Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2012-Nano-Photocatalytic Materials Possibilities and Challenges
2012-Nano-Photocatalytic Materials Possibilities and Challenges
de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
Hua Tong, Shuxin Ouyang, Yingpu Bi, Naoto Umezawa, Mitsutake Oshikiri,
and Jinhua Ye*
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 229
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
230 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
to catalyze overall water photolysis under visible light irradia-
tion.[35] A number of sulfides, nitrides and oxynitrides (CdS,
Ta3N5 and TaON are among the most promising examples)
have been investigated as alternative materials for visible light
or solar photocatalysis.[37] In addition to classic semiconduc-
tors, polymeric C3N4 was recently identified as a new photocata-
lyst for the production of hydrogen from water under visible
light.[38]
After a period of lower activity in the 1980s and 1990s,
interest in photocatalysis research from a scientific and engi-
neering viewpoint has grown exponentially. This is largely due
to the rapid development of nanotechnology and advanced
characterization techniques such as TEM, EELS, and XPS,
which provide great opportunities for photocatalysis to realize
its anticipated potential. Through persistent effort over the past
forty years, remarkable progress has been made in semicon-
ductor photocatalysis. A number of commercial photocatalytic
products, including air purifiers and self-cleaning windows, are
already on the market. However, for other important applica-
tions such as the production of hydrogen and organic fuel or
the fabrication of photoelectrochemical solar cells, much devel-
Figure 2. Band-edge positions of semiconductor photocatalysts relative
opment is still needed before commercialization is possible. to the energy levels of various redox couples in water.
1.3. Main Challenges and Opportunities solid-solution strategies have been extensively investigated and
applied.[51–57] Furthermore, the inter-particle electronic coupling
As we have seen, nanomaterials have emerged as pioneering of semiconductor nanocrystals has recently been found effective
photocatalysts and account for most of the current research for energy band reconstruction and bandgap narrowing.[58,59]
in this area. Nanomaterials can provide large surface areas, The utilization efficiency of incident photons in semiconductor
abundant surface states, diverse morphologies, and easy device photocatalytic materials can be further improved by methods
modeling, all of which are properties beneficial to photocatal- other than energy band engineering, such as the improve-
ysis. Significant progress has been made in the development of ment of light sensitization by the inclusion of quantum dots,[60]
novel nanomaterials in recent years.[39–49] Nevertheless, the effi- plasmon-exciton coupling between anchored noble metal nano-
ciency of nanomaterials, especially in solar photocatalysis, must particle co-catalysts and the host semiconductor,[61] and photon
be improved in order to meet engineering requirements. Fur- coupling in semiconductor photonic crystals.[62]
thermore, the stability and cost of these materials should also Another key issue influencing the photocatalytic capability
be carefully considered. It is thus a challenge of great impor- of a semiconductor is the nature of its surface/interface chem-
tance to identify and design new semiconductor materials that istry. The surface energy and chemisorption properties play
are efficient, stable and abundant. crucial roles in the transfer of electrons and energy between
The first property relevant to the photocatalytic activity of a substances at the interface, in governing the selectivity, rate
semiconductor is its energy band configuration, which deter- and overpotential of redox reactions on the photocatalyst sur-
mines the absorption of incident photons, the photoexcitation face, and in determining the susceptibility of the photocata-
of electron-hole pairs, the migration of carriers, and the redox lyst toward photo-corrosion.[63,64] In general, a higher surface
capabilities of excited-state electrons and holes.[50] Therefore, energy yields higher catalytic activity. Recently, much interest
energy band engineering is a fundamental aspect of the design has been focused on research into semiconductor crystals with
and fabrication of semiconductor photocatalysts. Regarding morphologies that provide large percentages of highly reactive
optical absorption, direct and narrow bandgap semiconductors facets.[65–67] Attempts to deliberately fabricate such materials
are more likely to exhibit high absorbance and hence be suitable are challenged by the thermodynamic growth mechanisms of
for the efficient harvesting of low energy photons. However, the the crystals. The selective absorption of polymers or ions on
recombination probability for photo-excited electron-hole pairs is high-energy facets has been employed to suppress the growth
rather high in these types of semiconductors, and the band-edge rate along their axes. In this way, it is possible to grow specific
positions are frequently incompatible with the electrochemical nanostructured materials with surfaces that are nearly 100%
potential that is necessary to trigger specific redox reactions (see comprised of high-energy facets; examples include ultra-thin
Figure 2). Some renowned photocatalysts such as TiO2 and WO3 sheets and highly symmetric polyhedral particles. The stronger
are in fact indirect bandgap semiconductors, but they exhibit the sorption of reagents and desorption of products on the
an abrupt onset of absorption like direct bandgap semiconduc- photocatalyst surface, the easier and faster the photocatalytic
tors. In order to modulate the bandgap and band-edge positions process. Therefore, appropriate modification of the surface is
in a precise manner, both doping with different elements and frequently necessary to facilitate photocatalysis.
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 231
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
232 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
also photoactive toward visible light due to the occupied Ag 4d exceeds its tolerance; transformation to oxynitrides, oxysulfides,
Review
or Pb 6s states at the top of the VB. Based on the same strategy, or oxyhalides then takes place,[101–105] which can induce a signif-
a number of new visible-light-sensitive photocatalysts con- icant increase in visible light absorption. Hitoki and co-workers
taining Cu+ and Sn2+ have also been developed.[92–95] developed TaON to illustrate this effect. Compared with Ta2O5,
The other strategy used to raise the VB maximum is to intro- TaON exhibits a narrower bandgap of 2.5 eV and an absorption
duce different anions on the O sites. For example, TiO2 has edge that is red-shifted by 170 nm.[101] Under visible light irra-
been doped with N, C, B, and S and the photocatalytic proper- diation, TaON enabled the effective evolution of H2 and O2 from
ties of these materials have been extensively investigated.[13,96–98] methanol and AgNO3 solution, respectively. Oxynitrides such as
However, only a limited enhancement in light absorption has LaTiON, oxysulfides such as Sm2Ti2S2O5, and oxyhalides such
thus far been obtained. For N-doping, the light-absorption edge as BiOX (X = Br, I)[102–105] can also effectively harvest visible
remains almost the same as in the undoped material. Doping light and exhibit higher photocatalytic activity for water splitting
with C, B, and S narrows the bandgap by less than 0.3 eV. and organic contaminant degradation than their oxide precur-
Thus, the significant extension of visible light absorption via sors. Among these non-metal elements, S can often completely
anion doping remains a big challenge. Li et al. reported that replace O to convert an oxide into a sulfide, because both O and
the layered structure and protonic acidity of lamellar solid acids S belong to group VIa. A series of sulfides have been reported,
can provide a diffusion channel and strong absorption site for including CdS, AgInZn7S9, ZnIn2S4 and so on,[106–109] in which
a nitrogen source, allowing an increased level of N-doping, as the visible light absorption is better than their oxide analogues.
shown in Figure 4.[56,99,100] In the typical example shown, a facile These sulfides thus exhibit high photocatalytic activity for the
solid-state reaction using urea as the nitrogen source allowed evolution of H2 from Na2S-Na2SO3 aqueous solution under vis-
HNb3O8 to be N-doped without destroying its layered structure. ible light irradiation.
This process yielded a 0.8 eV reduction in the bandgap and a
red-shift of the absorption edge by ∼80 nm. Under visible light
irradiation, N-doped HNb3O8 showed superior catalytic activity 2.2. Adjustment of Conduction Band
to commercial TiO2 (P25) as well as to N-doped Nb2O5 and TiO2
samples.[56] Although the modulation of the VB is generally of high priority,
For some simple oxides and multi-metal oxides, the crystal the level of the CB is closely related to the capability of reducing
structure is destroyed when the proportion of substituted anions H2O and O2 and should therefore also receive attention. When the
Figure 4. (A) Schematic picture of N-doping in the lamellar solid acid (HNb3O8) using urea as the N-source. (B) Schematic band structures of HNb3O8
and N-doped HNb3O8. (C) UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of N-doped and undoped HNb3O8 and Nb2O5 samples; the insets show pictures of
the HNb3O8 and N-doped HNb3O8 samples. (D) Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light irradiation (λ > 400 nm), using
no catalyst (a), N-doped Nb2O5 (b), Degussa P25 (c), N-doped TiO2 (d), and N-doped HNb3O8 (e). Adapted with permission.[56]
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 233
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
234 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
neously. However, all types of manipula-
tion generally suppress the redox potentials,
inevitably giving rise to an implicit conflict
between wide-range visible light absorption
and adequate redox capability. The strategies
that we have mentioned, based on elemental
substitution, do not allow precise adjustment
of the electronic structure and an optimal
balance between effective visible light absorp-
tion and adequate redox potentials is difficult
to achieve. Thus, the fabrication of solid-
solution photocatalysts with continuous
bandgaps has emerged as a requirement.
