Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agro 222 Jan 21 Topic 4 & 5
Agro 222 Jan 21 Topic 4 & 5
Agro 222 Jan 21 Topic 4 & 5
Aa AA+Aa
AA aa aa
♦NB: Illustration:
Genotype AA Aa aa
Genotypic freq. p2 2pq q2
● Examples:
(1) If N = 80, D =4 and H = 24, then p = (D + ½H)/N = (4 + 12)/80 = 0.2.
Since p +q = 1, q = 1 – p, hence q = 1 – 0.2 = 0.8.
(2) Calculating genotypic frequency for the next generation in a random mating in the above example:
AA = p2 = 0.22 = 0.04
Aa = 2pq = 2(0.2 x 0.8) = 0.32
aa = q2 = 0.82
= 0.64
Total = 1.00
(d) Gene action (effect): There are 4 types of gene action, (1) Additive gene action, (2) Dominance gene action,
(3) Overdominance gene action and (4) Epistatic gene action.
The first three occur within the locus, and the last one between loci, as explained below.
Aa Aa Aa Aa
● ● ● ● ● ● ●
6a 5 4 3 2 1 6b
AA mid-parent aa
value
(1) Additive gene action (no dominance): Each allele contributes one increment to the expression of a trait,
hence heterozygote = mid-parent value, i.e. Aa = 3.
(2) Dominance gene action (effect): Are the deviations from the additivity that make the progeny from a
cross resemble one parent more than the other, e.g.
♦ Partial dominance effects, Aa = 4.
♦ Complete dominance effects, Aa = 5.
(3) Overdominance gene action: Examplified by Aa = 6a and/or 6b, i.e. heterozygote exceeds either parent.
The combined effect of each allele at a locus exceeds the independent effect of the alleles. This is a case of
TRANSGRESSIVE SEGREGATION (VARIATION), which means segregation/variation outside the
range of parents.
(4) Epistatic gene action (effect): Epistasis = expression of genes at one locus is influenced by the genes at a
different locus; though the genes are inherited independently, but interact to form one effect.
● Factors that affect gene action: (1) type of genetic material, (2) mode of pollination, (3) mode of inheritance
and (4) presence of gene linkage.
4.2 Heritability:
(a) Concept: ● It refers to that proportion of the observed phenotypic variation for a given trait in a population, that
is due to genetic control (i.e. heritable).
● Designated H or h2.
● Formula, H or h2 = VG/VP, where, VG = genetic variance and VP = phenotypic variance.
● It is a ratio measured on a scale of 0 (zero) to 1 (one), where,
0 = all variations are due to environmental effects,
1 = all variations are due to genetic differences.
(b) Types of heritability:
(i) Broad sense heritability, h2b or Hb.= VG/VP; which estimates h2 on the basis of all genetic effects.
(ii) Narrow sense heritability, h2ns or Hns = VA/VP, this estimates h2 on the basis of additive gene effects.
(c) Estimation/calculation of h2: To be done after covering topic 5.
▪ N.B.: (n-1) = degree of freedom (df) → the concept is that in any given sample set, there is one value that is
not independent. The use of df gives an unbiased estimation of the variance.
♦ Example: Data on plant height (cm): 25, 32 29, 26, 31, 27, 30, 28.
(∑ 𝒙)²
∑ 𝒙² (∑ 𝒙)²
▪ S² = 𝒏
, Where n = 8, ∑𝒙𝟐 = 𝟔𝟓𝟒𝟎, = 𝟔𝟒𝟗𝟖
𝒏 𝟏 𝒏
𝟔𝟓𝟒𝟎 𝟔𝟒𝟗𝟖 𝟒𝟐
∴ S² = = = 6cm2
𝟖 𝟏 𝟕
𝑺 𝑺𝟐
♦ Formula: SE = or SE =
√𝒏 𝒏
𝟐.𝟒𝟓
▪ From the above data, SE = = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟕
√𝟖
(e) Coefficient of Variation (CV):
♦ It is a measure of the relative variability of given populations or traits in a given population.
♦ It is also an index of the reliability of the experiment, as it indicates the degree of precision with which data
was collected. Higher CV implies that data was unreliable. Generally CV of ≤ 20% is acceptable,
depending on the experiment; the lower the better.
𝒔 𝟐.𝟒𝟓𝒄𝒎
♦ Formula: CV = x 100; from the above data, CV = x 100 = 8.6%.
𝒙 𝟐𝟖.𝟓𝟎𝒄𝒎
5.3.1 Introduction:
(a) Why analyse data? It is done to get/determine the difference among the treatments.
(b) Methods of analysis: Differ with; (i) Number of treatments (ii) Experimental design used.
(c) Experimental designs:
(i) Types – CRD, RCBD, Latin square, etc.
(ii) Terms: (1) Experimental unit/plot (2) Replication (3) Treatment (4) Randomization
(5) Experimental error (6) Local control.
(7) Interpretation of the ANOVA Results: Done from the comparison of Fcal and Fcrit/tab.
You will declare that there is significant difference among treatments, IF Fcal > Fcrit/tab and vice versa, at say
5% (0.05) or 1% (0.01) level of probability or significance.
-Above case: There is significant difference among treatments at both 5% and 1% levels of probability.
Use of LSD:
𝟐𝑺²
(i) 𝑳𝑺𝑫∝ = 𝒕∝,𝒆𝒅𝒇 × , Where ∝ = Level of probability, edf = error degrees of freedom, t = t-test (read
𝒓
in the t-test table), S² = Variance = EMS, r= # of replications.
𝟐×𝟐.𝟔𝟖
(ii) 𝐋𝐒𝐃𝐨.𝐨𝟓 = 𝐭 𝟎.𝟎𝟓,𝟏𝟎 × = 𝟏. 𝟑𝟑𝟔𝟔𝟔𝟐𝟓
𝟑
− 𝒕𝟎.𝟎𝟓,𝟏𝟎 → Read from t table values; = 2.228; Therefore, LSD = 2.228 ×1.3366625 ≅ 2.98
(iii) Two means will be declared significantly different if their difference is greater than the LSD value-and vice
versa.
(iv)Presentation of Results: Arrange from the highest to the lowest mean, i.e.
Treatment: F A C D B E
Mean: 18.23a 16.45ab 14.00bc 11.38cd 9.54de 8.19e
*Depending on the trait and/or objective, treatments F and A are superior to the rest and vice versa, i.e.
treatments B and E is superior to the rest of the treatments.
CALCULATIONS OF HERITABILITY
𝑻𝒕𝑴𝑺 𝑬𝑴𝑺
♦ VG = ; 𝒓 = # of replications.
𝒓
♦ VE = EMS
(2) Using variances of parents 1 and 2 (P1 & P2), F1 and F2 populations:
♦ Estimate variances of P1, P2, F1 & F2 separately.
♦ P1, P2 & F1 are non-segregating populations; hence any variation will be due to the environmental effects
𝑽𝑷𝟏 𝑽𝑷𝟐 𝑽𝑭𝟏
only. Therefore, VP1, VP2 & VF1 will give an estimation of VE, e.g. VE =
𝟑
OR
𝑽𝑷𝟏 𝑽𝑷𝟐
VE = OR VE = VF1.
𝟐
♦ F2 is a segregating generation/population; hence variation will be due to both genetic and environmental effects.
Therefore, VF2 = VG + VE. This implies that VF2 = VP, and also VG = VF2 – VE.
𝑽𝑮 𝑽𝑭𝟐 𝑽𝑬
♦ Finally, h2b = or h2b = .
𝑽𝑷 𝑽𝑭𝟐
Example: