NZGS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING BASICS DISCLAIMER: This reference guide is not a standard.

It is a ‘rough guide’ based on common

DEEP FOUNDATIONS
NZGS Geotec(PILE
NZGS Geotechnical EDESIGN)
practice in New Zealand. The recommended guide is notcalculation process/analytical methods within this

hnical Engineering Basics:

Prepared by: Anthony Rolfe (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.) DISCLAIMER: This reference a standard. It is a ‘rough guide’ based on common
All photos/sketches document are innotNewintended to be Thecodified nor does the document hold any legalmethods
requirement/
Prepared bycreated/provided by T+T DISCLAIMER:
practice This reference
Zealand. guide is
recommended not a standard.
calculation Itprocess/analytical
is a ‘rough guide’ based onwithin
common this

DRAFT
ngineering Basics:
: Anthony Rolfe (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.)
unless indicated otherwise. created/provided by T+T standing in NewinZealand.
practice
document New
are not The accuracy
Zealand.
intended Theto be of the process
recommended
codified nor described
calculation
does the below depends
process/analytical
document hold any highly on thewithin this
methods
legal requirement/
PreAll parphotos/sketches
NZDGeS pGGFepSoou
tencLtd.)
dohnatnedtiicacAll
ohatninlophotos/sketches
sE (nsPgilieneDeersiniggncreated/provided
B) asics:
ed by: Anthony Rolfe (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.)

DRAFT
Review expertise of theinThis DISCLAIMER:regarding
geoprofessional This reference the guide is not
modelling a standard.
ofadescribed
the design, It isunderstanding
the a ‘rough guide’ based on common
ofon
Alledphotos/sketches
by: indicated otherwise.

eZ&e
unless created/provided by T+T standing
document
DISCLAIMER: New
are Zealand.
not intended
reference The
guide accuracy
to is be
not a of
codified the
standard. process
nor does
It is the document
‘rough below
guide’ holddepends
based anyon highly
legal
common the
requirement/

DRAFT
DISCLAIMER: This reference
practice guideZealand.
inlimitations,
New is not aselection
standard.
The ofItmaterial
recommended is
is anot‘rough guide’ based
calculation on
thecommon
Itprocess/analytical guide’methods
based onwithin this

N G e ic a l E n g i n
igneBeagirn
e e r nigi)ccgsB :aassiNZ
cicss: : by T+T unless indicated otherwise.
wedPb(Tonkin
rey:pared&byTaylor : Anthony Ltd.)Rolfe (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.) DISCLAIMER: This reference guide ofathestandard. isand
aunderstanding
‘rough common
PREPARED BY: Anthony Rolfe (Tonkin Taylor
Dr. Eng Liang Chin various soilinmodels
expertise of and
the their
geoprofessional the
regarding the modelling parameters,
design, the ability of
eredRdebbvyiy:indicated
PPrereppaunless eAnthony otherwise. practicestanding New inZealand.
New Zealand.
The The
recommended accuracy of the process
calculation described
process/analytical below depends
methods highly
within on
this the requirement/

N Z G S D
G
arLarisch
eeo teF
c o
h un ic a l E n
n g i n(eP i
e ler i nDg eBs i
a ssni(Jacobs s:B
Rolfe (Tonkin &&created/provided
Taylor Ltd.) practice
All photos/sketches (Tonkin by T+T Ltd.) theinresults.
New Zealand.
document Theare recommended
not intended calculation
to aprocess/analytical
berecommended
codified nor does the methods
document within
hold any this
legal

REVIEWED BY: Dr. Eng Liang N ZG(Tonkin

SG NeZoGt&SeTaylor
cGhenoictLtd.),
ecl hEnDr. igciaMartin
nleEenrignLarisch
Martin (Jacobs
: Anthony eNZ
paLtd.)
Rolfe ed(Tonkin Taylor Ltd.) practice
DISCLAIMER: in
This New Zealand.
reference The
guide calculation process/analytical methods within this
theisthe
not ofstandard. Itparameters,
isany
aThese
‘rough guide’thebased
abilityon ofcommon

DRAFT
RevDr. iewEng y: Pcreated/provided
ed bLiang rChin r(Tonkin
by: Anthony
& Taylor Rolfe
Ltd.) & Taylor todocument
judgevarious
expertise soilnot
are Underlined
models
of the and their
geoprofessional
intended text contain
limitations, hyperlinks
regarding the to document
selection external
modelling materialsources.
ofprocess
the design, thehyperlinks
and
understanding
intoto be codified nor does hold legal requirement/

DZeGeS
pGFoeuontedcahtnioicnasl (EPnilgeinDeeesriignng)Basics:
All
Allphotos/sketches by T+T document are not intended
standing New be codified
Zealand. nor
The does
accuracythe document
of the hold any
describedlegal requirement/
belowhold depends highly onthis
the

DRAFT
photos/sketches unless indicated
created/provided otherwise.
bycreated/provided
T+T document are not intended to be codified nor does the document any legal requirement/
Chin Martin Larisch All photos/sketches
(Jacobs NZ Ltd.) (Tonkin & Taylorby T+T
Ltd.) are subject to practice
failure should in New
these Zealand.
posters The
be recommended
reviewed in print calculation
form. process/analytical methods within

N
P r ep a r e d b y : Anthony Rolfe Ltd.)

DRAFT
Dr. Eng Liang Chin (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.) tovarious
judge the
soil results.
models Underlined
and textof contain hyperlinks toofexternal sources. Theseand hyperlinks
unless
unlessindicatedindicated otherwise.
Rotherwise.
evunless
iewed indicated
by : standing
standing ininNew
New Zealand.
Zealand.
expertise The
Theoftheir
accuracy limitations,
accuracy
the ofthe
the
geoprofessional the
process selection
process described
described
regarding thematerial
below
below
modelling parameters,
depends of thehighly
depends highly
design, onthe
on the
the
the ability
understanding of the

D e euen
pnpddFaa
ototuiiouonnndsd
saa(t(P
iP
oiiiolnleenssD
(Pe(ePisslieiilggen
D )e) essigignn) )
otherwise. documentstanding are in
not New Zealand.
intended tobe The
be accuracy
codified of the process described below depends highly on
RReevvieiMartin All photos/sketches
Larisch (Jacobs NZ Ltd.)created/provided by T+T are
to subject
judge theto failure
results. should
Underlined these posters
text contain reviewed
hyperlinks ofnor
inthetodoes
print the document
form.
external sources. hold
These any oflegal
hyperlinks requirement/

DRAFT
ewweeddbbyy: : unless expertise ofofthe geoprofessional regarding the modelling design, the understanding

D
Deep FDoeu
e e p F o
Dr. REng Liang Chin (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.) expertise the geoprofessional
various regarding the modelling of the design, thematerial
understanding ofthe highly
insoil models and their limitations, the selection of theparameters, and the onability
D nD
e v ie w e d b y : standingexpertise New ofZealand.
the geoprofessional
The accuracy regarding
ofmaterial
the the
process modelling
described ofbelow design,
depends understandingthe of
F t
Dr. indicated otherwise.
Dr.EngEngLiang LiangChin (Tonkin
Martin
Chin
Revie(Tonkin
& Taylor
Larisch
by:&
Ltd.)
(Jacobs
Taylor Ltd.)NZ Ltd.)& Taylor Ltd.) various are subject
soil models
various soil models to failure
and
and
to judge theirshould
their these
limitations,
limitations, posters
the be
selection
thetheir reviewed
selection of in
of material print form.
parameters,
parameters, and the
and the ability
ability
Dr.
weNZ dEng Liang Chin (Tonkin various
expertise ofthe soil
the results.
models Underlined
geoprofessional and text contain
limitations,
regarding thethe hyperlinks
selection
modelling toof
of external
the material
design, sources.
parameters,
the Theseand
understanding hyperlinks
theofability

Deep Foundations (Pile Design)

Martin
MartinLarisch Larisch(Jacobs NZLtd.) totojudge
(Jacobs
Dr. EngMartinLiang Ltd.)
Larisch (Jacobs&NZ
Chin (Tonkin Ltd.)Ltd.)
Taylor judgethe theresults. areUnderlined
results.
various Underlined
subject
to judge
soil to
models
text
text
thefailure
contain
contain
results.
and should hyperlinks
hyperlinks
Underlined
their limitations,
to external
textto
these posters external
be
contain
the
sources.
sources.
reviewed
hyperlinks
selection of material
These
in printThese
to
hyperlinks
hyperlinks
form.
external sources.
parameters, andThese hyperlinks
the ability
STEP 1:
SteGeotechnical
p 1 : Geotechnical Ground Ground Model
are
aresubject
subjecttotofailure should these posters be
bereviewed inin print form.
Model Martin Larisch (Jacobs NZ Ltd.) failure
to judge should
are subject
the these
results. posters
to failure should
Underlined reviewed
these
text posters
contain print form.
be
hyperlinks
Very dense gravel (SPT N60 > 50)
reviewed in printsources.
to external form. These hyperlinks
Step 1 : Geotechnical Ground Model are subject to failure should these posters be reviewed in print form.
Very dense gravel (SPT N60 > 50)
• Develop a• site-specific
Develop
Step 1a site-specific
• Develop
parameters
: Geground
by
otechn
a site-specific
critically
ground al Gprofile
icprofile
assessing
rouwith
ground
ndwith
profile
available
oappropriate
Mappropriate
del
with appropriate
geotechnical
soil
soil soil Very dense gravel (SPT N60 > 50)
parameters by
• 1critically
SStinformation
e p : G eS
parameters
Develop ot
a
e
t epc 1
h n
by
:
assessing
i
site-specific
G
c ae l oG
critically
t e
r c
o
ground
h
u nn i
d c
available
assessing
a
M l
profileoG dreo lu n
available
with
d
geotechnical M o d el soil
geotechnical
appropriate Very dense gravel (SPT N60 > 50)
tep 1 : GeoStteecphn (e.g. BH, 1 ic: aGleGortoeucn
CPT, test pits,
h dniM c aol dGerlound Model
geophysical data, Very
Verydense
densegravel (SPT
gravelVery
(SPTNN6060>>50)
50) (SPT N60 > 50)
informationlaboratory
(e.g.
••Develop BH,
parameters
aS
•teCPT,
information
testing,
Develop (e.g.
test
p 1by:geological oBH,
critically
Geaground ecCPT,
tpits, itest
geophysical
assessing
hmaps
site-specific caetc.).
nprofile pits, geophysical
available
lground
Gwith
rou nprofile
dM data, dedata,
geotechnical
owith laboratory
appropriate soil
lsoil
dense gravel
Develop asite-specific
laboratory
information •and
site-specific
(e.g.
Develop
parameters BH,ground
testing, geological
aCPT,
by profile
test
site-specific
critically maps
pits, with appropriate
appropriate
etc.).
geophysical
ground
assessing profile
availabledata,
with soil appropriate soil
geotechnical Very dense gravel (SPT N60 > 50)
testing, geological
• Define
parameters upper maps by etc.).
lower
critically boundaries
assessing of soil
available parameters
geotechnical for the DISCLAIMER: This reference guide is not a standard. It is a ‘rough guide’ based on common
parameters
laboratory
• Define • Develop
by critically
testing,
parameters
information assessing
a site-specific
geologicalby BH,
(e.g. maps
critically
CPT,available
ground profile
etc.).
assessing
test geotechnical
pits, rwith aredappropriate
epavailable
Pgeophysical Rolfesoil
geotechnical
data, practice in New Zealand. The recommended calculation process/analytical methods within this

