Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microeconomics Theory and Applications 12th Edition Browning Test Bank 1
Microeconomics Theory and Applications 12th Edition Browning Test Bank 1
Microeconomics Theory and Applications 12th Edition Browning Test Bank 1
1. In an attempt to encourage the use of solar energy, the government pays a part of the price of
solar panels to the producer and allows consumers to buy as many panels as they wish at the
subsidized price. This is an example of a(n) _____.
a. excise subsidy
b. fixed-quantity subsidy
c. voucher program
d. lump-sum transfer
Answer: A
Answer: C
Answer: C
a. An excise subsidy has both an income and a substitution effect which causes the consumption
of the subsidized good to rise.
b. An excise subsidy has a substitution effect since the subsidy artificially lowers the price of the
subsidized good causing the consumer to increase consumption of the good, but no income
effect.
c. An excise subsidy increases consumption of a good by the same quantity as does a cash
transfer but at a lower cost to the government.
d. An excise subsidy has an income effect since the subsidy increases the consumer’s income but
no substitution effect.
Answer: A
5. If an equal-cost lump-sum transfer were substituted for a per unit excise subsidy on good X:
a. the consumption of X under the excise subsidy would be higher and the consumer would be on
a higher indifference curve.
b. the consumption of X under the excise subsidy would be higher, but the consumer would be
on the same indifference curve.
c. the consumption of X under the lump-sum transfer would be higher and the consumer would
be on a higher indifference curve.
d. the consumption of X under the lump-sum transfer could be higher, but the cost of the transfer
would be higher.
Answer: C
a. An excise subsidy has a positive substitution effect but negative income effect on the
consumption of the subsidized good.
b. An excise subsidy increases consumption of the subsidized good more than a cash transfer of
equal-cost.
c. An excise subsidy leaves the well-being of the subsidy recipient unchanged.
d. An excise subsidy causes consumption of nonsubsidized goods to increase.
Answer: B
7. Compared to an equal-cost cash grant, an excise subsidy on clothing results in the purchase
of:
a. more clothing and more of other goods.
b. less clothing and more of other goods.
c. more clothing and less of other goods.
d. less clothing and less of other goods.
Answer: C
8. Figure 5-1 shows the preferences of a consumer for food and other goods. He is initially in
equilibrium at point A where the budget line MN is tangent to the indifference curve.
. In Figure 5-1, the total outlay on food before the excise subsidy is given by _____.
a. KC
b. 0G
c. 0H
d. 0J
Answer: B
a. 0M
b. 0N
c. 0E
d. 0G
Answer: C
10. Figure 5-1 shows the preferences of a consumer for food and other goods. He is initially in
equilibrium at point A where the budget line MN is tangent to the indifference curve.
In Figure 5-1, the total cost incurred by the government on the lump-sum transfer is given by
_____.
a. CE’
b. BF
c. CH
d. BJ
Answer: A
11. The effect of substituting an equal-cost lump-sum grant for an excise subsidy is to:
a. increase the consumption of the subsidized good and increase the consumption of other goods.
b. decrease the consumption of the subsidized good and increase the consumption of other goods.
c. decrease the consumption of the subsidized good and decrease the consumption of other
goods.
d. increase the consumption of the subsidized good and decrease the consumption of other goods.
Answer: B
a. the budget line for a cash grant shifts such that it is tangent to the same indifference curve so
that the well-being of the consumer is the same.
b. the slope of the budget line for a cash grant is positive.
c. the budget line for a cash grant is parallel to the original budget line.
d. the budget line for an excise subsidy shifts such that it is tangent to the same indifference
curve so that the well-being of the consumer is the same.
Answer: C
Answer: C
Answer: A
Answer: D
16. Which of the following is a consequence of subsidizing consumers using a per-unit excise
subsidy for the purchase of some good or service as opposed to a lump-sum payment of an equal
amount?
a. Consumers will not necessarily be better off according to their own preferences.
b. The deadweight loss from over-consumption of the good or service is avoided.
c. Consumers will move to a higher indifference curve.
d. Consumers’ purchase decisions will be based on their true valuation of the good.
Answer: A
a. increase employment.
b. make workers better off.
c. not change workers’ welfare.
d. cause average wages to fall.