Three approaches to continuously manipu-
late these bandgaps have been explored,
namely continuous modulation of the VB,
continuous adjustment of the VB, and both
processes simultaneously.
Maeda and co-workers developed a novel
oxynitride, (ZnO)x(GaN)1-x, for use as a visible-
light-sensitive photocatalyst.[124,125] In this
solid solution, the ratios of O/N and Zn/Ga
can be controlled continuously by changing Figure 6. (A) Schematic electronic structures of AgAlO2, AgGaO2, and AgAl1-xGaxO2 solid solu-
the nitriding process. The bottom of the CB tions. (B) UV-visible absorption spectra of β-AgAl1-xGaxO2 solid solutions. (C) Rate of acetone
is mainly constructed from Ga 4s4p states, evolution, bandgap, and color of β-AgAl1-xGaxO2 as a function of x. (D) Apparent quantum effi-
ciency of IPA photodegradation over β-AgAl Ga0.4O2 in various wavelength ranges within the
whereas the top of the VB is composed of N UV-visible absorption spectrum. Horizontal 0.6 error bars indicate the wavelength ranges; vertical
2p states followed by Zn 3d states. A degree of error bars denote the AQE errors induced by the light-intensity measurement. Adapted with
p-d repulsion in the top of the VB induces nar- permission.[129] Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society.
rowing of the bandgap. When a Rh/Cr2O3 co-
catalyst was grafted, a sample with optimal composition exhibited that the level of the CB determines the competition between
a remarkably high apparent quantum yield of 2.5% for overall visible light absorption and redox potentials (see Section 5.3
water photolysis at incident wavelengths of 420–440 nm.[124] for details). Among these solid solutions, the β-AgAl0.6Ga0.4O2
An example of continuous modulation in the VB was provided sample showed the highest photocatalytic performance, with an
by Li et al., who studied NaNbO3-AgNbO3 solid solutions by activity 35 and 63 times higher than the two end-members of
varying the ratio of the metallic element Ag and the non-metal the series, β-AgAlO2 and β-AgGaO2, respectively. The electronic
element O.[126] These solid solutions were applied to the deg- structure of β-AgAl0.6Ga0.4O2 allowed an optimal balance to be
radation of gaseous isopropanol under visible light irradiation achieved between effective visible light absorption and adequate
and enhanced photoactivity was observed. redox potentials. Moreover, due to the in-situ loading of metallic
Continuous adjustment of the CB has attracted extensive Ag on the photocatalyst that occurred during synthesis, the
attention in the field of water splitting, because the level of the multi-electron reaction process taking place in β-AgAl0.6Ga0.4O2
CB plays a critical role in the reduction of H+ to H2. By contin- resulted in superior activity for the complete decomposition
uous substitution with either d0 cations or alkaline-earth metal of isopropanol in comparison with TiO2-xNx. The apparent
elements, the solid solutions BiTa1-xNbxO4, Sr2NbxTa2-xO7, quantum efficiency of β-AgAl0.6Ga0.4O2 for this reaction was
Sr1-xCaxIn2O4, and Ba1−xSrxSnO3 were synthesized and their 37.3% at an incident wavelength of 425 ± 12 nm.
photocatalytic properties with respect to water splitting were Continuous modulation of both the CB and VB is also an effec-
investigated in detail.[115,121,127,128] However, these oxides are tive approach to precisely optimize the light absorption and redox
only active under UV light. Recently, continuous modulation of potentials. For example, Yao et al. fabricated Ca1-xBixVxMo1-xO4
the CB was also applied to the study of organic contaminant and Wang et al. synthesized (AgNbO3)1-x(SrTiO3)x solid
elimination; the multi-electron reaction process is an attrac- solutions.[53,130] In the former material, continuous adjustment
tive and promising approach to the complete decomposition of both the ratio of V 3d states to Mo 4d states in the CB and
of organic pollutants, but the level of the CB is nevertheless of the ratio of Bi 6s states to O 2p states in the VB allowed optimal
importance for this reaction. A novel series of β-AgAl1-xGaxO2 band structures to be realized, achieving enhanced evolution of
solid-solution photocatalysts were synthesized by Ouyang and O2 from AgNO3 aqueous solution under visible light irradiation.
Ye.[129] As shown in Figure 6, varying the ratio of the group Similarly, Tsuji and co-workers developed binary and ternary
IIIa elements Al and Ga allows the bottom of the CB to be con- sulfide solid solutions using ZnS, CuInS2, and AgInS2.[131–133]
tinuously tuned and thereby allows the bandgap to be varied In this section, we have discussed in detail various strate-
between 2.19 and 2.83 eV. A theoretical study revealed that gies to modulate the band structure, indicating that energy
these oxides are typical electron-conductive semiconductors and band engineering is indeed an efficient approach to explore and
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 235
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Figure 7. SEM images of Ag nanowires (A), Ag/AgCl core-shell nanowires (B) and Pt/AgCl hetero-nanotubes (C). (D) Photocatalytic activities of Ag/
AgCl core-shell nanowires in the decomposition of MO dye under visible light irradiation (λ > 400 nm). (E) Schematic illustration of the growth process
for Ag/AgCl core-shell nanowires and Pt/AgCl hetero-nanotubes. Adapted with permission.[135,145] Copyright 2009, 2010, Royal Society of Chemistry.
236 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
in the ratio 8/92 exhibited the best activity;
the complete decomposition of MO dye was
achieved in 8 min under visible light irradiation.
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 237
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
238 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
shell structures (Figures 10A and B). This
material was used as a photocatalyst to fully
degrade RhB in 1.5 h under visible light
irradiation (Figure 10C). After the reaction
was complete, the catalyst could be removed
under an applied magnetic field and com-
pletely recycled (Figure 10D).
In addition to enhanced efficiency, the
stability of photocatalysts can also be signifi-
cantly improved by employing composite hier-
archical nanostructures. For example, Ag3PO4 Figure 11. Illustration of an electronic bond formed between (A) two atoms and (B) two
exhibits high photocatalytic activity but rela- nanocrystals.
tively poor stability in aqueous solution due to
its degree of solubility and relatively positive Ag+/Ag reduction discuss the energetic aspects of these attempts to enhance
potential (EθAg/Ag3PO4 = 0.45 eV versus NHE). A general proce- the optoelectronic conversion efficiency of photocatalytic
dure to resolve these problems has recently been demonstrated, materials.
involving the epitaxial growth of AgX (X = Cl, Br, I) nanoshells
on the surfaces of rhombic dodecahedral Ag3PO4 crystals at
room temperature.[157] The much lower solubility of the AgX 4.1. Electronic Coupling Assembly
nanoshells effectively protects the core Ag3PO4 crystals from dis-
solution during the photocatalytic process. Moreover, the CB and An ensemble of nanoparticles may exhibit new collective prop-
VB potentials of AgX semiconductors (except AgCl) are more erties resulting from the inter-particle coupling of surface
negative than that of Ag3PO4, which can promote the transfer electrons (excitons), plasmons or magnetic moments.[169–172]
and separation of photoexcited electron–hole pairs through the Recently, we found that electronic coupling in an assembly of
hetero-junctions. semiconductor nanoparticles can induce a substantial alteration
In addition to the examples above, the synergy of two semi- of the electronic structures of the nanoparticle ensemble.[58,59]
conductors is also appealing for the so-called Z-scheme mode. When two nanoparticles are electronically coupled, bonding
Here the two semiconductors take on different functions, for and anti-bonding levels are formed, yielding a new electronic
example, one for the evolution of H2 and the other for O2. In structure as illustrated in Figure 11.
