Science For All Publications

July 2023 Electronic Publications Self-publication Project

Vol: 1 Issue: 1 pp. 1-17 References Number (SFAP 230711/2)

Local Ownership and Community-Based Approaches to Peace Building

Mohammed B. E. Saaida
Department of International Relations and Diplomacy, Faculty of Administration Sciences
and Informatics, Al-Istiqlal University, Jericho – Palestine.
Email: confador@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7488-9832

Abstract:

This article explores the significance of local ownership and community-based approaches

in the context of peace building. It highlights the importance of empowering communities

and involving them in decision-making processes to foster sustainable peace. The article

examines various strategies and initiatives that promote local ownership, emphasizing the

role of community engagement, dialogue, and capacity building. By delving into case

studies and relevant literature, this article demonstrates the potential of community-based

approaches in achieving lasting peace and stability.

Keywords: Peace Building, Peace Making. Education, Local Ownership, Initiatives.

Introduction:

Peace building processes are complex and multifaceted, requiring comprehensive strategies

that address the root causes of conflict. Local ownership and community-based approaches

have gained recognition as essential components of successful peace building efforts.

These approaches prioritize the involvement of affected communities, empowering them to

shape and drive the peace building process. By fostering inclusivity and leveraging local

knowledge, expertise, and resources, community-based approaches hold the potential to

)1(
build sustainable peace from within. This article examines the key principles and practices

that underpin local ownership and community-based approaches to peace building.

Enhancing Local Agency:

Community-based approaches recognize the importance of local agency, acknowledging

that communities possess valuable knowledge, insights, and perspectives on their own

needs, aspirations, and dynamics. Rather than imposing top-down solutions, these

approaches prioritize empowering communities to actively participate in decision-making

processes related to peace building initiatives. By involving local actors, such as

community leaders, grassroots organizations, and affected individuals, peace building

efforts become more responsive and context-specific.

When communities have the opportunity to shape and drive the peace building process, it

promotes a sense of ownership and responsibility. It allows them to identify the underlying

causes of conflict and devise tailored strategies for resolution and reconciliation. Local

agency ensures that interventions are rooted in the specific social, cultural, and political

contexts of the community, avoiding generic and ineffective approaches.

By actively engaging communities, peace builders can tap into local knowledge, expertise,

and resources. This not only increases the effectiveness and sustainability of peace building

initiatives but also strengthens the social fabric and cohesion within communities.

Ultimately, enhancing local agency empowers communities to become agents of change,

fostering a sense of ownership and accountability in building a peaceful future.

Participatory Decision-Making:

Participatory decision-making lies at the core of community-based approaches to peace

building, recognizing that sustainable peace requires the active involvement of local actors.

)2(
These approaches emphasize the importance of inclusive and participatory processes that

engage all relevant stakeholders, including marginalized groups and women.

By involving a wide range of perspectives, participatory decision-making ensures that the

needs, concerns, and aspirations of different community members are taken into account. It

creates a space for dialogue, negotiation, and consensus-building, allowing conflicting

parties to find common ground and collectively address underlying tensions. Through this

inclusive approach, community-based peace building initiatives gain legitimacy and

acceptance within the community.

Furthermore, participatory decision-making mechanisms foster a sense of ownership and

empowerment among community members. By actively involving them in shaping the

strategies and actions of peace building, it enhances their commitment and responsibility

towards sustaining peace in the long term.

Inclusivity in decision-making processes also contributes to the comprehensive addressing

of conflicts. It brings forth diverse perspectives and insights, allowing for a more holistic

understanding of the complex dynamics at play. This, in turn, facilitates the development of

context-specific solutions that are better aligned with the community's unique needs and

circumstances.

By prioritizing participatory decision-making, community-based approaches enable

communities to be active agents in their own peace building processes. It strengthens social

cohesion, fosters trust, and promotes a sense of collective ownership over the pursuit of

peace.

)3(
Dialogue and Reconciliation:

Dialogue and reconciliation are key elements of community-based peace building,

recognizing that open and inclusive communication is essential for fostering understanding,

reconciliation, and healing within conflict-affected communities. By creating spaces that

encourage dialogue, community-based approaches provide opportunities for conflicting

parties to engage in constructive conversations.

Through dialogue, individuals and groups involved in the conflict can express their

grievances, concerns, and perspectives in a safe and respectful environment. This process

allows for the exploration of shared interests, identification of common ground, and

building empathy among participants. By actively listening and acknowledging each other's

experiences, dialogue helps bridge divides and promotes the development of trust.