Answer: B
18. Figure 5-2 shows the quantity demanded of a good at various prices. Refer to Figure 5-2.
The deadweight loss of an excise subsidy that lowers the price from P1 to P2 is area _____.
a. P1ACP2
b. P1BCP2
c. ADC
d. ABC
Answer: D
19. Figure 5-2 shows the quantity demanded of a good at various prices. Based on Figure 5-2,
the welfare cost of an excise tax (that raises price from P2 to P1) is the area _____.
a. P1ACP2
b. P1BCP2
c. ADC
d. ABC
Answer: C
Answer: A
21. In which of the following cases can a subsidy possibly harm its recipients?
Answer: A
Answer: C
23. A subsidy can actually cause the consumption of subsidized goods to fall if:
Answer: D
Answer: D
25. Figure 5-4 shows a family’s preferences for public and private healthcare. Refer to Figure 5-
4. Suppose the government offers a fixed quantity subsidy of healthcare valued at $B0. The new
budget line becomes _____.
a. MAS
b. MATN
c. MN
d. AS
Answer: B
26. Suppose the government provides $1,400 worth of educational services for all children.
Assume that public schooling cannot be supplemented with private tutoring. What would be the
cost of schooling for a family that desires educational services worth $1,700?
a. $0
b. $300
c. $1,700
d. Cannot be determined without more information
Answer: C
a. Consumers are better off with a fixed-quantity subsidy than an equal-cost voucher system.
b. Voucher systems will not increase the quantity consumed of the subsidized good.
c. With a fixed-quantity subsidy consumers will consume more of other goods.
d. Fixed-quantity subsidies and voucher systems can both place the consumer on a higher
indifference curve.
Answer: D
28. A family's preferences toward schooling, before and after a fixed-quantity subsidy, are
shown in Figure 5-5. Prior to the subsidy, the family is in equilibrium at point J. Assume that
public schooling cannot be supplemented with private tutoring. Refer to Figure 5-5. After the
fixed-quantity subsidy has been introduced, the family consumes:
Answer: B
Difficulty Level: Medium
Section Reference: Public Schools and the Voucher Proposal
Learning Objective: Analyze how a voucher program would affect the quantity of educational
services chosen by parents for their children.
29. A family's preferences toward schooling, before and after a fixed-quantity subsidy, are
shown in Figure 5-5. Prior to the subsidy, the family is in equilibrium at point J. Assume that
public schooling cannot be supplemented with private tutoring. Refer to Figure 5-5. The fixed-
quantity subsidy reduces schooling by _____.
a. G0
b. B0
c. BG
d. H0
Answer: C
30. A family's preferences toward schooling, before and after a fixed-quantity subsidy, are
shown in Figure 5-5. Prior to the subsidy, the family is in equilibrium at point J. Assume that
public schooling cannot be supplemented with private tutoring. Refer to Figure 5-5. Public
schooling provided in the amount of B0 causes the family to increase consumption of other
goods by _____.
a. MC
b. MH
c. M0
d. CH
Answer: B
31. A family's preferences toward schooling, before and after a fixed-quantity subsidy, are
shown in Figure 5-5. Prior to the subsidy, the family is in equilibrium at point J. Assume that
public schooling cannot be supplemented with private tutoring. Refer to Figure 5-5. Public
schooling provided in the amount of B0 causes the family to consume _____ of other goods.
a. MC
b. MH
c. M0
d. CH
Answer: C
32. A family's preferences toward schooling, before and after a fixed-quantity subsidy, are
shown in Figure 5-5. Prior to the subsidy, the family is in equilibrium at point J. Assume that
public schooling cannot be supplemented with private tutoring. Refer to Figure 5-5. Suppose the
government offers education vouchers of value $B0 instead of a fixed-quantity subsidy. The
budget line will become _____.
a. MATN
b. AS
c. MN
d. MAS
Answer: D
33. Assume an indifference map with other goods on the vertical axis and health on the
horizontal axis. The government provides families with $400 vouchers that can be redeemed for
healthcare services at any hospital, public or private. The budget line for a family that avails this
voucher scheme will:
a. be negatively sloped.
b. be positively sloped up to $400 and then have a zero slope.
c. have a zero slope up to $400 and then have a negative slope.
d. be a straight line with an infinite slope.