NZGS Geotechnical Engineering Basics:

by: Anthony (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.)
• Define upper pileand
design
information lowerto upper
allow
(e.g. BH, and
boundaries
for lower
‘best’
CPT, test andboundaries
of
‘worst’
pits, soil of
case
geophysical soil
parameters parameters
assessments
data, for infor
the thepile document are not intended to DISCLAIMER: Thisdoes
be codified nor reference guide is not
the document holda standard. It is a ‘rough guide’ based on co
any legal requirement/
information (e.g.
parameters BH,
information CPT, by test
critically
(e.g. pits,
BH,and geophysical
assessing
CPT, test data,
All photos/sketches
available
pits, geophysicalgeotechnical created/provided
data, by T+T

DRAFT
• pile laboratory
design to allow testing,
for geological
‘best’ maps
‘worst’ caseetc.). assessments inPrepared by: Anthony Rolfe (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.) standing in New Zealand. Thepractice in of
NewtheZealand.
process The recommended calculation process/analytical methods
Define upper and lower boundaries ofanalysis.
soil parameters
NZGS Geotechnical Engineering Basics:
order to
laboratory perform
testing, a site-specific
geological mapssensitivity
etc.). unless indicatedfor the
otherwise. accuracy described below depends highly on the
design to allow for
laboratory ‘best’
testing,
information and
geological
laboratory ‘worst’
(e.g. BH,
testing, maps case
CPT, etc.).
test
geological assessments
pits,maps geophysical
etc.). in order
data, to
All photos/sketches created/provided by T+T document arethe
notmodelling
intended toof be
thecodified
design, nor
the does the document of hold any legal req

DRAFT
pileorder to perform
•laboratory aforsite-specific sensitivity analysis.
R e v ie w e d b y : expertise of the geoprofessional regarding understanding
perform a••site-specific
Define
Define
order
design
site-specific
upper
upper
• Define •and
to perform
to allow
Define
and
pileDefine
upper
sensitivity
lower
lower
design
testing,
groundwater
a upper
‘best’
and
boundaries
boundaries
site-specific
to and
allow
and boundaries
lower
geological
conditions.
analysis.
lower
for
of
‘worst’ case
ofsoil
‘best’
maps
soil
sensitivity
Always
parameters
parameters
boundaries
and
ofassessments
etc.).
Dr.
analysis.
‘worst’
Engsoil
allow
Liangparameters
for
ofLarisch
soil
casefor for
Chin (Tonkin
the
the
parameters
assessments
in &unless
for
Revifor
the
Taylorindicated
Ltd.)
dthe
ewein by :
otherwise.
Deep Foundations (Pile Design) standing
expertise
in New Zealand.
of the hyperlinks
The
geoprofessional
accuracy of
regarding
the process
the modelling
described
various soil models and their limitations, the selection of material parameters, and the ability below depends high
of the design, the understa

Deep Foundations (Pile Design)

site-specific groundwater conditions. Martin
Always (Jacobs
allow NZ Ltd.)
for to judge the results. Underlined text contain to external sources. These hyperlinks
continuous
pile design monitoring
to allow for if possible
‘best’ and (e.g.
‘worst’ standpipe
case piezometer
assessments in
• Define site-specific
pile design
• Define •logger).
groundwater
toorder
Define
continuous allow for
upper
pileBeware
design
to ‘best’
perform and conditions.
and
iflower
oftomeasurements
allow ‘worst’
apossible boundaries
for
site-specific‘best’case Always
and soil allow
assessments
of‘worst’
sensitivity casein
parameters
analysis.
Dr. Eng Liang Chin (Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.)
for
assessments theLarisch
in (Jacobs NZ Ltd.)
various soil models and their limitations,
are subject to failure should these posters be reviewed in print form. the selection of material parameters, and th
with
order
order level
to
to perform
perform
pile order aamonitoring
site-specific
design
groundwater
site-specific
site-specific
toperform
allow for
topossible sensitivity
sensitivity
a ‘best’
(e.g.
conditions.
site-specific
standpipe
taken
analysis.
and analysis.
‘worst’
Always
during
sensitivity case
piezometer
allow for
assessments in
analysis.
Martin to judge the results. Underlined text contain hyperlinks to external sources. These hy
for continuousdrilling monitoring
with
and•level
continuous seasonal
Define ifeffects.
logger).
monitoring Beware
site-specific if possible
Allow of (e.g.
for (e.g.
groundwater standpipe
measurements
tidal standpipe
effects taken
conditions. piezometer
seapiezometerduring
level Always allow for
are subject to failure should these posters be reviewed in print form.

with level •logger).

