Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 9 - Gethics Short Term 2022-2023
Module 9 - Gethics Short Term 2022-2023
Ethical Framework:
Thomas Aquinas’ Natural Law
Module 9 tackles the moral philosophy of one of the greatest philosopher-theologican in the
middle ages, Saint Thomas Aquinas. In this module, we will trace the influence of Aristotle in
St. Thomas’ philosophy and point out what is “new” in it. As you come to understand Saint
Thomas’ concepts on morality and his method in knowing what is good, it is hoped that you
will come to appreciate him as the one who taught us that divine union with God is not
simply a matter of faith, but also a matter of using the gift of reason.
Learning Outcomes:
At the end of Module 9, you should be able to:
1. trace the connections between the Eternal Law and Natural Law;
2. compare and contrast Aristotle and Saint Thomas’ concept of happiness and
goodness;
3. differentiate the cardinal virtues from the theological virtues; and
4. argue for the possibility or impossibility of “synderesis.”
ENGAGE
SCENARIO: You know that you are failing in one of your subjects. Is it better to cheat during
exam than to fail in that subject?
Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited. 1
EXPLORE
Access and watch the following short videos for additional knowledge on Saint Thomas’
moral philosophy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJvoFf2wCBU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpVfd6oCF5M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_UfYY7aWKo
EXPLAIN
Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited. 2
Mover, First Cause, Perfect Good, Final Cause and Good of all Things. St. Thomas Aquinas
upheld these arguments as valid and true, and in fact adopted these proofs in his Quinque
Viae (Five Ways) to prove God’s existence. Yet, he saw their limitations: they do not reveal
the nature of God as we know Him from the Bible and Christian Teaching – as a Personal
God, our loving Father, Redeemer and Benefactor to whom we pray. The same limitation in
knowledge is obtained in Aristotle’s philosophy of man, particularly on the ultimate destiny
of man. For instance, while there are hints of the immortality of the soul of man in his writings,
Aristotle never proved the immortality of the soul as this lies beyond the comprehension of
human reason.
Man has the natural inclination to be happy, but more than Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas
proposes that man seeks ultimate happiness in God, the Greatest Good (Summum Bonum).
Thus, faith and reason go together in seeking the truth of God. We can come to know God
through our conscience, through the “voice of God” in us. Obedience to Natural Law is
rational participation in the Eternal Law of God. Humans follow their conscience in caring for
themselves and for their fellow humans.
Here is a partial list of the virtues that a person can live for (Rachels, 176):
These character traits foster the development of a human person, fitting for the person
to have. It is always believed that virtues cannot be bought by any means because they are
carried through life, they cannot be bought by money but they can be taught to children,
and through constant practice, they can be learned and developed overtime. They are
inherent in a person. It is noticeable that a person is good by his actions, words, and ways of
doing things, and relating to people.
For St. Thomas Aquinas, we need to follow the law which is “a rule or body of rules that
tells individuals what they may and may not do.” Nevertheless, man has the gift of reason
and freedom to obey that which is good and just. The law is legislated by those given
authority for the sake of the common good; thus, the law is a human positive law because
it is crafted by the human mind. The human positive law is derived from the natural law,
which is a “pattern of necessary and universal regularity and universal moral imperatives, a
description of what ought to happen in all human relationships.”. Now, the natural law, in
turn, is reflective of the eternal law, which, according to St. Thomas Aquinas, “is God’s
decree for the governance of the universe.”
As human beings, it is not our nature to go against what nature provides. We do not
need to go against it; and we can be satisfied with what it provides us. This is because “the
natural law, in its universal character, can in no way be blotted out from men’s hearts.”
Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited. 3
Epictetus has said it, “Do not seek the good in external things; seek the good in yourselves: if
you do not, you will not find it.”
For Thomas Aquinas, the natural law is the order of nature. Like Aristotle, he taught
that the purpose of human life is happiness and that the goodness or badness of an action
would depend on this relation to that purpose. To follow human nature, i.e., to be rational,
means that the person should use his/her conscience to do good and to avoid evil. It is thus
in the nature of the person to understand so he or she can believe. (In the medieval times of
philosophy, notable philosophical figures teach/believe one of, or both of these two notions,
which might as well be understood as complementaries of each other: credo ut intellegam
and intelligo ut credam. The first translates as “I believe so that I may understand, while the
second states “I understand so that I may believe”. In these notions, one can find the blend
and intertwining of theology and philosophy).
ELABORATE
“Can I still be good or capable of doing what is good even if I do not believe in God?”
Assuming you were Saint Thomas, what would your answer be? Elaborate.
EVALUATE
For the evaluative part of the module, Please refer to the Google Form uploaded to the
Google classroom. Please answer the Google form quiz diligently. Do your Best!
Property of and for the exclusive use of SLU. Reproduction, storing in a retrieval system, distributing, uploading or posting online, or transmitting in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise of any part of this document, without the prior written permission of SLU, is strictly prohibited. 4