Answer: C
34. Suppose a local government decides to increase taxes on its residents and use that money to
provide meals to each individual in the community. The scheme provides each individual with a
small frozen dinner. Compared to a voucher system that allows individuals to purchase meals at
a private restaurant, the frozen dinner scheme:
Answer: B
35. Compared to a system of providing education free of cost at government schools, a voucher
program that provides the means for parents to send their school-age children to private schools
at government expense:
a. will allow families to consume a higher quantity and better quality of education.
b. will lower the quality of education provided.
c. will not affect the quantity and quality of education.
d. will result in a lower quantity of education consumed.
Answer: A
36. All-you-can-eat restaurants charge a fixed price that permits unlimited access to prepared
food. Suppose food consumption is on the horizontal axis and all other goods on the vertical axis.
If the restaurant charges $10 per meal while the price of all other goods is $20, restaurant patrons
will consume to a point on their indifference curve where their marginal rate of substitution of
food for all other goods is equal to _____.
a. 2
b. 1/2
c. 10
d. 0
Answer: D
37. One of the possible explanations for why more trash is generated in cities is that _____.
Answer: D
38. An increase in the price per unit for trash disposal from zero to a positive quantity causes the
budget line to change from:
Answer: B
39. Which of the following policies would work best towards reducing traffic jams?
a. Relaxation of government restrictions on the number of cars being produced and sold
b. A reduction in interest rates on car loans
c. The imposition of a marginal fee to use certain roads during peak traffic hours
d. A levy of a fixed annual payment by car owners as traffic congestion fees
Answer: C
40. Which of the following groups are better off under an annual fee system of garbage
disposal?
Answer: D
41. Consider a two-year period where a consumer has an income of $10,000 in year 1 and
$8,000 in year 2. The consumer can borrow or lend at a rate of 10 percent. If the consumer
decides to save $1,000 in year 1, it means:
Answer: B
a. $35,000
b. $20,000
c. $35,750
d. $34,250
Answer: D
43. Consider the income and consumption of an individual between two time periods. If
consumption in period 2 (C2) is on the horizontal axis, consumption in period 1 (C1) is on the
vertical axis, and the interest rate is 11 percent, the slope of the budget constraint must be _____.
a. 0.11
b. 0.9
c. 1.11
d. 11
Answer: B
44. Other things remaining the same, in the intertemporal consumer choice model a change in
the endowment point:
Answer: A
Difficulty Level: Medium
Section Reference: The Consumer’s Choice to Save or Borrow
Learning Objective: Develop an intertemporal model that illuminates the consumer’s choice to
save or borrow and shows how changes in the consumer’s endowment and the interest rate affect
that choice.
Answer: A
46. In a two-year period, suppose Gloria has $10,000 in income in year 1 and $4,300 in income
in year 2. In order to maintain her optimal consumption of $8,000 in year 1 and $6,500 in year 2,
she can borrow or lend at a rate of 10 percent. If Gloria's income stream changes such that she
earns $3,000 in Year 1 and $12,000 in Year 2, the budget line will:
Answer: D
47. Suppose consumption in year 2 (C2) is on the horizontal axis and consumption in year 1 (C1)
is on the vertical axis. An increase in the interest rate:
a. makes borrowers better off and lenders worse off.
b. causes more people to shift their consumption from year 2 to year 1.
c. causes the budget line to rotate outward along the horizontal axis.
d. will reduce savings in year 2.
Answer: C
48. In the intertemporal consumer choice model, an increase in _____ will alter the slope of the
budget line.
a. saving
b. the interest rate
c. future income
d. borrowing
Answer: B
49. An individual is considering consumption in two periods. He has decided to borrow $1,000
in period 1, given his endowment and the interest rate. Other things remaining the same, if the
interest rate increases, he will:
Answer: A
50. Consider an individual for whom consumption in two periods is a normal good. Other things
remaining the same, if the interest rate increases, then:
a. he is worse off.
b. he is better off.
c. he will spend more in each period.
d. he will choose to save more.
