Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jaishri Jethwaney, Corporate Communication, SAGE Publications Pvt.
Jaishri Jethwaney, Corporate Communication, SAGE Publications Pvt.
Jaishri Jethwaney, Corporate Communication, SAGE Publications Pvt.
COMMUNICATION
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
JAISHRI JETHWANEY
Professor
Indian Institute of Mass Communication
New Delhi
1
© Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
3
YMCA Library Building, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi 110001
With offices in
Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Published in India
by Oxford University Press
You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-806365-0
ISBN-10: 0-19-806365-2
Typeset in Baskerville
by System Graphics, New Delhi 110028
Printed in India by Tara Art Printers (P) Ltd, Noida
and published by Oxford University Press
YMCA Library Building, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi 110001
CORPORATE
Contents
Preface iii
4. Employee Communication 99
Introduction 99
Employee Communication 100
Genesis of Employee Communication 102
Corporate Communication and Its Interface with Other Management Functions 102
Outsourcing Internal Communication 104
Theoretical Underpinnings in Employee Communication 105
Theories That Impact Employee Communication 106
Segmenting Internal Publics 108
The Content of Communication to Employees 109
Various Media for Internal Communication 110
Bulletin Boards 116
Best Employer Survey 119
Case Studies I: The GE Turn Around 122
Case Studies II: Colgate-Palmolive Setting a Common Goal for Employees 124
Index 430
INTRODUCTION
It is almost four decades since the nomenclature corporate communication surfaced,
especially in the West. However, many professionals and managements are still very
vague about its actual role and scope, especially in India. Some feel it is
Various opinions regard- simply good old PR camouflaged as corporate communication; others
ing public relations and
corporate communication
feel that PR is but a tiny part of the overall corporate communication;
have been discussed. and yet others feel that corporate communication is a part of marketing
communication. Argenti and Forman argue that ‘corporate communication
can claim historical links to the field of public relations, which has been concerned with
the voice and image of big business for nearly a century.’1 Harold Burson, Founder
Chairman, Burson–Marsteller writes, ‘Corporate communications is one of the many
sub-sets of public relations and under that umbrella you can have relations with advisory
services, investor relations, internal communications, marketing support, litigation
support, etc.’2
Cutlip et al. write that among the Fortune 500 companies, only one in five uses the
‘public relations’ title. Other commonly used titles are corporate communication, public
affairs, public information, or PR in combination with advertising.3
Interestingly, however, corporate communication as a subject is being pulled out from
some journalism schools to management schools.4
Corporate communication, a predecessor of PR, observes Argenti, grew out of
necessity. He feels that as the various new laws forced the companies to communicate
in situations, which they were not used to, meant that they had to create ‘dedicated
resources’ to manage the flow of communications.5
Dolphin, arguing on the basis of academic literature posits that PR and communication
have been used interchangeably for long. Similarly, he writes, that the emphasis placed on
certain nomenclatures vary according to the country of origin. What used to trade under
the name of PR is now variously known as ‘corporate affairs, corporate communication,
or public affairs’.6
Lee’s actions annoyed labour supporters who saw him as being anti-union and
committed to breaking the strike.12
Hallhan however feels that Lee was not ‘intentionally deceptive’, but at the same time
he contradicted his own thesis, which suggests that a gap existed between his espoused
principles of publicity and his actions.13
Given below is the picture of armoured car, known as the ‘Death Car’ (Fig. 1.1), for
harassing mining strikers in Ludlow, Colorado. A memorial was built in the memory
of 20 people, including 11 children, who died a violent death on 20 April 1914, during
a day-long fight between the strikers and the Colorado National Guard. The granite
monument was built by the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA), which had
organized the strike against the coal mine companies in Colorado. The three large
companies included the Rockefeller family-owned company called the Colorado
Fuel & Iron Company (DF&I), the Rocky Mountain Fuel Company (RMF), and the
Victor-American Fuel Company (VAF). The massacre site in Colorado is owned by the
UMWA, which has built the monument. The site of Massacre was recently designated
as the National Historic Landmark on 16 January 2009 and dedicated on 28 June 2009
(Fig. 1.2).14
Around the same time, the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T)
felt the need for such a department and even used the term public relations for the first
time in its annual report.15
Lee’s contemporary Edward Bernays practised PR for almost 80 years of his life
spanning over 100 years (1892–1995). Argenti et al. believe that several of Bernays’ high
profile assignments point to his contributions to corporate communication as practised
today: the Ivory soap campaign for Procter & Gamble, the Torches of Freedom March
for the American Tobacco Company, and Light’s golden jubilee for General Electric are
definite pointers in this direction.16
Let us look at two of his campaigns in a nutshell to draw the connections.
must represent the public to his client and vice versa. He must understand how public
opinion is formed and maintained, and must understand social psychology, in particular,
stereotypes, that in his view were the mental phenomena used by the people in the
formation of public opinion. He believed that when a PR counsellor created news, he
strengthened, weakened, or aimed at amending the stereotypes.
