Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cold Rolling
Cold Rolling
Cold Rolling
D O N A L D J. M c P H E R S O N
T h e d e v e l o p m e n t of a c o m p r e h e n s i v e c o m p u t e r i z e d m o d e l f o r c o l d r o l l i n g i s d e s c r i b e d .
R o l l i n g f o r c e s , t o r q u e s , f o r w a r d s l i p , t e m p e r a t u r e s of r o l l s a n d s t r i p , t h e r m a l c a m b e r s
of r o l l s , a s w e l l a s s t r i p t h i c k n e s s p r o f i l e a n d f l a t n e s s , a r e p r e d i c t e d . T h e m o d e l i s a p -
p l i c a b l e t o b o t h b a s i c a n d a p p l i e d s t u d i e s of t h e r o l l i n g p r o c e s s . Its p r i m a r y p u r p o s e s
a r e to a i d in o p t i m i z i n g p e r f o r m a n c e of e x i s t i n g m i l l s , in t h e d e s i g n of n e w c o l d m i l l s ,
a n d in d e v i s i n g o p e n - l o o p a n d c l o s e d - l o o p a u t o m a t i c f l a t n e s s - c o n t r o l s y s t e m s .
T H I S is the f o r t y - e i g h t h annual C a m p b e l l M e m o r i a l E d w a r d D e M i l l e C a m p b e l l w i t h a p r o g r e s s r e p o r t in
L e c t u r e c o n v e n e d t o r e m e m b e r a n d h o n o r a m a n of i n - t h e f i e l d of m e t a l l u r g y .
d o m i t a b l e s p i r i t . F o r P r o f e s s o r C a m p b e l l , b l i n d e d in M o s t of t h e 47 p r e v i o u s C a m p b e l l l e c t u r e r s h a v e h a d
a l a b o r a t o r y a c c i d e n t a t t h e a g e of 28, c o n t i n u i n g l i f e a n i n t i m a t e a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h a s p e c i f i c f i e l d of r e s e a r c h ,
w a s u n t h i n k a b l e w i t h o u t t h e c o n t i n u a n c e of p e r s o n a l u s u a l l y of d e c a d e s s t a n d i n g . S o m e d r i f t e d into b r o a d e r
p r o d u c t i v i t y . And p r o d u c e he did, as a t t e s t e d by s c o r e s a c t i v i t y with a little l e s s p e r s o n a l i n v o l v e m e n t at the
of p i o n e e r i n g i n v e s t i g a t i o n s into the c o n s t i t u t i o n and b e n c h o f s c i e n t i f i c i n q u i r y . A s o n e of t h o s e w h o s e d a i l y
h e a t t r e a t m e n t of s t e e l , a n d m o r e i m p o r t a n t l y , b y h u n - w o r k in i n d u s t r i a l c o r p o r a t e m a n a g e m e n t i s s c a r c e l y
d r e d s of s t u d e n t s i n s p i r e d b y h i s e n t h u s i a s t i c e x a m p l e the yarn from which Campbell lectures are woven, I
t o t a k e t h e p a t h s of m e t a l l u r g i c a l p r o d u c t i v i t y . s h a l l r e p o r t to you on t h e p r o g r e s s of a m a j o r p r o g r a m
I a m g r e a t l y h o n o r e d to b e a m o n g t h o s e who h a v e i n v o l v i n g a t a l e n t e d a n d d e d i c a t e d g r o u p of K a i s e r A l u -
b e e n g i v e n t h e o p p o r t u n i t y to t o a s t t h e m e m o r y of minum and Chemical Corporation researchers, to whom
IOO
~ *-~ Neutral Plane
.•70
CI_
80 Normal Stress,
C
O0
O'3
\
60
Ld
O~
\
Z O3
/
9 /
F- 40 /
<I~60
/ Coef. Friction
Or"
/ Assumptions
}--
or) 20 / 0
S, eA Z
f
/ Constant
Function of
Strip-Roll
oo Differential
cO o Speed
I i
LLJ
F-
iN .,/
0'3 -20 _ Bite Length ~! 50
Bite Length I Entry Exit ]
_ Bite Len_thg _
Fig. 5--Comparison of calculated normal and frictional stress
distributions assuming constant coefficient of friction 11 with Fig. 6--Effect of friction assumption on location of neutral
measured values. 17 plane.
