Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Selen Aslan
Selen Aslan
Aslan – 25102411714
2
Why is Türkiye not developing?
Education System and Human Resources:
The education system is one of the main factors that determine the
innovation and productivity level of a country. Turkey's education system has
some weaknesses in raising qualified human resources and encouraging
innovative thinking. Factors such as inequalities in education quality and
access, inadequate STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics)
education and the lack of research-oriented universities can negatively affect
innovation and productivity growth.
R&D and Innovation Investments:
Turkey's insufficient investment in R&D and innovation is an important
factor limiting its innovation capacity. Private sector's R&D expenditures
remain low and the government's R&D policies and incentives are not
implemented effectively. More resources and incentives are needed to
strengthen the innovation ecosystem, improve R&D infrastructure and
increase cooperation opportunities.
Bureaucracy and Regulatory Environment:
The complex bureaucratic structure in Turkey can increase the costs of doing
business and hinder innovation processes. The lack of rapid decision-making
mechanisms can make it difficult for business to respond quickly to
innovative projects. In addition, the uncertainty and instability of the
regulatory environment can adversely affect investment decisions and limit
entrepreneurship.
Labor Efficiency:
Turkey's labor productivity level is low when compared to other developed
countries. A low-skilled workforce can limit the ability to adapt to technology
and create a barrier to the adoption of innovative production processes.
Improvement of workforce skills and investment in training programs that
encourage innovative thinking are needed.
3
Turkey cannot produce and does not develop due to the negative effects of
politics on the economy.
Politics plays a crucial role in shaping the economic landscape of any country,
and Turkey is no exception. Over the years, Turkey has experienced various
political factors that have influenced its economy, affecting its ability to
produce and develop.
Uncertain Policy Environment:
Political instability and an uncertain policy environment can have
detrimental effects on the economy. Fluctuations in political ideologies, and
inconsistent policies can create an atmosphere of uncertainty that hinders
investment and economic planning. Investors may be reluctant to commit
resources to long-term projects due to the unpredictable nature of the
political climate, impeding Turkey's production growth.
Bureaucracy and Regulatory Challenges:
Cumbersome bureaucratic procedures and complex regulations can be
significant obstacles to economic development. Excessive red tape, lengthy
approval processes, and an intricate legal framework can hinder the ease of
doing business in Turkey. High regulatory burdens increase costs for
businesses, discourage entrepreneurship, and create barriers for small and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to enter and thrive in the market. This
stifles innovation, limits competition, and restricts the expansion of
production capacities.
Political Influence on Monetary and Fiscal Policies:
Political pressures can exert influence over monetary and fiscal policies,
compromising their effectiveness in managing the economy. When political
considerations override sound economic principles, it can lead to
unsustainable fiscal deficits, excessive government spending, or
inappropriate monetary policies. These actions can result in inflation,
currency devaluation, and increased borrowing costs, which negatively
impact businesses' ability to invest, expand production, and remain
competitive.
Geopolitical Challenges:
Turkey's geopolitical position can expose its economy to external shocks and
challenges. Regional conflicts, trade disputes, or economic sanctions imposed
by other countries can disrupt supply chains, limit market access, and impact
foreign investments. These geopolitical factors can create an unstable
environment that affects Turkey's production capabilities and deters foreign
investors.
4
Impact on Investor Confidence:
Political factors heavily influence investor confidence, which is vital for
attracting both domestic and foreign investments. Political polarization, lack
of transparency, and concerns about the rule of law can erode trust in
Turkey's economic prospects. Investors seek stability, predictability, and a
favorable business environment to allocate their resources. When political
factors cast doubt on these conditions, it becomes challenging to attract the
investments needed to spur production and foster economic growth.
Human Capital Development:
Political stability and government policies play a critical role in developing
human capital. Education and vocational training programs, as well as
initiatives to foster research and development, are essential for increasing
productivity and promoting innovation in production processes. However,
political instability and inconsistent policies can disrupt these initiatives,
leading to skill gaps in the labor force and hindering the development of a
competitive workforce.
