Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IMCA D 077 - Guidance On Prevention and Mitigation of Lost Bell Emergencies - Rev. 0 May 2023
IMCA D 077 - Guidance On Prevention and Mitigation of Lost Bell Emergencies - Rev. 0 May 2023
IMCA D 077 - Guidance On Prevention and Mitigation of Lost Bell Emergencies - Rev. 0 May 2023
IMCA D 077
May 2023
The International Marine Contractors Association (IMCA) is the international trade association representing offshore marine
contractors, service companies, energy companies, and the industry’s supply chain.
Our mission is to improve performance in the marine contracting industry. For over 25 years IMCA has maintained an important
body of knowledge to assist our industry in the form of published documents promoting good practice across a wide range of
technical and professional disciplines. Documents have a self-explanatory title and are catalogued using a code containing letters
and numbers. The letter indicates the discipline, and the number is sequential within the discipline.
Members are expected to adopt the contents of the IMCA technical library as a minimum standard in accordance with our document
designation and grading system, see https://www.imca-int.com/publications/
Legal Notice
IMCA’s store terms and conditions are available at https://www.imca-int.com/legal-notices/terms/ and apply to all downloads
from IMCA’s website, including this document.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in the documents it publishes, but IMCA shall
not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained. The information contained in this
document does not fulfil or replace any individual’s or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their
operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
IMCA D 077
Document designation: this document is categorised as Recommended Practice.
Feedback – If you have any comments on this document, please email us: feedback@imca-int.com
1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1
2 Aims...........................................................................................................................2
3 Application.................................................................................................................3
4 The Prevention of Lost Bell Diving Incidents ................................................................4
4.1 Diving Bells and Bell Launch and Recovery Systems – Fitness for Purpose........................ 4
4.2 Primary Hazard ................................................................................................................... 4
4.3 Moonpool and Cursor Hazards ........................................................................................... 5
5 The Mitigation of Lost Bell Diving Incidents ................................................................6
5.1 Emergency Procedures and Preparedness ......................................................................... 6
5.2 Emergency Isolation of Gas Circuits in the Event of a Ruptured Bell Umbilical ............... 10
5.3 Emergency Location of a Lost Diving Bell ......................................................................... 13
5.4 Through-Water Communications ..................................................................................... 14
5.5 Bell Ballast Release Systems and Buoyant Ascent ............................................................ 15
5.6 Lost Bell Survival ............................................................................................................... 17
6 References ............................................................................................................... 24
Appendix 1 – Bell Mounted Acoustic Transponder Specification ...................................... 25
Appendix 2 – Diver Operated Interrogator/Receiver ........................................................ 26
Appendix 3 – Bell Emergency Communication ................................................................. 27
Appendix 4 – Bell Ballast Release Systems ....................................................................... 28
1 Introduction
A closed diving bell is any compression chamber which is capable of being manned and is used or
designed for use under the surface of water in supporting human life at a pressure greater than
atmospheric pressure during normal operation.
A potential risk when using closed diving bells is that the diving bell and its divers cannot be recovered
from depth to the surface, either because the main lift wire, secondary lift wire(s) and main umbilical
are severed, or because the bell is trapped. Such an incident is referred to as a ‘lost bell’ if supplies of
breathing gas or heating from the surface are lost.
It is recognised that a lost bell diving incident is a rare occurrence, but one which is life-threatening for
the divers. Previous lost bell incidents have indeed proved fatal.
There have been no documented lost bell incidents in recent years and very few recorded ‘near
misses’. However, there is no room for complacency as any lost bell diving incident has the potential
to cause multiple fatalities. The most pressing threats to the lives of divers in a lost bell are severe
hypothermia and the risk of carbon dioxide poisoning. It should also be noted that bell diving in warm
areas of the world may introduce problems with hyperthermia, which also need addressing.
All closed diving bells need to be capable of sustaining the lives of trapped divers for at least 24 hours.
This document collates material previously contained in a number of AODC and IMCA documents to
provide updated guidance on the prevention and mitigation of lost bell diving incidents.
The advice given in this document applies to all closed bell diving operations.
