Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AD0672988
AD0672988
AD0672988
By
ROY M. ENDLICH ROBERT L. MANCUSO
CONTRACT AF 19(628)-5173
PROJECT NO. 8624
TASK NO. 862402
WORK UNIT NO. 36240201
Final Report
June 1968
Prepared for
AIR FORCE CAMBRIDGE RESEkRCH LABORATORIES
OFFICE OF AEROSPACE RESEARCH
UNITEC S',ArES AIR FORCE
BEDFORD, MASSArHUSETTS 01730
-,r
• I. ,, -- I SFI--
. EW ,,
CFi -
ILI
;i r y
C DE
-
AFCRL-68-0337
By
ROY M. ENDLICH ROBERT L. MANCUSO
Final Report
Period Covered: 10 May 1965 through 9 June 1968
June 1968
Preparedfor
ABSTRACT
from standard rawinsonde data and were correlated with the turbulence
reports. The correlations show that the vertical vector wind ihear
corresponds most closely to turbulence frequency determined from the
pilot reports. Little additional reduction of variance in the turbulence
frequencies is achieved by including other meteorological factors. Op-
timum multiple regression equations between turbulence frequency and the
mean and standard deviation of the vertical vector wind shear were ob-
tained. In summer a different regression equation was found than in
other seasons.
iii •
iv
CONTENTS
If DATA SOURCES....................... 3
V÷
ILLUSTRATIONS
vii
A.
TABLES
The purpose of this study was to develop methods for estimating the
probability that an aircraft will encounter turbulent air at a given
locality, altitude, and time of year. The discussion pertains to clear-
bulence frequencies on certain days were computed from reports .)f tur-
climatology.
the turbulenrc e imatolt.x up t,1 the alt itude l 1 ,t c'f ball,,n flih
*
(approxiiately 100,000 feet) could be found, and correlations could be
made with meteorological factors at the same times and places. A
similar idea is involved in the use of rising uninstrumented balloons
in this report.
Among designers of aircraft and missiles, a strong interest in
turbulence hn,; existed for years (e.g., Loving, 1966; Houbolt, 1967).
The aeronautical profession has perfected complex aircraft instrumenta-
tion that gives information on turbulence spectra, probabilities of
gusts greater than certain threshold values, etc. Using this approach
to deteriaine the turbulence environment at new altitude leviels, such as
the stratosphere, requires that an aircraft of some sort be used as the
initial probe. Generally, the number of flights made is far too low to
papers are given at appropriate points. In Sec. II, the different data
sources that we used are described, and 'heir limitations are given.
Section III is entirely devoted to a description of our attempt to
)A
i
II DATA SOURCES
and also recorded concurrent winds and temperature) were carefully re-
Endlich and McLean (1965), McLean (1965), and Kao and Woods (1966).
We found that the turbulent gust intensity recorded by the B-47 corre-
lated best with vertical vector wind shear, with large directional wind
tween turbulent gust intensity and these quantities were in the range
from 0.5 to 0.8. The vertical and horizontal structure of the tempera-
meteorological data and subjective pilot reports, are much lower than
3)
Another possible source of information comes from balloons tracked by
FPS-16 radar. Flight tracks of Jimsphere balloons had been obtained by
NASA at Cape Kennedy, Florida (Scoggins, 1965), and 3f Rose balloons by
the Air Force at Vandenberg AFB, California, for use in measuring accu-
rate winds and vertical wind shears over small increments of height.
It was thought that if these data yielded information on turbulence,
they would augment other turbulence measurements, particularly in the
sult, a major effort was made to use the Rose series of flights from
Vandenberg for turbulence studies. For the stratospheric layers of
interest, this was not successful for reasons discussed further in
Sec. III. However, the basic concept of detecting turbulence from
erratic portions of the balloon path is still believed to be useful,
and might be implemented by procedural changes described in Sec. III.
j program was five days in length. Reporting periods were held in February
1963, December 1964, and March, June, and September 1965. These data
have the major advantage that they are numerous, and give a reasonably
good depiction of turbulence within the airspace over the United States
during these periods. For example, in the March 1965 data, there were
approximately 20,000 reports, each pertaining to a 100-mile flight seg-
ment. Turbulence of moderate intensity occurred in approximately six
percent of these, while severe turbulence occurred only in 0.3 percent
of the cases. The average wind patterns during this five-day period
from upper-air charts for this interval given by Endlich and Mancuso
(1967). The same is true of other five-day periods. Therefore, one
would not expect the pilot reports of turbulence for such brief periods
to be representative of seasonal conditions--i.e., they do not give an
4
reports to concurrent meteorological conditions, we wished to obtain
climatology.
each time period for each volume element. The concurrent meteorological
conditions (i.e., wind speed and direction, vertical v~ctor shear, tem-
by these data, but sources such as Steiner ( 1965) and Coy (1967) indicate
ten miles.
5
To use the pilot reports in obtaining regression equations for the
frequency of turbulence, a "climatology" of wind speeds, shears, etc.
at each grid point was constructed from ten values of each factor during
pensate for missing wind observations. The amount of missing data was
not presented, but as indicated below, must have been large. Further
Crutcher. They are for levels between 450 and 150 mb for the period
July 1948 through June 1958. The statistics are comprehensive, and
obviously excellently computed and organized. The number of observations
used is also given; no subjective interpolation was performed. In this
summer reached the 200-mb level. In winter at 200 mb, the corresponding
I
.14 4-
404
4. 0 N4
>$~4 04
00
'9.4
0
*0 W
.- 4 1- 0
-.- 4
w Q
E- tn -.I
as 0
zz L.-
~~ -
$t4
< > u
at 200 mb in summer and winter are 256 and 115, respectively, again out
of 900 possible. Thus the samples of measured winds and shears are
quite small. This in itself is not of overpowering importance; the
remaining samples might be representative. But from the nature of the
observational method, we know that wind data are lost most frequently
during conditions of high winds when elevation angles become too low
to permit accurate tracking. Thus the remaining wind sample is biased
towards low speeds, low shears, etc. In portraying the geographical
and latitudinal variation in these statistics over the United States,
the differing numbers of observations at radiosonde stations enter
into the picture. Although we have looked briefly into the possibility
of standardizing the statistics on the basis of the numbpr of observa-
tions that went into each, no simple correcting procedure appears
possible. In retrospect, one recalls that the present GMD-l type of
wind finding equipment was introduced at some stations in 1954, and at
most others in 1960. Thierefore, the number of observations obtained at
each station evidently depends in part on the date of installation of
this equipment.
