Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Summer
Final Summer
1. Introduction
The Global insurance market is categorized into two life insurance & general insurance.
According to McKinsey, North America & Developing Asia-Pacific contributed about 70
percent of the total premium within this decade with North America leading in the market.
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Advanced Emerging Asia-Pacific India
Markets Markets
35.2%
30.4%
18.4%
12.1%
10.2%
The Key Growth Drivers for the Indian insurance industry are
1. Demographics:
As India accounts for 68 percent of the young population this creates a key growth
factor for insurance factor in India.
2. Digital Behaviour:
Consumers are tending toward digital modes for their insurance needs as India is 2nd
largest internet user market and it also creates agents’ ease with digital tools.
3. Government Programs:
Due to various government initiatives such as PM-JAY a scheme under Ayushman
Bharat, there has been an increase in insurance penetration in India
Motor insurance in India is Mandatory in India as per the Motor Vehicles Act, of 1998. The
Indian motor insurance is segmented based on,
The covid impacted Indian motor insurance negatively for a long period as there were halts in
business due to which new automobile purchases which contribute major to premiums were at
the stoppage. As Motor insurance in India accounted for 34,1 percent after the post covid rise
in automobile sales created a demand for motor insurance.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company is a tie-up between Bajaj Finserv and Allianz SE a
German insurance company. The company officially registered on 2nd May 2001 from IRDA
and is one of the biggest insurance companies in India.
Bajaj Allianz has penetration in over 11000 towns and cities with a wide network of
more than 80000 agents and 9000 motor dealer affiliations. The company recently came up
with a brand identity known as ‘Caringly Yours’. Bajaj Allianz focuses on customer centricity
& excellent and caring experience for the customer.
The management is led by Mr. Tapan Singhel MD & CEO, Mr. TA Ramalingam CTO
& Mr. Sasikumar Adidamu Chief Distribution Officer
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Insurance
In context to individual perspective, insurance is an economic tool through which an individual
allocates a small certain cost known as a premium for a large uncertainty or financial loss. The
main function of insurance is to create the counterpart of risk which could be described as
security further the insurance does not lessen the chance of uncertainty for the policyholder but
it guarantees that it will reduce the probability of financial loss. (Vaughan, 2003)
Expectedi
Service
Gap5
Perceived
Servicei
Service quality
Specificationsi
Gap2
Management perceptions of
iCustomer Expectationsi
Figure 4: Service Quality Gap Model
These five gaps are depicted in respectively in Figure 4. (Siami, Gorji, 2012).: Gap1: the
expectation of customers and perception of management towards those expectations. Gap 2:
the gap between management perception of the expectation of customer service quality and
specifications. Gap 3: the Gap between quality specifications and service delivery. Gap 4: the
gap between the delivery of service and the external communication to customers service
delivery. Gap 5: the gap between customer expectations and perceived services. It is considered
as the functional gap in the model. Parasuraman et al (1985) stated 11 determining dimensions
of the service quality model and determined the expected customer service and cognition
service. Further with the help of the ten-service dimension he developed 97 questionnaires and
adopted the SERVQUAL model from the difference between expectations of the customers
and perceived which is Service Quality = P (Perception)- E (Expectation).
1. Tangibles:
The visualization of Physical facilities, communications, equipment, and personnel
(Siami, Gorji, 2012). As there is no physical element to be examined, customers often
believe the tangible evidence that surrounds them. (Lovelock, & Wirtz, 2007). It
includes subjects (for example appearance of the employees) and physical surrounding
objects (for example, design and decoration). (Onyeaghala & Obioma, 2016). Stafford
et al (1988) stated following opinion toward tangible dimension in respect to insurance
Office’s Visual appeal
Employees neatness, appearance & appeal
Office Modernness
2. Assurance:
The information and courtesy of employees and their skills and ability to convey trust
and confidence (Siami, Gorji, 2012). Onyeaghala & Obioma (2016) states that
assurance is wide features that provide customer confidence such as service guarantee,
promise, trustworthy behaviour and politeness from the employees. Stafford et al
(1988) stated following opinion toward Assurance dimension in respect to insurance
Insurer trustworthiness
How safe policyholders feel in engaging with the insurance companies
Employees politeness
If the required resources are available to carry out the claim process
3. Responsiveness:
It is a tool for measuring the organization and employees’ receptiveness towards
customers and their willingness to assist customers. Customers often believe in
responsiveness by considering of the time taken to deliver the service (Sheaba,
SekataKenea,2017). Responsiveness is providing service quickly and readiness to serve
unexpected urgent requests (Van Duong Ha, 2020). Stafford et al (1988) stated the
following opinion toward the responsiveness dimension with respect to insurance
Informing customers when service will be delivered (claims, checks)
Quickness of service
4. Empathy:
Onyeaghala & Obioma, (2016) states that empathy is the service firm’s ability to
understand, be genuinely concerned, compassionate, and ready to attend to every
customer with individual needs. Every type of service can have vital factors that are
considered than others, which will be influenced by the environmental features or type
of activity (Lovelock & Writz, 2007). Stafford et al (1988) stated the following opinion
regarding the empathy dimension
The personal and individual attention insurance companies provided to the
customers
Employee’s ability to determine customer needs.