a Z-scheme system, the carrier transfer between the two semi- In early research, nanoparticles were usually embedded in a
conductors proceeds via a pair of redox electrolyte mediators passivating medium of materials with much larger bandgaps
such as IO3−/I+. However, only a few successful cases of overall (e.g., surfactant ligands, polymers, and dielectric substances)
water photolysis have been reported thus far for Z-scheme sys- to eliminate surface defect states.[173] However, the degree of
tems; examples are TaON/WO3 and SrTiO3/BiVO4. [165–168]
inter-particle electronic coupling rapidly decreases with the
One of the most significant opportunities offered by hierar- increased spacing of nanoparticles imposed by the passivating
chical nanostructures with respect to practical applications in medium. Overlap of the wave functions of a pair of nanopar-
photocatalysis lies in the collective properties provided by nano- ticles, for example CdTe, was observed when the nanopar-
assembly. The following section reviews recent advances in this ticles were separated by less than 2 nm and led to a red-shift
topic. of the absorption and photoluminescence emission bands.[171]
For an inter-particle separation of 2 to 10 nm, long-range
dipole-dipole interactions between CdTe nanoparticles were
found to induce resonance energy transfer.[169]
4. Nano-assembly
Studies were later extended to assemblies of nanoparticles
Nano-assembly represents an important aspect of nanotech- with no passivating medium, in which the nanoparticles may
nology and provides a feasible and low-cost approach for the be closely aggregated with negligible spacing between them.
fabrication of hierarchical nanostructures using nanocrystal- In some instances, short-range interactions between surface
line building blocks. Remarkable progress has been made in defect states have been found to strongly influence the proper-
the construction of photocatalytic functional materials with ties of the nanoparticle assembly. For example, covalent Se-Se
wide-ranging architectures, dimensions, morphologies and bonds were formed between assembled CdSe nanoparticles in
patterns; these characteristics represent key elements that the presence of unpassivated Se2− ions on the surface, which
enable the control of electronic and optical properties. Going occurred due to selective photochemical etching.[174] Figure 12
beyond systems comprised of separate individuals, nano- presents recent findings concerning Ti-Ti electronic bonding in
assembly involves more profound scientific considerations in an assembly of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles with an average size
terms of inter-particle electron and energy transfer. To date, of 5 nm (Figure 12A).[58] In contrast to a white TiO2 nanoparticle
strong emphasis has been placed on exploring extraordinary colloid (Figure 12B), the nanoparticle assemblies were bright
properties by engineering the interactions between nano yellow in color (Figure 12C); the white color returned when
crystalline building blocks or by designing the configuration the assemblies were mechanically crushed to form a powder
of assemblies of such building blocks. In this section, we (Figure 12D). These TiO2 nanoparticle assemblies absorbed
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 239
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
240 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
Figure 13. (A1) TEM image of KCdCl3 nanowire templates used to form assemblies of CdS nanotubes, SEM and HRTEM images of which are shown
in (A2) and (A3). (B) Cd(OH)2 nanosheet templates (B1) used to form assemblies of CdS nanocages (B2) and (B3). (C) UV-visible absorption spectra.
(D) XPS spectra. (E) HRTEM image of an interface between two adjacent CdS nanotubes. (F) EELS spectra collected from two adjacent nanotubes and
their interface, as shown in (E). (G) Photoluminescence spectra. (H) Wavelength-dependent efficiency of sunlight utilization by CdS nano-assemblies
for the production of hydrogen by photocatalytic water splitting and for photovoltaic current generation. Adapted with permission.[59] Copyright 2011,
Royal Society of Chemistry.
size and shape distribution and formed a periodic hexagonal index contrast are referred to as photonic crystals. The propa-
pattern on the WO3 film (Figure 14B). Compared to the bare gation of electromagnetic waves in photonic crystals is affected
WO3 film, the Au-WO3 hybrid film not only harvested photons in the same way as electron motion is affected by the periodic
in the visible to infrared region of the spectrum (Figure 14C) potential in semiconductor crystals.[188] Analogous to the elec-
but also enhanced the intrinsic absorption of WO3 (Figure 14D) tronic bandgap in a semiconductor crystal, a photonic bandgap
due to the plasmon-exciton coupling interactions. Electrochem- can be defined in a photonic crystal; here electromagnetic
ical impedance spectroscopy (Figure 14E) revealed that the waves with a certain frequency range are forbidden due to
Schottky junctions formed between Au and WO3 can facilitate Bragg scattering from the dielectric interfaces.[188] For inverse
the separation of photo-generated carriers as well as the inter- opal photonic crystals, the photonic bandgap is given by the fol-
facial transfer of carriers. Consequently, substantially enhanced lowing equation:[189]
optoelectronic conversion efficiency was exhibited by this photo
electrode (Figure 14F).
2
8= 2 D n2S f + nai
2
r (1 − f ) − sin 2
2 (1)
3
4.3. Optical Coupling Assembly where λ is the wavelength of forbidden light, D is the pore
size of the inverse opal structure, ns and nair are the refrac-
In addition to inter-particle interactions, a coherent state exists tive indices of the solid matter and the air voids, respectively,
in regularly assembled architectures when the periodicity of the f is the volume percentage of the solid matter, and θ is the
structure is of a length scale compatible with the wavelength of incident angle of light. Fine control over the characteristics
the electromagnetic waves of interest (i.e., 350 ∼ 700 nm). Mate- of photonic crystals can dramatically modulate light-matter
rials possessing such architectures as well as a high refractive interactions.[190,191]
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 241
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
242 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
Figure 15. (A-C) SEM images of WO3 inverse opals fabricated using colloidal crystal templates comprised of polystyrene spheres with diameters of
200, 260, and 360 nm, respectively. The insets show photographs of the structures under white light. (D) Light reflectance spectra of the WO3 inverse
opals. The black arrows indicate the photonic band edges and the open circles show the locations of slow light. (E) Photocurrent-potential curves of
WO3 electrodes under light irradiation at λ > 300 nm. (F) Incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency. Adapted with permission.[62] Copyright
2011, American Chemical Society.
edges and the redox potentials of the target molecules is of great photocatalytically active for water splitting due to its low
importance because photoexcited carriers can only be transferred to bandgap (1.3 eV),[198] causing the CBM and VBM to be too low
the adsorbed molecules when there is a sufficiently large negative and too high in energy compared to the reduction and oxida-
offset of the conduction band minimum (CBM) and a sufficiently tion potentials of water, respectively. The recent discovery of
large positive offset of the valence band maximum (VBM) with the strong oxidation power of Ag3PO4 was made in the course
respect to the redox potentials. Therefore, a great deal of effort has of efforts to optimize the band structure of silver-based oxides
been spent on finding semiconductors with suitable band struc- by incorporating p-block elements,[119] i. e., atomic species with
tures for the photoexcitation and carrier transfer processes. The partially occupied p-valence states.[28] The quantum yield of the
second process above can usually be improved by minimizing the generation of O2 gas by water splitting using Ag3PO4 is nearly
concentration of defects. Both native defects and impurities in 90% under visible light, which is surprisingly high compared to
the semiconductors give rise to states in the bandgap, which act the ∼20% quantum yield of most photocatalysts. The extremely
as carrier recombination centers. An indirect bandgap is believed high efficiency of Ag3PO4 is encouraging and clarification of its
to be advantageous for the separation of carriers. However, the mechanism was eagerly awaited.
