where and. what E*glisfu Egyptologisr
to excayate is
.,:.... ., ,;.rri grdttfying, but what about Aktn 11. Ga"rdinei
the scholqrly qnalysis
-
., .i r ., : ., r.,, r r i. I -{nd the institute?
ffsre-1e63)
C oincid.en c e qnd- inclinä_
rr,rir,,. -,.,., -. lr rnr t eal li.fe\ w orh, but
neither is making muclt
heai7r,.r'.
47 Kmt
English. In his autobiography, published nearly a decade at the Griffith Institute, Orford.
later, he described the "English method" as "simple in Photographic illustrations were generousll. proride:
form
and certainly not as comprehensiye as [German] scholars Lars Petersen from the Department of Classical Archaeologr. :-.,
would demand."to bert-Ludwigs-Universir),, Frelburg, r,vho had previously publis -,
Gardiner had also noted in the same letter cited ed them togetherwith additional images tnFreiburger Unircr.s_-
tatsblatter 194, )0ll, 79-93.
above that the Germans had gone to El Amarna because
The reconstruction of the history of the German err"-
they were interested in "the acquisition of valuable objects,,,
vations at E1 Amarna draws upon S. Voss's monograph in pres:
a supposition which Erman rejected in his response of Au-
detailing the history of the Cairo branch of the German Archa;,
gust 24, 1920: " . . . on the contralj. We w ent to Amarna to ological Institute down until 1929: Die Geschichte der Abteilu,.,
learn something about the appearance of aNew Kingdom city Kairo des DAI im Spannungsfeld deutscher politischer lnteressen
as a whole and in detail." Interestingly, Erman defends Vol. I . I BBl bis 1929, Menschen - KulttLren - Traditionen. Stttdicr.
Borchardt's interest in the architectural history of ancient aus den F orschungsclustern dts D eutschen Arcltäolo gischen hsair;:..
E$pt, although his claim that "if we have foundfine objects The Gardiner,Grman post-war correspondence uill b.
discussed in detail b1. T. Gertzen in an article in preparation [..:
Jor the museLlms, that was a pleasure for us but nonetheless
merely an encore" seems not entirely convincing, especially publication ln 2013, in the volume of papers read at the confer-
ence "Disciplinary Measures? Histories of Egyptology in Multi-
as regards the painted bust of Nefertiti.
disciplinarv Contexr," which was held in London, l0-12June.
Gardiner, still embittered by Erman,s reproaches,
2010.
nonetheless tried to de-escalate the confrontation in his
followup letter of September 3, l92O: "I haye the greatest '1,:.:
f ..
This article is based on research in the archives of the German the History of Science Dept., Humboldt Unir.ersity, Berlin. His
Archaeological Institute and ir-r the Swiss Institute for Egyptian thesis, titled Ecole fu Berlin und Gttldmes Zeitalter (l\B2-jgj+)
Architectural History ancl Archaeologli both in Cairo, ancl in the der Ag,ptologie als Wis.sensch aJt, das Lehrer-Schäler-yerhaltnis t,ott
State and University Library,, of the city of Bremen, German1,, 2nfl G. Ebers, A. Erman und K. Sethe , is in press.
Kmt48
.)