Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scorecard: Who's Who's
Scorecard: Who's Who's
Scorecard: Who's Who's
BY M A NISH A DHIK A RY
avjot Singh Sidhus metamorphosis from an influential batsman into a purveyor of streetwise wit on the small screen has been as mercurial as the sixes he hit off Shane Warne. He has, post-retirement, also scaled great heights in politics, winning the general election from Amritsar three times in a row and becoming one of the Bharatiya Janata Partys star election campaigners. Then there is his positively hilariousand commercially fulfillingstint as a judge on the Great Indian Laughter Challenge. His immense popularity on the small screen meant he was an obvious choice for ESPN STAR Sports as a co-presenter of the pre- and post-match shows during the cricket World Cup. But every silver lining comes with a cloud. In Sherrys case, on Cricket Extra, the cloud wafted out of his mouth. The uber enthusiastic gent from Patiala cut the hapless Harsha Bhogle short more times than he had any bowler during his days as an opening batsman. He sliced Ian Chappells observations dead
with garbled clichs. Tony Greig chafed at asides that were nothing short of insults and smiled before resigning in the face of the attention-seekers tirade of one-liners. Sourav Ganguly put up a poker face. Pat Symcox ducked out of the line as Sherry went about trying to win the Cup for India with his one-linerssinglehandedly. Some TV viewers watched all of this. Most of them, like the anti-Hosni Mubarak Egyptians, took the obvious recourse. They logged on to Twitter. About the man who had once famously said, Deep Dasgupta [former India wicketkeeper] is as confused as a
around, tweeted vadapoche on the man who had described one of Sachin Tendulkars back-foot cover drives played standing on his toes by saying, He played that shot like a dwarf in the urinal. The rocks were clearly aimed at the rock star himself. But, unlike in the case of a cocaine-driven icon rambling about world peace, it is difficult to pinpoint Sidhus first snort of the ungraceful. It wasnt so much what he said during the World Cup that hurt but the way he said it. Overtly conscious of the camera, unwilling to share on-air time with fellow experts, eagerness to interject, a
come ahead of the in-form Yuvraj Singh in the batting order in the final: Any jackass can take down a door, but it takes a carpenter to build a great one. Sidhu has built more doors than most men who are not carpenters. But in the business of expressing his views he seems to be jumping out of windows. Why, most of us wonder. Especially when you know for a fact that ungentlemanly is the last thing Sidhu is outside the small screen. He is supposed to be a really nice, educated man. Delhi University professor and cricket enthusiast Debraj Mookerjee feels
Benaud is the cricket sage, Lawry the Victorian chauvinist and Sidhu a LICENSED COURT JESTER.
child is in a topless bar, a certain chondhe tweeted: Navjot Sidhu is like a penny stock in a bull market. His value (money he gets) keeps rising tho u cant justify it with any fundamentals. Somebody pls tell Navjot Sidhu that Jesus Christ is not a phrase that any idiot tosses propensity to trivialise and the tendency to laugh down argumentsthe list of accusations is long. His verbal calisthenics did not hit home. As is the case with a batsman trying to play a forced shot, the ball did not find the middle. Not even when he metaphorised Dhonis decision to Sidhus evolution may have to do with the degeneration of the game itself. Weve reduced the game of cricket to a tamasha. The entire spectacle is hyperbolic. Its tough to find Sidhu analysing the game in cricketing terms, he says. He ratchets up the pitch to make his comments parse with the madIL LUS T R AT I O N: V I V EK B H A RDWA J
ness that best describes the game in our country today. He is quite obviously playing to the gallery. Historian and novelist Mukul Kesavan alludes to the image that Sidhu has created over the years. Its important to realise that he is not a buffoon who accidentally became a commentator. A Test cricketer, Member of Parliament, reality show star, commentator Sidhu is a remarkably successful person, he says. Like most popular commentators, he has consciously created a persona which allows him to say things others would not dare to. So how do you describe the Sidhu of today? In fairly simple terms, says Kesavan, Richie Benaud is the cricketing sage; Bill Lawry was the Victorian chauvinist; Ian Chappell is the straight-talking Aussie; Bhogle is like a maitre dhotel; and Sidhu... Sidhu is a licensed court jester. Cracking jokes never hurt anyone but when a jesters image begins to invite a shrug of the shoulders, you know its not the rib-tickler which is at fault. Brand consultant Suhel Seth is one of those people who cannot stand Sidhu the commentator. His Sidhuisms have turned into Sillyisms, he says, referring to the moniker accorded to the commentators memorable one-liners. He has taken cricket commentary to a despicable level. He used to be funny and relevant once. But now he is not only disruptive, its also tough to get a word of information out of him. Seths argument may well lie at the heart of Sidhus lack of selfrestraint on TVthe fact that, by concentrating on living up to his loose cannon persona, he is failing as a commentator. And, perhaps for the first time, it is a commentator at the receiving end of unfulfilled expectation and not a player. Navjot Sidhu used to be a fine commentator and we know he means well. But, to use one of the lines coined by Sidhu himself, you may have a heart of gold, but so does a hardboiled egg.
14 | S P O R T S I L L U S T R AT E D | M AY 2011
M AY 2011 | S P O R T S I L L U S T R AT E D | 15
scorecard_2nd_time.indd 18-19
30/04/11 3:02 PM