detailed mechanism of the carrier recombination process is still A comparative study of the electronic structures of Ag3PO4,
unclear and elucidation of which factors are most relevant to Ag2O, and AgNbO3 by first principles calculations revealed pos-
this process is a challenging subject of theoretical research. The sible explanations for the high performance of Ag3PO4.[199] The
third process above is also a popular subject of theoretical study main difference between Ag3PO4 and Ag2O can be found at the
because there are established computational methods available CBM; this mainly consists of Ag s states in Ag3PO4 and Ag d
to investigate this issue. One such method is the analysis of sur- states in Ag2O. The difference in electronic structure is due to
face energies for different surface orientations in order to identify the rigid PO4 tetrahedral unit; partial charge density originating
chemically reactive facets. The other method used is molecular from O sp and P sp derived bonding states is evident in the local
dynamics simulation for revealing chemical reaction pathways. density of states (DOS). This increases the ionic character of Ag+
One drawback of these approaches is a difficulty in incorporating and (PO4)3−, making the covalent Ag-O bonds weaker. Thus, the
the effect of photoexcited carriers. Therefore, development of the hybridization of Ag d and O p states is negligible in Ag3PO4, giving
computational methods themselves is required to achieve a thor- fully occupied d-states at the VBM. In contrast, covalent Ag-O
ough understanding of photocatalysis processes. In the following bonds are found in Ag2O, and Ag d - O p derived anti-bonding
subsections, we introduce selected topics in this theoretical work. states appear at the CBM. This explains the dominant character
of the CBM (Ag d) in Ag2O. In AgNbO3, the majority of the CBM
is formed by Nb d states and the nature of the Ag-O bonding does
5.1. Electronic Structure of Ag3PO4 not significantly affect the characteristics of the CBM.
In Figures 16A–C, the band structures of Ag3PO4, Ag2O,
Recently, silver-based oxides were found to be promising visible- and AgNbO3 are shown together with the wave function
light-sensitive photocatalysts.[26–28,86,196,197] Ag2O itself is not corresponding to the CBM. In Ag3PO4, the wave function at
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 243
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
244 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
Figure 17. (A) Calculated crystal structures of AgAl1-xGaxO2 solid solutions and (B) their corresponding electronic structures. Adapted with permis-
sion.[129] Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society.
the bandgap by the formation of N-H bonds.[224] Chromium- unit cell, geometric optimization was performed using various
doped TiO2 successfully shifts the photoabsorption edge when models for every chemical composition; the most stable model
co-doped with antimony.[225] The bonding effects of pairs of (with the lowest total energy) was then found (Figure 17A).
dopants such as W-N, Ta-N, and Fe-N have also been investi- The corresponding electronic structures of these models were
gated using DFT calculations.[226–228] Many other works have calculated using the widely used Cambridge Serial Total Energy
explored the effects of co-doping in various promising photo- Package (CASTEP) code.[236] It was revealed that the VBs of
catalysts such as SrTiO3,[229–231] NaTaO3,[232] BiVO4,[233] InMO4 AgAl1-xGaxO2 are always composed of Ag 4d and O 2p states,
(M = V, Nb, Ta),[234] and NiO.[235] whereas the CBs are mainly constructed from Ag 5s5p, Al
Previous studies have mainly focused on the red-shift of 3s3p, and Ga 4s4p states. Thus, the VBM is at a similar energy
the photoabsorption edges toward the visible light region, for all compositions, but the energy of the CBM is determined
but not enough attention has been paid to the important by the ratio of Ga/Al. Because the Ga 4s4p levels are lower in
issue of carrier recombination. One must realize that doping energy than the Al 3s3p levels (that is, the Ga 4s4p levels are
is usually accompanied by the formation of defects, and more positive than the Al 3s3p levels relative to the vacuum
photocatalytic activity cannot be improved when the concen- level), the substitution of Al by Ga induces a negative shift
tration of defects is high, even if visible light absorption is of the CBM and a subsequent narrowing of the bandgap.
enhanced. Both the correlation between doping and defect These calculations are consistent with the experimentally
formation and details of the carrier recombination mecha- determined change in bandgap (as shown in Figure 6) and
nism should be intensely studied in order to obtain a com- help to explain the variation in photoactivity across the solid
prehensive understanding of the effect of doping on photo- solution series. They also lend strong support to investiga-
catalytic processes. tions on other solid solutions such as Ca1-xBixVxMo1-xO4 and
(AgNbO3)1-x(SrTiO3)x.[53,130]
Sensitizing TiO2 into the visible region is still a hot topic.
5.3. Solid Solutions The incorporation of sulfur is one of the best methods of con-
tinuously modulating the bandgap because sulfur is isovalent
The synthesis of solid solutions represents an effective with oxygen and can apparently substitute oxygen without the
approach to the precise manipulation of the CB and VB levels, formation of charged defects. A study by Umezawa and co-
which allows an optimal balance between effective visible-light workers found that the bandgap of TiO2 decreases dramatically
absorption and adequate redox potentials to be achieved. The- upon incorporation of a small concentration of sulfur.[237] The
oretical calculations on the electronic structures of solid solu- lowest examined sulfur concentration of x = 0.015625 already
tions provide insight into the configurations of energy-band gave a significant decrease in the bandgap. This originates from
structures and the contributions of the orbitals of each element. the fact that the S 3p states are located above the O 2p states.
The study of Ouyang and Ye on AgAl1-xGaxO2 is a good example A further increase in S content gradually narrows the bandgap
of electronic structure calculation on multi-metal oxide solid to 1.5 eV at x = 0.25. The absorption of light across the entire vis-
solutions.[129] To determine the positions of Al and Ga in the ible spectrum is therefore attainable with a sulfur concentration
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 245
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
246 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
( = (E slab −nE bulk )/ 2A (4) as well as the higher surface energy of the {110} plane is a pos-
Review
sible origin of the high reactivity of Ag3PO4 rhombic dodecahe-
where Eslab is the total energy of the slab and Ebulk is the total dral crystals.
energy of the bulk per unit cell. Here, n is the number of bulk
unit cells contained in the slab, and A is the surface area of
each side of the slab. The computational results showed that 5.6. Molecular Dynamics Calculations
the surface energy of the {110} facet (1.31 J/m2) is higher than
that of the {100} facet (1.12 J/m2), indicating that the {110} facet Because photocatalytic reactions take place on the catalyst sur-
is more reactive. face, it is important to investigate how the target molecules
To investigate the stability of each surface under a reduced behave on the surface. It is often difficult to observe the reac-
oxygen atmosphere, we next studied the energies of reduced tion dynamics using in-situ experimental techniques. How-
surfaces. A model structure was created by removing an ever, the ab initio theoretical simulation technique based on
oxygen atom from each side of the {100} and {110} slabs. The density functional theory is a powerful alternative tool that is
geometries of the reduced surfaces were fully relaxed with rapidly being developed, in particular taking advantage of the
the mid-layer fixed, in the same way as the ideal surfaces. The astonishing recent progress in computational power that is
energy γ of the reduced surface was computed using[66] available.[240,241] Here we briefly introduce some results of
investigations into the water molecule adsorption properties of
( = (E surf + : O )/A (5) photo-catalyst surfaces, performed using quantum molecular
dynamics simulation (Car-Parrinello method).[242]
E surf = (E slab −nE bulk )/2 (6) Figure 20 indicates a snapshot of the (010) surface of a YVO4
where Eslab is the total energy of the reduced slab and μO is the catalyst, on which adsorbed water molecules are in thermal
chemical potential of oxygen, which is directly related to the equilibrium at 300 K. Good performance in the evolution of
O2 partial pressure in the atmosphere. The surface energy is both H2 and O2 has been observed in experiments performed
shown in Figure 19 as a function of μO, which was referenced under UV light irradiation.[243] The YVO4 bulk crystal contains
with respect to the total energy of a single oxygen molecule. The two kinds of polyhedra: a VO4 tetrahedron (V four-fold coor-
surface structure with lower energy is more likely to be realized. dinated by oxygen; 4c-V) and a YO8 triangular dodecahedron
The ideal surface was found to be stable at higher μO whereas (Y eight-fold coordinated by oxygen; 8c-Y). However, at the
the reduced surface predominated at lower μO. The intersection upper surface of the model structure, not only the 4c-V and
of the two lines corresponding to the ideal and reduced surfaces 8c-Y sites but also the 3c-V and 7c-Y sites are intentionally
gives the transition value of μO, which is higher for the {110} exposed to two monomolecular water layers. Close to thermal
plane than for {100}. This indicates that oxygen vacancies start equilibrium, some of the water molecules approach the V and
to form on the {110} surface even under a relatively high O2 Y sites and one molecule is then dissociatively adsorbed at the
partial pressure. Therefore, the abundance of oxygen vacancies V site that is three-fold coordinated by oxygen (3c-V). Water
molecules that are attracted to the 7c-Y sites are adsorbed only
in stable undissociative fashion on the picosecond time scale
of our simulation. At both the 4c-V and 8c-Y sites, no stable
Figure 19. Energies of reduced and ideal {110} and {100} surfaces of Figure 20. A snapshot of the YVO4 catalyst (010) surface with adsorbed
Ag3PO4 as a function of oxygen chemical potential. Adapted with permis- water molecules in thermal equilibrium at 300 K. Gray spheres: V. Sky blue
sion.[66] Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society. spheres: Y. Red spheres: O. White spheres: H.