This discussion of the observations that go into available statis-
tics of .pper winds and shears has been rather lengthy because of the
importance of this matter to the present problem. The reliability of
the averages and standard deviations of vertical vector shear (used
later in the regression equations) is difficult to judge, and may be
somewha* questionable for the present purpose. Typical patterns of
the magnitude of the average vertical wind shear and the standard
vector deviation of shear, as read at grid points from data at twenty-
five stations given by Schamach, are shown in the Appendix. A future
remedy appears to be the recomputation of such statistics using recent
data, although even today a significant number of winds are missed in
that can be taken to obtain more accurate winds and shears from present
equipment is a computer computation using all the data points measured
by the GMD-l (instead of certain points one or two minutes apart), as
discussed iy Danielsen and Duquet (1987).
An alternative type of climatological information might describe
the number of times certain subsynoptic features that favor turbalerice
(ruch as jet streams passing through sharp troughs and ridges, jet
lronts or tropopauses with strong wind shear, mountain waves, etc.)
occur as a function of geographical location and time. One would also
I
The wind shear data of Schamach are over 50-mb intervals tLjlow
2X0) mb, and then are from 200 to 175 mb, and 175 to 150 mb. Thus their
average thicknesses are variable, and we wished to normalize the 3hear
data to a -t000-foot thickness as used in analyzing the aircraft data.
A well known teature of wind shears is that average values and standard
L-.viations computed for thin I.-,ers tend to be larger than values coin-
putId over greater distance intervals (Dvoskin and Sissenwtne, 1958).
FaCtO,., zI-.lat ing shears over various intervals hl've been given by
Essenwanger (1963) and Arendariz and Rider (1966). From the latter
paper, we estimated correction factors of 0.5, 0.67, 1.0, and 1.3 for
layers 1000, 2000, 4000, and 6000 feet in thickness, respectively, and
4I
____--
__-- - -- ~ -
III TURBULENCE IDENTIFICATION FROM PATHS OF RISING BALLOONS
balloon flights had been made using two radirs located side by !kide to
obtain independent measurements of the balloon's coor.dinates versus
time. If radar tracking errors were small, plots f.-om the dual tracks
bulent layers.
Computer programs ,t-re writtet, "v, utilize ;i%? fPS-16 Rose data.
more than adequate for tne prer-ent purp,)sc, as the bail ooz
rises at• a rat•e •,f oniv4- to 5 .i sec -i . ) The *.i.e se-que-•ce
Ii
of points is then examined to isolate occasional spurious
deviations, but this was not done for reasons given below.
Plotted v'ilues oi (R - RS ) from the dual tracked flights were
to 1000 fcet in a'ltitude. In the low levels, the plots from the two
radars generally agreed well, and indicate self-induced balloon motions,
Such turbulence is shown in Fig. I for the interval from two to three
m'nutes after launch. uust speeds indicated by the slope of the graphs
arte 1 to 2 m sec" , signifying light turbulence. Other similar cases
appart. tlv verify the basic concept. But at longer ranges and low
elevat-:on angles, the curves of thc. two radars did not Keneratlly agret-
12
- - -- - T T - - - - --
10 METER DEVIATION
Ajý -
RADAR I
-vF
10 METER DEVIATION
ADRAA2
T-- T r -----
FiG. 2 4F
GRAPýS RANGE DE',,AT:ONS MEASURED BY T*O FPS- 16
RADARS TRAC'.NO A R.S+NG ROSE BALLOON ýN THE UPPER
TROFGSPERE T:-. • T.
Test 64_08 : zndenb4rg AFB, Calfo,,"o
44-0 45.0
suggesting turbulence. Close agreement was not found. A typical plot
in Fig. 1.--
It is our opinion that the difficulties are due to tracking uncer- i
Also, operational modes of the two radars may not have been optimum or
identical. Thirily, the balloon motion may be partly aerodynamic in
15
K _
IV REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING TURBULENCE FREQUENCY
TO METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS
wind speed and direction), vertical vector shear and its square, vertical
speed shear, temperature, lapse rate, and height. From the winds, vorti-
city, divergence, deformation, and horizontal shear along the flow and
across the flow were computed. The values of all these quantitics are,
were not used since we believe such terms contain an unacceptable level
of uncertainty.
each of the approximately 500 volume elements over the United States.
This climatology was computed from the ten values of turbulence fre-
less than twenty flights during the period; these were discarded. Indi-
vidual correlations of turbulence frequency with each meteorological
17
•.
quantity were determined for each period from approximately 450 values
of each variable. Thus the sample sizes are large. Also, a multiple
regression program (Gorfinkel, 1S67) was used to calculate the correla-
tion of variables with each other, the multiple correlation, and the
obtained from these data are considerably lower than those obtained
18
linear equation based on the mean and standard deviation of vector shear
gave a multiple correlation as high as when additional terms were used.
Magnitude of 1 Standard 1
p(M) = C(s) + 2.0 X raverage vertical - 0.5 l deviation of (1)
vector shear J Lvector shea:J
-3 -l
the brackets are 10 sec
where the units of vertical vector shear ir
5 in spring and fall. (These values are in accord with the average
turbulence frequencies for samples of data for different seasons.) This
Since climatological wind shear data are available only for the
United States and perhaps a few other industrialized countries, Eq. (1)
of mean winds and the standard vector deviation of winds are given in
various sources (such as Air Force Manual SACM 105-2) for the entire
to be highly correlated with each other, so that wind speed alone will
terns of strong winds over the United States given in SACM 105-2 compare
one would expect from the well known general association of turbulence
and jet streams. The rough correspondence of turbulence frequency and
average wind speed carn be seen by comparing Fig. 5(c) (see Sec. V) with
Fig. A-l(c), and Fig. 5(d) with Fig. A-l(f). Actually, the regions
19
Table II
2. Standard deviation
of vertical speed
shear 0.73 1.0 - -
3. Magnitude of average
vertical vector wind
shear - - 1.0 0.17 0.40 0.43
4. Standard deviation
of vector wind
shear - - 0.17 1.0 0,24 0.26
6. Standard deviation
of "I 0.59 - 0.43 0.26 0.88 1.0
United States is
p(M) = C(a) + 0.12 x [Average wind speed) (2)
20 4.
where the jet stream reaches maxihmum speeds. Howe./er, the use of wind
able to verify the present results with other summer data. As mentioned
previously, associations of tirbulence with meteorological quantities
* over tile United States in June are considerably different than in
winter. The mean position of maximum winds in summer is over the
Great Lakes, north of the main flight routes. The vertical wind shear
is generally much weaker than in winter. W a large degree the weather
disturbances over the United States are convective in nature. Much of
the convection occurs in areas where vertical shear in the upper tropo-
sphere is small. Even the turbulericte outside convective clouds and re-
Table Ill
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY OF MODERATE OR
SEVERE TURBULENCE (FROM PILOT REPORTS) AND CLIMATOLOGICAL
FACTORS, FOR JUNE 9-]-I, 1965*
0.38, is
21
-------------- i
r rJ
units m sec-1 -1
units m sec
in summer, and the standard deviation of wind were taken from Air Force
Manual SACM-105-2. Vorticity was computed from the mean winds. Typical
examples of these fields are shown in the App;ndix, in Fig. A-3. In
these summer data a diurnal effect was found, such that computed turbu-
lence frequencies at 00 GMT (evening) should be increased by 15 percent,
while at 12 GMT (morning) the probabilities should be decreased by the
same amounts.
