Saeed Naqvi

Anil Dubey
Satish Amrut Tayade
Astha Savyasachi
Pradeep Gaur
Vikas Bajpai

Janhastakshep
 Janhastakshep: a campaign against fascist designs
Contact: drvikasbajpai@gmail.com; (M): 9717820427

The Nuh Communal Violence and the Conspiracy of the Hindutva

Brigade: A Ground Report by Janhastakshep

Introduction

A team of Janhastakshep toured areas of Palwal, Sohna and Gurugram, as also spoke
with other people from Nuh district on 3rd August 2023 to do a fact finding regarding
the incidents of communal violence that hit Nuh town and subsequently areas of
adjoining Palwal and Gurugram districts. The impact of this violence however was not
limited to just these three districts. Tension and alarm pervaded many more districts of
Haryana as also districts of adjoining states of Rajasthan (Alwar and Bharatpur) and
Mathura in Uttar Pradesh which have pockets of Muslim Meo population.

By the time of our visit many details of the incidents along with evidence by way of
eyewitness accounts, photographs and videos was available on various media platforms
and the same has been used to guide our fact finding effort. Janhastakshep team set
three fold objectives for our visit:

1. To confirm the facts on the ground in order to fill in the gaps in information in
available narratives of the events.

2. Based on these facts and conversations with the people in the area, gain deeper
understanding as to the specific motivations of the powers that be that were
instrumental in staging these events.

3. To make an assessment of the extent to which the RSS Hindutva Brigade has
succeeded in deepening religious polarization among people in the area towards
fulfillment of its political interests.

The team comprised of the following members:

 Noted journalist Sh. Saeed Naqvi

 Senior journalist and co-convener, Janhastakshep, Sh. Anil Dubey
1

 Independent IT professional Sh Satish, member Janhastakshep.

Page

 Journalist Astha Savyasachi

  Freelance Photo journalist Sh Pradeep, and
 Convener Janhastakshep, Dr Vikas Bajpai

The team collectively and individually interacted with different persons from the area to
get information and their perspectives. Unfortunately, the team could not meet / contact
anyone from the administration. Nevertheless, important documentary evidence was
collected which throws enough light on the administration‟s stance in the whole case. In
addition to other unnamed persons, among the important persons we interacted with
were:

 Sh Zafar Mewati Yaduvanshi, social activist and member of National Council of

All India Samyukt Kisan Morcha.
 Sh. Haider, advocate at Gurgaon District Court.
 Sh. Tahir Sahab, senior advocate, District Court, Nuh.
 Sh. Mahender Singh Chauhan, Palwal district secretary of All India Kisan Sabha
(AIKS).
 Sh. Tara Chand, All India Kisan Sabha, Palwal.
 Sh. Sher Mohammed, senior advocate at Palwal District Court and resident of
Roop Rakha village in Hatin Tehsil of Palwal district.

Before proceeding any further, we would like to express our deep sorrow over the death
of 6 people in the violence at Nuh including the two home guards Neeraj Khan and
Gursevak. Apart from that we extend our sympathies to the common people who were
caught in and injured during the violence.

The Context to Present Clashes in Nuh

The present developments in Nuh are very much rooted in the concerted efforts being
made by the Hindutva forces to upend every shred, every tradition, every economic link
of mutual dependence that have bonded together people following different religions
and embodying enormous diversity of India. The more is the syncretism of the people
that bridges their diversity, the greater have been the exertions of Sangh brigands to
render them asunder. Meo Muslims of Mewat region covering districts of Haryana,
Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, despite their conversion to Islam around 12th to 13th
century have been proud of their Hindu ancestry and continued to follow many
traditions, religious and social practices common to Hindus. This has invited the
attention of both the Hindu and Muslim fundamentalist elements. However, the Meo‟s
have become increasing target of the rightwing Hindu fundamentalist forces, especially
during the reign of the RSS-BJP government both at Centre and in the State of Haryana.
2

The more recent phase of attacks on the Meo Muslims can be traced back to the 2017
Page

wherein Pehlu Khan, an aged dairy farmer from Nuh district was lynched by cow
vigilantes on 1st April in Behror of the neighboring Alwar district of Rajasthan. The video
of the incident was well propagated by the perpetrators. On 16 February 2023, two
Muslim men – Junaid and Nasir, both residents of Ghatmeeka village in Rajasthan‟s
Bharatpur district were abducted by cow vigilantes of Bajrang Dal led by Monu
Manesar, were beaten up and burnt alive. The policemen at the Firozpur Jhirka police
station in Nuh district refused to intervene in the case when Junaid and Nasir were
taken to them in half dead state. Prior to this another Muslim man Waris had been
lynched likewise by Bajrang Dal goons led by Monu Manesar (The Wire, 2023 a). In May
2021, a gym trainer Asif Khan Mewati was killed likewise followed by holding of several
anti-Muslim panchayats in the area to demand the release of the arrested culprits (The
Wire, 2023 b)

This apart, in Gurugram, the district neighboring Nuh, repeated hue and cry has been
raised to obstruct Muslims from offering Friday Namaz even in places that had been
agreed to by the administration (The Wire, 2021). Little doubt then that the communal
cauldron was kept on the boil on a continuing basis, rendering the situation ripe for
bigger adventures.

It is to be noted that two persons – Monu Manesar and Bittu Bajrangi, allegedly with
full patronage of the state machinery and Hindutva forces have earned a reputation for
targeting and killing members of the minority community in the garb of cow vigilantes.
As such there is considerable resentment against them among Meos, especially the
Muslim youth of the area, which became an important factor during the recent
disturbances.

Acts of violence that have occurred in Nuh and adjoining areas

Major violence that shook Nuh and adjoining areas of larger Mewat happened on the 31
of July, 2023. This was followed by several other incidents that took place in district
Palwal on the 1st and 2nd of August, as also in Sohna town of district Gurugram and the
Gurugram city where the Imam of a Mosque in sector 57 was done to death. In Nuh per
se there were three major clashes that took place on the 31st of July. These were:

1. The clash between the Muslim youth and those participating in the „Jalabhishek
Yatra‟ called by VHP and the Bajrang Dal.

2. The attack that took place on the Cyber Crime Police Station, Nuh near Anaj Mandi,
Nuh.

3. The incident in which the ACJM (Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate) of Nuh, Ms
3

Anjali Jain and her 3 year old daughter Arnika were caught in the midst of violence
Page

leading to burning down of their car.

Of these three incidents, we could only gather substantive information on the first
instance of violence which was at the center of the entire sequence of events. Major part
of the report concerns this particular incident. As to the other two incidents we shall
present facts only to the extent we could appraise ourselves of.

We wish to emphatically state here that our team’s perspective is not to justify /
condone violence perpetrated from any side in the conflict, but only to evaluate the
circumstances that led to eruption of this reprehensible violence which has admittedly
not been witnessed in the Muslim majority Mewat region in last 75 years since
independence. The sole purpose of our investigation is to expose the nefarious designs
of the forces that be who might have vested interest in perpetrating such violent acts in
the days to come as well.

An account of the violence that occurred during the staging of the Nuh ‘Shobha
Yatra’

 A call had been given by the Bajrang Dal and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad for the
„Brijmandal Jalabhishek Yatra‟ to be taken out in Mewat on the 31 st of July 2023. The
yatra starts from the Nalhar Shiv Mandir, located a little distance outside the town of
Nuh surrounded by Aravali foothills, passes through the Nuh town and much of the
district up to Punhana (within Nuh district) covering a distance of about 40 km. The
practice of taking out this yatra started only since 2021 and had led to communal
tension in 2022 when the Mazar of a Muslim peer situated near to Nalhar temple had
been damaged during the yatra.

 Alongside the call for the yatra a concerted effort was made to raise the communal
temperature and provoke the local Muslims through social media posts. While
challenging Muslims to stop him if they can, Monu Manesar, accused of murdering
two Muslim men in April 2023, boasted that he shall be joining the yatra in person.
Likewise, another cow vigilante, Bittu Bajrangi, who originally hails from Bihar but
presently lives in Pali village of Faridabad district, in a provocative viral video inciting
Muslims before the yatra made oblique misogynist remarks for the Muslim women
saying that he shall be visiting his sasural (in-laws‟ home) referring to Mewat, even as
his supporters shouted in the background - “jijaji aa rahe hain” („brother-in-law is
coming‟). The Union Minister of State (without portfolio) in the cabinet of Prime
Minister Modi, Rao Inderjit Singh, questioning Bajrangi‟s video asked:

Someone said there were videos saying, „We are coming for this religious
function, your daamad (son-in-law) is coming. If you can stop, stop it‟. If
such irresponsible videos are uploaded, it causes a negative impact (Siwach,
2023).
4
Page
 In another viral video that is said to have been made during the riots, one Dinesh
Bharti of the Bharat Mata Vahini was seen waving a machete to incite people. Bharat
Mata Vahini is the organization that had also led the anti-namaz protests in
Gurugram. On the day of the yatra, before the yatra began, Surendra Kumar Jain who
claims to be the international Joint General Secretary of Vishwa Hindu Parishad,
delivered an inflammatory speech to the people gathered at Nalhar temple.

 All omens were pointing to a big communal conflagration in the making. On 1 August,
2023 district Nuh‟s intelligence chief was shown on India Today television channel as
claiming that he had forewarned of trouble were the yatra participants to walk
through the Muslim areas of Nuh, wielding arms and shouting slogans (Hindustan
Times, 2023). The same was reiterated in the Hindi daily Amar Ujala, Palwal edition,
of 3rd August. Cautionary notes were sounded by the civil society as well. „Mewat
Vikas Sabha‟, a civil society organization of the area said that the yatra proposed by
the Hindutva organizations was nothing but a “calculated” move to stir communal
violence in Muslim majority Nuh. Reportedly, the organization alleged that - “………
the administration allowed the Yatra to enter Mewat, and when the violence began,
the administration simply collapsed, and the police disappeared” (Savyasachi and
Tarushi, 2023).

 Unfortunately, the bait was bitten by some Muslim youth, with the possibly of some
anti-social elements joining in. Some retaliatory videos were uploaded by Muslim
youth as well in response to the provocation. As was put by Mahender Singh
Chaudhary of AIKS, Palwal – „Shuru to yeh Facebookiyon ki ladai ke roop mein hui
thi. Aam Hindu ya Musalman ka isse koi lena-dena nahin tha‟ (All of this started as a
duel between the wayward youth on the Facebook. Common Hindus or Muslims had
nothing to do with this).

On 31 July, 2023 the worst fears came true. As per the local people present in Nuh on
that day and other informed persons, the number of participants in the „shobha yatra‟
is estimated to be anywhere between 1500 to 3000. As per the information provided
by the same people, as also the videos of the yatra that have been in circulation, most
participants were young men. Advocate Sher Mohammad asserted that majority of
the yatries were between late teens to mid-twenties.

The yatra was anything but a peaceful religious affair. Many of the videos of the yatra
that are now floating in the social media show the yatries to be well armed with
swords, lathis and even fire arms. The above quoted report by Siwach published in
the Indian Express quotes the same union minister thus (Siwach, 2023):

Kisne hathiyar diye unko iss procession mein le jaane ke liye? Koi talwar
5

leke jata hai procession mein? Lathi-dande leke jata hai (Who gave
Page

weapons to them for the procession? Who goes to a procession carrying

 swords, or sticks)? This is wrong. A provocation took place from this side
too. I am not saying there was no provocation from the other side.

Even Bittu Bajrangi, who made it to the yatra said that (Livemint, 2023):

…….A few people carried weapons. But they were all licensed. The swords
we carried at the yatra, are used for puja and rituals, not for murders.

 From the foregoing account, from various media reports and videos available online
and even by admission of the ministers of the ruling party itself, not only was the
violence witnessed during the Nuh „sobha yatra‟ a clash between the participants in
the yatra on one side and the local Muslim youth on the other side, but that both
sides had prepared themselves for the showdown. Nonetheless, the BJP government
in Haryana is post-haste seeking to put the entire blame of the violence on Muslims.
The Chief Minister, Manohar Lal Khattar and the Home Minister of the state Anil Vij
have both claimed that the Nuh violence was a pre-planned conspiracy. Addressing
media persons Khattar said (Hindustan Times, 2023):

It was a pre-planned attack that points towards a larger conspiracy as the

procession, which was attacked, has been taking place annually for the
past several years (emphasis ours) ……

Haryana home minister Anil Vij as well asserted likewise while addressing the media
on 2 August, 2023 (Hindustan Times, 2023). Not only this, Vij even went to the
extent of rumor mongering by alleging that about 3000 to 4000 devotees had been
kept captive by the Muslim rioters in the Nalhar temple (Oneindia News, 2023), a
claim that was roundly rubbished by the temple priest Deepak Sharma who told „The
Wire‟ that:

How is it possible to keep these people hostage? They were in the shelter of
the almighty. But suddenly they got to know that the situation outside is
not good. Since the situation outside became bad, people got trapped
inside (the temple), …..

Nonetheless, what is more dangerous is that the government has already set in
motion the process for one-sided persecution of the Muslims, at least as is reflected
from the F.I.R.s (First Information Reports) that have been filed by the police in the
specific case of rioting in the yatra. Though these F.I.R.s were not yet available in the
public realm, Janhastakshep could access primary F.I.R.s regarding the violence in
Nuh on 31st July through the advocates in Nuh. The description of events in the
F.I.R.s is noteworthy indeed.
6
Page
What do the F.I.R.s lodged with regard to different incidents tell?

As told to media by Haryana‟s home minister, Anil Vij, 102 FIRs have been lodged and
200 people have been arrested by the Haryana police in connection with incidents
related to communal disturbance in Nuh and adjoining areas (PTI, 2023). As on 3rd
August Janhastakshep managed access to copies of 14 FIRs – 7 each registered in Nuh
City and Palwal City police stations. All the FIRs registered in Nuh City police station
were concerning incidents that took place on 31st of July, 2023 and were registered on
the 1st of August, 2023.

These FIRs are – FIR No. 0252, FIR No. 0253, FIR No. 0254, FIR No. 0255, FIR No.
0256, FIR No. 0257 and FIR No. 0258 (Annexures 1 to 7). Of these, FIR Nos. 0252,
0254, 0255 and 0256 are concerning the clash between Muslim protesters and those
taking part in the „Jalabhishek Sobha Yatra.‟ FIR No 0253 and FIR No 0257 concern the
attack on policemen at Cyber Thana, Nuh which give the sites of incidents in the
respective FIRs as „Cyber Thana, Nuh‟ and „near Anaj Mandi, Nuh‟. FIR No. 0258
concerns the incident involving the ACJM Anjali Jain and her 3 year old daughter
Arnika. The table below gives certain salient features of these FIRs for us to surmise
from:

Table: Details of the FIRs regarding violence in Nuh on 31st July, 2023
available with Janhastakshep.
FIR Under sections Place of Timing Investigating Names of policemen (of diff.
No. incident of officer ranks) mentioned in the FIR.
incident
0252+ 148, 149, 332, 353, Nuh Adbar From 2 pm Ajay Kumar Pankaj Kumar, Poker Ram, Sandip,
186, 307, 295-A of Chowk to 3 pm Sanjay, Vikram, Gaurishankar,
IPC 1860 & 25 of
Arms Act 1959.

0254+ 148, 149, 332, 353, Jhanda From 1.30 Surjeet Singh Ravindra Kumar, Ombir Singh
186, 307, 435 of Park, Nuh to 3 pm
IPC & 25 of Arms city
Act.

0255+ 148, 149, 435, 295- Near From 2 pm Surjeet Singh Anil Kumar, Dinesh Yadav, Babulal
A, 307 of IPC & 25 Jhanda to 3 pm
of Arms Act. Chowk,
Nuh
0256+ 148, 149, 435, 295- Delhi- 2 pm to 3 Bharat Singh Brijendra Kumar, Vishwajit
A, 307 of IPC & 25 Alwar road, pm
of Arms Act. Nuh

0253++ 148, 149, 186, 332, Cyber At 3.30 Sanjeet Suraj, Sudhir, Dharmendra, Suresh,
353, 427, 435, 436, Thana, pm Surendra, Gulshan, Raghubir Singh,
395, 397 of IPC Nuh Ravikant, Shubham, Pradeep
and 25 of Arms Kumar, Bhajanlal.
Act.

0257++ 147, 148, 149, 186, Near Anaj 2 pm to 4 Surjeet Singh Ajay Kumar, Devendra, Arun, Shera,
7

302, 307, 332, 342, Mandi, pm Pawan Kumar, Neeraj*, Gursevak*,

353, 379 B, 120 B, Nuh Manvir Singh, Devendra, Rahul Dev,
Page

427 of IPC & 25 of personnel of the QRT (Quick

 Arms Act. Response Team) Dist. Manesar and
Subhan Khan**
0258+++ 148, 149, 435, 307 Near Old 1 pm to 3 Bharat Singh Siyaram, Subhan Khan, Harvinder,
of IPC & 25, 54, 59 Bus pm Bharat Singh
of Arms Act. Station,
Nuh
*Both Neeraj and Gursevak were employed as home guards in district Gurugram and were among the first two
casualties of this violence. **Subhan Khan is the lone Muslim police personal mentioned in all the FIRs quoted here.
For details of the incidents described in the FIRs please refer to the relevant annexures. + These are the FIRs
concerning the violence that took place in the yatra. ++ The FIRs are related to the attack on Cyber Thana, Nuh. +++
This FIR pertains to the incident in which the car of ACJM was burned.

Salient points of these FIRs

With the caveat that Janhastakshep did not have access to all the FIRs related to various
incidents of violence in Nuh and adjoining areas, we would still stress that the FIRs
mentioned above do provide us information about the most important incidents which
enable the following observations.

 All the seven FIRs registered at Nuh city police station make reference only to Muslim
community in different ways. For example it is said – “A crowd of 600 / 700
infuriated antisocial elements were shouting slogans of „Allah hu Akbar‟ (FIR No.
0252); or “Just as Mewat Dharmik Jalabhishek Yatra reached near Jhanda Park, all
of a sudden around 600 / 700 persons belonging to one community ……” (FIR No.
0254); or “…… At that time an aggressive crowd of 500 / 600 belonging to Meo
Muslim Community carrying sticks, rods, stones and illegal arms …..” (FIR No. 0255).

The reference to the other side is only as participants in the „Dharmik Yatra‟
(Religious procession).

 There is no mention whatsoever in the FIRs of violence, including use of firearms,

unleashed from the side of those taking out so called „Dharmik Yatra.‟ The portends
of this are clear, that in the FIRs only one side is the culprit while the side
represented by Bajrang Dal and VHP rabble rousers are the victims, all the videos
showing the violence indulged in by the Hindutva goons notwithstanding. Such a
framing of the events in the FIRs also means that there shall be arrests only of the
Muslim youth, as has already started happening.

 Except for the FIR No. 0253 (regarding incident at Cyber Thana, Nuh) which states
that – “……. during the Mewat Dharmik Jalabhishek Yatra the infuriated attacking
crowd of thousands, in concurrence, suddenly surrounded police station Cyber
Crime, Nuh from all sides …….”, all the other FIRs estimate the size of Muslim crowd
to be between 500 to 700. In the incident involving ACJM the crowd strength is
stated to be only 100 to 150.
8
Page
 In comparison, as per the information we collected from local sources and as per the
claims of the Bajrang Dal and VHP itself, even the maximum strength of the Muslim
crowd at 700 was less than half of the estimated strength of 1500 to 2000 that took
part in the yatra.

This singular fact shows that the common Muslims of Nuh by and large succeeded in
not getting provoked by the vitriolic build up to the yatra by the Hindutva brigands.
On the other hand most of the mobilization of the yatris had been done from other
districts of Haryana.

 It is acknowledged even by the Haryana government ministers and other ruling party
politicians that the police arrangements were woefully short of the requirement.
However, in the table above what is interesting to note is that in Nuh where more
than 80 percent population is Muslim, there seems to be near absence of Muslim
police personnel among those manning the arrangements for the Yatra. In all the
FIRs taken together, there appears the name of just one Muslim constable Subhan
Khan, who also, as it appears from the FIRs, was not actually deployed for
maintenance of law and order duty on the fateful day.

