Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IndianJOtol282149-3662248 101022
IndianJOtol282149-3662248 101022
199]
Case Report
Abstract
The study highlights the management protocol of a large mastoid cholesteatoma presenting with sudden‑onset facial palsy mimicking a
complicated otitis media and literature review. Congenital cholesteatoma may affect various regions of the temporal bone, the mastoid process
being the least frequently involved. The diagnosis is often missed, specifically when the patient presents with features of mastoiditis. Radiology
plays an important role in clenching the diagnosis. Congenital (mastoid) cholesteatoma manifesting with features of complicated otitis media
is a rare occurrence and needs familiarity to facilitate early diagnosis and appropriate management.
Discussion
a b
CC arises from an epidermoid cyst from a congenital remnant
of the keratinizing squamous epithelium of the temporal Figure 3: (a) Huge mastoid cavity after removal of cholesteatoma showing
bone.[6] the intact posterior fossa dura. (b) Completely healed postoperative cavity
at 18‑month follow‑up
CC of mastoid origin has the following characteristics:
1. The initial presentation is usually pain in the neck and 3. MRI scanning shows little or no peripheral enhancement
mastoid region on postcontrast T1‑weighted images and hyperintensity
2. CT scan shows an expansile, cystic lesion occupying on T2‑weighted images.[1,7,8]
the mastoid process without involving the middle ear,
which may compress the cerebellum and the dural sinuses Similar presenting complaints and radiological appearance
adjacent to it and/or erode the bony labyrinth can be noted in our case as well [Figures 1 and 2]. However,
facial nerve palsy as a presenting complaint with features of Warren et al. presented a case series of nine patients who they
acute mastoiditis is rare. divided into mastoid‑only cholesteatoma and mastoid and
middle ear cholesteatoma groups. The former group tends to
Hidaka et al. reported a similar case where the patient presented
be clinically silent as the lesion does not impinge upon any
with postauricular swelling and pain as the presenting
critical neurovascular structures and shows a higher incidence
complaint. Along with mastoid abscess, the patient also had an
of dural exposure, facial nerve exposure, and auditory canal
isolated mastoid CC with the erosion of posterior fossa bony
erosion.[11] Our patient fits into the mastoid‑only group and had
plate and sigmoid plate similar to the findings in our patient.[8] both dural exposure and facial nerve exposure.
As in most patients of CC, mastoid was well pneumatized in Giannuzzi et al., in their study, concluded that many cases,
our patient. Pnematization is not affected because inflammation which were reported as mastoid cholesteatoma in the past,
is absent in CC. Whereas, in acquired cholesteatoma were not true mastoid cholesteatoma and thereby detailed the
inflammation and pathologic changes of mucosa are more following characteristics of mastoid CC which differentiated
evident leading to sclerotic mastoid. Kojima et al. analyzed it from middle ear CC.
temporal bone pneumatization in 53 patients of CC, 27 (50.9%) 1. Presenting complaint – Neck and temporal region pain
and 16 (30.2%) had very good and good pneumatization, 2. Age at the presentation – Adulthood
respectively. They also found that otorrhea or otalgia was an 3. Findings at otoscopy – No abnormalities
initial symptom in 17.5% of the patients.[9] 4. Findings of imaging restricted to the mastoid process.
Potsic et al. described a staging system for CC, which are Based on their literature review, only 12 of the 20 reported
defined as follows: cases were true mastoid cholesteatomas. Our case fits the
• Stage I – Single quadrant: No ossicular involvement or description of true mastoid cholesteatoma in all aspects defined
mastoid extension by Giannuzzi et al.[12]
• Stage II – Multiple quadrants: No ossicular involvement
Our literature review on patients of CC who presented as
or mastoid extension
complicated otitis media is summarized in Table 1. We were
• Stage III – Ossicular involvement: It includes erosion of
able to find four such cases in the literature; however, one was
ossicles and surgical removal for eradication of disease;
deliberately omitted, as it was not in English.
no mastoid extension
• Stage IV – Mastoid extension (regardless of findings Informed consent
elsewhere). Informed consent was obtained from the patient included in
the study.
Their study showed a strong association between stage and
residual disease, ranging from a 13% risk in Stage I to 67% Declaration of patient consent
in Stage IV.[10] Our patient belongs to Stage IV according to The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate
their staging system, emphasizing the need for a regular long patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his
time follow‑up. consent for his images and other clinical information to be
reported in the journal. The patient understands that name 3. Bennett M, Warren F, Jackson GC, Kaylie D. Congenital cholesteatoma:
and initials will not be published, and due efforts will be made Theories, facts, and 53 patients. Otolaryngol Clin North Am
2006;39:1081‑94.
to conceal the identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. 4. Koltai PJ, Nelson M, Castellon RJ, Garabedian EN, Triglia JM,
Roman S, et al. The natural history of congenital cholesteatoma. Arch
Conclusion Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:804‑9.
5. Nager GT. Pathology of the ear and temporal bone. Williams & Wilkins;
• CC of mastoid origin is very rare and has specific Waverly Press, Inc., Baltimore.1993.
characteristics like late age of presentation, destruction 6. Mevio E, Gorini E, Sbrocca M, Artesi L, Lenzi A, Lecce S, et al.
of adjoining structures like posterior fossa bone, facial Congenital cholesteatoma of the mastoid region. Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg 2002;127:346‑8.
nerve canal, sigmoid plate, tegmen, and intact ossicular
7. Luntz M, Telischi F, Bowen B, Ress B, Balkany T. Imaging case study
chain of the month. Congenital cholesteatoma isolated to the mastoid. Ann
• CC presenting as mastoiditis, though a rare phenomenon, Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997;106:608‑10.
has to be kept in mind as these cases pose special surgical 8. Hidaka H, Ishida E, Kaku K, Nishikawa H, Kobayashi T. Congenital
challenges to the surgeon cholesteatoma of mastoid region manifesting as acute mastoiditis: Case
report and literature review. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:810‑5.
• Imaging of the temporal region helps the surgeon (a) to
9. Kojima H, Tanaka Y, Shiwa M, Sakurai Y, Moriyama H. Congenital
arrive at the diagnosis preoperatively, (b) to see the extent cholesteatoma clinical features and surgical results. Am J Otolaryngol
of disease, and (c) to do surgical planning. 2006;27:299‑305.
10. Potsic WP, Samadi DS, Marsh RR, Wetmore RF. A staging system
Financial support and sponsorship for congenital cholesteatoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Nil. 2002;128:1009‑12.
11. Warren FM, Bennett ML, Wiggins RH, Salzman KL, Blevins KS,
Conflicts of interest Shelton C, et al. Congenital cholesteatoma of the mastoid temporal
There are no conflicts of interest. bone. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1389‑94.
12. Giannuzzi AL, Merkus P, Taibah A, Falcioni M. Congenital mastoid
cholesteatoma: Case series, definition, surgical key points, and literature
References review. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120:700‑6.
1. Derlacki EL, Clemis JD. LX Congenital cholesteatoma of the middle ear 13. Santhi K, Tang IP, Nordin A, Prepageran N. Congenital cholesteatoma
and mastoid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1965;74:706‑27. presenting with Luc’s abscess. J Surg Case Rep 2012;2012:rjs026.
2. Levenson MJ, Parisier SC, Chute P, Wenig S, Juarbe C. A review 14. Tabook SM, Abdel Tawab HM, Gopal NK. Congenital cholesteatoma
of twenty congenital cholesteatomas of the middle ear in children. localized to the mastoid cavity and presenting as a mastoid abscess.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:560‑7. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2015;2015:305494.