This guidance is intended to apply internationally, but it is recognised that some countries will have
legislation that requires different standards or practices to be followed. Where local or national laws
are more stringent than the advice contained herein, they will always take precedence over this
guidance.
4.1 Diving Bells and Bell Launch and Recovery Systems – Fitness for Purpose
Diving bells should be well insulated against the water and ‘cooling bridges’ (i.e., areas
of non-insulated steel and other materials with high temperature conductivity) should
be minimised.
Diving contractors undertaking saturation diving in very hot areas of the world should
ensure that the risk of bell occupants suffering from hyperthermia is estimated and
mitigated if necessary.
The principal method of preventing lost bell incidents is to ensure that bell launch and
recovery systems (LARS), including the wire ropes, are suitably designed and built, and
that they remain fit-for-purpose and safe-to-use in operation.
All of the equipment comprising the bell launch and recovery system should be
included in a company planned maintenance system and serviced in accordance with
the manufacturers’ recommendations.
The primary hazard to be considered when performing manned diving intervention from a DP
DSV is that in the event of a DP incident involving a loss of position in the ‘blow-on’/ ‘drift-on’
position, the DSV could drift across the mooring catenary and cause a lost diving bell incident.
Underwater obstructions include subsea structures, anchor cables etc. Provision for dealing
with subsea obstructions should be in place for all diving operations, and any such obstructions
that might impinge on the safety of the divers should be mapped in dive control.
During diving operations, it is vitally important to minimise the risk of the diving bell wires and
main umbilical coming into contact with underwater obstructions which may cause them
damage or sever them completely. Failure to do so could result in a lost diving bell incident.
Dive planning and risk assessments should consider the risk of damage to bell wires, or more
likely bell umbilicals, by contact with the cursor or edge of the moonpool. This can occur during
bell transits or while the bell is deployed. Cursor design and build should recognise the
potential for sharp angles of steel work to chaff/abrade/cut bell umbilicals while subsea
currents displace the umbilical in the cursor or while the vessel moves. Midwater currents
may be of greater velocity or differing directions to that experienced by the divers at the
seabed, so while the current is workable on the bottom, higher up the water column the bell
umbilical could be moving in such a way as to damage it against the vessel/cursor.
Despite all efforts at prevention, a lost diving bell incident may still occur. Observance of the guidance
on equipment design and emergency contingency planning contained within this document should
lessen the harmful consequences of such an event.
All saturation diving projects must have documented emergency contingency plans, which
include lost bell contingency procedures that have been developed through a site-specific risk
assessment.
These plans/procedures should include details of the equipment and personnel required to
locate a lost diving bell and rescue the occupants in circumstances where:
the stricken bell is still attached to its handling system, but is severed from its main lift
wire and/or umbilical; or
the diving bell has become completely detached from the surface and is lost in open water.
The plan should identify the roles and responsibilities of all key stakeholders, and define the
provision of specific equipment, such as locators (see section 5.3).
All closed bell diving operations must have provision for deploying a surface standby diver in
an emergency unless a robust alternative plan has been developed to ensure assistance can
be rapidly given to a stricken or fouled bell at all depths. These procedures have to be proven
through exercises, and particular emphasis should be placed on the phases where the bell is
close to or inside the moon pool.
All personnel must be fully familiarised with the equipment and procedures relevant to their
roles and responsibilities, including marine crew, and this should be drilled regularly.
Relevant sections of the procedures must be provided in the bell and require suitable
protection against moisture or damage.
The emergency procedures should address, but not be restricted to the following.
The pressure of all onboard gas (both oxygen and heliox) must be reduced to a
maximum of 30 bar over ambient before it enters the bell interior.”
The connections should be located at a centralised position with clear access and
should be clearly identified with suitable bright colour/glow paint markings.
Provision should be made for adjustment of the bell pressure where necessary during
an emergency.
Diving bells may be fitted with ROV intervention quick connect fittings and it is
recommended that each quick connect should be of different size to prevent incorrect
connections from being made (see also section 5.1.11.1). Further guidance is available
in NORSOK U-100 Manned Underwater Operations.
Documented verification of compatibility through trial fit up to the bell and the dive
control panel should be available. The emergency umbilical should be a minimum of
1.5 times the length of the planned working depth of the bell and should meet all the
requirements under IMCA D 018 Detail Sheet 28 and IMCA D 024, section 7 Main Bell
Umbilical.