Ivy Lee also echoed that publicity was essentially a matter of ‘mass psychology’ and
people were guided ‘more by sentiment than mind’, a premise often used in corporate
and brand campaigns even today.
In 1922, when Lee addressed a young group of students at the Columbia School of
Journalism, he exhorted them thus: ‘You must study human emotions and all the factors
that move people that persuade men in any line of human activity. Mob psychology is
one of the most important factors that underlay this whole business.’22
It is not difficult to link the connection of this thesis with today’s practice of advertising,
PR, and corporate communication.
tively impacted the reputation of PR. John Creel, a former journalist, had headed the
US propaganda efforts during World War I, using all aspects of media including film,
posters, music, painting, and cartoons to ensure public backing of the government’s
decision to enter the war. After the war, many Americans felt that US involvement was
unnecessary. Prior to World War II, Ivy Lee, a journalist turned publicity agent, served
as advisor to a German cartel by the name of German Dye Trust that supported Adolf
Hitler’s restriction on religion and freedom of press. Because of his friendly relations
with Hitler prior to his rise to power in 1933, Lee was often branded as a traitor and was
called ‘Poison Lee’ by his critics. Similarly, when the Watergate scandal was unearthed,
Richard Nixon referred to the cover up tactics as a ‘PR situation’. Critics believe that
wittingly or unwittingly the Watergate episode damaged the reputation of the PR profes-
sion, despite the fact that what Nixon and his cronies did was opposite of PR.
Unfortunately, Nixon reaffirmed the public view when he used the term ‘a PR situa-
tion’ while talking about the cover up tactics.
It is believed that many PR practitioners got wary of the nomenclature as aspersions
were cast on the profession per se. Gradually, PR metamorphosed into corporate com-
munication, albeit with an expanded mandate to cover many other facets that PR
traditionally did not handle, such as corporate brand management, corporate social
responsibility, care management, etc.
other things. The media treated the entire public sector as a monolith, despite the fact
that there were some public sector organizations that could truly be treated as ‘blue
chip’.
Concerned about the increasing poor performance of many PSUs and their poorer
image, Mrs Indira Gandhi, under the aegis of the Standing Conference of Public Sector
Enterprises (SCOPE), an association of the PSUs, convened a conference of the CEOs
of PSUs in the late 1970s to review the issue. In a path-breaking decision, which kind
of laid the foundation for PR, all central PSUs were asked to have a PR department
headed by a professional. Convinced that a motivated force was imperative for the
success of an organization, a decision was also taken whereby all PSUs were advised to
motivate the workforce and inform them about the company through employee com-
munication media, especially the house journal. Later, when she imposed the infamous
‘Emergency’ in 1975, all the PSU boards were asked to introduce ‘workers’ participation’
in governance, another path-breaking decision in corporate governance covering the
internal stakeholders.
The private sector on the other hand practised PR, which often meant protocol and
media relations.
the public and private sectors, have designated their PR departments as corporate com-
munication departments and PR managers as corporate communication managers.
Professional bodies, however, continue to be referred to as PR societies or asso-
ciations.
other things; for investor relations, it can help to produce appropriate literature
and organize events; for HR, it can render help in media interface in times of
employee unrest; and for the production team, it can help to devise staff motivation
programmes by using various communication channels. In other words, corporate
communication serves as a link between the internal and the external universe of the
organization.