Furthermore, dialogue facilitates the process of reconciliation by providing a platform for

addressing historical injustices, acknowledging harm, and seeking forgiveness. It allows

individuals and communities to confront the legacy of the conflict, promote healing, and

work towards a shared future.

In community-based peace building, dialogue goes beyond mere communication; it aims to

generate understanding, empathy, and mutual respect among conflicting parties. By

involving diverse stakeholders, including marginalized groups, women, and youth,

dialogue becomes a tool for inclusivity and empowerment, ensuring that all voices are

heard and considered.

Through sustained dialogue, conflicting parties can develop shared visions and strategies

for peaceful coexistence. This collaborative process enables the identification of common

)4(
goals and the formulation of joint initiatives that contribute to lasting peace within the

community.

Overall, dialogue plays a vital role in community-based peace buildingby creating spaces

for open and inclusive communication, fostering trust, promoting reconciliation, and

building a foundation for peaceful coexistence.

Conflict Prevention and Early Warning:

Conflict prevention and early warning systems are critical components of community-

based approaches to peace building, as they empower local communities to proactively

address conflicts and identify potential sources of tension. Local ownership enables

communities to take ownership of their own security and well-being, allowing them to

implement preventive measures to avoid escalation.

Community-based approaches emphasize the importance of conflict analysis, where local

actors assess the underlying causes and dynamics of conflicts within their communities.

This analysis helps in identifying early warning signs, such as social tensions, economic

disparities, or political grievances. By understanding the root causes, communities can

intervene at an early stage to prevent conflicts from escalating.

Establishing early warning systems is another crucial aspect of community-based peace

building. Local actors can develop mechanisms to monitor and detect indicators of

potential conflicts, enabling timely and targeted responses. These systems may include

community-based reporting mechanisms, dialogue platforms, or the involvement of trusted

mediators and community leaders.

Preventive measures implemented through community-based approaches may include

peace education programs, community dialogues, conflict resolution training, and

)5(
addressing structural factors contributing to conflicts. By addressing root causes and

mitigating tensions, communities can work towards preventing conflicts from occurring or

escalating into violence.

Through local ownership and proactive engagement, communities become agents of

change in their own peace building processes. They are better positioned to understand the

nuances of their contexts, build trust, and develop tailored strategies to prevent conflicts.

Community-based approaches foster resilience and empower communities to take

collective action in creating peaceful and harmonious environments.

Community-Led Development:

Community-led development lies at the core of community-based peace building,

recognizing the agency and potential of local communities to drive their own development

processes. It emphasizes the empowerment of communities by strengthening local

institutions, enhancing capacities, and supporting grassroots initiatives.

By promoting community-led development, community-based peace

buildingacknowledges that sustainable peace is intimately connected to socio-economic

development. It recognizes that communities themselves are best positioned to identify

their needs, priorities, and aspirations. Through capacity building and strengthening local

institutions, communities gain the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to lead their

own development processes.

Community-led development fosters a sense of ownership and responsibility among

community members, as they actively participate in decision-making, resource allocation,

and project implementation. This engagement not only enhances the effectiveness and

)6(
sustainability of development initiatives but also contributes to the building of social

cohesion and trust within the community.

By supporting grassroots initiatives, community-led development harnesses local

knowledge, innovation, and resources. It taps into the strengths and assets of the

community, allowing for context-specific solutions and approaches that address the root

causes of conflict. This bottom-up approach ensures that development efforts align with the

unique needs, culture, and aspirations of the community.

Community-led development not only empowers communities but also promotes

inclusivity and social justice. It emphasizes the active participation of marginalized groups,

women, and youth, ensuring their voices are heard and their needs are addressed. This

fosters a more equitable and inclusive society, contributing to long-term peace and

stability.

Ultimately, community-led development in the context of community-based peace building

recognizes that sustainable peace is not solely achieved through external interventions but

through the active engagement and empowerment of local communities. It enables

communities to become architects of their own development, leading to more resilient, self-

reliant, and peaceful societies.

Truth and Reconciliation Initiatives:

Truth and reconciliation initiatives are fundamental components of community-based

peacebuilding, as they provide spaces for affected communities to address past grievances,

confront historical injustices, and foster collective healing. These initiatives play a crucial

role in achieving long-term peace by addressing the root causes of conflicts.

)7(
Community-based approaches recognize the significance of truth-telling and

acknowledgment of past wrongs in the process of reconciliation. Truth and reconciliation

mechanisms provide platforms for individuals and communities to share their experiences,

express their pain, and have their voices heard. By openly acknowledging the injustices

committed, these initiatives promote understanding and empathy among conflicting parties.

Moreover, truth and reconciliation processes contribute to the restoration of dignity and the

rebuilding of trust within communities. They provide opportunities for dialogue,

forgiveness, and the recognition of victims' rights. By allowing individuals to share their

stories and have their suffering acknowledged, these initiatives promote a sense of closure

and facilitate the healing process.

Addressing historical injustices through truth and reconciliation mechanisms is crucial for

sustainable peace. By examining the root causes and structural factors that perpetuated

conflicts, communities can collectively work towards preventing the recurrence of

violence. This deeper understanding of the past contributes to the establishment of more

just and inclusive societies.

Furthermore, truth and reconciliation initiatives promote societal transformation by

challenging impunity and promoting accountability. They create opportunities for

reparations, legal reforms, and institutional changes to ensure that the mistakes of the past

are not repeated. By addressing systemic injustices, these initiatives contribute to the

building of more resilient and peaceful communities.

Incorporating truth and reconciliation mechanisms within community-based approaches

acknowledges the importance of collective healing and the restoration of relationships

within affected communities. By providing spaces for truth-telling, acknowledgement, and

)8(
redress, these initiatives contribute to the resolution of conflicts at their core, paving the

way for sustainable peace and reconciliation.

Local Economic Empowerment:

Local economic empowerment is a vital aspect of community-based peacebuilding,

recognizing the significant influence of socio-economic factors on achieving sustainable

peace. Community-based approaches prioritize strategies that promote economic

opportunities, skills development, and entrepreneurship within conflict-affected

communities.

By fostering local economic empowerment, these approaches aim to enhance resilience and

reduce the vulnerabilities that often contribute to conflicts. They prioritize initiatives that

create livelihood opportunities, such as vocational training programs, microfinance

schemes, and support for small-scale businesses. By providing individuals with the means

to support themselves and their families, local economic empowerment helps reduce the

desperation and frustration that can fuel conflicts.

Skills training and capacity-building programs are also integral to local economic

empowerment. By equipping community members with marketable skills, they gain access

to better employment opportunities, higher incomes, and improved livelihoods. This not

only improves individual well-being but also strengthens the overall socio-economic fabric

of the community.

Promoting entrepreneurship is another crucial aspect of local economic empowerment. By

encouraging individuals to start and sustain their own businesses, community-based

approaches foster economic independence, self-reliance, and economic diversification.

)9(
Entrepreneurial activities contribute to job creation, stimulate local economies, and reduce

dependence on external assistance.

Moreover, local economic empowerment initiatives address underlying inequalities and

promote social cohesion within communities. By providing equal access to economic

resources and opportunities, these approaches reduce disparities and enhance social justice.

This fosters a sense of inclusivity, cooperation, and shared prosperity, ultimately

strengthening the social fabric and promoting peaceful coexistence.

By prioritizing local economic empowerment, community-based peace building approaches

create the conditions for sustainable peace. They recognize the interconnection between

economic well-being and peace, and they actively work towards building resilient, self-

sufficient, and economically vibrant communities. By addressing socio-economic factors,

these initiatives contribute to long-term stability, social cohesion, and peace building

outcomes.

Traditional and Indigenous Approaches:

Community-based peace building acknowledges and respects the value of traditional and

indigenous approaches in fostering sustainable peace. It recognizes that traditional

knowledge systems, practices, and customs hold deep-rooted wisdom that can contribute to

the process of reconciliation and peace building.

Incorporating traditional and indigenous approaches means recognizing and engaging with

the cultural heritage and identity of a community. It involves incorporating traditional

conflict resolution mechanisms, such as mediation, traditional justice systems, or

community dialogues guided by cultural norms and values.

)10(
By incorporating traditional practices, community-based peace building efforts can rebuild

the social fabric within communities. Traditional approaches often emphasize collective

decision-making, inclusivity, and harmony. They promote the restoration of relationships

and healing by addressing not only the immediate conflict but also the underlying causes

and historical factors that contribute to tensions.

Additionally, by incorporating customary laws, community-based peace building

recognizes the legitimacy and relevance of indigenous legal systems. Customary laws can

provide a sense of justice and reconciliation that resonates deeply within the community,

contributing to the reestablishment of trust and the rebuilding of social cohesion.

Integrating traditional and indigenous approaches strengthens cultural resilience and

identity. It fosters a sense of ownership and collective responsibility for peace building

efforts, as community members see their cultural heritage valued and respected. This, in

turn, reinforces the sustainability of peace building outcomes and promotes the overall

well-being of the community.

By embracing traditional and indigenous approaches, community-based peace building not

only draws from the richness of cultural diversity but also enhances the effectiveness of

interventions. It recognizes the importance of cultural context, local wisdom, and

community values in the pursuit of lasting peace.