C. Mountain Effects
22
I- t
14
00
00
-* 0 0 0,
00
23
winter and 1.15 in spring and fall. In summer, no such correction is
needed. It is known that the largest corrections should be made on the
clude mountain wave regions identified by Harrison and Sowa (1966) and
Foltz (1967). To account for wave activity in these areas, turbulence
frequencies, of Sec. V. should be multiplied by k,, taken as 1.6 in
winter and as 1.3 in spring and fall.
and ridges) are important for both. Thus, a simple correction of this
magnitude might be used in applying Eq. (1) to the oceans of mid-
regions.
it must be borne in mind also that the most comprehensive turbulence
data (from pilots) have been obtained in ar. altitude range restricted to
approximately 20,000 to 40,000 feet. At lower altitudes, the regression
equations might be applicable to the United States except for changes In
the constant values to accommcdate greater turbulence amounts due to the
24
____
____
_______
_____________.1--
frequency in the stratosphere, one is faced with the drastic reduction
in available information, as noted by Mitchell (1966). However, the
inversions than to the wind field appears dubious to us.) Due to the
apparent similarity to conditions lower down, it appears reasonable to
"q
2-i
V AN• ESTIMATED TURBULENCE CLIMATOLOGY FOR THE UNITED STATES
45
WINTER
40 SPRING
o •FALL
- -l
35
2-
2 3 4 5 6 , I 9 10
P[UC[NT TU bLEN" I'LIGHT
27
Zrequency (light, moderate, or severe) within 100-mile sectors, the
pilot reports show that p(T) = 3.Sp(M) in winter and spring, and
p(T) = 4.5p(M) in summer and fall. As discussed oy Endlich and Mancuso
and fall.
(3) To obtain p(m), the likelihood of encountering moderate or
severe turbulence at a given instant, divide p(M) by 5.
25,000,
These levels
28,000, 36,000, j
iI
28
40,000 and 43,000 feet respectively. No shear data were available at
the 275-mb (32,000-foot) level. Charts for winter are given in Figs.
5(a) through 5(f), for spring in Figs. 6(a) through 6(f), for 3ummer
in Figs. 7(a) through 7(f), and for fall in Figs. 8(a) through 8(f).
Figs. 5-8; this must be done by the reader for a particular locality.
They provide a rough basis for estimating the overall turbulence expo-
29
*W "&"__
t
I00 I0 I0 I0w:
I0W
1201w I0
110o. 190, W. 70w
7
501 - 6.
6 4 6.7? 67 6.6 6_..7 Lit.6 6.5 6.6 6.e8 .1-5o.N
. . 87
~6.,6 6.5 . 00 •]"':--.o_6.o9.
%
i
7. 7.
7.5 . 7.7
. 7.1
6,8 6.8
I I I I I
90* 0 70*W
120*W 1
00"
IN WNTER, AT 425 mb IN
TURBULENCE
FIG. 5(a) PROBABILITIES
ESTIMATEDSECTORS (percent)
THE UNITED ENCOUNTERING
OF STATES
OVER
I-
100-MILE
See Sec. V for an interpretation
(approx. 22,000 feet). Average percent turbulence = 7.0.
08
of these frequencies.
. 7.-- , .
s0* 81 81
'0eW 3 -
5.NA 120*W •
6 .6 II0e ?-
6.8 I00I 0
.D 90*
3 400N--
5.
(. 50 . 2
7.4 6 .7
50 9-
. 6. . . . -
6.2 6.1 6 0- 6 0 6.4
5.9,
8
7.1 8.5 8.1 7 8 .I - 4 0
6 .4 7. 7.1 7 .6
6 .6 6.9 6 .4
40 1- 5.
. . 64 . . .
4.1• 4.20 .7 6".1 .
so , 7 0* W
II 1
1 10 o
1I 60 0 * 9 0*
IN
(percent) OF
.4. ENCOUNTERING TURBULENCE
AT 375 mb
ESTIMATED PROBABILITIES STATES IN WINTER,
FIG. 5(b) OVER THE UNITED
100-MILE SECTORS
percent turbulence = 6.6.
(approx. 25,000 feet). Average
30
120 "w I10o 100 ° 90 " so, 70.w
51 6 i';-- I 6I 6 I ;' -
' 6 0'ý 6 6
5 9
5N- 4.2 5.1 6.1 6.4 6.2 " .6. 6.0 .•6.1 6.1 .1 5. 50N
5 5. 5.5
0
.3 6.9 6.7
0 °6 67
6.7 6.7 7. .2-- 6.7.
6 0
00
6.6 6.4 6.3 6.4 6.5 7.0 t.6 7.8 7.7 7.7 768 7.6
00
FIG. 5(c)
1201W i 1i0* ~ i
I00"
100-MILE28,000
SECTORS
feet). OVER
AverageTHE UNITED STATES
(approx. percent turbulance = 6.6.IN WINTER, AT 325 mb
3 3
3
2.0 2.1 2.5 2.9-3.5 3.1 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.1
31
"J
120*W 10° t00* 90 90 g. ?7O1w
4 3 3
50
5.j 4.3 57- 5. 4.4 4.4 3.8 3 41 3
04
4.3 4.7 5.5 U 5.4 5.7 4 2, . . 3.40 . 0
2 -
120*'* II
1 O0 I 100.¶\
II! I4 90* s0o 70w
4
4 1 3.11
5 _. 4., 4.1 4.1 4.5 3.6 3.1 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.5 - oN
4 28 38
40"--~
, 5.55/5, 58 R.7 2.8 2. .4 4.1 1 -40-
.4 -02.
2.7 3.3 4.0 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.6 4.9 3.0 1.3 1.2
32
I I
1
1200* I•
t.00 / too I1
so. 70,W
5
WI*N 5.9 4.7 4.5 4.9 4.2 4 .5 5.0 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.4 5. 0 -WON
0 4.
4.3 3.5 3.8 4.4 .2 5.7 6.,T-,, . 0., -. 6
5o.-
5.6 4.8 4.5 4.6 4.6 .4 6. 6 .4 0 6.2 6 6.7_,0.