“A copy of the AODC/IMCA bell tapping code must be mounted on the outside of the
bell in a clearly visible position.
IMCA guidance recommends that for bell diving systems there must be:
a primary means of recovering the diving bell to the surface, bringing it on board
and mating it to the chamber system; and
a secondary means of recovering the diving bell to the surface and bringing it on
board in order to mate it to the chamber system that is independent of the main
recovery system.
The primary method is normally by means of the main lift wire and main bell winch.
The secondary method is normally by means of the secondary lift wire and secondary
winch.
The criteria governing the status of the secondary recovery system are fully addressed
in IMCA D 024, section 4 Bell Launch and Recovery System.
In a lost bell situation where the main lift wire, secondary lift wire(s) and main
umbilical have been severed, the primary and secondary means of recovering the
diving bell to the surface, bringing it on board and mating it to the chamber system
will not be available. Tertiary recovery provisions should be in place for safe
emergency retrieval of the bell occupants to a surface compression chamber even if
the primary and secondary means of recovery have failed. This may be achieved, for
example, by through-water transfer of the divers to another diving bell or by
connection of emergency lift wires to the lost bell by ROV or rescue divers.
The use of a bell ballast release systems to enable the buoyant ascent of a
closed diving bell is generally regarded as the least desirable option available
for the safe recovery of a lost diving bell (see section 5.5 for detailed
guidance). Emergency procedures should consider all other available means
of bell or diver recovery in preference to the use of a bell ballast release
system. For example, by through-water transfer of the divers to another
diving bell or by connection of emergency lift wires to the lost bell by ROV or
rescue divers.
Diving Bell
Provision should be made for disconnecting the bell wire and guide wires in the
event that this becomes necessary. Wire-cutters are one such provision.
When working at an intermediate depth, consideration should be given to the
operating position of the door so as to prevent flooding of the bell in the event of
an uncontrolled descent.
Dive Control
An up-to-date photographic record and/or drawings should be available of the
diving bell clearly indicating its features. In the event of an emergency, these
records should be made available to whoever is in charge of the rescue.
Bell internal emergency procedures should include precise instructions for the divers,
and these should be regularly drilled by every diver.
More information and guidance on lost bell survival may be found in section 5.6.
5.2 Emergency Isolation of Gas Circuits in the Event of a Ruptured Bell Umbilical
The industry has long considered how best to maintain/re-establish the pressure integrity
inside a diving bell following the sudden rupturing of the main bell umbilical.
Investigations of past incidents involving the rupture of bell main umbilicals have emphasised
the following:
1) there is likely to be an ingress of water if the external door is not closed;
[Castellate door if applicable or ensure external door is closed during launch and recovery.]
2) pressure loss can cause misting inside a bell and an attendant significant reduction in
visibility;
3) occupants often fail to shut off valves on some circuits (even when visibility inside the bell
remains adequate).
[Ensure critical valves are illuminated and equipment does not impede the diver’s ability to
close the valves in an emergency.]
In 1982 the UK Department of Energy issued Diving Safety Memorandum No. 8. The
Memorandum contained the following text:
“In order to improve diver safety when surface umbilicals are ruptured, the
following actions should be taken:
Wherever reasonably practicable, all gases and hot water circuits to diving bells
should be fitted with a type of non-return valve (non-return valve, flow fuse,
deadman handle, etc.) in addition to a hull integrity valve.”
In 2013 an incident occurred on a modern diving support vessel (DSV) where a diving
bell suffered two uncontrolled descents whilst being lowered into the moon pool. The
bell umbilical was damaged during the second descent causing a loss of 18 metres
from an initial bell depth of 110 metres. It took approximately eleven minutes to close
all the internal valves and thankfully there were no injuries to the three divers.
Primary justification:
− An overloaded main bell umbilical is likely to break at the bell when the
Chinese finger breaks.
− Strain will be transferred to the skin valves and as the lines tighten vital
equipment such as external piping, valves, hull stops, etc. may be damaged.
− As the strain increases it is most likely that the external skin valve fittings
themselves will break at the thread terminations.