Define
•rise order
site-specific toseasonal
perform
groundwater a site-specific
conditions. forsensitivity
Always analysis.
allow for
Defineas drilling
with site-specific
Beware
level
appropriate. and
•logger).
Define
continuous groundwater
of Beware effects.
measurements
site-specific
monitoring Allow
conditions.
of measurements
groundwater
if possible tidal
Always
taken effects
taken allow
during
conditions.
(e.g. sea
during
standpipe for level
Always allow for
piezometer Weaker layer/silt bed (SPT N60 < 30) - SPT sample through layer not shown
continuous
continuousrise• as
drilling monitoring
and appropriate.
monitoring
Define seasonal
continuous ififpossible
site-specific possible
effects.
monitoring (e.g.
(e.g.
groundwater
Allow standpipe
if standpipe
for conditions.
tidal
possible piezometer
piezometer
effects
(e.g. seaAlways
standpipe level allow for
piezometer Weaker layer/silt bed (SPT N60 < 30) - SPT sample through layer not shown
drilling and seasonal
• Refer
with example
level
with
effects.
logger).
level
of ground S
Beware t e p
logger).
Allow 1
profile
of : G e
Beware
for o t e c
tidalhofn
with potentialtaken
measurements ic a l G
measurements
effects r o
founding u n
sea
duringd layers.el rise
M o d
taken
level during Very dense gravel (SPT N60 > 50)
as appropriate. •level
withrise as logger).
Refer withBeware
continuous
appropriate.
drilling
example and of measurements
ofmonitoring
level logger).
seasonal
ground profileif possible
Beware
effects.withSof
taken
(e.g.
measurements
tAllow 1 for
epotential
p :G
during
standpipe
tidal
efounding
otlevel
elevel
cwith npiezometer
htaken
effects l during
asea
ilayers. Grlevel
cappropriate oundsoil Model Weaker
Example layer/silt
Borehole bedshowing
core (SPT N60 embedded
< 30) - SPT sample
weaker through layer not shown
layer inside
drilling
• See
drilling
NZGS and
and seasonal
seasonal
Ground
withrise level •
Model
drilling effects.
Develop
effects.
logger). Poster.
and seasonal
asofappropriate.
Allow
a
Bewareeffects.for
site-specific
Allow for tidal
tidal effects
ground
effects
of measurements
Allow founding sea
profile
sea
for tidal taken effects during sea level Example Borehole core showing embedded Very dense gravel (SPT N60 >
• Refer
•of example ground profile with very dense Weaker layer/silt
gravel. bed (SPT N60 < 30) -weaker layerthrough
SPT sample insidelayer not shown
• Refer example rise
riseas asSeeground NZGS
appropriate.
appropriate.
drilling Ground
riseprofile
and Model
parameters
seasonal
as appropriate. with Poster.
by
potential
effects. •potential
critically
Allow
Developassessing
founding
for tidal available
effects
a site-specific
layers.
layers. sea levelExample
geotechnical
ground ground
profileExample
with profile.
appropriate
ground soil
profile.
ABOVE
Weaker
very
Weaker Example
layer/silt
dense Borehole
bed
gravel.
layer/silt (SPT
bed (SPT N <core
30)
N60 < 30)
60 - showing
SPT
- SPTsample
sample embedded
through
through layer
layernot shown
notthrough
shown layer not shown
• See •riseRefer exampleinformationofPoster.
ground (e.g. profile CPT, with
BH, parameters testpotential
pits,by geophysicalfounding layers.available
data, ABOVE Example ground profile. weakerExample
layer
Weaker
Borehole
inside
layer/silt
core
very dense
bed
showing (SPT
gravel.
N 60 < 30) - SPT sample
embedded weaker layer inside
• See NZGS••Ground
Refer
Refer NZGS
exampleModel
example Ground
as
of ground
• Refer example
of ground Model
appropriate.
poster. profile
profile
laboratory
with
with
of testing, potential
potential
ground geological
profile withfounding
founding
maps potential
critically
layers.
layers.
assessing
etc.). founding layers.
geotechnical
Example ground profile. very dense Weaker layer/silt bed (SPT N60 < 30) - SPT sample through layer not shown
gravel.
Example Borehole core showing embedded weaker layer inside
• •Refer See NZGS Ground Model Poster. information (e.g. BH, CPT, test pits, geophysical data, Example
ExampleBorehole core
coreshowing
showingembedded weaker layer
layerinside
S••tSee
example of ground profile with potential founding layers. Borehole
Example
very dense Borehole
gravel. embedded
core showing weaker
embedded inside
weaker layer inside
eSeep 2NZGS: DeGround
NZGS in•eSee
fGround geModel o•teDefine
Model
NZGS chPoster.
Poster.
nicupper
Ground al sModel candopelower laboratory
,Poster. zards,testing,
haboundaries loaofdsoil geological
parameters mapsforetc.).
Example
Example ground profile.
the ground profile. very
verydense gravel.
denseExample
gravel. Borehole core showing embedded weaker layer inside
Step• 2See : DNZGS efineGround geodesign
pile teModel chntoicallow aPoster.
l s•cfor o p e
‘best’ , h a
andz a r d s
‘worst’ ,
Define upper and lower boundaries of soil
lo a
case d assessmentsExample in ground profile.ground profile.
Example
parameters for the
very dense gravel.
cases and general risorder ks rto elperform
evant faosite-specific r pilethedesign pile sensitivity
dtoeallowsignforanalysis. Example ground profile. very dense gravel.
STEP 2: Define geotechnical scope, hazards, load cases and general risks
Stecpas2e:s D
sDDaeS
an
tep
efdingeengeroatlercishknsicraellesvcaonptef,ohratzhaerd
•ra
psile , loda ed si‘best’
gn and ‘worst’ case assessments in
g2gne:e2eooD elcfrihn ekicsite-specific
gaerleosltecebut vcoaphpnenare iorder
ch aarlzstato creodperform
pe ,eoto:
hdadaezsite-specific
a irgdnAlways
s, load
Define groundwater sensitivity
for analysis.
•SStTypical iconditions. allow
relevant for the pile design
teecppa2s•2e:Typical enffidSn
:considerations ntegeofep
iconsiderations
Sdctconsiderations
:tofteneDceihfsnininclude,
tecontinuous n is(shaft
ecaglmonitoring
often e oco
sinclude,
t e c •eht,,Define
n
fbut
hoinot
ifcaazare
l
h
possibles dsp
alimited
rcnotos,p ,llimited
site-specific loa
e
(e.g., a
sto:
ahdstandpipe
z a rd
groundwaters , lo a d
piezometer
conditions. Always allow for
gegacomponent
ecpesn es:raaDlnrediofwith fsisigknload
en gretransfer
eneerlee
avltearicns(shaftksBeware crrfriction/end-bearing).
eatllhesevca npiiltn f,odhreatshzigaenrpdisle,taken
ldoeasdduring
ign
- Main component load transfer friction/end-bearing).
cca-asPotential
s•eesTypical
saa- nMain
nd
founding a n2seelayer
e rsala(Rock/
rndrilling
d kseoften
g erdense/
slevel and loelogger).
r
include,l nrhtitsnfsoil).
vaseasonal
ahard foiobut
k s r hleofo
rcontinuous
teare
effects.
p
vnot e
pameasurements
lelimited
Allowt dfoefor
rstitidal
monitoring ghto:
ne peffects
ifipossible
le d e s
sea ig(e.g.
n
level
standpipe piezometer
• Typical considerations - Potentialoften
Mainccomponent
a•(axial esfounding
sTypical ginclude,
anofconsiderations
d load layer (Rock/but
entransfer
etension,
rappropriate.
al ri(shaft sdense/ sare
klateral,
often ehard enot
lwith ntlimited
level
vasoil).
rfriction/end-bearing).
include, fologger).
but rare thenot to:
Beware le deofsto:
pilimited measurements
ign taken during
Pile- loading rise as
••-Typical
– Main componentTypical - considerations
Pile of -•
loading
considerations
- Potential load
compression,
Typical
Main
founding
(axial
component
often
transfer
layer
compression,
often
considerations
(Rock/
include, (shaft
include,
of load
dense/
but
tension,
but
often
transfer hard
are
are
moment.
drilling
not
lateral,
include,
(shaft
soil).
and
notlimited
friction/end-bearing). moment.
limited seasonal
but to: to: noteffects.
are
friction/end-bearing).
Allow for tidal effects sea level
limited to:
Weaker layer/silt bed (SPT N60 < 30) - SPT sample through layer not shown
-- Select
-Main
the
Maincomponent
relevant
• Typical of design
ofload •componentstandard.
Refer
transfer
considerations example(shaft often of ground
friction/end-bearing).
include,
rise as
profileappropriate.
but with potential founding layers.
are Weaker layer/silt bed (SPT N60 < 30) - SPT sample through layer not
soil).not limited to:
- Select
component the relevant
load design
transfer standard.
(shaft friction/end-bearing).
– Potential founding - Pile loading
-- Settlement layer
of soft clay
-(axial
Main
- Potential (Rock/dense/hard
founding
compression,
or(Rock/
loose sand canhardcause
oftension,
layer load (Rock/
downdrag
transfer dense/
lateral, soil).
forces,ofi.e.
(shaft hard
moment. friction/end-bearing).
Example Borehole core showing embedded weaker layer inside
-Potential
Potential founding
- Settlement
- Main
founding layer
of •design
soft
component
layer See
clay
(Rock/ ofdense/
NZGS
or loose Ground
loadlayer
dense/ sand
transfer
hard •Model
soil).
can Refer
soil).cause
(shaft example
Poster.
downdrag
friction/end-bearing). ground
forces, i.e.profile with potential founding layers.
– Pile loading -(axial
Select
- -negative skin compression,
the - Potential
- Pile loading
relevant
friction (NSF).
founding
(axial tension,
compression,
standard. (Rock/ lateral,
dense/
tension, moment.
hard soil).
lateral, moment. Example ground profile. very dense gravel. Example Borehole core showing embedded weaker layer in
Pile loading
negative
Pile loading (axial
- (axial -
compression,
skin
Potential friction
founding
compression,
Pile loading (NSF).tension,
layer
(axialtension, lateral,
(Rock/ •
dense/
lateral,
compression,
moment.
Seemoment. hard soil).
NZGS
tension, Ground
lateral, Model
moment. Poster.
– Select the-- Earthquake-induced
relevant
- Settlement -design
Select
of soft the standard.
clay
ground relevant
or loosedesign
shaking. sand standard.
can cause downdrag forces, i.e. Example ground profile. very dense gravel.
-Select
Select -the
the relevant
Earthquake-induced design
- Pile- loading
relevant
- Settlementdesign
Select the
standard.
(axialground
standard.
relevant
ofground
softsand clay
shaking.
compression,
design
or loose
tension, lateral, moment.
standard.
sand can cause downdragforces, forces, i.e.
– Settlement ofnegative
-Settlement
soft
-- Liquefaction-inducedof
skin
clay
soft
friction
- Liquefaction-induced
Settlement -ofSelect
soft
or
clay lateral
the
clay or
(NSF).
loose
loose
relevant
or sand
lateral
loose design
sand
movement
can
ground
can
can
cause
movement
standard.
cause
cause
(e.g.
downdraglateral
downdrag (e.g.downdrag
spread).
forces,
lateral
forces, i.e.
spread).
i.e.
i.e. negative - Earthquake-induced
skin friction
- Liquefaction-induced negative Sskin
- Settlement tground
(NSF).
ground epfriction
2:soft
of De fincausing
clay
(NSF).
shaking.
settlement e loose
or geotNSF. echncan
sand icacausel scodowndrag
pe, hazaforces, rds, li.e.oad
negative skin friction
- Liquefaction-induced
- Settlement (NSF). ofskin ground
soft clay or settlement
loose sand causing NSF. downdrag forces, i.e.
negative
-- Piles
– Earthquake-induced
skin
in- slopes
Earthquake-induced
Piles in
friction
- with negative(NSF).
c a
Earthquake-induced
- Liquefaction-induced risk
ground
slopes of
ground
with s e s
lateral friction
a
instability
shaking.
shaking.
risk of n d
ground g (NSF).
e
ground
due
instability n
to e r Sltheavy
a
shaking.
movement
e.g.
due
e
r
toipscan
k2 s
(e.g.
e.g.
cause
:heavy
r D
e
rainfallleefvrainfall
lateral iand/or
n
a e
n tgfeoand/or
spread). orttehcehp nilceadl secsoigpne, hazards, load
- Earthquake-induced negative skin friction
ground
- Earthquake-induced shaking. (NSF). ground shaking.
- Liquefaction-induced
- Liquefaction-induced ground settlement lateral ground semovement