Answer: B
51. Fred is considering consumption between two periods and is earning an income of $1,000 in
both periods. If the interest rate is 8 percent, Fred borrows $500, but if the interest rate rises to 18
percent, Fred saves $500. Is this behavior economically reasonable?
a. No, Fred would borrow less because of the higher interest rate but would still borrow a
positive amount.
b. No, Fred might not borrow at all, but would not start saving. If Fred wanted to save he would
have saved at the lower interest rate too.
c. Yes, the change in interest rates will cause his endowment point to shift, allowing him to
become a saver.
d. Yes, the higher interest rate will raise the cost of current consumption, inducing him to cut
back current consumption. He could cut back so much that he becomes a saver.
Answer: D
52. In a two-year period, if a higher interest rate causes consumption in year 1 to rise:
a. the income effect associated with the higher interest rate is greater than the substitution effect.
b. the substitution effect associated with the higher interest rate is greater than the income effect.
c. the income effect of the higher interest rate is negative.
d. the substitution effect of the higher interest rate is positive.
Answer: A
53. When comparing T-bills and stocks, a risk-averse investor may choose to invest in T-bills
although stocks give higher average returns because _____.
Answer: B
54. Brenda starts a business for $150,000 that gives her a 50% chance of losing and a 50%
chance of gaining an expected annual return of $75,000. John is content with a job that pays him
$75,000 per year with near certainty; there is only about a 1% chance of losing his job each year.
Suppose risk is on the horizontal axis and return on the vertical axis, Brenda’s indifference curve
for risk and return:
Answer: A
55. Suppose Microsoft stock will provide either a return of 10 or 20 percent over the next year
and that the probability of the former outcome is 0.25 while the probability of the latter is 0.75.
The expected return on Microsoft stock over the next year is thus _____%.
a. 15
b. 12.5
c. 17.5
d. 20
Answer: C
56. Suppose Microsoft stock will provide either a return of 10 or 20 percent over the next year
and that the probability of the former outcome is 0.25 while the probability of the latter is 0.75. If
the utility an investor derives from a 10 percent return on Microsoft stock is 200 and the utility
the investor derives from a 20 percent return is 400, the investor's expected utility from holding
Microsoft stock is _____.
a. 300
b. 350
c. 250
d. 400
Answer: B
a. the summed value of each possible rate of return discounted for inflation
b. the average probability of profit on a fair investment
c. the expected probability of high returns on an investment
d. the summed value of each possible rate of return weighted by its probability
Answer: D
Answer: A
59. For a risk-averse individual, with return on the X-axis and total utility on the Y-axis, the
slope of the total utility curve:
Answer: C
60. For a risk-loving individual, with return on the X-axis and total utility on the Y-axis, the
slope of the total utility curve:
Answer: A
61. For a risk-neutral individual, with return on the X-axis and total utility on the Y-axis, slope
of the total utility curve:
Answer: B
a. prefers a sure return to an uncertain prospect generating the same expected return
b. is indifferent between a sure return and an uncertain prospect generating the same expected
return
c. will forgo a sure return in favor of an uncertain prospect generating the same expected return
d. will avoid all risky investments no matter what the return
Answer: A
a. prefers a sure return to an uncertain prospect generating the same expected return
b. is indifferent between a sure return and an uncertain prospect generating the same expected
return
c. will forgo a sure return in favor of an uncertain prospect generating the same expected return
d. will avoid all risky investments no matter what the return
Answer: B
64. A risk-averse individual who owns a $200,000 house and faces the prospect that the house
will burn down with the probability 0.05 in any given year will be willing to pay how much of an
annual premium to fully insure against such a loss?
a. $5,000
b. More than $10,000
c. No more than $5,000
d. Either more or less than $10,000 depending on whether housing is a normal or inferior good
for the individual
Answer: B
Answer: C
a. This compensation scheme reduces the level of risk in his portfolio since he is employed at the
same company.
b. This compensation scheme provides Walter a good means of minimizing financial risk since
he can hold stock in his company rather than money in the bank.
c. To reduce his exposure to risk Walter should purchase more stock in his company if he
believes more people will buy computers in the future.
d. To minimize risk Walter should sell the stock in his company and buy other assets to diversify
his financial holdings.
