Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Methods of Monitoring & Evaluation
Methods of Monitoring & Evaluation
Evaluation
(September 11 – 14, 2018)
By
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3
The Planning Commission (denoted as PC) is a financial and public policy development institution
of the Government of Pakistan. The Commission comes under Ministry of Planning, Development
and Reforms. The Planning Commission undertakes research studies and state policy
development initiatives for the growth of national economy and the expansion of the public and
state infrastructure of the country in tandem with the Ministry of Finance (MoF). Since 1952, the
commission have had a major influence and role in formulating the highly centralized and planned
five-year plans for the national economy, for most of the 20th century in Pakistan. Although the
five-year plans were replaced by Medium Term Development Framework, the commission still
played an influential and central role in the development of the programme. Furthermore, the
Public Sector Development Programmes (PSDP) is also placed under the domain of the planning
commission.
The commission is headed by the Prime Minister who serves as the commission’s Chairman,
assisted by the deputy chairman. Additionally, an Advisory Committee comprising of advisors
from different sectors also assists the commission in its working. The hierarchy further descends
to a group of members namely Member Coordination who is Secretary PDR, Member Economic
Policy / Planning, Member Infrastructure & Regional Connectivity, Member Implementation &
Monitoring, Member Science & Technology, Member Social Sector & Devolution, Member
Governance, Innovation & Reforms, Member Food Security & Climate Change and Member
Research. Each Member is assisted by Director Generals who have Directors working under their
subordination.
The mission of PC is to manage Pakistan’s socio-economic development in a strategic and
sustainable manner. To achieve this mission, PC has devised a three pronged strategy which
includes provision of leadership in carrying out economic and development programs,
coordination of efforts with public agencies, private partners and other stakeholders and lastly but
most importantly enabling and capacity enhancement of public entities in the field of planning and
implementation.
3
policy formulation, methodology for program and project planning, implementation and monitoring
of programs, projects and plans as well as their Impact assessments, evaluations and outcomes.
PPMI held its final training session for the first quarter of 2018 year on the topic of “Methods of
Monitoring & Evaluation” on September 11, 2018. The course continued for a duration of four
days and was attended by an audience of officials belonging from both the government sector
and its subsidiary agencies. All of the participants attending the training course ranged from a
variety of public sector spectrum i.e. education, infrastructure, defense and social sector, however
they shared a common aspect of working in a project environment in their respective field of work.
As the topic of the course elucidates, the aim of the training was to impart insight on the
methodology involved in monitoring and evaluation of projects. Since the PC primarily oversees
a variety of Public Sector Development Projects (PSDP) related to production, infrastructure and
social sector which are being undertaken by various government departments and ministries. The
training course was tailored accordingly to cater for the understanding of project monitoring and
evaluation in light of the PSDP which follow the protocols of project planning, monitoring and
evaluation developed by the PC. These protocols or procedural documents developed by the PC
are famously known as PC – Forms.
4. Schedule of Activities
The training course during its duration from September 11, 2018 to September 14, 2018 was
arranged according to the following schedule:
Training
Training Activities Resource Person
Days
Day 1 Introduction & Welcome Note Dr. Muhammad Ali Noor, Director
Overview of Project Management Cycle General, PPMI
Overview of Monitoring & Evaluation Dr. Umme-Laila, Assistant Professor,
National University of Sciences &
Technology (NUST), Islamabad
Day 2 Types & Methods for Project Monitoring
Day 4 Project Monitoring & Evaluation System Mr. Qamar Zaman, Data Processing
(PMES) Officer, M / o PD&R
4
5. Brief Overview of Training Course:
5
The central part of the lecture was detailed to explain the project management’s process group
of Monitoring and Controlling which is a necessary exercise performed during the execution of
the project. In doing so, monitoring during the currency of the project execution provides the
valuable information which enables the management to assess the progress of the project. This
resultantly enables the management of the project to make timely interventions imperative for the
project success. Methodology of monitoring of Public Sector Development projects undertaken
by PC and how it has constantly improved over the time with the use of modern methods
especially standardization of monitoring tools and embracing advance technology for tight
coordination among different stakeholders. Also, the two types i.e. External and Internal
monitoring were of significant interest as the two were explained to be fundamentally important
means for ensuring that the project achieves its intended objectives and goals.
Part two of the lecture stressed on the need of carrying our project evaluation which is a post
assessment operation to learn of the overall effects and impacts either intentional or unintentional
in light of the previously laid down project objectives. These effects and impacts after identification
are then analyzed as accurately as possible. The results of the such an evaluation then becomes
part of the policy making framework and guideline during the time of appraisal of next such
projects. Thus, improving the overall efficiency of the system in which future projects shall be
apprised, executed, monitored and controlled.
The last part of the lecture comprised of hands on exercises conducted by the presenter on the
procedural methodology of developing Cash Flow Plans and Work Plans for the PSDP funded
projects. The step by step methodology includes identification of activities and charting them on
Activity Chart, assigning time to each activity, preparation of work plan and then estimating cash
requirements based on work plan. Finally, Planning Commission proforma PC-III was deliberated
in detail to make the participants privy of the monitoring activities being conducted by the Project
Directors of various projects under the Public Sector Development Program.
6
• Ministry wise Project Profiles of all the on going projects are uploaded on the system.
• Annual Allocation for the projects authorized by the ministries.
• The work plans and cash flow plans.
• Monthly progress in terms of actual physical and financial progress is updated. This
feature has been linked with the release of funds as planned in the PC-I phasing of cash
flow.
• Remarks / Observations / Recommendation by Monitoring officers either external or
internal.
• Generates Reports for making prompt decisions and interventions by various stakeholders
at various work authorization levels.
• Project Director’s Report, Time Over run Reports and Problem Faced Reports are a few
types of professional reports which can be generated by PMES.
Project
Wing,
Planning
Commission
PMES
Project Concerned
Director Ministry
The aim is to standardize the management of all the ongoing projects under the PSDP in order to
enhance the Decision Support System of the Government using information and technology.
7
extremely important diplomatic endeavor between the two partner countries. The presenter
shared his practical experience and knowledge regarding the CPEC projects and summarized on
the need to manage the expectation of the stakeholders involved in any project and emphasized
on the need to clearly define the objectives and aims of the project. This in return would prove
pivotal in monitoring of the project on later on stages during the monitoring and control phase of
the project lifecycle.
The lecture was concluded after a round of questions and answers session. The participants were
keen to ask Project Director CPEC questions on various features of the on going CPEC projects.
The presenter encouraged a healthy debate among the participants and clarified their queries.
On one question asked by the author of this report regarding the transparency of the projects
agreed between Pakistan and China under CPEC and ensuing misinformation among the
mainstream media, the project director dispelled any such claims and ensured the audience that
the agreements made were in the best interest of the country. He further explained that China
had come to Pakistan’s financial aid by deciding to invest in our economy when no foreign
investment was available to the country. China’s vision for regional connectivity and Pakistan’s
infrastructure needs to accelerate its economic development are mutually beneficial and both
partners are committed in perusing these objectives.
The training session came to its final conclusion after the evaluation of the overall training course
by the participants which was followed by a certificate award ceremony. The participants of the
training course were distributed certificates by Mr. Hassan Dawood Butt, Project Director CPEC,
Ministry of Planning Development and Reform. Lastly, a group photo of the participants was taken
with the Director PPMI and the esteemed presenters.