The negative effects of politics on Turkey's economy are undeniable. Political
instability, uncertain policy environments, bureaucratic hurdles, and
geopolitical challenges have hampered the country's production capacity and
hindered its development. To overcome these obstacles, Turkey needs to
prioritize political stability, enhance transparency, streamline regulations,
and foster a favorable business environment. By doing so, the country can
create an atmosphere that encourages investments, supports innovation, and
promotes sustainable economic growth, leading to increased production and
development.
5
As an example: Comparison of Türkiye's education data with OECD countries
Turkey has improved significantly over the past ten years in terms of the
percentage of adults 25 to 34 who have graduated from a higher education, but it
still lags behind other nations. Additionally, although there is a 15% difference in
the percentage of graduates from higher education compared to other nations,
the gap in the percentage of graduates from secondary education is over 20%,
which shows that only a small percentage of people continue their education
after completing their primary education.
While this number does not reach 35% in the USA, EU, and OECD countries, it is
particularly high in Turkey, where it is over 55% of young people who do not continue
their education.
In Turkey, just 50% of primary school graduates participate actively in their lives. When
one's academic level rises, so does employment. Graduates of secondary education have
an employment rate of 60%, while graduates of higher education have an employment
6
rate of 75%. Turkish citizens have a low average level of education, which has led to a
57% overall employment rate.
is downhill.
Turkey's youthful population's graphs showing educational attainment It is clear that
70% of people between the ages of 15 and 19 are in school. Levels are visible. In the USA,
the EU, and the OECD countries, this rate hovers around 85% on average. However, when
the age group of 20 to 24 is included, the rate of education reduces to 40% in the USA, EU,
and OECD countries, compared to 60% for males and 50% for women in Turkey. In
comparison to the USA, EU, and OECD countries, Turkey's schooling rate is lower in the
15–19 age range, but higher in the 20–29 age range.
The graph below illustrates how women in Turkey attend school at a similar rate to
males. However, it is clear that there are not a lot of women enrolling in the 20–24
age group. In Turkey, women between the ages of 25 and 29 have a school
attendance rate of roughly 30%.
7
When data from 2010 to 2020 in Turkey are evaluated, a general rise in the
educational attainment of young people between the ages of 25 and 34 is
seen. While the proportion of people who completed primary school, which
was 58%, fell to 41%, the proportion of people who completed higher
education rose to 35%. In Turkey, 38% of young people between the ages of
18 and 24 are still in school. While this number rises to 65% among students
who continue their study, it is only about 50% for young people who stop
their studies. OECD nations trail the European Union and the United States in
terms of youth employment in Turkey in percentage terms.
Turkey has a lower schooling rate than the OECD, the EU, and the US, with a
rate of about 70% for students between the ages of 15 and 19. The 20-29 age
bracket has a high enrolment rate, though. As a result, Turkey has a greater
rate of young people continuing their studies. Turkey has an extremely low
incidence of school enrollment among children under the age of 3. This rate
can be 40% for children ages 3-5, but it lags well below other nations in the
other category. In Turkey, 27% of students over the age of 25 are enrolled in
the age groups that begin higher education initially.
It is clear that Turkey's average age of entrance into higher education is
greater as a result of the higher rate of continuing education. For each
educational level, Turkey spends less on education than the EU and OECD
countries do. With the USA, this discrepancy is four times greater,
particularly at the higher education level.
Secondary education groups show the extent of Turkey's educational
spending. This viewpoint leads to the conclusion that secondary education is
the field of study with the greatest number of students in Turkey. Although
the ratio of spending to GDP is roughly the same across all nations, the
portion devoted to higher education costs stands out. Turkey offers more
social science courses than other EU nations do at the elementary level,
measured in percentages of total course hours.