Answer: D
67. Consider Figure 5-6. The family shown faces the budget line A1BFZ. Health insurance is
measured in $100 units and other goods in $1 units. A health insurance plan is introduced which
would provide this family $15,000 worth of insurance for $4,000. The new budget constraint the
family will face is:
Other Goods Figure 5-6
$61,000 = A
$50,000 = A1
B A’
$46,000 = A2
$35,000 = A3 F
0 H1 H2 Z Z’ Health Insurance
(40) (150)
a. AA’Z’
b. AA1BA’Z’
c. A1BA’Z’
d. A1A2BA’Z’
Answer: C
68. Show and explain why substituting an unrestricted cash transfer for an excise subsidy of equal
cost to the government must lead to less consumption of the subsidized good and more
consumption of other goods.
Answer: Let the initial budget line be AZ. An excise subsidy for food will decrease the slope of
the budget line because it lowers the price of food.
Let the new budget line be AY. The optimal (utility-maximizing) consumption bundle under the
excise subsidy is (FC, Oc.. The subsidy costs the government the dollar value of distance CJ because
this is the distance between the subsidized (AY) and unsubsidized (AZ) budget lines at the optimal
level of food consumption (the subsidized good). In other words, if the consumer had to pay the
original (unsubsidized) price, he or she would have distance JFC left to spend on other goods after
buying FC units of food. But with the subsidy, the consumer has distance CFC left to spend on other
goods after buying FC units of food (at the lower subsidized price). The difference, distance CJ, is
the part the government pays for the consumer.
The budget line for an equal-cost lump sum transfer must therefore pass through point C since
point C is distance CJ above budget line AZ. Budget line GH is always distance CJ above line
AZ; they are parallel. The lump sum grant of distance GA (equal to distance CJ) must lead to less
consumption of the food and more consumption of other goods because the lump sum budget line
(GH) is not tangent to, but intersects indifference curve U2. This can be seen above by noting that
point OF is above point OC on the Y-axis and point FF is to the left of point FC on the X-axis. In
other words, both the excise and lump sum subsidies have income effects which tend to increase
consumption of food, only the excise subsidy has a substitution which tends to increase further the
consumption of food which is made relatively less expensive by the excise subsidy.
69. The government of Lilliput wants to ensure food security for all its citizens. Explain how each
of these policies will affect the consumption of food and other goods using indifference curves.
d) Providing $50 worth of food per head free of cost at government-run food agencies. (Assume
that an individual cannot supplement this quantity with any extra food)
Answer:
a)
For a consumer who was initially at point A with a negatively sloped budget line, a voucher for
$50 changes the budget line such that it has a slope of zero up to the quantity that can be purchased
for $50. For quantities greater than $50, the budget line is negatively sloped, as shown in bold in
the figure. The consumer who was earlier at point A, can now choose to consume only food (at
point A’’) or more of food and other goods at A’. He moves up to a higher indifference curve.
b)
With cash transfer the budget line shifts from MN to M’N’. Due to the income effect of the cash
transfer, consumers are able to increase their purchases of both goods and can consume more of
food or other goods or both according to their preferences. However, the consumer will definitely
move to a higher indifference curve.
c)
A per unit excise subsidy on food decreases the price of food and the budget line rotates about the
vertical axis. Due to the income and substitution effects of an excise subsidy the consumption of
the subsidized good increases.
d)
The budget line for a fixed-quantity subsidy is shown in bold in the figure. Up to $50 worth of
food can be consumed at no extra cost to the consumer. If the consumer wishes to consume more
than $50 worth of food, he will have to forego the subsidized quantity entirely and consume only
along the RZ portion of the budget line, paying the full cost of the food. The fixed-quantity subsidy
does not benefit a consumer who does not wish to avail of the food supplied by the government.
a) Sarah drives 6 miles to work every day. Liam takes the same route but has to drive for a total of
11 miles. With the objective of reducing traffic jams, the government decides to impose a tax on
drivers. How would an annual fixed payment of $500 as congestion charges affect Sarah and Liam?
Explain your answer using indifference curves and a common budget line for Liam and Sarah.
Answer:
a) Irrespective of the number of miles they drive per day, both Sarah and Liam have to pay the
same $500 as congestion charges. This implies that their per-mile price of a mile is zero; once they
pay $500, they can drive as many miles as they wish at zero cost. Their common budget line is
vertical with a slope of 0. They would continue to drive the same number of miles as they have no
gains from reducing or increasing the number of miles they drive per day.
b) As a result of the per-unit fee, the slope of the budget line changes from zero to a negative slope
reflecting the increase in per-unit cost to $1. Both Sarah and Liam reduce the number of miles they
drive, perhaps by carpooling or using public transport. Sarah moves to a higher indifference curve
whereas Liam moves to a lower indifference curve. Since Sarah drives less than the average
number of miles (8.5 miles) she is better off on a per-unit fee system.