ccausing
a(e.g. NSF.
slateral
an(e.g. e(e.g.
d gspread). eralateral
nlateral spread).
l riskspread).
s relevant for the pile design
- -ground
– Liquefaction-induced shaking.
Liquefaction-induced
ground lateral
shaking. lateral ground
ground movement
movement
with•risk
- Earthquake-induced
Liquefaction-induced lateral
Typical
- Liquefaction-induced ground ground
movement
considerations shaking.
lateral (e.g.
groundoften lateral
include,
movement spread).
but
(e.g. are not spread).
lateral limited to:
- Piles in slopes - Liquefaction-induced of instability ground duesettlement
to e.g. heavy causing
rainfall NSF.and/or
• Note
– Liquefaction-induced that not
- -Liquefaction-induced
•ground -
Liquefaction-induced
Noteshaking.
thatall these
ground ground
Liquefaction-induced
notinall issues
-
ground Main
these are
settlement
settlement necessarily
lateral
component
settlement
issues causing
areground
of load
causing causing
NSF.
• settlement present
movement
transfer
necessarily NSF. (shaftat
NSF. any
(e.g. lateral spread).
friction/end-bearing).
- Liquefaction-induced
- Piles slopes with risk of ground
instability Typical topresent
dueconsiderations
causing
e.g. heavy atrainfall
NSF. anyoftenand/or
include, but are not limited to: Example
Examplepile damage
pile damage caused by lateral
caused ground
by lateral groundmovement.
movement.
specific
- -Piles
Pilesinin site.
slopes with risk ofof instability due toto e.g. -heavy rainfall and/or
– Piles in slopes with
specific
slopes risk
site.
with
- Piles
ground of
riskininstability
- Liquefaction-induced -slopes
shaking.
Potential
instability
with founding
ground
due
risk due layer
e.g.to
ofsettlement e.g.component
(Rock/
heavy
Main
instability heavy
dense/
causing
rainfall
due hard
NSF.
to e.g. rainfall
and/or
of soil).transfer
load
heavy (shaft friction/end-bearing).
rainfall and/or Photo from:from:
Photo HamadaHamada M (1991): Damage
M (1991): Damageto Piles by Liquefaction-
to Piles by Liquefaction-
•
• Assess Note
ground that
shaking.
pile
• Assess
not
-performance
Piles all these-
inperformance
slopes Pile
as issues
with loading
a risk
result are
(axial
of necessarily
compression,
these
asofainstability issues.
due
- Potential present
tension,
to e.g.
founding at any
lateral,
heavylayer moment.
rainfall
(Rock/and/or
dense/ hard soil). InducedExampleABOVE
Ground pile Example
Displacements.
damage pile
caused damage
3rdby3rd
U.S. caused
lateral groundby
Conference lateral
Lifeline
movement.
and/or ground ground shaking.
shaking.
specific•site.
pileground shaking. result of these issues. Example pile loading: structural and geotechnical
Induced
(due to identified
Ground
issues).
ground
Displacements.
movement. Photo
U.S.
from:
Conference
Hamada
Lifeline
M Liquefaction-
(1991):
Note that not all these
- Select the relevant design issues are necessarily
- Pilestandard.
loading (axial present at any
compression, tension, Example pile loading:
lateral, moment. structural Earthquake
and geotechnical (due Engineering,
to identified
Photo from:
Earthquake issues).
Hamada
Engineering,
Example ASCE,
pile Los Los
Mdamage
(1991):
ASCE, Angeles,
Damage USA,
Angeles,
caused by 1172-1181.
tolateral
Piles
USA, by
1172-1181.
ground movement.
• Note that••notNote
Refer
Note •that
all example
that
Refer not
thesenot
ground
•all
of
all
example these
issues
Note
specific
shaking.
pile
these of
that issues
loadingare
- issues
site. pile
notloading
allare
necessarily
and are necessarily
pile
these damage.
necessarily
and pile
issues present
present
present
damage.
are necessarilyat
atany
at any
any specific
present anysite.
at forces, Example pile
Damage damage to caused
Piles by by lateral ground
Liquefaction-Induced movement. Ground
• Assess pile performance Settlement as a of soft
result clay
of -or
theseloose
Select sand
issues.
the can
relevant cause
design downdrag
standard. i.e. Example
Induced pileGround
damage
Example
Photo from:caused
pile by lateral
Displacements.
damage
Hamada M 3rd ground
caused
(1991): by movement.
U.S. Damage
Conference
lateral Lifeline
toground
Piles movement.
by Liquefaction-
• Assess pilespecific
specificsite.
performance • Notespecific
site.
•specific
that
Assessof
as a
not
pile
result
all
site.
negative these
performance
of these
issues
skin friction are
as a(NSF).
issues.
- result
necessarily
Settlement of these
present
of soft issues.
at any Example pile loading:
clay or loose sand can cause downdrag forces, i.e. structural and Photo
geotechnical (due
Photo from:
to Hamada
Displacements.
identified
from:Example
Earthquake Hamada
Induced
M
issues). (1991):
3rd
M (1991):
pile
Engineering,
Photo damage
from:
Ground
Damage
U.S.
HamadaDamage
ASCE,caused
Los to
Conference Piles
to lateral
by
M (1991):
Displacements. Piles
Angeles,
3rd
by
by
DamageLiquefaction-
Lifeline
U.S.Liquefaction-
ground
USA, movement.
1172-1181.
to Piles
Conference byLifeline
Liquefaction-
• Refer
••Assess ofpile example
performance pile
site. loading
as aaresult and ofpile
of these damage. ABOVE
ExampleExample pilestructural
loading: and Induced
structural Ground
Earthquake
and geotechnical Displacements.
Engineering, 3rd U.S.
ASCE, Conference
Los Angeles,Lifeline
USA,
• Refer example Assess pile
pile •loading
performance
Assess pile and
as pile
result
- Earthquake-induced
performance damage. these
ground
as a issues.
issues.
shaking.
result
negative of these
skin friction issues.
(NSF). pile loading: geotechnical (due to identified issues).
Induced GroundPhoto
Example pile loading: structural and geotechnical (due to identified issues).
Displacements.
from: Hamada
Induced
Earthquake Ground M3rd U.S.
(1991): Conference
Displacements.
Engineering, ASCE, Damage
Los3rd toLifeline
U.S.
Angeles, Piles by Liquefaction-
Conference
USA, Lifeline
1172-1181.
••Refer • Refer
• Assess example
pileloading of
-performance
pile loading and
asdamage.
Liquefaction-induced a lateral
result pile damage.
of these
ground issues.
movement
Example
(e.g. shaking.
lateral spread).
pile loading:
(due to structural
identified and geotechnical
issues). (due to identified issues).
Example pile loading: structural and geotechnical (due to identified issues). Earthquake Engineering,
1172-1181.
EarthquakeInducedEngineering,
Ground
Earthquake ASCE,
ASCE, Los Angeles,
Los Angeles,
Displacements.
Engineering, USA,
3rd
ASCE, USA,
Los 1172-1181.
1172-1181.
U.S.Angeles,
Conference USA,Lifeline
1172-1181.
Referexample
example • of
ofpile
Referpile loading
example and
and
of pile
pile
pile
- Earthquake-induced
damage.
loading and pile damage.
ground
Example pile loading: structural and geotechnical (due to identified issues). Pile Pile
Step 3St:eSp•e3le:cS
t io n
lecotfi- oLiquefaction-induced
eexample pnilof
eoftpile
yppileloading
estypesand
ground settlement causing
- Liquefaction-induced NSF. driving Earthquake Engineering, ASCE, Los Angeles, USA, 1172-1181.
Refer pile damage. lateral ground movement (e.g. lateral spread). driving Rotary
Rotary
- Piles in slopes with risk- of instability due to e.g.
Liquefaction-induced heavysettlement
ground rainfall and/or
causing NSF. hammer
hammer head
Pile head
• Consider
Ste•pConsider 3structural
: Selstructural ectrequirements
ionground orequirements
f pishaking. le tand ypedemands s and- Piles demands ofslopes
in the of individ-
withtherisk individ-
of instability due to e.g. heavy rainfall and/or driving
STEP 3 : Selection of pile types
ual piles, Pile Rotary
ualbut piles, also but
Sletecptio3n:•oSfNote the also entire the
epleilcethat foundation
entire
titoyn foundation
osfallpthese concept.
ile tground yissues concept.
pes shaking. Pile
hammer driving
Pile
S t e p 3 : S e p not e are necessarily present at any Pile pile damage caused by lateral ground movement. head Rotary
S t e•
• Considerp 3
Consider :
• Consider S e
suitability l e c
structuralt
Stesuitabilityi o
p of n 3 the o f
:specific p
Sepile i
requirementsl
of the e t
ctype y
tiopile
site. p e s
ntootype f p•ito
and
suit lthe
esuit
demands tloading
ypthat es not
the of and
loading the individ-
and issues are necessarily present at any
driving
driving
Pile
Example
hammer
Piledriving Rotary
Rotary head
• Consider structural S requirements
t e p 3 : S e l e c t i o and n o f demands
p i l e t yNote
p e s of the all these hammer Pile Photo from: HamadaExample M (1991): Damage tocaused
Piles byby Liquefaction- Rotary
ual
groundground
••Consider
piles,
conditions. • but
Consider
conditions.also the entire
structural requirements foundation concept. andsite. demands of the individ- hammer
cushion hammer
driving pile damage lateral
head
head ground movement.
Consider structural
structural •suitability •
requirements
Assess
requirements pile and
performance
and demands
demands specific as of a
of the
result
the individ-
of
individ- these issues. cushion Induced Ground Displacements. Photo from: 3rd U.S. Conference
Hamada M (1991): KellyKelly to Piles head
Lifeline
Damage Rotary
by Liquefa
individual•piles, •
Consider but
Consider
• Consider also ual Considerthe
piles, entire
but of structural
alsopile
the foundation
thetype requirements
entire to foundation
suit concept.
the and
loading demands
concept. and of the individ- Example pile loading: structural and geotechnical (due to identified issues). hammer
Earthquake Engineering, ASCE, Los Angeles, USA, 1172-1181.
bar head
ual
ualpiles,
piles, •constructability
butbut Consideralso
alsoual the
constructability
the
piles, entire
•structural
entire
Refer
andexample
but site
foundation
foundation
also and
requirements constraints
the site
ofentire concept.
•concept.
constraints
pile Assess (e.g.pile
and
foundation
loading
low
demands
and (e.g. head- low
performance
concept.
pile ofhead-
damage. theas a result of these issues.
individ- Pile bar
Induced Ground Displacements. 3rd U.S. Conference Lifelin
• Consider suitability
••room,
ground limited
room, •ofconditions.
ual Considerthe
access,
limited piles,of
pile suitability
noise
access,
but
type
also andnoisethe
to of
vibration,and
entire
suit
the pilethe
vibration, type loading
etc.). Consider
foundation to
etc.). suit the and
Consider
concept. loading
pile pile and Example pile loading: structural and geotechnical (due to identified issues).
cushion Pile Earthquake Engineering, ASCE, Los Angeles, Kelly USA, 1172-11
Consider
Consider suitability
suitability•constructability
Consider onof
thethe pile
pile
suitability type
type ofto tothe suit
suit •pile the
Refer
thetype loadingexample
loading to suit and
and of pileloading loadingand and pile damage. Pile
ground conditions.
installation
• Consider
ground installation
conditions.
ground
effects effects conditions.
adjacent on adjacent
and structures. site structures.
constraints (e.g. lowthe head- Pile cushionPile bar Kelly
ground •
conditions. Consider ground suitability
conditions. of the pile type to suit the loading and cushion
cushion
Timber Timber cushion Kelly
• Consider •constructability
••Consider
Consider
• Consider
room, •ground
limited Consider
sustainability
constructability
and
access,
sustainability
conditions. site
impacts noise
constructability
and
constraints
impacts
site
ofand thevibration,
constraints
and
selected
of thesite (e.g.
selectedetc.).
constraints
pile
(e.g. low
low
Consider