Likewise, there is not even one Muslim among the investigating officers in any of the
FIRs. It is well acknowledged that the proportion of Muslims in government services
at large and the forces in particular is grossly short of their proportion in the
population; however, in Nuh this paradox seems to have been enhanced to the
ultimate extent.

We do not know whether to call it an irony or a tragedy. Apart from constable Subhan
Khan, the other Muslim police personnel, albeit of a marginal hierarchy (a
homeguard), was Neeraj Khan, who is named only as Neeraj in FIR No. 0257. Neeraj
like, others who died or were injured, or suffered loss of livelihood and property in
the violence was a victim of the games that ruling classes play.

Without casting aspersions on individual policemen and officers even in the least, it
need be said that this situation cannot but bode ill for any expectation of justice being
done in the incidents that happened in Nuh. There are umpteen precedents to suggest
so; the massacres of Muslim men at Maliana and Hashimpura of Uttar Pradesh in
1987 are just two cases in the point.

Incidents of violence in the adjoining areas

After the violence in Nuh on 31st July there was a spillover of tension and violence to
9

adjoining districts. Janhastakshep team had a chance to visit Palwal district and Sohna
Page
town of district Gurugram as part of this inquiry since incidents continued to be
reported from there. Like in Nuh, in Palwal as well there seemed little support among
comm0n Hindus or Muslims for the violence sought to be orchestrated. On the day of
our visit a few dozens or so members of Bajrang Dal and VHP had sought to block traffic
on the Delhi – Agra highway in response to the nationwide call by VHP, but the attempt
was a damp squib with a face saving show of blockade being arranged with police help.

It was told by the activists and district leaders of the All India Kisan Sabha that RSS had
been active in their area for past few years. They have been guiding a group of lumpen
youth in the town that was mainly responsible for communal nonsense. One Munish
Bhardwaj, who claims to be the leader of Bajrang Dal in Palwal, runs a group of some
100 to 150 youth, most of whom are unemployed, belonging largely to the upper caste
Thakurs and Brahmins. They have also been trying to align some Gujjar boys with them.

It was reported that this group led by Munish Bhardwaj was responsible for the attacks
on some mosques (Kali masjid, Peerwali Masjid, Aheria wali masjid and the Idgah) in
the town and beating up the maulavis and worshipers. They also burnt some shops of
Muslim kabadis (knacker shops) and the shantis of Rohingia refugees in Parashuram
colony at Mandkola road. Even though there wasn‟t any large scale violence in Palwal
but it is only the Muslim business establishments and places of worship that bore the
brunt of communal violence.

On 1st August the police did round up some 15 to 20 Bajrang Dal members and filed
cases against them, but these men were subsequently released under the pressure
brought on by the Hindutva groups. At least until 4th August Janhastakshep could access
seven FIRs which been registered regarding these various incidents.

A mob of around 200 men attacked the Shahi Jama Masjid in Sohna at 2 pm on the 1 st
of August. The caretakers of the Mosque and around 50 children who study at the
madarsa located in the mosque could save their lives by hiding in the inner rooms of the
mosque. The Janhastakshep team also saw many shops and some vehicles burnt down
in the main market at Ambedkar Chowk in Sohna.

In all, the violence has so far left 6 persons dead and more than 50 injured. The dead
include two home guards – Neeraj Khan and Gursevak, 34 year old Shakti Saini, a
confectioner in Nuh, 29 year old Md. Hafiz Saad – the Naib Imam of Anjuman Jama
Masjid, Sector 57, Gurugram, Abhishek of Panipat who had come for the yatra and
Pradeep Sharma, a 32 year old Bajrang Dal worker.
10
Page
Gurugram, Haryana, India - 2023/08/03: General view of vandalized and burnt street shops along the streets of Ambedkar chowk in Sohna after the

11
communal violence.

Page
A man looks at his burned motorcycle at Ambedkar chowk in Sohna after the communal violence. The violence that erupted in the Nuh district of

12
Haryana on 31 July 2023, steadily spread in Sohna Chowk, where several shops and hand cart were burnt into ashes by the mob, Sohna, Gurugram,
Haryana, India.

Page
 13
A Haryana police personnel walking in front of burned shops at Ambedkar chowk in Sohna after the communal violence.

Page
 14
Rapid Action Force (RAF) personnel at Ambedkar chowk in Sohna after the communal violence.

Page
 15
A man looks at his burnt food shop at Ambedkar chowk, Sohna, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Page
Anjuman Jama Masjid, Sector 57, Gurugram where the 29 yeal old Naib Imam Md. Hafiz Saad.

16
Page
The questions that beget an answer

The foregone description leaves us with two important questions that need be answered
here:

1. What exactly was the game plan of the Hindutva forces behind engineering this
violence?

2. What has been the fate of the game plan and for what reasons?

In a commentary – „The Nuh Straws in the Wind‟, published in „The Tribune‟ Rajesh
Ramachandran writes:

The unfortunate communal riots in Nuh have thrown up a clutch of straws in

the wind. An electorally weak situation often necessitates communal
polarisation for certain incumbents. Haryana‟s state of affairs does not afford
any comfort for the BJP, which may find its nine-year-old double-engine
anti-incumbency debilitating, to say the least. The Vishva Hindu Parishad-
Bajrang Dal shobha yatra should be seen and understood in this context.

The RSS led brigade has a flourish of multi-forked frontal organizations whose storm
troopers have been deployed to act as a force multiplier towards fulfillment of political
expedience. The aggressive ingress by the Hindutva communal hordes into the only
Muslim dominated district in Haryana and the National Capital Region was nothing but
a calculated game plan to suite BJP‟s prospects in the electoral duels in the run-up to
and further in the 2024 general elections.

Deciphering this is hardly a work of genius. It is simple common sense, especially as

precipitating communal polarisation is something that constitutes a matter of principle
for the Hindutva forces.

Given the political situation as it obtains on date in the country, the exertions of VHP –
Bajrang Dal combine in Nuh – Mewat betray signs of ominus apprehensions on part of
the Hindutva forces. In a small living room of a local Jat leader of AIKS, both Hindu and
Muslim lawyers, social activists, panchayat leaders spoke in and out of turn, each being
the other‟s proxy. Their unambiguous message was:

Jats took no part in the yatra which was armed with swords and rods. The
Bajrang Dal plan was to have at least a hundred martyrs, their bodies to be
paraded throughout the Hindi belt – Godhra on a larger scale. The
participants in the „Jalabhishek Yatra‟ were brought from various districts of
Haryana as the proverbial „sacrificial lambs‟ imbued with ignorance about
17

their possible fate.

Page
Credence is lent to this view of creating „Godhra on a larger scale‟ by the series of
deliberate missteps by the state government in the build up to the situation seen on 31 st
July in Nuh. The intelligence reports of impending conflagration were the yatra to be
allowed in to Muslim areas with people wielding arms was not heeded to. No measures
were taken to stop the vitriolic and highly provocative videos from being widely
circulated on the social media in the build up to the yatra.

The SP (Superintendent of Police) of Nuh, Varun Singla proceeded on leave just on the
anvil of the yatra. It was reported by the gentlemen sitting in the Jat leader‟s living room
that two possible reasons for Singla being allowed to proceed on leave were being
floated. First version was that the SP had foreseen the consequences of the
developments taking place, and when the government did not pay heed to his advice he
proceeded on leave. As per the second version, the government itself sent him on leave
in order to facilitate the Bajrang Dal - VHP game plan, and gave additional charge of
Nuh to the Palwal SP Lokender Singh to hamstring effective police arrangements for
preventing communal clash. It is rather strange that these acts of omission and
commission failed to draw the attention of the Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar and
the state home minister Anil Vij, especially as both asserted subsequently that whatever
happened was the result of a well-planned conspiracy, or is it that they have discovered
one post factum?

The prior intelligence reports of possible disturbance notwithstanding, muddle-

headedness of the government is also reflected in the fact that different ministers of the
government are speaking in different voices. As against the belated conspiracy theory of
the Chief Minister and the Home minister, the Deputy Chief Minister of Haryana
Government, Dushyant Chautala, who belongs to the coalition partner „Jannayak Janta
Party‟ that represents the Jat interests in the main, told the Indian Express in an
interview that (Express News Service, 2023):

There was an incident yesterday and I feel that the management was not at its
best. The SP (Superintendent of Police, Nuh) was on leave due to a family
situation and the charge was given to the SP of a neighbouring district who
could not assess the situation in a better manner. …… No one expected or saw
the whole scenario to be like this, where suddenly people collected to start the
Shobha Yatra and then mobs from various directions walked in.

It is not just a classic case of left hand not knowing what the right one is doing, but that
of the index finger no knowing what the ring finger is doing. While the Haryana Chief
Minister asserted that there are no cases registered against Monu Manesar in Haryana,
his Home Minister said that there are cases registered against him in both Rajasthan
and Haryana. Queerly enough the state CID is not under the home minister, which
charge has been usurped by the Chief Minister, leaving Anil Vij clueless about vital
18

information (Nagpal, 2023). Nonetheless, both the Chief Minister and his Home
Minister gave a clean chit to Monu Manesar in the instant case.
Page
The gentlemen involved in the discussion concurred that:

Given the demographic geography of the area, had the Muslim youth, also
armed, wanted to take out their grudge on the participants in the yatra as
such, then they were in a position to surround and kill the yatris
indiscriminately, but they showed restraint even though Muslim shops and
houses were gutted. Their rage was specifically directed against Monu
Manesar and Bittu Bajrangi. When they could not locate the duo among the
yatris, the Muslim crowd set the vehicles accompanying the yatra on fire
considering the possibility that the wanted culprits could be hiding in them.

It bears mention here that in an interview given on 2nd August, 2023 by Dheeraj Gaba of
the „Rashtriya Mazdoor Kisan Manch‟ to a Haryana based media outlet „Vishwaprem
Samachar Patra‟ it was told that barely 15 days before the „Brijmandal Jalabhishek Yatra‟
another „Kanwar Yatra‟ had been taken out through Nuh. Not even one pebble was
tossed or a slogan raised against that yatra (Vishwaprem Samachar Patra, 2023). This
much should suffice to understand the possible game plan of the Hindutva communal
forces in instigating this communal conflagration.

The question remains – did the game plan succeed? In light of the findings and the
discussion foregone, we feel obliged to state that if the purpose of the communal flare up
in several districts of Haryana was to condition the electoral trend in Rajasthan, create
the “suitable” mood for the 2024 general elections, boost chances of Haryana Chief
Minister Manohar Lal Khattar‟s third term and spread some tension in the National
Capital Region, we are afraid the BJP will have to do better.

This gambit of the rightwing Hindu communal forces did not quite succeed and we hope
that the people shall persevere to fail such nefarious designs in future as well.
Janhastakshep team found some very encouraging signs of this in the area.

Much to BJP‟s chagrin, an obstacle in their path is the evolving Jat-Muslim social
cohesion. To to make way for politics of polarization this almost organic Jat-Muslim
evolution has to be disrupted.

On 31st July some Muslim laborers from another village in Palwal district were beaten
up near Mandkola village, which lies on the border of Palwal and Nuh districts, by the
Pandit and Thakur youth associated with Bajrang Dal. Even as the laborers hid
themselves in the bushes along the Gurgaon canal that passes along the Mandkola
village, the local Jats came out to save the laborers and gave a thrashing to the upper
caste lumpen youth of the Bajrang Dal.

A local adage in the region of Mewat goes thus – „Meo kahe ka Musalman, aur Jat kahe
ka Hindu‟ (A Meo Muslim is hardly a Muslim, just as a Jat Hindu is hardly a Hindu).
19

Mahendra Singh Chauhan, the district secretary of AIKS put it strait when he stated
that:
Page
 Jats are aware that all of this has been staged by the BJP for their political
objectives. They also nurse a grouse against the BJP for its attitude towards
Jat agitation demanding reservations in jobs, for calling Jats as anti-national
during the farmers‟ movement when the BJP gave the slogan „35 biradari ek
taraf, aur Jat ek taraf‟ (of all the 36 segments among the Hindus, the rest 35
should isolate the Jats). The treatment met out by the Central government to
the women wrestlers (all Jat) in their agitation against sexual harassment by
the BJP MP and the then President of the WFI (Wrestling Federation of
India), Brij Bhushan Singh was almost the last nail in the coffin of Jats‟
affection for the ruling party.

BJP too is aware of this sentiment among the Jats, and so they are making an
all-out effort to project it as an issue above the interest of the party. They are
seeking to project it as a fight to safeguard the interest of all Hindus vis-a-vis
the Muslims. An attempt was made by the local Hindutva leaders to organize
a panchayat at Jat dominated Mandkola village which failed to elicit any
enthusiasm among the Jats.

However, a solidarity built on shared animosity for a common adversary is hardly the
stuff that can be relied upon to build a credible resistance to divisive agendas devised to
undermine entire society and the country as such. The emerging solidarity between the
Jats and the Meos appeared to be more organically grown.

On 3rd August, 2023 a panchayat was held in the Meo majority village Kot Gaon,
situated close to Mandkola village, where in leaders of both the Hindu and Muslims Pals
(socially the equivalent of the Jat Khaps) got together. Among the Meos leaders of
Chiraklot Pal, Demroth Pal and Mangariya Pal were present, while on the side of the
Hindus Rawat Pal, Sanrot Pal and Sehrawat Pal were represented. The prominent
individuals who attended were:

 Chaudhary Manoj Rawat, Chairman Zila Parishad, Palwal

 Gopal Sarpanch, Village Nangal Tabaab
 Vijay Sarpanch, Village Pahadi
 Mohit, Ex-sarpanch, Village Aharwan
 Zakir Hussain, Chairman Block Samiti, Hatin
 Chaudhary Tayyib Hussain, Village Bheemsika
 Bilal Ahmad, Sarpanch, Kot Gaon
 Chaudhary Zafar, Ex-sarpanch, Kot Gaon
 Chaudhary Ahmat Kot
 Yakub, Sarpanch, Village Anaula

The panchayat resolved to maintain formidable unity among Hindus and Muslims
20

against the attempts being made to drive the deep communal wedge.
Page
The Meos of village Ghagot were assured by the Jats of Alawalpur village that anyone
eying to harm the Muslims shall first have to contend with them. One only hopes that
this is just the beginning.

The progressive Meo farmer leader who helped greatly in our investigation has retained
his name which clearly reveals his ancestry – Zafar Mewati Yaduvanshi. It is a tragedy
that in our caste-religion ridden system, the integrated aspects of Meo culture have not
found multitudes of admirers. Most people are simply unaware of the role of the
Mewatis / Meo Muslims in the 1857 war of independence when Meos in their thousands
faced death, torture, confiscation of property and humiliation for actively taking part on
the side of the rebels (Aijaz Ahmad, 1994). Sitting in his house in Sohna, Zafar
Yaduvanshi informed us of the Roopraka village of the Palwal block of Palwal district
that had lent more than 400 martyrs in the first war of independence. But of course
such stories do not suite the Hindutva narrative of Nationalism for it would threaten to
unravel the entire Hindutva project. The simple demand of the residents of Roopraka
village that a chapter be included in the history books about the sacrifices entailed by
their ancestors towards the National cause cannot but be treated as another blasphemy
by the RSS-BJP Zealots for which the Meos ought to be taught a lesson.

Homeguard Neeraj Khan‟s family is one of the bearers of such integrated culture. His
cousin‟s name is Sukhdev, while wife is called Vakeela and brother in law Salim (Raj and
Sur, 2023). It is a reflection on our society that we come to know the salience of these
names through a communal riot, even as many more Neeraj Khans and Muslim
Sukhdevs wait to be discovered. We just hope that the work of this most eminent
treasure hunting shall not be left to riots yet to be staged.

To our great delight we discovered that there remains enormous possibility of

cultivating admirers for all that is syncretic, progressive, and rejuvenating in the
cultures of varying people who constitute this enormous mass of humanity called India.
Such a possibility at least in the context of Mewat was enlivened by the historic 2020-21
Farmers‟ Movement.

As per Zafar Yaduvanshi‟s submission, as also that of the members of AIKS, the
Farmers‟ movement played an important role in welding the Jat-Muslim unity in the
region, wherein the Meos stood shoulder to shoulder with the Jats.

The Jats of Palwal, Sohna, Gurugram sentimentally remember “our Sikh brothers”. The
generosity with which they opened “langars” or feeding centres is the stuff of legends in
the Jat belt. To run these large feeding Centers over months, the Sikh organization
occasionally needed help from Jats. In one instance the Centers needed hundreds of
liters of milk.

Jats, who once kept cows and buffalos have, in many instances moved on to other means
21

of livelihood. It is the Gujjars who now keep dairy animals, but being traditionally
Page
opposed to Jats they refused to help in this instance. The shortfall in milk was made up
by Meo Muslim dairy farmers, a fact that the Jats will never forget.

As informed by Zafar, the Jats had boycotted the Meos after the Tablighi Jamat
controversy during the covid pandemic. One such village that faced such boycott was
Marokhda. The bridging of distances during the Farmers‟ movement made the Jats
realize their mistake for which they tendered an unconditional apology to the Meos.
Even in the recent agitation by women wrestlers, who happen to be Jats, the community
again had total support from Muslims in the area.

Whether and how will this unity be forged in future will depend upon what is done to
bring people cutting across differences of caste, religion or creed together in struggles to
forge a new society.

It is on the basis of this reality that Mahender Chauhan asserted that:

The Jats are not going to go with the BJP, and without the Jats the BJP‟s
design is not going to go anywhere.

Lest it be missed, it need be mentioned that when the vandals attacked the Shahi Masjid
in Sohna on the 1st of August, it were the local Sikhs who conducted a rescue operation
amid the clashes and saved the mosque‟s Imam, his family and a group of 10-12 children
studying at the madrasa.

Conclusion

India is indeed passing through difficult times under the Fascist rule of the RSS-BJP
government at the Centre as indeed in some of the bigger and populous states of the
country. The people are in the throes of a deep crisis socially, economically and
politically. One can hardly under-estimate the crisis when new trouble spots are being
made to erupt even as the earlier ones continue to smoulder. Even as Manipur continues
to burn and witness mayhem, Mewat has been set ablaze by the Hindutva hordes. When
the rulers have no solution to peoples‟ problems keeping them mired in one crisis after
another, each possibly bigger than the earlier one, is perhaps the only solution our rulers
can think of, and this precisely is what the RSS-BJP attempted to do in Nuh-Mewat
through their frontal organizations. One can only expect their desperation to acquire
more grotesque forms. However, what our report reveals is that the shenanigans of the
Sangh brigade can be defeated by the people.

The RSS-BJP and their cohorts are what they are, but here we feel the need to call out
the cagy attitude of the opposition ruling class parties when it comes to dealing squarely
22

with the Hindu majoritarian forces. Tall leaders of the opposition have visited Manipur,
as they should have, but Mewat is just next door and yet none among them have had
Page

time beyond giving statements in the media to try and assuage the people on ground.
Such live concern for the peoples‟ misery could well help give a fillip to the larger people
driven peace processes locally.

An important conclusion of our report is that the unity of Jats and Meos has emerged as
a bulwark against the communal designs of the Hindutva hordes. Most importantly, this
unity was forged through the glorious struggle the farmers fought over the livelihood
issues common to both the Hindu and Muslim farmers of the region. The lesson to be
drawn is that peoples‟ unity against the divisive designs of the ruling classes can only be
built by waging united struggles towards securing their lives, livelihoods and a shared
vision of their collective future.

The shenanigans to divide and break the people by the forces of the right wing Hindu
communal forces may perhaps intensify further with their growing trepidation. It will
take the entire society, especially the oppressed to stage a fight back. Offering a mere
lament at the state of affairs only implies surrender before the status quo.