Recent research on the corporate communication functions reveals that nearly half
(48%) the corporate communication officers (CCOs) in the global Fortune 500 companies
report to the chief executive officer. Approximately 42 per cent of the CCOs’ job is
strategic and 58 per cent is tactical. Over the next years, they will focus more on social
responsibility, social media, and reputation. The research done by Weber Shandwick
and Spencer Stuart found distinct differences in the perceptions of CCOs from the most
admired companies vs contender companies.26
experience with its brands, people, or services. Sometimes the perceptions are shaped by
external stimuli provided by media or events. Communication during normal and critical
times is the responsibility of the corporate communication department. However, before
messages are crafted it is important to know the minds of the target audience. Each
message that reaches out to a stakeholder group must satisfy its need for information and
fulfil the organization’s responsibility towards that group.
Research and evaluation need to be in-built in every corporate communication pr-
ogramme. It is imperative that the corporate communication department or consultancy
must constantly evaluate performance in areas, such as ensuring media mileage, de-
livery of key messages, market research and surveys, tracking customer/reader inquiries,
tracking media opinion, event success, and brand audit.
January 2009, watched by more than 1.3 billion people around the world said, ‘Without
a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control. A nation cannot prosper long when
it favours only the prosperous.’27
The famous economist Micheal Shermer’s article ‘Why People don’t Trust Free
Market’, which drew huge responses on his blog, provides interesting insights about
people’s disdain towards big business. To quote Shermer,
Capitalism may not need apologists and propagandists, but it does need a vigorous scientific
and rational defence as evidenced by the fact that so many people still distrust free markets.
Market solutions to social problems are generally received with scepticism. Businessmen are
distrusted, corporations looked at askance, and there is a well-known resentment against
those who have most benefited from markets. (As one New Yorker cartoon featuring two
people in conversation reads: ‘I hated Bill Gates before it became so fashionable’).28
Why do people distrust free markets? Part of the answer, argues Shermer, can be
found in history. For a long time people lived in small groups and communes comprising
a few, to a few hundred people, where each one knew the other intimately. In most
cases they were genetically related. Most of the resources were shared and wealth was
not accumulated. Excessive greed on the part of someone in the group was abhorred
and the guilty punished. Therefore, people naturally respond to a free market system
in which conspicuous wealth is paraded as a sign of success with envy and anger. He
calls the phenomenon ‘evolutionary egalitarianism’. Throughout most of the history of
civilization, economic inequalities were not necessarily the result of natural differences
in drive and talent among members of a society equally free to pursue their right to
prosperity. Instead, it was ‘a handful of chiefs, kings, nobles, and priests who exploited
an unfair and rigged social system to achieve gains best described as ill-gotten’.29
As more and more people are exposed to the way business functions, especially when
scams and fraudulent practices by big business houses such as Enron, WorldCom,
Texwel, P. Anderson, and Satyam Computers surface, business in general is seen as
suspect. Public opinion against business builds up instantly when people’s hard-earned
money disappears in the stock market tumble because someone already so rich wished
to make more money at the cost of teaming millions by fudging figures and befooling the
system! As a fall out, issues relating to corporate governance are debated and discussed at
various levels. In fact, soon after Satyam’s fraud became public, rival Infosys’ spokesper-
sons highlighted the corporate governance imperatives in their company to anyone who
was listening.
respond to the information needs of media quickly and honestly. This would be possible
when the top management understands the role of corporate communication and trusts
the person or agency in charge of this.
Most corporate communication is achieved through media. Therefore, it is impor-
tant for the person in charge of corporate communication to fully understand the
media environment, its sociology, functioning, dynamics, and undercurrents. The
next chapter on media dynamics and strategies is devoted to this aspect of corporate
communication.
SUMMARY
In this chapter we looked at the roots of corporate communication, tracking a century old relationship with PR. We looked
at various definitions of corporate communication and discussed the various reasons that have contributed to the poor
perception of business among the general public. The chapter then discussed the importance of understanding the
trinity of communication, namely message, medium, and audience, before undertaking any programme. The functions
of corporate communication and its role in a convergent world were touched upon. Finally, we discussed why there is a
growing need for the corporate communication function among organizations and what it takes to become a successful
corporate communication practitioner.
KEY TERMS
Communication channels Various media, such as institutions, and individual investors.
mass media, newspapers, television, radio, Internet, Key trade press Financial newspapers, magazines,
cinema, and interpersonal media through which and trade news channels and financial journalists.
communication is done. Marketing communication Those forms of
Corporate communication How a company commu- communication that support sales of particular goods
nicates with its various stakeholders, both in routine or services, including advertising, sales promotion,
and crisis times. direct mail communication, etc.