− Bell onboard gas hard-pipe small bore lines on the outside of the bell will also
be at risk in an umbilical overload situation. This could render onboard gas
supplies useless to the divers in the bell and at the same time create additional
gas leakage conduits.
3) Flow fuses on large bore lines proved their worth during the incident and were
critical for slowing the loss of the bell internal depth. The flow fuses should be
placed at the back of the umbilical termination panel as this is where they are least
likely to be damaged. If the bell is not fitted with an umbilical termination the flow
fuses should be internal to the bell.
4) Drills and training sessions for ruptured bell umbilical scenarios should consider
small bore valves and pipes inside the bell as well as larger pipework. Where
practicable, small bore lines without non-return valves or flow fuses should be
grouped together and illuminated.
The early recommendations made by the AODC still stand but, in view of the lessons
learned from the above incident, this guidance makes the following additional
recommendations:
1) It is recommended that, so far as is reasonably practicable, all main bell umbilical
lines should terminate at a sturdy umbilical termination panel.
2) The routing of the bell umbilical from the termination plate to the attachment
point of the Chinese finger should be arranged to ensure that any subsequent
tightening of the umbilical will not endanger vital equipment such as external
piping, valves, hull stops, etc.
3) Flow fuses on all large bore gas pressurisation lines should be placed at the back
of the umbilical termination panel. If the bell is not fitted with a strong umbilical
termination panel any flow fuses should be internal to the bell.
4) Divers and surface crew should understand that rupturing of the bell umbilical on
or near the surface is a critical emergency situation.
5) Wherever possible, small bore lines without non-return valves should be grouped
together inside the bell and illuminated.
6) Placement and grouping of bell internal and external valves should be subject to
an ergonomic assessment and best practice should be observed when designing
the layout of pipework and valve positioning.
For all bell diving operations those in control must have the capability of locating a lost diving
bell with the minimum of delay.
The master of a DSV may also have other means of assisting in the search for a lost diving bell
at his disposal. For example:
by use of the vessel’s ROV – the vehicle’s sonar may be capable of picking up the bell from
a considerable distance; and
by conducting transponder array interrogations.
Vessels fitted with acoustic position monitoring should consider fitting a suitable secondary
transponder to the bell.
Specifications for the Bell Mounted Acoustic Transponder and Diver Operated
Interrogator/Receiver are attached at Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 respectively.
It is important that equipment made available for the emergency location of a lost closed bell
is included in company planned maintenance systems and regularly serviced in accordance
with the manufacturers’ recommendations.
All diving bells must be equipped with through-water communications to permit voice
communications with/from the diving supervisor in case of failure of the hard wire
communication system, for example during a lost bell emergency when the main bell umbilical
has been severed.
It is necessary to ensure that the through-water communications system is functional for all
diving operations.
A function check should be carried out following every submersion of the bell and prior
to diver lock-out and diving operations should not proceed if communications cannot
be established.
In a lost bell situation where the main lift wire, secondary lift wire(s) and main umbilical have
been severed, a bell equipped with a bell ballast release system could be made buoyant, and
ascend through the water column to the surface, if the divers inside the bell choose to operate
the ballast weight release mechanism.
Buoyant ascent of the bell is generally regarded as the least desirable option available for the
safe recovery of a lost diving bell (see section 5.5.1). Emergency procedures should consider
all other available means of bell or diver recovery in preference to releasing the ballast.
For example, by through-water transfer of the divers to another diving bell or by connection
of emergency lift wires to the lost bell by ROV or rescue divers.
Careful consideration should be given to the use of ballast release systems on diving
bells, taking the following problems into account:
1) Any failure of ballast release mechanisms and/or inadvertent release of ballast
weights could have very serious consequences, and these have resulted in diver
fatalities.
2) Bell ballast release systems add considerable weight to diving bells which can
cause buoyancy and handling issues. For example, it may be necessary to add
compensating buoyancy to allow the bell to float when the release system is
operated. The fitting of additional buoyancy to the bell may also result in the bell
becoming only weakly negatively buoyant – perhaps preventing it from sinking at
a safe and comfortable rate during normal operations. In addition, the extra
weight in air of any additional buoyancy will mean that extra loads are imposed
on bell handling systems.