Our demands

1. There should be free and fair independent inquiry by a sitting judge of the „Punjab
and Haryana High Court‟ or the „Supreme Court‟ into the violence that unfolded in
Nuh and the adjoining areas in order to reveal the entire conspiracy behind the
violence and to fix the accountability of all responsible – from the topmost political
echelons in Haryana to the local level administration and the organizations
responsible for orchestrating the violence.

2. Those responsible for unleashing violence from either side should be clearly
identified and action be taken against them in accordance with the provisions of law.
The chief protagonists of this violence Bittu Bajrangi and Monu Manesar be arrested
immediately and booked under sections of IPC befitting of the grievousness of their
criminal actions.

3. The obvious bias in the F.I.R s which holds only the Muslim community to be
responsible for the violence witness in Nuh should be remedied immediately.

4. The one sided criminal action that has been initiated against the Muslims in Nuh by
way of demolition of their homes should stop forthwith and the due legal process be
followed in every case.

5. Steps should be initiated to ensure that the composition of the local police force and
civil administration reflects the demographic composition of the area to correct the
23

reigning bias against Muslims as regards their representation in the local

Page

administration.
References

 Astha Savyasachi and Tarushi Ashwani (2023): „Inter-religious clashes displace

Muslims in north India‟, TRT World, 2 August. Available from
https://www.trtworld.com/asia/inter-religious-clashes-displace-muslims-in-north-
india-14304561 on 5 August, 2023.

 Aijaz Ahmad (1994): „Chaudhary Mohammad Yasin Khan - Social Reformer of the
Mewatis‟, Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Vol. 55: 622-629.

 Express News Service (2023): „Nuh violence: Yatra management not at its best, strict
action will be taken against accused, says Haryana Deputy CM‟, 2nd August. Available
from https://indianexpress.com/article/india/haryana-dy-cm-dushyant-chautala-
nuh-communal-flare-up-8871079/ on 7th August, 2023.

 Hindustan Times (2023): „Attack on yatra „pre-planned‟, „conspiracy‟: Khattar,‟ 2

August. Available from https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/gurugram-
news/haryana-cm-nuh-violence-points-to-bigger-conspiracy-probe-ordered-
101690914787434.html on 5 August, 2023.

 Livemint (2023): „Haryana Nuh violence: „Yatris carried swords for worship‟, says
Cow Vigilante Bittu Bajrangi.‟ Livemint, 2 August, 2023. Available from
https://www.livemint.com/news/india/haryana-nuh-violence-yatris-carried-swords-
for-worship-says-cow-vigilante-bittu-bajrangi-11691046649001.html on 5 August,
2023.

 Nagpal Bhavey (2023): „Khattar, Vij making contradictory statements on Monu

Manesar, says Hooda‟, Hindustan Times, 4th August. Available from
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/chandigarh-news/khattar-vij-making-
contradictory-statements-on-monu-manesar-says-hooda-101691089597703.html on
6 August, 2023.

 Oneindia News (2023): „Haryana Nuh violence : Anil Vij claims that people were held
hostage in temple are refuted by priest‟, 2 August. Available from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_7nVpXEpBE on 5 August, 2023.

 PTI (2023): „Over 200 arrested, 102 FIRs lodged in Nuh violence: Haryana minister
Vij‟, The Economic Times, 5 August. Available from
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/over-200-
arrested-102-firs-lodged-in-nuh-violence-haryana-minister-
24

vij/articleshow/102434182.cms?from=mdr&planGroup=ETPNoTrial&utm_source=
Page

Admitad&utm_medium=Affliate&src=Admitadtest&utm_campaign=881071_AdgBT
 Ogh-xoeXHi2d-1icv0bu&tagtag_uid=d8bd2daa0c4b52d43b60db087a4625f3 on 6
August, 2023.

 Raj Aishwarya and Arnabjit Sur (2023): „Didn‟t know situation was this serious: Kin
of home guards killed in Nuh clash‟, The Indian Express, 2 nd August. Available from
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/haryana-communal-clashes-home-
guards-family-killed-neeraj-nuh-communal-violence-8872134/ on 7th August, 2023.

 Siwach S (2023): „„Who gave weapons to the religious yatris at Nuh?‟ asks Union MoS
Rao Inderjit Singh.‟ Indian Express, 2 August. Available from
https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/rao-inderjit-singh-kanwar-yatras-
nuh-violence-religious-yatris-at-nuh-8872070/ on 5 August, 2023.

 The Wire (2023 a): „Haryana: Two Muslim Men Found Charred to Death in Alleged
Case of Cow Vigilantism.‟ Available from https://thewire.in/communalism/haryana-
two-muslim-men-found-charred-to-death-in-alleged-case-of-cow-vigilantism on 4
August 2023.) In May 2021, a gym trainer Asif Khan Mewati was killed likewise
followed by holding of several anti-Muslim panchayats in the area to demand the
release of the arrested culprits (The Wire, 2023 b) (The Wire (2023 b): „Haryana
Violence: How Provocative Videos and a Background of Hate Preceded the Nuh
Riots‟, 31 July. Available from https://thewire.in/communalism/haryana-violence-
mewat-hate-and-provocative-videos on 4 August 2023.

 The Wire (2021): „Muslims Should Not Offer Friday Prayers in Gurugram's Open
Spaces: Haryana CM Khattar,‟ 11 December. Available from
https://thewire.in/communalism/muslims-should-not-offer-friday-prayers-in-
gurugrams-open-spaces-haryana-cm-khattar on 5 August, 2023.

 Vishwaprem Samachar Patra (2023): „नूंह का वो सच जो आपने नही दे खा वो सच बता

रहा है यह बूंदा सच जानना है तो दे खो यह इूंटरव्य‟ (The truth of Nuh which you have not
seen is being told by this man. If you wish to know this truth, then watch this
interview), 2nd August. Available from नूंह का वो सच जो आपने नही दे खा वो सच बता
रहा है यह बूंदा सच जानना है तो दे खो यह इूंटरव्य #nuh #nuhnews | By Vishwaprem
Newspaper- ववश्वप्रेम समाचार पत्र | Facebook on 7th August, 2023.
25
Page
 Annexure 1
HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

1. District
ǔ«›ȡNUH P.S.
ȡ“ȡCITY NUH Year
Ÿ[

FIR No.
Ĥ Ǘǐš Ȳ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€


2. S.No. Acts
\ͬ’Ǔ“™˜ Sections
’ȡšȡ
fȱ

Đ Ȳ
1 IPC 1860 148
2 IPC 1860 149
3 IPC 1860 332
4 IPC 1860 353
5 IPC 1860 186
6 IPC 1860 307
7 IPC 1860 295-A
8 ARMS ACT, 1959 25

3. (a) Occurrence of offence

\”šȡ’€ȧƒŠ“ȡ

1 Day
Ǒ‘“Monday Date from
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ ȯ Date To
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€€
 

Time Period
 ˜™\ͬ’Pahar 5 Time From
 ˜™ ȯ Time To
 ˜™€
hrs hrs

(b) Information received at P.S.

ȡ“ȡ‡¡ȡȲ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ Time
 ˜™
 Ǘ…“ȡĤȡ܏¡Ǖ_  hrs
(c) General Diary Reference Entry No.
Ĥͪǔ犠Ȳ Time
 ˜™

šȪ‡“ȡ˜…ȡ Ȳ‘—[
 
hrs

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 12:14:45 1/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

4. Type of Information
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡĤ€ȡšWritten
5. Place of Occurrence

ƒŠ“ȡ萛

1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S.

ȡ“ȡ ȯ‘ǗšȣkšǑ‘žȡEAST, 1.5 Km(s) Beat No.
–ȢŠ Ȳ

(b) Address
”ȡNUH ADBAR CHOWK,

(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of P.S.
™Ǒ‘ȡ“ȡ Ȣ˜ȡ€ȯ–ȡ¡š¡ȰȪȡ“ȡ
€ȡ“ȡ˜

District (State)
ǔ‡›ȡ
šȡϙ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 12:14:45 2/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

6. Complainant / Informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[
(a) Name
“ȡ˜Ǔ“šȣ¢€”Ȳ€‡€Ǖ˜ȡš
(b) Father's/Husband's Name
ͪ”ȡ”Ǔ€ȡ“ȡ˜
(c) Date/Year of Birth
‡Û˜ǓͬŸ[ (d) Nationality
šȡçĚȣ™ȡINDIA

(e) UID No.
™Ǘ]_ŒȢ Ȳ
(f) Passport No.
”ȡ ”ȪŠ[ Ȳ

Date of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȧǓͬ Place of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȡèȡ“

(g) Occupation
噝 ȡ™
(h) Address

”ȡ
S.No. Address Type
”ȡ€ȡ Address
”ȡ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš
1 Present Address \”šȡ’žȡȡ ȰȊšGGM, GURUGRAM,
HARYANA, INDIA
2 Permanent Address \”šȡ’žȡȡ ȰȊšGGM, GURUGRAM,
HARYANA, INDIA
(i) Phone number
‘Ǘš—ȡŸ Ȳ Mobile
˜Ȫ–ȡ^› Ȳ

7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars

£ȡ ȲǑ‘Ê’\£ȡ
\ͧ—™Ǖȏ€ȡ”ǗšȯͪšŽ Ǒ¡Ž[“

S. No. Name
“ȡ˜ Alias
`”“ȡ˜ Relative's Name
ǐšæȯ‘ȡš€ȡ“ȡ˜

Đ Ȳ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 12:14:46 3/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant

ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[ɮȡšȡ
ǐš”ȪŠ[‘ȯšȣ ȯ‘‡[€šȡ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ

9. Particulars of properties of interest

 Ȳ–ǔے à”ǔ׏€ȡ
ͪšŽ
S. No. Property Type
 à”ǔ׏€ȯSub Type
`”Ĥ€ȡš Value(In Rs/-)
˜Ǘã™
ǽ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš ˜Ʌ

10. Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-)

…Ȫšȣ¡Ǖ_ à”ǔ׏€ȡ€Ǖ›˜Ǘã™
ǽ˜Ʌ

11. Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any

˜ǙיǕ ˜Ȣ¢ȡǐš”ȪŠ[™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ™Ǒ‘€Ȫ_¡Ȫ

S. No. UIDB Number

™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ

Đ Ȳ

12. First Information contents

Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡØ™

 ȯȡ˜ȯSHO  ¡ȡ–ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǖ¡ĮȢ˜ȡ“‡ȢǓ“ȯ‘“¡Ȱͩ€˜ȰǓ“šȣ¢€”Ȳ€‡€Ǖ˜ȡšĤ—ȡšȣ
\”šȡ’žȡȡ ȰȊš39‚ǕǽĒȡ˜Ȱ“ȡ¡Ǖȱ@‡Ȫ]‡˜Ȱ\”“ȯ ȡȢ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“Easi ]‘ȯž“0 905
GGM,Ehc ”Ȫ€ššȡ˜1077 GGM, ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ Û‘ȣ”1956 GGM, ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ Ȳ‡™2051 GGM, ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ
ͪĐ˜4243 GGM, ‚ȡŒȢ š€ȡšȣ“0 HR26GV1482…ȡ›€ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ‚ȪšȣžȲ€š“0 4252GGM €ȯ ȡ
`ͅ\ͬ’€ȡǐš™Ȫ€ȯ]‘ȯžȪ€ȯ\“Ǖ ȡšǔ‡›ȡ“Ǖ¡˜ȯ–šȡ™ȯ€ȡ“Ǘ“噝èȡŒ™ǗŠȣ€ȯͧ›f]™ȯȯ‡Ȫ
˜ȯšȣŒ™ǗŠȣ\Œ–š…ȫ€“Ǖ¡”š ȡȢ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“€ȯ ȡ›‚ȡ_‚_@‡Ȫ¡ȡ”š˜ȯšȯ ȡȢǓ“šȣ¢€
\Ǔ“›€Ǖ˜ȡšĤ—ȡšȣ\”šȡ’žȡȡ ȰȊš40‚ǕǽĒȡ˜—Ȣ\”“ȯ ȡȢ€˜[…ȡšȣ™Ȫ€ȯ ȡ` Ȣèȡ“
\Œ–š…ȫ€˜ȯšȯ ȡȰ“ȡȯ@‡ȪȡŒǗ€ȧš• ȯ€šȣ–600/700`Ē\ ȡ˜ȡǔ‡€›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȧ
—ȢŒ‡Ȫ€ȧ\ã¡ȡ¡Ǖ\€–š€ȯ“ȡšȯ›‚ȡš¡ȯȯȡ…ȫ€”šȰ“ȡ”Ǖͧ› –›€ȧš•”šȡ€š
š¡ȯȯ@‡Ȫ600/700`Ē\ ȡ˜ȡǔ‡€›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȧ—ȢŒɮȡšȡ›‚ȡȡš”Ǖͧ› –›”š”šȡͩ€™ȡ‡ȡ
š¡ȡȡȡ^ €ȯ\›ȡȡ`”šȪȏ\ ȡ˜ȡǔ‡€›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȧ—ȢŒ€ȧš• ȯ”Ǖͧ› –›”š\Ȱ’

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 12:14:46 4/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

¡ͬ™ȡšȪ ȯ•ȡ™š—Ȣͩ€™ȡ‡ȡ“ȯ›‚ȡ@‡Ȫ˜Ȱ“ȯȡǓ“šȣ¢€\Ǔ“›€Ǖ˜ȡš“ȯ\”“ȯ ȡȢ€˜[…ȡšȣ™Ȫ
€ȧ_˜‘ȡ‘ ȯ`“›Ȫ‚Ȫ€Ȫ˜ȡ_€€ȯ˜ȡڙ˜ ȯ€ȡ•ȧ–ȡš–ȡš ˜ˆȡ“ȯ€ȧ€Ȫͧžž€ȧ]”€ȡ“Ǘ“
€Ȫ\”“ȯ¡ȡ˜ȯ“ȡ›ȯȡžȡǔۏ噝èȡ–“ȡ™ȯšȯȡͩ€ͩ€ Ȣå™ͩ€€ȡ‡ȡ“˜ȡ›€ȡ
“Ǖ€ ȡ““ȡ¡Ȫ”šÛǕ`Ē\ ȡ˜ȡǔ‡€›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȧ—Ȣ„ɮȡšȡ”Ǖͧ› –›”š”šȡȡ•ȡ™ǐš‚
Ǔ“šÛš‡ȡšȣšȡ‡Ȫ` Ȣ‘ȫšȡ“`Ē\ ȡ˜ȡǔ‡€›Ȫ‚Ȫɮȡšȡ€ȧ‚_•ȡ™ǐš‚˜ȯ ȯf€‚Ȫ›ȣ
Ǔ“šȣ¢€\Ǔ“›€Ǖ˜ȡš€ȯ”ȯŠ˜ȯ›‚Ȣǔ‡  ȯȪƒŠ“ȡ萛”šƒȡ™›¡Ȫ‚™ȡȡ^ ‚Ȫ›ȣ–ȡšȣ
ȡ”אš–ȡ‡Ȣ˜ȯASI ‡‚–Ȣš\”šȡ’žȡȡ ȰȊš40‚ǕǽĒȡ˜—Ȣ‡É˜Ȣ¡Ȫ‚™ȡ@ǔ‡ €Ȫ ȡȢ
€˜[…ȡšȣSI  Ȳ‡™2051 GGM ȡ\ۙ ȡȢ™Ȫ€ȧ_˜‘ȡ‘ ȯĤȡͧ˜€_›ȡ‡€ȯͧ›f¡è”ȡ›€ȡ
šȡ“ȡͩ€™ȡ‚™ȡ@‡Ȫ˜Ȱ“ȯȡ ȡȢ€˜[…ȡšȣ™Ȫ“ȯ\”“ȯ\”“ȯ š€ȡšȣͪ”芛ȪAK47 ȯ—ȢŒ”š
€ȡ–Ǘ”ȡ“ȯ€ȯͧ›fȡ\”“Ȣȡ\”“ȯ ȡȢ€˜[…ȡšȣ‚Ž€ȧ Ǖš¢ȡ€ȯͧ›f¡ȡ_•ȡ™š—Ȣͩ€f‡Ȫ
` 600/700`Ē\ ȡ˜ȡǔ‡€›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȧ—ȢŒ“ȯ š€ȡšȣ€ȡ™[˜ȯ–ȡ’ȡŒȡ›€šȡ”Ǖͧ› –›”š‡ȡ“
 ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧǓ“™ ȯ”šȡȡ•ȡ™ǐš‚€š€ȯf€ Ȫ…Ȣ ˜ˆȢ ȡǔ‡ž€ȯ¡^ ƒŠ“ȡ€Ȫ
\Ȳ‡ȡ˜Ǒ‘™ȡ¡Ȱ@‡Ȫ”Ǖͧ› –›”š”אš–ȡ‡Ȣȡ•ȡ™ǐš‚€š“ȯȡ›ȯ€Ǖ†›Ȫ‚Ȫ€Ȫ˜Ȱ\”“ȯ ȡ˜“ȯ
]“ȯ”š”¡…ȡ“€š €ȡ¡Ǖȱ@‡Ȫ`“600/700`Ē\ ȡ˜ȡǔ‡€›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȧ—ȢŒ“ȯ š€ȡšȣ€ȡ™[˜ȯ
–ȡ’ȡŒȡ›€šȡ”Ǖͧ› –›”š‡ȡ“ ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧǓ“™ ȯ”šȡȡ•ȡ™ǐš‚€š€ȯ”Ǖͧ› –›€Ȫ
…ȪŠ˜ȡš€šf€‚à—Ȣš\”šȡ’ͩ€™ȡ¡Ȱ@‡Ȫ`”šȪȏ600/700\ ȡ˜ȡǔ‡€›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȯͨ›ȡ• É
 ȯ É€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ€ȧ‡ȡȯ@SD ĤȡȸǓ“šȣ¢€”Ȳ€‡€Ǖ˜ȡšĤ—ȡšȣ\”šȡ’žȡȡ ȰȊš39‚ǕǽĒȡ˜
DT 01.08.23\‡ȡ“ȡ^  ˜™f€ͧ›ͨ‘šȡ菘Ǖ‘_Ǔ“šȣ¢€”Ȳ€‡€Ǖ˜ȡšĤ—ȡšȣ\”šȡ’
žȡȡ ȰȊš39‚ǕǾĒȡ˜–šͨ›ȡ•600/700å™ǔȏ“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜ȡ¡‘š€ȡ\Œ–š…ȫ€“Ǘȱ¡
–ȡ–]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“600/700å™ǔȏ™Ȫɮȡšȡ\›ȡ¡¡Ǘ\€–š€ȯ“ȡšȯ›‚ȡȯ¡Ǖf_Š”אš›ȡ‹Ȥ
ŒȲŒȡ\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš ȯ•ȡ™ǐšȲ‚€š€ȯ”Ǖͧ› –›”š¡˜›ȡ€š“ȯ”šǓ“šȣ¢€\Ǔ“›€Ǖ˜ȡš€Ȫ
‚Ȫ›ȣ˜ȡš“ȯȡ\ۙ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“€Ȫ…ȪŠ”¡Ǖ…ȡ“ȯ–ȡšȯ–ȡ‡Ǖ˜[‡Ȱš’ȡšȡ148,149,332, 353,186,307
,295A IPC 25-54-59 A ACT –ȡšȯ‘šȡ菐ȡ“ȡ”šĤȡ܏¡Ȫ“ȯ”š€ȡ™˜Ȣ˜Ǖ€‘˜ȡ“252Ǒ‘“ȡ€
01.08.2023’ȡšȡ148,149,332, 353,186,307 ,295A IPC 25-54-59 A ACT ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡‘‡[šǔ‡0
ͩ€™ȡ‡ȡ€šFIR ͩ€Ĥ‚ȡȲšĤǓ™ȡ€àܙǗŠšɮȡšȡȰ™ȡš€š€ȯè”Ȱž›ǐš”ȪŠ[è”Ȱž›SPO \¡š€ȡš
184ɮȡšȡ_›ȡ€ȡ˜ǔ‡èĚȯŠ ȡ¡–“Ǘȱ¡ȡ`ͅ\ͬ’€ȡǐš™Ȫͩ€ ȯȡ˜ȯ—ȯ‡Ȣ‡ȡš¡ȣ¡Ȱ@
I/O D/O – PSI AJAY KUMAR

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 12:14:46 5/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.