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 247
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
Material (Polyhedral Adsorption site Adsorption property Equilibrium adsorption distance Adsorption energy Reference
structure) (Å) H2O⋅⋅⋅M- or HO⋅⋅⋅M- (eV/molecule)
YVO4 (4c-V and 8c-Y) 7c-Y Undissociated 2.5 0.64 [244]
YVO4 (4c-V and 8c-Y) 3c-V Dissociated 1.8 2.0 [244]
BiVO4 (4c-V and 8c-Bi) 5c-Bi Undissociated 2.6 0.58 [245]
TiO2 (Rutile) (6c-Ti) 4c-Ti Dissociated 2.0 1.5 This work
TiO2 (Rutile) (6c-Ti) 4c-Ti Undissociated 2.1 1.1 This work
adsorption was observed.[244] Table 1 summarizes the water The function and engineering of co-catalysts is one of the
molecule adsorption properties of YVO4, BiVO4[244,245] and the most important subjects in photocatalysis. Although a number
rutile form of TiO2. For the anatase form of TiO2, Reference of research groups, particularly that of Domen but also others,
[246] can be referred to. The dissociative adsorption of water have performed a lot of work in this field, no satisfactory under-
molecules is expected to be important for hydrogen generation. standing of the mechanisms involved has yet been arrived at.
From our study thus far, we can conclude that it is necessary For example, the question of how multiple-electron reactions
to dissociate water molecules at the catalyst surface, to create take place through co-catalysts has long been confusing to
stable cation sites at the catalyst surface (Msuf) with unsatu- researchers studying water oxidation or CO2 reduction. More
rated oxygen coordination, and to make the distance between than 100 semiconductor photocatalysts are known for the reduc-
the cation and the oxygen of the approaching water molecule tion of protons (H+) to H2, but much fewer for the oxidation of
(Owater) relatively short. These may be regarded as necessary oxygen anions (O2−) to O2 or for the reduction of CO2 to hydro-
conditions for developing a photocatalyst with higher perform- carbon molecules. In addition to the redox potentials, multiple-
ance. Fortunately, because there is a tendency for the adsorp- electron reactions involving co-catalysts are thought to play a key
tion distance between the Msuf and Owater to be similar to the role. For the reduction of CO2 in particular, semiconductor pho-
atomic distance between M and O inside the bulk crystal, our tocatalysts exhibit significant activity only when combined with
results should prove helpful in the search for better materials appropriate co-catalysts such as Pt, Cu, and RuO2.[142,248,249]
for hydrogen generation or molecular decomposition without It is worth noting that solar photocatalysis to convert CO2
the need for detailed computer simulations. into readily transportable hydrocarbon fuels is of great interest
to reduce the level of atmospheric CO2 and partly to relieve
the imbalance between energy supply and demand within the
present fossil fuel infrastructure. To reach this holy grail as well
6. Conclusion and Perspectives
as other challenges that might be overcome by photocatalysis,
In this review, we have selectively discussed and summarized obtaining a substantial breakthrough in efficiency requires a
the main recent achievements in the field of semiconductor good understanding of the surface/interface processes at the
photocatalysis. Our aim has been to reveal the key issues, chal- atom level. In-situ observations are highly desirable to obtain a
lenges and opportunities facing present and future research true picture of photocatalyst surfaces in action. Moreover, both
on photocatalytic materials. With significant fundamental sci- theoretical materials design and photocatalytic process simula-
entific and technological knowledge already accumulated by tions should take into account the surface/interface reactions
past research, photocatalysis represents an encouraging pros- of photoexcited carriers. We will then see a prosperous market
pect in the realization of a sustainable society. However, from involving photocatalytic materials. Energy band engineering,
the point of view of industrialization and commercialization, nanotechnology, modern materials characterization methods
many challenges remain in the areas of materials science and and advanced theoretical calculations and simulations promise
engineering. to sustain rapid development of this grand project.
For an ideal material, first of all a high quantum yield (QY)
must be achieved. In the case of pure water photocatalytic split-
ting, the highest QY thus far is 56%, reported for La-doped Acknowledgements
NaTaO3 under UV irradiation (λ = 270 nm);[247] for visible light
the best QY is 2.5% (λ = 400 ∼ 420 nm) for (GaN)x(ZnO)1-x solid This work was supported by World Premier International Research Center
Initiative on Materials Nanoarchitectonics (MANA), MEXT, Japan.
solutions.[124,125] These results are not yet sufficient for practical
solar engineering. Although energy band alterations have been Received: July 18, 2011
extensively applied, a high QY cannot be achieved simply by Published online: October 4, 2011
extending the absorption of visible light by tuning the bandgap.
Very recently, an extremely high QY of nearly 90% under visible
light (λ = 420 nm) was found using Ag3PO4 for the evolution
of O2 in water photolysis.[119] This discovery and subsequent [1] M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Y. Choi, D. W. Bahnemann, Chem.
theoretical studies have provided a clue as to the best way of Rev. 1995, 95, 69.
searching for novel highly efficient photocatalytic materials. [2] A. Hagfeldt, M. Grätzel, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 49.
248 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
[3] M. A. Fox, M. T. Dulay, Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 341. [46] G. C. Xi, B. Yue, J. Y. Cao, J. H. Ye, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5144.
Review
[4] A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature 1972, 238, 37. [47] D. Chen, J. H. Ye, Adv. Func. Mater. 2008, 18, 1922.
[5] A. V. Pamfilov, Y. S. Mazurkev, S. Y. Mukhlya, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. [48] G. C. Xi, J. H. Ye, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 8719.
1970, 44, 958. [49] H. B. Zeng, W. P. Cai, P. S. Liu, X. X. Xu, H. J. Zhou, C. Klingshirn,
[6] H. D. Müller, F. Steinbach, Nature 1970, 225, 728. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 1661.
[7] F. Steinbach, Nature 1969, 221, 657. [50] D. E. Scaife, Solar Energy 1980, 25, 41.
[8] W. Doerfler, K. Hauffe, J. Catal. 1964, 3, 171. [51] K. Maeda, K. Domen, Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 612.
[9] A. L. Linsebigler, G. Q. Lu, J. T. Yates, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 735. [52] Z. G. Yi, J. H. Ye, J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 1.
[10] R. Wang, K. Hashimoto, A. Fujishima, M. Chikuni, E. Kojima, [53] D. F. Wang, T. Kako, J. H. Ye, J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 3785.
A. Kitamura, M. Shimohigoshi, T. Watanabe, Nature 1997, 388, 431. [54] G. Q. Li, T. Kako, D. F. Wang, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, Dalton T. 2009,
[11] K. Hashimoto, H. Irie, A. Fujishima, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 2423.
8269. [55] D. F. Wang, T. Kako, J. H. Ye, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2724.
[12] S. C. Roy, O. K. Varghese, M. Paulose, C. A. Grimes, ACS Nano [56] X. K. Li, N. Kikugawa, J. H. Ye, Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3816.
2010, 4, 1259. [57] D. F. Wang, J. H. Ye, T. Kako, T. Kimura, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110,
[13] R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, Y. Taga, Science 2001, 15824.
293, 269. [58] H. Tong, N. Umezawa, J. H. Ye, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4219.
[14] S. In, A. Orlov, R. Berg, F. Garcia, S. Pedrosa-Jimenez, M. S. Tikhov, [59] H. Tong, N. Umezawa, J. H. Ye, T. Ohno, Energ. Environ. Sci. 2011,
D. S. Wright, R. M. Lambert, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13790. 4, 1684.
[15] C. C. Hu, H. S. Teng, J. Catal. 2010, 272, 1. [60] Q. Y. Li, T. Kako, J. H. Ye, J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 10187.
[16] Q. Y. Li, T. Kako, J. H. Ye, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5352. [61] X. Q. Chen, P. Li, H. Tong, T. Kako, J. H. Ye, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mat.
[17] J. S. Jang, S. H. Choi, H. Park, W. Choi, J. S. Lee, J. Nanosci. Nano 2011, 12, 044604.
techno. 2006, 6, 3642. [62] X. Q. Chen, J. H. Ye, S. X. Ouyang, T. Kako, Z. S. Li, Z. G. Zou, ACS
[18] J. M. Feng, J. J. Han, X. J. Zhao, Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 64, 268. Nano 2011, 5, 4310.