Difficulty Level: Medium
Section Reference: Paying for Garbage
Learning Objective: Explore the impact of per-bag charges versus a fixed annual fee on the amount
of trash generated by a community, recycling, and household welfare.
71. Fun-day, a theme park, recently changed its ticket pricing plan from Plan 1 to Plan 2. How
would you explain the sudden increase in the number of people at the theme park?
Plan 1 Plan 2
Children Adults Children Adults
Fixed
0 0 $20 $40
admission fee
Per-ride fee $2 $5 0 0
Answer: Assume that there are two adults with budget constraints of $40 each. Plan 1 offers
different prices for different rides. The budget line facing both adults is the same straight line with
a slope of –5. The number of rides that the adult chooses will depend on his or her preferences but
will be limited by the budget constraint.
Plan 2 offers a flat admission free and an unlimited number of rides; after paying the fee visitors
can enjoy an unlimited number of rides. This implies that their budget constraint is vertical with a
zero slope. The price per ride becomes zero so visitors tend to enjoy more rides than they would
on a per-unit pricing plan, assuming that the number of rides is a normal good and that the number
of rides each adult enjoys is not affected by congestion and queues.
The case for children can be explained analogously.
a) Doug is 51 years old. He owns a Laundromat and plans to retire at the age of 60. Pete is 21 years
old. He just started working at an investment bank. The figure shows the preferences for future
and present consumption for an individual. Other things unchanged, who is more likely to be at
point N on the budget line and why?
b) The government passes a new regulation on bank bonuses; the tax rate on bonuses has been
hiked to 55%. How would this affect Pete, whose annual bonus forms a substantial portion of his
compensation?
a) The endowment point N on the budget line is indicative of a low level of present income and a
higher level of future income. This is a pattern observed in younger workers and students and so
is most likely to be Pete’s consumption pattern.
b) A hike in the tax rate on bonuses would reduce the income available for Pete to spend in the
future. The reduction in future income will lead to an inward parallel shift of Pete’s budget line,
reducing his consumption both in the present and the future.
73. In the model of inter-temporal choice, will a person who initially consumes exactly their
income in each period have more or less current consumption after a decrease in the interest rate?
Answer: The graph below represents a consumer, facing interest rate ‘r’, who consumes exactly
her income in both the periods.
Since the person initially consumes exactly their income in each period, the original utility-
maximizing indifference curve, U1, must be tangent to the original budget line, AB, at the
endowment point, N. A decrease in the interest rate causes the budget line to rotate about point N.
The new budget line is CE and this person will necessarily have more current consumption and
less future consumption.
74. Phil and Jane, and their son Dylan, have $10,000 in savings which they would like to invest.
Phil wants to use the money to open a diner although he has only a 30% chance of getting the same
returns as Jane who prefers investing the money in Treasury bills. Jane prefers to invest in T-bills
since they are less risky. Their son, Dylan, is indifferent between the diner and Treasury bills as
long as he gets a new car. How would you represent their preferences towards risk and return on
an indifference map?
Answer: Phil prefers an uncertain outcome to a certain prospect that gives the same outcome; Phil
is risk-loving. Jane prefers a certain outcome to an uncertain outcome that gives the same returns;
Jane is risk-averse. Dylan does care one way or the other about the risk or returns from a diner or
T-bills; he is risk-neutral.
The indifference curves are positively sloped because risk is considered an economic “bad”.
Jane’s indifference curves are steeper than Phil’s. This is because for a given increase in risk, Jane
needs to be compensated with a greater return to remain at the same level of utility.
Phil has flatter indifference curves because he needs a smaller return for an increase in risk.
Dylan is risk-neutral; he is indifferent to the amount of risk as long as he gets a higher return.
