Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 1
Group 1
by:
APRIL 2023
1
INTRODUCTION
One of the key components that gives a city its personality, identity, and
perception of the past, present, and future is its heritage. A key factor and driver of historical,
economic, and social growth is built cultural legacy. As historical and cultural evidence, the
urban building stock and its connotative meanings play a significant role in the city. Yet,
constraints on the constructed urban assets have increased due to technological, demographic,
and economic developments as well as a lack of systematic evaluation procedures for
properly taking into account the conflict between sustainable urban growth and the
preservation of cultural heritage (Sofianou & Bagiouk, 2020).
Most cities have historic landmarks and structures they want to preserve and
reinvigorate as they symbolize certain historical, political and/or economic events. These
landmarks also serve as part of tourism and are an important component of the city’s
economy (Sandbhor & Botre, 2013). Heritage buildings still in use have more potential to be
further developed and utilized. Furthermore, according to Sandbhor & Botre (2013), if the
structure is not restored in due time, the original condition and performance of the building
would worsen and prove to be damper on the efforts of any future development.
Revitalization strategies are used to preserve heritage structures, they not only
work to preserve the structure itself but also the original builders' time, effort, and dedication.
The goal of revitalizing heritage buildings in architecture is to strike a compromise between
preserving existing structures and the necessity to suit modern needs, particularly those
related to space and finances. Through compatible reuse and appropriate assessment methods,
architectural heritage buildings can retain their original facades, historical patterns, layouts,
architectural elements, and historical associations while also contributing to a modern urban
environment and meeting the functional requirements associated with that environment (Li et
al., 2021).
1. Is there a significant difference between the old Laperal White House and the
current upscale fine dine “Joseph’s” in terms of:
a. Historical value
b. Architectural value
c. Cultural value
d. Ecological value
3. How effectively does the revitalized Laperal White House serve its current
purpose?
This study will benefit the community, especially the businesses surrounding
the heritage building, for increased tourism due to revitalization. The findings can be used as
a basis for other heritage building repairs or revitalizations, and will serve as reference to
architects and builders. Furthermore, the findings of the study will be useful for future studies
on the heritage building revitalization.
This study limits itself to a certain heritage building, the “Laperal White
House”, located in Baguio City. This case study is based on two Sustainable Development
Goals (SDG), specifically Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure (SDG #9) and Sustainable
Cities and Communities (SDG #11) (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, n.d.). It is
conducted to determine the effectiveness of the revitalized old Laperal White House.
3
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The respondents of this study will be the population along the area of the
Laperal White House and people who already visited the heritage building.
The researchers will use purposive sampling as its method to determine the
respondents for the study.
Before the research is conducted, the researchers will give a letter to the management
of “Joseph’s Restaurant” to ask for the approval to conduct the study in their vicinity. The
researchers will make use of the Post Occupancy Evaluation to make structured observations
on determining the condition of the revitalized heritage building. The researchers will ask the
prospective respondents if they are willing to participate in the study beforehand and then
inform them what the study is all about. The researchers then will start to hand-out the
questionnaires to obtain their perceptions.
Data Analysis
Using the gathered data, the results of the Building Condition Assessment will
be summarized.
For the comparison of the old Laperal White House and the revitalized Laperal
White House, the answers of the respondents for each question which corresponds to the old
and revitalized building and the answers of the respondents will be categorized accordingly.
The researchers will average the answers and compare the means using the statistical tool,
two-sample t-test, to obtain if there is a significant difference between the old and revitalized
Laperal White House.
4
Σ𝑑
𝑡 = 2 2
𝑛(Σ𝑑 )−(Σ𝑑)
𝑛−1
where:
𝑑 = difference per paired value
n = number of samples
5
REFERENCES
Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E.D. (2011, November 08). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings.
Structural Survey, 29(5), 411-421. Retrieved February 27, 2023, from
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02630801111182439/full/html
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). The 17 Sustainable Goals. Sustainable
Development. Retrieved February 27, 2023, from Department of Economic and
Social Affairs
Gloria, G. (2016, July 07). The horrific histories of Philippine haunted houses. CNN Life.
Retrieved February 27, 2023, from
https://www.cnnphilippines.com/life/entertainment/film/2016/06/09/philippine-haunte
d-houses.html
Li, Y., Zhao, L., Huang, J., & Law, A. (2021, May 04). Research frameworks, methodologies,
and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a
review. Built Heritage. Retrieved February 27, 2023, from
https://built-heritage.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43238-021-00025-x
Okba, E. M., & Embaby, M. E. (2013, August). Sustainability and Heritage Buildings.
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 2(8),
1682-1690. Retrieved February 27, 2023, from
https://www.ijert.org/research/sustainability-and-heritage-buildings-IJERTV2IS80508
.pdf?fbclid=IwAR15_4nuCPN3u5SZBc-6qKdIgtJAHS-rTRL4A2FA0zIy5Vt-tmyo17
o3h_4
Penića, M., Svetlana, G., & Murgul, V. (2015, September 03). Revitalization of Historic
Buildings as an Approach to Preserve Cultural and Historical Heritage. Procedia
Engineering, 117, 883-890. Retrieved February 27, 2023, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705815018196?fbclid=IwAR
1J3104vG0yhEjHVlG74lf9eCpXyUEcV-c-Z085UjnM4q7tGlK2UJ9j3-c
Sofianou, E., & Bagiouk, S. (2020, April). Historic buildings and urban area revitalisation
through placemaking: A case study. International Journal of Novel Research in Civil
Structural and Earth Sciences, 7(1), 17-30. Retrieved February 27, 2023, from
https://www.noveltyjournals.com/upload/paper/Historic%20buildings%20and%20urb
an%20area-2215.pdf
Yacob, Syamilah & Ali, Azlan & Au-Yong, Cheong Peng. (2016). Building Condition
Assessment: Lesson Learnt from Pilot Projects. MATEC Web of Conferences. 66.
00072. 10.1051/matecconf/20166600072.
6
Gordian. (2023). The Building Condition Assessment: 4 Options for Successful Data
Collection. Retrieved from Gordian:
https://www.gordian.com/resources/building-condition-assessment-options.
MacCuspie, R. I., Hyman, H., Yakymyshyn, C., Srinivisan, S. S., Dhau, J., & Drake , C.
(2014). A framework for identifying performance targets for sustainable
nanomaterials. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 17-25.