types. pile types.
head-
(e.g. pilelow head-
pile pile
Pile
cushion
Kelly
bar
bar
Kelly
head-room, Consider
installation
limited
• Consider • Consider access,
Safety
• Consider
constructability
room, effects
in
Safety
limited
Design. Snoisetin e p
and
onconstructability
adjacent
access,
3
Design. and:
site constraints
S e l e
structures.
noise
vibration,
c t i o n
and
and site
o f p
(e.g.
vibration,
i etc.).
l e t y
low etc.).
constraints
p e s
head-Consider (e.g. low head- pile Pile bar Kelly bar
room,
room, limitedlimited • Consider access,
access,
room,constructability noise
noise
limited and and
access, vibration,
vibration, and site etc.).
etc.). Consider
constraints Consider(e.g. pile
pile low head- pile Timber driving Rotary bar
Consider •pile • Consider installation
sustainability effects impacts on ofnoise
adjacent theStselected and structures.vibration, pile types.etc.). Consider Pile
oininstallation
Jinstallation
tl•y/Jcooinllatlroom,
installation effects
byeffects effects
beon
ltliavlimited
/ocroainstallation ly•rasadjacent
oon adjacent
teivleaccess, yton
ecleffects p fadjacent
serelestructures. structures.
ecnoise
tronrperdeadjacent fpeand ete structures.
pppei3
dyvibration,
irlerrequirements ew:tityS
lstructures. hpe esltw e uc
etc.).
rand ttiuosrtConsider
itch narulocftupraillepile types pile hammerTimber driving head
n•giConsider
• Consider sustainability
••eConsider neern,gsustainability
• Consider
ecro,impacts
edSafety
ininstallation
asustainability an
n trdain
Consider
sustainability
cctooDesign.effects
nimpacts fof cptosthe
t(riapiles,
rimpacts ron
structural
s(butiof
of fbadjacent
p
lthe
ethe
impacts
selected
oalso
-ssoselected
itselected
bhthe
ler-w
of
oisthepile
structures. the
epileruw
jpile
selected
sitstypes. types.
e
demands
pile
ejaucsht roeuconcept.
rtypes. arch our
types.of the individ- Timber
Timber pile
Timber hammer
Temporary
Temporary steelsteel
casingcasing
Consider • Consider ual sustainability •
impacts entire
Consider of foundation
the selected
structural pile types. and demands of the individ-
requirements pile (for excavation stability)
/g•ccu
to•a Jcooinltin loetlayaDesign. o llllfeaoabrgosuroaem fivoeSafety
rhlsyeoslm pe)le.einchteDesign. pile (for excavation stability)
plpr)impacts
e. ferredofual
• Consider Safety Timberpile
oeConsider
Consider•Safety
••Consider Consider ininDesign. t• eConsider
sustainability pof ilepiles,
the tpile
ypselected
etype withalso
but tostsuit
rpile
uthe
ctthe uentire
raloading
types.l foundation and concept.
• Refer e•nexamples
• Jointly/collaboratively
Safety
inee•r,examples
gRefer J
•aoselect
Consider
n
i n dtlycpile
of
Design.
ocnotrlof
/ laacSafety
preferred
b tora(construction.
pile
construction. t fvin
suitability
peolyDesign.
iconditions.
i sspile iblelect- type
e o
p
the
trheeferw r r with
eisde pjuilset tryepaecw h iothurstructural
pile
Pile Temporary steel casing
••JJooininttotlyly/a/ccoo•lllalConsider
aebba oraotetiivnifvetoellryySafety
e•ognJruga neelry/,sco
icontractor
ground
sseom
ae
leaccbtin
nllde
prDesign.
chtoepn
rlare
p ertf)iae
t(if
eyedsdeppli•elielceConsider
f.vecrepossible
rtrlro r (if poground ttstypysprpieb
e–elfw wri-tritheosuitability
eotherwise hd t
sstptrru
h e iruw
le is e
of
ccttuyurpraaejlulthe
w
s titrh
pile type to suit the loading and
easct r
h ucotuurr al
Examples
Examples
cushion of construction:
of construction: Pile(fordrivendriven
timber
excavation timber
Temporary
pile pile
(left)(left)
stability)
steel casing Kelly
structural engineer, and
eenngginineeeerr,•,aanJnoddinccetolonynn/gtctrin aoaec•lcltetoConsider
r ( if p o s s i b l
constructability e - o t h e r w i s e
and ju conditions.
ssite t r e a c h
constraintso u r Typical
(e.g. low
Typical
pile
head-
pile
types types
used used
in New in New Zealand.
Zealand. and bored pile
and bored pile (right;cushion(right;
photo photo
Temporary
Temporary by
by Martin
steel
steelMartin
casing
(forcasing Larisch).
Larisch).
excavation stability) bar
t o a c o rl l a o r ( i f p
b,uoaernafdtoivrceosln
r
g o s s
y tm
o i b
sra l e
eecleh t- o t h e r w
coetrlp(i)rf.epfeorsrsid i s e b j u
l e s t r e a c h o u r
pil-eotyhpeerwwisiteh jsutsrturcetuarcahl our Temporary steel casing
just reach out ttoo•aaRefer
to
ccoolla leleacolleague
examples
a ggeuuneegfito fnorerasesorcoof ,m om efor
pile
alelnroom, dhahegceluoplsome ).t.froarcstoorhelp).
construction.
pen)limited m
access,
(ief ph•oeslConsider
psnoise
) i.ble -and hevibration,
rwise jusetc.).
otconstructability t reandacConsider
h site pile
our constraints (e.g. low head-
(for excavation
(for excavation
Examples of construction:
stability)
drivenstability)
(fortimber
Temporary steelpile
excavation casing(left)
stability)
il•4
installation effects on adjacent structures.
• Refer examples
••tRefer
S eRefer of:ePppile
p 4Sexamples
texamples etoRefer :aP
•DRefer
construction.
ecofioof examples
slelilpile D
gepileageu
n eigfonr of
sconstruction.
construction. som pile e hconstruction.
elp). room, limited access, noise andTypical vibration,pileetc.).
types used inpile
Consider New Zealand.
ABOVE
and boredExamples
Examples Examples
of
pile (right; of photo (for
by excavation
construction:
of construction:
Martin stability)
Larisch).
driven
driven
timber pile (left)
timber pile
•examples
Consider of pile construction.
sustainability installation
impacts of effects
the selected on adjacent structures.
pile types. Typical pile types used in New Zealand. Timber
Examples ofconstruction:
construction:
andExamples
bored pile ofdriven
driven timber
timber
construction:
(right; photo by
pile
pile (left)
(left)
driven
Martin timber pile (left)
Larisch).
• Axial •pile Axial •design: Refer
pile design: examples
consider consider
where of pile where construction.
resistances resistances are derived are derived
from from Typical pile types
ABOVE
Typical pile types used
Typicalin
usedpile
Typical New
pile
in New
typesZealand.
types
Zealand.
used used
in New in New Zealand.
Zealand. andpile bored
(left)
and and
bored pile
bored
pile(right;
pile
(right;
Examples photo
(right;
photo
Timber
of byby Martin
photo
construction:Martin Larisch).
by Martin
Larisch).
driven Larisch).
timber pile (left)
Stefriction,
p(skin 4 : friction, Pend-bearing
ile Deend-bearing • Consider
signor combined?), Safety in •
Design.Consider sustainability impacts of the selected pile types. •
• Standards, codes and and
Standards, codes and
and bored
guidelines,
guidelines, pile
pile
which which
(right;
can
canphoto
photo
be
be used used
by Martin
for pile
for pile Larisch).
de-
Larisch).
de-
(skin or combined?), including including associated associated Typical pile types used in New Zealand. bored pile (right; by Martin
SteDpe 4ig: n •P Jiole intD /ecsoilg
lyappropriate lan borativGeotechnical • Consider
ely seleStrength ct prefeStrengthSafety in Design.
rred pile type with structural sign in New
sign in New Zealand: Zealand:
44displacements.
SStdisplacements.
tee•ppAxial ::Ppile PiFactors
Reduction ile leS D
design: Apply
teesp s(typically
i4gconsider
Factors
Apply
appropriate
n:ePng(typically
ilie eD
nderived erwhere e, asniderived
Geotechnical
gfrom
d ncresistances
ont• ra f/pcare
cJotoinr t(liyAS2159)
from ooto sllsaderived
ibbolerato tehlfrom
-toivassesseyrsweisleecjtupsrterfeearrcehdopuirle type with structural - NZ•-Building
NZ BuildingCode Code Temporary steel casing
Reduction AS2159) assess Standards, codes and guidelines, (for which can bestability)
used for pile de-
•
STEP 4 : Pile Design (skin friction, end-bearing or combined?), including associated excavation
••the S
thedesign: t e
ultimate p
Axial 4 :
pile P i
pilecapacityl e
design:
t o
axial D
a ce o sl l ie
capacity g
consider
a n g u e fo r
using where
s o m e h
eangrisk-based resistances
e l p ) .
r, and approach. are derived from
•  S tandards, codes and guidelines, Temporary steel casing
Axial
Axialultimate
pile
pile
displacements. design: pile
•
(skin Axial
axial
consider
consider
Apply
pile
friction,
where
design: where
appropriate
end-bearing
using resistances
resistances
consider
a risk-based
Geotechnical
or where
combined?),
ineederived
areare approach.
derived
resistances Strength
cofromntractor (if possible - otherwise just reach our
from
including are derived
associated from - AS
sign
- AS 2159-2009 •
2159-2009
in New Piling
Zealand:
Standards, -
Piling - Design Design
codesand and guidelines, which
installation
andinstallation which can can be for stability)
be excavation
used pile de-
Consider
(skin Consider
friction, pile group pile effects
end-bearing group
• Refer effects
or and examples
combined?), potential and of potentialdowndrag
pile including a cdowndrag
to construction. olleaforces. gue foforces.
associated r some help). •• Standards,
Standards, codes
•
codes and
and guidelines,
guidelines, which
which can
can be
be used
used for
for
(for
pile
pile de-
de-
(skin
• Axial pile design:
friction,
Reduction •
consider
Axial end-bearing
pile friction,
Factors
(skin
displacements. design:
where (typically orconsider combined?),
end-bearing
Apply
resistances derived appropriate where from or including
are
resistances
AS2159)
combined?),Geotechnical
derived
associated
toare assess
includingderived
Strength
from
from
associated
(skin - NZGS
sign- -NZGS
NZ
used Building
for
Module
Module
ininNew 4
Standards,
sign
pile
-
Zealand:
in
Code
4 New
-design
Examples codes
Zealand:
Earthquake
Earthquake in
of and
New
Resistant
Resistant
guidelines,
Zealand:
construction: Foundation
Foundation
which
driven timber
Design
canpilebe(left)
Design used for pile de-
• Lateral •
displacements.
displacements.
the pile Lateral
ultimate (skin
design: pile Apply
Apply design:
friction,
pile
displacements.
Reduction consider
axialappropriate
appropriate consider
end-bearing
Factorscapacity whether Apply(typically
Geotechnical
whether
Geotechnical
using •
or combined?),
the
appropriate aground the
Refer
risk-based
derived
Strength
ground
examples
Strength
isfrom imposing
Geotechnical is
including
approach.
AS2159)imposing
of pile
a associated a
construction.
Strength
to assess
Typical pile types used in New Zealand. sign •
New Zealand:
Standards,
sign in
and
- NZ Building codes
Newbored
Code and
Zealand:
pile guidelines,
(right; photo
Examples which
by Martincan be used
Larisch). for pile
of construction: driven timber de- pile (left)
friction, end-bearing
Reduction loadFactors or
(ground combined?),
(typically
pushing derived
against including
from
the AS2159) associated to assess displacements. –
- NZ AS NZ
- -Auckland
Building Building
2159-2009Structural
Code
- Auckland Code
Piling - Design
Group
sign
Structural Pilingand
- in
NZNew Group installation
Specification
Zealand:
Piling
CodeSpecification
Reduction
load (ground
Consider Factors
displacements.
pushing
pile
the (typically
group
Reduction
ultimate against
effects derived
Apply
Factors
pile the and
axial appropriate
pile) orpile)
from
potential
(typically
capacity providingor
AS2159) providing
Geotechnical
downdrag
derived
using to
aresistance
from resistance
assess
forces.
risk-based Strength
AS2159) to assess
approach. Typical pile types used in New Zealand. - NZ Building Code
- ASBuilding
Building
2159-2009 PilingResistant and bored pile (right; photo by Martin Larisch).
the