[19] R. S. Dibbell, D. G. Youker, D. F. Watson, J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, [63] T. L. Thompson, J. T. Yates, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4428.
113, 18643. [64] R. Osgood, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4379.
[20] T. Nakahira, Y. Inoue, K. Iwasaki, H. Tanigawa, Y. Kouda, [65] H. G. Yang, C. H. Sun, S. Z. Qiao, J. Zou, G. Liu, S. C. Smith,
S. Iwabuchi, K. Kojima, M. Gratzel, Makromol. Chem.-Rapid 1988, H. M. Cheng, G. Q. Lu, Nature 2008, 453, 638.
9, 13. [66] Y. P. Bi, S. X. Ouyang, N. Umezawa, J. Y. Cao, J. H. Ye, J. Am. Chem.
[21] T. Nakahira, M. Gratzel, Makromol. Chem.-Rapid 1985, 6, 341. Soc. 2011, 133, 6490.
[22] F. T. Wagner, G. A. Somorjai, Nature 1980, 285, 559. [67] G. C. Xi, J. H. Ye, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1893.
[23] K. Domen, S. Naito, M. Soma, T. Onishi, K. Tamaru, J. Chem. Soc. [68] Y. Yang, H. Zhong, C. X. Tian, Res. Chem. Intermediat. 2011, 37, 91.
Chem. Comm. 1980, 543. [69] M. A. Rauf, S. S. Ashraf, Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 151, 10.
[24] H. Reiche, W. W. Dunn, A. J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 2248. [70] A. Fujishima, X. T. Zhang, D. A. Tryk, Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 515.
[25] S. X. Ouyang, N. Kikugawa, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. [71] M. N. Chong, B. Jin, C. W. K. Chow, C. Saint, Water Research 2010,
2009, 366, 309. 44, 2997.
[26] S. X. Ouyang, N. Kikugawa, D. Chen, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, J. Phys. [72] S. Ahmed, M. G. Rasul, W. N. Martens, R. Brown, M. A. Hashib,
Chem. C 2009, 113, 1560. Desalination 2010, 261, 3.
[27] X. K. Li, S. X. Ouyang, N. Kikugawa, J. H. Ye, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. [73] K. Maeda, K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2655.
2008, 334, 51. [74] M. Kitano, M. Hara, J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 627.
[28] S. X. Ouyang, H. T. Zhang, D. F. Li, T. Yu, J. H. Ye, Z. G. Zou, J. [75] P. F. Ji, M. Takeuchi, T. M. Cuong, J. L. Zhang, M. Matsuoka,
Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 11677. M. Anpo, Res. Chem. Intermediat. 2010, 36, 327.
[29] J. W. Tang, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, [76] M. D. Hernandez-Alonso, F. Fresno, S. Suarez, J. M. Coronado,
4463. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 1231.
[30] J. H. Ye, Z. G. Zou, A. Matsushita, Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2003, 28, 651. [77] A. J. Morris, G. J. Meyer, E. Fujita, Accounts Chem. Res. 2009, 42,
[31] Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, K. Sayama, H. Arakawa, J. Photoch. Photobio. A 1983.
2002, 148, 65. [78] H. Yamashita, Y. Ichihashi, M. Takeuchi, S. Kishiguchi, M. Anpo, J.
[32] Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, H. Arakawa, J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 13098. Synchrotron Radiat. 1999, 6, 451.
[33] Z. G. Zou, H. Arakawa, J. H. Ye, J. Mater. Res. 2002, 17, 1446. [79] J. M. Herrmann, J. Disdier, P. Pichat, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 108, 618.
[34] J. H. Ye, Z. G. Zou, M. Oshikiri, A. Matsushita, M. Shimoda, [80] E. Borgarello, J. Kiwi, M. Gratzel, E. Pelizzetti, M. Visca, J. Am.
M. Imai, T. Shishido, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 356, 221. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2996.
[35] Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, K. Sayama, H. Arakawa, Nature 2001, 414, 625. [81] K. E. Karakitsou, X. E. Verykios, J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 1184.
[36] T. Kako, Z. G. Zou, M. Katagiri, J. H. Ye, Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, [82] W. Mu, J. M. Herrmann, P. Pichat, Catal. Lett. 1989, 3, 73.
198. [83] T. Umebayashi, T. Yamaki, H. Itoh, K. Asai, J. Phys. Chem. Solids
[37] F. E. Osterloh, Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 35. 2002, 63, 1909.
[38] X. C. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, [84] T. Nishikawa, Y. Shinohara, T. Nakajima, M. Fujita, S. Mishima,
J. M. Carlsson, K. Domen, M. Antonietti, Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76. Chem. Lett. 1999, 28, 1133.
[39] Q. Y. Li, B. Yue, H. Iwai, T. Kako, J. H. Ye, J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, [85] J. H. Ye, Z. G. Zou, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2005, 66, 266.
114, 4100. [86] H. Kato, H. Kobayashi, A. Kudo, J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106,
[40] P. V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 2834. 12441.
[41] D. Chen, J. H. Ye, Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 4585. [87] T. Kako, J. H. Ye, J. Mater. Res. 2007, 22, 2590.
[42] H. B. Zeng, P. S. Liu, W. P. Cai, S. K. Yang, X. X. Xu, J. Phys. Chem. [88] X. K. Li, T. Kako, J. H. Ye, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2007, 326, 1.
C 2008, 112, 19620. [89] J. W. Tang, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, Catal. Lett. 2004, 92, 53.
[43] X. Chen, S. S. Mao, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2891. [90] A. Kudo, K. Omori, H. Kato, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11459.
[44] D. Chen, J. H. Ye, Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2327. [91] H. G. Kim, D. W. Hwang, J. S. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
[45] H. Tong, J. H. Ye, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 1473. 8912.
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 249
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Review
[92] S. Saadi, A. Bouguelia, M. Trari, Solar Energy 2006, 80, 272. [132] I. Tsuji, H. Kato, A. Kudo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3565.
[93] S. Saadi, A. Bouguelia, A. Derbal, M. Trari, J. Photochem. Photobio. [133] I. Tsuji, H. Kato, A. Kudo, Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1969.
A 2007, 187, 97. [134] Y. P. Bi, J. H. Ye, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 10327.
[94] Y. Hosogi, Y. Shimodaira, H. Kato, H. Kobayashi, A. Kudo, Chem. [135] Y. P. Bi, J. H. Ye, Chem. Commun. 2009, 6551.
Mater. 2008, 20, 1299. [136] S. Chatterjee, K. Bhattacharyya, P. Ayyub, A. K. Tyagi, J. Phys. Chem.
[95] Y. Hosogi, H. Kato, A. Kudo, J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 17678. C 2010, 114, 9424.
[96] S. Sakthivel, H. Kisch, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4908. [137] I. S. Cho, S. Lee, J. H. Noh, D. W. Kim, D. K. Lee, H. S. Jung,
[97] W. Zhao, W. H. Ma, C. C. Chen, J. C. Zhao, Z. G. Shuai, J. Am. D. W. Kim, K. S. Hong, J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 3979.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4782. [138] H. S. Jung, Y. J. Hong, Y. Li, J. Cho, Y. J. Kim, G. C. Yi, ACS Nano
[98] X. B. Chen, C. Burda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5018. 2008, 2, 637.
[99] X. K. Li, N. Kikugawa, J. H. Ye, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 3538. [139] J. S. Jang, U. A. Joshi, J. S. Lee, J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 13280.
[100] X. K. Li, B. Yue, J. H. Ye, Appl. Catal A-General 2010, 390, 195. [140] G. Kenanakis, N. Katsarakis, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2010, 378, 227.
[101] G. Hitoki, T. Takata, J. N. Kondo, M. Hara, H. Kobayashi, K. Domen, [141] N. Q. Wu, J. Wang, D. Tafen, H. Wang, J. G. Zheng, J. P. Lewis,
Chem. Commun. 2002, 1698. X. G. Liu, S. S. Leonard, A. Manivannan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
[102] A. Kasahara, K. Nukumizu, T. Takata, J. N. Kondo, M. Hara, 132, 6679.
H. Kobayashi, K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 791. [142] Q. Liu, Y. Zhou, J. H. Kou, X. Y. Chen, Z. P. Tian, J. Gao, S. C. Yan,
[103] A. Ishikawa, T. Takata, J. N. Kondo, M. Hara, H. Kobayashi, Z. G. Zou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14385.