o- 9 o ~-'_#-
~ 160( 0 L/OXIDE"~C.: : ~_~,L-_Z
U2 FILM ~ _~ t ~c_
m
0
~ 120(
MASTER PROGRAM
J I I
I i
Reduction Schedule Progl
I
Multlstand Energy Balance Program
I Common
I Data
I
I
Base
Force-Torque-Slip Model ]
j Input
I
Stream
w
Every
Input
Energy Balance Model
t 1
and I
Stored ~-- Output Thermal Camber Model
Data Variable I
Each
Alloy
and
Constant
I
Data Link and Stored
Roll Gap and Strip Shape ModeiI I
.... Control Link Mill I
PRIORD: 25.00
WR 01AM., I N . : 11.000 11.000 11.000 11.000 11,000
E N [ R Y ~A., IN.: .102U ,0532 .0410 .0273 .0198
EXIT h A . , I N . : .0632 .0410 .0273 o0198 .0135
WIDTH, I N . : 42.50 42.50 42.50 ~2.50 42.50
LNT TENSION,PSI: 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00 4000.00
EAT TENSION,PSI: 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00 4000.00 6000.00
HEUUCTION, S: 38.01 35.17 33.42 27.52 31.80
SPEED, FPM: 585.07 912.55 1383.13 1907.36 2801.97
FORWARD S L I P , ~: 1.307 .241 -.709 -.683 -.862
POWER RATIO: .9996 1.0002 1.0006 .8003 1.0000
NET HORSEPOWER: Iili.92 1086o82 1048.35 773.40 915.82
b H O ~ HORSEPOWER: 1216.55 1217.21 1217.74 973.93 1217.01
IUTAL FORCE, LB: 782567.8 641087.2 520104.6 393046.4 352224.2
ROLL TEMP,, F, FC 131.60 1~3.00 144.27 132.01 145.20
BUR TEMP., F, FC: 103.87 107.67 108,09 10~.00 108.40
STRIP TEMP.,F=
ENIERING B I T E 117.53 166.38 185.17 186.81 172.28
EAITIN~ BIlE 203,08 242.45 256.18 240.25 245.15
,~ I00 % RATEDON
ALL STANDS
Reduction Schedule Program
The reduction schedule program was employed as
the first step in analyzing the problem. Table II shows
the computer output of the reduction schedule program
O O for the particular aluminum alloy and temper under
3O O
study, using 0.102-in. entry gage and 0.0135-in. exit
z gage. The program automatically adjusted speed and
o 2o
o altered the reduction on each stand until it established
~J
I0 a combination which used full rated horsepower on
n~
each stand (nominally, 1250 hp on Stands I, 2, 3, 5 and
0 1000 hp on Stand 4).
Included in Table II are the accompanying outputs of
~> 750 the Force-Torque-Slip Model along with predictions
m~ 0 of nominal roll and strip temperatures from the En-
~Z 5ooI o ergy Balance Model. Plots of the data from Table FI
o o for all five stands are given in Fig. 13 for speed,
~ 250 I power, reduction, and force; and in Fig. 14 for for-
ward slip, bite length, flow stress, and energy.
o- I 4' 5' Shown in Figs. 15 and 16 for Stands 1 and 5 only are
STAND distributions through the bite of shear stress, normal
Fig. 13--Speed,power, reduction and separatingforce through pressure, differential speed between strip and roll,
five stands.
and strip thickness. These parameters are also ob-
tained as output from the Force-Torque-Slip-Model.
heat transfer medium, accounts for large thermal Note the absence of a neutral plane in Fig. 16. This
*,ers ~ d resultant center buckles. The problem is a result of the roll speed being higher than the ex-
could be alleviated in part by employing work rolls iting strip speed (negative forward slip).
A 40
m~
025
O" I 0
0 O 0
o~
55
~ ~o
f 0 0 0 0 5C
500[
5: O"
a~-~
~
~-
3~f
zo.
,o
0
D
0
O
0
1:3 Total
0 Oef~
1 = 00201
9'~ Friction J
u~ 0
0,015
STAND
o ~ 2s
(n ~_J
~ --~
n- o
n<~D~2O
P-O
T
15
o
O
o
z 50 p[
9- t c 14
2oo ioo
l i gO__ o
?
o I ~ 4 5
STAND
Fig. 17--Energy partition through five stands.
c
O.IO
0.09 the e n t e r i n g s t r i p which would not have b e e n heated
by d e f o r m a t i o n in p r e v i o u s s t a n d s .