€ȧ‚™Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ…ǗȲͩ€`”šȪȏ‡ȡ“€ȡšȣ ȯ”ȡ…›ȡ¡Ȱͩ€\”šȡ’€š“ȯ€ȡšȣ€ȡ
˜‘ Ȳ˜Ʌ`ã›ȯ’ȡšȡ€ȯ¡¡Ȱ
(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation
Ĥ€šŽ‘‡[ͩ€™ȡ‚™ȡkš‡ȡȲ…€ȯ
Rank
”‘SI (Sub-Inspector)
ͧ›fͧ›™ȡ‚™ȡor ( ™ȡ
(2) Directed (Name of I.O.)
‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ“ȡ˜
AJAY KUMAR

No.
 ȲPSI to take up the Investigation
€Ȫ‡ȡȲ…\”“ȯ”ȡ ˜Ʌ›ȯ“ȯ€ȯͧ›f
Ǔ“‘ȶžǑ‘™ȡ‚™ȡor
™ȡ

Directed (Mobile No. of I.O.)

‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ˜Ȫ–ȡ^›“Ȳ–š

(3) Refused investigation due to

‡ȡȲ…€ȯͧ›for
€ȯ€ȡšŽ^Ȳ€ȡšͩ€™ȡ
District
ǔ«›ȡ
™ȡ
(4) Transferred to P.S.
ȡ“ȡ

on point of jurisdiction
€Ȫ¢ȯğȡͬ’€ȡš€ȯ
€ȡšŽ¡èȡȲǐš

F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded

and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost.
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȪĤȡͧ˜€ȧ”±€š Ǖ“ȡ_‚™Ȣ ¡ȣ‘‡[¡Ǖ_˜ȡ“ȡkšf€€Ȩ”ȢǓ“žǕã€
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[€Ȫ‘ȣ‚™Ȣ

R.O.A.C.
]šjf Ȣ

14. Signature of Officer in charge, Police

Station
ȡ“ȡĤ—ȡšȣ€ȯ¡èȡ¢š

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 12:14:46 6/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

Signature / Thumb Name

“ȡ˜Ombir
impression
of the complainant / Rank
”‘I (Inspector)
informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȯ¡èȡ¢š\Ȳ‚Ǘ‹ȯ No.
 Ȳ

€ȡǓ“žȡ“

15. Date and time of dispatch to the court

\‘ȡ›˜ɅĤȯŸŽ€ȧǑ‘“ȡȲ€

kš ˜™

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 12:14:46 7/7
 Annexure 2
HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

1. District
ǔ«›ȡNUH P.S.
ȡ“ȡCITY NUH Year
Ÿ[

FIR No.
Ĥ Ǘǐš Ȳ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€


2. S.No. Acts
\ͬ’Ǔ“™˜ Sections
’ȡšȡ
fȱ

Đ Ȳ
1 IPC 1860 148
2 IPC 1860 149
3 IPC 1860 332
4 IPC 1860 353
5 IPC 1860 186
6 IPC 1860 427
7 IPC 1860 435
8 IPC 1860 436
9 IPC 1860 395
10 IPC 1860 397
11 ARMS ACT, 1959 25

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:44:44 1/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

3. (a) Occurrence of offence

\”šȡ’€ȧƒŠ“ȡ

1 Day
Ǒ‘“Monday Date from
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ ȯ Date To
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€€
 

Time Period
 ˜™\ͬ’Pahar 6 Time From
 ˜™ ȯ Time To
 ˜™€
hrs hrs

(b) Information received at P.S.

ȡ“ȡ‡¡ȡȲ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ Time
 ˜™
 Ǘ…“ȡĤȡ܏¡Ǖ_  hrs
(c) General Diary Reference Entry No.
Ĥͪǔ犠Ȳ Time
 ˜™

šȪ‡“ȡ˜…ȡ Ȳ‘—[
 
hrs

4. Type of Information
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡĤ€ȡšWritten
5. Place of Occurrence

ƒŠ“ȡ萛

1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S.

ȡ“ȡ ȯ‘ǗšȣkšǑ‘žȡNORTH-EAST, 2 Beat No.
–ȢŠ Ȳ
Km(s)
(b) Address
”ȡCYBER THANA NUH,

(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of P.S.
™Ǒ‘ȡ“ȡ Ȣ˜ȡ€ȯ–ȡ¡š¡ȰȪȡ“ȡ
€ȡ“ȡ˜

District (State)
ǔ‡›ȡ
šȡϙ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:44:44 2/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

6. Complainant / Informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[
(a) Name
“ȡ˜”Ȣf ]_ Ǘš‡
(b) Father's/Husband's Name
ͪ”ȡ”Ǔ€ȡ“ȡ˜
(c) Date/Year of Birth
‡Û˜ǓͬŸ[ (d) Nationality
šȡçĚȣ™ȡINDIA

(e) UID No.
™Ǘ]_ŒȢ Ȳ
(f) Passport No.
”ȡ ”ȪŠ[ Ȳ

Date of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȧǓͬ Place of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȡèȡ“

(g) Occupation
噝 ȡ™
(h) Address

”ȡ
S.No. Address Type
”ȡ€ȡ Address
”ȡ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš
1 Present Address ȡ“ȡžȡ^–šĐȡ^˜“Ǘ¡ȲCITY NUH, NUH,
HARYANA, INDIA
2 Permanent Address ȡ“ȡžȡ^–šĐȡ^˜“Ǘ¡ȲCITY NUH, NUH,
HARYANA, INDIA
(i) Phone number
‘Ǘš—ȡŸ Ȳ Mobile
˜Ȫ–ȡ^› Ȳ

7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars

£ȡ ȲǑ‘Ê’\£ȡ
\ͧ—™Ǖȏ€ȡ”ǗšȯͪšŽ Ǒ¡Ž[“

S. No. Name
“ȡ˜ Alias
`”“ȡ˜ Relative's Name
ǐšæȯ‘ȡš€ȡ“ȡ˜

Đ Ȳ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:44:44 3/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant

ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[ɮȡšȡ
ǐš”ȪŠ[‘ȯšȣ ȯ‘‡[€šȡ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ

9. Particulars of properties of interest

 Ȳ–ǔے à”ǔ׏€ȡ
ͪšŽ
S. No. Property Type
 à”ǔ׏€ȯSub Type
`”Ĥ€ȡš Value(In Rs/-)
˜Ǘã™
ǽ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš ˜Ʌ

10. Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-)

…Ȫšȣ¡Ǖ_ à”ǔ׏€ȡ€Ǖ›˜Ǘã™
ǽ˜Ʌ

11. Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any

˜ǙיǕ ˜Ȣ¢ȡǐš”ȪŠ[™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ™Ǒ‘€Ȫ_¡Ȫ

S. No. UIDB Number

™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ

Đ Ȳ

12. First Information contents

Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡØ™

 ȯȡ˜ɅĤ–Û’€\• šȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡ͪŸ™– ‘šȡ菖ȡ–€š“ȯ€ȡ“Ǘ“Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ–šͨ›ȡ•
\£ȡ`”ġͪ™Ȫ‘‚ȡ_™ɉ–ȡšȯĮȢ˜ȡ“‡ȢǓ“ȯ‘“¡Ȱͩ€Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€31.07.2023€Ȫ ˜™€šȣ–03.30
”Ȣf˜”š˜“”Ȣf ]_˜™”Ȣf ]_ Ǖ’ȢšĤ’ȡ“ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ’˜ȶÛġ20“Ǘȱ¡ȡ“ȡ ȡ_–šĐȡ_˜“Ǘȱ¡
ff ]_ Ǖšȯž116“Ǘȱ¡˜™Ĥ’ȡ“ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ ǕšȯÛġ08“Ǘȱ¡ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ‚Ǖ›ž“536“Ǘȱ¡ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣšƒǕ–Ȣš
ͧ Ȳ¡291“Ǘȱ¡ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣšͪ€ȡۏ731“Ǘȱ¡ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣžǕ—˜279“Ǘȱ¡ ȡ_–š Ȱ›“Ǘȱ¡¡ȡǔ‡šȡ“ȡȡͩ€
˜ȯȡ’ȡͧ˜[€‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȡ€ȯ‘ȫšȡ“`Ē¡Ǖ_¡‡ȡšɉ€ȧ É™ȡȱ˜Ʌ]ИŽ€ȡšȣ—ȢŒ“ȯ¡˜æšȡ
¡Ȫ€š\…ȡ“€ȡ“ȡ ȡ_–šĐȡ_˜“Ǘȱ¡€Ȫ…ȡšɉš• ȯƒȯšȡ€šͧ›™ȡȡͬ‚Œ”אšɉ ȯȡ“ȡ
”š”šȡžǕǽ€šǑ‘™ȡȡ‡Ȫš2 ȯ]ȡ‡›‚ȡš¡ȯȯͩ€^“ ȡ›ɉ€Ȫǔ‡Û‘ȡ‡›ȡ‘Ȫ@‡Ȫ
` Ȣ‘ȫšȡ“f€ š€ȡšȣ–Ȫ›ȯšȪ‚ȡ°Ȣ“à–šHR-27-GV-5361˜Ʌ–Ȱ‹ȯf ]_Ǒ‘ǔʝ‡™ȡ“ȡ ‘š
ȡŒǕ ȡȢ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“‘ȫŒȯ¡Ǖg\”“Ȣ‡ȡ“–…ȡȯ¡Ǖg ȡ_–šĐȡ_˜ȡ“ȡ“ǗȲ¡€ȯ\ۑš]‚™ȯ
‡Ȫ`”ġͪ™ɉ‘Ȳ‚ȡ_™ɉ“ȯȡ“ȡ”š…ȡšɉš• ȯ”אšȡͬ‚Œ”אš•Ʉ€“ȡ‡ȡšȣšȡ@‘‚ȡ_™ɉ“ȯ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:44:44 4/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

– “à–šDL-1PD-5863ǔ‡ €ȡšȲ‚”Ȣ›ȡ ȯŠÈ€š˜ȡš€š ȡ_–šȡ“ȡ“ǗȲ¡€ȧ‘ȣȡšɉ˜ȯ“
‚ȯŠ€ȪȪ°Ǒ‘™ȡ@‡Ȫ` Ȣ‘ȫšȡ“—ȢŒ˜Ʌ ȯ€Ǖ†`”ġ€ȡǐš™ɉ‘‚ȡ_™ɉ“ȯȡ“ȡ€ȧ‘ȣȡš†ɉ”š
…€š\”“ȯ”ȡ šȯ\Ȱ’\ ›ȡ ȯ‡ȡ“ ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧǓ“™ ȯ”Ǖͧ› èŠȡ•”š Ȣ’ȯ•ȡ™š
ͩ€™ȯǔ‡ ”š˜ɇ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ““ȯ\ۑšƒǕ €š‘ȣȡš€ȧ]Œ›ȯ€š\”“Ȣ‡ȡ“–…ȡ_‡Ȫ˜ȯšȯ
]‘ȯž”š`Ē—ȢŒ€Ȫ—‚ȡ“ȯ€ȯͧ›gͧ ”ȡ¡ȣĤ‘ȣ”€Ǖ˜ȡš445“ǗȲ¡“ȯ\”“ȢǑŠ™š‚Ȱ ‚“ ȯ
`”ġͪ™ɉ‘Ȳ‚ȡ_™ɉ€ȪšȪ€“ȯ€ȯͧ›™ȯ] Ǘ‚Ȱ €ȯ‚Ȫ›ȯ…›ȡ™ȯ‡Ȫ` €ȯ”æ…ȡ—Ȣ`”ġͪ™Ȫ‘‚ȡ_™Ȫ
“ȯ”šȡ]‚‡“Ȣ‡ȡšȣšȢǔ‡ ”š˜Ȱ“ȯ ȡȢ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“ɉ“ȯ\”“ȯ]טš¢ȡ‡ȡ“˜ȡ›
€ȧ Ǖš¢ȡ€Ȫ˜Ƨȯ‘“‡ššȯ¡Ǖgȡ“ȡ€Ȫ˜Ʌšȯ¡Ǖg š€ȡšȣ\ ›ȡ›ȯ€š‡ȡ–Ȣ¡ȡ_•ȡ™š
ͩ€™ȯ@‡Ȫ˜ɇ“ȯ\”“Ȣ š€ȡšȣͪ”èȫ› ȯ€Ǖ›20šȡ`ȲŒ•ȡ™šͩ€™ȯǔ‡ ˜Ʌ ȯ10šȡ`ȲŒ˜ȯšȯȡ10
šȡ`ȲŒff ]_ ‡Ȳ™€ȧ š€ȡšȣͪ”èȫ›€ȯȯ”Ȣf ]_ Ǖ’Ȣš“ȯ\”“Ȣ š€ȡšȣͪ”èȫ› ȯ€Ǖ›
20šȡ`ȲŒ•ȡ™šͩ€™ȯǔ‡ ˜Ʌ ȯ10šȡ`ȲŒ”Ȣf ]_ Ǖ’Ȣšȡ10šȡ`ȲŒ”Ȣf ]_—‡“›ȡ›€ȯ
 š€ȡšȣͪ”èȫ›€ȯȯȡff ]_ Ǖšȯž“ȯff ]_šȡ€ȯž€ȧǐšȡ㝚 ȯ€Ǖ›10šȡ`ȲŒ•ȡ™š
ͩ€™ȯĤ’ȡ“ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ ǕšȯÛġ“ȯSLR  ȯ€Ǖ›25šȡ`ȲŒ•ȡ™šͩ€™ȯͧ ”ȡ¡ȣšƒǕȢš“ȯSLR €ȯ€Ǖ›25
šȡ`ȲŒ•ȡ™šͩ€™ȯȡͧ ”ȡ¡ȣžǕ—˜“ȯCARBINE €ȯ€Ǖ›15šȡ`ȲŒ•ȡ™šͩ€™ȯ@f ]_Ǒ‘ǔʝ‡™
ȡ“ȡ ‘šȡŒǕ“ȯ—Ȣ\”“Ȣǐšȡ㝚 ȯ¡ȡ_•ȡ™šͩ€™ȯ@‡Ȫ^ Ȣ‘ȫšȡ“`”ġͪ™ɉ‘Ȳ‚ȡ_™ɉ“ȯ
ȡ“ȡ€ȯ˜ȯ“‚ȯŠ€ȯ–ȡ¡šŒȢȡ“ȡ ‘šȡŒǗ€ȧ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ–Ȫ›ȯšȪ“0. HR-27-GV-5361
˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“€ȯĤȡ_ȯŠȡ¡“ ȲəȡHR-05-AW-0010ĐȯŠȡ–ȡšȲ‚ •ȯ‘HR-87D-8157–Ȱ›ȯ“Ȫ–ȡšȲ‚
“Ȣ›ȡHR-50F-2704ǔȝŒ–ȡšȲ‚ •ȯ‘˜Ʌ”ȰĚȪ›Ǔ†Œ€€š]‚›‚ȡ‘ȣȡȡ“ȡ€ȧ‘ȣȡšɉ
†ɉ”š…€š\ۑšƒǕ €š˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“€ȯ\ۑšŒȯĤȡ_ȯŠȡ¡“ɉ€Ȫͬ‚Œ”אšɉ›ȡ‹ȤŒÖŒɉ
 ȯȡ¡“ ȲəȡHR-36AM-9783ͩ€]–ȡšȲ‚ •ȯ‘HR-96-2076\ãŠȪ€ȯ10–ȡšȲ‚ •ȯ‘
HR-35E-8233\ãŠȪLXI –ȡšȲ‚“Ȣ›ȡHR-29AJ-9678Ȱ‚“ȡš–ȡšȲ‚è›ȯŠȣHR-50D-0709ǔèÝŠ
–ȡšȲ‚ •ȯ‘HR-50D-3368ǔèÝŠ–ȡšȲ‚ĒȯHR-51AN-6229ǔèÝŠ–ȡšȲ‚“Ȣ›ȡHR-35T-0681
ȰۙǕ–ȡšȲ‚ •ȯ‘HR-26EM-6557Ħȯ‡ȡ–ȡšȲ‚ •ȯ‘HR-52E-1209ŠȡŠȡ–ȡšȲ‚ •ȯ‘€ȯ ȡ
ȪŒ•ȪŒ€ȧȡ˜ȪŠš ȡ_ͩ€›HR-30C-7880ܛ š–ȡšȲ‚€ȡ›ȡ”š”ȰĚȪ›Ǔ†Œ€€š]‚›‚ȡ‘ȣ@
ȡȡ“ȡ€ȯ€˜šȪ˜Ʌšȯ¡Ǖg02 š€ȡšȣܛȡǔ芀€Ǖ›š01_۝Š[š01–ȰĚȣ01›Ȱ”Šȡ”
ff ]_ Ǖšȯž€ȡ” [ǔ‡ ˜Ʌ]’ȡš€ȡŒ[€šȣ–5¡‡ȡšǽ”™ȯ\ۙ‡ǽšȣ€ȡ‚‡ȡȯ€Ȫ
›ǕŠ€š›ȯ‚gȡ˜ȯ €ȧ‘ȣȡšȡ“ȡ€ȧ†–ȡǽ˜”ššȢ”ȡ“Ȣ€ȧŠȲͩ€™ɉ€ȪȪŒǑ‘™ȡ@

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:44:44 5/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

` €ȯ–ȡ‘€ȡ•ȧ”Ǖͧ› •Ȫ []‚_kš`”ġȢ‘Ȳ‚ȡ_¡‡ȡšɉ€ȧ Ȳəȡ˜Ʌ”אšȡ€šȯ¡Ǖf`ȏ
– €Ȫ†ȪŒ€š‡ȡ“ ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧ’˜€ȧ‘ȯȯ¡Ǖg¡ȡȱ ȯ—ȡ‚‚™ȯ@‡Ȫ`”ġͪ™Ȫ‘‚ȡ_™Ȫ“ȯ
˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“€Ȫ‡ȡ“ ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧǓ“™ ȯȡ“ȡ”š…€š”šȡͩ€™ȡ]‚‡“Ȣ€ȧȡ
 š€ȡš€ȡ™[˜Ʌ–ȡ’ȡ”¡Ǖȱ…ȡ_ȡĤ’ȡ“ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ ǕšȯÛġͧ ”ȡ¡ȣžǕ—˜€ȯ…ȪŠȯ›‚Ȣ‡Ȫ€››ȡ
fŒ]Œ[šǔ萏Ȣ¡Ȫ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽMLR “¡ȣ€Šȡ_‚_‡Ȫ\”“Ȣ…ȪŠȪ€ȯ–ȡšȯ˜ɅǕ‘–™ȡ“‘ȯ‚ȯ@‡Ȫ
¡ȡ›‚Ȳ—Ȣš¡Ȫ“ȯ›ȡfŒ]Œ[šǔ萏Ȣšȡ–¡Ȫ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ‘šȡ菠˜™”š“¡ȣ‘ȣ‡ȡ €ȧ@
ƒŠ“ȡ€ȯ‘ȫšȡ“ȯ`”ġͪ™ɉ€ȧ]‚‡“Ȣ”šȡ€šȯ¡Ǖg–“ȡ_‚_ͪͫŒ™Ȫ•ȪŠȪ˜ɇ]”€Ȫ
\›‚ ȯ”Ȱ“Ĝȡ_˜ɅŒȡ›€š‘ȯš¡ȡ¡Ǘȱ@‡Ȫ\£ȡ`”ġͪ™ɉ‘Ȳ‚ȡ^™ɉ€ȯͨ›ȡ• É ȯ É
€ȡ“Ǘ“Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ€ȧ‡ȡg@SD- Ĥȡȸ”Ȣf ]_ Ǘš‡ȡ“ȡžȡ^–šĐȡ^˜“Ǘ¡Ȳ01.08.23\‡
ȡ“ȡ^  ˜™f€ͧ›ͨ‘šȡèPSI  Ǘš‡ȡ“ȡ ȡ_–šĐȡ_˜“Ǘȱ¡–šͨ›ȡ•“ȡ˜”ȡ
“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜¡‡ȡšȪå™ǔȏȡ¡‘š€ȡ ȡ_–šȡ“ȡ“Ǘȱ¡–ȡ–`”šȪȏ]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“ɮȡšȡ¡˜˜žšȡ
¡Ȫ€šȡ“ȡ€ȯƒȯšȡ€š€ȯȡ“ȡ€ȯ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“Ȫ€Ȫ˜ȡš“ȯͩ€Ǔ“™ ȯ_Š”אš›ȡ‹ȤŒȲŒȡ
\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš ȯ•ȡ™ǐšȲ‚€š€ȯ”Ǖͧ› –›”š¡˜›ȡ€š€ȯ…ȪŠ”¡Ǖ…ȡ“ȯȡȡ“ȡ¡‡ȡ˜ȯȪŒ•ȪŒ
€š“ȯȡ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ™Ȫȡ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“Ȫͩ€Ĥȡ_ȯŠ‚ȡŒȢ™Ȫ€ȪȪŒ•ȪŒ€š€ȯ]‚›‚ȡ“ȯ–ȡšȯ–ȡ
‡Ǖ˜[‡Ȱš’ȡšȡ148,149,332, 353,186,427,435,436,395, 397 IPC 25-54-59 A ACT ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡–ȡšȯ
‘šȡ菐ȡ“ȡ”šĤȡ܏¡Ȫ“ȯ”š€ȡ™˜Ȣ˜Ǖ€‘˜ȡ“253Ǒ‘“ȡ€01.08.2023’ȡšȡ148,149,332,
353,186,427,435,436,395, 397 IPC 25-54-59 A ACT ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡‘‡[šǔ‡0ͩ€™ȡ
‡ȡ€šFIR ͩ€Ĥ‚ȡȲšĤǓ™ȡ€àܙǗŠšɮȡšȡȰ™ȡš€š€ȯè”Ȱž›ǐš”ȪŠ[è”Ȱž›ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ Ǖ–ȡ“ȡ“
817“Ǘȱ¡ɮȡšȡ_›ȡ€ȡ˜ǔ‡èĚȯŠ ȡ¡–“Ǘȱ¡ȡ`ͅ\ͬ’€ȡǐš™Ȫͩ€ ȯȡ˜ȯ—ȯ‡Ȣ‡ȡš¡ȣ¡Ȱ@
I/O D/O – P/SI SANJEET

13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.