K. Domen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13547. [143] L. Wang, H. W. Wei, Y. J. Fan, X. Z. Liu, J. H. Zhan, Nanoscale Res.
[104] X. Zhang, Z. H. Ai, F. L. Jia, L. Z. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, Lett. 2009, 4, 558.
112, 747. [144] M. Shahid, I. Shakir, S. J. Yang, D. J. Kang, Mater. Chem. Phys.
[105] K. Ogisu, A. Ishikawa, Y. Shimodaira, T. Takata, H. Kobayashi, 2010, 124, 619.
K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 11978. [145] Y. P. Bi, J. H. Ye, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1532.
[106] H. J. Yan, J. H. Yang, G. J. Ma, G. P. Wu, X. Zong, Z. B. Lei, J. Y. Shi, [146] A. Selloni, Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 613.
C. Li, J. Catal. 2009, 266, 165. [147] G. Liu, C. H. Sun, H. G. Yang, S. C. Smith, L. Z. Wang, G. Q. Lu,
[107] Z. B. Lei, W. S. You, M. Y. Liu, G. H. Zhou, T. Takata, M. Hara, H. M. Cheng, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 755.
K. Domen, C. Li, Chem. Commun. 2003, 2142. [148] S. W. Liu, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
[108] A. Kudo, I. Tsuji, H. Kato, Chem. Commun. 2002, 1958. 11914.
[109] X. H. Zhang, D. W. Jing, M. C. Liu, L. J. Guo, Catal. Commun. 2008, [149] T. Sasaki, M. Watanabe, H. Hashizume, H. Yamada, H. Nakazawa,
9, 1720. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8329.
[110] J. W. Tang, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 1644. [150] Y. Ebina, T. Sasaki, M. Harada, M. Watanabe, Chem. Mater. 2002,
[111] J. Yin, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 4936. 14, 4390.
[112] J. Yin, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 61. [151] Y. Ebina, N. Sakai, T. Sasaki, J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 17212.
[113] J. Sato, H. Kobayashi, N. Saito, H. Nishiyama, Y. Inoue, J. Photo- [152] T. G. Xu, C. Zhang, X. Shao, K. Wu, Y. F. Zhu, Adv. Func. Mater.
chem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 2003, 158, 139. 2006, 16, 1599.
[114] J. Sato, N. Saito, H. Nishiyama, Y. Inoue, J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, [153] K. Maeda, M. Eguchi, S. H. A. Lee, W. J. Youngblood, H. Hata,
105, 6061. T. E. Mallouk, J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 7962.
[115] J. Sato, N. Saito, H. Nishiyama, Y. Inoue, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, [154] J. H. Huang, R. Ma, Y. Ebina, K. Fukuda, K. Takada, T. Sasaki,
107, 7965. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 2582.
[116] J. Sato, H. Kobayashi, Y. Inoue, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 7970. [155] T. Shibata, G. Takanashi, T. Nakamura, K. Fukuda, Y. Ebina,
[117] W. F. Zhang, J. W. Tang, J. H. Ye, J. Mater. Res. 2007, 22, 1859. T. Sasaki, Energ. Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 535.
[118] Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, H. Arakawa, Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 1765. [156] R. Z. Ma, T. Sasaki, Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 5082.
[119] Z. G. Yi, J. H. Ye, N. Kikugawa, T. Kako, S. X. Ouyang, H. Stuart- [157] Y. P. Bi, S. X. Ouyang, J. Y. Cao, J. H. Ye, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
Williams, H. Yang, J. Y. Cao, W. J. Luo, Z. S. Li, Y. Liu, R. L. Withers, 2011, 13, 10071.
Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 559. [158] J. Lv, T. Kako, Z. S. Li, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, J. Phys. Chem. C 2010,
[120] Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, H. Arakawa, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 332, 271. 114, 6157.
[121] Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, K. Sayama, H. Arakawa, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, [159] T. Kako, J. Ye, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2010, 320, 79.
343, 303. [160] D. F. Wang, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 384, 139.
[122] Y. Shimodaira, H. Kato, H. Kobayashi, A. Kudo, Bull. Chem. Soc. [161] D. F. Wang, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 3255.
Jpn. 2007, 80, 885. [162] X. Zong, H. J. Yan, G. P. Wu, G. J. Ma, F. Y. Wen, L. Wang, C. Li, J.
[123] S. X. Ouyang, Z. S. Li, Z. Ouyang, T. Yu, J. H. Ye, Z. G. Zou, J. Phys. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7176.
Chem. C 2008, 112, 3134. [163] G. M. Wang, X. Y. Yang, F. Qian, J. Z. Zhang, Y. Li, Nano Lett. 2010,
[124] K. Maeda, K. Teramura, D. L. Lu, T. Takata, N. Saito, Y. Inoue, 10, 1088.
K. Domen, Nature 2006, 440, 295. [164] J. Hensel, G. M. Wang, Y. Li, J. Z. Zhang, Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 478.
[125] K. Maeda, T. Takata, M. Hara, N. Saito, Y. Inoue, H. Kobayashi, [165] R. Abe, T. Takata, H. Sugihara, K. Domen, Chem. Commun. 2005,
K. Domen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8286. 3829.
[126] G. Q. Li, T. Kako, D. F. Wang, Z. G. Zou, J. Ye, J. Solid State Chem. [166] K. Maeda, M. Higashi, D. L. Lu, R. Abe, K. Domen, J. Am. Chem.
2007, 180, 2845. Soc. 2010, 132, 5858.
[127] M. Yoshino, M. Kakihana, W. Cho, H. Kato, A. Kudo, Chem. Mater. [167] Y. Sasaki, A. Iwase, H. Kato, A. Kudo, J. Catal. 2008, 259, 133.
2002, 14, 3369. [168] Y. Sasaki, H. Nemoto, K. Saito, A. Kudo, J. Phys. Chem. C 2009,
[128] Y. P. Yuan, J. Lv, X. J. Jiang, Z. S. Li, T. Yu, Z. G. Zou, J. H. Ye, Appl. 113, 17536.
Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 094107. [169] S. A. Crooker, J. A. Hollingsworth, S. Tretiak, V. I. Klimov, Phys. Rev.
[129] S. X. Ouyang, J. H. Ye, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7757. Lett. 2002, 89, 186802.
[130] W. F. Yao, J. H. Ye, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 11188. [170] H. Zeng, J. Li, J. P. Liu, Z. L. Wang, S. H. Sun, Nature 2002, 420, 395.
[131] I. Tsuji, H. Kato, H. Kobayashi, A. Kudo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, [171] R. Koole, P. Liljeroth, C. D. Donega, D. Vanmaekelbergh,
126, 13406. A. Meijerink, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10436.
250 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
[172] J. A. Fan, C. H. Wu, K. Bao, J. M. Bao, R. Bardhan, N. J. Halas, [209] C. Di Valentin, G. Pacchioni, A. Selloni, S. Livraghi, E. Giamello, J.
Review
V. N. Manoharan, P. Nordlander, G. Shvets, F. Capasso, Science Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11414.
2010, 328, 1135. [210] S. Livraghi, M. C. Paganini, E. Giamello, A. Selloni, C. Di Valentin,
[173] A. P. Alivisatos, Science 1996, 271, 933. G. Pacchioni, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15666.
[174] I. R. Pala, I. U. Arachchige, D. G. Georgiev, S. L. Brock, Angew. [211] V. I. Anisimov, F. Aryasetiawan, A. I. Lichtenstein, J. Phys.: Condens.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3661. Mat. 1997, 9, 767.
[175] E. Rabani, D. R. Reichman, P. L. Geissler, L. E. Brus, Nature 2003, [212] N. Umezawa, J. H. Ye, unpublished.
426, 271. [213] J. Y. Lee, J. Park, J. H. Cho, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 011904.
[176] S. Srivastava, A. Santos, K. Critchley, K. S. Kim, P. Podsiadlo, [214] K. S. Yang, Y. Dai, B. B. Huang, M. H. Whangbo, J. Phys. Chem. C
K. Sun, J. Lee, C. L. Xu, G. D. Lilly, S. C. Glotzer, N. A. Kotov, Sci- 2009, 113, 2624.
ence 2010, 327, 1355. [215] E. Finazzi, C. Di Valentin, G. Pacchioni, J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 220.