.0 6
6 0 0 6 O
6.1 6.1 6.1 6.4 5.6 6.0 6.3 6.2 5.9 6.3 6.7 6.7
Wc.N- 6.5 7. 0 7. 6.7 6.2 6.3 6.70 6.9-- 6.7 ,6.5 6.5 6"2- 0
I7
12 0 "W
! 7
110
IOO"
tO
7 I71
90 ,
SI
s o ,? "
120V s0"
I to.
I I00"
lI ' 90"
I I '0w
I
33
'o•- • 5.9 5.3 5.0 4.8 4.1 4.8 5 5.6 5.4 5.0 5.8
5.8 6. 6-.-
50 \. 4.6 4. .2 4.7 X
5 4. . 3 4 002 5. 9 . 6.5 i 5. . .4 67 - o
62 . .
-0i 6.63 6. . .4 \. 9 6 6
00
100 80 7
120 ,0
3.7 46
'.,.8
57
1.4
72
I.jT i
85.9
7.0
70
2.3
7 2'
2.4u 2 .1
7..6
2.0
6.0
2.3
5.)
'.4
ý 2.3.2-6.4-2.! - ON
'X' - 2.5)
4 5 6
7 7 (6
4 6.2 .5
.6. G 6.3 4.9
555. . ... 2.5 2.7
7 .9 o "•
S.97.
.8>6.3 6.6
3.6. 43
I0 34
IZO*e 110. 100. so* go. 7 WC
I I 2ý 4 I 4 I O
5 I 4
,o-- 5.6 4.7 3.4 3.7 3.3 3. 3.4 4.3 4.2 \ .0 2.7 2.9 WON
0 0 4 - 5
0 5
2.6 3.2 4.4 5.1 4.1 3.6 3.7 3.8 3. 4.1 5.2 5
3.0
4
3
2.2 1.4 ,4.0
I.9 3.7 3 3.00 2.3- 2. 3.8 3.4 .3 -,0N.
44~ 3
2 "• 25+ 16 1
1A .2 2.5 2.9- 2-2 1. 1.7 2.3 2.2
1.4 1.2
I 2? I I
SI
O0 "* 90o so, 70 "*
.20*W 11O^
0r
4 2 3
-0 0 /
I/ 3
- 0/
35
1200W 110. o 00.
o TO-*070
4.0 5.6 5.0 5.1 5.4 5.6ý 5.1 1..4 455 4.6 5.61
5 /
5 4
f0-4.5 4.9 5. .0 5.7 5.4 .o 5.1 5.1 .5. 5.0- 5.6,.
4. .6 4. 6.7 63. 5.2 5.7 46.70 4.6 4.5 5.5 ý5.2 5.?
of theso frequencies.
I I I 1
5 4 4\' 4 3
~o- 5.7 5.6 '14.6 3.5 3.9 .41 4.1 4.3 4.3 3. 7 2.9 .- N
3
0 o 4
400 4.6 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.7 %.5 5.4 5.8 5.6 5.3 5.054_ .
0 6 o
36
Ito,* 0o to* W. ~ oW
55
6 0
_ ._ 4.3 .. 5. 2 4.3 4.9 4.4 46 4. 43
47
0 4-- _-
5.0
5.
5.•
S 5.3
4.9 00
65 I
0.
16 17 0.
1010
. 5.9$. . .. 4 4 .8 4.9 2.
FIG. 7(c) __ 22
ESTIMATED . .
PROBABILITIES 0. 1 49
(percent) OF 51 4
ENCCJNTER'NG TURBULENCE IN
100-MILE SECTORS OVER THE UNITED STATES IN SUMMER, AT 325 mb
(approx. 2t3,0(O feet). Average ptrcent turbulence 3
.. 1.
00
20OW ,'O
,0'00" 90" S0"O
2 t I 2y 2 !
54 . . 5.2~ 5. 50 4. C9 54 . 5. 54
2.7- 3.0 3. 3.o 2.6 2. .7o••. ,3
3,,4.0 4.3
5. ,. 3 49 39.0 37 . 3. .4. 4.0-0
T TURBULENCE IN
FIG. 7i() ESTIMATED PROBABILITIES (percent) OF ENCOJN ER'NG
'00-MILE SECTCRS OVER THE UNITED STATES IN SUMMER, AT 225 mb
(approx. 28,000 feet). Aver,-ag perc.nt turbu I oece 3.3.
37
*
'.4Z3 2.2 2. 5 . .4
.0
2.9 1. 3 2.24.5.
I 2.6
00
-ý1 3.4 3.0 3.1 4 0 4,2 4.5 40ý .6-3. 3.0 2.5 2. o
2 i II
.7 2.41 2 0. .? C ' - 2 I3 c.,..~.
1 1 14 18 1 5 14 1.5 . - - "
2,9.,
3i 343 4. 41 40 3' 30 13
4 4 2
38
in-if to. 1)0 ow so. ?0Yw
536 5 0
5O . \
4576 -55 0 C4
57 ' g0 5552 '
55
, 5-5
-4 ~~00
Ij so*" 5.5
55
,
I\,-!-
48
gn 5 4 Gi 63, 64-- 6 . 3 65 93 C..
I39
•p•,o.0 2•00••. . A , -- . e• "-. • -• - . - -.
6m
2o.,W 1,o. loo. so* cc. 701W
5.8 5.7 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.0-4.9'..1 5.7 5.6 5.9 5.8 SO.N
I
SI
*O"00. 1," 90 °
i r
d0o ?0 "W
2 2 2 3 4 3..
-19 2.4 2.4 3 4 / I :3 2.s 2.8
.2 35 a
.4'2 /0.
4o--4ro/
. 5.6( fe 3 4.5 %5 3.0 4? 4.6 4.2 3. 3 40
4
'" •' ' / 1O" 0 I ":0 3C"•
S3 2 .1 4. 52 5.7 4.54805.a 5.. 45.55 5.4 5300N
3
40
1H01% 110* 100. 900 70.w
?s*
3
32 2.2 1.8 2.1 3.8 317 3.8 3.5 3.2 s
3.
2.3 2.4 .3 3.8 1 2.8 2.7 2.2 0 1.6 1.9 25 3.5
002
2
30*N 1 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.1 _ 2.1 2.20 2.5ý- 2.6 3. 34 3530* -
22 2 2 2
50"- 2- 23 1. 14 --1- 0o-- 2 2.7.o•.••1 2.1 -50-N
1 ~4 ,
4uo- 2.4 3,5 4.4 3.7 ý.8 2.2 2.2 2.8 2.8 3. 4.7 -40'
C. 0 0
I I I I I
20'• 10' '00' 90' 50'
s70.