Corporate governance How a company runs its Management communication It encompasses
business, both legally and ethically. communication used in the various staff and line
Corporate social responsibility The responsibility of functions in an organization.
a corporate organization towards society, which goes Organizational communication Communication
beyond the obvious. that encompasses cover PR, public affairs, investor
Corporate image How a company is perceived by the relations, labour market communication, corporate
outside world. advertising, environmental communication, corporate
Crisis communication How a company communi- communication, etc.
cates in times of crisis to reach out to various stake- Public relations A deliberate, planned, and sustained
holders through various means, including the media, effort to create mutual understanding between an
with a view to informing them on how it is handling organization and its different publics.
the crisis. Stakeholders The people and groups of people on
Investor relationship Relationship of a company whom the sustenance of an organization rests.
with its various investors, including banks, financial
PROJECT WORK
Meet at least four corporate communication practitioners from the corporate sector and PR/corporate
communication consultancies, and discuss when and how corporate communication came to be
practised in your country. Discuss whether there has been an expansion of works after the department
was designated as corporate communication, or if it is the same as before. Make a list of functions used
by practitioners, both in PR as well as corporate communication.
NOTES
1. Argenti, Paul A. and Janis Forman 2002, The Power of Corporate Communication, McGraw-Hill, NY,
pp. 17–18.
2. http://www.exchange4media.com/PR/Pr_speak.asp?PR_id=69.
3. Cutlip, Scott M., Allen H. Xenter, and Glen M. Broom 2006, Effective Public Relations, 8th edition, Pearson
Education, New Delhi, pp. 72–73.
4. Ibid.
5. Argenti, Paul A. 2007, Strategic Corporate Communication, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, pp. 44–45.
6. Dolphin, Richard R. 1999, The Fundamentals of Corporate Communication, Butterworth–Heinemann,
London, p. 3.
7. Jackson, P. 1987, Corporate Communication for Managers, Pitman London.
8. Fernandez, Joseph 2004, Corporate Communication—A 21st Century Primer, Response Books, New Delhi, pp.
55–56.
9. Dolphin, Richard R. 1999, The Fundamentals of Corporate Communication, Butterworth–Heinemann,
London, p. 1.
10. Finley, J.R. 1994, ‘The Task and Responsibilities of Business Affairs’, Business Quarterly, 58, p.105, as
quoted by R.R. Dolphin.
11. The incident happened in 1914, but has come alive after almost a century with film footage of the incident
and media coverage, and the names of those who lost their lives, the memorial in their remembrance,
and documents relating to the incident on the Net. For more details log on to wikipedia.org or simply
write ‘Ludlow Massacre’ on Google search.
12. www. nku.edu/turney/micheal12.htm.
13. Hallahan, Krik 2002, Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 14, issue 4, January, pp. 265–315.
14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Historic_Landmark.
15. Ibid.
16. Argenti Paul A. and Janis Forman 2002, The Power of Corporate Communication, McGraw-Hill, NY, pp.
26–28.
17. Tye, Larry 1998, The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and the Birth of Public Relations, Crown Publishers,
New York, p. 157.
18. Argenti, Paul A. and Janis Forman 2002, The Power of Corporate Communication, McGraw-Hill, NY, p. 26.
19. Quoted in Bernays, Biography of an Idea, p. 387, reproduced by Argenti, Paul A. and Janis Forman, ibid.,
p. 27.
20. Tye, Larry 1998, The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and the Birth of Public Relations, Crown Publishers,
New York, p. 157.
21. Kevin Moloney, Rethinking PR, 2000 (New York: Routledge) pp. 68–72.
22. Ibid.
23. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/onpolitics/watergate/chronology.htm.
24. Former Prime Minister, late Narasimha Rao, while inaugurating the 15th All India Public Relations
Conference on 9 November 1993, in New Delhi.
25. http://india_resource.tripod.com/liber.html.
26. Argenti, Paul A. and Janis Forman 2002, The Power of Corporate Communication, McGraw-Hill, NY, pp.
5–6.
27. Quoted from live coverage on CNN, 20 January 2009.
28. http://www.michaelshermer.cm/2008/01/why-people-dont-trust-free-markets/.
29. Ibid.
30. http://onlybombay.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html.
31. http://elitechoice.org/2008/12/23/who-loves-his-wife-the-most-if-only-money-could-tell/.
32. http://www.ndtv.com/converagence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080048618.