Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rand Paul On Gun Control
Rand Paul On Gun Control
htm
As President, I vow to uphold our entire Bill of Rights, but specifically our right to bear arms. I will not
support any proposed gun control law which would limit the right to gun ownership by those who are
responsible, law-abiding citizens. In the White House, I will remain vigilant in the fight against infringements
on our Second Amendment rights.
Source: 2016 presidential campaig n website, RandPaul.com, "Issues" , Apr 7, 2015
We are the party that adheres to the Constitution. We will not let the liberals tread on the Second Amendment!
We will fight to defend the entire Bill of Rights. We will stand up against excessive government power
wherever we see it. We cannot and will not allow any President to act as if he were a king. We will not let any
President use executive orders to impinge on the Second Amendment.
Source: Tea Party Response to 2013 State of the Union Address , Feb 12, 2013
[Speech at the Knob Creek Machine Gun Shootout, April 4, 2009]: Unless you want a government that can
enter your house at will, check to see if you have trigger locks, measure the length of your guns and rapidity of
their ability to fire, you must oppose violations of the Fourth Amendment like the PATRIOT Act.
Source: The Tea Party Goes to Washing ton, by Rand Paul, p.125 , Feb 22, 2011
How many supposed pro-gun politicians voted for the Patriot Act which gives the government the right to
search your home without a warrant, when you're not home, leave listening devices, and use any and all
information to create a prosecution on any charge regardless of their original reason for the search?
G un rights advoc ates need to know that the 2 nd amendment is only as good as the fourth amendment. I f
we are not free from unreas onable and warrantles s s earc hes , no one's guns are s afe.
Source: 2010 Senate campaig n website, www.randpaul2010.com, "issues" , Sep 1, 2010
How many politicians claim they are supporters of the 2nd amendment and then vote to restrict handguns? We
need to send people to Washington that not only understand the 2nd amendment but the entire Bill of Rights.
Source: 2010 Senate campaig n website, www.randpaul2010.com, "Issues" , Jul 19, 2010
1 of 4 02/04/2020, 13:07
Rand Paul on Gun Control http://www.issues2000.org/2016/Rand_Paul_Gun_Control.htm
Congressional Summary:
T he term 'large c apac ity ammunition feeding devic e' means a magazine or s imilar devic e that has an
overall c apac ity of more than 1 0 rounds of ammunition
I t s hall be unlawful for a pers on to import, s ell, manufac ture, or pos s es s a large c apac ity ammunition
feeding devic e.
Shall not apply to the pos s es s ion of any large c apac ity ammunition feeding devic e otherwis e lawfully
pos s es s ed before 2 0 1 3 .
Shall not apply to qualified or retired law enforc ement offic ers .
P roponent's Argument f or v oti ng Yes: Sen. BL U M E N T H A L : T his amendment would ban high- c apac ity
magazines whic h are us ed to kill more people more quic kly and, in fac t, have been us ed in more than half
the mas s s hootings s inc e 1 9 8 2 . I as k my c olleagues to lis ten to law enforc ement, their polic e,
pros ec utors who are outgunned by c riminals who us e thes e high- c apac ity magazines . I as k that my
c olleagues als o lis ten to the families of thos e killed by people who us ed a high- c apac ity magazine.
Opponent's Argument f or v oti ng No: Sen. G RA SSL E Y. I oppos e the amendment. I n 2 0 0 4 , whic h is the
las t time we had the large- c apac ity magazine ban, a D epartment of J us tic e s tudy found no evidenc e
banning s uc h magazines has led to a reduc tion in gun violenc e. T he s tudy als o c onc luded it is not c lear
how often the outc omes of the gun attac k depend on the ability of offenders to fire more than 1 0 s hots
without reloading. Sec ondly, there is no evidenc e banning thes e magazines has reduc ed the deaths from
gun c rimes . I n fac t, when the previous ban was in effec t, a higher perc entage of gun c rime vic tims were
killed or wounded than before it was adopted. A dditionally, tens of millions of thes e magazines have been
lawfully owned in this c ountry for dec ades . T hey are in c ommon us e, not unus ually dangerous , and us ed by
law- abiding c itizens in s elf- defens e, as in the c as e of law enforc ement.
Reference: Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act; Bill S.Amdt. 714 to S. 649 ; vote number 13-SV103 on Apr 17, 2013
2 of 4 02/04/2020, 13:07
Rand Paul on Gun Control http://www.issues2000.org/2016/Rand_Paul_Gun_Control.htm
F: True enemy of gun owners ' rights . A c ons is tent anti- gun c andidate.
? : Refus ed to ans wer the N RA - P V F C andidate Q ues tionnaire, often an indic ation of indifferenc e, if
not outright hos tility, to gun owners ' rights .
1 . T he treaty violates a 2 0 0 9 red line laid down by your own adminis tration: "the rule of c ons ens us
dec is ion- making." I n A pril 2 0 1 3 , after the treaty failed to ac hieve c ons ens us , it was adopted by
majority vote in the U N G eneral A s s embly.
2 . T he treaty allows amendments by a 3 /4 majority vote. When amended, it will bec ome a s ourc e of
politic al and legal pres s ure on the U S to c omply in prac tic e with amendments it was unwilling to
ac c ept.
3 . T he treaty inc ludes only a weak, non- binding referenc e to the lawful owners hip and us e of firearms ,
and rec ognizes none of thes e ac tivities , muc h les s individual s elf- defens e, as fundamental individual
rights . I t enc ourages governments to c ollec t the identities of individual end us ers of imported
firearms at the national level, whic h would c ons titute the c ore of a national gun regis try
4 . T he State D epartment has ac knowledged that the treaty is "ambiguous ." By bec oming party to the
treaty, the U S would therefore be ac c epting c ommitments that are inherently unc lear.
5 . T he c riteria at the heart of the treaty are vague and eas ily politic ized. T hey will s teadily s ubjec t the
U S to the influenc e of internationally- defined norms , a proc es s that would impinge on our national
s overeignty.
6 . T he treaty c riteria as es tablis hed c ould hinder the U S in fulfilling its s trategic , legal, and moral
c ommitments to provide arms to key allies s uc h as Taiwan and I s rael.
We urge you to notify the treaty depository that the US does not intend to ratify the Arms Trade Treaty, and is
therefore not bound by its obligations. As members of the Senate, we pledge to oppose the ratification of this
treaty, and we give notice that we do not regard the US as bound to uphold its object and purpose.
Source: Letter to Obama from 50 Senators 13-UNATT on Sep 25, 2013
Click here f or def init ions & background inf ormation on Gun Control.
Click here f or policy papers on Gun Control.
Click here f or a prof ile of Rand Paul.
Click here f or Rand Paul on all the issues.
Click here f or Vot eMat ch responses by Rand Paul.
3 of 4 02/04/2020, 13:07
Rand Paul on Gun Control http://www.issues2000.org/2016/Rand_Paul_Gun_Control.htm
Search for...
Search
4 of 4 02/04/2020, 13:07