75. Describe the relationship among total utility, marginal utility, and preferences toward risk.
Answer: Marginal utility is the slope (or derivative) of the total utility curve. With respect to
investors, marginal utility is the change in total utility for a one unit change in return. A risk-averse
investor’s total utility curve has a positive and diminishing slope. Therefore, a risk-averse
investor’s marginal utility curve has a negative slope. Similarly, a risk-neutral investor has a total
utility curve with a positive but constant slope. Therefore, a risk-neutral investor’s marginal utility
curve has a zero slope, i.e., it is flat. Finally, a risk-loving investor’s total utility curve has a positive
and increasing slope indicating that the marginal utility curve has a positive slope.
b) Explain why holding a diverse portfolio of assets is important to minimizing the risk of an
investment portfolio.
c) Given the importance of diversifying all of your financial assets, is it a good idea to own stock
in the company for which you work, even if you own stock in other sectors? Explain why or why
not.
d) A home is the most valuable asset for a majority of U.S. residents. Why do we not see more
diversification in real estate ownership against loss of value due to market fluctuations?
Answer:
a) Insurance companies assume risks of different individuals and diversify that risk across
individuals and across geographic regions.
Suppose there is a risk-averse individual who has a one in one-hundred chance of his house
catching fire each year and causing $100,000 in damage. What this means is that once every
hundred years this individual can expect his house to catch fire and consequently have to pay
$100,000 in repair costs. His expected loss is $1,000 per year, which he could simply put aside
and after 99 years his house catches fire and he uses the money he’s put aside, plus an additional
$1,000 for the 100th year, and repairs his home.
Unfortunately, he doesn’t know in which of the 100 years his home will catch fire, or if it will
catch fire at all, or even more than once. If it happens during his first year of saving up to pay the
cost of a fire, he has to greatly curtail his consumption of other goods to pay for the damages. In
this case, this individual, because he is risk-averse, would have been willing to pay more than
$1,000 each year to have someone else assume the cost of damage should his house catch fire.
The solution is to purchase insurance against the damage. What this means is that an insurance
firm accepts $1,000 from each of 100 homeowners, each with the same expected loss as the
individual above. When one of the one hundred homes catches fire, the insurance company uses
the $100,000 it has collected to repair the damage to the unlucky homeowner. Given that our
homeowner, because he is risk-averse, is willing to pay more than the expected loss of $1,000 to
insure against damages, the insurance company charges a fee of $1,000 per homeowner, plus an
additional amount to cover its operating expenses, and it assumes the risk for the 100 homeowners.
Because the insurance company insures people in different geographic regions, and to cover a
variety of calamities, it is diversifying its expected loss. A case in point is an insurance company
that insures against hurricane damages along the coast of Florida, but does not sell other insurance
to individuals in, say, sunny California. By failing to diversify its holdings of insurance policies,
the company benefits greatly if hurricanes never happen, but is financially devastated should one
come through and wreak heavy damages to homes the company has insured.
b) If stock and bond prices follow a random walk, which is the prevailing wisdom, then their prices
are consequently unpredictable. The goal is to have a holding of financial assets that in the
aggregate do not vary significantly from their long-run growth. So it is better to own stock in both
the picnic basket company as well as the umbrella company because it if there is an unexpectedly
long duration of rain, your holdings in the picnic basket company fall, but those in the umbrella
company rise. Conversely, if there is an unexpected drought, then the opposite is true. In the long
run, your holdings average, say, 7%, and by holding a portfolio of diverse assets, the value of your
portfolio at any point in time does not vary by much more than that.
c) Given your human capital is your most important asset, you should not invest your money where
you have invested your human capital. If your company goes bankrupt, you not only lost your job,
you’ve also lost your savings. If you work for suppose the picnic basket company, you must own
stocks in the umbrella company. If your portfolio is already well diversified, then the risk of
holding stock in the company for which your work is likely to be reduced.
d) One explanation is that if you were to diversify your home’s ownership with, say, twenty other
homeowners by each owning 1/20th of 20 different homes in different regions, then there is less of
an incentive to care for the property. If I could benefit $100 by allowing $1,000 damage to go
unabated to the home in which I am living, but of which I only own twenty percent, then my cost
of allowing $1,000 worth of damage to occur is only $50. Since the $100 benefit from neglect is
greater than the $50 cost, we can expect to see more neglect.
There is also a problem with transferring ownership of shared homes, which has been experienced
with timeshares. Timeshares are a program where a company manages the tenancy of (mostly)
condominiums jointly owned by many people.