Apply appropriate theultimate
ultimate pile
(pileGeotechnical
pushing
pile axial into
axial capacity
ground).
capacity Strength usingAssess
using acapacity
a risk-based
the
Reduction
risk-based pile headapproach.
approach.fixity
Factors andto check
(typically AS– 
- -AS AS 2159-2009
-(Construction
NZGS
2159-2009 Module
- NZ Piling
4 - Earthquake
specification)Code – -installation
Design
Design and
and installation
Foundation installation
Design
(pile
• pushing
Lateral
Consider pile
lateral
Reduction
pile
into the
Consider
group
ground).
design:
displacement
ultimate
S Factors
effects
pile
t e p Assess
4
consider pile
group
and :
limits.
(typically
P axial
i l ethe
effects
whether
potential D
Consider
pile
e s derived
iand
g head
n
the
downdrag
pile
from
fixity
using
potential
ground
group
a AS2159)
and check
risk-based
downdrag
iseffects.
forces. imposing a
assess
approach.
forces. (Construction
2159-2009 - AS 2159-2009 and
Piling
specification)
Piling - -Design
Design and
Piling installation
- Design and installation
derived from Consider
lateral
AS2159) piletheto
displacement group
ultimate
Consider
assesseffects
limits. pile
piletheand
axial
Consider
group potential
capacity
ultimate pile group
effects downdrag
using
and
pile aaxial
effects.
potential forces.
risk-based downdrag
capacity approach. forces.
using • – 
- N ZGS
Auckland
Selected - NZGS
Module
Structural
software, Module
which 4
Group – 4
can - Earthquake
Earthquake
Piling
be used Resistant
Specification
for Resistant
pile design: Foundation Design
load (ground •Consider
Lateral pushing pile
• Axial againstconsider
design: the pile) Swhether
tor
epotential
pproviding
4where: Pthe ildowndrag
eresistances
Designisforces.
resistance
ground imposing a from • Selected
- -NZGS
NZGSModule -
Module-44
software,AS 2159-2009
-which
NZGS-Earthquake
Earthquakecan be4
Module
Piling used -
ResistantDesign
Resistant for pile
- Earthquake
and
Foundation installation
design:
Foundation
Resistant Design
Design
Foundation Design
a risk-based•••Perform
Lateral• Perform
Lateral
approach.
(pile pile
pile
pushingdesign:
design:
load Consider
soil-structure-interaction
into
Lateral(ground
pile
consider
• soil-structure-interaction
consider
ground).
grouppile
pilepushing
(skin
whether
pile
design:
effects
design:the
whether
Assess
friction, group
(SSI)consider
against
and
consider
the
end-bearing
ground
(SSI)
analysis ground
effects
pile
the toiscombined?),
analysis
head
whether
pile) isimposing
assess
or different
to assess
imposing
and
fixity
or the and
ground
providing
acheck
potential
the a the
are derived
is imposing
resistance
including associated a - -RSPile- RSPile
Auckland Foundationby
(Construction - Auckland
by•Rocsience Rocsience
-Standards,
NZGS
Structural
Structural
Design (vertical,
specification)
(vertical,
Modulecodes
Group - lateral
and
4Piling Group
lateralandand
guidelines,
EarthquakeSpecification
Piling
group
which
ResistantSpecification
group cananalysis)
analysis)
be used for pile
Foundation de-
Design
load
load load/deflection
(ground
lateral• displacement
(ground
load/deflection pushing
Lateralpushing
(pile behaviour
load pile
(ground
pushing
behaviour
against
against of
design:
limits.
into
the
the of
theground).
pushing
the
pile)
pile)
pile under
consider
Consider oror
against•
pile
whether
pile
Assess
under
providing
Axial
providing
differentpile
group
the the thepile
pile) resistance
design:
resistance
load
ground
effects.
or
load
consider
cases
providing
head
cases
isfixity
imposingwhere
resistance
and a
checkresistances are derived from - Auckland
-Selected
AllPile
Structural
by
sign - Auckland
Civiltech
in New
(Construction
Group
(vertical
Zealand:
Piling
Structural and
specification)
Specification
Group
lateral Piling
analysis) Specification
downdrag forces.(pile (collaboration displacements.
between structural Apply and appropriate
geotechnical Geotechnical
engineers Strength •
- AllPile –  SbyESOC/
Civiltechsoftware,NZGS
(vertical
which Piling
and •canStandards,
Specification
lateral
be codes
analysis)
used and guidelines, which can be used for pile
for Specification
pile design:
(pilepushing
pushing
(collaboration load into
into
between
lateral
ground).
ground).
(ground
(pile pushing Assess
Assess
structural
displacementpushing into Factorsandthe
the
against
ground).
limits.
pile
pile head
(skin
geotechnical
the head
Assess
Consider
fixity
friction,
fixity
pile)derivedor
the and
engineers
pile and
providing
pile
group
check
end-bearing
check
head
or
resistance
fixity and
effects.
combined?),
check
including associated (Construction
(Construction - specification)
Auckland Structural
specification)
(Construction Group
specification) Piling
• Lateral pile is •critical
Perform
design:
lateral
lateral is critical
displacement soil-structure-interaction
consider
displacement
for for
thislateral
(pile this
task).
pushing
Reduction
whether
task).
limits.
limits.
Note
into
displacement
Note
Consider
Consider
that
ground). the
that
several
(SSI)
pile
pile
(typically
ground
several
Assess
limits.
analysis
displacements.
group
group
iterations the
Consider
is
iterations
effects.
effects.
pilemay
toimposing
pile be
head
from
assessApply
may
group
AS2159)
the
be
fixity a load
appropriate
and
effects.
to assess
check Geotechnical Strength - -GROUP
••- Selected
GROUP RSPile •- NZ
by Ensoftby
(Constructionby
Building
Ensoft
Selected
Rocsience
(vertical
(Construction
software, which
Code pile
(vertical
software,(vertical,
pile sign
group
specification)
specification)
can be
which in
group New
can
lateral
analysis)Zealand:
analysis)
be used
and groupforanalysis)
pile design:
required.•
load/deflection Perform Refer behaviourthe ultimate of
soil-structure-interaction
example pile the pile pile
actions axial under capacity
Reduction
from different
(SSI)
LPile. using
Factors
analysis a risk-based
load tocases
(typically
assess approach.
derived
the from AS2159) to assess Selected
- -LPile by - AS •
software, 2159-2009
Selected
Ensoft which
(lateral can
Piling
software, -be
analysis) - used
NZ used
Design
which for
Buildingfor
andpile
canCode
pile design:
design:
installation
be used forgroup
pile design:
(ground pushing
••Perform
required. against
Referlateral examplethe
displacement
soil-structure-interaction pile)
pile
Consider or
actions providing
limits.
pile (SSI) from
group LPile.
Consider
analysis
effects resistance
to pile
and assess group
potential the (pile
effects.
downdrag pushing forces. - LPile
•  S AllPile
by Ensoft
elected by - RSPile
Civiltech
(lateral
software,
by Rocsience
(vertical
analysis) which and (vertical,
lateral
can be
lateral
analysis)
used
and
for
analysis)
Perform
(collaboration
• Develop • Perform
soil-structure-interaction
between
load/deflection structural
soil-structure-interaction
behaviour (SSI) and analysis
of thethe to
ultimate
geotechnical
pile(SSI) assess
under pile the
axial
engineers
analysis
different capacity
to assess
load cases using
Sithe aS id e :
risk-basedSkin/shaft
de: Skin/shaft friction approach. friction - RSPile
- RSPile
- -CPeT-IT•
by Rocsience
Selected
by- NZGS
Rocsience
by - RSPile
Module
GeoLogismiki
(vertical,
software,
(vertical,
by 4Rocsience - ASlateral
which
- Earthquake
(single lateral canand
2159-2009and be
(vertical,
pile
group
used
group
Resistant
vertical Pilinganalysis)
for pile
analysis)
lateral - Design
Foundation
capacity design:
and installation
andcalculation)
group analysis)
Design
into ground).
• DevelopAssess
load/deflection
load/deflection
pile
is critical the
• Perform
sizes,
for
pile
thispile
sizes,
behaviour
behaviour
which•
load/deflection head
task).
which
of
of
comply thefixity
the
soil-structure-interaction
Lateral Note pile
comply
pile
pile
with
thatdesign:
behaviour and
underwith
under
geotechnical
several check
geotechnical
different
consider different
Consider
(SSI)
iterations
of theand lateral
pile
and load
analysis
whether
pilegeotechnicalload
under
and
groupcases
struc-
may cases
theto
bedisplacement
struc-
effects
assess
ground
different andthe
is potential
imposing
loadBacases B a s
adowndrag
e : End-bearing forces. - CPeT-IT
- -AllPile GROUP
by - AllPile
by
GeoLogismiki Ensoft by(vertical
Civiltech
(single (vertical
pile
pile group
vertical and lateral
analysis)
capacity analysis)
calculation)
(collaboration
(collaboration
tural requirements,between
between
codes
structural andand
structural
standards
geotechnical (e.g. pile
engineers material, engineers se: End-bearing pileby
AllPile by-Civiltech
design:
-Civiltech
RSPile- Pile (vertical
by
AllPile Rocsience
(vertical
byEnsoft and
and
Civiltech-(only
lateral
NZGS(vertical,
lateral
(verticalanalysis)
Module lateral
analysis)
and
4 and group
lateral
- Earthquake analysis)Foundation Design
analysis)
Resistant
limits. Consider pile
(collaboration
tural requirements,
required. group between
load/deflection
Refer effects.
codes
example
(collaboration
is critical structural
load and standards
behaviour
(ground
pile
for this between task). and
pushing
actions Noteofgeotechnical
(e.g.
the
from
•iterations
structural
that pile
pile
against
Lateral LPile.under
severaland the engineers
material,
pile design: different
pile) or
geotechnical
iterations considerload
providing
may cases
resistance
engineers
be
whether the ground is imposing a P l o t c o lo
Plot colours indicate differentu r s i n d ic a t e d i f fe r e n t
• GRLWEAP • GRLWEAP
- LPilebyby Auckland
-byGROUP
Ensoft Structural
by
Dynamics
(lateral Group
analysis)(vertical
forPiling
thepileSpecification
group
assessment analysis)
of pile
size, size,
isiscritical
diameter,
critical for
for diameter,
this task).
spacing
this task). spacing
Note
and
Note
(pile thatand
required
that
pushing required
several
several
intoembedment embedment
iterations
ground). may
depths).
Assess may depths).
be
the bepile head fixity and Scheck
idore:providing
Skin/shaft friction load cases, et.ge.ralal tleoraadl load
- - GROUP
– RSPile
GROUP
drivabilityby-Pile
Ensoft
AllPile
--by by
Ensoft Dynamics
- GROUP (vertical
by Civiltech
aRocscience
(vertical by
(only
pile
pile
Ensoft
for
group theanalysis)
(vertical
group
(vertical
assessment
(vertical,andpile
analysis)lateral
lateral
group
of pile
analysis)
and
analysis)
anot design tool).
• Perform soil-structure-interaction (collaboration
issizes,
required. critical Refer between
for this (SSI)
example task). structural
analysis
Note
pile loadthat
actions and to geotechnical
several
(ground from assess the
iterations
LPile.
pushing engineers
load/
against may be
the pile) (Construction
LPile by tool).
Ensoft - Auckland
specification)
(lateral Structural
analysis) Group Piling Specification
• Develop
required.
•
required. Refer
Refer
pile example
example
which
pile
lateral comply
actions
displacement
piletask).actions
with
from
from
geotechnical
LPile.
limits.
LPile. Consider and pile struc-
group effects. BExample
apile
seload
: head loadresistance
End-bearing (or resistance-displacement plot. load caapspelise,dea.gt.pla i le h e a d .
drivability
- - CPeT-IT
LPile by- Ensoft
not - GROUP GeoLogismiki
design
(lateral
by analysis)
Ensoft (single
(vertical pile
pile vertical
group capacity
analysis) calculation)
deflection•behaviour
Consider
Consider
•
is
Safety
tural requirements, of
Develop
Safety
critical