€ȧ‚™Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ…ǗȲͩ€`”šȪȏ‡ȡ“€ȡšȣ ȯ”ȡ…›ȡ¡Ȱͩ€\”šȡ’€š“ȯ€ȡšȣ€ȡ
˜‘ Ȳ˜Ʌ`ã›ȯ’ȡšȡ€ȯ¡¡Ȱ
(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation
Ĥ€šŽ‘‡[ͩ€™ȡ‚™ȡkš‡ȡȲ…€ȯ
Rank
”‘SI (Sub-Inspector)
ͧ›fͧ›™ȡ‚™ȡor ( ™ȡ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:44:44 6/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

(2) Directed (Name of I.O.)

‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ“ȡ˜
SANJEET

No.
 ȲPSI to take up the Investigation
€Ȫ‡ȡȲ…\”“ȯ”ȡ ˜Ʌ›ȯ“ȯ€ȯͧ›f
Ǔ“‘ȶžǑ‘™ȡ‚™ȡor
™ȡ

Directed (Mobile No. of I.O.)

‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ˜Ȫ–ȡ^›“Ȳ–š

(3) Refused investigation due to

‡ȡȲ…€ȯͧ›for
€ȯ€ȡšŽ^Ȳ€ȡšͩ€™ȡ
District
ǔ«›ȡ
™ȡ
(4) Transferred to P.S.
ȡ“ȡ

on point of jurisdiction
€Ȫ¢ȯğȡͬ’€ȡš€ȯ
€ȡšŽ¡èȡȲǐš
F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded
and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost.
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȪĤȡͧ˜€ȧ”±€š Ǖ“ȡ_‚™Ȣ ¡ȣ‘‡[¡Ǖ_˜ȡ“ȡkšf€€Ȩ”ȢǓ“žǕã€
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[€Ȫ‘ȣ‚™Ȣ

R.O.A.C.
]šjf Ȣ

14. Signature / Thumb Signature of Officer in charge, Police

impression Station
ȡ“ȡĤ—ȡšȣ€ȯ¡èȡ¢š
of the complainant /
informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Name
“ȡ˜Ombir
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȯ¡èȡ¢š\Ȳ‚Ǘ‹ȯ Rank
”‘I (Inspector)
€ȡǓ“žȡ“
No.
 Ȳ

15. Date and time of dispatch to the court

\‘ȡ›˜ɅĤȯŸŽ€ȧǑ‘“ȡȲ€

kš ˜™

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:44:44 7/7
 Annexure 3
HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

1. District
ǔ«›ȡNUH P.S.
ȡ“ȡCITY NUH Year
Ÿ[

FIR No.
Ĥ Ǘǐš Ȳ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€


2. S.No. Acts
\ͬ’Ǔ“™˜ Sections
’ȡšȡ
fȱ

Đ Ȳ
1 IPC 1860 148
2 IPC 1860 149
3 IPC 1860 332
4 IPC 1860 353
5 IPC 1860 186
6 IPC 1860 307
7 IPC 1860 435
8 ARMS ACT, 1959 25

3. (a) Occurrence of offence

\”šȡ’€ȧƒŠ“ȡ

1 Day
Ǒ‘“Monday Date from
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ ȯ Date To
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€€
 

Time Period
 ˜™\ͬ’Pahar 5 Time From
 ˜™ ȯ Time To
 ˜™€
hrs hrs

(b) Information received at P.S.

ȡ“ȡ‡¡ȡȲ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ Time
 ˜™
 Ǘ…“ȡĤȡ܏¡Ǖ_  hrs
(c) General Diary Reference Entry No.
Ĥͪǔ犠Ȳ Time
 ˜™

šȪ‡“ȡ˜…ȡ Ȳ‘—[
 
hrs

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:12 1/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

4. Type of Information
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡĤ€ȡšWritten
5. Place of Occurrence

ƒŠ“ȡ萛

1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S.

ȡ“ȡ ȯ‘ǗšȣkšǑ‘žȡSOUTH-EAST, 1 Beat No.
–ȢŠ Ȳ
Km(s)
(b) Address
”ȡcity nuh,

(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of P.S.
™Ǒ‘ȡ“ȡ Ȣ˜ȡ€ȯ–ȡ¡š¡ȰȪȡ“ȡ
€ȡ“ȡ˜

District (State)
ǔ‡›ȡ
šȡϙ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:12 2/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

6. Complainant / Informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[
(a) Name
“ȡ˜ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣšͪÛ‘š
(b) Father's/Husband's Name
ͪ”ȡ”Ǔ€ȡ“ȡ˜
(c) Date/Year of Birth
‡Û˜ǓͬŸ[ (d) Nationality
šȡçĚȣ™ȡINDIA

(e) UID No.
™Ǘ]_ŒȢ Ȳ
(f) Passport No.
”ȡ ”ȪŠ[ Ȳ

Date of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȧǓͬ Place of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȡèȡ“

(g) Occupation
噝 ȡ™
(h) Address

”ȡ
S.No. Address Type
”ȡ€ȡ Address
”ȡ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš
1 Present Address PS CITY NUH, CITY NUH, NUH, HARYANA,
INDIA
2 Permanent Address PS CITY NUH, CITY NUH, NUH, HARYANA,
INDIA
(i) Phone number
‘Ǘš—ȡŸ Ȳ Mobile
˜Ȫ–ȡ^› Ȳ


7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars

£ȡ ȲǑ‘Ê’\£ȡ
\ͧ—™Ǖȏ€ȡ”ǗšȯͪšŽ Ǒ¡Ž[“

S. No. Name
“ȡ˜ Alias
`”“ȡ˜ Relative's Name
ǐšæȯ‘ȡš€ȡ“ȡ˜

Đ Ȳ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:12 3/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant

ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[ɮȡšȡ
ǐš”ȪŠ[‘ȯšȣ ȯ‘‡[€šȡ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ

9. Particulars of properties of interest

 Ȳ–ǔے à”ǔ׏€ȡ
ͪšŽ
S. No. Property Type
 à”ǔ׏€ȯSub Type
`”Ĥ€ȡš Value(In Rs/-)
˜Ǘã™
ǽ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš ˜Ʌ
AUTOMOBILES AND
1 .00
OTHERS
10. Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-)
…Ȫšȣ¡Ǖ_ à”ǔ׏€ȡ€Ǖ›˜Ǘã™
ǽ˜Ʌ

11. Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any

˜ǙיǕ ˜Ȣ¢ȡǐš”ȪŠ[™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ™Ǒ‘€Ȫ_¡Ȫ

S. No. UIDB Number

™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ

Đ Ȳ

12. First Information contents

Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡØ™

 ȯȡ˜ȯĮȢ˜ȡ“Ĥ–Û’€\• šȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘ¡ȱĮȢ˜ȡ“‡ȢǓ“ȯ‘“™¡¡Ȱͩ€˜Ȱͧ ”ȡ¡ȣšͪÛġ
€Ǖ˜ȡš“0 926“Ǘ¡ȱȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘ¡ȱ˜Ȱ–ȫš š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ“0 HR -74 GV -9016”šĜȡ_š€ȯ”‘”š
ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘ¡ȱ˜ȯȰ“ȡ¡ǗȱǑ‘“ȡ€31.7.2023€ȯ˜ȯȡ’ȡͧ˜[€‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȡ€ȧŒ™ǕŠȣ€ȯ‘ȫšȡ“
€ȡ“Ǘ“噝èȡŒ™ǕŠȣ˜ȯšȯ ȡǓ“0j˜–Ȣšͧ Ȳ¡Ĥ–Û’€\• šȡ“ȡž¡š“ǗȲ¡—Ȣ˜™èŠȡ•
 š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ€ȯ ˜™€šȣ–1/1.30 PM €ȡ¡Ȫ‚ȡ€ȧ˜ȰǓ“0j˜–Ȣšͧ Ȳ¡˜™èŠȡ•€ȯˆÛŒȡ
”ȡ€[“Ǖ¡”š˜ȫ‡Ǘ‘ȯͩ€‡Ȱ ȯ¡ȣ˜ȯȡ’ȡͧ˜[€‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȡˆÖŒȡ”ȡ€[€ȯ”ȡ ”¡Ǘȱ…ȢȪf€
‘˜ ȯ€šȣ–600/700]‘˜Ȣ‡Ȫf€¡ȣ ˜Ǖ‘ȡ™€ȯȯ\”“ȯ\”“ȯ¡ȡȪ˜ȯ›ȡ‹ȤŒÖŒȡ”אšȡ
\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš›ȯ€š™ȡğȡ˜ȯ]“ȯȡ›ȯ›Ȫ‚Ȫȡ]“ȯ‡ȡ“ȯȡ›ȯȡ¡“Ȫȡ”Ǖͧ› ”ȡŠȹ”š‡ȡ“
›ȯȡ¡˜›ȡ€šȯ¡Ǖ™ȯˆÖŒȡ”ȡ€[ ȯ“Ǘ¡ȱ– \ŒŒȡ€ȧš•\›š ȯ Ȫ¡“ȡšȪŒ”š¡Ȫȯ¡Ǖ™ȯ`Ē
—ȢŒ€ȪšȪ€ȯ¡Ǖ™ȯ‡ȡš¡ȯȯ‡–˜Ȱȡj˜–Ȣšͧ ¡ȱǓ“ǐš¢€˜™èŠȡ•˜™ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ€ȯ`Ē

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:12 4/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

—ȢŒ€ȪšȪ€“ȯ€ȯͧ›f‚ažȡ›ȡ˜ȪŒ“Ǘ¡ȱ”š”¡Ǘȱ…€š‚ȡŒȢ€Ȫ ȡ_Œ˜ȯŒȡ€š€ȯ˜™˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“
€ȯ Œ€€ȯ–Ȣ…˜ȯŒȯȯȡ˜Ȱ‚ȡŒȢ š€ȡšȣ€ȧŒȡ_š ȢŠ”š–Ȱ‹ȡ¡Ǖ]ȡ€ȧ\…ȡ“€`Ē
—ȢŒ˜ȯšȣ‚ȡŒȢ€ȧš•]_kš—ȢŒ˜ȯ ȯ›Ȫ‚Ȫ“ȯ˜Ǖˆȯ›ȡ‹ȤŒÖŒȪ ȯȡ”אšȪ ȯ…ȪŠȯ˜ȡšȣȡ
\Ȱ’‘ȯžȢ€͠Ȫ ȯ•ȡ™šͩ€™ȯ@‡Ȫ`”0Ǔ“ǐš¢€\”“ȢǐšȪ›š ȯ5•ȡ™šͩ€fȡ–…ȡ€šȯ
¡Ǖf‚ȡŒȢ ȯ“Ȣ…ȯ`š¡ȣš¡ȡȡ€ȧ˜Ǖˆȯ‡ȡ“ ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧǓ“™ ȯ˜ȯšȣ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ˜ȯ]‚
›‚ȡ‘ȣ‡Ȫ–ȡ‘˜ȯ”ȡ€š“ȯ”š]‚›‚ȡ“ȯȡ›ȯȡ˜ȯšȯ ȡ˜ȡš”ȢŠ€š“ȯȡ›Ȫ€ȡ“ȡ˜
ǐš‡ȡ“”Ǖğ ȡͩ€š“_˜”Ǖğȡͧ›‘ ȫͩ€“”Ǖğ˜Ǖ–Ȣ“ š•šȡ‡”Ǖğ` ˜ȡ“ȫͩ•€”Ǖğ€˜Ǿ
^š ȡ‘”Ǖğ¡ȡͧ˜‘Ǔ“ȡ Ȣ™ȡ“žȡ¡”Ǖš“‚›ȣ“Ǘ¡ȱȡ\ۙ“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǘ˜å™ͩ€ȯȡ˜ȯšȣ
‚ȡŒȢ˜ȯŒȰ耖ȪŒ[€ȯ\ۑš š€ȡšȣȡ€ȧŠȡ€ȧ ȰŠ€ȧfÈ̚ȡ–ȰŠšȣ—ȢȢ‡Ȫ—Ȣ‚ȡŒȢ€ȯ\ۑš
‡›‚_‡Ȫǐš‡ȡ“ ȡͩ€š“_˜ Ȫͩ€“ š•šȡ‡ȫͩ•€^š ȡ‘`”šȪȏ“ȯ\”“ȯ ȡȢ
]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ““ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǘ˜600/700€ȯ ȡͧ˜›€š š€ȡšȣͫŒ™ǕŠȣ˜ȯ–ȡ’ȡŒȡ›ȣ¡Ȱȡ˜ȯšȯ
 ȡ‡ȡ“ ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧǓ“™ ȯ“ȡ¡€˜ȡš”ȢŠ€ȧ¡Ȱȡ˜ȯšȣ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ“0 HR -74 GV
-9016˜ȡ€ȡ[ŠȡŠȡ Ǖ˜Ȫ€Ȫ“ȡ¡€‡›ȡ™ȡ¡Ȱ@‡ȪǑ‘“ȡ€31.07.2023€Ȫ€ȡ“Ǖ“噝èȡŒ™ǗŠȣ˜ȯ
å™è¡Ȫ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ˜Ȱ“ȯ\”“Ȣ…ȪŠȪ–ȡšȯmlr “¡ȣ€Šȡ_ȡ˜Ȱ“ȯ‘šȡ菓¡ȣ‘ȣ@‡Ȫ]‡˜Ȱ“ȯ
\”“Ȣ‘šȡè]”€Ȫ”ȯž€š‘ȣ¡Ȱ‡Ȫ\–˜Ȱ\”“ȢMLR €Šȡ€š]”€Ȫ”ȯž€š‘ǗȲ‚ȡ
@]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“`”šȪȏȡ“ȡ˜”׏ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǘ˜600/700]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“€ȯͨ›ȡ•€ȡ“Ǘ“Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ€ȧ
‡ȡ™ȯ@SD-Ĥȡȸͧ ”ȡ¡ȣšͪÛ‘š“0926“Ǘ¡ȱ…ȡ›€ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘ¡ȱǑ‘“ȡ€1.8.2023
\‡ȡ“ȡ^  ˜™f€ͧ›ͨ‘šȡèͧ ”ȡ¡ȣšͪÛġ926“Ǘȱ¡…ȡ›€ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢȡ“ȡž¡š
“Ǘȱ¡–šͨ›ȡ•1ǐš‡ȡ“”Ǖğ ȡͩ€š2_™˜”Ǖğȡͧ›‘3žȪͩ€“”Ǖğ˜Ǖǒ–“4 š•šȡ‡”Ǖğ
` ˜ȡ“5ȫͩ•€”Ǖğ€˜Ǿ6_š ȡ‘”Ǖğ¡ȡͧ˜‘Ǔ“ȡ Ȣžȡ¡”Ǘš“‚›ȣȡ\ۙ600/700“ȡ˜”ȡ
“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜å™ǔȏȡ¡‘š€ȡˆÖŒȡ”ȡ€[“Ǘȱ¡–ȡ–`”šȪȏ]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“ɮȡšȡ¡˜˜žšȡ¡Ȫ€š_Š
”אš›ȡ‹ȤŒȲŒȡ\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš ȯ›ȯž¡Ȫ€š\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš ȯ•ȡ™ǐšȲ‚€š€ȯ‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȡ
˜ȯ–ȡ’ȡŒȡ›“ȯȡ™ȡğȢ™Ȫ€ȯ ȡ˜ȡš”ȢŠ€š€ȯ…ȪŠ”¡Ǖ…ȡ“ȯȡ”Ǖͧ› –›€Ȫ˜ȡš“ȯͩ€Ǔ“™ ȯ
¡˜›ȡ€š€ȯ…ȪŠ”¡Ǖ…ȡ“ȯȡ‚ȡŒȢ š€ȡšȣ“HR74GV-9016˜ȯȪŒ•ȪŒ€š€ȯ]‚›‚ȡ“ȯ–ȡšȯ–ȡ
‡Ǖ˜[‡Ȱš’ȡšȡ148,149,332, 353,186,307, 435, IPC 25-54-59 A ACT ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡–ȡšȯ‘šȡè
ȡ“ȡ”šĤȡ܏¡Ȫ“ȯ”š€ȡ™˜Ȣ˜Ǖ€‘˜ȡ“253Ǒ‘“ȡ€01.08.2023’ȡšȡ148,149,332, 353,186,307,
435, IPC 25-54-59 A ACT ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡‘‡[šǔ‡0ͩ€™ȡ‡ȡ€šFIR ͩ€Ĥ‚ȡȲš

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:12 5/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

ĤǓ™ȡ€àܙǗŠšɮȡšȡȰ™ȡš€š€ȯè”Ȱž›ǐš”ȪŠ[è”Ȱž›SPO ˜Ȫ0™€ȧ“93ɮȡšȡ_›ȡ€ȡ˜ǔ‡èĚȯŠ
 ȡ¡–“Ǘȱ¡ȡ`ͅ\ͬ’€ȡǐš™Ȫͩ€ ȯȡ˜ȯ—ȯ‡Ȣ‡ȡš¡ȣ¡Ȱ@
I/O SI ȯ‘Ĥ€ȡž111“Ǘ¡Ȳ7082411970

13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.

€ȧ‚™Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ…ǗȲͩ€`”šȪȏ‡ȡ“€ȡšȣ ȯ”ȡ…›ȡ¡Ȱͩ€\”šȡ’€š“ȯ€ȡšȣ€ȡ
˜‘ Ȳ˜Ʌ`ã›ȯ’ȡšȡ€ȯ¡¡Ȱ
(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation
Ĥ€šŽ‘‡[ͩ€™ȡ‚™ȡkš‡ȡȲ…€ȯ
Rank
”‘SI (Sub-Inspector)
ͧ›fͧ›™ȡ‚™ȡor ( ™ȡ
(2) Directed (Name of I.O.)
‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ“ȡ˜
SURJEET SINGH

No.
 Ȳ428GGN to take up the Investigation
€Ȫ‡ȡȲ…\”“ȯ”ȡ ˜Ʌ›ȯ“ȯ€ȯ
ͧ›fǓ“‘ȶžǑ‘™ȡ‚™ȡor
™ȡ

Directed (Mobile No. of I.O.)

‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ˜Ȫ–ȡ^›“Ȳ–š

(3) Refused investigation due to

‡ȡȲ…€ȯͧ›for
€ȯ€ȡšŽ^Ȳ€ȡšͩ€™ȡ
District
ǔ«›ȡ
™ȡ
(4) Transferred to P.S.
ȡ“ȡ

on point of jurisdiction
€Ȫ¢ȯğȡͬ’€ȡš€ȯ
€ȡšŽ¡èȡȲǐš
F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded
and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost.
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȪĤȡͧ˜€ȧ”±€š Ǖ“ȡ_‚™Ȣ ¡ȣ‘‡[¡Ǖ_˜ȡ“ȡkšf€€Ȩ”ȢǓ“žǕã€
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[€Ȫ‘ȣ‚™Ȣ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:12 6/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

R.O.A.C.
]šjf Ȣ

14. Signature / Thumb Signature of Officer in charge, Police

impression Station
ȡ“ȡĤ—ȡšȣ€ȯ¡èȡ¢š
of the complainant /
informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Name
“ȡ˜Ombir
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȯ¡èȡ¢š\Ȳ‚Ǘ‹ȯ Rank
”‘I (Inspector)
€ȡǓ“žȡ“
No.
 Ȳ

15. Date and time of dispatch to the court

\‘ȡ›˜ɅĤȯŸŽ€ȧǑ‘“ȡȲ€

kš ˜™

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:12 7/7
 Annexure 4
HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

1. District
ǔ«›ȡNUH P.S.
ȡ“ȡCITY NUH Year
Ÿ[

FIR No.
Ĥ Ǘǐš Ȳ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€


2. S.No. Acts
\ͬ’Ǔ“™˜ Sections
’ȡšȡ
fȱ

Đ Ȳ
1 IPC 1860 148
2 IPC 1860 149
3 IPC 1860 435
4 IPC 1860 295-A
5 IPC 1860 307
6 ARMS ACT, 1959 25

3. (a) Occurrence of offence

\”šȡ’€ȧƒŠ“ȡ

1 Day
Ǒ‘“Monday Date from
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ ȯ Date To
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€€
 

Time Period
 ˜™\ͬ’Pahar 5 Time From
 ˜™ ȯ Time To
 ˜™€
hrs hrs

(b) Information received at P.S.

ȡ“ȡ‡¡ȡȲ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ Time
 ˜™
 Ǘ…“ȡĤȡ܏¡Ǖ_  hrs
(c) General Diary Reference Entry No.
Ĥͪǔ犠Ȳ Time
 ˜™

šȪ‡“ȡ˜…ȡ Ȳ‘—[
 
hrs

4. Type of Information
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡĤ€ȡšWritten

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:41 1/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

5. Place of Occurrence

ƒŠ“ȡ萛

1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S.

ȡ“ȡ ȯ‘ǗšȣkšǑ‘žȡNORTH-EAST, 1 Beat No.
–ȢŠ Ȳ
Km(s)
(b) Address
”ȡCITY NUH,

(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of P.S.
™Ǒ‘ȡ“ȡ Ȣ˜ȡ€ȯ–ȡ¡š¡ȰȪȡ“ȡ
€ȡ“ȡ˜

District (State)
ǔ‡›ȡ
šȡϙ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:41 2/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

6. Complainant / Informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[
(a) Name
“ȡ˜SI ANIL KUMAR
(b) Father's/Husband's Name
ͪ”ȡ”Ǔ€ȡ“ȡ˜
(c) Date/Year of Birth
‡Û˜ǓͬŸ[ (d) Nationality
šȡçĚȣ™ȡINDIA

(e) UID No.
™Ǘ]_ŒȢ Ȳ
(f) Passport No.
”ȡ ”ȪŠ[ Ȳ

Date of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȧǓͬ Place of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȡèȡ“

(g) Occupation
噝 ȡ™
(h) Address

”ȡ
S.No. Address Type
”ȡ€ȡ Address
”ȡ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš
1 Present Address CID REWARI, REWARI, HARYANA, INDIA
2 Permanent Address CID REWARI, REWARI, HARYANA, INDIA
(i) Phone number
‘Ǘš—ȡŸ Ȳ Mobile
˜Ȫ–ȡ^› Ȳ


7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars

£ȡ ȲǑ‘Ê’\£ȡ
\ͧ—™Ǖȏ€ȡ”ǗšȯͪšŽ Ǒ¡Ž[“

S. No. Name
“ȡ˜ Alias
`”“ȡ˜ Relative's Name
ǐšæȯ‘ȡš€ȡ“ȡ˜

Đ Ȳ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:41 3/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant

ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[ɮȡšȡ
ǐš”ȪŠ[‘ȯšȣ ȯ‘‡[€šȡ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ

9. Particulars of properties of interest

 Ȳ–ǔے à”ǔ׏€ȡ
ͪšŽ
S. No. Property Type
 à”ǔ׏€ȯSub Type
`”Ĥ€ȡš Value(In Rs/-)
˜Ǘã™
ǽ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš ˜Ʌ

10. Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-)

…Ȫšȣ¡Ǖ_ à”ǔ׏€ȡ€Ǖ›˜Ǘã™
ǽ˜Ʌ

11. Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any

˜ǙיǕ ˜Ȣ¢ȡǐš”ȪŠ[™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ™Ǒ‘€Ȫ_¡Ȫ

S. No. UIDB Number

™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ

Đ Ȳ

12. First Information contents

Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡØ™

 ȯȡ˜ȯĮȢ˜ȡ“Ĥ–Û’€\• šȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘ¡ȱĮȢ˜ȡ“‡ȢǓ“ȯ‘“™¡¡Ȱͩ€˜ȰSI \Ǔ“›€Ǖ˜ȡš“0
2054/C €ȡ™ȡ[›™`””Ǖͧ› \’Ȣ¢€‚Ǖ܏…šͪ—ȡ‚šȯȡŒȢ˜ȯ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ“0 HR-03Z-3428
è€Ȫšͪ”™Ȫ”š–ȫš…ȡ›€Ȱ“ȡ¡Ǖȱ@Ǒ‘“ȡ€31.07.2023€Ȫ˜ȰȡĮȢǑ‘“ȯž™ȡ‘`””Ǖͧ› 
\’Ȣ¢€‚Ǖ܏…šͪ—ȡ‚šȯȡŒȢ˜™ǐšŒšSI –ȡ–Ǘ›ȡ›“0 706 NNL €ȯ‚ȡŒȢ“0 HR-03Z-3428€ȯ
 ȡ˜ȯȡ’ȡͧ˜[€‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȡ€ȧŒ™ǕŠȣ€ȯ‘ȫšȡ“€ȡ“Ǘ“噝èȡŒ™ǕŠȣ€ȯͧ›f“Ǖ¡]™ȯ¡Ǖ™ȯ
ȯ@¡˜™ȡğȡ€ȯžǕǽ¡Ȫ“ȯ”šˆÛŒȡ…ȫ€€ȧš•‡ȡš¡ȯȪ` Ȣ ˜™€šȣ–500/600`Ē—ȢŒ‡Ȫ
˜ȯ˜Ǖǔ蛘 ˜Ǖ‘ȡ™€ȯȯ\”“ȯ\”“ȯ¡ȡȪ˜ȯ›ȡ‹ȤŒÖŒȡ”אšȡ\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš›ȯ€š™ȡğȡ˜ȯ
]“ȯȡ›ȯ›Ȫ‚Ȫȡ]“ȯ‡ȡ“ȯȡ›ȯȡ¡“Ȫȡ”Ǖͧ› ”ȡŠȹ”š‡ȡ“›ȯȡ¡˜›ȡ€šȯ¡Ǖ™ȯˆÖŒȡ
”ȡ€[ ȯ“Ǘ¡ȱ– \ŒŒȡ€ȧš•\›š ȯ Ȫ¡“ȡšȪŒ”š¡Ȫȯ¡Ǖ™ȯ`Ē—ȢŒ]š¡ȣȢ@ĮȢǑ‘“ȯž
™ȡ‘`””Ǖͧ› \’Ȣ¢€‚Ǖ܏…šͪ—ȡ‚šȯȡŒȢ˜™ǐšŒšSI –ȡ–Ǘ›ȡ›“0 706 NNL `Ē—ȢŒ€Ȫ
 ˜ˆȡ“ȯ—ȢŒ€ȡ€ȡšŽ‡ȡ““ȯ€ȯͧ›f‚ažȡ›ȡ˜ȪŒ“Ǘ¡ȱ”š‚ȡŒȢ€Ȫ ȡ_Œ˜ȯ›‚ȡ€š]‚ȯ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:42 4/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

…›ȯ‚™ȯ@˜Ȱ‚ȡŒȢ š€ȡšȣ€ȧŒȡ_š ȢŠ”š–Ȱ‹ȡ¡Ǖ]ȡ€ȧ\…ȡ“€`Ē—ȢŒ˜ȯšȣ‚ȡŒȢ€ȧš•
]_kš—ȢŒ“ȯ›ȡ‹ȤŒÖŒȪ ȯȡ”אšȪ ȯ…ȪŠȯ˜ȯšȣ‚ȡŒȢ”š¡˜›ȡ€šǑ‘™ȡ@˜Ȱ–…ȡ–€šȯ
¡Ǖ™ȯ‚ȡŒȢ ȯ“Ȣ…ȯ`š¡ȣš¡ȡȡ€ȧ˜Ǖˆȯ‡ȡ“ ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧǓ“™ ȯ˜ȯšȣ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ˜ȯ]‚
›‚ȡ‘ȣ@˜Ȱ“ȯ ȡ_Œ˜ȯ¡Š€š˜Ǖǔ耛 ȯ‡ȡ“–…ȡ_@]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“`”šȪȏȡ“ȡ˜”׏ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǘ˜
500/600]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“€ȯͨ›ȡ•€ȡ“Ǘ“Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ€ȧ‡ȡ™ȯ@SD ĤȡȸSI \Ǔ“›€Ǖ˜ȡš“0 2054/C
€ȡ™ȡ[›™`””Ǖͧ› \’Ȣ¢€‚Ǖ܏…šͪ—ȡ‚šȯȡŒȢǑ‘“ȡ€01.08.2023\‡ȡ“ȡ^  ˜™f€
ͧ›ͨ‘šȡèSI \Ǔ“›€Ǖ˜ȡš2054/C `””Ǖͧ› \’Ȣ¢€‚Ǖ܏…šͪ—ȡ‚šȯȡŒȢ–šͨ›ȡ•
“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜˜ȯ˜Ǖǔ蛘 ˜Ǖ‘ȡ™€ȯ500/600å™ǔȏȡ¡‘š€ȡ‚ažȡ›ȡ˜ȪŒ“Ǘȱ¡–ȡ–
Ǒ‘“ȡ€31.07.2023€Ȫ“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“ɮȡšȡ¡˜˜žšȡ¡Ȫ€š_Š”אš›ȡ‹ȤŒȲŒȡ
\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš ȯ›ȯž¡Ȫ€š‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȡ˜ȯ]“ȯ›Ȫ‚Ȫȡ]“ȯ‡ȡ“ȯȡ›ȯȡ¡“Ȫȡ”Ǖͧ› 
”ȡŠȹ”š‡ȡ“›ȯȡ¡˜›ȡ€š“ȯ–ȡšȯ–ȡ‡Ǖ˜[148,149,435, 295A,307 IPC 25-54-59 A ACT –ȡšȯ
‘šȡ菐ȡ“ȡ”šĤȡ܏¡Ȫ“ȯ”š€ȡ™˜Ȣ˜Ǖ€‘˜ȡ“255Ǒ‘“ȡ€01.08.2023’ȡšȡ148,149,435,
295A,307 IPC 25-54-59 A ACT ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡‘‡[šǔ‡0ͩ€™ȡ‡ȡ€šFIR ͩ€Ĥ‚ȡȲš
ĤǓ™ȡ€àܙǗŠšɮȡšȡȰ™ȡš€š€ȯè”Ȱž›ǐš”ȪŠ[è”Ȱž›SPO  ǕǓ“›70ɮȡšȡ_›ȡ€ȡ˜ǔ‡èĚȯŠ
 ȡ¡–“Ǘȱ¡ȡ`ͅ\ͬ’€ȡǐš™Ȫͩ€ ȯȡ˜ȯ—ȯ‡Ȣ‡ȡš¡ȣ¡Ȱ@
I/O- SI SURJEET 486/GGM
D/O- BHARAT SINGH

13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.

€ȧ‚™Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ…ǗȲͩ€`”šȪȏ‡ȡ“€ȡšȣ ȯ”ȡ…›ȡ¡Ȱͩ€\”šȡ’€š“ȯ€ȡšȣ€ȡ
˜‘ Ȳ˜Ʌ`ã›ȯ’ȡšȡ€ȯ¡¡Ȱ
(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation
Ĥ€šŽ‘‡[ͩ€™ȡ‚™ȡkš‡ȡȲ…€ȯ
Rank
”‘SI (Sub-Inspector)
ͧ›fͧ›™ȡ‚™ȡor ( ™ȡ
(2) Directed (Name of I.O.)
‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ“ȡ˜
SURJEET SINGH

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:42 5/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

No.
 Ȳ428GGN to take up the Investigation
€Ȫ‡ȡȲ…\”“ȯ”ȡ ˜Ʌ›ȯ“ȯ€ȯ
ͧ›fǓ“‘ȶžǑ‘™ȡ‚™ȡor
™ȡ

Directed (Mobile No. of I.O.)

‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ˜Ȫ–ȡ^›“Ȳ–š

(3) Refused investigation due to

‡ȡȲ…€ȯͧ›for
€ȯ€ȡšŽ^Ȳ€ȡšͩ€™ȡ
District
ǔ«›ȡ
™ȡ
(4) Transferred to P.S.
ȡ“ȡ

on point of jurisdiction
€Ȫ¢ȯğȡͬ’€ȡš€ȯ
€ȡšŽ¡èȡȲǐš
F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded
and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost.
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȪĤȡͧ˜€ȧ”±€š Ǖ“ȡ_‚™Ȣ ¡ȣ‘‡[¡Ǖ_˜ȡ“ȡkšf€€Ȩ”ȢǓ“žǕã€
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[€Ȫ‘ȣ‚™Ȣ

R.O.A.C.
]šjf Ȣ

14. Signature / Thumb Signature of Officer in charge, Police

impression Station
ȡ“ȡĤ—ȡšȣ€ȯ¡èȡ¢š
of the complainant /
informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Name
“ȡ˜Ombir
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȯ¡èȡ¢š\Ȳ‚Ǘ‹ȯ Rank
”‘I (Inspector)
€ȡǓ“žȡ“
No.
 Ȳ

15. Date and time of dispatch to the court

\‘ȡ›˜ɅĤȯŸŽ€ȧǑ‘“ȡȲ€

kš ˜™

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:45:42 6/6
 Annexure 5
HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

1. District
ǔ«›ȡNUH P.S.
ȡ“ȡCITY NUH Year
Ÿ[

FIR No.
Ĥ Ǘǐš Ȳ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€


2. S.No. Acts
\ͬ’Ǔ“™˜ Sections
’ȡšȡ
fȱ

Đ Ȳ
1 IPC 1860 148
2 IPC 1860 149
3 IPC 1860 435
4 IPC 1860 295-A
5 IPC 1860 307
6 ARMS ACT, 1959 25

3. (a) Occurrence of offence

\”šȡ’€ȧƒŠ“ȡ

1 Day
Ǒ‘“Monday Date from
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ ȯ Date To
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€€
 

Time Period
 ˜™\ͬ’Pahar 5 Time From
 ˜™ ȯ Time To
 ˜™€
hrs hrs

(b) Information received at P.S.

ȡ“ȡ‡¡ȡȲ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ Time
 ˜™
 Ǘ…“ȡĤȡ܏¡Ǖ_  hrs
(c) General Diary Reference Entry No.
Ĥͪǔ犠Ȳ Time
 ˜™

šȪ‡“ȡ˜…ȡ Ȳ‘—[
 
hrs

4. Type of Information
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡĤ€ȡšWritten

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:46:10 1/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

5. Place of Occurrence

ƒŠ“ȡ萛

1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S.

ȡ“ȡ ȯ‘ǗšȣkšǑ‘žȡNORTH-WEST, 2 Beat No.
–ȢŠ Ȳ
Km(s)
(b) Address
”ȡDELHI ALWAR ROAD NUH,

(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of P.S.
™Ǒ‘ȡ“ȡ Ȣ˜ȡ€ȯ–ȡ¡š¡ȰȪȡ“ȡ
€ȡ“ȡ˜

District (State)
ǔ‡›ȡ
šȡϙ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:46:10 2/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

6. Complainant / Informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[
(a) Name
“ȡ˜ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣǒ–‡Ʌġ€Ǖ˜ȡš
(b) Father's/Husband's Name
ͪ”ȡ”Ǔ€ȡ“ȡ˜
(c) Date/Year of Birth
‡Û˜ǓͬŸ[ (d) Nationality
šȡçĚȣ™ȡINDIA

(e) UID No.
™Ǘ]_ŒȢ Ȳ
(f) Passport No.
”ȡ ”ȪŠ[ Ȳ

Date of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȧǓͬ Place of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȡèȡ“

(g) Occupation
噝 ȡ™
(h) Address

”ȡ
S.No. Address Type
”ȡ€ȡ Address
”ȡ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš
1 Present Address ‚Ǖ܏…š^€ȡ_“ȡš“ȫ›MAHENDERGARH,
HARYANA, INDIA
2 Permanent Address ‚Ǖ܏…š^€ȡ_“ȡš“ȫ›MAHENDERGARH,
HARYANA, INDIA
(i) Phone number
‘Ǘš—ȡŸ Ȳ Mobile
˜Ȫ–ȡ^› Ȳ

7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars

£ȡ ȲǑ‘Ê’\£ȡ
\ͧ—™Ǖȏ€ȡ”ǗšȯͪšŽ Ǒ¡Ž[“

S. No. Name
“ȡ˜ Alias
`”“ȡ˜ Relative's Name
ǐšæȯ‘ȡš€ȡ“ȡ˜

Đ Ȳ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:46:10 3/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant

ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[ɮȡšȡ
ǐš”ȪŠ[‘ȯšȣ ȯ‘‡[€šȡ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ

9. Particulars of properties of interest

 Ȳ–ǔے à”ǔ׏€ȡ
ͪšŽ
S. No. Property Type
 à”ǔ׏€ȯSub Type
`”Ĥ€ȡš Value(In Rs/-)
˜Ǘã™
ǽ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš ˜Ʌ

10. Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-)

…Ȫšȣ¡Ǖ_ à”ǔ׏€ȡ€Ǖ›˜Ǘã™
ǽ˜Ʌ

11. Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any

˜ǙיǕ ˜Ȣ¢ȡǐš”ȪŠ[™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ™Ǒ‘€Ȫ_¡Ȫ

S. No. UIDB Number

™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ

Đ Ȳ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:46:10 4/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