41
_____ ____ __
WN1
I
VI DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
for design purposes, but often cannot answer important questions such
as the following:
(1) What is the three-dimensional extent of a turbulent volume?
(3) How long does the turbulent area last, and how far does
it travel in association with synoptic meteorological
features?
of aircraft has been built and flown. At that point, design decisions
will have already been made. Mistakes in design due to poor knowledge
are being carried forward, as they should be. However, the fact that
43
<.
In
100,000-foot level in the United States every day has been ignored in
regard to the possibility of their carrying direct turbulence sensors
aloft. The sole exception in the United States is the very interesting
work reported by Anderson (1957) using the gustsonde; since that time
technology has improved greatly. Certainly on low-level towers, direct
measurements of turbulence predominate over indirect sensing, and this
might be taken as a partial guide for the stratosphere. Instrumental
mine whether the FPS-16 Rose system can detect turbulence in the strato-
sphere. Of course, this can only be done at those few sites having
FPS-16 radars.
United States are based on data obtained prior to 1960 that are unrep-
resentative of jet-stream conditions, it -would be desirable to recompute
them. This is a fairly large but straightforward task that could be
shear climatology and earlier values would dictate that the estimated
turbulence frequencies of Sec. V be redetermined.
44
4
APPENDIX
45
45
I-
120W to-
0 I00. 90" S00 701W
I 1.5 I.,5 \ I
eN i 0. 1.2 I.5 1.7 .5 1, I.4)I , I1.5-- 1.5 1.4 1.4-50-N
0 0
0
1
. •.Z 1.5 1.d 1. 9 1.7 1.8 2.0 .2.1 2, -2.0-2
2. 5
1.5-
1. C ,) 1 2 o % 2.4 2--...5 . .4 26 23-,
0 2.5
2.2 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.2 (2 .6 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
2.3
20 '*= P22.5
30*N- 23 2.0 1. "1. .? 6 .5-30-N
2/
9 19 1.4 .3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9
i i ;
i1 '5 I IO*
1 1.5 t00°
I
so, 80* 7o.
120*W
(a) Magnitude of the mean shear vector at 325 mb in winter, units 10-3 sec-1
120"W I tO* tO0' 90' 80" 7 O7W
I I 6 t•II I
6
50N 7.0 6,4 6.0 6.1 5.8 54 5.8 59 5.8 5.6 5.4 5. -50-N
40-- 7.1 6.2 5.3 5.7 6.1 6.3 7.0 .I 6.9 6.8 7.3 7. 7-40o
7.0 6.7 6.9 -7 7.0 6. 7.1 7.5 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.4
0 1~'7
6 4
30"Nm 7., 7.6 8.0 8.6 6.1 7.2 6.9o 6.7- 6 6.4 6.4 . - 30-,N
6
7.5 7.5 7.7 .7 7.3 6.7 6.2,,,,5.9 5.7 .7 5.7 5.7
7 6
I O' 0OO' 90, s0' 70.
i20tW
(b) Standard deviation of the shear vector at 325 mb in winter, units 10-3 soc-1
47
120** 10 100'
too* go. ?.W
I I I I
~- 2~ 22 23 23 24 26 27 26 30 31 32 32 -WIN
yS 0 0
24~ 24 25 26 26 29 30 33 6 -36
25- 3
401- 2 26 29 3 31 33 5 37 39 39
0 0 0 0
25 0 30
24 24 25 26 28 30 32 33 34 33 31 29
2 1 1
48
A
1201W 110. 10o 900 so, 70.w
II I I
,o'- 9.5 61.6 6.3 6.4 7.2 6.9 7 7.2 .9 6.3 6.3 /7.1 850-N
0
0
7
40-- 9. .7 6.3 6.2 7.4 6.6 6.6 8.6 7.6 . 0 0
0o 1
0
9
8.6 8.3
7.
7.6 6.4 7.5 7.7 6.1 6.5 8.7 9.4 1 9.7
1' 9
*30*%- 8.4 8.4 6. 7.4 73 7.1 7.9 e.4- 6.7 L8.9 6.9 8.9.O.
88
..
97.1 7.11 6.6 .6 6.6 6.6 7.1l 7.77 7.19 .9 . 7.9
(e) Standard deviation of the shear vector at 225 mb in winter, units 16-3 s.c-1
25
03
0 3
27) 26 26 27 26 30 31 33 'A4 3
0 0
30 40
32 33 33 34 35 36 37 38 03ý1-.-40 39 36
25 .-- 25
22 2 26 2,6 28 28 /27 26 25 4 24 4
25 2 0
49
120" 110. tOo* W0* 00 1W
I 0.5 I I
•Ot_ ,.5 1.0 \0o3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0. 2 -5o.N
1.9 1.1 0.9 1.4 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.4 6,..
0.7
0.5 1 i
' 0" 90 " s0o
3
(g) Magnitude of the mean shear vector at 187 mb in winter, units 10- sec-I
,20** t1. 'O0O 90, so. I O*W
8 87 6 6
01
-- 7.4 7.2 7.1 6. 5. 7.0 1. 7.5 6.4 7 I. 1.1 --.
0
"7
.2 a. 7.9 .5 6.5 7.6 6.5 7.9 7.3 I9.1 0.? 10.7
7.2
, 6.9 7.5 .1 6. 641 0. 10.2 10.5
t
(k'l) Stmadard deiation of -.he sieer victor at 187 mb in winter, uni s 10-3 sec-1
FIG. A-1 tCwnclud.d)
50
I
lzo* 1.°w,0" 100° 90, so. 'CO'l
115
I2
.. , 1,7 1.5 1. 2 1.5 I.7 1.5 1.2 5
2.5
I.8 1.7 1.9I 1.9 1,8 f'? 1. 2.l 2.3 25 2.7
2.2 2.3 2.4 \2.4 Z.2 2. i.7, I.L-- 2.'0 2.2 2.3 2.3 30,,
2
2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2
-9 1.19 '.9 19
2
7"" 90. C
(a) Magnitude of the mean shear vector at 325 mb in spring, units 10 sec
2* 0. C.
5.355 54 '' 5. 5
5c. 5-2 5.2 5.5ý 5.2 5.6 5. \4 5 .
6 - 6
6.1i 6.2 6.1 6.7 6.4 6.0 5.6 5.9 5.6 5.3 5 6'16.6
5.6 5.6 5.4 5.3 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.4 62.2 '. 2 6.2
(b) Standnrd deviation of the shear vector at 325 nib ,n sprtg, un,fs IC sec
51
O.1 IK 4 0.2 0.4 03 . i 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3-50..
i0
N0
4Q .~2 1. 2.6 2.6 z.i3-Ito 1.5 1.* 1.? 0.6 0.