,~ 0.08
Fig. 18 i n d i c a t e s p r e d i c t e d r o l l and s t r i p t e m p e r a -
a_ 0.07 t u r e s through five s t a n d s with a P h a s e II i m p r o v e d
cooling s y s t e m b e i n g i n s t a l l e d on the m i l l . The lower
~0.06 r o l l t e m p e r a t u r e for Stand 4 is due to the lower h o r s e -
0.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0
DISTANCE FROM ROLL AXIS PLANE (m.) power used on that stand in the schedule u n d e r c o n s i d -
Fig. 15-Shear stress, normal pressure, differential speed, and e r a t i o n . The s a m e data, for the p r e v i o u s Phase I i m -
thickness through bit of Stand 1. proved cooling, a r e shown in Fig. 19. The final s t r i p
shape depends l a r g e l y on what happens at Stand 5,
where the p r e d i c t e d work r o l l t e m p e r a t u r e s were de-
Multistand E n e r g y B a l a n c e P r o g r a m
c r e a s e d f r o m 186 to 145~ b y the m o d i f i c a t i o n s . The
Next, the a n a l y s i s employed the m u l t i s t a n d e n e r g y effect of this t e m p e r a t u r e d e c r e a s e on r o l l shape will
b a l a n c e p r o g r a m . Fig. 17 shows e n e r g y p a r t i t i o n to a be e l a b o r a t e d l a t e r .
r o l l in t e r m s of both heat flow and f r a c t i o n of total Fig. 20 shows, at the top, the d i s t r i b u t i o n of d e f o r -
bite e n e r g y through five s t a n d s . The low v a l u e s at m a t i o n and f r i c t i o n e n e r g i e s and, at the bottom, r o l l
Stand 1 a r e due p r i m a r i l y to the low t e m p e r a t u r e of and s t r i p t e m p e r a t u r e s , all as a function of d i s t a n c e
8 0 j ~ - C~176
1801 ,./~"-" Surface
I I I , |
I 2 4
5 5 D_
STAND 160 ,/ .-/- / 5mils
280
-k DISTANCE FROM ROLL AXIS PLANE (in.)
Fig. 20--Distribution of energy and temperature through roll
bite, Stand i.
240
LL
0
02 F- L2
~00
L~ 0 Work t
rnQtion
F- 0 0 Rolls 08
160 >-
(-9
O/ 0.4
Ld
& & Bockup
Z
LtJ
Frlction~ _
120 Roils
z~
Averoge
240 / --'~ ~ ~
BO I I L- I I ~ m Strip Surface
I 2 5 4 5 Roll ~ f/ -" ~
O3
x O x O x O 0 0 0 ( xx \\ "~ Diminished,Phase~1
1,0'[[ ~ / \ ( 1 8 6 " F Peak,
TOP Diminished v IdealX \~-/" \ ,58~ Mean)
BOTTOM Spray Z \\ 9
O x O x O x O 0 0 ( xx
0rY 0.5 Full Cool, ~
(I49 ~
X - Nozzle OFF
._l
O-- Nozzle ON
0 0
01
<
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_~oio ooo
TOP
BOTTOM
).
x
xx
x
Full Cool
Spray
-0,5
_1.00 I a
I0
DISTANCE FROM CENTER OF MiLL (in.)
,
H- O
Z Ideal Entry S t r i p . Z f
i,I f
W 500 psi ~NP'J -~"
C_)
(_9 <~ - 1 - -
_J
O_ Ck
09
C~
i.__ -5 I 1 I 1 (23 2
U) o 5 I0 15 20 25 _J
._J ~_~...~500 psi WRJ
DISTANCE FROM CENTER OF MILL (in.) orr~
~
. . . .
i I
I'o '
20 '
30 40
DISTANCE FROM CENTER OF MILL (in.)
Fig. 27--Components of work rolI d i s p l a c e m e n t s vs width,
m
Stand 5.
o 8000
<
UJ
(/)~- 500 psi WRJ U 600o
- 5 0 0 psi WRJ "~- ~\
zd_~ Zero psi WRJ / ~ /
l.d 0 Zero psi W R J ~
w~ 4000
J ~o
CL
2000
._! 500 psi WRJ
_J
0 ~
(3_122 Zero is[_.WR t I
y uJ 8000
(D 0
[K
0
133 I u-
uJ
o
~6ooo 500 psi WRJ ~ \~
Zero & 500 psi WRJ oc
uJ
F-
f
Z
Strip Edge ~ 1 [~-Elnd of BUR Borret
I .... |
I0 20 50 40 pp. 40000 t L _
to I0 ,.o
DISTANCE FROM CENTER OF MILL (in.) ~- DISTANCEFROM CENTER OF MILL (in.)