3) In order for the ballast release to be performed successfully, certain conditions
must be established. For example, it would be essential to check that:
− the bell’s ascent will not be impeded or prevented by the proximity of debris
and associated lifting equipment (such as severed wires, umbilical etc.) and its
path to the surface will be free from obstructions;
− surface craft are cleared from the rescue area and an agreed time is specified
before the bell starts the ascent. This is particularly important in the event of
communications failure;
− there is pressure integrity inside the bell;
− there is a safe procedure for attaching a lift wire and recovering the bell once
on the surface.
It is likely that many other factors will also have to be taken into account.
In view of the above, reliance on buoyant ascent as a means of rescue is not normally
considered necessary:
when operating with a two-bell system;
in areas where diving support vessels are available and capable of providing rescue
by through-water transfer within the survival time of the bell;
where ROV assistance is available, in which case this should be incorporated into
the rescue contingency plan with engineered and tested solutions for connection
of emergency lift wires and umbilical services.
The decision on whether or not to use ballast release systems must take full
consideration of all relevant factors. Where operational considerations require that
buoyant ascent is to be used as a means of diver recovery, the guidance in section
5.5.2 on the design and configuration of bell ballast release systems should be
followed.
Where the decision is taken that a ballast release system will not be used as a method
of emergency recovery, it must be clearly documented and communicated clearly at
the work site. The emergency procedures must identify the alternative method
chosen (for example, by through-water transfer of the divers to another diving bell or
by connection of emergency lift wires to the lost bell by ROV or rescue divers). The
competent person will be required to carry out sufficient testing to ensure the
integrity of the weights and their support structures, but no testing will be required of
any release mechanisms. The weights themselves should be affixed in such a way that
they cannot come off accidentally or be released. All ballast release operating systems
should be removed or rendered inoperable. All certification issued should be
endorsed by the competent person clearly stating that the ballast release mechanism
is not operable. A notice to this effect should also be securely and conspicuously fixed
inside the bell.
The philosophy of ‘free ascent’ of a bell relies upon the ballast release system
(together with all other associated systems such as umbilical, main lift wire, and
secondary lift wires, etc.), being completely releasable. However, the design of the
bell ballast release system should be such that no single failure can result in the loss
of the ballast.
Full details of the requirements for the initial and periodic examination, testing and
certification of bell ballast release systems are attached at Appendix 4.
The categories of competent person appropriate to carry out examination, test and
certification of equipment are defined in IMCA D 018 – Code of Practice for the Initial
and Periodic Examination, Testing and Certification of Diving Plant and Equipment. A
summary of the requirements for the initial and periodic examination, testing and
certification of bell ballast release systems is also included in IMCA D 018 as Detail
Sheet 30 Bell Ballast Release Systems.
Requirements for bell ballast release systems are also included in IMCA D 024, section
5 Diving Bell.
5.5.4 Maintenance
When ballast release systems are considered to be part of the emergency procedures
then the contractor should ensure that all divers are familiar with their operation.
As noted in the introduction to this document the most pressing threats to the lives of divers
in a lost bell are:
the risk of carbon dioxide (CO2) poisoning; and
the loss of thermal balance. Usually severe hypothermia is the concern, although in some
parts of the world hyperthermia may be an issue.
Oxygen depletion is also a serious problem that must be considered, and so IMCA D 024,
section 5 Diving Bell requires that:
“Sufficient oxygen must be available for metabolic consumption by the maximum number
of divers at 0.5 litres/minute per diver for at least 24 hours at the end of a bell run.”
The overall aim for diving contractors is to ensure that all closed diving bells are capable of
sustaining the lives of trapped divers for at least 24 hours.
1 Much of the information and guidance in this section is based on material from IMCA D 059 – Diver Emergency Heating Report (1984) and
IMCA D 017 – Lost Bell Survival: Trainers’ Guide.
The thermal conductivity of helium is six times that of air, and when diving in cold
waters it is logical that gas temperatures inside a stranded diving bell will decrease
rapidly if the bell is cut off from all external sources of heating.