00 0
22
3$
"1
. N 2.6 3.1 34 35 33-- 3 .6 3..
09 °4 .• C IC *"\J IC
'2 4 *S .0\ 7.. 2-1 2.2 2.4 2. 3.4 3ý.0 2.7
(c) Man~tudeofINC.
1
(c) Mani lnude of th e taloe ."aor vec Tr at 225
' m6 in spring, wnits 03 Sc-
8, 7• 6 \6
-G i V. 3 G.7 6.6 63 4 66.
"--, \ 0 I ,.-
/62 62 65 6. 6.63. . 7 64 a C
6.Z C - . 65 '. 6 . -0 --
NY.
N -.-. ,,.-Zs
I dlStierdo~ ide.oter. of
IS
, shieer vecwo
FiG A-i
at 225 mb tm sj'ng
Cce-,,'n.,#
vf-10 10- c -.
$ 52
to*t
!4-4/ 09
o 1.0 0.7 05\ 0 t I 1 0 1 0 5
1. 1 4i 9/-4
,1)
0.0
\,1 .( 1.4 1 /01 ! 1.9 0. /2.2- 2 .
'\•~ r"1
0.9 0 7 0 .6 12
° ,-L!
1. .
.. \ ,1" 1 5 1.>
0 .5 0. . . , ,
,0. 5 0.6 0.4 04
4 0. 0 0a 0 7
it) Magnitude of the meon $hear vector ot 187 -b in spring, unit 10- sec
. -65
, . 5,2 5. 2t
627 /, I -'\:i
,>-9 • -4C e
6 4 11 ' 0 . 81 DO- a 0 1
C3
120W 110 o 1000 too So. ?O#W
1. 4 1 '(•2 I I I
1.5 2
(a) Magnitude of the mean shear vector at 0 325 mb in summer, units 10-3 sec- 1 o5
120oW 10* I00 90* 60* ?0w
5 5.6 5.654 59 5
5
4 5.0 5.2 5.6 5.65
"-------------------------------------------
0
~~5
5.O58
ThI•
.
7 5952 4
401- 5.0 5.0 " 4.9 4.7 4. 7 .9 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.2 5.5 5.7 -40"
0 0 0
05
4.7 4.5 4.3 3.9 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.4 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.9
4.2 4.1 3.9 .9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.6 3.8
SI I I I
1201W 10 100. 90 o 0o* 70 W
1
(b) Standard deviation of the shear vector at 325 mb in summer, units 10-3 sec-
5I.
1209W 90 too00. 90 go.' OOW
o
0I
5TN- 1 15 16 97 is8 22 23 25 25 25 24-o,
0'
20 2220 5
II0
0 -0
0 15
_5 ,5- 3'-
4
30'h__ 5 4 "4 . 4 0 • < 4 -3O*N"
0.
2 31 4 6 -" -5 5 42 2
i'0' 1O
00' 0 90" 80* 1O.*
10
0-- 20 19 19 1 18 1 18 18 14 18 18 118--o
4o. 1 17 I5 PT 16 i 16 5 16
0
14 04 4
14 4 4 43 13 23 3 I4 9-1'2
30"t __ 12 l0 12
20- 80, II
VkJ
110'
IO lOCI" 90' O O
(d) Standard deviation of the wind vector at 325 mb in summer,
-I units m sec-1
5s s
1201* 110. 100. 90* S0* 7O1W
I 1 6 i7 1 20 I
Is0" 1is 15 16 16 17 1•
6 19/ 23 25 27 27-50-N
00
,o. 0 2 2 -2' -3 -5 -6 -7
- -8 -6 -6 -6" -•-. 20
F o -)
- I -l -I -II -14 -16 -16 -15 -t5 -14 -II
-II -II-
9
30N* -3 3 -16 18 12 -13
9 " -30.N
I I -10-10 I I I - oI
20*W 110*
i 100 90, 80s ?0. W
(e) Relative vorticity computed from mean winds at 325 mb in summer, units 10-6 sec-
120*W 1;01 I00. 90, 80s 70*W
I 0 1 1.5 11 1 1.5I I
3
=0.2 0.4 0.6 .7. 1.4 .9 0.4 0. -50.N
0 ol .. .8 0.ll
700
.o 9
0 .8 0.8 01.8 0.9 0.1.5 8 6 0. 0.8 0.,9. 0.9 1.1 1 -4.4
0 0
-.- -. . _ ' "
0.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.3 0 0. 1.1 1.4
00.5
(f) Magnitude of the mean sheor vector at 225 mb in summer, units 10-3 sec-1
1. 56
120°W 110, 1000 90, 100 70.W
17 1 1•
ý I 1
50"N--
SW 6.3 6.0• 7.3 7.6 7.5 ". 7.7 7.6 7.61 7.1 7.1
I
7. ON
o .. .. .. .....
S0,
6.4 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.6 6.7 6.5 6 .5?!e. 5
0
5.Z24
5 5, 5 5.
(g) Standard deviation of the shear vector at 225 mb in summer, units 10-3 sec-1
50*N
S._
o• 0.9
o°
0.8
o,
0.9
.
1.4 ý\\ý17
. --,I7.1
.•
1.41
,4
I•.
,,-.•
I7'
.
. 1.516'5
3.6
- 1'*15 ''
So~o~o o O o 4, g
30 0 .0 N-
0 .3 0.3 0.4" 0 0.3" 0.1 0.3 0.30 0.3 /,0,60 05 0.2 0.2 3.
0.7 0.6 0.7Y. 2 003 0 ý3 0. ./.
0
50
0.1 0.1 2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7\ 0.3 0.3
Q5 0.5
'0.W C'001 90, so, 70*W
(h) Magnitude of the mean shear vector at 187 mb in summer, units 10- ze-
57
II
X6.1 5. 9 7.40-
0 6.1 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.3 %.6 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.9 400
i5
30'N 4.9 4.9 4. 5.0 4.8 4.8 5.3o 5. 6. 6.3 6.2 6.1 30N
48 4.8 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 15.1 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.5
i I 5 5 I 5III
120*W 110" 100. goo s0o 70 W
0(i) Standard deviation of the shear vector at 187 mb in summer, units 10-3 sec-1.
58
jI.
I
V
10.w i o* too* ,o* go. 70.w
•' 1 .5-.-4 • .. 1
0
,. /9 9.0 '1ý . .
1.,5
I I5 1.711.