Flexible operating hours to individual schedules
5. Reliability
Reliability is the competence to initiate the pledged service accurately and dependably,
reliability focuses on the outcome of service output was as promised. (Siami, Gorji,
2012). Stafford et al (1988) stated following opinion toward Reliability dimension in
respect to insurance companies
The ability to deliver the promises in time (claim process and issues)
The sympathy toward customer problems offered by insurance companies’
employees (Claims/auto accidents)
Accuracy of maintaining records
Timeliness in processing and claim checks.
5. Processing
It is a formal request to the company regarding the payment based on the terms of the
policy, the company reviews the validity and then decides to pay out or deny the request
to compensate (GIC).
Kothari (2019) states research designs the conceptual structure in which the research is carried
out it include the blueprint for the data collection, measurement and analysis of the data
collected. further he states research methodology is the way to systematic way to solve the
research problem. A Descriptive study design is carried out to analyse and interpret the study
on the motor car insurance service quality factors. Thyer (2001) states that the descriptive study
is a type of a study where the data is collected without changing the environment. Kothari
(2019) states descriptive research is mainly concerned with describing the individual or groups
characteristics.
The research approach is used to decide the plan and procedure for the study and
includes steps form the wide assumptions to detailed methods of collection, analysis and
interpretation of the data (Creswell, 2014). Both the quantitative and qualitative research
approach is used to carry out the study. Quantitative approach is satiable for the objective
testing by evaluating the relationship between the variables (Creswell, 2014). Kothari (2019)
states the qualitative characteristics can be counted but cannot be computed.
Reliability Statistics
𝐻 1 : There is no significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Tangibility dimension.
𝐻 1: There is a significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Tangibility dimension. I
𝐻 2 : There is no significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Assurance dimension.
𝐻 2 : There is a significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Assurance dimension.
𝐻 3 : There is no significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Responsiveness dimension.
𝐻 3: There is a significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Responsiveness dimension.
𝐻 4 : There is no significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Empathy dimension.
𝐻 4 : There is a significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Empathy dimension.
𝐻 5 : There is no significant gap between the policyholder’s expected and perceived service
quality with respect to the Processing dimension.
𝐻 5: There is a significant gap between policyholders expected and perceived service quality
with respect to the Processing dimension.
This chapter includes the data presentation and interpretation done through SPSS, Microsoft
Excel and analyse via Descriptive Statistics and Graphs. It covers data in respect to
policyholder’s characteristics, and opinions in regard to dimensions of Service quality in motor
car insurance. The total respondents 168 samples with respect to the Hubli region.
4.1 Personal Information of Policyholder
Table 4.1: Demographic Profile of Policyholders
20%
Comprehensive
Third party
80%
Insurance Claimed
22%
78%
yes no
Tangibles
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
T1 T2 T3 T4
Expectation Perception
Assurance
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
Expectation Perception
Interpretation:
Assurance is defined as the ability and knowledge of the employees to motivate inspire and
trust, Assurance consists of a feeling of safety while transactions, politeness, and adequate
support (Yarimoglu,2014). Zaidatol et al,(2012) stated the interpretation of mean score as (1-2.33) low,
(2.34-3.67) moderate, and (3.68-5) high.
The chart 4.4 depicts expected and perceived service quality in respect to the assurance dimension,
here the statements are coded as A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, and A6 on the x-axis. Through the analysis
performed we could see the percived service quality is between the range of (2.34-3.67) which is
considerd as moderate were as the expectation of the policyholders falls between (3.68-5) which is
considerd high.
Responsiveness
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
R1 R2 R3
Expectation Perception
Emphaty
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
E1 E2 E3
Expectation Perception
Processing
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
P1 P2 P3 P4
Expectation Perception
Tangibles
5
4
3
2
Processing Assurance
1
0
Responsivenes
Emphaty
s
Interpretation:
SERVQUAL model is one of the established models for measuring quality of service,
introduced in 1985 by Parasuraman. Berry and Zeithmal. The model is used to analyse the wide
areas of organizations service quality and strengths and weaknesses, (Rahmana et al., 2014).
Zaidatol et al,(2012) stated the interpretation of the mean score as (1-2.33) low, (2.34-3.67)
moderate, and (3.68-5) high.
The Graph 4.8 represents the expected and perceived service quality in respect to
SERVQUAL dimensions, through the analysis we could see the average perceived mean score
is between (2.34-3.67) which is considered to be moderate with Tangibles (3.04) followed by
Assurance (3.01), empathy (3.01), further responsiveness (2.97) and processing (2.67) being
Kothari, (2004) states that the hypothesis simply means the assumption that should be proved
or disproved, he further states the research hypothesis can be a predictive form of statement, to
test the hypothesis paired t- test with 95% confidence was performed. Paired t- test is performed
to test the two samples that are related. (Kothari,2004).