This fact was tragically confirmed in the late 1970s and early 1980s when two lost bell
incidents in the North Sea (typical water temperature of 4°C to 6°C) caused the deaths
through hypothermia of a total of four divers. In two other incidents four divers
survived lost bell incidents but experienced severe hypothermia during the two to ten
hours they spent inside unheated diving bells before being rescued.
These incidents prompted the industry and regulatory authorities to take action.
Research and development (R&D) projects were initiated and the following strategies
for combating heat loss during lost bell emergencies were identified:
1) Improve the overall insulation of diving bells to reduce the rate of cooling inside
lost bells.
2) Insulate the trapped divers individually, and so minimise their personal heat loss
‘passively’, i.e., without heating the ambient atmosphere inside the bell or the
divers themselves.
3) Use active emergency heating systems inside the lost bell, i.e., devices which
generate heat. These can be used to keep the ambient internal atmosphere of the
diving bell at a suitable temperature or to keep the divers themselves warm.
Evaluations of survival systems kept in diving bells over several years of operation have
concluded that insulation material, and other parts of the systems, may show
deterioration, even when properly vacuum-packed. Repeated compression and
vacuum packing are a likely explanation for the observed reduction in the thermal
properties of the insulation materials used in such survival systems.
Manned verification dives and unmanned simulations show that survival time in a lost
bell at depths shallower than 180 msw should exceed a minimum of 24 hours without
the need for active heating systems provided passive survival systems are:
of an acceptable standard (see reference 5);
properly inspected and maintained;
kept undamaged; and
used correctly by the divers.
For depths deeper than 180 msw the use of passive survival systems may be
insufficient to ensure survival for 24 hours and systems with active heating are
required. These systems are coupled with passive individual insulation systems and
have heating wires forming an integral part of the thermal insulation suit/bag. Power
for this type of system is supplied from the bell emergency batteries.
The aim is for the divers to be able to assist with their own rescue, for example by
making a wet transfer, or at least be in a condition where rewarming in the bell can be
performed safely.
If a diver’s core temperature drops below 34°C their mental condition will be affected,
and they are unlikely to be able to respond effectively to the emergency. Once the
core temperature falls below 31-32°C, the diver’s own metabolic heat production
(mainly generated through shivering) is insufficient to regain a normal and safe
thermal status. It is critical that divers activate the means to preserve body heat as
soon as possible and for as long as possible. At a core temperature of 30°C or lower
the risk of unconsciousness is very high.
Rescue time will depend on the nature of the emergency and the time required to
mobilise rescue facilities. For example, a rescue team operating from a second diving
bell on the DSV will be substantially quicker than a support DSV. These factors should
be considered during the planning of the diving operation. The chances of survival will
be greatly enhanced if the diving contractor has provided the equipment, the
maintenance systems, the procedures and the training recommended.
Receptors on the body surface detect low temperatures and provide an important
early trigger to the brain to initiate shivering and increased heat production. Shivering
is an important response to reduce the rate of heat loss. In the heliox environment at
pressure a lot of the body heat is lost through the respiratory tract, which does not
trigger the shivering response. Heat is lost from the body core without the diver being
aware of it until central thermal sensors are activated. The diver may feel relatively
comfortable, but the slow drain of heat from his body could be the start of a life-
threatening situation.
If the bell is warm at the time when contact with the surface is lost, several hours will
pass before the bell gas cools close to the temperature of the surrounding seawater.
This will result in a significant respiratory heat loss for divers who breathe in the
increasingly cold gas without any means of heating it.
To minimise respiratory heat loss and to remove excess CO2, the survival equipment
needs to include:
a thermal regenerator unit which acts as a small heat exchanger (the unit
conserves the heat of the diver’s expired gas and then uses this heat to pre-warm
the cold gas being inspired); combined with
a lung powered CO2 scrubber which removes the CO2 from the divers’ exhaled
breath and uses the exothermic reaction of the chemicals to heat the inspired gas.
The rate of heat transfer from a diver’s body to the environment inside the bell is by
convection and conduction. Both can be reduced by increasing the thermal resistance
of the garments worn by the diver, and by providing insulation between the diver, the
cold gas environment, and the cold hull of the bell.
Harnesses are normally included as an integral part of the thermal insulation bags.