I I I
1201W 1 100* 90, 80s 70. w
(a) Magnitude of the mean shear vector at 325 mb in fall, units 10-3 sec-1
120 "% 110 1001 90, go 70-W
3 6 6
~6.2 6.2 6.5 9 6.9 6.4 6.4 6.2 5.0 5.8 5
5.3 5.2 4.9 4.9 5.1 5.5 5.6 6.2 067 66 6.6 6.9
0
I I
0 " 90 " 80 70
(b) Standard deviation of the shear vector at 325 mb in fall, units n-3 sec-1.
59
'2OV• Ho' 100 * 60w' 7Ow <
S! !I I I
00
N 2
0.8 0.8 . 1.6 .6'•.0 1.7.- 1.9 1.
0. 0.30. 0.8
,I . . 0. s5** "
cc. 90,
3
(c) Magnitude of the mean $hear vector at 225 mb in fall, units 10- sec-ý
6. 6
~Q~~8.0 7.7 7. 5 8.0 7.5 6.6 5. 5.6 6.0 5.9 6.0 C6 7.6
(,6 L.2 1
40" 6.5 6.0 ý5.A6 6.2 6.6 1.5 6.2 6.9 6.9 6.8 7.8e S.4_.
08
6.7 6.5 5.9 5.5 6.0 6.7 6.9 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.8 7.8
/ 7
30"'- 6.9 6.9 68 6.3 6.1 6.6 6.9c 6.9- 6.9 .6.9 6.9 6.9.03c...
(d) Standard deviation of the sheor vector at 225 mb in fall, units 10-3 sec 1
60
IL
."000.
1201W I 903 go0 701W
0o.5 0.5 1 1
I,.) 0.4a0td of h /m s vcor
.e 18. , u.nit
0 .8 o.-0.0
I'.1o .0 1.0 0. 0
4. 0.3 0.4 o.0 o 0 9 .
o.1 . 6..1.3\0..2
ý .1,3 7..
0.7 6..
8.6 0.360.7 ,74
13,N 0203
- 0 0 1 02 ., 05- . . . ._.I.--0.
,• I.•
OC* 90* so, 70O°W
\00
0 . .5 . 0.7 7.0 7.2 6.8 .6 6. 6. .305 69 . 1.93
0a shear vector at 187 mb in fall, units 10-3 sec-1.
(e) Magnitude of the mean
1201W " '0 . 100. 90C so. To.*
.,7.5 7 2 7.2 7 .5 7.3 7\ 6. 6.5 61.9 6.7 61.1 6.0 613 so. N
6 2,.. 5. 60 I 6. . 7.-. .
6 .6 6.6 6.3 " 6- 6 3 6.C 6.9 , 7.G..-- 7.2 .7.4 ,-'6 7".5-- 0" 4
6 .6
•)Standard deviation of the sheu, vector at 187 mb irn fall, units 10 3 sec
61
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I 1
I
REF EREINCES
layers. Amer. Inst. Aeron. and Astron., Paper 66-352, AIAA, New
York, N. Y., 11 pp.
Briggs, J. and W. T. Roach, 1963: Aircraft observations near jet
streams. Quart. Jour. Roy. Meteor. .c., 89 pp. 225-247.
65
Danielsen, E. F. and R. T. Duquet, 1967: A comparison of FPS-16 and
Calif., 62 pp
Essenwanger, 0, 1963: On the derivation of frequency distributions of
vector wind shear values for small shear intervals, Geofis. Pura
Gorfinkel, M., 1967: Users manual for the Stanford Research Institute
66
Harrison, H. T., and D. F. Sowa, 1966: Mountain wave exposure on jet
routes of Northwest Airlines and United Airlines. Meteorology
Circular No. 60, United Airlines, Chicago, Ill., 65 pp.
110 pp.
Jones, J. W. and L. K. Atnip, 1964: High intensity gust investigation.
Technical Report under Contract AF33(600)-43501, Boeing Aircraft
waves in the jet stream. Aeron. Eng. Review, 11, pp. 1-7.
Kuettner, J. P., 1958: The rotor flow in the lee of mountains. AFCRL
GRD Research Notes No. 6, Air -or(. Cambridge Research
Laboratories, Bedford, Mass., 1.1 pp.
67
Force Surveys in Geophysics No. 190, Air Force Cambridge Research
Laboratories, Bedford, Mass., 65 pp.
Ratner, B. J., 1959: Upper-air climatology of tl'e United States.
Part 3, Vector Winds and Shear, Tech. Paper No. 32, U. S. Weather
sampling programs. Amer. Inst. Aeron. and Astron. Paper No. 65-13,
68
'7
S.t
I
U
I[NCLASS I F IEl)D
Security Classification
DESCRPTIV
NOTESE
(TTypEreotad nlsvedls T4.
of00
Robert L. Mancuiso
REPORT DATE 7C81A O.O AE 4 O rRF
862t-02-01 _____________________
C.000 ELEMENT S T ýj AY0%rnmesA Wb
(A1ear inghouse , 1)tpartrrrelL of' Comminerce, f'or sale LO thle general public.
IT. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12. SONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY
Tlie cininatolg
ii i of i lear-air tirhitilerice is defiilsd herein as the likelIihooid hiat an ai rcraft or
iri]s.Si Ic will ericiiiiter tiirliilertt air alt a givell local it,N,al t ititde, arid t irw (if scar. Turaiule!,ce data
ifthree types were uised iii till, sit dv7 Ithese inrlridie (lmrvat lors lIv instromierited research aircraft,
Illooi tracks treasiured 1,\ FIN- It) radar, arid t urhri lerice r,'jurts mnadeIrs- pilots. Thle mleasurecuepnts tiat
hiave lien nade i.\ research aircrFaft show goodl re lat itilrr.i'.p betwoeri turbulence arid certain aspects oif
riiwoscia I atmnospierii strirct ire, bItjt tile data are, too im ited in tiunilier to permit, liroad general iza-
urins. Tie FI'- lii tracks 1f' ri sing linus piere arid Riseo laIlh,lws were obt atined during stiudres of de-
tille lis im prohl I.- Vo invýtise t I~te
tictr lolentit al vsIncij In idertit fstig Itirlilernt tavers . In
genetra I thle exjiitinf data are to niurot ss to serve ti 5 o 1 iehiiwever, ftrither spca trinalI, are
recotrneiiln ed . TIP s i t rstie nitrbili eice repori t s f rile 1t i.ir lnleIit ed iirt iring speciralI five -dav rep0- titrig
pertiods imnuprtsev Iv fat the largest %oiilitiuno~f data avai labnle . \eiiriiliigica I conirlt ioins for these
wjiotr \fereý aia lszed i l (xiiknnitter from standard rawirisitrde data. anii kere corre lated w ith the tiili-it-
cricv repnirt ., '14 nrre hrtionn qhnw Likat. ilte vertical %cclor 9,mrd hliar c orrespxitds miost c lose Is to
tuirluiler-ice rrvqijicins let erminied from tilie pitlint report., L~ittiha dditionatl redictiotiii of %ariance ini
hie tiiti-ilerice frequient- os is achieved 1AvoIc lidtini othter ntii*vriiloigria I' ftor1s. qit (IimiarnTill I t 11 pe
regresslir Ioneit iriotns [let %eer tnr~nleince: frenpicuit , at~id tile nueatiantd stanidard deviat otr if thle vert ica I
ni-i Aor
ar shear w ir- ibta tined. I ii situter a dlifferenit regress run eqitat tori was fiu,.rd than I innoter
tiririlirie lisersat tion, taken ini tot(. are t~i few~ tI, lernut a dtirect rotiiinitat oli (if torbn '-rice
flus,
Ir'e(ijueric\ thereflore II tndidrect n'tediiui %as used tot obtla in the ttirblrletuce c I iartnaoliig. l1ii tsinviilved
tills hug the, regrresslilti eqitulttiltis tiiexistinrig statist its of wind shear over the britted states. These
fiio-.ier
ifislutitIS iris.preprenl almosit ten sears agoi, iJpiear to 1,e (if quiesti luirihle relrahilhits tin
the 111,10'r rp nreantI stirat.,slaliere dunv toi a large uroitoiit ti if its ing * ind ol)servitliots ottder
,olldl iri gliwni spee-ds a loft . I~ie to iricertarint is lin rte regressio Nii
high qal Ions arid shear
,toi.tI,,, the, dedniwed ttitholItrce I iliatotloig% (giseri 11Nseasoins for levelIs luetwrenr afuproiutntate!\
t, uuat-l l~h~tt feet ) nfltist lie cout~isdered a ftrst est imtune.