12. First Information contents

Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡØ™

 ȯȡ˜ȯĮȢ˜ȡ“Ĥ–Ȳ’€\• šȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘ¡ȲĮȢ˜ȡ“‡ȢǓ“ȯ‘˜™¡¡Ȱͩ€˜Ȱͧ ”ȡ¡ȣǒ–‡Ʌġ€Ǖ˜ȡš
“0. 1156/GGM ‚Ǖ܏…š^€ȡ_“ȡš“ȫ›˜ȯȰ“ȡ¡ǗȲ‡ȪǑ‘“ȡȲ€30.07.23€Ȫǔ‡›ȡǓ“šȣ¢€‚Ǖ܏…š
^€ȡ_“Ǘ¡Ȳǔ‡ €ȯ”ȡ ‚Ǖ܏…š^€ȡ_“ȡš“Ȫ›€ȡ—Ȣ\ǓǐšÈ€ȡ™[—ȡš¡Ȱ€Ȫ›ȯ€š˜ȯȡ’ȡͧ˜[€
‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȡŒ™ǗŠȣ€ȯͧ›f š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ“0. HR03GV2828˜¡ȣȲġȡ–Ǖ›ȯšȪǓ“™Ȫ€ȯ ȡ“Ǘ¡
]™ȡȡ‡ȪǑ‘“ȡȲ€31.07.2023˜ȯȡ’ȡͧ˜[€‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȡŒ™ǗŠȣ€ȯͧ›fǔ‡›ȡǓ“šȣ¢€ĮȢ
ͪæ‡Ȣ56/CPF €ȯ›ȯ€šǑ‘ã›ȣ\›ššȪŒ“Ǘ¡˜ȯ– \ɬŒȡ€ȧš•‡ȡš¡ȯȯ‡Ȫ™ȡğȡ€ȯ
ͪšȪƨ˜ȯ˜ȯ˜Ǖǔ蛘 ˜ȡ‡€ȯ500/600™Ǖ€Ȫɮȡšȡ^Ȋ‹ȯ¡Ȫ€šȡ¡“ȯ”š›ȡ‹ȤŒȲŒȪ
”אš–ȡ‡ȢȪŒ•ȪŒ]‚‡“Ȣ¡˜›ȡ€šš¡ȯȯ‡Ȫǔ‡›ȡǓ“ǐš¢€‚ȡŒȢ ȯ`š€š`“€Ȫ
 ˜ˆȡ“ȯ€ȡĤ™ȡ €šš¡ȯȯ@\…ȡ“€`Ē—ȢŒɮȡšȡ¡˜ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ š€ȡšȣ“0. HR03GV2828
˜¡ȣȲġȡ–Ǖ›ȯšȪǓ“™ȪšȲ‚ •ȯ‘€Ȫ›ȡ‹ȤŒȲŒȪ”אšȪ ȯȪŒ“ȡžǕǾ€šǑ‘™ȡ@˜Ȱ“ȯ–…ȡ€šȯ¡Ǖf
‚ȰŒȢ ȯ`š€š˜Ǖžͩ€› ȯ\”“Ȣ‡ȡ“–…ȡ_@‡Ȫ`”šȪȏ—ȢŒ“ȯ‚ȡŒȢ š€ȡšȣ`”šȪȏ€Ȫ]‚
›‚ȡ‘ȣ@]šȪͪ”™ȡ“`”šȪȏ“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǘ˜500/600]šȪͪ”™ȡ“€ȯͨ›ȡ•€ȡ“Ǘ“Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ
€ȧ‡ȡfSD-ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣǒ–‡Ʌġ€Ǖ˜ȡš1156/GGM ‚Ǖ܏…š^€ȡ_“ȡš“ȫ›Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€01.08.2023\‡ȡ“ȡ
^  ˜™f€ͧ›ͨ‘šȡ菘Ǖ‘_ͧ ”ȡ¡ȣǒ–‡ȯÛġ€Ǖ˜ȡš1156/GGM ‚Ǖ܏…š_€ȡ_“ȡš“ȫ›–š
ͨ›ȡ•“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜˜ȯ˜Ǖǔ蛘 ˜Ǖ‘ȡ™€ȯ500/600å™ǔȏȡ¡‘š€ȡǑ‘ã›ȣ\›ššȪŒ
“Ǘȱ¡–ȡ–Ǒ‘“ȡ€31.07.2023€Ȫ“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜]šȪ”Ȣ™ȡ“ɮȡšȡ¡˜˜žšȡ¡Ȫ€š_Š”אš
›ȡ‹ȤŒȲŒȡ\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš ȯ›ȯž¡Ȫ€š‡›ȡͧ—Ÿȯ€™ȡğȢ™Ȫ”š¡˜›ȡ€š“ȯȡȡ¡“Ȫ‡›ȡ“ȯȡ
”Ǖͧ› ”ȡŠȹͩ€‚ȡŒȢ š€ȡšȣHR03GV2828˜Ǒ¡Ûġ–Ǖ›ȯšȪ˜ȯ]‚›‚ȡ€ȯ‡ȡ“›ȯȡ¡˜›ȡ€š“ȯ
–ȡšȯ–ȡ‡Ǖ˜[148,149,435, 295A,307 IPC 25-54-59 A ACT –ȡšȯ‘šȡ菐ȡ“ȡ”šĤȡ܏¡Ȫ“ȯ”š
€ȡ™˜Ȣ˜Ǖ€‘˜ȡ“256Ǒ‘“ȡ€01.08.2023’ȡšȡ148,149,435, 295A,307 IPC 25-54-59 A ACT ȡ“ȡ
ž¡š“Ǘȱ¡ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡‘‡[šǔ‡0ͩ€™ȡ‡ȡ€šFIR ͩ€Ĥ‚ȡȲšĤǓ™ȡ€àܙǗŠšɮȡšȡȰ™ȡš€š€ȯ
è”Ȱž›ǐš”ȪŠ[è”Ȱž›SPO ’˜[–Ȣš198ɮȡšȡ_›ȡ€ȡ˜ǔ‡èĚȯŠ ȡ¡–“Ǘȱ¡ȡ`ͅ\ͬ’€ȡǐš™Ȫͩ€
 ȯȡ˜ȯ—ȯ‡Ȣ‡ȡš¡ȣ¡Ȱ@
I/O –ASI YOGESH 62/NUH
D/O – SI BHARAT 39/NUH

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:46:10 5/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.

€ȧ‚™Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ…ǗȲͩ€`”šȪȏ‡ȡ“€ȡšȣ ȯ”ȡ…›ȡ¡Ȱͩ€\”šȡ’€š“ȯ€ȡšȣ€ȡ
˜‘ Ȳ˜Ʌ`ã›ȯ’ȡšȡ€ȯ¡¡Ȱ
(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation
Ĥ€šŽ‘‡[ͩ€™ȡ‚™ȡkš‡ȡȲ…€ȯ
Rank
”‘SI (Sub-Inspector)
ͧ›fͧ›™ȡ‚™ȡor ( ™ȡ
(2) Directed (Name of I.O.)
‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ“ȡ˜
BHARAT SINGH

No.
 Ȳ39MWT to take up the Investigation
€Ȫ‡ȡȲ…\”“ȯ”ȡ ˜Ʌ›ȯ“ȯ€ȯ
ͧ›fǓ“‘ȶžǑ‘™ȡ‚™ȡor
™ȡ

Directed (Mobile No. of I.O.)

‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ˜Ȫ–ȡ^›“Ȳ–š

(3) Refused investigation due to

‡ȡȲ…€ȯͧ›for
€ȯ€ȡšŽ^Ȳ€ȡšͩ€™ȡ
District
ǔ«›ȡ
™ȡ
(4) Transferred to P.S.
ȡ“ȡ

on point of jurisdiction
€Ȫ¢ȯğȡͬ’€ȡš€ȯ
€ȡšŽ¡èȡȲǐš
F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded
and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost.
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȪĤȡͧ˜€ȧ”±€š Ǖ“ȡ_‚™Ȣ ¡ȣ‘‡[¡Ǖ_˜ȡ“ȡkšf€€Ȩ”ȢǓ“žǕã€
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[€Ȫ‘ȣ‚™Ȣ

R.O.A.C.
]šjf Ȣ

14. Signature of Officer in charge, Police

Station
ȡ“ȡĤ—ȡšȣ€ȯ¡èȡ¢š

Name
“ȡ˜Ombir

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:46:10 6/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

Signature / Thumb Rank

”‘I (Inspector)
impression
of the complainant / No.
 Ȳ
informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȯ¡èȡ¢š\Ȳ‚Ǘ‹ȯ
€ȡǓ“žȡ“

15. Date and time of dispatch to the court

\‘ȡ›˜ɅĤȯŸŽ€ȧǑ‘“ȡȲ€

kš ˜™

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:46:10 7/7
 Annexure 6
HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

1. District
ǔ«›ȡNUH P.S.
ȡ“ȡCITY NUH Year
Ÿ[

FIR No.
Ĥ Ǘǐš Ȳ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€


2. S.No. Acts
\ͬ’Ǔ“™˜ Sections
’ȡšȡ
fȱ

Đ Ȳ
1 IPC 1860 148
2 IPC 1860 149
3 IPC 1860 147
4 IPC 1860 186
5 IPC 1860 342
6 IPC 1860 332
7 IPC 1860 353
8 IPC 1860 307
9 IPC 1860 302
10 IPC 1860 379B
11 IPC 1860 120-B
12 IPC 1860 427
13 ARMS ACT, 1959 25

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:47:17 1/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

3. (a) Occurrence of offence

\”šȡ’€ȧƒŠ“ȡ

1 Day
Ǒ‘“Monday Date from
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ ȯ Date To
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€€
 

Time Period
 ˜™\ͬ’ Time From
 ˜™ ȯ Time To
 ˜™€
hrs hrs

(b) Information received at P.S.

ȡ“ȡ‡¡ȡȲ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ Time
 ˜™
 Ǘ…“ȡĤȡ܏¡Ǖ_  hrs
(c) General Diary Reference Entry No.
Ĥͪǔ犠Ȳ Time
 ˜™

šȪ‡“ȡ˜…ȡ Ȳ‘—[
 
hrs

4. Type of Information
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡĤ€ȡšWritten
5. Place of Occurrence

ƒŠ“ȡ萛

1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S.

ȡ“ȡ ȯ‘ǗšȣkšǑ‘žȡNORTH-EAST, 2 Beat No.
–ȢŠ Ȳ
Km(s)
(b) Address
”ȡNear Anaj Mandi NUH,

(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of P.S.
™Ǒ‘ȡ“ȡ Ȣ˜ȡ€ȯ–ȡ¡š¡ȰȪȡ“ȡ
€ȡ“ȡ˜

District (State)
ǔ‡›ȡ
šȡϙ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:47:17 2/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

6. Complainant / Informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[
(a) Name
“ȡ˜Ǔ“ǐš¢€\‡™€Ǖ˜ȡš
(b) Father's/Husband's Name
ͪ”ȡ”Ǔ€ȡ“ȡ˜
(c) Date/Year of Birth
‡Û˜ǓͬŸ[ (d) Nationality
šȡçĚȣ™ȡINDIA

(e) UID No.
™Ǘ]_ŒȢ Ȳ
(f) Passport No.
”ȡ ”ȪŠ[ Ȳ

Date of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȧǓͬ Place of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȡèȡ“

(g) Occupation
噝 ȡ™
(h) Address

”ȡ
S.No. Address Type
”ȡ€ȡ Address
”ȡ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš
1 Present Address Ĥ–Û’€ȡ“ȡȯŒȢ‘ȫ›ȡGGM, GURUGRAM,
HARYANA, INDIA
2 Permanent Address Ĥ–Û’€ȡ“ȡȯŒȢ‘ȫ›ȡGGM, GURUGRAM,
HARYANA, INDIA
(i) Phone number
‘Ǘš—ȡŸ Ȳ Mobile
˜Ȫ–ȡ^› Ȳ

7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars

£ȡ ȲǑ‘Ê’\£ȡ
\ͧ—™Ǖȏ€ȡ”ǗšȯͪšŽ Ǒ¡Ž[“

S. No. Name
“ȡ˜ Alias
`”“ȡ˜ Relative's Name
ǐšæȯ‘ȡš€ȡ“ȡ˜

Đ Ȳ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:47:18 3/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant

ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[ɮȡšȡ
ǐš”ȪŠ[‘ȯšȣ ȯ‘‡[€šȡ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ

9. Particulars of properties of interest

 Ȳ–ǔے à”ǔ׏€ȡ
ͪšŽ
S. No. Property Type
 à”ǔ׏€ȯSub Type
`”Ĥ€ȡš Value(In Rs/-)
˜Ǘã™
ǽ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš ˜Ʌ

10. Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-)

…Ȫšȣ¡Ǖ_ à”ǔ׏€ȡ€Ǖ›˜Ǘã™
ǽ˜Ʌ

11. Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any

˜ǙיǕ ˜Ȣ¢ȡǐš”ȪŠ[™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ™Ǒ‘€Ȫ_¡Ȫ

S. No. UIDB Number

™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ

Đ Ȳ

12. First Information contents

Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡØ™

ޙȡ“\‡ȡ“ȯǓ“ǐš¢€\‡™€Ǖ˜ȡšĤ–Û’€ȡ“ȡȯŒȢ‘ȫ›ȡ‚ǕǽĒȡ˜9999981830ޙȡ“ͩ€™ȡͩ€˜Ȱ
Ĥ–Û’€ȡ“ȡȯŒȢ‘ȫ›ȡȰ“ȡ¡Ǘȱ‡Ȫ€›Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€31.07.2023€Ȫ˜Ǖˆȯ`ͅ\ͬ’€ȡǐš™Ȫ ȯ]‘ȯž
Ĥȡ܏¡Ǖfͩ€]”\”“ȯȡ“ȡ€ȧ•Ȫ [ Ǒ¡€ȡ“Ǘ“噝èȡŒ™ǗŠȣ€ȯ“ǗȲ¡”¡Ǖ…ȯ@‡Ȫ Ǘ…“ȡ”š
˜Ȱ‚ȡŒȢ š€ȡšȣHR-30GV-5511 ȯ ȡȢ€˜[…ȡšȣSI ‘ȯȯÛġPSI \ǽŽHC žȯšȡ…ȡ›€C ”“
€Ǖ˜ȡšHGH Ǔ“š‡112/GGM HGH ‚Ǖǽ ȯ“0 2128/FTB €ȯ ȡ€ȡ“Ǘ“fȲ˜噝èȡŒ™ǗŠȣ€ȯ
ͧ›fȡ“ȡȯŒȢ‘ȫ›ȡ ȯšȡ“ȡǔ‡›ȡ“Ǘȱ¡€ȯͧ›fšȡ“ȡ¡Ǖ]^ ȢŒ™ǗŠȣ€ȯͧ›f¡˜ —Ȣǔ‡›ȡ
‚ǕǽĒȡ˜ ȯĮȢ˜“Ȣšͧ Ȳ¡IPS DCP ˜ȡ“ȯ š\”“Ȣ š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢèŠȡ• Ǒ¡Ĥ–Û’€ȡ“ȡ
IMT ˜ȡ“ȯ šINSP ‘ȯȯÛġĤ–Û’€ȡ“ȡǒ–›ȡ ”ǕšINSP šȡ¡Ǖ›‘ȯ\”“Ȣ2 š€ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ Ǒ¡
ǔ‡›ȡ˜ȡ“ȯ š€ȧQRT TEAM —Ȣ š€ȡšȣ– ˜ȯ¡˜ȡšȯ ȡȢ‡–¡˜ȡšȣ‚ȡͫŒ™ȡ ȡ_–šȡ“ȡ
“Ǘȱ¡€ȯ”ȡ \“ȡ‡˜ÖŒȢ‚ȯŠ€ȯ”ȡ ”¡…ȢȪ\…ȡ“€šȪŒ”š–¡Ǖ\ͬ’€ Ȳəȡ˜Ʌ›Ȫ‚]
‚™ȯ@ǔ‡“€ȯ¡ȡȪ˜ȯƒȡ€¡ͬ™ȡšȯ@ǔ‡Û¡Ȫ“ȯ Œ€”š–Œȯ–Œȯ”אš•ɇ€Ǒ‘™ȯȡ¡˜ȡšȡ

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:47:18 4/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

šȡèȡšȪ€ͧ›™ȡȡ¡˜ȡšȯa”š”šȡȡ‡ȡ“ ȯ˜ȡš“ȯ€ȧǓ“™ ȯ‚Ȫͧ›™ȡ…›ȡ“ȢžǕǽ€š
‘ȣ@—ȢŒɮȡšȡ•Ȱ€ȯ‚™ȯ”אš —Ȣ”Ǖͧ› €˜[…ȡǐš™Ȫ€Ȫ›‚ȯȡ‚ȡŒȢ™Ȫ€ȯͧžžȯŠǕŠ‚™ȯ@
—ȢŒɮȡšȡšȡèȡšȪ€š“ȯ€ȯͧ›™ȯ•Ȱ€ȯ‚™ȯ”אšȪ ȯŠ€šȡ€š˜ȯšȣ‚ȡŒȢ”›Š‚_@ȡ—ȢŒ
ɮȡšȡ¡˜ȯ”אš›ȡ‹ȤŒÛŒȪ ȯ…ȪŠȯ˜ȡšȣ‡Ȫ —Ȣ›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȯ¡ȡȪ˜ȯ“ȡ‡ȡ™‡\ ›ȡŒÛŒȯ šȣ™ȡ
šȡŒ”אšȯ@‡Ȫ”Ǖͧ› €˜[…ȡǐš™Ȫ€Ȫ––[šȡ”Ǘ[ͪ”Šȯš¡ȯ@ȡ”Ǖͧ› €˜[…ȡǐš™Ȫ€ȯ
˜Ȫ–ȡ_›ȡ” [‡–š‘èȢǓ†“ͧ›™ȯ@”Ǖͧ› ”ȡŠȹ˜ȯžȡͧ˜›\ۙ€˜[…ȡǐš™Ȫ“ȯ]טš¢ȡ€ȯ
ͧ›™ȯ¡ȡ_•ȡ™š€šȯ¡Ǖ™ȯ‡Ȱ ȯȰ ȯ€š€ȯ”Ǖͧ› €˜[…ȡšȣ™Ȫ€ȧ‡ȡ“–…ȡ_@ȡƒȡ™›
˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“Ȫ€Ȫͩ€ Ȣ ȡ’“€ȡĤ–Ȳ’€š€ȯ˜Ȱ“ȯ¡è”ȡ›ͧ—‡ȡ™ȡ@^ ƒŠ“ȡ˜ȯͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ”“
€Ǖ˜ȡšHC žȰšͧ Ȳ¡SI ‘ȯȯÛġPSI \ǽŽHGH Ǔ“š‡“0 112/GGM , HGH ‚Ǖš ȯ2128/FTB €Ȫ
–¡Ǖϙȡ‘ȡ…ȪŠȯ]_@HGH ‚Ǖš ȯ€Ȫ‚à—Ȣš…ȪŠȯ¡Ȫ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ ȡ˜ȡۙ¡è”ȡ› Ȫ¡“ȡ‚ǕǽĒȡ˜
˜ȯ—ȸ€šȡ™ȡ‚™ȡȡ˜Ȱ\ۙ ȡȢ”Ǖͧ› €˜[…ȡšȣ™Ȫ€ȯ ȡȯ‘ȡۏȡ¡è”ȡ›‚ǕǽĒȡ˜˜ȯ—ȸ
¡Ǖ]@˜ǕȲˆȯ”ȡ…›ȡ¡Ȱͩ€“Ǘȱ¡\“ȡ‡˜ÖŒȢ‚ȯŠ€ȯ ȡ˜“ȯ¡Ǖ_ƒŠ“ȡ€ȯ à–Ȳ’˜ȯ›‚Ȣ…ȪŠȪ€ȯ
€ȡšŽHGH Ǔ“š‡“0 112/GGM HGH ‚Ǖš ȯ“0 2128/FTB €ȧ˜ǙיǗ¡Ȫ‚_¡Ȱ@¡˜ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ–Ǖšȣ
š¡¢ǓĒ¡Ȫ€š˜ȫ€ȡ”š¥ŒȢ¡Ȱ@‡Ȫ“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜`”ġȢ™Ȫ€ȯͨ›ȡ• É ȯ É
€ȡ“Ǘ“Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ€ȧ‡ȡȯ@SD- AJAY MALIK DT 01.08.23
€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ”Ǖͧ› – ]‡˜“SI ¡ȡǔ‡šȡ“ȡ¡ǗȱMHC ȡ“ȡ“ȯ Ǘ…“ȡ‘ȣ€ȧ‡Ȫ€›Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€
31.07.2023€Ȫȡ“ȡ ȡ_–šȡ“ȡ“Ǘȱ¡\“ȡ‡˜ÖŒȢ‚ȯŠ“Ǘȱ¡€ȯ”ȡ “Ǘȱ¡€ȯ€ȡ•ȧ›Ȫ‚Ȫ“ȯ^€͢ȡ
¡Ȫ€š‚ǕǽĒȡ˜”Ǖͧ› ”š¡˜›ȡͩ€™ȡȡ@‡Ȫƒȡ™›¡Ǖ™ȯȯ˜ȯ‘ȡۏȡ¡Ȫǔ蔊›‚ǕǽĒȡ˜‘ȡͨ›
¡Ȱ@€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ€ȯͧ›™ȯ˜ȯ‘ȡۏȡ¡Ȫǔ蔊›”¡Ǖ…ȯ@‡Ȫ Ǘ…“ȡ”ȡ€š˜“SI ˜™CT  Ǖ—ȡ“ȡȱ322“Ǘȱ¡
€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ€ȯͧ›™ȯȯ‘ȡۏȡ¡Ȫǔ蔊›‚ǕǽĒȡ˜”¡Ǖ…ȡȱ@‡¡ȡȱ”šĤ–Û’€\• šȯŒ€ȧ’ȫ›ȡ¡ȡǔ‡š
ͧ˜›ȡ¡Ȱ@ǔ‡ “ȯ˜“SI €Ȫ`”šȪȏޙȡ“\Ȳͩ€€šȡ™ȯȡŒȰŒǽȀȡĤȡ܏ͩ€™ȡ@HGH Ǔ“š‡
ȡHGH ‚Ǖǽ ȯ€ȡDEAD ǽȀȡȡƒȡ™›Ȫ€ȧMLC ˜ȯ‘ȡۏȡ¡Ȫǔ蔊› ȯĤȡ܏€ȧ@`”šȪȏޙȡ“
 ȯȡMLC €ȯޙȡ“\Úὓ ȯȡŒȰŒǽȀȡ ȯ šȯ‘菠Ǖš‡Ǖ˜[‡ȯš
147,148,149,186,342,332,353,307,302,379B,427,120B IPC 25.54.59 A.ACT €ȡ¡Ȫ“ȡ”ȡ™ȡ‡ȡ“ȯ”š
›ȯͧ›€š–šȡ™ȯ€šȡ“ȯ\ͧ—™Ȫ‚\Ȳͩ€–ȡ‘èͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ Ǖ—ȡ“ȡȱ322“Ǘȱ¡€Ȫȡ“ȡ”š—ȯ‡ȡ‡ȡ
š¡ȡ¡Ȱ“0”…ȡ[ ȯ Ǘͬ…€šȯ@è”Ȱž›ǐš”ȪŠ[\• šȡ“–ȡ›ȡ“ȡ_›ȡ€ȡ˜Ȱǔ‡èĚȰŠ€Ȫ—ȯ‡Ȣ‡ȡ™ȯ@
I/O SI SURJEET
D/O SI BHARAT

