Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management Canadian 11th Edition Robbins Solutions Manual Download
Management Canadian 11th Edition Robbins Solutions Manual Download
Management Canadian 11th Edition Robbins Solutions Manual Download
Chapter 6
Innovation and Adaptability
Change is a constant for organizations and thus for managers. Because change can’t be
eliminated, managers must learn how to manage it successfully. Innovation is often
closely tied to an organization’s change efforts; thus, managers must know how to
manage it as well. Focus on the following learning outcomes as you read and study this
chapter.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
CHAPTER VIGNETTE
6-68
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
Research In Motion (RIM) is used as the chapter vignette to illustrate the need to deal
with massive disruption that is typical of the marketplace today, in particular in the
technological industry. It further illustrates that the company had to plan for a future that
was largely unknown and in many ways unpredictable. It amplifies other chapter
concepts such as the importance of having the design and structure of the organization
support its ability to be adaptable. At the same time, recruiting and retaining employees
who would thrive in such an environment was core to Blackberry’s success. It was vital
to build a corporate culture that embraced change and cherished innovation and
adaptability as core organizational values.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. INTRODUCTION
Big companies and small businesses, universities and colleges, and
governments at all levels are being forced to significantly change the way
they do things. Although change has always been a part of the manager’s
job, it has become even more important in recent years. In this chapter, we
describe why change is important and how managers can manage change.
Since change is often closely tied to an organization’s innovation efforts,
we also discuss ways in which managers can stimulate innovation and
increase their organization’s adaptability. Then, we conclude by looking at
some current issues in managing change.
6-69
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
6-70
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
6-71
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
6-72
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
6-73
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
A dramatic crisis occurs. This can be the shock that weakens the
status quo and makes people start thinking about the relevance of the
current culture. Examples are a surprising financial setback, the loss
of a major customer, or a dramatic technological innovation by a
competitor.
● Leadership changes hands. New top leadership, who can provide an
alternative set of key values, may be perceived as more capable of
responding to the crisis than the old leaders were. Top leadership
includes the organization’s chief executive but might include all senior
managers.
● The organization is young and small. The younger the organization, the
less entrenched its culture. Similarly, it’s easier for managers to
communicate new values in a small organization than in a large one.
6-74
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
● The culture is weak. The more widely held the values and the higher
the agreement among members on those values, the more difficult it will
be to change. Conversely, weak cultures are more receptive to change
than are strong ones.
H. Making Change Happen Successfully
Managers can increase the likelihood that change will be successful in
their organization by:
1. Focusing on preparing the organization for change.
(See Exhibit 6-7 for mistakes managers can make when leading
change and Exhibit 6-8 for characteristics of an adaptable
organization.)
2. Recognizing the important role they themselves play in the
change process.
3. Involving every organizational member in the change.
4. Explain Lewin’s three-step model of the change process. How is it different from
the change process needed in the white-water rapids metaphor of change?
In Lewin’s model, successful change usually occurs in three steps: unfreezing,
change and refreezing. For unfreezing to occur, the organization must plan a
move away from the status quo. To move away from this equilibrium, the
organization undergoes an increase of the driving forces, which are forces
pushing for change and/or a decrease in the restraining forces, which are forces
that resist change. After unfreezing, the change itself can be implemented. To
6-75
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
make the change permanent, the new situation needs to be refrozen. On the
other hand, the change process needed in the white-water rapids metaphor of
change requires than change that takes place in uncertain and dynamic
environments such that there is no real status quo per se, and thus the
opportunity to plan to move away from it does not exist.
Think of something that you would like to change in your personal life. It could be your
study habits, your fitness and nutrition, the way you interact with others, or anything else
that is of interest to you. What values and assumptions have encouraged the behaviour
that currently exists (that is, the one you want to change)? What driving and restraining
forces can you address in order to make the desired change?
Teaching Suggestions:
In this particular exercise, students’ responses will obviously be very personal and
unique to them. Given that this is the case, you may want to suggest that they pair up
6-76
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
with someone in the class that they know and feel comfortable with to discuss it with
them, rather than asking them to report back to the class. Then, engage the class in a
full group discussion, focusing on the values and assumptions that have encouraged the
behaviour that currently exists, and what driving and restraining forces had to be
addressed in order to make the desired change.
WORKING TOGETHER —
TEAM-BASED EXERCISE TEACHING
SUGGESTIONS
Students were asked to form small groups of three to four individuals and undertake the
following: Your team’s “job” is to find some current information on learning organizations.
You’ll probably be able to find numerous articles about the topic, but limit your report to
five of what you consider to be the best sources of information on the topic. Using this
information, write a one-page bulleted list discussing your reactions to the statement set
in bold at the beginning of this exercise. Be sure to include bibliographic information for
your five chosen articles at the end of your one-page bulleted list.
Teaching Suggestions:
The premise behind the exercise is that a company’s future depends on how well it is
able to learn. After hearing about what the students’ research revealed about learning
organizations, you may want to ask the class what characteristics learning organizations
have in common, and ask them whether they agree with the premise of the exercise or
not, and why.
1. What do you think of UA's approach to innovation? Would you expect to see this type
of innovation in an athletic wear company? Explain.
UA should be admired for not standing pat in spite of its massive success. It seems
unusual that an athletic wear company would emphasize innovation to this degree
given the relatively simple nature of their products.
6-77
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Management, 11ce Instructor’s Manual
demographic statistics. But it also entails being able to convert those customer
insights into real and usable products.
4. What’s your interpretation of the company's philosophy posted prominently over the
door of its design studio? What does it say about innovation?
A telling sign of the company's philosophy is found over the door of its product design
studios: "We have not yet built our defining product." It serves the company well by
strongly indicating that it needs to continue to innovate in spite of its success, and
that it should never become complacent.
The Anti-Hierarchy
3. Why do you think a company like Apple is able to be creative with a strongly
hierarchical structure, while other companies find hierarchy limiting?
The hierarchical structure can work if the organization is placing reliance on a
“creative genius” at the top of the organization. Conversely, those companies who
take a more decentralized approach to innovation may find hierarchy limiting since a
good idea may be rejected and thus abandoned when it has some real merit.
4. Do you think Apple's success was entirely dependent on Steve Jobs in his role as
head of the hierarchy? What are the potential drawbacks when a company is so
strongly connected to the decision making of a single individual?
It does appear that Apple's success was entirely dependent on Steve Jobs in his
role as head of the hierarchy. The drawbacks are that the organization becomes too
dependent on him or her and will suffer if he or she can no longer fulfill this role. In
addition, others in the organization who have good ideas may feel frustrated that
they do not have the opportunity to pursue them with this approach to innovation.
6-78
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.