W(a u'I ioql~ii s ale rukde r liar atii ui-tt-date wind-smear i-I ittatinlog\ -%lig)-itnitted for the Iniredý
trilIhat t orts utrat titr lie given to develtjnlng a alul vuri-Ibirruc t ir iii entue senisoir to aoritelit
and>
-itraira reeati( hi aircraft atid ttlltiie 1,ults.
DO '01%N6 1473
Security Classification
Turbulence, clear-air
Wind shear
Jet stream
Mountain waves
Pilot reports
Turbulent gusts
Rose balloons
Turbulence sensors
INSTRUCTIONS
1. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY: Enter the name and address 10. AVAILADILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES: Enter any Hmis-
of the contractor, subcontractor, grantee. Department of ltatoos on further disaeminatj.in of the report, other than those
Defense activity or rither organization (corporoze author) imposed by security cleassification, using standard statements
issuing the report. such as:
U. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: Enter the over- (I) "Qualified requesters may obtain copies of this
all security classification of the report. Indicate whether report from DDC.
"Restricted Deta" is included. Marking is to be in accord- (2) "Foreign announcement end disaeminstion of this
sancs with appropriete seccuhity regulations. report by DDC is not authorized."
2b. GROUP: Automatic downaradin. i's specified in DoD (3) "U. S. Government agece may otai coiso
Directive 530O.10 end Armed aoreaindustriallManusl. this report directly roDO. Other DDC
N Zulfe
Enter the group number. Also, when stpllcebi , show that users shall request throughq
optional miarkings have been wsed for Group 3 and Group 4
in .11z~d (4) "U. S. military agencies may obtain copies of this
3. REPORT TITLE: Enter the complete report title inalreport directly foDO.Other qualifited users
ca.pital fetters Titles in Il cases should fie unclassified, shall request through
If a neasialgful title cannot he selected without clasaifica-
ties, show title cleassification in all capitals in parearhesis
immdi*aely following the title. (5) "All distribution of this report is controlled. Quali-
4. ritSCRIPTIVE NOTES: If appropriate, enter the typ of fied DDC users shall request through
report. e0. 1s aempoges uuj. anul o
Give the InlusiF*ve Jteepr*Mwhee saampecii'careporltinog ploriold is
cow".sd If the report has been :umibnd to the Office of Technical
Services, Depertiusat of Commerce, for "ile to the public. indi-
S.AIUlOR(S): Enter the nemeWs of authorWs as shown on cate this fact and enter the price, if known.
or in the report. Ester lsat samne, first name, middle initial.
If military, show task sandbreanch of service. The nasme of 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTS: Use for additional explana-
the princicpal author is an asoaluts minimum requ'rsemet. tory notes.
6. REPORT DATE: Enter the dals of the report as day, IL SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY: Enter the same of
noth, year, or miosab, year. If more than one date appears the departmental project office or leboratory $Pensowing (pay.
4 nathe report, ass data of publication. Is# forl the research end development. Include address.
7&. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: The total page count 1S. ABSTRACT: Enter an abstract Ifiving a brief andffactual
should follow normal paginailon procedures, I.e., atutr the essmry of the document indicative of the report, even
Sanmbel of pagea coetai.10g; information. iatheo it may also apper elsewhere in the biody of the tech-
76. NUMBER OF REFERENCES: Enter the total member of Ashet shall be attached. saei ela ,acniuto
referoacee cited is the rePor. It is highly desiabele tbat the obstruct ot classified ro-
le. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER: If apprpiate. estar poans he ancleasified. Each paragrph of the shivtact shall
the applicable Mumber of the cobarect or firas cedr which end with an indication of the military *&corkty classification
the report was written. of the Ieformatijon in the paragraph. fog ssted as (IS), (S).
gg, at. A Gd. PROJECT NUMBER: Enter the appropriate (c). or (U1).
militarydepentmseat idsailflcatloa, such as project number. There is So lmnitatiol ontthe length of the abotract. H~OW-
subproeeet somber, eyeless alusber, task nember, etc. ever, the saggstede length in froma130 tr. 225 words.
go. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S): Enter the offi1- 14. KEY WORDS: Key words we technically mania"fi termse
cial report sember hy which the document will he Idastilied or *hban p=assthat characteris, arpert and my be used as
and coantrolled by the eriginating activity. This number mot lade. entre farctalogingth nr. Key weed mant he
he askiqs to this report. selected so th" so security tclal jotl".es is oired. hdeati.
Ph. OThER REPORT NUMBERM) If the reet igbesclraeah" es lw, iieatmoe
us msis
ill-
assigned sanyether report members (tialer by iA. coglasiesw ~ ~
* tcede am s~h In elws actd yh sa
tr 6y the aloasori. alee enter this @sawil) yasw s hut Willahe 4n bysadicaties
b of tachasical
I.TeassipsaI of lakksrules, Oad weights is
____ ____ ____ ____ _ epiamal.
Security c~laasillics~fe.
sum