required.
the
in for
Design.
in
pile
pile
Design.
this
Refer
codes under
sizes,
example
and which
Note
different
standards
that
pile
comply
(pile several
actions
pushing
load
(e.g.
with pile
iterations
from into
cases LPile.
material,
geotechnical
ground).may be
Assess
(collaboration
and
Example
struc- S idthe
e :Figure
Skin/shaft
(or
S id
sourced
e
SIDE:resistance-displacement
:
fixity Skin/shaft
friction Skin/shaft
and
from: check
NZGS
friction
friction
Module 4–
plot. applied at pile head. - LPile group
by• Ensoft analysis)
Selected
- CPeT-IT
(lateral
- LPile by
software,
by
analysis)
Ensoft which
GeoLogismiki (lateral
(Construction
can be analysis)
used
(single specification)
for pile
pile design:
vertical capacity calculation)
• Develop • Preparepile required.
sizes, which• Perform
Refer example
comply with pile actions
lateral
(ifgeotechnical from
displacement
and LPile.
struc- limits. Consider S
Figureid e :
pileSkin/shaft
sourced
group B from:
a Ss i
ed friction
effects.:e : NZGS
Skin/shaft
End-bearing Module 4–
friction P lo t c o l o u r s i n d ic a t e d if fe r e n t - • GRLWEAP
CPeT-IT by - by Pile
GeoLogismiki
LPile by Dynamics
Ensoft (single
(lateral (only
pile for the
vertical
analysis) assessment
capacity of pile
calculation)
••Prepare
soil-structure-interaction (SSI) analysisand to assess BBaasseethe BASE: End-bearing - CPeT-IT by- RSPile
GeoLogismiki by (single pile vertical andcapacity calculation)
between structuralDevelop
size, pile
adiameter,
and
producer •sizes,
turalaDevelop
producer
which
spacing
requirements,
geotechnical
statement pilestatement
comply
and
sizes,(if with
required
which
codes
engineers
required),
required),
geotechnical
andembedment
complyastandards
pile is acritical
with
design
pile
and design
struc-
depths).
geotechnical
(e.g. pile material,
for different
this task). struc-
Earthquake
Earthquake
: :End-bearingSideB: aResistant
End-bearing
Resistant Skin/shaft
s e :
Foundation
friction
End-bearing
Foundation Design.
Design.
Example lExample
oad pile casebendingPpile
sl,oet .bending go. loamoment
c u lnldoiacdate differen t – 
tersraimoment AllPile
drivability• - by
not
GRLWEAP
Civiltech
- CPeT-IT
by Rocsience
a designby Pile
• Selected
tool).(vertical
GeoLogismiki
(vertical,
Dynamics
(single
lateral
software,
(only for
lateral
andpilegroup
which
the
cananalysis)
verticalbe capacity
analysis)
assessment
calculation)
used for pile
of pile
design:
tural
tural requirements,
•
report,
requirements,Developincluding
tural codes
codes
pile
requirements, and
load/deflection
drawings,
sizes,and standards
which technical
standards codes
behaviour
comply • (e.g.
and pile
of
specification,
(e.g.
Performwith pile
standards
thematerial,pile
material, under
general
soil-structure-interaction
geotechnical (e.g. and
pile struc-
material,
load
(SSI)casesanalysis
Figure
Example to assess
6.2,Section
load (or the page 49.
6.2,
resistance-displacement plot. P lo t c o
actionsl o u r s i
with n d i c a
depth t e d if f
frome r e n t
LPile. • GRLWEAP by - AllPile
CPeT-IT
Pile by
Dynamics GeoLogismiki
(only for (single
the pileanalysis)
assessment vertical
of capacity
pile lateral calculation)
•
report,
Note that several
size, including
Consider iterations
diameter,
size,
Safety
spacing
diameter,
drawings,
in mayDesign. spacing
technical
be
(collaboration
and required required. and
between
embedment
required
specification, Refer
structural
embedment
general
example
depths). and
depths).
geotechnicalpile actions
Figure
engineers 6.2,Section BasABOVE
e: End-bearing
6.2, page
Example 49. load (or P l
actionso t
a c
p o
p lo
withie u
d r sa
depth li
ton padP idi
llc
e o a
c th
from t
a e
c soad
eldo
sif.
u
,f e
r
e
LPile. r
s
. e
gi.n lt
d
a i
tce ar tael ldo if
a•fe
d r e n– 
GRLWEAP
t G ROUP -
by • Pile by
GRLWEAP
drivability
by Civiltech
Ensoft
Dynamics - notby a
(vertical
(only
Pile - RSPile
(vertical
design for
Dynamics
and
by
the
tool).
lateral
Rocsience
pile(only group
assessment for (vertical,
the analysis)
of pile
assessment and group analysis)
of pile
notestural
size, diameter, and size,pilediameter,
spacing schedule.
requirements, and required codes and
spacing andload/deflection
embedment standards
required
Note thatembedment
(e.g.behaviour
depths). pile material, of the pileFigure
depths). under sourced different
Example load
from: loadcases
NZGS Module 4–resistance- loloplot.
(or resistance-displacement aaddccaasseess,P ,ePlot
ela.og.ptg.lp.ocla terarlsslleoiln
colours
lloaiaeldtodeucraa
aa,indicate
t posild
diec.agt.eladtieffrearlelo
ed ndrivability •- -GRLWEAP
not
- not
GROUP aadesign byby tool).
Ensoft
notes and pile
• Prepare
from LPile.• Consider •size, schedule.
aConsider
producer
is critical
Safety
statement in for
Design. this task).
(if required), (collaboration
aembedment
pile design
several
between iterations
structural may
Example
andbe geotechnical
load (or resistance-displacement
displacement
engineers plot. Figure plot.
sourced head. tdrivability
a d LPile
– design
bydrivability
Ensoft not(vertical
tool).
Pile a- AllPile
Dynamics
- (lateral design pile
analysis)
group
by(only
tool). foranalysis)
Civiltech (vertical
the and lateral
assessment analysis)
of pile
• Consider Safety diameter,
ininDesign. spacing and required depths). Example
Earthquake load (or
Example
Figure resistance-displacement
Resistant sourced Foundation
load (or
from: NZGS Design. plot. 4– aappppplot.
resistance-displacement
Module lExample
ileieddaattpp ioldifferent
i ela
pile
e hahecpebending
a a d d .e.sd,load cases,
moment
report,which
Safety
• •
including Consider Design. required.
drawings, Safety Refer
in
technicalDesign. example is pile actions
critical
specification, for this from
generaltask). LPile.
Note that Figure
several sourced
iterations from:
from: may NZGS
NZGSbe Module
Module 4–
4 – Earthquake l d ap s lie ae .
t gp. il a
e t e
h r
ea a ldlo. a d drivability
- LPile by - not
Ensoft a(lateral
design
- GROUP tool).
analysis) by Ensoft (vertical pile group analysis)
• Develop pile sizes, Prepare comply a producer with geotechnical
statement (if required), and a structural
pile design FigureFigure sourced Example from:
6.2,Section
Figure
Earthquake NZGS
load 6.2,(or
sourced Module
Resistantfrom: 4–
resistance-displacement
page 49. NZGS
Foundation Module 4–
Design. plot. actions e.g.
with lateral
depth load
from LPile. –  C PeT-IT by GeoLogismiki (single pile vertical
Stepaa•and
••Prepare Considerstatement
producer •Safety in Design.
(if S id e : Skin/shaft friction apExample plied at ppile ile hbending
ead. moment
:•Tpile (ifCrequired), aiaopile
crequired. design
oRefer oexample pile actions from LPile.
Earthquake Resistant
ReactionResistantframe Foundation
Foundation Design.
Design. Figure - CPeT-IT by GeoLogismiki - LPile(single
by Ensoft pile (lateral
vertical analysis)
capacity calculation)
e•5 ieledrawings,
sstandards
st aincluding
Pstatement
ilDevelop
easproducer
d Catechnical
ndrawings,
ndsstatement orequired),
cnspecification,
tsspecification,
trtechnical
onu tmaterial,
ncomply
itM nwith
nigsizes,
tsize,
rigeotechnical
nagpile
Prepare
notes producer schedule. pile sizes, which pile design and struc-
Earthquake
ReactionFigure Resistant sourcedse:Foundation
from: NZGSDesign. Example
Examplepile bending moment
requirements, p 5codes
Stereport, : including
Tincludingtand
sPreparePPrepare
report, a n otechnical (e.g. statement
tdrawings,
ru ipile M o (if
n required),
ospecification,
rgeneral
ispecification,
general
design
general
diameter, Figure 6.2,Section
frameEarthquake
Figure
6.2,
B a6.2,Section
6.2,
Section page
Resistant
End-bearing
49.
6.2,
6.2,
page S
LoadiModule
Foundation
page :49.
decells 4–Design.
Skin/shaft
and jacks friction pileapplied bending
actions Example at
with moment
pile
pile
depth head.
bending from LPile. momentcapacity calculation)
report, notes report,drawings,
and tural
pile requirements,
producer
including schedule. •codes
(if
technical
Develop and
required), standards
pile a pilewhich (e.g.
design pile material,
general
comply Figure 6.2,Section
with geotechnical Earthquake
Figure and 6.2, page
Resistant
struc-
6.2,Section 49.
Load cells49.
Foundation
6.2, and jacks
page 49.Design. actions
actions with
with depth
Example depth
P l o
actions t c from
o from
l o u
pile r s LPile.
with LPile.
i n d
bending ic
deptha t e d i f
moment
fromf e r e n t
LPile. • GRLWEAP by Pile - CPeT-IT
Dynamics by GeoLogismiki
(only for the (singleofpile
assessment pilevertical capacity calcu
spacing andnotes required
and embedment depths). Base: End-bearing
notes andpile
• Consider pile
report, schedule.
schedule.
pile
notes load
including
andsize, diameter,
and/or
piledrawings,pile integrity
schedule. spacing
technicaltural and
testing required for your
specification,
requirements, embedment
project.
codesgeneral and depths).
standards (e.g. pile material,
Figure 6.2,Section 6.2, page 49. ABOVE
actions load cwith asExample
es,depthe.g. lafrom tpile ot acdolo• 
eraPllolLPile. ursGinRLWEAP differeby
dicatedrivability Pile
nt- not Dynamics
a design tool). by (only for the(only for the assessment of pile
• Consider pile load and/or pile integrity testing for your project. Example load (or resistance-displacement plot. • GRLWEAP Pile Dynamics
• Consider Safety in
Ste•pPile 5 Design.notes
Test and
:integrity ile•pile
Ptesting sConsiderschedule.
an(e.g.
d Clow o nstrain
Safety strin tisize,
ucDesign. on M
integrity diameter, nitorispacing
otesting ng or and required embedment depths).
(PIT)
Reaction frame applied amoment
bending t pile head. load cases, e.g. lateral load
assessment of pile drivability drivability - not – not a designa design
tool). tool).
Figure sourced
frame from: NZGS
cellsModule 4–resistance-displacement plot.
• Prepare a•producer
Pile integrity LoadExample and jacks
load (or
SStCross
e p 5 Cross
: T e ttesting
Ssstatement
t ePpil5
hole
e s:(e.g.
sonic T•n
a slow
ePrepare
logging
d CPostrain
t(if irequired),
lneare r u
integrity
asstproducer
aused a testing
ncdtioCto•nostatement
nM spile
Consider
assess trnuictthe
o ot(PIT)
i(if
design
roin
Safety or
nrequired),
Minoreport,
integrity
g n iof
toathe
Design. rpile
ingincluding
design Reaction Reaction frame
frame
Reaction
Earthquake Resistant Foundation
Figure sourced
Load Design.
from:
cells and NZGS
jacks Module
actions with depth applied at pile head.
Example 4– pile bending moment
te•pConsider
drawings, technical 5hole: Teshaft).
pile sS
sonic t tPelogging
pile iplload
e5s a:and/ornTare
d
esCtusedoPpile
nilsetto sruassess
acntdrawings,
integrity ido•nCtesting
Mnosintegrity
othe n riufor
taocproducer
ttechnical rtyour
inogof theonitoring
nspecification,
M
project. Reaction frame from LPile.
pile shaft). specification, general notes and pile schedule.
report, including statementgeneral Figure 6.2,Section Load6.2,cells and
andjacks
page 49. actions
S•teConsider
p 5testing
: Tepile
snotes
t(e.g.
Pload
ileandsand/or
astrain
ndschedule.
Cpile
onreport,
sintegrity
tructesting Prepare
tincluding
iotesting
nM odrawings,
nforiortoyour
ringproject. (if required), a pile Reaction design frame Load cells
Earthquake jacks
Resistant
Load cells and Foundation
jacks Design.with depth from Example LPile. pile bending moment
• Pile
• Consider • Pileintegrity
load