Fig. 26--Components of backup roll d i s p l a c e m e n t s vs width,
Stand 5. Fig. 28--Distribution of force vs width, Stand 5.
120
Pass I
o Pass 2
Pass 3 i ; , i i i
o Pass
+ Pass
4
5 /" "X~I Banc I 0 I 0 180 200
PREDICTED TEMP, (~
EL
/
CO
E7 /
//(////
~/ //
/ / \ Fig. 33--Comparison of measured and predicted temperatures
for several products at both stands of a two-stand cold mill.
Cooled Zone
rY 140[ ~"
<:~ / j~ /
Strip Width
/ / /e / .11 . . . . . . . . . .
El/
0
LL // /:// 130 - Predicted I
E:3
Iii
F-
o
E3
, f G.: 12o
Ld iii
EE
EL
//// ,
I I I 0 , .,,. ,o" i
0 I 2 :5 4 5 6 7
MEASURED FORWARDSLIP (%) r'r" i o o ~
Fig. 32--Comparison of measured and predicted forward slip.
I I I
p r o d u c t i o n m i l l data. Within the t i m e a v a i l a b l e for this 90 I0 0 I0 20 50
l e c t u r e , I have c o n c e n t r a t e d on the logical d e v e l o p m e n t DISTANCE FROMCENTER OF MILL (in.)
of the model and its powerful a n a l y t i c a l c a p a b i l i t i e s .
Fig. 34--Comparison of measured and predicted thermal
However, a l a r g e amount of v e r i f i c a t i o n data has b e e n camber, fourth stand of a tandem mill.
compiled f r o m e x p e r i m e n t s on l a b o r a t o r y and p r o d u c -
tion m i l l s . A few e x a m p l e s of the v e r i f i c a t i o n a r e given
below. Fig. 33 shows the r e s u l t s of one such e x p e r i m e n t . Roll
P r e d i c t i o n s of force, torque, and f o r w a r d slip have t h e r m a l c a m b e r checks have also indicated that the
b e e n found to be a c c e p t a b l y a c c u r a t e for r o l l i n g a l u m i - model is f u n c t i o n i n g p r o p e r l y . One check s e l e c t e d at
num. They have b e e n c o n f i r m e d in s e v e r a l different r a n d o m is shown in Fig. 34; this is f r o m the fourth
m i l l s for a v a r i e t y of alloys and t e m p e r s , and with both stand of a t a n d e m m i l l . The m e a s u r e m e n t s were c o m -
oil and w a t e r - b a s e d l u b r i c a n t s . Some c o m p a r i s o n s of pleted about 5 m i n u t e s after the end of r o l l i n g , which
m e a s u r e d and p r e d i c t e d f o r c e and t o r q u e a r e shown in allowed t i m e for the heat to flow f r o m the c e n t e r t o -
Fig. 31. F o r w a r d slip c o m p a r i s o n s a r e given in Fig. ward the c o o l e r e n d s ; this accounts, in part, for the
32. T h e s e data w e r e obtained f r o m m u l t i p l e p a s s e s on lower than p r e d i c t e d t e m p e r a t u r e g r a d i e n t s at the
an i n s t r u m e n t e d s i n g l e - s t a n d m i l l s i m u l a t i n g t a n d e m s t r i p edges.
mill rolling. M e a s u r e d an d p r e d i c t e d exit s t r i p t h i c k n e s s p r o f i l e s ,
The f r i c t i o n and d e f o r m a t i o n e n e r g y d i s t r i b u t i o n s like the one shown in Fig. 35, indicate p r o p e r f u n c t i o n -
p r e d i c t e d b y the model a r e not d i r e c t l y m e a s u r a b l e in ing of the Roll Gap and Strip Shape Model. The m e a -
m i l l e x p e r i m e n t s . They a r e v e r i f i e d in p a r t by the fact s u r e m e n t s w e r e made in t e s t s on an i n s t r u m e n t e d p r o -
that p r e d i c t i o n s of r o l l and s t r i p t e m p e r a t u r e s a r e in duction m i l l . T h e s e included f o r c e ; power; f o r w a r d
good a g r e e m e n t with e x t e n s i v e e x p e r i m e n t a l v a l u e s . s l i p ; t o r q u e ; e n t r y and exit t e n s i o n s ; t e m p e r a t u r e and
t h i c k n e s s p r o f i l e s ; c o o l a n t p r e s s u r e s and p a t t e r n s ; and
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
r o l l t e m p e r a t u r e p r o f i l e s . Due to d i f f i c u l t i e s in m e a -
s u r i n g e x a c t r o l l w e a r , t h e r m a l c a m b e r s , and v a r i a - The program which I have discussed was performed
t i o n s in s t r i p p r o f i l e s u n d e r m i l l c o n d i t i o n s , a d d i t i o n a l under the general management of T. R. Pritchett and
l a b o r a t o r y r o l l i n g e x p e r i m e n t s a r e p l a n n e d to obtain R. T. Myer at the Corporation's Center for Technology,
the m o r e p r e c i s e v e r i f i c a t i o n d a t a t h a t a r e d e s i r e d . Pleasanton, California and in various production mills.