Desai & kahar, (2017) states if the value of p is below 0.05 then the null hypothesis is
rejected and alternate hypothesis can be accepted, through the following testing of hypothesis
(Table 4.3) the value of Hypothesisi1, Hypothesisi2, Hypothesis 3, Hypothesisi4 and
Hypothesis 5 is less than 0.05 hence the null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is
accepted which implies there is a statically important difference between the expected and
perceived Service quality.
5.1 Findings
The study was conducted to assess the service quality of motor car insurance with respect to
Hubli region to achieve the finding the structured questionnaire was distributed to 168
policyholders pertaining to different motor car insurance companies within the area,
Descriptive Statistics was used to analyse the data through which the major finding was found
out as follows:
Through the study it was found out that the majority of the policyholder’s were male
with 81.5% and the rest 18.5% were females which shows the large numbers of car
penetration is among male.
Through the study it was also found out the level of employment have a positive effect
on the automobile purchases as we can see the majority of the policy holders were
employed with 75% followed by the students with 14.9%
The perceived mean value in context to the tangible dimension was in between (2.34-
3.67) which is indicates the perceived level of service quality of motor car insurance
in respect to tangible dimension was moderate.
In context to the expected mean value regarding the tangible dimension was in between
(3.68-5) which is indicates the expectation level of service quality in motor car
insurance of the policyholders in respect to tangible was High.
The perceived mean value in context to the assurance dimension was in between (2.34-
3.67) which is indicates the perceived level of service quality of motor car insurance
in respect to assurance dimension was moderate.
In context to the expected mean value regarding the assurance dimension was in
between (3.68-5) which is indicates the expectation level of service quality in motor
car insurance of the policyholders in respect to assurance was High.
The perceived mean value in context to the responsiveness dimension was in between
(2.34-3.67) which is indicates the perceived level of service quality of motor car
insurance in respect to responsiveness dimension was moderate.
In context to the expected mean value regarding the responsiveness dimension was in
between (3.68-5) which is indicates the expectation level of service quality in motor
car insurance of the policyholders in respect to responsiveness was High.
5.2 Conclusion
The aim of the research was to assess the service quality of motor car insurance using
SERVQUAL model and its dimension with respect to the Hubli region. Through the literature
it was found out that the service quality is more difficult to measure than product quality
because services are usually intangibles. As there is rising competition in service industries
service quality becomes extremely important. Consumers play a vital role in the insurance
sector the entry of foreign players has increased the competition in the industry. Understanding
the customers ever changing expectations is a vital step in auto insurance. Though the study it
was found out that overall perceived score within all SERVQUAL dimensions was between
(2.34-3.67) which is considered to be moderate but key concerning area was the processing
dimension as it deals with claims and process occurred during the claims the huge gap of
5.3 Recommendation
Based on the data analysis and the findings the following recommendation are suggested which
would help insurance companies to improve the service quality and the claim delivery system
in motor car insurance. Recommendations are:
1. To improve the service quality in motor car insurance.
2. To focus on the processing and the responsiveness dimensions.
3. To reduce the GAP between the expected and perceived quality of service in respect to
processing dimension.
4. To develop a system through which the claim processing time can be reduced.
5. To create awareness about the motor car insurance.
6.2 Websites:
IRDAI: www.irdai.gov.in
GIC: www.gicre.in
EIOPA: www.eiopa.europa.eu
Accenture: www.accenture.com
Bajaj Allianz: www.bajajallianz.com
IBEF: www.ibef.org
Questionnaire
Dear Respondent,
I request you to fill in your response to the following questions. This is purely for academic
purposes. Further, we will assure you that the information provide by you will be kept
confidential and will not be disclosed to anyone.
Thank you,
1. Name: ………………………………………………………………………….
2. Phone no: ...……………………………………………………………………..
3. Age: 18-28 28-38 38-48 48 & above
4. Gender: Male Female
5. Education: Pre- University Under-Graduation Post-Graduation Others
6. Occupation: student Employed Unemployed
7. Model of car: ………………………………………………………………………
8. Year of Purchase: ………………………………………………………………….
9. Name of the insurance: ……………………………………………………………
10. Type of policy: Comprehensive Third party
11. Insurance Expiry: …………………………………………………………………
12. Did you claim your insurance: Yes No
Your insurance 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
company’s physical
facilities are SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
visually appealing
Your insurance 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
company’s
employees are well SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
dressed and appear
neat
The appearance of 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
the physical
facilities of your SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
insurance office is
in keeping with the
type of services
provided
Assurance:
Your insurance 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
company promises
to do something on SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
time, it does so
Is your insurance 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
company
dependable SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
Does your 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
insurance company
provide its services SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
at the time it
promises to do so
Does your 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
insurance company
keep its record SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
accurately
Responsiveness:
Your insurance 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
company does tell
customers when SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
services will be
performed
Employees of your 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
insurance company
are willing to help SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
customer
Does your 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
insurance company
employees will SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
never be too busy
to respond to its
customers
Empathy:
Is your insurance 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
company’s
employees being SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
polite
Does your 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
insurance
company’s SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
employees give
personal attention
Employees of your 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
insurance company
know what your SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
need are and
addresses
immediately
Processing:
Claim process 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
was carried on in
SD D N A SA SD D N A SA
time