Collaboration with Local Civil Society:

Collaboration with local civil society organizations is a cornerstone of community-based

peace building. Recognizing the vital role they play, community-based approaches actively

engage and partner with these organizations to enhance grassroots initiatives, foster

community engagement, and ensure the long-term sustainability of peace building efforts.

)11(
Local civil society organizations are deeply rooted within the community, possessing

valuable knowledge, networks, and expertise. Their close proximity to local realities

enables them to understand the nuanced dynamics of conflicts and peace building needs.

Collaborating with these organizations enhances the effectiveness and relevance of peace

building interventions, as they bring a deep understanding of local contexts, culture, and

community dynamics.

Partnerships with local civil society organizations foster community engagement by

providing platforms for dialogue, participation, and ownership. They amplify the voices of

marginalized groups, women, and youth, ensuring that their perspectives and needs are

integrated into peace building initiatives. By empowering local actors, collaboration

strengthens the legitimacy and acceptance of peace building efforts within the community.

Moreover, working in collaboration with local civil society organizations contributes to the

sustainability of peace building processes. These organizations have established networks,

relationships, and capacities that extend beyond external interventions. By building their

capacities and providing support, community-based approaches ensure that peace building

efforts continue even after external actors have phased out.

Collaboration with local civil society organizations also promotes local ownership,

enabling communities to take the lead in shaping their own peace building agendas. By

fostering partnerships based on trust, mutual respect, and shared objectives, community-

based approaches create a framework for collective action and sustainable peace building.

In summary, collaboration with local civil society organizations is integral to community-

based peace building. It harnesses local knowledge, expertise, and networks, empowering

communities and facilitating community engagement. By ensuring the sustainability of

)12(
peace building efforts, these partnerships strengthen grassroots initiatives and foster the

long-term well-being and resilience of communities.

Sustaining Peace through Education:

Education is a powerful tool for peace building, and community-based approaches

recognize its transformative potential. Prioritizing accessible and inclusive education

within these approaches promotes peace, tolerance, and conflict resolution skills, fostering

long-term peace and stability within communities.

Community-based peace building acknowledges the importance of education in addressing

the underlying causes of conflicts. By investing in education at the community level, these

approaches aim to address social divisions, prejudices, and misunderstandings that can fuel

conflicts. Accessible education ensures that all members of the community, including

marginalized groups and disadvantaged individuals, have equal opportunities to acquire

knowledge and skills.

Inclusive education within community-based approaches promotes diversity, empathy, and

understanding. It fosters an environment where different perspectives and identities are

respected and valued, cultivating a culture of peace and tolerance. Through inclusive

education, individuals develop the skills and attitudes necessary for constructive dialogue,

peaceful coexistence, and conflict resolution.

Investing in education at the community level also builds human capital and empowers

individuals. By equipping community members with education, they gain the tools to

actively participate in their own development and the well-being of their communities.

Education promotes critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and the capacity to

)13(
navigate complex social dynamics, strengthening resilience and fostering a sense of

agency.

Furthermore, education provides opportunities for individuals to overcome inequalities and

break cycles of violence. By promoting literacy, numeracy, and vocational skills, education

opens doors to better employment prospects and economic opportunities, reducing socio-

economic disparities that can contribute to conflicts.

By prioritizing education within community-based peace building, sustainable peace and

stability can be achieved. Education equips individuals with the knowledge, skills, and

values necessary to build peaceful societies and contribute to positive change. It empowers

individuals to become active agents of peace, fostering long-term transformation and

resilience within communities.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, local ownership and community-based approaches stand as crucial

frameworks for the achievement of sustainable peace. These approaches recognize the

inherent power within communities to drive their own peace building processes. By

empowering communities, encouraging inclusive participation, and utilizing local

knowledge and resources, these approaches foster resilience, social cohesion, and

reconciliation.

The significance of local ownership cannot be overstated. When communities are actively

engaged as primary agents of change, peace building efforts become more context-specific

and responsive to local needs and aspirations. By valuing the expertise and perspectives of

community members, the impact of interventions is enhanced, and sustainable peace

becomes more attainable.

)14(
Recognizing the importance of community-based approaches, it is imperative for peace

building actors and policymakers to prioritize the engagement and involvement of

communities. Meaningful participation, inclusive decision-making, and the utilization of

local resources contribute to the long-term effectiveness of peace building efforts.

Embracing community-based approaches holds the potential to build a more peaceful and

just world. By fostering local ownership, embracing diversity, and nurturing collaborative

partnerships, we can create environments where conflicts are transformed, social divisions

are healed, and sustainable peace thrives. It is through the collective efforts of

communities, peace buildingactors, and policymakers that we can work towards a future

characterized by peace, justice, and harmony.

References:

 Altiok, A., Porras, P., & Lee, P. (2023). Fostering Meaningful Youth Participation in

International Peacebuilding.

 Bar-On, D., & Adwan, S. (2020). The Prime Shared History Project: Peace-Building

under Fire. Israeli and Palestinian Collective Narratives in Conflict: A Tribute to Shifra

Sagy and Her Work, 235.

 Bräuchler, B. (2022). Creative Peacebuilding and Resistance in Indonesia. The Asia

Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 23(1), 1-19.

 Brigg, M., George, N., & Higgins, K. (2022). Making space for indigenous approaches

in the southwest pacific? The spatial politics of peace scholarship and practice. Journal

of Intervention and Statebuilding, 16(5), 545-562.

 Carmichael, L. (2023). Peacemaking and Peacebuilding in a Divided Society: South

Africa’s National Peace Accord in the Transition from Apartheid to Democracy. New

England Journal of Public Policy, 35(1), 3.

)15(
 Hachmann, S., Löhr, K., Morales-Muñoz, H., Eufemia, L., Sieber, S., & Bonatti, M.

(2023). Conceptualizing Community-based Environmental Peacebuilding in Cesar,

Colombia. Human Ecology, 1-15.

 Haider, H. (2009). Community-based approaches to peacebuilding in conflict-affected

and fragile contexts.

 Hancock, L. E. (2017). Agency & peacebuilding: the promise of local zones of peace.

Peacebuilding, 5(3), 255-269.

 Ide, T. (2020). The dark side of environmental peacebuilding. World Development,

127, 104777.

 Joseph, Y. J. Community Resilience and Peacebuilding Initiatives around Farmer-

Herder Conflicts in Yobe State, Nigeria.

 Kilmurray, A. (2023). 3 Community-Based peacebuilding: Signals for Track III. Track

III Actions: Transforming Protracted Political Conflicts from the Bottom-up, 33.

 Le Billon, P., Roa-García, M. C., & López-Granada, A. R. (2020). Territorial peace and

gold mining in Colombia: local peacebuilding, bottom-up development and the defence

of territories. Conflict, Security & Development, 20(3), 303-333.

 Lemay-Hébert, N., & Kappler, S. (2016). What attachment to peace? Exploring the

normative and material dimensions of local ownership in peacebuilding. Review of

international studies, 42(5), 895-914.

 Loha, W. (2023). Community-led Development: Perspectives and Approaches of Four

Member Organizations. Qeios.

 Masood Alavi, D., Wählisch, M., Irwin, C., & Konya, A. (2022). Using artificial

intelligence for peacebuilding. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 17(2), 239-

243.

)16(
 Meagher, K., Khaity, M., Hafez, S., Rodo, M., Achi, N. E., & Patel, P. (2023).

Strengthening health systems and peacebuilding through women’s leadership: a

qualitative study. Globalization and Health, 19(1), 1-18.

 Millawithanachchi, K. S. (2020). Peace Education and Truth and Reconciliation in Sri

Lanka: Assessing Policy Effectiveness as Panacea for Post-Conflict Reconstruction

(Doctoral dissertation, Howard University).

 Ndalira, D. W. (2023). Capacity-Building Strategies and Implications on Sustainable

Peace in Kenya: A Case of Local Peace Committees in Kibra Sub-County. Journal of

African Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(3), 68.

 Odallo, D. O., Onyango, R. S. R. D. E., Odhiambo, S., & Ochieng, M. O. Sustainable

Peacebuilding Opportunities: An Analysis of Sub-County Peacebuilding Committees In

Mombasa County.

 Reychler, L., & Paffenholz, T. (Eds.). (2001). Peacebuilding: a field guide. Lynne

Rienner Publishers.

 Richmond, O. P. (2012). Beyond local ownership in the architecture of international

peacebuilding. Ethnopolitics, 11(4), 354-375.

 Sila, M. A., & Fealy, G. (2022). Counterterrorism, Civil Society Organisations and

Peacebuilding: The Role of Non-State Actors in Deradicalisation in Bima, Indonesia.

The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 23(1), 97-117.

 Svensson, P. G., Mahoney, T. Q., & Hambrick, M. E. (2020). What does innovation

mean to nonprofit practitioners? International insights from development and peace-

building nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(2), 380-398.

 Ware, V. A., Lauterjung, J., & Harmer McSolvin, S. (2022). Arts-based adult learning

in peacebuilding: A potentially significant emerging area for development

practitioners?. The European Journal of Development Research, 34(2), 1050-1075.

)17(