P e r h a p s the m o s t s i g n i f i c a n t v e r i f i c a t i o n to date is Support and encouragement by line management, par-
t h a t the m o d e l h a s s u c c e e d e d in p r e d i c t i n g a c c u r a t e l y ticularly J. H. Williams, Manager, Sheet and Plate Di-
the t y p e and l o c a t i o n of b u c k l e s v i s u a l l y o b s e r v e d ir, vision, and I. R. Davidson, Vice President and General
p r o d u c t i o n m i l l e x p e r i m e n t s . The v e r i f i c a t i o n of c o m - Manager, Fabricated Products Group, have been sin-
m e r c i a l i m p o r t a n c e , of c o u r s e , will c o m e only as the cerely appreciated.
m o d e l is put to u s e in o u r p r o d u c t i o n m i l l s . This is in Thanks are due especially to the following people for
p r o c e s s and e a r l y r e s u l t s a r e e n c o u r a g i n g . their direct participation in the program:
--C. R. St. John chaired the steering committee and
coordinated the efforts of Research, Engineering, Pro-
cess Technology, and the rolling plants.
SUMMARY --D. G. Harrington supervised the model development
In the c o u r s e of t h i s l e c t u r e , I have t r i e d to m a k e work.
the following m a j o r p o i n t s : --Yu-Wen Hsu developed the Force-Torque-Slip Model
1. The r o l l i n g p r o c e s s is of p r i m e i m p o r t a n c e in the and made major contributions in applied mechanics.
w o r l d . I m p r o v e m e n t s will c o m e about as b a s i c c o n - --M. A. Carter applied the SINDAprogram to thermal
c e p t s a r e a p p l i e d to the p r e s e n t t e c h n o l o g y . T h e s e i m - modeling and performed extensive computer program-
p r o v e m e n t s will b e n e f i t p r o d u c t quality, d e c r e a s e p o s t - ming.
r o l l i n g p r o c e s s i n g , and c o n s e r v e m a t e r i a l p r e s e n t l y --W. A. Niethammer developed rolling mill instru-
requiring reprocessing. Accordingly, reduced rolling mentation and worked on thermal modeling.
c o s t s will r e s u l t . --J. D. Sprowl made major contributions to planning,
2. B e c a u s e m a s s i v e i n v e s t m e n t s in e x i s t i n g r o l l i n g conducting and evaluating mill test programs.
m i l l s in m o s t c a s e s p r e c l u d e t h e i r b e i n g s u m m a r i l y --L. J. Whiteley participated in instrumentation de-
r e p l a c e d b y new units, much c a n b e gained b y a p p l y i n g velopment, mill experiments and computer analysis.
i m p r o v e d t e c h n o l o g y in o r d e r to o p t i m i z e m i l l p e r f o r - --Sus Takeda developed the required digital data
mance. system.
3. R o l l i n g e n t a i l s a m o n u m e n t a l l y c o m p l e x a p p l i c a - --W. A. Wong designed and applied the split-Hopkin-
tion of independent and dependent m e c h a n i c a l , t h e r m a l son bar.
and p h y s i c a l p a r a m e t e r s . T h e s e r e l a t i o n s h i p s a r e b e - To all of this fine team, I am deeply grateful.
c o m i n g b e t t e r u n d e r s t o o d and a p p l i e d b y m e a n s of Valuable assistance in the preparation of this lecture
m a t h e m a t i c a l m o d e l s and c o m p u t e r s . was rendered by many, but I must particularlythank
4. Any c o m p a n y u s i n g r o l l i n g m i l l s c a n r e a p m a n y M e s s r s . H a r r i n g t o n , St. John, W. H. Cundiff, G. G e r a r d ,
b e n e f i t s f r o m the u s e of a c o m p u t e r p r o g r a m which W. J. Davidson and M r s . J a n e t Hallett.
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS V O L U M E 5, D E C E M B E R 1 9 7 4 - 2 4 9 9