They are used to attach the insulated divers to suitable securing points. Harnesses
should support the divers in an upright sitting position even when asleep or possibly
unconscious, and thereby prevent them from falling across the access door to the bell
and hindering rescue.
It is important that divers recognise the need to take all possible steps to keep the
survival bag dry.
Sanitary bags, including urine collection systems suitable for the divers to use when
inside their thermal bags, will need to be available.
It will be difficult for divers to put on the equipment due to restricted space and it is
essential that the divers work as a team as this will allow them to unpack and don the
emergency equipment properly.
To avoid a hazardous increase in CO2 levels, the bell scrubber should be run until the
divers are settled inside their survival systems. The thermal regenerator units should
be put on as soon as possible, mainly to preserve body heat and reduce CO2 levels.
Generic procedures for divers involved in a lost bell emergency are outlined below and
in the IMCA D 017 – Lost bell survival video.
IMCA D 018 – Code of Practice for the Initial and Periodic Examination,
Testing and Certification of Diving Plant and Equipment contains guidance on
the examination, testing and certification of diving bell survival systems. The
following Detail Sheets are relevant:
Detail Sheet 21 – Diver Heating Systems
Detail Sheet 33 – Emergency Survival Packs and Passive Scrubbers
The importance of regular inspection for diving bell survival systems should
be emphasised to both maintenance and dive crews. It is essential that
survival insulation systems are inspected in accordance with an agreed
schedule for evidence of:
damage to the protective packaging e.g., broken zips, rips in the
packaging material; and
moisture within the thermal suits and bags, e.g., wet feel, mould. Ideally,
bags should be checked for dampness by using a dampmeter probe
inserted into the bag material through the zipper.
Diving bell survival systems will only be effective if they are maintained and
used correctly.
In addition, IMCA and the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have jointly produced
a video entitled ‘Lost bell survival’ and an accompanying ‘Trainers’ guide’ (IMCA D
017). Together the video and guide are designed to supplement in-house training for
dive teams, dive supervisors, life support technicians, maintenance personnel and
diving school trainees, in the use of the survival equipment provided in a diving bell or
welding habitat. The video and guide highlight the basic procedures which should be
followed by divers involved in a lost bell incident. Again, it is recommended that
persons reading this guidance document should also view the video ‘Lost bell survival’
and read the video’s accompanying ‘Trainers’ guide’ document.
A pressure housing capable of operating to at least 200 metres with pistol grip and compass. This is to
be compatible with the transponders available on all other diving bells.
Transmit pulse: 4 ms
Directivity: ± 15o
For use between the crew of a lost craft and rescue divers.
Note: This also includes lift wire, guide wire and umbilical release systems
When new, following a major refit or a material or design change which could affect the ballast
release system.
Category of
Competent
Examination/Test Person
In accordance with manufacturer’s specification and fit for the purpose it will be used for 3 or 4
When in service:
Category of
Validity Competent
Examination/Test Period Person
Function test of all mechanisms to check that the weights will release. 6 months 2, 3 or 4
Overload test to 1.5 times the static load of the ballast weight in air which 12 months 3 or 4
will be imposed on the release system/structure and the ballast weight
itself (see Note 3), or whichever of the release/support systems is designed
to take the in air weight of the ballast. NDE carried out on all critical items.
Dry function test of all components and release mechanisms involved in 12 months 3 or 4
each stage of the process required to make the bell buoyant. Where fitted
this might typically include the following:
1. Release ballast and demonstrate separation of weights from the bell,
including consideration of drop weight separation if bell resting on
bottom (weights should not be allowed to fall – see Note 4).
2. Release bell lift wire.
3. Release guide wire.
4. Release umbilical (see Note 5).
5. Visually check that retractable arrangements such as pins (if used) are
free of any defects which could prevent retraction with the system
under load.
Test bell positive buoyancy and confirm this is in line with original 12 months 3 or 4
requirement.
Test positive bell buoyancy using the following criteria:
1. The water should be of a known Specific Gravity.
2. The total weight of the bell assembly and occupants should include:
• the weight of a standard equipped bell
• 150 Kg per fully equipped diver, including umbilicals
• allowance for flooded bottom trunking
• allowance for tools
• allowance for special payload.