pile testing can belowused
pile integrity
to: testing (PIT) technical specification, general FigureLoad
6.2,Section
cells and6.2, page 49.
jacks
••Pile
Consider
load
Cross
pile
testing
•
hole •load
load
Pilesonic
and/or
and/or
Consider
can be
integrity used
logging
pile
pile
pile are
testing
integrity
to:integrity
load and/or
used
(e.g. to
low
testing
pile
notes
assess
strain
for
foryour
integrity
andpile
the
project.
yourtesting
pile
project.for your project.
integrity
integrity schedule.
testing of the
(PIT) or
actions with depth from LPile.
••-Pile integrity •
- Assess the
Consider
testing
load-settlement
pile
(e.g. load
low
response
and/or
strain pile
integrity
of the tested
integrity
testing testing
(PIT)
on
or
site
for under
your project.
Pilepile
integrity
Assess the
shaft).
specific •testing
load-settlement
Cross (e.g.
Pile conditions.
load integrity
hole lowtesting
response
sonic strainof
logging integrity
the
(e.g. tested
arelow used testing
pile
strain on (PIT) the
site
integrity
to assess ortesting
under integrity(PIT)of or
the Reaction frame
Cross
Cross hole
specifichole sonic
• Pile
sonic S
logging
logging
integrity t e p
are5
are
testing :
used
usedT e s t
to
(e.g. P i l e
assess
tolowassess s a
strainn
thed
the C o n
integrity s
integrity
integrity tr u c
of t i o
the
of the
testing n M
the(PIT) o n ororof
i t ingthe
STEP 5 : Test Piles and Construction Monitoring
load conditions.
pile Cross
shaft). hole sonic logging are used to assess integrity
pile• Pile
shaft).load
- Increase testing
the can be
geotechnical used to:
strength reduction
S tepto factor
5the: Tpile in the pile
estdesign design
Pileintegrity
s and Cofonthe struction Monitoring
Load cells and jacks
Reaction frame
- pile shaft).
Increase theCross pilehole
geotechnical sonic
shaft).strengthloggingreductionare usedfactor in assess the
- Assess •pile
(AS2159)thePile the•testing
load Consider
load-settlement
as pile can pile
response
resistance load
beand used and/or
to:
ofload-settlement
the tested pilepileintegrity
on site testing
behaviour under for your project.
will be Load cells and jacks
• Consider •pile
•Pile load testing shaft).
can be used to:
(AS2159)
Pile load
load
specific
as
and/or
measured -•Assess
the
testing
load
pile
Pilecanresistance
• be
pile
load
the
conditions.
on site. used and
integrity
testing
load-settlement
Pile integrity
load-settlement
to:can testing
be •
used
response
testing (e.g.
behaviour
for
to:low
Consider of the your
tested
pile
strain
will
load
be
project.
pile
integrity ontesting
and/or site under
pile integrity
(PIT) or testing for your project.
- -measured
• Pile integrity
Assess
Assess
testing
the •onload-settlement
the Pile
site.
(e.g.-load
load-settlement
low
Assess testing
the
response
strain
Cross can
holebe
response ofofused
the
integrity
load-settlement
sonic
tested
to:
thelogging
tested pile
pile
testing
response are
on
ofon site
the
used site under
(PIT) under
tested
to assess orthe
pile Cross
on site hole
under
integrity sonic logging are
of the
- Assess
- Increase
specific
- Assess load
pile
thespecific
pile
conditions.
- Assess
design
load
design
geotechnical conditions.
parameters
strength
the load-settlement
parameters
(upfront
(upfront
reduction
response
testing
• on
testing
factor on sacrificial
in the
of the tested
sacrificial
pile piles)
design or
Pile integrity testing (e.g. low strain integrity testing (PIT) or
piles) pile
or on site under
specific load -conditions.
specific pile
load shaft).
conditions. Test pile
used to assess- -verify the
(AS2159)
Increase integrity
verify theas pile of
the performance
Increase pilethe the
resistance pile
geotechnical onand shaft).
working
strength piles
Cross
load-settlement (verification
holebehaviour
reduction sonic testing).
factor logging
inwill
thebe are design
pile used to assess the integrity of the
Test pile
the the
Increase pile
the geotechnical
specific
performance
geotechnical strength
load conditions.
on working
strength reduction factor
piles (verification
reduction factor ininthe pile
piledesign
testing).
the design
• Pile load testing • Construction
measured
can be on- Increase
(AS2159)
site.
used • Pile
as the
to:
monitoring the geotechnical
loadpile testing
resistance can
is load-settlement
important
pile
strength
be
and shaft).
used reduction
to:
load-settlement factor in the pilewill
behaviour design
be
(AS2159)
(AS2159)as as the
- Increase
the pile
pileresistance
the- geotechnical
resistance and
theand strength to
load-settlement
verify
reduction behaviourthat
behaviourfactor pile
will be
in tested
will the pile
bebehaviourdesign
– Assess •the •the
Construction (AS2159)
monitoring isassite.
Assess pile
the
important resistance
load-settlement and load-settlement
response of the pile on willunder
to:site be
- Assess
measured
pile
construction
load-settlement
on
measured
design
site. was on
parameters
carried
response out into
(upfront verify
accordance
of Pile
testing that
load
on
tested pile
testing
sacrificial
with the
pile can
piles)
design
on beorsite
used under specific
measured
construction on(AS2159)
site. as specific
the onpile resistance and load-settlement behaviour will be
intent
verify thewas-and
Assess
pile carried
measured
for pile out
verification
performance design in accordance
onload
site. of conditions.
foundation
parameters
working piles with
- Assess
(upfrontlayersthethedesign
testing
(verification load-settlement
(e.g. onrock socket
sacrificial
testing). response
piles) orof the tested pile on site under Test pile
load conditions.
-intent
Assess
- Assess pile
and
material
design
pilefor measured
-and
parameters
verification
design Assess on
parameters site.
-pile of
Increase
locations).
(upfront
foundation
design(upfront
the testing layers
testing
geotechnical
parameters
onon sacrificial
(e.g.
sacrificial
strength
(upfront
specific rock piles)
testing
load socket
piles)
reduction on
or
conditions.orfactor in the
sacrificial pile or
piles) design Test pile 4 No. reaction piles
verify the pile performance on working piles (verification testing).
– Increase the • Construction
verify
material geotechnical
verify the pile
theandpile monitoring
performance
locations).
- Assess strength
pilethe
performance
verify designon
(AS2159)
pile
is
onworking important
as reduction
parameters
working
performance
piles
the to
pile(upfront
piles verify
(verification
resistance
(verification
on - working
Increase
that
factor
testing
and onpile
testing).
testing).
the
piles in the pile
sacrificial
load-settlement
geotechnical
(verification piles)design
strength orreduction
behaviour
testing). (AS2159)
will befactor in the asdesign
pile the Test
Testpile
pile 4 No. reaction piles
Test pile
construction • verify was
Construction carried out on
monitoring in site.
accordance
isworking
important with the design
to(verification Example of static load test arrangement. Test pile Example of soil/rock samples inspected from bored pile construction.
pile resistance
••Construction and load-settlement
the pile measured
performance behaviour
on piles
(AS2159) will asverify
be
the pile that
measured pile andon
testing).
resistance site. of behaviour
Example
load-settlement static load willtest
be arrangement.
Construction •monitoring
monitoring
intent andconstruction
for verification
Construction -
isisimportant
was
Assess
important
of foundation
monitoring
carried
pile design
toto
out
verify
isverify that
layers
important
in
parameters
that
accordance
pile
pile
(e.g.to rock
(upfront withsocket
verify
testing that
the
on pile
design
sacrificial piles) or
Example of soil/rock samples inspected from bored pile construction.
– Assess pile design
construction
construction
material parameters
was
• Construction
andwas
intent
carried
carried
locations).
construction
and for
out
out (upfront
monitoringininaccordance
was accordance
carried
verification oftesting
is important
out with
measured
with
in
foundation on
the
the
to
accordance sacrificial
design
on site.
design
verify
layers that
with
(e.g.pile
the
rockpiles)
design
socket or verify the pile Test pile
4 No. reaction piles
intent and for verification verify
of the pile performance
foundation on working piles (verification testing).testing on sacrificial piles) or
performance intenton andworking
for intent piles
verification
construction
material andwas of(verification
for foundation
carried
verification
locations). outlayersin - Assess
layers (e.g.
testing).
ofaccordance (e.g.
foundation
pilerockdesign
rock socket
with parameters
socket
layers the design
(e.g.
(upfront
rock socket Example of static load test arrangement. 44No.
4 No. reaction piles
material and locations). No.reaction
reactionpiles
piles
Test pilereaction piles
4 No. Example of soil/rock samples inspected from bored pile construction.
material
• Construction monitoring and intentlocations).
and
material • for verification
Construction
and locations).
is important of
monitoring verify
foundation is the pile
layers
important performance
to verify that pile construction was carried (e.g.
to rock
verify onsocket
thatworking
pile piles (verification testing).
out of static load test arrangement.
construction Example 4 No. reaction piles Example of soil/rock samples inspected from bored pile construction.
material and locations).was carried out
• Construction in accordance with the design Example of static load test arrangement. Example
in accordance with the design intent intent and for and for
verification verification
of foundation
monitoring is importantExample
of foundation
layers (e.g.inrock
to verify that
layersof(e.g.
socket
pile
static load test
rock
Example arrangement.
of static load test arrangement. Exampleof
ofsoil/rock
soil/rocksamples
Examplesamples inspected
inspected
of soil/rock from bored
boredpile
frominspected
samples construction.
pilefrom
construction.
bored pile construction.
construction was carried out accordance withExample
the designof static load test arrangement. 4 No. reaction piles
socket material and locations). material and locations). Example of soil/rock samples inspected from bored pile construction.
intent and for verification of foundation layers (e.g. rock socket
4 No. reaction piles
material and locations). Example of static load test arrangement. Example of soil/rock samples inspected from bored pile construction.
ABOVE Example of soil/rock samples
Example
ABOVE of static load
Example oftest arrangement.
static load test arrangement. Example
collected fromofbored
soil/rock samples
pile inspected from bored pile cons
construction.

DISCLAIMER: This reference guide is not a standard. It is a ‘rough guide’ based on common practice in New Zealand. The recommended calculation process/analytical methods within this document are not intended to be codified
nor does the document hold any legal requirement/standing in New Zealand. The accuracy of the process described below depends highly on the expertise of the geoprofessional regarding the modelling of the design, the
understanding of various soil models and their limitations, the selection of material parameters, and the ability to judge the results. NOTE: Bold, underlined text contain hyperlinks to external sources. These hyperlinks are subject
to failure should these posters be reviewed in print form.