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:47:18 5/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.

€ȧ‚™Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ…ǗȲͩ€`”šȪȏ‡ȡ“€ȡšȣ ȯ”ȡ…›ȡ¡Ȱͩ€\”šȡ’€š“ȯ€ȡšȣ€ȡ
˜‘ Ȳ˜Ʌ`ã›ȯ’ȡšȡ€ȯ¡¡Ȱ
(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation
Ĥ€šŽ‘‡[ͩ€™ȡ‚™ȡkš‡ȡȲ…€ȯ
Rank
”‘SI (Sub-Inspector)
ͧ›fͧ›™ȡ‚™ȡor ( ™ȡ
(2) Directed (Name of I.O.)
‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ“ȡ˜
SURJEET SINGH

No.
 Ȳ428GGN to take up the Investigation
€Ȫ‡ȡȲ…\”“ȯ”ȡ ˜Ʌ›ȯ“ȯ€ȯ
ͧ›fǓ“‘ȶžǑ‘™ȡ‚™ȡor
™ȡ

Directed (Mobile No. of I.O.)

‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ˜Ȫ–ȡ^›“Ȳ–š

(3) Refused investigation due to

‡ȡȲ…€ȯͧ›for
€ȯ€ȡšŽ^Ȳ€ȡšͩ€™ȡ
District
ǔ«›ȡ
™ȡ
(4) Transferred to P.S.
ȡ“ȡ

on point of jurisdiction
€Ȫ¢ȯğȡͬ’€ȡš€ȯ
€ȡšŽ¡èȡȲǐš

F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded

and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost.
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȪĤȡͧ˜€ȧ”±€š Ǖ“ȡ_‚™Ȣ ¡ȣ‘‡[¡Ǖ_˜ȡ“ȡkšf€€Ȩ”ȢǓ“žǕã€
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[€Ȫ‘ȣ‚™Ȣ

R.O.A.C.
]šjf Ȣ

14. Signature of Officer in charge, Police

Station
ȡ“ȡĤ—ȡšȣ€ȯ¡èȡ¢š

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:47:18 6/7
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

Name
“ȡ˜Ombir
Signature / Thumb
impression
of the complainant / Rank
”‘I (Inspector)
informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȯ¡èȡ¢š\Ȳ‚Ǘ‹ȯ No.
 Ȳ
€ȡǓ“žȡ“

15. Date and time of dispatch to the court

\‘ȡ›˜ɅĤȯŸŽ€ȧǑ‘“ȡȲ€

kš ˜™

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:47:18 7/7
 Annexure 7
HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

1. District
ǔ«›ȡNUH P.S.
ȡ“ȡCITY NUH Year
Ÿ[

FIR No.
Ĥ Ǘǐš Ȳ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€


2. S.No. Acts
\ͬ’Ǔ“™˜ Sections
’ȡšȡ
fȱ

Đ Ȳ
1 IPC 1860 148
2 IPC 1860 149
3 IPC 1860 435
4 IPC 1860 307
5 ARMS ACT, 1959 25

3. (a) Occurrence of offence

\”šȡ’€ȧƒŠ“ȡ

1 Day
Ǒ‘“Monday Date from
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ ȯ Date To
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€€
 

Time Period
 ˜™\ͬ’Pahar 5 Time From
 ˜™ ȯ Time To
 ˜™€
hrs hrs

(b) Information received at P.S.

ȡ“ȡ‡¡ȡȲ Date
Ǒ‘“ȡȲ€ Time
 ˜™
 Ǘ…“ȡĤȡ܏¡Ǖ_  hrs
(c) General Diary Reference Entry No.
Ĥͪǔ犠Ȳ Time
 ˜™

šȪ‡“ȡ˜…ȡ Ȳ‘—[
 
hrs

4. Type of Information
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡĤ€ȡšWritten

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:47:59 1/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

5. Place of Occurrence

ƒŠ“ȡ萛

1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S.

ȡ“ȡ ȯ‘ǗšȣkšǑ‘žȡNORTH-EAST, 1 Beat No.
–ȢŠ Ȳ
Km(s)
(b) Address
”ȡNEAR OLD BUS STAND NUH,

(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of P.S.
™Ǒ‘ȡ“ȡ Ȣ˜ȡ€ȯ–ȡ¡š¡ȰȪȡ“ȡ
€ȡ“ȡ˜

District (State)
ǔ‡›ȡ
šȡϙ

6. Complainant / Informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[
(a) Name
“ȡ˜Šȯ€…Ȳ‘
(b) Father's Name
ͪ”ȡ€ȡ“ȡ˜ĮȢƒ“æ™ȡ˜‘ȡ 
(c) Date/Year of Birth
‡Û˜ǓͬŸ[ (d) Nationality
šȡçĚȣ™ȡINDIA

(e) UID No.
™Ǘ]_ŒȢ Ȳ
(f) Passport No.
”ȡ ”ȪŠ[ Ȳ

Date of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȧǓͬ Place of Issue
‡ȡšȣ€š“ȯ€ȡèȡ“

(g) Occupation
噝 ȡ™
(h) Address

”ȡ
S.No. Address Type
”ȡ€ȡ Address
”ȡ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš
1 Present Address ĤȪ ȯ  [š“‡ȡšĦȡȲ…“Ǘ¡CITY NUH, NUH,
HARYANA, INDIA

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:48:00 2/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

2 Permanent Address ĤȪ ȯ  [š“‡ȡšĦȡȲ…“Ǘ¡CITY NUH, NUH,

HARYANA, INDIA
(i) Phone number
‘Ǘš—ȡŸ Ȳ Mobile
˜Ȫ–ȡ^› Ȳ


7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars

£ȡ ȲǑ‘Ê’\£ȡ
\ͧ—™Ǖȏ€ȡ”ǗšȯͪšŽ Ǒ¡Ž[“

S. No. Name
“ȡ˜ Alias
`”“ȡ˜ Relative's Name
ǐšæȯ‘ȡš€ȡ“ȡ˜

Đ Ȳ

8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant

ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[ Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[ɮȡšȡ
ǐš”ȪŠ[‘ȯšȣ ȯ‘‡[€šȡ“ȯ€ȯ€ȡšŽ

9. Particulars of properties of interest

 Ȳ–ǔے à”ǔ׏€ȡ
ͪšŽ
S. No. Property Type
 à”ǔ׏€ȯSub Type
`”Ĥ€ȡš Value(In Rs/-)
˜Ǘã™
ǽ

Đ Ȳ
Ĥ€ȡš ˜Ʌ

10. Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-)

…Ȫšȣ¡Ǖ_ à”ǔ׏€ȡ€Ǖ›˜Ǘã™
ǽ˜Ʌ

11. Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any

˜ǙיǕ ˜Ȣ¢ȡǐš”ȪŠ[™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ™Ǒ‘€Ȫ_¡Ȫ

S. No. UIDB Number

™ǗLŒȢLĤ€šŽ Ȳ

Đ Ȳ

12. First Information contents

Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡØ™

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:48:00 3/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

 ȯȡ˜ȯĮȢ˜ȡ“‡Ȣȡ“ȡĤ–Ȳ’€˜¡Ȫ‘™ž¡š“Ǘ¡ȲǓ“ȯ‘“¡Ȱͩ€˜ɇŠȯ€…Ȳ‘”ǕğĮȢƒ“æ™ȡ˜
‘ȡ ˜ȡ““Ȣ™ۙȡ™›™“Ǘ¡Ȳ˜ȯ–ȪšĤȪ ȯ  [š€ȡ™[š¡ǗȲ‡ȪǑ‘“ȡȲ€31.07.23 ˜™€šȣ–01–‡ȯ
‘Ȫ”¡š€ȡ¡Ȫ‚ȡͩ€˜Ȱȡ˜ȯšȯ ȡ˜ȯšȯ\ͬ’€ȡšȣĮȢ˜Ǔ\Ȳ‡›ȣ‡Ȱ“˜ȡ““Ȣ™f0 Ȣ0‡ȯ0f˜0“Ǘ¡Ȳ
`“€ȧȢ“ ȡ›€ȧ–ȯŠȣ\Ǔ“[€ȡ‚“˜Ȱ“_0f…‘ Ȣ0ͧ ™ȡšȡ˜–ȯ㊓0. 677“Ǘ¡Ȳ‚ȡŒȢ˜ȯ
 ȡš¡ȯ€šf 0€ȯ0f˜0˜ȯͫŒ€›€ȡ›ȯ‡“ã¡Œ‘ȡ›ȯ“ȯ€ȯͧ›f‚fȯ@¡˜‚ȡŒȢ“0.
DL14C0599ȪÈ Ȫ‚ȯ“”Ȫ›Ȫ‡Ȫۙȡ™’Ȣž˜¡Ȫ‘½ĮȢ˜Ǔ\Ȳ‡›ȣ‡Ȱ“€ȯ“ȡ˜”š¡Ȱ˜Ʌ ȡš
¡Ȫ€š€šȣ–2–‡ȯf 0f…0€ȯ0fȲ˜0˜ȯͫŒ€›€ȡ›ȯ‡“ã¡Œ ȯ‘ȡ›ȯ€š]š¡ȯȯ@‡–¡˜
–Ȳ’“–ɇ€“‡‘ȣ€”Ǖšȡ“ȡ– \ɬŒȡǑ‘ã›ȣ\›ššȪŒ”š”¡ǕȲ…ȯȪ¡ȡȲ\…ȡ“€ ȯ100/150›Ȫ‚Ȫ
€ȧ—ȢŒ^Ȋ‹ȡ¡Ȫ‚™Ȣǔ‡Û¡Ȫ“ȯ\…ȡ“€”šȡ]‚‡“ȢžǕǾ€š‘ȣ@‘ȯȯ¡ȣ‘ȯȯf€
”אš¡˜ȡšȣ‚ȡŒȢ€ȯ”Ȣ†ȯȡ›ȯžȢžȯ˜ȯ]€š›‚ȡkš‚Ȫͧ›™Ȫ…›“ȯ›‚Ȣ@‡Ȫ¡ȡ›ȡ€ȯ‘ȯȯ
¡Ǖf¡˜ —Ȣ`”šȪȏ\”“Ȣ‡ȡ“–…ȡ“ȯ€ȯͧ›f”Ǖšȡ“ȡ– \ɬŒȡ€ȯ€[žȡ”˜ȯǓ†”‚f@‡Ȫ–ȡ‘
˜ȯ¡˜ȯۙȡ™›™€ȯ\ͬ’×ȡj€ȧ˜‘‘ ȯ¡ȡȲ ȯǓ“€ȡ›ȡ‚™ȡ@‡–¡˜“ȯ\‚›ȯǑ‘“˜ȫ€ȯ”š
‡ȡ€š‘ȯȡȪ‡‡ ȡ¡–€ȧ‚ȡŒȢ ȡšȣ‡›…Ǖ€ȧȢ@‡“ȡ– ȯĤȡ[“ȡ¡Ȱͩ€\£ȡ›Ȫ‚Ȫ€ȯ
ͨ›ȡ• É ȯ É€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ€ȧ‡ȡȯ@SD-ĤȡȸŠȯ€…Ȳ‘”ǕğĮȢƒ“æ™ȡ˜‘ȡ ĤȪ ȯ 
 [š“‡ȡšĦȡȲ…“Ǘ¡Ȳ9991022664\‡ȡ“ȡ^  ˜™f€ͧ›ͨ‘šȡ菘Ǖ‘_Šȯ€…Û‘”Ǖğ
ĮȢƒ“æ™ȡ˜‘ȡ ĤȪ Ȱ  [š“‡ȡšĦȡȲ…“Ǘȱ¡˜Ȫ“9991022664–šͨ›ȡ•“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜
100/150å™ǔȏȡ¡‘š€ȡ“Ï‘ȣ€”Ǖšȡ“ȡ– èŠȯŒ“Ǘȱ¡–ȡ–Ǒ‘“ȡ€31.07.2023€Ȫ ˜™€ǐš–
01–‡ȯ‘Ȫ”¡š“ȡ˜”ȡ“ȡ˜ȡ›Ǖ˜100/150å™ǔȏ™Ȫɮȡšȡ¡˜˜žšȡ¡Ȫ€š_Š”אš›ȡ‹ȤŒȲŒȡ
\Ȱ’¡ͬ™ȡš ȯ›ȯž¡Ȫ€š˜Ǖ‘_ȡ˜Ǖ‘_€ȯ ȡȢ˜Ǖ›ȡ‡˜ȡ“”š‡ȡ“›ȯȡ¡˜›ȡ€š“ȯȡ‚ȡŒȢ
DL 14 C 0599€ȪȪŒ•ȪŒ€š€ȯ]‚›‚ȡ“ȯ–ȡšȯ–ȡ‡Ǖ˜[‡Ȱš’ȡšȡ148,149,435, 307,IPC 25-54-59
ARMS ACT –ȡšȯ¡šȣš–‘èͧ ”ȡ¡ȣ Ǖ–ȡ“ȡ“322“Ǘȱ¡ɮȡšȡȡ“ȡ”šĤȡ܏¡Ȫ“ȯ”š€ȡ™˜Ȣ
˜Ǖ€‘˜ȡ“258Ǒ‘“ȡ€01.08.2023’ȡšȡ148,149,435, 307,IPC 25-54-59 ARMS ACT ȡ“ȡž¡š“Ǘȱ¡
‘‡[šǔ‡0ͩ€™ȡ‡ȡ€šFIR ͩ€Ĥ‚ȡȲšĤǓ™ȡ€àܙǗŠšɮȡšȡȰ™ȡš€š€ȯè”Ȱž›ǐš”ȪŠ[è”Ȱž›SPO
\¡›€ȡš184ɮȡšȡ_›ȡ€ȡ˜ǔ‡èĚȯŠ ȡ¡–“Ǘȱ¡ȡ`ͅ\ͬ’€ȡǐš™Ȫͩ€ ȯȡ˜ȯ—ȯ‡Ȣ‡ȡš¡ȣ¡Ȱ
I/O ASI HARVINDER
D/O SI BHARAT SINGH

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:48:00 4/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.

€ȧ‚™Ȣ€ȡ™[ȡ¡ȣ…ǗȲͩ€`”šȪȏ‡ȡ“€ȡšȣ ȯ”ȡ…›ȡ¡Ȱͩ€\”šȡ’€š“ȯ€ȡšȣ€ȡ
˜‘ Ȳ˜Ʌ`ã›ȯ’ȡšȡ€ȯ¡¡Ȱ
(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation
Ĥ€šŽ‘‡[ͩ€™ȡ‚™ȡkš‡ȡȲ…€ȯ
Rank
”‘SI (Sub-Inspector)
ͧ›fͧ›™ȡ‚™ȡor ( ™ȡ
(2) Directed (Name of I.O.)
‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ“ȡ˜
BHARAT SINGH

No.
 Ȳ39MWT to take up the Investigation
€Ȫ‡ȡȲ…\”“ȯ”ȡ ˜Ʌ›ȯ“ȯ€ȯ
ͧ›fǓ“‘ȶžǑ‘™ȡ‚™ȡor
™ȡ

Directed (Mobile No. of I.O.)

‡ȡȲ…\ͬ’€ȡšȣ€ȡ˜Ȫ–ȡ^›“Ȳ–š

(3) Refused investigation due to

‡ȡȲ…€ȯͧ›for
€ȯ€ȡšŽ^Ȳ€ȡšͩ€™ȡ
District
ǔ«›ȡ
™ȡ
(4) Transferred to P.S.
ȡ“ȡ

on point of jurisdiction
€Ȫ¢ȯğȡͬ’€ȡš€ȯ
€ȡšŽ¡èȡȲǐš
F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded
and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost.
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȪĤȡͧ˜€ȧ”±€š Ǖ“ȡ_‚™Ȣ ¡ȣ‘‡[¡Ǖ_˜ȡ“ȡkšf€€Ȩ”ȢǓ“žǕã€
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[€Ȫ‘ȣ‚™Ȣ

R.O.A.C.
]šjf Ȣ

14. Signature of Officer in charge, Police

Station
ȡ“ȡĤ—ȡšȣ€ȯ¡èȡ¢š

Name
“ȡ˜Ombir

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:48:00 5/6
 HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES
¡ǐš™ȡŽȡ”Ǖͧ› “ȡ‚ǐš€ ȯȡ
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
Ĥ˜ Ǘ…“ȡǐš”ȪŠ[

’ȡšȡ‘ȲŒĤͩЙȡ Ǒ¡Ȳȡ€ȯ¡

Signature / Thumb Rank

”‘I (Inspector)
impression
of the complainant / No.
 Ȳ
informant
ͧž€ȡ™€ȡ[
 Ǘ…“ȡ€ȡ[€ȯ¡èȡ¢š\Ȳ‚Ǘ‹ȯ
€ȡǓ“žȡ“

15. Date and time of dispatch to the court

\‘ȡ›˜ɅĤȯŸŽ€ȧǑ‘“ȡȲ€

kš ˜™

System IP
]_”Ȣ 01/08/2023 20:48:00 6/6