[177] B. D. Korth, P. Keng, I. Shim, S. E. Bowles, C. Tang, T. Kowalewski, [216] K. Yang, Y. Dai, B. B. Huang, Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 195201.
K. W. Nebesny, J. Pyun, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6562. [217] Z. Y. Zhao, Q. J. Liu, Z. Q. Zhu, J. Zhang, Acta Phys. Sin. 2008, 57,
[178] F. A. Aldaye, A. L. Palmer, H. F. Sleiman, Science 2008, 321, 1795. 3760.
[179] J. H. Weaver, G. D. Waddill, Science 1991, 251, 1444. [218] K. S. Yang, Y. Dai, B. B. Huang, J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 18985.
[180] A. R. Tao, J. X. Huang, P. D. Yang, Accounts Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1662. [219] K. S. Yang, Y. Dai, B. B. Huang, M. H. Whangbo, Chem. Mater.
[181] O. Kulakovich, N. Strekal, A. Yaroshevich, S. Maskevich, 2008, 20, 6528.
S. Gaponenko, I. Nabiev, U. Woggon, M. Artemyev, Nano Lett. [220] J. G. Yu, Q. J. Xiang, M. H. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2009, 90, 595.
2002, 2, 1449. [221] C. A. Fu, T. Z. Li, J. S. Qi, J. Pan, S. H. Chen, C. Cheng, Chem. Phys.
[182] W. Zhang, A. O. Govorov, G. W. Bryant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, Lett. 2010, 494, 117.
146804. [222] Z. H. Zhou, M. T. Li, L. J. Guo, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2010, 71, 1707.
[183] J. Lee, P. Hernandez, J. Lee, A. O. Govorov, N. A. Kotov, Nat. [223] C. Di Valentin, E. Finazzi, G. Pacchioni, A. Selloni,
Mater. 2007, 6, 291. S. Livraghi, A. M. Czoska, M. C. Paganini, E. Giamello, Chem.
[184] A. O. Govorov, G. W. Bryant, W. Zhang, T. Skeini, J. Lee, N. A. Kotov, Mater. 2008, 20, 3706.
J. M. Slocik, R. R. Naik, Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 984. [224] L. Mi, Y. Zhang, P. N. Wang, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 458, 341.
[185] Z. W. Liu, W. B. Hou, P. Pavaskar, M. Aykol, S. B. Cronin, Nano [225] C. Di Valentin, G. Pacchioni, H. Onishi, A. Kudo, Chem. Phys. Lett.
Lett. 2010, 11, 1111. 2009, 469, 166.
[186] Y. Tian, T. Tatsuma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7632. [226] R. Long, N. J. English, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 132102.
[187] J. Lee, T. Javed, T. Skeini, A. O. Govorov, G. W. Bryant, N. A. Kotov, [227] R. Long, N. J. English, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 478, 175.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4819. [228] L. C. Jia, C. C. Wu, S. Han, N. A. Yao, Y. Y. Li, Z. B. Li, B. Chi,
[188] J. D. Joannopoulos, P. R. Villeneuve, S. H. Fan, Nature 1997, 386, 143. J. A. Pu, L. Jian, J. Alloy. Compd. 2011, 509, 6067.
[189] M. M. Ren, R. Ravikrishna, K. T. Valsaraj, Environ. Sci. Technol. [229] X. Zhou, J. Y. Shi, C. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 8305.
2006, 40, 7029. [230] F. Li, K. Yu, L. L. Lou, Z. Q. Su, S. X. Liu, Mater. Sci. Eng. B-Adv.
[190] M. Honda, T. Seki, Y. Takeoka, Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1801. 2010, 172, 136.
[191] K. A. Arpin, A. Mihi, H. T. Johnson, A. J. Baca, J. A. Rogers, [231] M. Miyauchi, M. Takashio, H. Tobimatsu, Langmuir 2004, 20, 232.
J. A. Lewis, P. V. Braun, Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1084. [232] M. Choi, F. Oba, I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 014115.
[192] T. Baba, Nat. Photon. 2008, 2, 465. [233] W. J. Yin, S. H. Wei, M. M. Al-Jassim, J. Turner, Y. F. Yan, Phys. Rev.
[193] S. Nishimura, N. Abrams, B. A. Lewis, L. I. Halaoui, T. E. Mallouk, B 2011, 83, 155102.
K. D. Benkstein, J. van de Lagemaat, A. J. Frank, J. Am. Chem. Soc. [234] G. L. Li, Z. Yin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 2824.
2003, 125, 6306. [235] R. Long, N. J. English, D. A. Mooney, Phys. Lett. A 2010, 374,
[194] T. Suezaki, P. G. O’Brien, J. I. L. Chen, E. Loso, N. P. Kherani, 1184.
G. A. Ozin, Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 559. [236] M. D. Segall, P. J. D. Lindan, M. J. Probert, C. J. Pickard, P. J. Hasnip,
[195] A. Tao, P. Sinsermsuksakul, P. Yang, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 435. S. J. Clark, M. C. Payne, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 2717.
[196] Y. Maruyama, H. Irie, K. Hashimoto, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, [237] N. Umezawa, A. Janotti, P. Rinke, T. Chikyow, C. G. Van de Walle,
23274. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 041104.
[197] T. Kako, N. Kikugawa, J. Ye, Catal. Today 2008, 131, 197. [238] T. Umebayashi, T. Yamaki, H. Itoh, K. Asai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002,
[198] L. H. Tjeng, M. B. J. Meinders, J. Vanelp, J. Ghijsen, G. A. Sawatzky, 81, 454.
R. L. Johnson, Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 3190. [239] M. Lazzeri, A. Vittadini, A. Selloni, Phy. Rev. B 2001, 63, 155409.
[199] N. Umezawa, O. Y. Shuxin, J. H. Ye, Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 035202. [240] M. Sumita, C. P. Hu, Y. Tateyama, J. Phy. Chem. C 2010, 114, 18529.
[200] X. G. Ma, B. Lu, D. Li, R. Shi, C. S. Pan, Y. F. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C [241] H. Cheng, A. Selloni, Langmuir 2010, 26, 11518.
2011, 115, 4680. [242] R. Car, M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 2471.
[201] X. L. Nie, S. P. Zhuo, G. Maeng, K. Sohlberg, Int. J. Photoenergy [243] J. Ye, Z. Zou, M. Oshikiri, T. Shishido, in Functionally Graded Mate-
2009, 294042. rials VII, Vol. 423-5 (Eds.: W. Pan, J. Gong, L. Zhang, L. Chen),
[202] H. Irie, Y. Watanabe, K. Hashimoto, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5483. Trans Tech Publications Ltd., Zurich-Uetikon, 2003, p. 825.
[203] H. B. Fu, L. W. Zhang, S. C. Zhang, Y. F. Zhu, J. C. Zhao, J. Phys. [244] M. Oshikiri, M. Boero, A. Matsushita, J. H. Ye, J. Chem. Phys. 2009,
Chem. B 2006, 110, 3061. 131, 034701.
[204] C. Di Valentin, G. Pacchioni, A. Selloni, Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, [245] M. Oshikiri, M. Boero, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 9188.
085116. [246] A. Vittadini, A. Selloni, F. P. Rotzinger, M. Gratzel, Phys. Rev. Lett.
[205] Z. S. Lin, A. Orlov, R. M. Lambert, M. C. Payne, J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 81, 2954.
2005, 109, 20948. [247] H. Kato, K. Asakura, A. Kudo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3082.
[206] J. B. Varley, A. Janotti, C. G. Van de Walle, Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2343. [248] N. Zhang, S. X. Ouyang, P. Li, Y. J. Zhang, G. C. Xi, T. Kako, J. H. Ye,
[207] M. Batzill, E. H. Morales, U. Diebold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, Chem. Commun. 2010, 47, 2041.
026103. [249] S. C. Yan, S. X. Ouyang, J. Gao, M. Yang, J. Y. Feng, X. X. Fan,
[208] A. K. Rumaiz, J. C. Woicik, E. Cockayne, H. Y. Lin, G. H. Jaffari, L. J. Wan, Z. S. Li, J. H. Ye, Y. Zhou, Z. G. Zou, Angew. Chem. Int.
S. I. Shah, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 262111. Ed. 2010, 49, 6400.
Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229–251 © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 251